.02 DIR-2010-28 T-Mobile appeal OFFICE OF COMMU VITY DEVELOPMENT
CTTY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENL' E• CLTI'ERTINO, CA 95014-3255
C U P E RT I N O (408) 777-3308 • FAX (�08) 777 • planning@cupertino.org
PLANNING COMMI!�SION STAFF REPORT
Agenda Item No. iZ Agenda Date: November 9, 2010
Application: DIR-2010-28
Applicant: Dayna Aguirre, Sutro Consulting for T-Mobile
Appellant: Shaul Berger
Application Summary: Appeal of a Direci or's Minor Modification decision to allow the
installation of a personal wireless service f�icility, consisting of three panel antennas and
associated equipment on an existing PG&F, pole located in front of 11371 Bubb Road.
RECOMMENDATION:
The Planning Commission has the option to make one of the following
recommendations to the City Council:
a) Uphold the Director of Comrlunity Development's decision; or
b) Uphold the appeal; or
c) Uphold the appeal with modifications.
Staff recommends that the Planning Con�ussion recommend upholding the Director's
decision per the model resolution (Attachnlent 1).
BACKGROUND:
On September 7, 2010, the Director of Cornmunity Development approved a Director's
Minor Modification to allow a T-Mobile personal wireless service facility (microcell) "
mounted on an existing utility pole located in the public right-of-way in front of 11371
Bubb Road. It consisted of three panel ant �nnas fastened by a bracket to the power pole
& four associated equipment cabinets mounted directly to the same pole (Attachment
2).
Planning Commissioners, Council MembE�rs and property owners within 1,000 feet of
the property were mailed notices of the D:.rector's action. A couple of noticed property
owners expressed their opposition to the a pproval decision and one chose to appeal the
decision, including an opposition petition avith twelve signatures (Attachment 3).
DISCUSSION:
- _ _T-he-aPpeiiarrt=s-appC-ai-i�=��-�-a�e�g��pert� ,.,,. _�..,,�. . fel����^�a:o� �����- --
discussion in italics. Where the applicant ��as requested by staff to provide information,
that information is so noted:
2-1
DIR-2010-28 Appeal November 9, 2010
11371 Bubb Road Page 2
1) T-Mobile's proposed antenna with a m�iximum ERP (effective radiating power) of
360 watts is a regular "high power" antenna for mobile cellular communications
without any sense of "microcell." This type of antenna is normally installed in a
separate, high tower or on top of high k�uilding far from the populated residence
area. It is not appropriate near Bubb Rc�ad, which has many housing blocks, and an
elementary and middle schools. T-Mot�ile's statement is misleading.
Staff Response: The term "microcell" wa� used by City staff, not the applicant. Wikipedia
defines microcell as follows:
"A microcell is a cell in a mobile phone neiwork served by a low power cellular base station
(tower), covering a limited area such as a r,zall, a hotel, or a transportation hub. A microcell
is usually larger than a picocell, though thE distinction is not always clear. A microcell uses
power control to limit the radius of its coverage area. �
Typically the range of a microcell is less th zn two kilometers wide, a icp ocell is 200 meters
or less, and a emtocell is on�the order �� meters.� although AT&T calls its product, with
a range of 40 feet (12 m), a mrcrocell .
The typical 3-antenna wireless facility that is proposed in the City has an ERP of 950 —1050
watts. The proposed facility has about 1/3 c f the ERP at 360 watts. The attached existing
and proposed coverage maps (Attachment •�) depict a diameter of less than one mile or I.S8
kilometers, which is in agreement with the ��efinition above.
Regardless how the personal wireless service facility is described, such facilities must
comply with federal guidelines limiting hur:an exposure to radio frequency energy. The
standard is 1.0 milliwatt per centimeter sqa�ared (mw/cm The proposed facility is
calculated to cause exposures from 0. 0012 to 0.0022 mw/cm which is well within federal
standards.
2) The current federal standard referred by the applicant is for an average slow-fading
flat propagation environment and does not apply to our area because of the hilly
terrain and the dense populations in th � area. Long-term exposure to such radiation
is hazardous to a persori s health. Students at Regnart Elementary School, which is
less than 500 feet away, will be exposec� to about 540 mV/meter radiation. Several
hour exposure can cause harmful problem�for students, especially younger children
less than 6 years old based on the radic health analytical model published in the
2004 World Wireless Congress, San Francisco.
Staff Response: The consultant, Hamme� t� Edison, Consulting Engineers, states that the
Federal Communications Commission (FC�) standard cited in the radio frequency energy
report (Attachment 5) is not based on "an �iverage slow fading, flat propagation
environment" nor on any other propagatio:l assumption. The FCC standard establishes a
' e�vwti�s��1e-e�pes�r��ll�1�€}-1e-���-l�e�r-dleTss-�k�r�-a: persatt-r�a���locut�d --- - - --_ ____
2-2
DIR-2010-28 Appeal November 9, 2010
11371 Bubb Road Page 3
Hammett � Edison also responds that there are numerous studies of the effects of exposure to
radio frequency energy. Such s�udies are considered by the standard-setfing bodies in this
country and abroad when they establish safety standards. In the judgement of the FCC, the
current standard of 1.00 milliwatt per centi neter squared applies to continuous exposures
and provides a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size or
health. This facility will comply with the f�deral standard. See the response to Appeal point
#1.
3) The asserted area is on the gradually up hill side of the road and there are many
multistory houses. Therefore to meet tlie requirement of this special environment,
the proposed antennas must be at least ��ver 100 feet to satisfy the safety issue for
people living within 500 feet of this facility.
Staff Response: Hammett � Edison reports (Attachment 6) that for the proposed 360-watt
facility, the calculated power density has already fallen below the MPE at a distance of 12
feet in front of the antennas. At distanees oF100 feet or 500 feet the RF exposure is far less.
4) The radio pollution depends on both th�� received radio signal strength and the
exposure time. As time increases the pc�llution will significantly increase in a non-
linear manner. For an adult (age 20 to 40) such an effect may not be so serious if
only exposed within a few hours for distances less than 300 feet. However, for
adolescents, young children, babies, seriors or pregnant women, such radiation can
cause disorder, defectiveness and other health concerns. On Bubb Road, there are
many sedentary senior citizens and dis� bles, living in 2-story houses that are less
than 200 feet from the proposed facility
Staff Response: The Hammett � Edison !Zadio Frequency Report (Attachment 5) concludes
that the calculated radio frequency energy exposures (measured at the ground level and the
second story elevafions of nearby houses) fr��m the proposed T-Mobile faeilify are:
➢ 0.12 % of the MPE for all ground lez�el exposures, and
➢ 0.22 % of the MPE for second floor residential exposures of any nearby residence.
Both figures meet the federal safety standar�� of 1.00 milliwatt per centimeter squared for radio
frequency energy in the radio communica `ions frequency range licensed by T-Mobile. The
above mentioned federal standard applies � o the general population for continuous exposure
(24 hours per day, 7 days per week), regard�'ess of age, gender or health of the individual.
Federal law, the 1996 Telecommunications Act- Section 704, subsecfion 7(D), states:
"no state or local governmental entity may regulate the placement, construction, or
modification of personal wireless service fa�;ilities on the basis of environmental effects of
radio frequency emissions to the extent that such emissions comply with FCC
xg�n finri c . ��
;?-3
DIR-2010-28 Appeal November 9, 2010
11371 Bubb Road Page 4
5) The proposed antennas are located between Regnart Elementary School and
Kennedy Middle School. Students rot.te of travel will be through the radiated area
and traffic congestion will lengthen the .r exposure time.
Staff Response: See the response to Appe�tl Point #4.
6) Based on our experiences, expertises z nd judgement, this is not a lawful practice to
install a high-power antenna in a low-height pole in such a crowded residential area.
Staff Response: Through its Wireless Facilities Master Plan and Wireless
Communications Facilities Ordinance (CN C Section 19.108), the City strives to provide
adequate wireless communications coveragE� in a manner that is in compliance with federal
law and mitigates potentially, visually intr.�sive effects of wireless infrastructure. To cover
largely residential areas of Cupertino, the 1�laster Plan prefers public properties, churches,
schools and existing utility poles and towers to mount wireless antennas.
The usage of utility poles and towers for �uch facilities is allowed, regardless of the zoning
district or setback from residences, if federal safety standards for radio frequency energy
exposure are met. The proposed facility will be in compliance with local and federal laws.
7� In a more detailed calculation on the west and south uphill sides of the antenna,
many houses are above 30 feet high frc�m the ground level of the antennas, so by the
proposed 2 degree down tilt and 28 degree -3dB beam width with 44 feet antenna
height, the lower 3dB beam width hori �on is only about 0.03 mile which is about 158
feet. The path loss there at frequency 1900 Mhz is about 71 dB. If the transmitting
power is 300W, which is about 55 dF�m, the received signal at 158 feet is about -
16dBm, which is near 1700 mV/meter c�f field strength - highly dangerous!
Staff Response: The antennas are proposE�d to be mounted at a height of 44 feet and 6 inches.
According to Hammett F� Edison's letter (Attachment 6), all spaces beyond 12 feet from the
antennas are at or below the MPE level. T Tere is no location to the west, south, east, or north
accessible to the general population that �uould cause an exposure in excess of the federal
safety standard.
8) We suggest an alternative to the City and T-Mobile - install a high antenna on the
Cupertino hills. This will address covE�rage not only on Bubb Road and not only for
T-Mobile, but also for all other carri ers. This will address another problematic
coverage area of Regnart/Lindy Lane.
Staff Response: The southern and west�rn portions of Cupertino can be characterized as
having very poor to no cell phone receptior . Inquiries from wireless carriers indicate they are
looking at multiple sites for personal wi��eless service facilities, including hillsides, Utill�
___ pej ut� _ i'Y1�thZS oPnvranhic are.a of Cut�erti_rtn_ (;i7�en thn -
low-power of these sites, multiple sites i�i multiple locations will need to be developed to
provide acceptable cell phone coverage to this area.
2-4
DIR-2010-28 Appeal November 9, 2010
11371 Bubb Road Page 5
Prepared by: Colin Jung, AICP, Senior Plar�ner
Reviewed by: Approved by:
�L -
y ao Aarti Shrivastava
City Planner Community Development Director
ATTACHMENTS:
Attachment 1: Model Resolution
Attachment 2: Director's Minor Modification Memorandum dated September 7, 2010
Attachment 3: Appellant's Appeal Form dated September 20, 2010
Attachment 4: Existing and Proposed Cov �rage Maps
Attachment 5: T-Mobile West Corp. Propc sed Base Station (Site No. SF24189D)/11371
Bubb Road, Cupertino, Cal:fornia/Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc.
Consulting Engineers datecl July 28, 2010
Attachment 6: Letter from Hammett & Edi� on, Inc. Consulting Engineers dated October
26, 2010
Attachment 7: Photosimulations (3)
Attachment 8: Plan Set
G:planning/pdreport/Appeals/2010/DIR-2010-28 �ppeal.doc
?-5
Attachment 1
DIR-2010-28
CITY OF (;UPERTINO �
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLL: TION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
RECOMMENDING DENIAL O]i AN APPEAL OF A DIRECTOR'S
MINOR MODIFICATION ALL(�WING A PERSONAL WIRELESS
SERVICE FACILITY, CONSISTII��G OF THREE PANEL ANTENNAS
AND FOUR ASSOCIATED EQUIP YIENT CABINETS ON AN EXISTING
UTILIT'Y POLE A'C 11371 BUBB ROAD
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of tlie City of Cupertino received an appeal of a
Director's Minor Mod�fication application, fi: e no. DIR-2010-28, as described in Section II of
this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices hav�� been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and th � Planning Commission has held one or more
public hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the project changes are deemed r,unor in nature; and
WHEREAS, the personal wireless service facility is not located in an inappropriate location,
in that the facility meets federal safety limits =or radio frequency energy exposure for ground
level, second floor residential locations and Ytearby land uses, such as a school; and that the
facility is sited in an appropriate location and designed in accordance with the City's
Wireless Master Plan and Wireless Communi =ations Facilities Ordinance; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, the appeal of Dire�:tor's Minor Modification, file no. DIR2010-28 is
hereby recommended for denial; and
That the subconclusions upon which the finclings and conditions specified in this resolution
are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. DIR-2010-
28 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of November 9, 2010, and
ara ;nrnr,�nratar� hv rPfPr�t�ac thrn�ah fullv gP+ fnrth hPrPin
_ r � - - _ _ _ - - __ _ _._
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
2-6
Resolution No. 11371 Bubb Road Micro�:ell Facility November 9, 2010
Page 2
Application No.: DIR-2010-28 (appeal)
Applicant: Dayna Aguirre, Sutro Coitsulting, for T-Mobile
Property Owner: Pacific, Gas & Electric
Location: in front of 11371 Bubb Ro �d
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERE D BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Director's Minor Modification Approv<<1 Memorandum, file no. DIR-2010-28 with
attachments 1 through 6 dated Septemher 7, 2010.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RFSERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approva] set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation r �quirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to
Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a
. statement of the amount of such Eees, and a description of the dedications,
reservations, and other exactions. Yc►u are hereby further notified that the 90-day
approval period in which you may p��otest these fees, dedications, reservations, and
other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail
to file a protest within this 90-day pe��iod complying with all of the requirements of
Section 66020, you will be legally barre � from later challenging such exactions.
3. ABANDONMENT
If after installation, the aerial is not u�ed for its permitted purpose for a continuous
period of 18 months, said antennae a1d associated facilities shall be removed. The
applicant shall bear the entire cost of d��molition and removal.
4. EXPIRATION DATE
This Director's Minor Modification shall expire ten (10) years after the effective date of
the permit. The applicant may apply f��r a renewal of the minor modification at which
. time the Director of Community DEVelopment may review the state of wireless
communication and camouflage techn �logies to determine if the visual impact of the
personal wireless facility can be reduced.
5. CAMOUFLAGING OF EQUIPMENT
All cables shall be enclosed in cor duit. The mounting brackets, conduit and
equipment cabinets shall be painted to match the color of the utility pole.
, 2
2—�
Resolution No. 11371 Bubb Road Micro�ell Facility November 9, 2010
Page 3
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of November 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertuio, State of California, by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMNIISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COIVIMISSIONERS:
ATTEST: APPROVED:
Aarti Shrivastava Paul Brophy, Chair
Director of Community Development . Cupertino Planning Commission
g:/planning/pdreport/res/2010/DIR-2010-0 res APPEAL. ioc �
3
2—$
Attachment 2
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertir o, California 95014, (408) 777-3308
To: Mayor and City Council membe:�s
Chairman and Planning Commi��sioners
From: Approved by Aarti Shrivastava, Director of Community Development �
Prepared by Colin Jung, Senior I'lanner
Date: September 7, 2010
Subject: Director's Minor Modification (DIR-2010-28) to allow the addition of a
personal wireless service facility (microcell), consisting of three panel antennas
and four associated equipment cabinets on an existing utility pole in the public
right-of-way in front of 11371 Bt_bb Road.
Chapter 19.132 of the Cupertino Municipal Code allows for admulistrative
approval of minor changes in a prc�ject. The Director reports her decision
to the City Council and Plann'vlg Commission and notices property
owners within 1,000-foot radius in time to allow any Council memUer,
Planning Commissioner or member of the public to appeal the decision
within fourteen calendar days.
BACKGROUND
The applicant, Dayna Aguirre, representvlg T-Mobile, is proposing to establish a
personal wireless service facility (microcell) mounted on an existing utility pole located
in the public right-of-way in front of 11371 Bubb Road. It consists of three panel
antennas fastened by a bracket to the po�n�er pole and four associated equipment
cabinets mounted directly to the same po'e (Attachment 1).
Microcells are low-power personal wireless service facilities designed to serve a small
area. In this particular case, this facility is designed to provide PCS telephone
coverage to a small area around southern Bubb Road and a portion of RainUow Drive
(Attachment 2).
This facility falls under the recently adop :ed, revised wireless communic�tions facilities
ordinance (CMC chapter 19.108) that per�nits such facilities on utility poles, regardless
of proximity to a residential property linE� as long as the facility meets federal safety
standards for radio frequency emissions.
2-9
DIR-2010-28 Bubb Road ROW (in front of 11371 Bubb Road) Page 2
Se tember 7, 2010
�-�- �,.� . t ,. � .�;; �:� •:. . �► I � . �
; ,� ,
e�'� r -, . . �-a i �� �..'� � � • r.�. � -.�: � ��" � f
. _ �� � ,�. i ' ' � , ' . . �'�-�+,�'.. ';�; !�;'�'' �. _ _�; ,-�
_ �. . _ _� , , , ..`� �^ �� ai� .���-'° � -
_�' �` ' '^. �` f � I ��,i�l�.� � . � :'� • ���.J!� �.�..�.�!�^�
� R'i . . 'd j�`�' . I �� � � ^r
��,�.�,�'S M. �' _ �� 1,,. _ r�.
