Reso 596 80,000.6
26-Z-68
RESOLUTION N0. 596
OF THE PLANNI�G COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
DENYING TH� GRANTING OF A PREZONING from County Residential
Single-family (R1-10) to General Commercial (CG)
APPLICANTS: Mitzi Tawa and Edgar Self
ADDRESS: 4508 Theresa Avenue, Fremont, California
SUBMITTED: December 27, 1968
LOCATION: Northeast corner of Foothill Boulevard and Cupertino Road
ZONE: County R1-10 AREA: Approx. .59 acre
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Continued from Page 1)
FURTHER FINDINGS:
1. The lot size is such that it makes a good development imprac.tical.
2. Cooperation and coordination with owners of ad�acent and nearby lots
shoul� be sought.
3. The entire surrounding area should be studied.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of January, 1969, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the
following rall call vote:
AYES: Commissioners Buthenuth, Hirshon, Irwin, Puetz, Frolich
NAYS: None
APPROVED:
��� �
Donald A. Frolich
ATTEST: Chairman, Planning Commission
l�- G'LP� C��G��L��
Adde Laurin
Senior Planner
-2-
C I T Y 0 F C U P E R T I N 0
City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 9501�
Telephone: ��08� 252-�505
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING �OMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
DENYING THE GRANTING OF A ZONE CHANGE
41HEREAS the attache-d application has been submitted to the City of
Cupertino requesting a change of zone in the zoning regulations of
the City, as stated on Page 2, and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission has held at least one public hear-
ing in regard to the application on the date as noted on said
application; and
WHEREAS the Planning Commission has duly considered and heard all
evidence submitted in regard to said application; and
WHEREAS �r��.-:=�°ssary public notices have been given as required
by the zoning ordinance of the City of Cupertino.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
l. That the Plannii�g Commission finds that the proposed zone
change does not meet all of the following requirements:
a. Encourage the most appropriate use of land,
b. Conserve and stabilize the value of property,
c. Provide for adequate open spaces for light and air,
d . Permit ad�q� _, ! �:: �. . ��_�trol of fires,
e. Promote the health, safety and public welfare,
f. Provide for tize orderly development of the City,
g. Be advantageous to the property and improvements
in the zoning district and neighborhood in which
the property is located.
(Continued on page 2�
-1-