Loading...
Reso 599 80,000.6 1-V-69 RESOLUTION N0. 599 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING THE GRANTING OF A VARIANCE exempting Lot No. 4 from Condition 13 of Planning Commission Resolution No. 468, which condition requests that a Tentative Map covering the entire adjacent area must be submitted prior to any lot split. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- APPLICANT: Manuel Marchant ADDRESS: 10320 South Sunnyvale-Saratoga Road, Cupertino, California SUBMITTED January 9, 1969 LOCATION: North side of Lindy Lane, approx. 100 feet west of Terra Bella Drive ZONE: R1-20 AREA: 1.224 acres --------------------------------------------------------------------------- (Continued from Page 1) CONDITIONS AND FURTHER FINDINGS: None --------------------------------------------------------------------------- PASSED AND AIlQPTED this 27th day of January, 1969, at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote: AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, Hirshon, Irwin, Puetz, Frolich NAYS: None APPROVED: � � Donald A. Frolich, Chairman Planning Commission ATTEST: Q�� �l�/V✓ �►M Adde Laurin Senior Planner -2- C I`I' Y �! F �, U P E R'I` I N 0 City Hall� 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertin�, California 95014 �I'elephone � (�08) 252-�+505 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CCMMISSION OF TKE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDTNG THE GRANTING GF A VkRIANCF WHEREAS the Planning Commission of the City �f Cupertino received an appl.ication f°or a VARIANCE, a� stated on Page 2; and WHEREAS the applicant rias m.et the burden of proof required to support his said application; and WHEREAS the application showso l, That there are special conditions or exceptional characteristics in the nature of° the property to be aff'ected, or that its loca- tion or it� surrounding� are such as will permit the Commission to make a determinatior� that. a literal enforcement of the Ordinance would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships; and 2, That the granting of the application is necessary for the preser�vation and enjoyment of substantial property rights; and 3. That the hearings shova that the granting of the application will not materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the property which is the subject of the application, and that the use �f' said property in the manner in which it is pro- posed to be used vaill n.ot be materially detrimental to the pu'plic vaelfare or injuriaus to the value of property or improvements located in said surroundings; NOW THEREFORE, BE I'T RESOLVED� That af'ter careful consideration of maps, fac'cs, exhibits and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for the VARIANCE be, and the same is, here�y recommended for approval to the City Council of the City of Cupertino for appropriate action, subject to the conditions stated on Page 2; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVEDa That the af°orementioned findings are approved and adopted, and that the Secretary be, and is hereby, directed to notify the parties affected by this decision, (Continued on Page 2) - 1 -