� �
+��� 5 +�}s--?Cc� r. �Ar �„��.
1ti -, , Cc � •' g.
I ` �� . R i' ��' ��. � r""r- . ,�.�� __ . �_c, � . .- , � .- ' .�: . '�
. , � �� � �;
e :: .�i �'a `� '�,.� ,: �'�� f v E �. ,�-�-'T"-r.�/-; "r .
• . � ,' �
� �"� � 'i. . - .t ,` � . . � a-- T �.,,- a 4"'`'' • �ii�
� � r � • { ` � ,+.
���� '�''. 1 �� �� ~ � � � • ' � .� . � . ..`'. _'
* . � +..._ "` d �,�4', �� ._ . ,t � � % � �
�: _ � ��': � � �� • %'.' � ;�i`= �� � � .t
\ ; '7 :,� i ,�; �; , k. ��:. ..�`' " ,, . ��� � 1
� .,t�� � i .rjr�i�tl . '�. ''s , �. b"� �.�. C� . ._ �..�:`,�Ir ��e3,3�
, ��'';:. .✓ �t
t� . �,T.'N � �.: .
. �� 1� " . �''' 1 '� � • ,,f , . ' ' " � • ..� • � *~`� � t ���f . 1 sk�� ��
� ` - 1, • .fF'n ` • :. ': �� lI f r �' � f� . �
_ f '�,�► ; �� \� ,��,�.�, i' .�.�� ~' '�� ('Y` °kt`"�'�
y � � + �. r 1 ^ �'� 1 , F`'� � � ,� ''T�,�
� � ' ' ' �'ti' i _ j , 1' �. �,� �, �ru,
�,'', .� - : : �
•r . . ar A . :� } j� w i� F � , �; � � ' a' � �. � � � � : �`� y. �'7�
'� ,t� . , � °? _ ( } '� � C��".:� . . P
rC, �p s�' , � ''�d��' l •.� � �!i [� . ' � y ;.
� y �� ,'.a �'�'?F,, � � . 1' � �� '' �� _ ,� — - 2- `+ _�4"� i _ 1�. � . !.�' • } .�� � _�.y, � _
" �� . �, � . � i`� :. �'_. i_:'' � _.__. � �
r � ,.
�; - � �' � .h . � c � � � :��" , t , i, �;
{nl�z� � ��' .. � . �i� ' .. _ ..
�q' . � ��R fi � . �° .��' �;` � I � I T' � � ,4 � � � .
Y •g,������� � , i� �l.t __ � _►t , 4�r� �'.r ..e
�+�. �: ��,t� . - ��� +�� T = Ly f � _ , �4 ' M !` � � „� �
r . ., � � `�� } ' � , �� , �� �
t.,Y �x, . �� �'f� � y, 1 : ' � � �O'i �Y ,�"
� „� • .�G�'. �� '"r.�'�� �: . ' -- w • +�N�,7 . � # �[ - � T .3lL�-.s� i ir
. ...� .�» � � �
� '� � � -- - � O .� �a?.
"-E�� S ���' T " r�s�' f �P � • \ � �' � �� E�
���`,� ��� j i � � r �� � X �. \ , c �p` .�-�--. �� � i '
`�� �;�l: {`�' ' �''%F?,Zpj,, '� �.. ' � : 4 `?. -7 ��'r;� p� , . . ��,- ' � �. �, �
.. � 'n .��.� ',�.' i� � � �� �. � `y ry - .i
� F�'J ��fl r * � � `..� ���� f 31� � � � �� �'�Y ( �' � � , ` '�� jti"�, �.. . .. . f ��X .r. _ �. .
� a _ , �!� ` l� `�j ;'�.. �. � � � ��R —�"v ���" !� !��"� �:1�'�� ;� � �
,l � . ��, ,r �. q.� °• ' `:��� ' � ��. . � t• ' 1 ' ..�. � .JII�����Ii61 . � � . . —_ �...a +�.� "�
�..� � ,�y ' � __... _ .
t
s '.. F Sr ,, `. '. � ! '�f:_ �ls+i s � M f ..
� P
� � � � . '�T�. . :".� a •� t .- �� ��� ,� . � 1 — ti � S{' S
' � ��'' , � w �,�'�'� � ;� ��l � � �� V ?-1 � � + t r � 4 �
� �1 � �.., r. _ � �- . . . w r ::� 'd.�,�'�,,'+ � � c�l 1 �.t �
t �`a , �,�'. " �» � .
• + r� : f Z . ! ' t � ` � � '� r�; �
• ��.�� � ' �`� ' • �� ,' . ,:�...,� � � . � , � � : ti.
=��(� .i ����.. .�� � � �� ( � y I �, • � t � i �a._. � .-, _'��
? '� . . '. � � . .. � i • _"
e � ,,,� " r .3� a'��' �' , `� ��,,�� 4 ;� t ( . , X
� �
� :' �y �
� �l: ��, � � �' ���
Y� . j ��1 p
� Y' r Y�. a� � ... .� . , d 7��„ t .a.
,e"�' . , p., / � � [1. � ("�.' , �� _ i;� �..5.� Ta .��.'� � r � �� s y ^t
v�w.�• . I�� ������pPN� r f '� �f9• � ..` '�,
( , � f��¢" � � !/� • �'
. � d a • ' . i .., � , ±%
, l �•..�.,...
� .... j :.t,�,�� . c � b �. � ; �� , � ' , � '�: � c � `-r � w. , � � � � � ..
J Z r 1• � y}i✓ , �ip'�� -�� � +1W P 5 i �'
1 t J � .. . �
� . ��y x � �"'"� /- "'' . �� k �'�,� ''� .w F
� � J^' I � � � I � ' . •i' . .... � �� —' � �1� � � . .. . ��
� �CJl. � �iJ l\. � L
Proposed Microcell
0
DISCUSSION
The proposed wireless facility coinplies with the City's Ordinance. The antennas are at
about 45 feet where 55 feet is allowed. The antennas are mounted on a utility pole,
which exempts them from the residential setUack requirement of 75 feet, as long as
Federal safety standards for radio frequency energy are met (see discussions on Radio
Frequency Assessment). All ot the associated equipment cabinets are mounted on the
same side as the antenna to ensure a clear pathway for climbing linemen. In addition,
the equipment location is on the west side of the pole in order to address the wireless
communications coverage in that portion of tlze City (Attachment 3).
--------- -- e propose aci�i� a��corn�lre�with re ��s�a� i��es- �s«��, ---
which articulates a visual preference for microcells in residential neighborhoods since
2
2-10
DIR-2010-28 Bubb Road ROW (in �ront of 11371 Bubb Road) Page 3
September 7, 2010
such a facility can take advantage of existing vertical structures such as utility poles, in
lieu of building new vertical structures.
Radio Frequenc�Eners� Assessment
The applicant has commissioned a radi�� frequency energy assessment prepared Uy
Hammett & Edison, Inc. to estimate the 1�vels of radio frequency energy generated by
the proposed T-Mobile microcell site and evaluate those energy levels again.st adopted
federal safety limits for human exposur�� to radio frequency energy (Attachment 4).
The federal limits apply to continuous ex��osures and are intended to provide a prudent
margin of safety for all persons, regardles;� of age, gender, size or health.
The calculated, ground-level, maximum RF exposure due to the proposed T-Mobile
facility is 0.12% of the applicable publi � exposure limit (1 milliwatt per centimeter
squared). Second-story residential expo:�ure to the west is slightly higher, 0.22% of the
applicable public exposure limit. BotY� calculated levels are well below adopted
federal safety standards.
A�encU Review
Project plans were routed to the Cupertino Technology, Information and
Communications Commission (TICC) fo:� their commentary. 'The TIC Commissioner
noted that the IZF emission exposure wa;� well-within the federal safety standard; that
there was no serious aesthetic issue witr_ placing the equipment on an existing utility
pole; and the radio coverage will ccver a serious gap in T-Mobile's coverage
(Attachment 5).
ACTION
The Director of Community Developmen: deems the modification minor and approves
the microcell facility with the following cc�nditions of approval. State law requires a
minimum 10-year permit for personal wi��eless service facilities.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on Exhibits title �: " T-Mobile West Corporation/A Delaware
Corporation/SF24189D/PG&E REGNART/ON BUBB RD. BETWEEN
FOLKSTONE DR. & CONRA] �IA CT. /IN FRONT OF 113�1 BUBB
ROAD/CUPERTIlVO, CA 95014" ��repared by Michael Wilk Architecture dated
9/3/10 and consisting of ten sheet� labeled T-1, T-2, LS1, A-1 through A-4, PS-1,
REF-1 and REF-2 except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this
resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTI�R EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approv set forth herein may include certain fees,
_ __ - . .
- • -- - _
e ica ion t, � ement� •
Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute
3
�:-11
DIR-2010-28 Bubb Road ROW (in Eront of 11371 Bubb Road) Page 4
September 7, 2010
written notice of a statement of the �mount of such fees, and a description of the
dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified
that the 90-day approval period in v�hich you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pL.rsuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),
has begun. If you fail to file a prot�st within this 90-day period complying with
all of the requirements of Section �;6020, you will be legally barred from later
challenging such exactions.
3. ABANDONMENT
If after installation, the aerial is not used for its permitted purpose for a continuous
period of 18 months, said antenna � and associated facilities shall be removed.
The applicant shall bear the entire cost of demolition and removal.
4. EXPIRATION DATE
This Director's Minor Modification shall expire ten (10) years after the effective
date of the permit. The applicalt may apply for a renewal of the minor
modification at which time the Dire ,tor of Community Development may review
the state of wireless communication and camouflage technologies to determine if
the visual impact of the personal wireless facility can be reduced.
5. CAMOUFLAGING OF EQUIPMEN' C
All cables shall be enclosed in co�tduit. The mounting brackets, conduit and
equipment cabinets shall be painted to match the color of the utility pole.
This Director's approv�l is effective Septe mber 7, 2010. The fourteen calendar day
appeal period will expire on September 2:_, 2010.
Enclosures:
Attachment 1 Photosinulations of microcell facility (3)
Attachment 2 T-Mobi:.e Existing & Proposed Coverage Maps
Attachment 3 Email fi om PG&E
Attachment 4 IZFR As �essment of T-Mobile West Corp. Proposed
Base St��tion, (Site No. SF24189D),11371 Bubb Road,
Cupertino, California
� Attachment 5 Email c��mmunications from TIC Commissioner
Attachment 6 Plan Se�:
Referenced attachments that may not be included witli tlzis rnailed report are available
in the Planning Department located �t Cit Hall and may also be viewed at tlze
City's website at �,�a�u�.cupe��tino.v�•Q. Se�ect the link to "Public Records" at t12e top bar,
t12en "Planning Department" folder, the�t "DIR Approvals" folder, tl�en "2010" folder.
� Select file nurnber DIR-2010-28.
G/plan�iing/PDREPORT/DlRreyortsR010/DIIZ-2010-28.doc
4
2-12 .
Attachment 3
�
����-__���
City af Cupertino �� � 4 ��
10300 7'orre Avenue
Cuperti no, CA 95014
��1P€RTIt�1� (408�'777-3223 ���'���[�� ��� ��-���
APPEAI.
DIR-2010- 28
1. Application No.
2. Applicant(s) Name: Dayna A€zxirre T-Mobile
3. Appellant{s) �Tame: Shaul Ber �,er
Address 1�371 But►b Rd., Cupertino
Phone Number �`�8) 666-1b77
Email
dspmaste rQyahoo.com
4. Please check one:
Q Appeal a decision of Dire�;tor of Community Development
Q Appeal a decision of Direr,tor of Public Works
� Appeal a decision of Plarniing Commission
� Appeal a decision of Desi ;n Review Committee
Q Appeal a decision of Codf; Enforcement
5. Date of determination of Director or mailing of notice of City decision:
September7, 2010
_ 6. Basis of appeal____ ______
I and my neighbors believe that the proposed T-Mobile antenna is highly hazardous to the
health of our families and our children, not mentioning the nearby schools. We claim that
the technical analysis is incorre �t because it did not account for the hilly profile of our
area. See more details in attach+;d document.
Signature(s)
�
Please complete form, include appeal fee of $162.00 pursuant to Resolution No. 09-051
($155.00 for massage application appeal:�), and return to the attention of the City Clerk,
i-13
Petition for Withdrawal of �►pproval of a T-Mobile Microcell
Prouosal, fil�� no. DIR 2010-28
My name is Shaul Berger, a resident on 1.371 Bubb Road, location of the proposed
antenna.
My petition is supported by many people :n the vicinity of the proposed antenna (see
attached list). We believe that additional �:0 house owners livi.ng nearby will join the
petition in the coming days. This petition does not include all the unaware people who
are walking/driving their children along F ubb Rd. and are stuck in daily morni.ng traffic
jam in front of the proposed antenna.
This petition is supported by a thorough t�;chnical evaluation done by Prof. Willie Lu and
myself. Willie Lu is a senior radio transmission engineer for about twenty years, and was
a professor of radio antenna group of De� artment of Electrical Engineering in Stanford
University as well as former member of L�.S. FCC Technological Advisory Council. I
have been involved with the wireless indiistry for the past 20 years and continue to
consult in this area of wireless communications. Therefore, we believe that we are fully
qualified to iniriate this petition and requf:st for withdrawal of this approval of a T-Mobile
microcell proposal, file no. DIR-2010-28.
The reasons and grounds for this petition are based on the following observations and
investigations:
1. T-Mobile's proposed antenna with ma�;: ERP of 360 watts is a regular "high-power"
antenna for mobile cellular communicatic►ns without any sense of "nucrocell". This type
of antenna is normally installed in a sepa��ate, high tower or on top of high building far
from the populated residence area. Bubb +oad is near this junction and is very dense -
with many housing blocks, elementary school and middle school. T-Mobile's statement
is an obvious intention of "misleading".
�
2. The current federal ruling and standarc. as refened by the applicant can not be applied
for our particular topography. Rather, the cited standard is for an average slow-fading flat
propagation environment wherein most s ituations, there are not so dense populations in
the area and it is not for such uphill area. A person exposed in such a radiated area
may not be harmed within a certain short period of time, but can be hazazdous to that
' person's health if staying or living there f�r a considerable period of time. The direct
distance from the �nosed antenna to th�; Regnart Elementary School is only less than
- _ - -- - -_
eet. ase on e ra o propaga ion mo e or e surroun g area, e emen
�:-14
students will be steeped with about 540m V/meter radiation. If the student just sta.ys on
campus for several m.i.nutes to an hour, it �nay be harmless. However, if they stay in such
a dangerous environment for several houx s, it can cause harmful problems for kids
especially six yeazs old and under, based ��n the radio health analytical model published
in the 2004 World Wireless Congress, Sai Francisco.
3. The asserted azea is on the gradually u� hill side of the road and there are many multi-
story houses. Therefore, to meet the requi-ement of this special environment, the
proposed antenna must be at least over 100 feet to satisfy the safety issue of the radio
transmission for the people livi.ng within :i00 feet of this strong radiated antenna.
4. The radio pollution to the human being relies on both the received radio signal strength
and the time exposed in such a radiated er�vironment. As time increases, the pollution will
significantly increase in a non-li.near mawier. For an adult of age 20 through 40, such an
effect may not be so serious if only expos�;d within a few hours of a distance less than
300 feet. However, for adolescents, young children, babies, seniors or pregnant women,
such radiation can cause disorder, defecti��eness and other health concerns. On the nearby
Bubb Road, there are many senior citizen" and disables living in their house all da.y long,
and many of them live on the second-ston� of their house, which is within less than 200
feet of the proposed antenna (including oL t house!).
5. The proposed antenna is located at the j unction of the Regnart Elementary School and
Kennedy Middle School. In the morni.ng and afternoon, there are hundreds of kids
walking and biking to both schools and th�; adjacent Monta. Vista High School. Because
of severe traffic congest'ron in tlus section, kids can stay much longer in this radiated
azea, especially walking within the zone o:'the radiati.ng antenna. Based on the antenna
sector planning, the radiation can fully co`�er Folkestone Dr and nearby streets, the main
slreets to Regnart Elementary School, and when in students dropoff/pickup time,
hundreds of pazents and kids are passing tluough or on these streets.
,
6. Based on our experiences, expertises and judgement, this.is not a lawful practice to
install a high-powered antenna in a low-he ight pole i.n such a crowded residential area.
7. In a more detailed calculation on the we st and south uphill sides of the antenna, many
houses aze above 30 feet high from the ground level of the antenna, so by the proposed 2
' ea.ni �tlr4� � �
2-15
the lower 3 dB beam width horizon is onl;,� about 0.03 mile which is about 158 feet. The
path loss there at frequency 1900Mhz is a�out 71dB. If the transmitting power is 300W
which is about SSdBm, the received signal at 158 feet is about -16dBm which is
near 1700mV/meter of field strength - highly dangerous!
