The URL can be used to link to this page

03. CP-2006-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT REPORT FORM Application: CP-2006-03 (EA-2006-03) Applicant: City of Cupertino Property Location: Citywide Agenda Date: June 13, 2006 Application Summary: Review of the 5-Year Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2006-07 to 20010-11, for General Plan Consistency RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Commission: 1) recommend a negative declaration, file no. EA-2006-03, on the CIP, and 2) find the proposed 5-Year Capital Improvement Program (eIP), file no. CP-2006-03, consistent with the General Plan. Background: Each year the City Council adopts a five-year spending plan for capital improvements throughout the City. The CIP is critical because it prioritizes significant city expenditures on capital projects of importance to the City. Funding is not fixed or committed during the five year term. Typically, funding may shift in the second through fifth years as priorities change and project schedules accelerate or decelerate during the lifetime of the project. State law and the Cupertino Municipal Code (Section 2.32.070.C) recognize the role the Planning Commission plays in the CIP review. Discussion: Exhibit A is the draft CIP that will be presented to the City Council. lbis CIP focuses on funding repairs, renovations and relatively minor improvements or additions to existing City infrastructure: streets and public facilities. Environmental Review The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) reviewed the CIP at its meeting of June 7, 2006. Staff explained four important aspects of this environmental analysis: 1) Since the environmental analysis is conducted annually, only the first year- funded projects are analyzed. 2) Larger, more significant projects are not included in this environmental analysis and are expected to conduct their own separate environmental analysis as part of their ongoing project development. This is the case for the Stevens Creek Park Master Plan, and the Mary Avenue pedestrian and bicycle bridge that requires 3-/ 2 both state (CEQA) and federal (NEP A) envirorunental review because of the funding sources. 3) Envirorunental review is not performed for any projects where another agency is the lead agency for project development. nus is the case for the Bollinger bicycle lanes over Calabazas Creek bridge where the Santa Clara Valley Water District is the lead agency. The Initial Study attaclunent lists each first-year funded project and staff's envirorunental review notes. The ERC recommended a negative declaration on the CIP. General Plan Consistency Exhibit B lists the proposed capital projects and staff notes describing how the project relates to the General Plan. The General Plan consistency findings are summarized below: 1. Projects that improve the safety and functioning of the City's primary circulation system. See general plan policies 4-1,4-6 and 4-12 Projects in this category include: Pavement Management, Traffic Signal Upgrades, Yellow & Ped Head LED Traffic Signal Upgrade, Rancho Rinconada Street Study, Vehicle Count Stations, and VITS Extensions. 2. Transportation Projects that manage neighborhood tTaffic, decrease reliance on usage of private cars and promote pedestrian activity. See general plan policies 4- 2,4-3,4-7,4-13. Projects in this category include: Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Bollinger Bicycle Lanes over Calabazas Creek Bridge, Sidewalk Repairs, Neighborhood Traffic Calming Measures, Countdown Ped Heads, Safe Routes to School project for Garden Gate, SCB/SR85 crosswalk improvements, Collins Elem. School Zone Beacons & Lights and Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge. 3. Projects that provide distinctive community gateways at major entry points. See general plan policy 2-8. There is one project in this category-the City Monument Signs Replacement. 4. Projects that maintain the usability of the City's parks and recreation inventory. 'While much of the Parks section of the General Plan focuses on acquiring and developing new parkland, the plan also recognizes that a well-managed park system enhances the quality of life for its citizens. See general plan policy text pages 2-46, 2-51. .3~x 3 . Projects in this category include: Stevens Creek Corridor Park, Sports Center Tennis Court Lighting, Memorial Park Softball Field, Library Play Field, McOellan Ranch Facility Improvements, HV AC Replacement at Monta VIsta Park and StockImeir Property Improveme:nt. , 5. Projects that increase the inventory of parklands, particularly in neighborhoods that are deficient in parks. See general plan policies 2-74, 2-82 and 2-83 There is one project in this category -- Rancho Rinconada Park. ,.r 6. Projects that improve library service. See general plan policy 2-61. There is one project in this category-- Library Improvements and Upgrades. 