Loading...
Reso 639 80,000.6 1-U-69 RESOLUTION NOe 639 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DENYING THE GRANTING OF A USE PERMIT to operate a riding stable in an agricultural-recreational (A-ua) zone. APPLICANT: Buck Norred ADDRESS: 1177 Olive Branch Lane, San Jose, California SUBMITTED: January 10, 1969 LOCATION: 10850 Stevens Canyon Road ZONE: A-ua AREA: 18 acres ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Continued from Page 1) CONDITIONS AND FURTHER FINDINGS: 1. The applicant has been granted a Use Permit (7-U-69) in another location. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 28.th day of April, 1969, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, Irwin, Puetz, Frolich NAYS: None ABSENT: Commissioner Hirshon APPROVED: ATTEST• _ Donald A. Frolich, Chairman . ; Planning Commission �C�i� �C. �v�� ''�I Adde Laurin Seniar Planner -2- C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T I N 0 City Hall 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, Calif'�rnia 9501�+ I'elephone (�+08) 252-�+505 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO DENYING A USE PERMIT WHEREAS the Planr�ing Commissior� of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as stated on Page 2; and WHEREAS the applicant has l�OT met the burden of proof required to support his said applic�tion; and WHEREAS the Planning Comzn�ssion finds that the application does NOT meet all of the fcllo�;ing requirements: a. Encourage� the m�st appropriate use of land, b. Conserves and stabilizes the value of property, c. Provides for adequate open spaces for light and air, d. Permits adequate control of fires, e� Promotes the health, safety and public welfare, f, Provides f�r the orderly development of the City, and g. Is advantageous to th.e property and improvements in the zoning district and ne.ighborhood in which the property is locatEd; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLJED° That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the USE PERMI�I' be, and trie same is hereby denied; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the findings quoted above and on page two be approved and adopted, an.d that the Secretary be, and is hereby directed to notify the parties a.ffected by this decision, (Continued on page 2� - 1 -