8. We suggest an alternative to city of Cu��ertino and T-Mobile - install a high antenna on
Cupertino hills. This will address coverag � not only on Bubb Rd. and not only for T-
Mobile but also for a11 other carriers. This will address another problematic coverage
area (mentioned in your document) of Re€ �art/Lindy Lane.
To protect the health, safety and interest o f the community and citizens, I strongly
petition to withdraw the approval of this project with file no. DIlt-2010-28.
We are collecting the signatures from the : ocal community, and reserve rights to seek
legal protocols to protect the safety of our community and citizens if this petition is not
successful.
If you have any further question regarding this petition, please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Sincerely,
Shaul Berger
. -
�;-16
0
;:.
I
�
J
etition to Removal of T-Mobile Cell proposal, file no. DIR-2010-28
N e Address E-maif Signature
1 � �.�e�,. � 11.3 °�� . �c1�.� �'
/!35' �c � �2�I
n` � ` � S'"� �rn��. �a/ , 4 �, �,-� C �:.�,_,
�
' C�I�a � « 36 � .:� '�� x �.�
���. 1-�� � I-.s � �, 2� ��;,.-� �z�.� � ; ,�.=
���
` v�.�r�-�� �� �- ;�1 S'�I 'L ��'� •-�.��' f'-� . �— �`
.Z.�
�... � � �► I 5� 13 �.Y''�l � a C'�-6- �,-, -�
� .�
, � �_
� m 1 � (�-iN n� � 1 K' � 2 /'_..,. .� _ A . n .�-^ � �,r . _ ,....
• �- ,• v l �4 •• �, �,• ,,,,r —,,,� lS/ u)1 �lQU lJ l
� ,��c v�,�� � ��-- •
L d �* /�
�.� �e c o�I�1 e �
�
I�__ A'� hIA'��yA-,�� �° ) Sdt� r'�,��R�Ao►�► c� �
� �a �.�
� f �-�
c C,.l:;�?.. L
Z � � `� /� pt� r o �� � � '", �-'
.
�r 3.s'� ,�r,�.b I► ,tZ.
� zt ��- '�� � � �����
��.��z/ �� �
� _
.
Attachment 4
� �` r �
Existing Coverage Map
s
� i J���� r� � � Z �
�� �� � n o `' ��`'�+�i�� �? ��l i` ��`'
��
��..c�li��'���^R��A�a ��i`l� ��'�rrr��r �,� -„"' �G.���u�"�' �I���"D�A�lt��BG�.�� � � �9 � � � l� �
— -. �
' • � - - ^ - _"'''"�' j. ��'" .- _ _ - _ ^ = s _
� � _ '- _ � � '':a.=� _ __ _ =t . _ =� _ � . . , ,
i : , ,:., '^` , .. i . ��' � _' �- - 'c '1J � � . _ ' . _ • F � r � l �•�'-Ci•. �" � • -, - -.
- _' � - i. :C.= ,�� - _ -- ' - -
�. .. 1?• . ���� � • . ' � n - � �F'= `L �Rr�i`. .. . �' j _ ^ ♦ ' � _ . __
� . ( ' `.�-• J ` _^ �� ' ,s'•-- �. � . � -_, Rlr1Sllf1 Lfl r — _ __ ��
' t -- i r'SL� /-i S�t'�R:r� Ln� ` j .rt `�`� r `• a � -- - = _ ' . -- y � --
�� _ . � 1i � � �� . .G'l.ms�L�t ��c- - _
, --- __ - - ?G� , �nT ti � r �'� �_ � � - - J ���'_ ..
. ; . `" -4 ,j G.Trd `_,���_1," ,•, _ -.
t i L= .<�a� 7 L'`�"-= - e . _.r : . - : � • . _
. .. �# _ M ` r� j aCr�A� �` [.r �,, �PJ�I' r '
. ' � �' _ Cf � _
j _ ;j _ ,� . � � . _ . � .. _ '
y � �y �� _' a o' c
, � � � �. t' � r3 �i� �? ~ . -' ' .
4 I ' t � ^ � ^'��-�_ �f! C. L;'�' n�J�' l-�� i L^ - _ _ . �
. � � i'� . . - - -
1i S _ "��:_. �� g•. �.. �_ r _ � _ . ' . "
�� } � : _�": -•
_ '? . ;� G � _ '�r. 1 = • _ •
f ..�. ` �� � _�a �:'10!i+��l _. - �_ ' _ . _ � ; _ , .-
N � � , . �_.rtr� R -' -_ y _ _ � _ _ -= � a"'' -
� �� G _� . s - ;a'1 .SN
� •= ' - � i _ _ � _¢� _" , _
� � i
� � r� ,' I -
� I - � ` . � �� �. I . , � . =i i ' _ _ ' _
� ^�., � � � _ _.
C`�_ S �, 0.: V . 2 $;;r� , _ � i - = r .. : �" _ - _. .
{ � - ����� . i -" 1 =� I . ��_� j _ _ - �, � . _ .
�� ' '� �a.. � z, I ;� - _
X; � ; ; - �c �� a� _
'� ' � . � � ! _ i �� •. r! _
.{ � � �� ' . . — : .Pt Ct � _ _ _ . . _ - — - _
� _ , -- - . - .. ' � - _
_ .y . � — - ', -
I ' , I v � r . _ ^ot` = _ -
t � .' ,� r � I � � � = — ' _' = r
:Y.. �` i OPi�� ' BIu�Hi115Cr �, � c�° c . ' '
� ' � f►,� �'. i �• � � � ?' � � �
�,, � ,, � �< � -- , . ,.r , . � _ - � . .
-2� � � �• �� �� C� r _ � 3.
� � ;' h l.e�end : �:-=` �; _ � _
��-�• �"�:� i �� . � - • ----
. � - ExisYing On Air �yr' -�"` J �y �rroyDln . " _
Sites � � �` � �_
' In Buildin -76 dBm � � I _ ' _: - �� ^ � I J � ' f ' . - , `
� g ( ) ,; , �
i y . ,; .� {n Car ( -84 dBm) C'� i � � � t L , . _ . . h - -
' � `� ��1' C� � � C ,�+ Cn` �� - =g �- � �
i. k f: , � � ;n'. �� . _ ' _
� � j � i a1 ...I �`� • -_ - _
� : , � On Street ( -91dBm) ; �,3� _ _ • � =1: -- - • _ ' ' - - : - '' � - -
� y�� - �� `u .,�(�� ,` :t ' _ `
�� Proposed Site � -- - = - -- : _
. � ; ,:.�, s,.: ,. . �� � �23� ' �^ - _ — - '� _
� `_ p �" " �` � - i j -
#;. I .�� `^ _ . _ ,; � 1 � n� � -F _ _
� � ���� ��� �� � � e ` ; , ,. d , .
� 9�n rr o t� f � v ., � �;'�, ❑
,,�� ,
` Proposed Coverage Map
° =' �� ,�
' � �������5����
��'�.�u�41�111��� �^ ' � t� ° • : 1n�.'' !�:;..._, ° Yi
��a�����a ��� �� �°�;. .. : ���fi��r ������� ��. c o � � � � � �
i _ L � - - - -„ � a � �- a - - ' ...��'� _ f . _ .:� t . � � _ C -
- - �'� ~ J .� .. _ �L � . �.�f��
�.�. - � n _- _ ' - ,� �� � L� _ � ���_ ... �� • . ` = .r __ �
^r � �: � �_ _ - y �' r _ 'r' ' ' �d':f}• _ -' •
� ..,� ` _ � i` . � r
���'�� ( Aw "i���S�� _ _ . _ �_ � ` 1,�;.'.. __ �. _.._ I _ _ __.� . � .
`_ _ `�r � ': ' ' > -� n r _ � _. _ •'s V,__�
�� � _ '" - _ - � -_ : _ ` :i�•sin ln � - . _
� � - ����'� �� �r,�Q. i � ^ �; . ' • • 3p __ _ _ _ _ • �---'• •-
-�, �
�4�- :L, •�- i �`f'�j•� � � r ..: �• .., ��13'I�� L72 �:z �' - .:�-'-�- -
; - _ � - ��,. � ti � � � a ,.,- - . _ . _ .
' • ~ ' � 3? l' _ : �r _ -
L ? :�d J .-_���� ', �� � _ ' '
_ �� � �� v.C, an' �.y ! � �_-
.1' ` �_ � _ '+�:
- . yC � �;�.
� ar Yt,2. .� v � .-.- : s `��,.i� = : _ , _ g !" •
� .: , - _ �i� =t� -- . _ _ - _ ^;:., - 1
`' - `' ``' c ` i�� _ _ - - .
"� �r �7� J � :.;, � _; :, � �.: �� Ln - - -
-.. ! " � M o �. � t � � ;._.�., = j � . ?, ' - - _ . _ - . -
,:� � .. � _ ' -
�� ' . � � . . t' ;' -ti _:`'3rii�l �. _ �- .,;< _ _ _ . .:
N � � ' :;'� ,�' _:� ,€�: .. �+� �' c " ; .-� _t = - =- . - ,i. _ _ _
I I j � = 1 �� r, ' -. a �� _e�� _ _ .c � .,.�% " . �_ -
� ' ' �'. '
GO � - �' ��-�_� - -- . � t �'� a; � ' ; _ ' � -
� , — - , _ ` _ . .: _ _ - _ _ _ ,
_�; -� �'� *, � • -:� i��S;;,. �-, � � - - -
- � � � �`'� 7 , � .- _ - _. '
. '' ' — r ' '_
� - � � 'i L � 1.'� i� . c �� � �e _ ` � - � - . .
} � 1 ��': 1 �i c � � '� � '• r�P� � - '
_ .. :j� i � . _ , ! � � � ' '" - ' 1
r
{ � l ' " - .1
� 4 - _ - - - � '' _ � " - _:
.' �pfTY' _ � _ �
. � 1 ' -
� . � � p Q V ^ ' _ = _ , .• �
IJ. � � " '
I . � �
` �= �
�fUe I�1��3 [�if _ '� �
�i�%Ra``a j�� � - -. Y:� �_ ` ti " � _ . ,. _ ��
Legend r ''� 1 � - . ' _ ' � • , � -_'�� ---- -
��� �.=• � �� :;rr O�:iCrt .
- Existing On Air Sites �, �o , ,;J'�. ,� _ ^ _ y
' :r'� �� � . I _� �s��al:,� � • '� .E . .
In Building (-76 d8m) � o I � L •: s . . . ` • ' �.: r : .
__. ._ � '�� ' °' ' tt _ __ _ _ •
A,� -P � -,aCr - �. • ..
In Car ( -S� dBmj � •(� i - � - . t� - � _ _ _ -
On Street � -91dBm) ti � �' ��:��� ` �� -- : °1: :: - _ . . - a _ _ ' - �
�- - i L ���t� . ,� ;: ' - - _ - - _ --
Proposed Site � �� � ' ' _. - _ � -
�(, _ ,�� I � • _ : • _ _ �� -
. f . � _ _ _ Cr � „ _ _
� I) = � � - -
1 .:� � d..9 � a� � � �� ►i � �,� —: T � � ,;
�� c� a a f I� ❑ � �i rs
.il, �
�
Attachment 5
T-Mobile West Corp. • Propo� ed Base Station (Site No. SF24189D)
11371 Bubb Road • Cupertino, Califorriia
Statement o� Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers
The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consult: ng Engineers, has been retained on behalf of T-Mobile
West Corp., a personal wireless telecommun.cations carrier, to evaluate the base station (Site No.
SF24189D) proposed to be located at 11371 Bubb Road in Cupertino, California, for compliance with
appropriate guidelines limiting human exposur: to radio frequency ("RF") electromagnetic fields.
Prevailing E,xposure Standards
The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Commtznications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its
actions for possible significant impact on the f:nvironment. A summary of the FCC's exposure limits
is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are intended to provide a
prudent margin of safety for all persons, regarc less of age, gender, size, or health. The most restrictive
FCC limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency er�ergy for several wireless services
are as follows:
Wireless Service Fre4uencv Band Occupational Limit Public Limit
Microwave (Point-to-Point) 5-80 MHz 5.00 mW/cm 1.00 mW/cm
BRS (Broadband Radio) 2 600 5.00 1.00
AWS (Advanced Wireless) 2 100 5.00 1.00
PCS (Personal Communication) 1 950 5.00 1.00
Cellular 870 2.90 . 0.58
SMR (Specialized Mobile Radio) 855 2.85 0.57
700 MHz 700 2.35 0.47
[most restrictive frequency range] 30-300 1.00 0.20
Power line frequencies (60 Hz) are well below the applicable range of these standards, and there is
considered to be no compounding effect f•om simultaneous exposure to power line and rad'io
frequency fields.
General Facility Requirements
Base stations typically consist of two distinct ��arts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or
"channels") that are connected to the traditio�tal wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that
send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units.
The transc;eivers are often located at ground le vel and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables.
A small antenna for reception of GPS signals is also required, mounted with a clear view of the sky.
Because of the short wavelength of the freq�iencies assigned by the FCC for wireless services, the
antennas require line-of-sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are installed at some
height above ground. The antennas are desig:ied to concentrate their energy toward the horizon, with
very little energy wasted toward the sky or t1 e ground. Along with the low power of such facilities,
this means that it is generally not possiblf; for exposure conditions to approach the maximum
gr,;�icci a Pxr�n lm� � _� � � ��-�—•--� �'TP�tt'�E7Y
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC. TM24189X596
co�s� i,r��c r•.Nr,inrrrs
s,au r•h.�ncisa� Page 1 of 3
i�-2�
T-Mobile West Corp. • Propo:.ed Base Station (Site No. SF24189D)
11371 Bubb Road • Cupertino, California
Computer Modeling Method
The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology
Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation
methodologies, reflecting the facts that a direc:tional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at
locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an
energy source decreases with the square of the distance froin it (the "inverse square law"). The
conservative nature of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous
field tests:
Site Description
Based upon information provided by T-Mobile, including construction drawings by Michael Wilk
Architecture, dated July 2, 2010, it is prop�sed to mount three RFS Model APXV18-206513-C
directional panel antennas on an existing 60%Z••foot utility pole sited in the public right-of-way located
near 11371 Bubb Road in Cupertino. The ar.tennas would be mounted with up to 2° downtilt at an
effective height of about 44'/2 feet above grour d and would be oriented toward 0°T, 120°T, arid 240°T,
to provide service in all directions. The maxi�num effective radiated power in any direction would be
360 watts, representing simultaneous operaticn at 180 watts each for AWS and for PCS. There are
reported no other wireless telecommunications base stations nearby. '
St�idy Results
For a person anywhere at ground, the maxinium RF exposure level due to the proposed T-Mobile
operation is calculated to be 0.0012 mW/cm which is 0.12% of the applicable public exposure limit.
The m�imum calculated level at the second-�loor elevation of any nearby residence' is 0.22% of the
public exposure limit. It should be noted tha� these results include several "worst-case" assumptions
and therefore are expected to overstate actual ��ower density levels from the proposed operation.
Recommended Mitigation Measures
Due to their mounting locations, the T-Mobile antennas would not be accessible to the general public,
and so no mitigation measures are necessary t� comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. =To
prevent occupational exposures in excess of �he FCC guidelines, no access within 2 feet directly in
front of the antennas themselves, such as migrt occur during maintenance work on the pole, should be
allowed while the base station is in operation, unless other measures can be demonstrated to ensure
that occupational protection requirements are rnet.
, based _ _ _ __ --
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
���s� i, r�nc L:NC;wr-.ei.�s TM24189X596
s.�N r•�:,wciscc� Page 2 of 3
�;-2�
T-Mobile West Corp. • Propo:�ed Base Station (Site No. SF24189D)
. 11371 Bubb Road • Cupertino, California
Posting explanatory warnuig signst at the ant�;nnas and/or on the pole below the antennas, such that
the signs would be readily visible from any ;ingle of approach to persons who might need to work
within that distance, would be sufficient to me�;t FCC-adopted guidelines.
C��nclusion
Based on the information and analysis above:, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the
operation of the base station proposed by T-r✓Iobile West Corp. at 11371 Bubb Road in Cupertino,
California, will comply with the prevailing st�.ndards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency
energy and, therefore, will not for this reasor� cause a significant impact on the environment. The
highest calculated level in publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow
for exposures of unlimited durati�n. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure
conditions taken at other operating base stati��ns. Posting of explanatory signs is recommended to
establish compliance with occupational exposure limitations.
Ai�thorship
The undersigned author of this statement is a qualified Professional Engineer, holding California
Registration No. E-18063, which expires on Jt;ne 30, 2011. This work has been carried out under his
direction, and all statements are true and correct of his own knowledge except, where noted, when data
has been supplied by others, which data he beli:ves to be correct.
Q ROFE� SIpN
h �����P� M A Ty F ye` ,�
� No. E-18063 � jat athur, P.E.