7. Projects that reduce flood risks. See Flood Hazards General Plan text, starting page 6-25. . The projects in this category include: Gutter & Curb Repairs, Minor Storm Drainage Improvements, Monta Vista Storm Drainage System and Master Storm Drain Plan Update. 8. Other projects that are not addressed in the General Plan, but do not conflict with the text, policy or goals of the General Plan. There are no specific policies or general plan language that discusses the importance of maintaining existing public facilities and structures for public access and execution of general plan policies. Projects in the above category include: City Hall Emergency Generator/PG& E upgrade, Conununity Hall Improvements & Upgrades, Service Center Security Gate, and Community Hall Improvement. Enclosures: ERe Recommendation, Initial Study and attachment Model Resolution Exhibit A: Five Year Capital Improvement Program, FY 2006-07 to 20010-11 Exhibit B: Matrix of CIP projects and General Plan notes Prepared by: Colin Jung, Senior Planner Approved by: Steve Piasecki, Director of Community Developmen G:planning/pdreportJ pcCPreporlsJ CP-2006-03 3-3 CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE June 7, 2006 As provided by the Environmental Assessment Procedure, adopted by the City Council of the City of Cupertino on May 27, 1983, as amended, the following described project was reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee of the City of Cupertino on June 7,2006. PROTECT DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION Application No.: Applicant: Location: CP-2006-03 (EA-2006-14) Oty of Cupertino citywide DISCRETIONARY ACTION REQUEST General Plan conformance of the Five Year Capital Improvements Program, FY 2006-07 to 2010-11 FINDINGS OF THE ENVIRONMENT At REVIEW COMMI'ITEE The Environmental Review Committee recommends the granting of a Negative Declaration finding that the project is consistent with the General Plan and has no significant . nv' ntal impacts. . Steve . asecki Director of Community Development g/erc/REC EA-2006-14 .3 -Jf- '::\ . /;:,- ." ""."'1' j;;j\,' . ... j" ,I .~\ . 0j:)~,;:.3r . j'l'6,1 City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408) 777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department CUPEt{fINO PROJECT DESCRIPTION: EA File No. EA -2006-14 Case File No. CP-2006-03 ttachments Exhibit A . Project Title: City of Cupertino 5-vear Capital Improvement ProQram. FY 2006-07 to 2010-11 Project Location: Citywide Project Description: Various City capital Q(Qjects to repair. renovate. reRlace or .!:!Q9rade existinQ City facilities and structures Environmental Setting: Various urban settinQs that include_public parks. city streets and city buildinQs: city hall. library. community hall and service center. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Site Area (ae.) - N/A Building Coverage - N/A % Exist. Building -_s.1. Proposed Bldg. - s.f, Zone - BA. PR G.P. Designation - Public Facilities. Transoortation. Parks & Ooen Soace Assessor's Parcel No. - various If Residential, Units/Gross Acre - Total# Rental/OWn Bdrms Total s. f. Price Unit Type #1 Unit Type #2 Unit Type #3 Unit Type #4 Unit Type #5 Applicable Special Area Plans: (Check) o Manta Vista Design Guidelines o S. De Anza Conceptual o o N. De Anza Conceptual o S. Sara-Sunny Conceptual Stevens Crk Blvd. Conceptual o Stevens Creek Blvd. SW & Landscape If Non-Residential, Building Area - s.f. FAR - Max. Employees/Shift - Parking Required Parking Provided Project Site is Within Cupertino Urban Service Area - YES X NO 0 .3~5 A. CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SOURCES D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES (Continued) 1. Land Use Element 26. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District 2. Public Safety Element 27. County Parks and Recreation Department 3. Housing Element ~B. Cupertino Sanitary District 4. Transportation Element 29. Fremont Union High School District 5. Environmental Resources 30. Cupertino Union School District 6. Appendix A- Hillside Development 31. Pacific Gas and Electric 7. Land Use Map 32. Santa Clara County Fire Department B. Noise Element Amendment 33. County Sheriff 9. City Ridgeline Policy 34. CAL TRANS 10. Constraint Maps 35. County Transportation Agency 36. Santa Clara Valley Water District B. CUPERTINO SOURCE DOCUMENTS 11. Tree Preservation ordinance 778 E. OUTSIDE AGENCY DOCUMENTS 12. City Aerial Photography Maps 37. BAAQMD Survey of Contaminant 13. <<Cupertino Chronicle- (California History Excesses Center, 1976) 38. FEMA Flood Maps/SCVWD Flood Maps 14. Geological Report (site specific) 39. USDA, "Soils of Santa Clara County" 15. Parking Ordinance 1277 40. County Hazardous Waste Management 16. Zoning Map Plan 17. Zoning Code/Specific Plan Documents 41. County Heritage Resources Inventory 1 B. City Noise Ordinance 42. Santa Clara Valley Water District Fuel Leak Site C. CITY AGENCIES Site 43. CalEPA Hazardous Waste and 19. Community Development Dept. List Substances Site 20. Public Works Dept. 21. Parks & Recreation Department F. OTHER SOURCES 22. Cupertino Water Utility 44. Project Plan Set/Application Materials 45. Field Reconnaissance D. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 46. experience w/project of similar 23. County Planning Department scope/characteristics 24. Adjacent Cities' Planning Departments 47. ABAG Projection Series 25. County Departmental of Environmental Health A. Complete all information requested on the Initial Study Cover page. LEAVE BLANK SPACES ONLY WHEN A SPECIFIC ITEM IS NOT APPLICABLE. B. Consult the Initial Study Source List; use the materials listed therein to complete, the checklist information in Categories A through. O. C. You are encouraged to cite other relevant sources; if such sources are used, job in their title(s) in the "Source" column next to the question to which they relate. D. If you check any of the "YES" response to any questions, you must attach a sheet explaining the potential impact and suggest mitigation if needed. E. When explaining any yes response, label your answer clearly (Example "N - 3 Historican Please try to respond concisely, and place as many explanatory responses as possible on each oaoe. F. Upon completing the checklist, sign and date the Preparer's Affidavit. G. Please attach the following materials before submitting the Initial Study to the City. v'"Project Plan Set of Legislative Document v'"Location map with site clearly marked (when applicable) 3--h EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: >>- 0 C- - C Cc C; C -ftJl> ftJftJ 0<<1 ftJ"..... l> .! u .cu.c-'" .cuu ISSUES: -l;:;! 1-=.....'50 I-r;:" o ftJ C._ lI) .- i tb e- ll) - Q. zQ. [and Supporting Information Sources] G> C E lI) C .- lI)cE E o~- G>tb ~o G> tb_ ..J .- :e u .- - a.. en en C -'en - I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a 0 0 0 [RJ scenic vista? [5,9,24,41,44] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, 0 0 0 [RJ including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [5,9,11,24,34,41,44] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual 0 0 0 [BJ character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [1,17,19,44] d) Create a new source of substantial light or 0 0 0 [BJ glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views In the area? [1,16,44] II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES: In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique 0 0 0 [BJ Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [5.7,39] b) Conflict with existing zoning for 0 0 0 [BJ agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [5,7,23] c) Involve other changes in the existing 0 0 0 [RJ environment which. due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use? [5,7,39] 3~7 ~- 0 Cc -C Cc C; -~- ~ ~ 0 C'lI ~lU- ts .!! u u .c u .c'- ... .cUU ISSUES: -q::! 1-q::_1Go l-q::lU o C'lI C._ 0'-'j tnCl. 0'- Q. zQ. [and Supporting Information Sources] CP C E o C .-... o C E E - tn" Cl)tn :!::::!:O 0_ - ...I .- :E U CP .2>>- - a.t/) t/) c ...It/) - III. AIR QUALITY - Where available. the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: -- a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of 0 0 0 [RI the applicable air quality plan? [5,37,42,44J b) Violate any air quality standard or 0 0 0 l&l contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [5,37,42,44] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net 0 0 0 l&l increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [4.37,44] d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial 0 0 0 lEI pollutant concentrations? [4,37,44] e) Create objectionable odors affecting a 0 0 0 l&l substantial number of people? [4,37,44] IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either 0 0 0 1::&:1 directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any 0 0 0 l&l riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service? [5,10,27,44] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on 0 0 0 l:&:l federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal 3'-6 . >0,- 0 C'C -C C'C C;: -CUt) CUcu OCU CUCU_ t) .!! u ~u~.