, w
� E 707/996-5200
July 28 , 2010 * *
`�A F �FCT 21�P� �a��'
qTF �F C A1.�F
� .
j' Warning signs should comply with OET-65 color s✓mbol, and content recommendations. Contact information
should be provided (e.g., a telephone number) to arrange for access to restricted areas. The selection of language(s)
is not an engineeriilg matter, and guidance from th: landlord local zoning or health authoritT�or�n
require . ignage may a so neec o comp y wi t e requirements o G095.
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
c�c��st,�i:i�inc i:t�c;ini�:i:iz5 TM24189X596
s,au r•wwcisrc� Page 3 of 3
L-Z2 .
. ,�,
FCC Radio Frea, uency Protection Guide
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom �.ct) the Federal Corninunications Commission ("FCC")
to adopt a nationwide human exposure standa� d to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have
a significant impact on the environment. The ;?CC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological
Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequf:ncy Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the
Congressionally chartered National Council c�n Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP").
Separate limits apply for occupational and put�lic exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally
five times more restrictive. The more recent standard, developed by the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers and approved as Americ:an National Standard ANSI/IEEE C95.1-2006, "Safety
Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to
300 GHz," i.ncludes similar liinits. These limi�:s apply for continuous exposures from all sources and
are intended to provide a prudent margin of s<<fety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or
health.
As shown in the table and chart below, separ�te limits apply for occupational and public exposure
conditions, with the latter lixnits (in italics and/��r dashed) up to five times more restrictive:
_ Fre uenc� Electromagnetic Fields (f is frequency of emission in MHzI
Applicable Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field
Range Field Strength Field Strength Power Density
�z) (V/m) ��m) (mW/cm
0.3 — 1.34 614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100
134— 3.0 614 823.8/�' 1.63 2.19/f 100 180/f
3.0 — 30 1842/ f 823.8/�' 4.89/ f 2.19/f 900/ f' 180/J
30 — 300 61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2
300 — 1,500 3.54'ff 1.59ff �f/106 �j/238 f/300 f/I500
1,500 — 100,000 137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0
1000 � Occupational Exposure
� 100 .� PCS
o •� � 10 �� FM Cell
3 p�
� A � 1 �♦ � �����
f �� �
0.1 /
Public Exposure
0.1 1 � 10 100 10 10 10
-- Fre quency (MHz) '
� Higher levels are allowed for short periods of tinie, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or
� thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher
levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not
exceed the limits. However, neither of these allcwances is incorporated in the conservative calculation
formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997) for
projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those formulas into a proprietary program that
calculates, at each locarion on an arbitrary rectar.gular grid, the total expected power density from any
number of individual radio sources. The ro ram allows for the description of hnilr�i„a� a�� �� _
� ta cura e pro�ec ions.
�~=' ea' �� HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
� 4 i.'u , i� �
� �� 'i CONSULTlNG INGINEERS FCC Guidelines
";,� �',, r•�,: �i� snrr r
Figure 1
�:-23
�
RFR.CALC C�ilculation Methodology
Assessment by Calculation of Cc�mpliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Ac:) tl� Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") to
adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a
significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC
(see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent
margin of safety for all persons, regardless of a�;e, gaider, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for
short periods of time, such that total expo:;ure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for
occupational or public settings, respectively do not exceed the limits.
Near Fieid.
Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip
(omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications base stations, as well as dish
(aperlure) antennas, typically used for microwa �e links. The antenna patterns are not fully formed in
the near field at these antennas, and the FCC ()ffice of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65
(August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones.
For a panel or whip antenna, power density S= 180 x 0 x P net mW 2
B ,rc x D x h'� �cm ,
O.lx16x xP
and for an aperture antenna, maximum power d�,nsity S _ � x h 2 nec �� mW/�2�
where 8BW = half-power beamwidth o�the antenna, in degrees, and
Pnet = net power input to the a�itenna, in watts,
D= distance from antenna, ir meters,
h= aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and
� = aperture efficiency (unitless, typically 0.5-0.8).
The factor of 0.1 in the numerators converts to ihe desired units of power density.
Far Field.
OET-65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source:
2.56x1.54x100xRFF xERP
power density S= in mW/cm
4xatxD ' '
where ERP = total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts,
RFF = relative field factor at the dir�;ction to the actual point of calculation, and
� D= distance from the center of ra diation to the point of calculation, in meters.
The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a
reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole
relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of ] 00 in the numerator converts to the desired units of
power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location
on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expe:ted power density from any number of individual
radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to
obtain more accurate projections.
r ` ���` HAMMETT & EDISON INC.
��' �-� � -
� � � � coNSUt.�u.rc �c�ms Methodology
�'�� snrrFanrrctsco Figure 2
2-24
Attachment 6
`� �� �'��'� HAMMETT & EDISON, INC WILLIAMF. HAMMETT, P.E.
M4�
DANE E. ERICKSEN, P.E.
���`��� ���. � CONSUL:TING ENGINEERS STANLEY SALEK, P.E.
'';�'� W��':�� BROADCAST & 1��IRELESS MAizxD. NEUMatvN, P.E.
ROBERT P. SMITH, JR.
Rp,)a,T MA�ucz, P.E.
FERNANDO DIZON
KENT A. SWISHER
IVETTA KHENOKH
ROBERT L. HAMMETT, P.E.
1920-2002
EDWARD EDISON P.E.
1920-2009
BY E-MAIL COLINJ@CUPERTINO.ORG
October 26, 2010
Mr. Colin Jung, AICP
Senior Planner
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014-3255
Re: Appeal of DIR-2010-28
Dear Mr. Jung:
This letter provides responses to the seve ral statements you summarized from the appeal of the
T-Mobile base station to be located at 11371 Bubb Road in Cupertino. Some of the statements
are compourid, and I have tried to address the individual points succinctly, drawing specific
information where appropriate from our -eport dated July 28, 2010. Please let me know if
further elaboration on any of the points ��ould be helpful.
No. l: Antenna with a maximum ERP �f 360 watts is not a microcell, but a high
power antenna.
Response: This is a matter of semantics — not a technical question. Generally, a base
station with an effective radiated power <<bove 1,000 watts would be a"macro" site and
one under 1,000 watts would be a"micrc�" site, but that descriptive term has no direct
bearing on its compliance with the FCC ;;uidelines limiting human exposure. That is,
whatever a base station is called, it has tc� comply with the same federal limits.
No. 2a: Federal safety standard cited b r applicant does not apply to this project
because of the hilly topography and dens� population. Cited standard is for an
average slow fading, flat propGgation environment.
Response: The FCC standard cited in c�ur report is NOT based on "an average slow-
fading, flat propagation environment," n��r on any other propagation assumption. The
standard sets a"Maximum Permissible F xposure" (MI'E) level, which applies wherever
people might be. Certainly, the exposure conditions from a radio source would be lower
if the energy has to pass over intervening terrain, but for the purposes of our study, we
assumed that the signal has a clear line-of-sight to every location where a person might
be: indoors, outdoors, or behind a hill.
Web: www.h-e.com • bhammett(�h-e.com
Delivery: 470 Third Street West • Sonoma, California 95476
Telephone: 707/996-5200 San Francisco • 214/559-5200 Dallas • 202/396-5200 D.C. • 707/996-5280 Fax
�:-25 �
Mr. Jung, page 2
October 26, 2010
No. 2b: Exposure to several hours of sz ch radio frequency energy (540m V/meter) can
cause harmful problems for children, especially those 6 years and under
(based on the radio health anaiytical model published in the 2004 World
Wireless Congress in San Fran�isco).
Response: There are innumerable studies of the effects of exposure to radio frequency
energy, presumably including the one m�;ntioned above that uses (based on its title)
analytical models. Such studies are con� idered by the standard-setting bodies in this
country and abroad when they establish ::afety standards, and studies that are published
in peer-reviewed journals and whose res�zlts have been replicated carry the most
scientific weight. In the judgment of those bodies, the current standard incorporates a
margin of safety for all persons, whether old or young, large or small, sick or infirm.
No. 3: Because of the hilly terrain to t�ie west conzbined with the multi-story homes,
the FCC safety limit cannot be met unless the antennas are over 100 feet away
for residents living within SOO�eet.
Response: Distance alone is not the determining factor for meeting the FCC limit, but
it is certainly an important factor, as the •adio frequency power falls off by the square of
the distance; this is "the inverse square l��w" from basic physics. Also from basic
physics is the formula for calculating po��er density, used by the FCC and by us, as
described in Figure 2 of our report (and ��ttached here, too). For the 360 watts proposed
by T-Mobile, the power density has alre�.dy �allen below the MPE level at a distance of
12 feet in front of the antennas — not 100 feet and certainly not 500 feet. At those
distances, even assuming that the antenn �s are oriented directly toward someone, the
levels are some 75 times and 1,900 time� below the federal MPE, respectively.
No. 4: Exposure must take into accou�it the power density and the length of exposure.
Exposure increases in a non-lir�ear manner with time. Hazards are greater for
adolescents, young children ba,5ies, seniors & pregnant women.
Response: Yes, exposure assessment niust take into account the power density, while
the length of exposure only applies if the power density levels EXCEED the MPE. That
is, exposures below the MPE are allowecl 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Exposures to
radio frequency energy above the MPE are allowed for short durations, provided that the
average over any 30-minute period is les� than the MPE. This is an important point
about radio frequency energy; it is NON••ionizing and so does not have a cumulative
effective over time.
No. S: RF energy will affect children c� parents passing by antennas on the way to
schools: Regnart Elementary, .'�ennedy Middle, & Monta Vista High.
Response: Since by the definition of tY.e standard there is no effect on children,
parents, or anyone else at exposure level;; below the standard, and since exposure levels
for a person anywhere at ground from th�; proposed operation will be at least 800 times
below the standard, then children and pa:•ents going to these schools will not be affected.
�:-26
Mr. Jung, page 3
October 26, 2010
No. 6: It is not lawful to install a persc nal wireless service facility on a low-height
pole in a residential area.
Response: It is not against the FCC standard to install a personal wireless service
facility at any location, including a low-l� eight pole in a residential area, provided that
facility does not cause RF exposure levels to exceed the federal NIPE. The T-Mobile
proposal does not cause RF exposure lev�ls to exceed the federal MPE
No 7: Based on our calculations takirg into account the hilly terrain on the west and
south sides of the project, the e: pected exposure will be hazardous.
Response: I have not reviewed any cal �ulations by others that were submitted in this
matter, but in light of the fact that the M]'E cannot be exceeded beyond 12 feet from the
antennas, which are to be installed some 44 feet above ground, there is no location, to
the west, south, or anywhere else, where the expected exposure will exceed the MPE,
which is established by the FCC to be fu �ly protective against hazard.
No. 8: The City should consider siting all wireless carrier facilities in the Cupertino
hills, to cover Bubb Road, Regr�art Road & Lindy Lane.
Response: I have not reviewed the siti�ig and coverage decisions that T-Mobile makes
internally. Our role is simply to assess tl►e proposal for compliance with the FCC
standard.
We appreciate the opportunity to be of s�;rvice and would welcome any questions on this
material. Please let me know if we may be of additional assistance.
Sincerely yours,
�
William F. Hammett
lc
Enclosure
cc: Ms. Dayna Aguirre (w/encl) - BY E- vIAIL DAGUIRRE@SUTROCONSULTING.COM
Mr. Ryan Crowley (w/encl) - BY E-r4AIL RCROWLEY@SUTROCONSULTING.COM
Mr. Mike Dipiero (w/encl) - BY E-MAIL MIKE.DIPIERO@T-MOBILE.COM
Mr. Tred Haglund (w/encl) - BY E-N:AIL TRED.HAGLiIND@CHARTER.NET
;?-27
� � �
- `�' r,�+° � - �r:� F `�',. � " "�. �a-#`�_ i; �,r� � ;�.,
�r :: "i'� � -�.ifi , �t
, � ,, ..p'- r ,�
, ��
f
i
. ';�� r �i;
' . �
r -•.-N- . � a �,
� . . ,� .
; � . : � r: �'
r . •:
r { _ � .c- i= �J'
��^ � �' ' ).�% ' r �
� - � z- .+1 �+.� �,T � �, ht, ' � '� c
` ti 4 ` r rt f�;S'. ; r ;.� �
t '� �*� tI' -�� • ,; ' � w �;
* � 4� � s �; �6 ,' 'e, � � . �
�,� ., a• a s" �•.. ���+L 1 1� 4s�'. t
+.� r �� Y � . �; � 1 . . i ..
"�"� �. �� J � S'
� �„ f .. ; ? . .
.F' .
F � � �}..^� �+� �:�'' w� ,, ��� �� '. s
�,� A ± ..��` f�..�"���,�"' �j : �� �!�'�' F �� `�.
.�
y� �.�; ,�„ i �_
. � Y � .� � - �� M „ �> *"t��� � .,• d �. '.� ��� ' �,�' � -Sx �� r `i:
..r `3�
'�� i . �i��� ` � � s x -> •:�'� � -•':
'� � � as' �• � x �,�r2` �t� . ro . s � .� 7f�.`•f7 �"3
'Q It.ry Z'k .� �.Y�, � �, + x rP , � i� ` e �i
� ?
�, I .f . � '��� -�} 1 y •��a`i j •� i
�. ,� ; �` • �.. , , / , � , �H �� . r i �"I � r ,�� � � ..,� ,.,�. ,
} l. � ♦ �1M1' 4. •�j. �I �; R 1 � i��
. G � r �'�'�,� ,. . :..'�.,,�['yj � ` h � , a � •:4 -
� ` • � �r { r � � , A' 1 i • 'T14 ' R s i a
r . . . i.��; ` . f .- . . � � �t � • � �f A r�: � �..�: �� �'' � {1::
. . . ,. , 11 � t r' ' r �^ �•, � � � ` i
: 1 y t N '" c
� �� t� .. ( Y y� - .t.? r��i t.Z - " . � 2.� ./ �«� � 3 t
'. � �.a�..� L I � � � t� w:.c. 7 ""T � •. �+ � a �: � , ,a . ��! ;
. .�y �'•� i '��,i�r'�k. i } ��,, � - i �" '` �,,,'.,� � � �1 � , � � 1.:�'�+a J � { � � . , k
� � R. ,'` � = � r.it' t � � 1 f . ��: � ^�1,�.
. t � , � _ ` 4
�� �'.: � � � �' �. ' � Q�� ! .���� i �•. ,�,�1
�� � � ��. . �, ��. � = y , .
� ,,, fs �r. � � ,'� : a � �� ' '+.
� y: .� � .�w�i .. �
� ` �� �..a„�
� ��' '- . ' . ' - —� " °4±-:.�
. Z � .� „ ��1 . � �.,,� _ ' _ — �
. . . . . .... . _... .. .. .. . . . . .......... _ .. . ...
r
��' ` ;1; �/, , i) `, �, C/'� ;.
;
4
. `
1 4 �•• •�. �''.
, ,, '"� .� ��
. r,-; •�.
• i ' . 4: � � �.
, �. ` y ' {t+ . , .. /, I .� 1-
" /.
..,.` L, • � ~� , 1 �� f }; . � ', �•/ i�
! . = � J •+ �', -. + L '�* . ' , � f
.. i ; � ��� . �.. '� _,' + ; ,4'` ..? f ,' .
" T i .d� � � .t '
'� +z 1 ' �. � , - :
r �-. •- g,,�� j� r �`n'� � .. � . � . � � t�� .. �
`,� ,
S,�G,�.,Y y '�""��j'��¢f�t�w ". 11 � j ' , � �..
,� � ,i* s 9 , ,r•� � f y � ; X • ... •. ..
; '.r 4 s .t. !. 1 .�.G< � . . j ,y _
� j ! �, s at;,� �. � : . t � � 4 ' F" ` . I � q :F . •� �;
'���� 'ia-•K'�e+'� : � j ; � .'��� F'k; 1 ' � j h7:� • � ��� �� ����
• . + +': "�'� .?�1 ''�' �=j ,�, �, h ti,��,
�, . 7j. 1 ., P ` a• �
� ' �+ �t( t �.� , . ' , . . . � .
+r: ,
' � i� M - �y � T;, '�"f ; • j ,� � '� � ��' y.
� � ,. .t• �, -. . � .y 1� Jtfn �' .�� r
� . r,. Y <: � { . � .�c �{ttry�;� 'Y'� .` {,���,;, i_. ..�� �� . •ti1 `a 1t� . j �� '� t
t ,' �. 3{ x! � .. ` �r.P 2 , ' � + r F �r' �j"��Y, � . .F; " . � � ;.
. . � _ � .. , * e . i y �i�. t..: �. � �•� •� :� � i,�:�
{' j . _:
�� y2," � � � ,F � �i�� � 5 .� .-� ,��i � q y a �.. $ � � t �F"'�� tJ' v 1�+ . . • �� i �� �,. �1 �' r ?� � • � �`. ii'
t � i 4 } r t' �}' �t/{ � � 'c 3":�� .{ 1t � �'!• ..�'•• �i .. �
j G �'��� �• � i., i �p" � ;�' 5 '"���14 4#`�,.s S. . '�' ,.���� �•+ y ' ! ��, ' � � • � + �� , -w 'a:
�� � ��"b j 'Yb y '�°� ts ��k.�.. �S� }� f-:i'�"e+�Q, .r�i +;�t� '�+ t �i. � _ : ���. � _ �� � �� 1 .. ,� ,� • - r':#
g;��_ f:f ` �/� � e. .• � • �
� �F� S�, � S ii� __ ..+i... - � j,'.. ��' ' w�.►' 1. � S
.�. , � , a � .. . . Z . .
f � * '`h 2 ��:.',A" ;�. ,
� � , `� r �� . , t � , �.� —
J. q . ��I � •' . i, 1 �`}
y.. � ' �` •+ �^Y,. • A • A�
., .;* , _ � . " - -
•°� i • I i� i I f 1 I I 1 I
.1:�
� . _z --
� � � i � � i � ' I
I.
• " i //�1/I I' • �
. � � � .
. � �
. . . . __ .. _ __ __..__ .
� .: .
� �;1� �
�
�-~� .;
Y �! k :
' � .
- v
.+� - ; :�,,�•
-.�'��= �.
� � , yt'' y� � y.
�
,S�' ti c. • ' +i, " � .� ...
s � 1� . r y{! ,1 � .R:lti � .•_ (� �'�' .► � 7�'�
•.� •• � * '1 ';•.�.tl,,~ { 1 :�`
T��� dh � F � � .
. ,' • .,� , y .�,� . . �-. i � _� �� � �' � v t • i
• i. • r"� �� ,� � �.� 3•, � .. E- T � ; i : :r�'�i � ., �J� , � ��, �'i ' Yn, i � f
��� ♦��• . ;� :•� 1La y!1 r iti� � ��'�+ �I� s ;l' J 1. t i n, � .,.:�1 � �r•Q�
'h, r '� - f �► �. � � � 1l' '- ....,.� .. ��.
ti � � � �t. � [ 'ti • .' • � � ' � i � Y �f` " ��� r
a �� : �y� � � ' � � � ••� � � .� � ` T' °',+ � ' ♦ ! }� �` - �� '+s� �' �^• 't�'i�. � � ��"'! C - 't"'�i_ r Y
�"'4� i • h . -a_ ' � I � 's . , : Lr _ L.` .`�l. � • � �;b ` � - i. A 'A �, : . :♦ f r � f�.f� � ! 7� ���.....
y J' . . • �, . • a.� r �..j: �^`' �`L� � �� � L�� '.�
�, . z� �, '. ;� �� •�� -•• �'� ' .t�, ` • ��e� .� ���� ���h� ' ?.• 4� �.- . ;� �y .! ��'��{�L ��, i�i,�,.1
� R Y t '. � � . -. •' C� � :. �-. ,". . . � . +Y � '� � �. � ' , � • � ��}+ ,t ,`� �ya��.!: � �L�. ri i S�ir� � .'� �,� " t . ��
•Y � r ''`�* � ' 'F :. . � • f s�i..•.�4
l . . F �: � �i �i, , tr ' a �:� ._�: ti .. r :) . ' �
�y �►�'� � 1: ! 3 ti �.. . �t 4 � ��
� . ' � � ' ' . ,� � �. w� � � ` i��� 1 � � � � .t�+ . � � � 1� � �► � �.�� `* ' � . �R���ii� � t2T ��..t�
� , ryt �� � . .. . . • � � s + � • 1. '� .+ �, ' t � i i �� ' y 1,► � ,w ,! 9 n � �.. t ;� ��
`+� y �K•i- .� �� .. �„ a�.,. Jtl iY� • '� j . e�
d3b'�. � •.,G ., i .1 . � ��� ( ,S C *��, �F :Si•�' },;,;,�-. � . : j e���' . �.� ���, t.+f
s _,�. . � � ��� , :: , 4' �� � . � � ',�= � , y'` ''i1.. 1 •!,;'r� � �� ' u. i , .�'.
� ♦ ��� ' . .+' . 1�� �1. ' .� ��' i� S ;�� � .; .� .� ' t• �� y 7 . 1"'�� �:�� 1 1� �
�� � �R i• �7� v��• ��"fT1�l} L �;�y '. +� Z � � � -� ? +rk� „�.
• ~ *a 1 ��� 1 x3w' , �'-YC�' �.',�. r � , , . .
� y ir• t . . ' . .� '�' ti � . ' . ' �.
�""' ' �!1�1 . ��,, �- ', . �3 '" . _ � = _ �"�.' :
�. . �
__ - , ' •. -'•� : t = y..
� `c. ..- ...�
r! i �. �I' �� � �_ ��
�.
�= ,
4'•
y , T .
~ 7 � '} � ` '
�. F • 'd ' �'�R .
.• ' �� r• .i
'' �. i� . S°'�� �,• _ �: ��`
� T ~ ► � �'' TA_��;�! � ♦
�� J • , ~ ��. �,�� � 4 � � Ia+ ^ ' yr
i . . . � ^ � �� �, ��. '•,•r �
4 4 �.•' 3 ` ��' . t �'; �� � ' �� f �
�`�r� .�� j •• �s�. , - r ���� - i� f.:`�Yi •"3.� .:� I
� ti , a ♦ . �
J.f �i' �Ti 4 ..l.t� �1 _ . •�• '• •i �:� '. , � " , •
.� • rM� r, . ��►'� r . � . • � �- A �� .[ ' t� � 7 , y: � �'
�.� � � )�� t! � ��� � � A� `��.tS � � _�'. i'� 1 ,'i � . �•: � �� � .: 1 �'� .� �.
` � r i}+� M � � d . , M �S �'�- - � . ., '� �_"�� �+'r�' .Y� -
� � �.' � T' • � L� � � . :+ S l�.y:�` r •7 t � r . .L�i 1�� ��.r��..,i..,, 4c t � }:
y . a y .,' .. . 'a • 'f. ���' , 1 � R :�. Z (� . ,j , I .' " � . :,.� .. `'� ..'�`. �,� � ,. y � f Z , ' j [ ' �
f • .r•. ' .�'-.W.�t �' �• . . { '� `t � 'y � ,^ ' �:;;, �''tti " "' ��,� - �1 * v`�r 4� �i
� .,, . . :i • .. �f _ t, �;- A_ r � a. ' , 'y � �. t � T. . ��1►•� _+�" �l�',t,.�.v��`�S.�f �� •y��' ?�T� : � M1^
' ',a ,3. � �l 3" :: g� i �t. » .s�' r t y :� t � y ••� 4��
. ' ;`: p. ' � f. � 1 i � . '+� !•. .♦ j��. 'Y �� 1 �t
_� , . . . ',r t . �.. ����. � ?,. � +y�', 'i �'v'�!' ;` � �,�i�" �� r � . � .. ��'a'�
8 -�'� �M' J 1) 1 ' �,. M �� `. : ��, r'�
. . 2 . . • . "� i 2� :IN t 1 . 1 .� � i
' , . . H. ,� :��' 'kY .',� .��' �:,,�i � '�'Y �•d t ' �.�� �G�i iti � � 7i � �c:�.�>< a
�� . . . . �.,�� . . �l.i ���4; �, �• , . ICri� ti ' � � ����� � ` ..{ � ,� �`ti7.7 1t�^� �' . �t
. . � . � . "'1 L
� ' '� t ; . -�,. . ' •� r a , � _ �- r , � �� _ � - :�';���
�, , � �-.
��j1�y ' '� , . . � w �,� ! ie. � . ���-%r__ . � {' � .' . ,.., • .. ryq!!i' . . r t J..
�'' ���.:�:: . !h"� 3��',�3 . ' ` e.� J `� �r i" . . .
. . � �� 4 �'.
� F'' ' ..""' - �: �
— ' _ �-�. f" '�. .,3.�ya�9.° ,...i�
� ��
� b . � , ! � � / � �• � f � 1 .� � / / I A / � . ! I /
'�' . • � � � ' _
�
� � • 1 � � ' / �
M
L • II�I/I I' • �
I
� � � � �
•
,
N
. �
W
0
view from Bubb Road looking northwest at site
, ���, o I ' ,�` ��� 1 � - �1 y `�;; , � SF24 7 89 PG&E Regnart
;�.� ��,� �-.°'���-�������) ` � T371 Bubb Road, Cupertrno, CA
� .
..
�,
�
�
.. - �
!' �
4 �
L .� � '_
-
.:�
. R_
i��
:?C
. �
� ji
c aa l; �
���'• _'"?
. � .�i- '
R . �• , r.
\ �J .�a •
PreposeA f�;ttobile
A�1r�nns
y
J Proposed
Equ/pmenr
�`r
� ~ 's: "'_� � �-
� �r�o�ose�
�t-. .
.
.. . �
�
.
Z, i
: 1„'�
: �
�fy��7�/
-ri��-:,�
.� f ,
�J F
ti
:c,r� �
... ..�l�i�
�
.
.' r �'��.��ti� i � • � �'� ��: �� "�-''i/*t
' � �"!�:'� �l h�1�F. ~,+�*� � !•S �f l ; + f , ��„" - • '� • ,t '.T+'�i �
� r _ ,� .�' ,�'„ .' . �( � �F' `�' � , ' .K . r ',!�'. + .,:e
1 . . � , ,,;N y�j'
�� ,`t "� � , . 4 A. . ,�yyr ,.i�''• .,: � °, 9 • t..�J ... � , � /�w;,.... _ ' • �� , �..:t
i J _ \ ,i _ t,� . �i t .. , . �, •, � q r �� � 1 . ;� . , �, . � , - '�.
�, . :,; � r .�� r � ' ' ' /�'� !,�'; •w �i ! � 1
J..'": \ �H�-. �' �l � � . d1 r.. � '` �j` . • „� ��`� �S, c5�,� . * �� 1�! �.
, yj « �
hu r �, ��'. x � �t �� . ��' "� r.. K� r � � � � . t r
+ ' x=�.•`, __ � war.r :. -'. ` }_ L . ~ �%y; ' •�L "�. ^ • �i _ _ . � . . "SAi'.;.:" 4 Y;,'r'a�t � .� .'� ti �} t y.' s '� � ' i�' Y . _ �.
,f,s. ' �.. .�' 1 � . 1. . �{�*�;� � . �.
,j� . � �ti. �i • �I i. .� � � . . � �.�-. . f / j 1 . ���. ^.Y '} :i .�'-� �.
��: . o} 5' r � .�j� °_ . .. ' ,9 ! �\:: ' �''` 'r y� ' f.i ' . '.� � ' M ';"` �. .''�— r•
r � , .:;� ;: A.l- �* �, •:' , , . �.,., ;, ! � , 3 ,� .
';: _.� � -v -e., ��...'t 'c �.r,c. �'"
- _ � � �� Jt,' -- �'" �'� �"i -
, � _ � .
ti
• .i
� i' i+
t"�e'.+ G
�
�
� 1 � 1 / 1
� 1 3 1
T-MOBI LE WEST CORP�RATION
■ ■
Y I t r
`:�
�,'., �
�� i�
,���
,k �
: ��,
: �., �:
a DELAWARE CORP�RATION
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR, CONCORD, CA 94520
USA North
CALL• 811
A7IFASC SWO DAYS
HEFOR£ YOU DIG
UNDERCROUND SERVI� ALERT OF
NORfHERN CALffORMA
Attachment 8
�>tf�-�.� -�.g
��� ��� � ��'� :���.��`���..
G��'� t �: . ' - 0
�t���,T�f ��: '
�o�- ��M�U Y V. C�t��
U
ON BU BB RD. BETWEEN FOLKSTON E DR. & CON RADIA CT.
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CODE COMPLIANCE PROJECT DESCRIPTION DRIVING DIRECTIONS
ALL WORK AND MATERWLS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN THIS IS AN UNMANNm 1ELECOMMUNICA710NS FACIUT`f FOR T-MOBILE rROM T-MOBILE OFFICE: CONCORD, CA
ACCORDANCE WRN THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS CONSISTING OF TNE INSTALJ.Al10N AND OPERATiON OF ANTENNAS dc ASSOCIATED
ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS EQUIPMENT ON A WOODEN POLF. 7. HEAD SOUTHWEST ON CUIYTON RD TOWARO EDIE CT/PINE ST - 0.2 MI
TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO PERMR WORK NOT CONFORMING TO T}iESE CODES. � ��� ���m��� r� �n� r. ' i uFpr� ON�TO CA- �42 S VIA TH �� RAMP TO OAKL4ND - 1.2 MI
1. CALJFORNW CODE OF REGULATIONS � 4. TAKE THE MISSION Bl W/STATE ROUTE 262 DfR TOWARD I-880 - 0.2 �11
2. 2007 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE 1. (N) T-MOBILE ANTENNAS MOUNTED WRH (N) H-MOUNT ON WEST SIDE OF 5. KEEP RtGHT AT THE FORK, FOLLOW SIGNS FOR MISSION BLVD AND MERGE ONTO
3. 2007 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (� 60'-9' HIGH WOOD POIE MISSION BIVD - 1.0 MI
4. 2007 CALJFORNW PLUMBING CODE ��3� p�Q ��� 6. TAKE THE RAMP ONTO I-880 S- 3.9 MI
5. 2007 CALlFORNUI EIECTRIC CODE � 7. TAKE THE EXIT ON THE LFFT OM'0 CA-237 W TOWARD MOUNTAIN VIEW - 9.3 MI
(1) GPS M(TENNA
6. ANY LOCAL BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS TO THE ABOVE 8. TAKE THE IXIT ONTO CA-85 S TOWARD CA-82 S/LOS GATOS/SAPffA CRUZ -
7. CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES 2. (N) ONE (3) 3308 BTS CABINET, ONE (1) ELECTRIC MEIER dc ASSOCIATED 4.5 MI
M15C. SUPPORT EQUIPMINT TO BE MOUNTED ON (E� W00� POLE. 9. TAKE THE STEVENS CREEK BLVD IXR - 0.2 MI
3. ALL (N) ANTENNAS, CABINEiS dc MISCELLANEOUS E�UIPMENT WILL BE 10. TURN RIGHT AT STEYENS CREEK BLVD - 410 FT
ADA REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN PaMID TO MATCH POLE t 1. TAKE THE 1ST LEFf ONTO BU88 RD - DESTINATION 4VILL BE ON THE RIGHT -
HABfTAl10N. HANDICAPPED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED IN
1.4 MI
ACCORDANCE WITH GWFORNUT ADMINISTRATNE STATE
CODE PART 2, TITLE 24, CHAPTER 11 B, SECTION
1103B.
PROJECT TEAM
ARCHITECT / ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK ARCHITECTURE
833 MARKET SiREET, SUITE 805
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103
CONTACT: FRANCES LESHER
PHONE (415) 839-9594
FAX: (415) 904-8388
EMAIL• flesher�wilkarch.com
SITE ACQUISITION:
SUTRO CONSUITiNG LLC
712 HEBARB ST
SAMA CRUZ, CA 95060
CONTACT: BWNE SWAFFORD
PHONE (831) 295-0868
EMAIL• bswaffordOsutroconsuiting.com
RF ENGINEER:
T-M081LE
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., SUffE 900
CONCORD, CA 94520
CONTACT: PRAKASH ZOl1NG
PHONE (469) 877-7957
APPLICANT/LESSEE:
T-t�OBILE
1855 GATEIiVAY BLVD., SUfTE 900
CONCORD, CA 94520
CONTACT: MIKE DIPIERO
PHONE (925) 260-9275
EMAII: mika.dipieroOt-mobile.com
it
ZONING MANAGER:
SUTRO CONSULTING LLC
4168 CLARINBRIDGE CIRCLE
DUBUN. CA 94568
CONTACT: DAYNA AGUIRRE
PHONE (925) 784-7888
FAX: (925) 551-0228
EMNL• daguirreOsutroeonsulting.com
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:
T-MOBILE
1855 GATEWAY BLVD.. SU(TE 900
CONCORD, CA 94520
CONTACT: TRED HAGLUND
PHONE (805) 264-2680
PROJECT INFORMATION
SfTE ADDRESS:
APN:
LATITUDE
LONGITUDE
ZONING:
JURISDICTION:
TELEPHONE
POWER:
Pow� nPPUCn�oN on�:
POWER APPLJCATION NUMBER:
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY
(IN FRONT OF� 356-23-046
3T 18' 10.84' (NAD 27)
122' 02' S7.B5' (NAD 27)
R 1-7.5
CITY OF CUPERTINO
ATdeT
PGdcE
POWER ORDER
VICINITY MAP
; _ ._�..��:» .-- . _- �� .-- � .