-... ~uu ISSUES: --3 ~=_1iio ~_cu o CU C._ 11)'-'- me. fI)'- Q. zQ. [and Supporting Information Sources] SCE fI) C ~._... II)cE E o~- Cl)m ~o CI)~- - ..I .- :E CJ !:Let) et) C ..let) - pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [20,36,44] d) Interfere substantially with the movement 0 0 0 IX! of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [5,10,12,21.26] e) Conflict with any local policies or 0 0 0 IX! ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [11,12,41] f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural 0 0 0 [8] Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? [5,10,26,27] V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 [8] the significance of a historical resource as defined in 915064.5? [5,13,41] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in 0 0 0 IX! the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to 915064.5? [5,13,41] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique 0 0 0 [8] paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [5,13,41] d) Disturb any human remains, including 0 0 0 [8] those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [1.5] I. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as 0 0 0 IX! delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued bv the 3-9 >,... 0 1:1: I: 1: c .- -I: nsns o1ii -ns't) nsns't) 't) .!! CJ .&: CJ .-... ~~ns ISSUES: -~a 1-r;:51iio o ns 1:._ II)'-'i C)Q. 0'- D. zD. [and Supporting Information Sources] .!IcE II) C .-... II)cE E o .g>>- G)C) ~o G) C)_ - ..J .- :E U .- Q.(/) (/) c ..J(/) - State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. [2,14,44J ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 IRJ [2.5,10,44] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including 0 0 0 IRJ liquefaction? [2,5,10,39,44] iv) Landslides? [2.5,10,39,44] 0 0 0 IRJ b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the 0 0 0 IRJ loss of topsoil? [2,5,10,44] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is 0 0 0 IRJ unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [2,5,10,39] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined 0 0 0 IRJ in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1997), creating substantial risks to life or property? [2,5,1 OJ e) Have soils incapable of adequately 0 0 0 IRJ supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? [6,9,36,39] VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or 0 0 0 IRJ the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [32,40,42,43,44] b) Create a significant hazard to the public or 0 0 0 IRJ the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [32,40,42,43,44J c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle 0 0 0 IRJ hazardous or acutely hazardous materials. substances, or waste within one-Quarter mile 3-lt >,- C _ 0 C- C C ;::; -C CIS CIS 0 CIS C -ClS- ClSns- 1:) .!! u u -'= fJ -'= .- lo. -'=ufJ ISSUES: -(i:~ ~r=_-;o ~(i:CIS ons c_ II) - .- en Q. 11)'- Q. zQ. [and Supporting Information Sources] SCE II) C := .- lo. II)cE E en :: 0 o .2>>- ~.- ::!iE u G)~- - 11.(1) (I) C ...J(I) - of an existing or proposed school? [2,29,30,40,44] d) Be located on a site which is included on a 0 0 0 [g] list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? [2,42,40,43] e) For a project located within an airport land 0 0 0 [g] use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private 0 0 0 [g] airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ ] g) Impair implementation of or physically 0 0 0 [g] interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [2,32.33.44] h) Expose people or structures to a 0 0 0 [g] significant risk of loss. injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?[1,2,44] VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or 0 0 0 [g] waste discharge requirements? [20,36,37] b) Substantially deplete groundwater 0 0 0 [g] supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [20,36,42] 3-1/ >0,- 0 c- -c C1: c:c; c -CIS- CIS <<I 0<<1 <<IftS'tS 'tS .! u u ,cU,c;:;1.. ,cu ISSUES: .. r;:: 8 1-l;::_caO I-r;::CIS o CIS c ._ tn'-'j O)Q. tn'- C. zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] SCE rn C .- I.. rncE E o.