� �±a„3_ -- - - � 1 �
� , �, _ _��:. - -- . ` � ,__ F
--�, a �---� aa,u -
4 � Ti ° i i
�a ' �... �w�A_I �'� -.�,� 1 �! -
.� �i` �S
�,o�w. � - .m�a �; c. �� �q p , - 3
i -- -
�: v. � a; �. �r � - a
'2 p '0 C . . '. - i Q
� �s ' ° � :
4 ,m,�. . � ��� n.w.M , �a� - �
� h . . � �..wr . t -
.r � i;a�, u, - �r
-�• c 3 '-�
ep �.. ,► , 4�"� ' �
p ,,,,'"..
: � - g - _ °'+h''j c' ,
�, ITE g a ; .� -
� ~ YwariMi! liwlwW6 j ' � n ,
,� 1
- .9 �"
y� � -- drw.a� - Rwes..Or � _ . -- -� --- r.. p �h
€' �„-___- - _ _ ._ ' • , . �
�;:aa -,s�a_ -r-�!nti
� . k�.b+� O . �` � �. . " . I
- - �r . _ _�` � 3 � - - - . - '
� � . - c� -- :
... .�. � . .._ _. _ __- i iai.ao'_ �
- ;4, . .
.•--, :..-- - `
_ -. � �
CUPERTINO
��
,�
GENERAL CONTRACTOR NOTES
DO NOT SCAI.E DRAWING:
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL PLANS AND IXISTING DIMENSIONS ANO
CONDRIONS ON THE JOB SITE AND SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ARCHfTECT IN
WRf11NG OF ANY DISCREPANCIES BEFORE PROCEEDING WffH THE WORK OR BE
I RESPONSIBLE FOR SAME. I
SHEETINDEX
SHEET DESCRIPTION
T-1 TITLE SHEET
T-2 GENERAL NOTES
LS1 SURVEY
A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN / ENLARGED SITE PLAN
A-2 ELEVATIONS
A-3 CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
A� POWER & TELCO SOURCE / PARCEL MAP / AERIAL MAP
PS-1 PHOTO SIMULATIONS
REF-1 RF DATA SHEET / ANTENNA SPECIFICATIONS
REF-2 EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS
a ■ ■ ■�� �1 �
Mbe
T-MOBILE WEST CORPORAl10N,
a DELAWARE CORPORAl10N
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMATION:
SF24189D
PG&E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
SSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
EV.:�ATE: BY:
0 OS/21/10 909. ZONING DRAWINGS FL
1 07/22/10 lOa� ZONING �
DRAWINGS
� � 100x ZONING
2 09 03 10 DRAWINGS - REVISION �'
ROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE �
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 41 �839-9594
F: 41 �904-8388
www.wilkarch.com
�-CONSULTANT:
I
RAWN BY: CHK.: APV.:=
FL MWA MW
ICENSER:
�
SHEET TfTLE:
TITLE SHEET
SHEET NUMBER:
NOT USED
���"�p�p "'�-$
���'��-'����°� ������A��
�€���: ���
� � =� � r��''� � �: `
�'l��L�
�Y. ���*
- ' � GRAVEL
� WOOD CONTINUOUS
�� WOOD BLOCKING
SiEEL
ELEVA110N
ENCLOSURE
EQUAL
EQUIPMENT
EXPANSION
IXPOSED
EXTERIOR
FOUNDATION
FlNISH
FLOOR
Fl.ASHING
FACE OF CONC.
FACE OF FlNISH
FACE OF STUDS
FlBERGIASS
REINFORCED PANELS
FULL SIZE
FOOT OR FEET
FOOTING
GAUGE
GALVANIZm
GROUND
GRADE
GALVANIZED
SHEET METAL
GYPSUM
HOT DIPPED
GALVANIZED
HORIZONTAL
HEIGHT
INSIDE DIAMETER
INTERIOR
L1NE MONITOR UNIT
L1GHT
LOUVER
ucFrrwacHr
MAXIMUM
MACHINE BOLT
MECHANICAL
MEMBRANE
METAL
MANUFACTURER
MINIMUM
�IISCELLANEOUS
MOUNTED
MATERL4L
NEW
NOT IN CONTRACT
NOMINAL
�
�
O
�
`S
�
NOT USED I 6 I LEGEND -
!.
C
OUS.
GR.
r.
PROX.
CH
DG.
KG.
T.
'.S.
1.R.
M.
,P.
3.
<G.
2.
U
L
MP.
NC.
NT.
i.
L
�T.
r.
DWG.
(E)
EH.
E.B.
EJ.
EL..
ELAS.
ANCHOR BOLT
AIR-CONDRIONING
ACOUSTICAL
AGGREGATE
ALUMINUM
����
APPROXIMATE
ARCHITECTURAL
BOARD
BUILDING
BIOCKING,
BEAM
BOTTOM
BASE TRANCEIVER
SiATION
BUILT-UP ROOFlNG
CEMENT
C/�ST IRON
CAST-IN-PLACE
CEILJNG
CAULKING
CLEAR
CONCREiE
MIISONRY UNfT
COLUMN
COMPOSRION
CONCRETE
COMINUOUS
CENTER
DOUBLE
DEPARTMENT
DETAIL
DOUGtAS FlR
DIAME7ER
DL4GONAL
DIMENSION
DOWN
DAMPPROOFlNG
DOOR
DOWNSPOUT
DRY STANDPIPE
DETAII
DRAWING
DCISTING
EACH
D(PAN510N BOLT
DfPAN510N JOINT
ELEVATION
EL4SfOMERIC
5 � ABBREVIATIONS
ELEI/.
ENCL
EQ.
EQPT.
DCP.
IXPO.
IXT.
�N.
FlN.
F7_.
FIASH.
F.O.C.
F.O.F.
F.O.S.
FRP
F.S.
FT.
FTG.
Gy4.
GALV.
GND.
GR.
G.S.M.
crP.
HDG
HORIZ.
FiT.
I.D.
irrr.
LMU
LT.
LVR.
LW.
MAX.
M.B.
�IECH.
MEMB.
MET.
MFR.
MIN.
MISC.
MTD.
MTL
(N)
N.I.C.
NOM.
� GROUT OR PLASTER
� CONCREfE
,r
� ::.1_.:.:I ::._I :::� ':
:."I I "_ I l'.'� _._.��: .�j �� �H
....___._.:�_.------:-- PLYW000
N.T.S.
0/
O.C.
O.D.
OPNG.
PL
PLAS.
PLYWD.
P.T.
PTDF
RAD.
R.D.
Rff.
RE1NF.
REQ.
R.O.
SCHED.
SECT.
SFIT.
SHTG.
SIM.
5Q.
S.S.
S7'D.
5T1..
S7M.
TdeG
THK.
TMA
1�
T.W.
11'P.
U.N.O.
VERT.
VIF
W/
WD.
W/0
WP.
WT.
W.W.F
NOT TO SCALE
OVER
ON CENTER
OUT5IDE DL4METER
OPENING
PLATE
PLAS'TER
PLYWOOD
PRESSURE TREATED
PR6SURE TREATED
DOUGLAS FlR
RADIUS
ROOF DWUN
REFERENCE
REINFORCED
REQUIRED
ROUGH OPENING
SCHEDULE
SECTION
SHEET
SHEATHING
SIMILAR
SQUARE
STAINLESS STEEL
STANDARD
S'TEE1.
SYMMEfRiCAL
TONGUE dc GROOVE
THICK
TOWFR MOUNTED
AMPLIFlER
TUBE STEEL
TOP OF WALL
1'YPICAL
UNLESS NOTED
OTHERWISE
VERTIC�4L
VERIFY IN FlELD
WITH
WOOD
wmiour
WATERPROOF
WEIGHT
WELDED WIRE FABRIC
1. PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF BIDS, THE BIDDING CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE CELL SITE TO BECOME
FAMILIAR WfTH THE (E� CONDITIONS AND TO CONFlRM THAT THE WORK CAN BE ACCOMPL1SHm AS SHOWN ON THE
CONSTRUCTION DWGS. M!Y DISCREPANCY FOUND SHALL BE BROUGHi TO THE ATTIIJTION OF ARCHfTECT/ENGINEER.
PRIOR TO SU8MRl1NG THE &D dt STARTING CONSTRUCTION.
2. ALL AIATERL4LS FURNISHED de INSTALLED SFIALL BE IN SiRICT ACCORDANCE W/ ALL APPUCABLE CODES,
REGUU1T10NS dc ORDINANCES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ISSUE ALL APPROPRUTE NOTiCES & COMPLY W/ ALL UWS,
ORDINANCES, RULES, REGULATIONS dc IAWFUL ORDERS OF ANY PUBLJC AUTHORITY REGARDING THE PERFORMANCE OF
1}1E WORK.
3. ALL WORK CARRIED OUT SHALL COMPLY W/ ALL APPLICABLE MUNICIPAL dc UTILfTY COMPMfY SPECIFlCA710NS dc
LOGL JURISDICTIONAL CODES, ORDINANCES dc APPUCABLE CODE dc REGUUTIONS.
4. DWGS PROViDED HERE ARE NOT TO BE SCALED dc ARE INTENDED TO SHOW OUTLINE ONLY.
5. U.N.O., 1}iE WORK SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, APPURTENANCES de LABOR NECESSARY
TO COMPLETE ALL INSTALLA710NS AS INDICATED ON THE DWGS.
6. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSiALL ALL EQUIPMENT dc MATERWS IN ACCORDANCE W/ MANUFACIURER'S
RECOMMENDATIONS UNLESS SPECIFlCALLY STATED OTHERWISE
7. IF THE SPECIFlED EQUIPMENT CIWNOT BE INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THESE DWGS, 7HE CONTRACTOR SHALL
PROPOSE AN ALTERNATNE INSTALLATION FOR APPROVAL BY 7HE ARCHfTECT/ENGINEER.
8. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE ACTUAL ROUTiNG OF CONDUfT, POWER de Tl CABLES, GROUNDING CABLES de
COAX AS SHOWN ON THE POWER, GROUNDING dc TELCO PLAN DWG. CONTRACTOR SHAL1. UTiL1ZE (� TRAYS AND/OR
SHALL ADD (N) TR4YS AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFlRM THE ACTUAL ROUi1NG W/ THE CONSTRUCTION
MIWAGER.
9. TNE COKTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT D(ISTING IMPROVEMEMS, PAVEMENTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING AND STRUCTURES.
ANY DAMAGED PART SHALL BE REPAIRED AT CaNTRACTOR'S D(PENSE TO THE SATISFACTiON OF OWNER.
10. CONTRACTOR SHALI. LEGALI.Y dc PROPERLY DISPOSE OF ALL SCRAP MATERWS SUCH AS COAXIAL CABLES dc
OlHER REMS REMOVED FROM THE (E) FACILtTY. ANTENNl�S REMOVED SHALL BE RETURNED TO THE OWNER'S
DESIGNATED LOCATION.
11. CONTRACTOR SHALI_ LFAVE PREMISES IN CLF1W CONDRION.
12. /1LL CONCRETE REPAIR WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE W/ AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTfME (ACI) 301.
13. ANY NEW CONCRETE NEEDED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION SHALL HAVE 2500 P51 STRENGTH AT 28 DAYS. ALL
CONCREl1NG WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE W/ ACI 318 CODE REQUIREMENTS.
14. ALL STRUCTURAL STEEL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE W/ AISC SPECIFlCAl10NS.
15. THESE DWGS ARE FORMATTED TO BE FULL-SIZE AT 24' X 36.' CONTRACTOR SFUILL VERIFY ALL (E)
DIMENSIONS dc CONDfTiONS PRIOR TO COMMENCING MIY WORK. ALL DIMENSIONS OF (� CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON
THE DWGS MUST BE VERIFlED. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ARCHffECT OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ORDERING
MATERUU. OR PROCEEDING W/ CONSTRUCTION.
16. THE (� CELL S(TE IS IN FULL COMMERCIAL OPERATION. ANY CONSTRUCTION WORK HY CONTRACTOR SWV..L NOT
DISRUPT THE IXISTING NORMAL OPERATtON. ANY WORK ON (E) E�UIPMENT MUSf BE COORDINATED W/ COMRACTOR.
ALSO, WORK SHOULD BE SCHmULED FOR AN APPROPRIA7E MAINTENANCE WINDOW USUALLY IN LOW TR4FFlC PERIODS
AFTER MIDNIGFfT.
17. IF THE CELL SRE IS ACTiVE, ALL SJ�FE"�Y PRECAUTIONS MUST BE TAKEN WHEN WORKING AROUND HIGH LEVELS
OF ELECTROMAGNEl1C RADIATiON. EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SHUT-DOWN PRIOR TO PERFORMING ANY WORK THAT
COUID IXPOSE THE WORKERS TO DANGER. PERSONAL RF D(POSURE MONfTORS ARE ADVISED TO BE WORN TO
AIFRT OF ANY DANGEROUS IXPOSURE LEVELS. PROVIDE A PORTABLE FlRE DCTiNGUISHER W/ A RATiNG OF NOT lESS
T}ilW 2-A OR 2-A/10-BC WRHIN
10 7G LT�T TpA\TI fll[^r4\II+C T/1 •11 AI�Rf1I�\IC I� 11�nn�/
19. CONTR4CTOR SFWLL USE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES TO PREYED« STORM WA7ER POLLUTION DURING
CONSfRUCTION.
3 I GENERAL NOTES
SPOT ELEVATION
REVISION
GRID RffERENCE
DETAIL REFERENCE
ELEVATION REFERENCE
SECTION REFERENCE
1. THE COMRACTOR SHALL COPlTACT UT1Ll1'Y LOCATING SERVICES PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCiION.
2 ALL IXISTiNG HCTNE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC, AND OTHER UTILITIES WHERE ENCOUNTERED IN THE
WORK, SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL 11ME5, AND WHERE REOUIRED FOR THE PROPER IXECUTiON OF THE WORK,
5HAL1. BE RELOCATED AS DIRECTED BY CONTRACTOR. EXTREME CAUitON SHOULD BE USED BY THE COM'RACTOR
WHEN D(CAVAl1NG OR DRIWNG PIERS AROUND OR NFAR UTiLfT1ES. COM'RACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SAFETY
TRNNING FOR THE WORKING CREW. THIS WILL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LJMITED TO A) FALL PROTECTION B)
CONFlNED SPACE C) ELECTRICAL SAFETY D) TRENCNING dc D(CAVATION.
3. ALL SffE WORK SHALL BE AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND PROJECT SPECIFlCA710NS.
4. IF NECESSARY, RU881SH, STUMPS, DEBRIS, Si1CKS, Si0NE5 AND OIFIER REFUSE SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
THE SITE AND DISPOSED OF LEGALLY.
5. ALL IXISTING INACTIVE SEWER, WATER, GAS, ELECTRIC AND OTHER U11UilES. WHICH INTERFERE WITFI THE
D(ECUTION OF THE WORK, SHALL BE REMOVED AND`OR CAPPED, PLUGGm OR OTHERWISE DISCONTiNUED AT
POINTS WHICH WILL NOT IM'ERFERE WfTH THE DCECUTION OF THE WORK, SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF
CONTRACTOR, OWNER AND/OR LOCAL UT1lJT1ES.
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO IXISTING SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION.
7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE SfTE SIGNAGE IN ACCORDANCE WRH THE TECHNICAL SPECIFlCATION FOR SITE
SIGNAGE
8. THE SITE SfUU..L BE GRADm TO CAUSE SURFACE WATER TO FLOW AWAY FROM THE BT5 EQUIPMENT AND
TOWER AREAS.
9. NO FlLL OR EMBANKI�EM MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED ON FROZEN GROUND. FROZEN MATERUUS, SNOW OR
ICE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN ANY FlLL OR EMBANKMENT.
10. THE SUB GRADE SHAI1 BE COI�PACTm AND BROUGHT TO A SMOOTH UNIFORM GRADE PRIOR TO FlNISHm
SURFACE APPLICATION.
11. THE AREAS OF THE OWNERS PROPERTY DISTURBED BY THE WORK AND NOT COVERED BY THE TOWER.
EQUIPMENT OR DRNEWAY, SHALL BE GRADED TO A UNIFORM SLOPE. AND SfABIL1ZED TO PREVENT EROSION AS
SPECIFlED IN THE PRWECT SPECIFlCATIONS.
12. CON7RACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE DISTURBANCE TO IXISTING SfTE DURING CONSTRUCTION. EROSION CONTROL
MEASURES, IF REQUIRED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE LOCAL GUIDEUNES FOR
EROSION AND SmIMENT CONTROL
13. CONCRETE FlNISH TO BE BROOM FlNISH.
4 I SITE NOTES
1
s
e � A ■ ��J�11l.� �
T-MOBILE WEST CORPORAl10N,
a DELAWARE CORPORATION
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMATION:
SF24189D
PG�E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
SSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
EV.:�ATE:�ESCRI PTION: 8Y:
0 OS/21/10 907. ZONING DRAWINGS FZ
� � 100X ZONING
t o� 22 � o ortawiNCS Fl-
2 09/03/10 �OOR ZONING �
DR,4WINGS - REVISION
ROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE �
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 415-839-9594
F: 415-904-8388
www.wilkarch.com
NSUL'
�RAWN BY:-CHK.: APV.:=
FL MWA Mw
-LICENSER:
-SHEET TITLE:
GENERAL NOTES
-SHEET NUMBER:
�
■ a ■ o ��J�11� ■
o�.�ra...ari.,.rr-v.m.uu�
1t55 GATEWAY BLVD, 9IH F7.00R
CDNC08D, G 9/5I0
'ROJECT INFOR MAl10N:
SF-24189C
P.G.�-E. REGNART
NEAR 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPER11N0, CA 95014
;URRENT ISSUE DATE:
07/21/10
iSUED FOR:
REVIEW
tEV.:�ATE:�ESCRIPTION:�Y:=
1 05/06/10 155UED FOR REVIEW
�
a
�
a
�
n
rn
0
N
�
0
0
GH E/7 Ori �-- E/ WATER METER
— OH E/T OH E/T OH E/'f Oi� E/T -- C�H E� �
n c rr �, _� _ _ _�_ I TA
� .,., �i� vi, �� ,�� r_ i Vrt t/ � Cii� E�T
_ — — — t Of
_ ' _ _ _ _ T _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ��C�t� .. r-• — �
I � I
i �
I N .
I I
DRIVEWAY I I
I I
I (
GRAPHIC SCALE I �
�o a s �o m �o � (
I I
I �
( IIP FEIsT ) I
3 Jach � 30 ft I ir
I
I I
i
A.P.N. 356-23-045 A.P.N. 356-23-046 �
I I
I '
i
� (E) BUILDING (
I
I I
�
�
I
I +
\ I
. � I I
\ I I
' �
U
BOUNDARY SHOWN IS BASED ON RECORD INFORMATION AND FOUND MONUMENTATION.
THIS IS NOT A BOUNDARY SURVEY. PROPERTY L1NES SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE.
J/ 10 IU.OY �I'1/1U OJ�
122'03'01.71"(NAD 83)
JP W/ GUY WIRE
r(SEE DETAIL)
/ GROUND
WATER METER EL=396.7' AMSL
L1GHT STANDARD
—•JH E/7 r,H E/f Or, E/T pM — E/T r.y E/T Ch� -- c/T nH c�1 -- OH F/T � OM
N WATER M
0
'� �—TELCO PEDISTAL
— 01•f E/i -- Gr+ E/T 4ti — �L/T -- OH E/T OH E/� Orl E/T -- GH F�/T OH -- E/T OH
�
`nn DRIVEWAY -- -- -- — -- -- -- -- ---� `
�� 1 �
�POw AF £1�R04EFJVS \ �
A 4FRAC£ HE7G7/T I � \
EZ=�T39' A113 �
NT SS9 �a I �
\
�
A.P.N. 356-23-047
(E) BUILDING
A.P.N. 356-23-048
� �
-�-��� ��°�! s� � ��"�;��..�
� .a
��� i� � -
51.�*..�i4���"�..3��: ,
/� �jV�fVl�iiYt�
U
i:
�
. �
I
I
I
i
I
I
�
I
I
�
�
�
I
�
I
�
'ROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
I I
;ON SULTAN T:
�e woo �
Land Surveying Profeseionals
�IRIIY� M��G1�11s�OWMF7lPsOWM��O
IRAWN BY:�HK.: APV.:
ICENSER:
�p LAND S�P
vk. ` G , F K � H,9 �- <^ ` �O�
� f
*' No.7900
EXP.12/31/11
s� ���Q
�F CA���
HEET 11TLE:
S Uf7rG 1
HEET NUMBER:
LS1
(� FENCE �
i
—o
i
I
i
I
1 �
�
i
� i �� � ' o�-� *
������,� � �Y��it
f���: -/
���A����: �
� �� ttVf,UIY��
ENLARGED SITE PLAN
� -
E���•� �
f ' (N) T-MOBILE�
GPS ANTENNA
e
I
�
�G I
�, � x
i k
1 I a
7' � � m
�
/ I
I
2 =
�
W I
= m
>
� I
�
� o
_1 2
� I
x
�
xa
�
�'
I
I
�
D�V. [�i�.
�
_
I � a
� I ! \
m I : �
� ;
�� I Q j- FOLKESTONE DRIVE
c
� � � � CENTER UNE
i � I m � �- - - - — -- -
, i �
� m !
1 ---------��--
.; �' (E� PROPERTY L1NE --- -...------- - � ' i I
,- � �
G
� ' I f I i
i - I i uE �SiREET
(E) PROPERIY UNE
�...__.�..�..._ .
i I i, _ ." --�--- - -
� � � i •
�; � .
� �
_ �; i .
� 6�_ f v
� i
4'_6' f m m � 37'-8� f �
I R.O.W.
A.P.N. 356-23-045 i i �
11331 BUBB ROAD I i
O 6
i � 0.P.N. 362-11-063
i I � � 11350 BUBB ROAD
m m ��E� TELCO i
�PEDESTAL
� !
(ELPROPERiY LJNE !
--- - -- ---. .... __ _...._...--
_ _... _..._...._.. _ .- ----- - i IPOLEOINT �
I I ,.�� � � '
�'�;
� � (E) PROPERiY LJNE
, � i ; �� �.--
I .. _, _ _ _ __ ..___...._ .__ .�..---
I I �` I � _ _ -__
(� BUILDING = � �� � �
4�t ; I i � � -` � '
; t ��
m r \ 1
� � � I ('� � ,---,
' � � � � � ,
2 � J `,� � \
i - (E) �crRic - f� �
a a u '{SF-7R�AdR i � VAULT � �` `� I
I 11351 BUBB ROAD DRNEWAY ;� T(E) TELCO ! r = �'�,-, 1
a a � VAULT/(N)
I ?7 � i T-I�OBILE � :
� � P.O.C.
4y � � I I
" (� PROPERTY LINE •�� i I ( -
DRIVEyVAY
A.P.N. 362-11-061
iio4 ouoo Rw�u I
_ (E) PROPERT`f UNE
� I �� CURB —. --- ---•---�..._ ._... �,�
_ � � i
. —._ ._.... � I � l
. (� FENCE ' � � ;
m � �� 1$ � •`� ' , l �� ,� �{
� �. _ -
� \\ 1 _ I I � � I M � 1J �1
\ I i
p \ = r� . m I(E) WO00
= A.P.N. 356-23-047 � ' y P�O R E W/ GUY I
� 11371 8UB8 ROAD DRNEWAY ' � � I
I , �
��CTO,P I I = � M� TER i
m
� , �� �
i I � � I I� � DRNEWAY
i � � �
a C [_ y I
_
i � I ' � I _„I�
I I a
I � M � �� BUILDING 4'-6'f _ �; 5�-0'� �:�•_�� � , z��/�. ,,71�1���l�l!
� m
y
I
Z I W o
� � _ ;
Q I � I .....- --• ---. ._._....__ _ � (E) PROPERTY IJNE
� _..._....__ __ _ �.._...._
� " � m �`��
�
o I o
� � I (� IEI.CC
J 2 j = P��T/�.
� � � (E) WATEF
� � I MEfER
S m = m
w ~ .fi �
v I � I
I I
r (� A.P.N. 356-23-048
� I (E� DRNEI�VAY uv
11411 BU88 ROAD
a -
I
I
,,� • o ,. 4 . 2 OVERALL SITE PLAN
I I
I I I
rt rt. �n
I I �
� ,
I i I I
� i
� I 'I,
i �
t_ I
W ; � �
� m m m Q !
� I � � �
� m I
i. � a � l.
� � I �
, "� � I
I POLE
'
I
i u �STREET
� HIGH
� VOLTAGE
OVERHEAD
L1NES
� �
�....__. ��}�1
;
W
z
i�
�
a
° z
a
i�
W
, `�
i
AP.N. 362-11-062
11366 BUBB ROAD
(E) BUILDING
(E) BUILDING
--^ (E) PROPERT`f L1NE _! _ _
AP.N. 362-11-057
1194 BUBB ROAD
� �
s•=��-0• 0 4� g ,�
��I
����
■ ■ ■ ■� �1 �
o� �
T-MOBILE WEST CORPORATION,
a DELAWARE CORPORAl10N
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMATION:
S F24189 D
PG�E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
SSUED FOR:
� 100% ZONING DWGS-REV
EV.:�ATE:�ESCRIPTION: BY:=
0 05/21/10 909 ZONING DRAWINGS FL
1 07/22/10 �OOX ZONING �
DRAWINGS
� � 100X ZONING
2 09 03 10 DRAWINGS - REVISION �
�PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE �,*�
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 41 �839-9594
F: 415-904-8388
www.wilkarch.com _
=CONSULTANT:
=DRAWN BY: CHK.: APV.:
FL MWA MW
:SHEET TITLE•
OVERALL SITE PLAN/
ENLARGED SITE
PLAN
:SHEET NUMBER•
�
I I� L I 9'-0'f I � f� � ,; ,!
1-: 17't
/
W /
o�� /
a ^' � /
o � /
o �a
/
/
/
W Z 47 /
O N�
a �
° �w
� a /
s'—' a.
TOP OF (� HIGH
1101TAGE WIRES
BO'-9't AG.L
TOP OF (E� POLE
6
TOP OF (� HIGH
VOLTAGE WIRES
/ TOP OF (E) HIGH -
� VOLTAGE WIRES
55'-5't A.G.L
/ TOP OF (E� ARA1 e
/
/ 56 �-s-f ac.� � W
j BOTTOM OF (E) 3 p a
CROSS BRACE a n+ o
. �
o ��
45'-10't AG.L 'o a
TOP OF (N) GPS
PJ�TENP41
45'- '
� TOP OF (N) MlTENWIS
44'-3't AG.L,,�
�w► ww ca�
/
�
(� j� - �.o�o - �
����+��'�J�'� �����J�''A�.
-7-�0
��������?��: �`
�C�������4�TY �'���.
(E) POLE ELEVATION - NORTH
BOTTOM OF
TOP OF (� HIGH
VOLTAGE WIRES
TOP OF (E� ARM
BOTTOM OF
CROSS BR
j TOP OF (N) GPS -
ANl'ENNA
'-4'
� TOP OF (N) MlTENNAS
44'-3't AG.L..
nw�w� ww c�t
30� / r�/
° ^' o
�
° �w
70 � a �
. /
�
;,
i
'�
zs'—o't ac.� e
TOP OF (E� GUY WIRE
18'-10'f A.G.L
TOP OF (N) 3308
BT5 G181NEi
�o'-o't ac.�
BOTTOM OF N
ELECTRIC METER
0'-0'
E GRADE
,,� . 3 �(E) POLE ELEVATION - WEST
�rn��.�
= � 1 �... •
26'-0't AG.L
TOP OF (� GUY WIRE e
18'-10't A.G.L e
TOP OF (N) 3308
6i'S CABINET
10'-0'f AG.L
BOTTOM OF N)
ELECTRIC METER
0'-0'
E GRADE
�
GROUND
EL=396.7' AMSI
� 2 I EXISTING POLE ISOMETRIC
� 1
N TS.
. � . .�� il .
b�
T-M081LE WEST CORPORATION,
a DELAWARE CORPORAl10N
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMATION:
SF24189D
PG�E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
�! CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
SSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
REV.:�ATE:�ESCRIPTION: BY:=
0 05/21/10 907 ZONING DRAWINGS F1
� o�/z2/�o �OOX ZONING �
�RawiNCs
2 09/03/10 �OOX ZONING �
DRAWINGS - REVISION
r ROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE �
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T; 41 �839-9594
F: 41 �904-8388
www.wilkarch.com
U LTANT
� i
RAWN BY:—�HK.: APV.:
FL MWA MW
ELEVATIONS
HEET NUMBER:
�
�
� �
I j
. , I
� �
N i
; i
�
i
I I
I
�o�
ANTENNA DETAIL
NOTE:
ALL CABINEiS MOUNTm TO
UTILlTY POLE SHALL HAVE
A MINIMUM TOP dc BOITOM
CLF�IRANCE OF 8'
m
.
0
�
0
W
N) 2' TUBE
�
ELEVATION VIEW
MOUNTING DETAIL
�
Q o Q
M TOP
MANUFACTURER: ANDREW
MODEL #: APV18-206513—C
FREQUENCY RANGE 1710-1900 MHz
1900-2170 MHz
CONNECTORS: (2) 7-18 DIN FEMALE
cN, „�—,o x
6' ALUMINUM C
CHANN0.
-(N) 1/2'0 AIOUNTiNG
BOLT (CONTRACTOR TO
v�iFr w/ cneiNEr
Mr�. s�c)
•(N) UNISTRUT P1000
OR EQUAL. TYP.
(HORIZONTAL LENGTH
/lS REQUtRm PER
CABINEn
{N) UNISTRIlr P1047
OR ECUAL. 'U' SHAPE
FTTIING 1YP,
5/8'0 ANT1—SPLfr
cu.v�wtzm
TMRU—BO�r, rrP.
.
0
N
i
. ,��
9 .84•
ISOMETRIC
��
��
0
N
I1 �
FRONT
19.09'
�
�
�
TOP
ERICSSON 3308 CABINET
WEIGHT: APPROX. 87 LBS
,._�. 8 3308 BTS�CABINET ,._�'.`�.
1.Q SCnl�
'ffia pvpo;e uf tha �reaing ic ro rus+y fie amy�maa pmc�aai a e G['S�1)orm;i� enlmm
. �md aniveisl mou�sing ]dt •
2.0 Anl�uat CouIIg�ntiona:
AWeoa� cea6�vMlea TP p/n iiubtr �hAncr
GPSn.)M��+link�tr 3•1W6 1799.1i.OL�90
�. � .....,_.....,.._.,.�...:,..,....,..:_,..,.....w ~� �;�''••.,,,,
� � ����� � � ��� ��
_"`�€.....�•
3.0 Comp�mts and Ilardinare mpplicd:
3.1 SJRIVG�Jt� ittlOml hi1C�l.'} ID01mtIC3 F3� C�7RSICti OE �E Tll1C�091:IM pll(f Tllrfl%tt3 FI107.�
helov...a oomplcoo Ic: ybaa bu yroax.a pe. xu6a sbim« part nart,6t �iica m ya...
�.o.
� !Zs/ , ,1 i3- r�
� {� ,�f j�� f
j° I�� .z� i�..;; s.%�- i�`� �� �
� � �7--� ! � �z ,
i� �� ' � J (T�� �� G "I G ` '? ��
�-�! � '-
J . � � l. � _ j ��
. .. �� � � �. / " k �
f 'M / 4
,i�O� `,�� J �, / � + f �
s, ^ �� � ^.,�-�-�
t-LBrsckee 2-U nrackca
TP pct no. 1337$ TY pst co. 13527
� GPS ANTENNA DETAIL
(N) 6' ALUMINUM/
STEEL C CHANN0.
(N) 2' STEEL TUBE �
r�
(E� WOOD POLE
5/8'0 MITI—SPLJT
GALVANIZED
THRU—BOLT, 1YP.
(N) UNISTRUT P1000 OR �
EQUAI., TYP. (HORIZONTAL
LENGTH /�S REQUIRED PER
CABINET
� ~�
W
� a�
9. 1 I
a
N
SIDE
5 I NOT USED
�_6 NOT USED
N.TS.
NOTE:
(N) BRACKET ASSEMBLY
TO BE PROVIDm BY
UTIL1iY COMPANT
(N) 1/2�0 MOUNTING
BOLT PER CABINET
BOLTING PATTERN
(E� WOOD F
(N) MOUM'
�CAM—P—DI
'JUNIOR'
(N) T—M0811
PANEL MITE
PLAN VIEW
G M(TENNA
� ��— �oco — �.s
.`.��! +� d `��..J- � b� ` � ECJ 9�i'm
�� 9 �: '' ^ ID
b��i�E��+�,�! l�.
�..�
Q�'1�U Y ��. �i��
�
NOTE:
(N) BRACKET ASSEMBLY
TO BE PROVIDm 9Y
U711lTY COMPANT
3
@�
(N) MOUPlT
�CAM—P—DY
JUNIOR' OF
APPROVED E
(� w000 w
�. 7 PLAN VIEW OF BRACKET ASSEMBLY ,. 4 BRACKET ASSEMBLY
1
■ ■ ■ ■ • ■
l�I�blle
T—MOBILE WEST CORPORAl10N,
a DELAWARE CORPORATION
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMA710N:
SF24189D
PG&E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
SSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
EV.:=DATE:�ESCRIPl10N: BY:=
0 OS/21/10 90y ZONING DRAWINGS FL
� a��22�� � 100:t ZONING �
DR4WINGS
2 09/03/10 � OOSG ZONING �
DRAWINGS — REVISION
r PROJECT ARC HITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE �
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 41 �839-9594
F: 415-904-8388
www.wilkarch.com
�CONSULTANT: �
DRAWN BY: CHK.: APV.:
� FL MWA MW �
�LICENSER:
`- HEET TITLE•
CONSTRUCTION
DETAILS
r SHEET NUMBER:
- - �
�
�0
i'' I � I f
I 411�
OFFICfi OF C�Y�TT A7SC930N - SANTA CL�iA COYNTY, CALIfOqlll•
omc .�
35fi 23
. ���'� `'' �
�, � ''� �
� w
`e r� ,.t �� L� : „•.
s I3 i �
� , u � `�'u
(�� ,. �p�� '' v �'� .�r �
\2 � � �s �T „ t �Yo
'' � '..1 , . o
. o r ..a�..
�• ° ��. � Z( ` �t / .
. • �
•d• � ,. •
'r txyc"ia. �.i� Lo ��'4 i��. ..+ �s �
� �r `t - .'�' ':� I � ,/ - • • -i���. �
'� ... -• sy ` ' .. ? j:, r S -'
�' '"' ' ` :f !r' � • t T t F
` � _�.' ' � i. ' `�. $� �� � .s� :
0. ., $_ - F ,• �s � eA�',. .?� . e ..y �° ��.-_ �!
' �.2�'� 1+' '� a � �'.v �. � � . a -f �
, .'S�i r , _._ .• .. - ' . �
y 1 1 � ��s s 1
�-� r : �yb s , � ,� *. � :w+'�h!. �� ,: "� ,. Y g �' � , t
`q, �...� � : � � - Iq � $. t �� �'. ��
! � / � 1RR . .�••tik'"' ...J '
j �a', . • rss q r . i1QL4 .
�� i� r, ' � ."f �rF��
� � � �`i.,, ' ss� � em.� ,,.. �, C
�� i .*' a = rc:. '�4 � . , 2 '.� 'L4 Y . . _ .'� `_ °.= �7� ;;'• s. a
NP, . • ' i ,o , -- ''' � ` Tit f
�� G�E� ' �Z � � .` r 'n . L :°°w a ,.' L� � Y' .�L . , �
A , 0.5• .! .i g ¢ � �y L • ..w t � ^• sf _ - � � Y`-'�7.�_ '
�'/ r X �F r'�-2 •, G�M•T ' yS4mj• .'o;�� a�! � ZM �`. �
' � .. . �a� �ro%� : +"' � ��� A pLAYA + . :�. � 41 � �.� : YIQ . 2f1 i . i r i: � � 362
• ...��1_ �
� -' ,� �,v� :. .� � T � � ^ � �� � u • ZR •
! /i ~ ,r a l Y4 5 , �- +. j� ' ' �
,l�,f' rR�ap••, `"'" �.,c,s ,C 1! ap ' . � � .. d, - : � 3 : � , � m
f „ /� e �` � m � ^ �� � ,�� /� �.. � a4 � .� �' 7
f / � � 'r 11 y , �, s .,.. ' s . •� ,� m
.� ''p 'J 1}��a•� "p . a � ��" ` ' .� rq "°� • �,•J.T ;�* � '�^� � : r.r_ es 1ss
• � ye a .� n :y ; � , � t£ ,r vt 3aYe STA�r � / �•. ..ICs
J4 \`,,� s j`u—�t__ c�o ,� r• �. s---.�.
� ' � ' ` �
�
/ � I . � . L.H
z.asac. -.'':; \ � f a � Z ���: � `I �� 13 .. � �
� ,.0 .� �- � q � ?� j ��w s• � • � i � � . t� s:
--�..--- L � ¢- � � =� '.�`,� 'a' �' � � • s� � �:
�. _1`a ` r� i 4 � s�' �-+� �ss . ; -
� r . . �,r � t ---�...�__ . , ' ,..
~�' a - vrlcq•.�. :1 �s. ,' . r., � ._�� .
._ 4 � - M aiaa' --� RfA Cr 3 °.. 1! ,� � : �' "' , a;, i
� : ,,,,�, , � y �. _, � ,
� � : �•+
wt a r s , '�•� : . t: �� _i
u+a7�a : 7-rs�[ �- ��xi � �g � � 7 oi v ' ror� �� r
n.� �`�. : c � m `._--' ``�'°L R qNyBpyP , Tri ,p t ' . '• v.� % :'.:.. a F ' r ;:� :ce cbr.
mee+w�nsm�mo "' � _':'hs Y + +N•�t1_,it�
�VF -_ �26�
s ■ e ■�� �� ■
1 � �j
T—MOBILE WEST CORPORATION,
a DELAWARE CORPORATION
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMATION:
SF24189D
PG&E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
SSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
REV.: DATE:�ESCRIPTION: BY:
0 OS/21/10 90R ZONING DRAWINGS FL
1 07/22/10 �OOX ZONING �
DRAWINGS
2 09/03/10 10OR ZONING �
DRAWINGS — REVISION
r - ROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
VOLTAGE
SECONDARY
POWER SOURCE/
(N) T—�IOBILE
60'-9' HIGH
�D POLE
I PARCEL MAP
F �' �
PGdcE POLE
GP LOCA710N
_ . p `: 7 � i ������� "� f .�--si� .
i.
�� iA�� r . _ � 4 . � t �i � c:
. .
.�. �, ' � � . �.
, .
. _ . ,. ., ,
.. �
.
_
�.�
_ ,, , . v _
_. � . _ . :,. _ r,+�
.. � . . . , 1 3 ,4� ! X - � l � • '-i
„ ..
. ., , .
�, .. . ,
, � , , _ ,' �-`�5q� i:;
� � - s��
�.. �
, ` _ -�
� . } �,C'�r�c: ` .� ��'`; .
♦ t,�'*,
�� � � -
� - � � :. — '� d j! . ` j �
. t ' �� � , � ' r ', •
�j-�-a V �� � . .. . . . ,'. _ �JJ � ' � ii �ii si i�� i� � ' ' i � a' " � �
� 4i . : � _ + 1�•� � ' � � �� . _ t � . ..
, � ,, :� ��. ; "y •_ ' � ' a • .
Y . I ,.�-..,�----. i � e �' •:
«� __ A �...� "'�� ' •
�.. ^� + _� � ; 4 �...er1!C"..
� �.
- o . r ;Y �
�, .,: .-� ,r„?- ...-.+""r-=-
�� -•.,, �. S � � -' �.. � '�' � �; t �� �- �" .� _. sx �
���, .���_.. ,. ��. -� � . .. �� .�..:� . ��-,:�.�:.�-���.F;.. ._ . ��. _ u����-����;�
AERIAL MAP
. ' ."'�' °-�
ui a �� '`.■
-'�O[O —
��a�=. � : �
3 I POWER & TELCO SOURCE
� ''�1.�!U
�
L'�IIi�7�c�iCli� i'i7+wl��!'
�S 7r ' ■
�
�E�. Dtt�:
1
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE w
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 415-839-9594
F: 41 �904-8388
www,wilkarch.com
=CONSULTANT: �
=DRAWN BY:-�HK.: APV.:
FL MWA MW
�ICENSER:
SHEET TITLE: �
POWER � TELCO
SOURCE / PARCEL
MAP / AERIAL MAP
SHEET NUMBER:
�
PHOTO SIMULATION
Ad�anceS �
Fh�i�. S mu!�ti�n SoI�t�G�s
Corttact ( 9�5 ? �D'e•a507
���� ��
���R,��.��'� �`� � �a ����.
����: "
---- -- ----------- ������ ��-�.-- - �-- ---
� �� � ,�
��/. �� �.
1
�
. . . .��bil� �
T—MOBILE WEST CORPORAl10N,
a DELAWARE CORPORATION
1855 6ATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFO RMATION:
S F24189 D
PG&E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
ISSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
EV.: DATE:�ESCRIPTION: BY:=
0 05/21/10 90X ZONING DRAWINGS FL
1 07/22/10 �OOX ZONING �
DRAWINGS
2 09/03/10 �OOX ZONING �
DRAWINGS — REVISION
PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE �
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 41 �839-9594
F: 415-904-8388
www.wilkarch.com
LT
DRAWN BY: CHK.: APV.:=
FL MWA MW
_i irFNC�R•
_SHEE TITLL
PHOTO
s�MU�.�►T�oNs
:SHEET NUMBER:
■
OpUm(zer� Panel �uai Polarized Antenna � �
��� Optimizercq Pane! Qual Pola�zed Antenna
�
rou wma �oaau,9 aRa. m= In=1 a7� (i.a7)
Survlval tv�nd Speed, Im�lh (mph) 200 (225]
t4ozR+um Thn�st D Rued W�nd, X(wry t80 (ao.�,7
Fronc Thrusc � eacee wme, n(mq l80 (q0.�5)
sdropu�g we�gtn, kq �lu) 12 (26.I)
PacklnQ Dimc rtslans, MxVYxD, mm (In) 860 x 260 x 200 (33.8 x I0.2 : 7.8)
Paddng almcmion! - KsWxO m pe� aaa:.ZS :.zo tz.ai x a.as x or�
.. ��j f ��!► .
� ��r�
♦�����������►�
� b��;�����
�� ,, f��!
�� � -�'����
l �� r' �1��1.�
s��• .� .,�,���
■ ■ ■ o �V�l� �
�
T—MOBILE WEST CORPORATION,
a DELAWARE CORPORATION
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMATION:
SF24189D
PG�E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
ISSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
EV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY:
0 OS/21/10 90R ZONING DRAWINGS FL
1 07/22/10 �OOX ZONING �
o�u,wiNCs
2 09/03/10 140x ZONING �
DRAWINGS — REVISION
ROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE w
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 415-839-9594
F: 41 �904-8388
www,wllkarch.com
-0RAWN BY:--�HK.: APV.:=
FL MWA MW
RBS 3308
A WCDMA Radio Base Stadon
. ��
_ ,���
Yi ,� H.,
. , iYtr r [ � ..�.. �
7t� RBS 3308 s a�d�fe pa�N R�S
3470 OmiylFam Fik�n71! IliS 33� K a
mr� wCCaa ra�o bs moon poMag
mYCageandc�}artyEsaalaand i+�cr
C�I�CL
E:��csson� �
.,,;�,�-� ��
���. `-��='
� ,. �,� � s •.
� . _ ._.�...._ . :
Tlr RBS 9308 hanR016r appY� aYhat ho[
�SC deed �cR �a 6tie0 �trs ar� n0o�
oKr+¢ aa dnra da �vC�mdar�rw s�y�R
LYIi
ERICSSON 3308 CABINET
Kry tamo
. s�r � �a .,�n �+�w.. ,�om� n�
one psewti Tha pky-in urrib an he
dlstqwibd r�nddnq n a xegnt o} ZO kg far
nM erq4 naavfe� uiu (a+cfaxrel.
• AAambG itvginq on �rdb and Pda
. rremmf�.�w, �dY� wvo«+aa
• M�tw�u wrrfig�saYvrs with lLC�iveryry.
IlS('JTMA ard RET e suppwted.
. co-s�u�q �m csr.vwcoaanrrotiu a
��.
• OuSloa placarwrrt vnth neat axcnanger.
• Indoar plaCemant vrifh Glla unR In0 hul
a,�a+m+9a1•
• Hrdwrs rt+odul� hom RBS 3000 FYi
• SaRnras m+ectbns aM sofNwars up�
on be P�omKtl �rhls tha Fl&S is in
aipefa0an.
�
■ e s ■ ���1�1a� e
T—MOBILE WEST CORPORAl10N,
a DELAWARE CORPORAl10N
1855 GATEWAY BLVD., 9TH FLOOR
CONCORD, CA 94520
PROJECT INFORMATION:
SF24189D
PG&E REGNART
IN FRONT OF 11371 BUBB ROAD
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
09/03/10
SSUED FOR:
100% ZONING DWGS-REV
EV.:�ATE:�ESCRIPTION: BY:=
0 05/21/10 90x ZONING DRAWINGS FL
1 07/22/10 �OOR ZONING �
DRAWINGS
2 09/03/10 1009. ZONING �
DRAWINGS — REVISION
r -PROJECT ARCHITECT/ENGINEER:
MICHAEL WILK M
ARCHITECTURE �
833 Market Street, #805
San Francisco, CA 94103
T: 415-839-9594
F: 41 �904-8388
www.wilkarch.com
LT,
�
��� I�-�o�a "�-� �
����� �� �����
� J� �.�. ��.... �
F l il .e+ •
�
,�'°�-�-.�� e ► i [, J �r � ° ��
-1iry� ���•�E�6����1
NOT USED
��'�����. ----- - - —
' - MTSL/MTBPL Series
f�oo n... tuc.�2ao vo+e s�r�nws,w n�vo,.�nnryn �e.r�..w.-
�
S.n�k mnce �+nnwn
• L1+cnJ n� �eca�e +.m!rue rvr: r> ih v:n:.� .1`�.l i:t_. �Q
"- ..-:�! .:}!�-�'I,�:,;:-'_. .�'.•ntelhu�.iTrxm.!'�cJ
i�
• tiN'.]a::11�vt�11
�
• T�7c tK u�n.r+w:�a�
• i'o:nFimnm merce.�n�,n a:.�.i.nuc�-�.rt�a +.k<t u+rn ct�.+rv
�n�.ilinl ri•,r;h.,-,�,. 7nhn� ` Wm ,b�c��n:�[inC.�e�•ice arvLFk
a.:vcun M�{:ct rt IwiH�• �rulh„a 1'T'ti�x�-.ne mJu.loll
• � � ���d,�� :�.�,-,w ��
• I*.c1Fak �+.n•n�n �.� Iu�J .iJc hmcel.y.�.
• �•�.0 �R ualinC i�ni �tx� Jn�
iil�:ar rnr+�aum �i ��nK.,:L - l"'_1i�.lTBt �HU�
• RcnC�n•k
:JL �i� !� ,�ASI �_I: �
�� �
• :�N::� dl .7a .:r,i�. ehvn:�.�t :inw
� .,,�,,,�. _ a..-..;-.,.:^s,. �
�� • Cmnrrci �'+r lrt - i.u.�6,� ^tti I L�
• Wrl� �.iu I.�r �-..u�6y�u)i!
• .1U' lnd+
• �ace� �re .ulin¢ nnt - ur�l..t ::5016D
• 1ttT1 •�[ ��C:C �<lJll ��ri'fIJ'I�I KX�i[1 �I(1'�III`.11
� • N�clrr �il&� rlu< •:ii l�t -
faatw t�s l� -- &�o� l�
��IR 111'siUl 0..Y I v O fi �$1�1 :/A 1 M I�i�yM M09olW�"I.�f�l1� 1 1� ' F �
� �memt m•oa:� w nr w m a� Y� s w rrt•aaw �ouo4w�a +w t a a��
� qCtl� Ot'L197 d7 I 1!' ;'M .'�. � 9 q ! �f �441�:CM 'YwLfmSiW[��.1i�:4�rt �Y7 f Y .l �M �.
� O��l '�� 271 tnt :7� P1 `� ! M 1 � uYi�JM M/RtlAt /MFtt Rt i O IY I
�L L =L�
i �a�R � s�� �. a s � .a n. � n -:ac ose � �no�_ �• ���cr. .r,; �,� I a a � �r! �
Ytlf4{ 1�� �f �� t7 t! "i .. f�l�� M�'1y0•6SIi� MfO1N � 16. I
� 4t a s �r'
'.o'Or�ror.w�a:;.�...,3��:•���-;s�.xx•�.y . .._�_. _..-�— -- --'-- ---_._ _�.. .__.,
' A+i+Mr e �f.-� 6: r ✓.:'y.�r
-�-�
.. Fr �lf.'n• Ir' ,^,5' . �. ... aiC: a.an ::�� n'� .� .� : Nw :C
Mefr,vrmnoryr.a�.rm. Gv'aeia.!Suro�:m,rr _
----�--- �� ------�_ „c._�Src,r•9�-xxns•r�rzsscefuY�---------- - -- -
aa COQ� 8-li� � �u.,.�,�� ...i�.��- .;�n.,.. �. �... �......t� i...� .R,�,..... .. , ,: T .,.,�, air.i,�.�.... �.,,..i..,
4 I ELECTRIC METER
I dRpJiT BREAKER
CATALOG � ITE]M {t+
03�703
� � -- : Q
� �!� 7:= � �
�'
!_1
� � k"i
0 � I
�
� •--
w � �e a�. srm.
�
1a flPpl,Y flEYS/t ��14 t C7JOBCARD O.09NC M MtlYK UOif GRT
PLAIE 1A02 N50C Of IERJt.
��.�. uzi�rr�L
41 4J M Y
c+Kmw Pn�z7e t-r� c�oM
n�r �� c,vroeoum aoaiwa Puh. roovn
��
DRAWN BY: CHK.: APV.:=
� FL MWA I MW
�LICENSER:
EQUIPMENT
SPECIFICATIONS
�SHEET NUMBER:
�
����_
L,�1�.1'L� ` �O ;= �� p �J