~- GJO) :=0 CD .2'- - ..J- :lEu Q.II) II) C ..JII) - c) Substantially alter the existing drainage 0 0 0 ~ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion of siltation on- or off-site? [14, 20,36} d) Substantially alter the existing drainage 0 0 0 ~ pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site [20,36,38] e) Create or contribute runoff water which 0 0 0 [8] would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [20,36,42] f) OthelWise substantially degrade water 0 0 0 [8] quality? [20.36,37] g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood 0 0 0 [RJ hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [2,38] h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area 0 0 0 ~ structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? [2,38] i) Expose people or structures to a significant 0 0 0 [RJ risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [2,36,38] j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or 0 0 0 [RJ mudflow? [2,36.38] IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established 0 0 0 [RJ community? [7,12,22,41] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, 0 0 0 [RJ policy, or regulation of an agency with .. ~ -I..!;( >>- 0 c1: -c c1: c;:; iijCU1$ CU CU 0 CI:S Cl:SCI:S1$ 1$ -u ,C U ,C .- "- 'cu ISSUES: -li:~ 1-l;:_1Uo I-q::Cl:I o cu C._ en'-'- O)Q. en'- Q. zQ. [and Supporting Information Sources] SCE en c ~.- "- en C E E o.~- Q) CD :!:: 0 Q) .2>>- - ..J- :lEu Q..en en c ..Jen - jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [1,7,8,16,17,18,44] - ~ ---- -- c) Conflict with any applicable habitat 0 0 0 [8] conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [1,5,6.9,26] X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 [8] mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [5,10] b) Result in the loss of availability of a 0 0 0 !XI locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [5.10] XI. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of, 0 0 0 [8] noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [8. 18.44J b) Exposure of persons to or generation of 0 0 0 [8] excessive groundborne vibration or ground borne noise levels? [8,18,44] c) A substantial permanent increase in 0 0 0 [8] ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18] d) A substantial temporary or periodic 0 0 0 IRI increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [8,18,44] e) For a project located within an airport land 0 0 0 IX! use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people reSiding or working in the ];-(j >>- 0 C!: -C C!: C;:; -nl"S nInI Onl nlnI"S "S .!! u .c u .c .- ... .cu ISSUES: -r= a ....r=~1i0 ....r=nI Onl c_ fI) .-' l:n e- fI)'- Q. zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] G) C E fl)c:=;:;o fl)cE E a l:n_ G) l:n .- G)~- - .- ...I .- :E Co) ~tn (I) C ...1(1) - project area to excessive noise levels? [8,18,44] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private 0 0 0 IRI airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [B,1B] XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an 0 0 0 IRI area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? [3,16,47,44] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing , 0 0 0 IRI housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] c) Displace substantial numbers of people, 0 0 0 IRI necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [3,16,44] XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to mail')tain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? [19,32,44] 0 0 0 IRI Police protection? [33,44] 0 0 0 IRI Schools? [29,30,44] 0 0 0 IRI Parks? [5,17,19,21,26,27,44J 0 0 0 IRI Other public facilities? [19,20,44J 0 0 0 1:&1 XIV. RECREATION -- a) Would the project increase the use of 0 0 0 IRI existing neighborhood and regional parks or 3~/tf ~- C- 0 C- -C C C;:; C -C\S- C\S C\S 0 C\S CIS CIS- ~ .!!! u u .c u .c .- ... .cuu ISSUES: -lj:~ 1-lj:_1iio I-lj:CIS o CIS C ._ II) - .- C) c. (1)'- c. zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] SCE II) C ~._... ",cE E o~- Q) C) :!:: 0 Q)~- - ...I .- :E u c.en en c ...Jen - other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [5,17.19,21,26,27.44] b) Does the project include recreational 0 0 0 lRl facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [5,44] XV. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC- Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is 0 0 0 lRl substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [4,20,35,44] b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, 0 0 0 lRl a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [4,20,44] c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, 0 0 0 lRl including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [4,?] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a 0 0 0 lRl design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [20,35,44] e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 IRI [2,19,32,33,44] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 lRl [17,44] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or 0 0 0 IRI programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [4,34] XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: 3-1.5 >0- 0 Cc -C Cc C:;:: I!B'tS CUcu om cucu'tS 'tS ,cu,c'-- ,cu ISSUES: - r;:: ~ f-r;::_1ao f-r;::cu o cu c_ 11)'-'- cnc. 11)'- c. zc. [and Supporting Information Sources] SCE II) C !:.-- II)cE E o tD_ Cl)tD ~o CI)~- - .- ...1- ::!!:u 11.U) U) C ..JU) - a) Exceed wastewater treatment 0 0 0 IX! requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [5.22.28,36,44] b) Require or result in the construction of 0 0 0 I:RI new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [36,22,28.36] c) Require or result in the construction of 0 0 IX! 0 new storm water drainage facilities or expanSion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [5,22,28,36.44] Installing new storm drainage facilities in an area that has none will disrupt traffic circulation and access to individual properties, including access by emergency vehicles. All work will take place in the public right of way, so there should be minimal impact to existing trees. Design and construction work will need to be carefully planned and phased to allow for emergency vehicle access. e) Result in a detennination by the 0 0 0 l&J wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? [5,22,28,36,44] f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient 0 0 0 l&J permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [1] g) Comply with federal. state, and local 0 0 0 l&J statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [1] 3-lfe a) Does the project have the potential to 0 0 0 [g] degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? [] b) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 [g] individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? 0 c) Does the project have environmental 0 0 0 [g] effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 0 I hereby certify that the information provided in this Initial Study is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief; I certify that J have used proper diligence in responding accurately to all questions herein, and have consulted appropriate source references when necessary to ensure full and complete disclosure of relevant environmental data. I hereby acknowledge than any substantial errors dated within this Initial Study may cause delay or discontinuance of related project review procedures, and hereby agree to hold harmless the City of Cupertino, its staff and authorized agents, from the consequences of such delay or discontinuance. Preparer's Signature Print Preparer's Name 3-/'1 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Aesthetics 0 Agriculture Resources 0 Air Quality 0 Biological Resources 0 Cultural Resources 0 Geology ISoils 0 Hazards & Hazardous 0 Hydrology I Water 0 Land Use I Planning Materials Quality 0 Mineral Resources 0 Noise 0 Population I Housing 0 Public Services 0 Recreation 0 Transportation/Traffic 00 Utilities / Service 0 Mandatory Findings of Systems Significance DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) finds that: [g] The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. o The proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impacf' or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. o Although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, induding revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the propose project, nothing further is required. Staff Evaluator 7{ , " 617/06 Date ERC 6f7/06 Date 3-/8 Exhibit A Environmental Assessment of File No. CP-2006-03 City of Cupertino First Year Programmed Projects 5- Year Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2006-07 to 2010-11 Stevens Creek Corridor Park Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbrid e Bollinger Bike Lanes over Calabazas Creek Brid e Memorial Park Softball Field Rancho Rinconada Park Library Play Field McClellan Ranch Facility Improvements City Hall Emergency GeneratorlPG&E Upgrade Sport Center Tennis Court Lighting Library Improvements & U ades Restoration of Stevens Creek btw. Stevens Creek Blvd. & McClellan Rd. Reduce picnicking from 4,000 to 800, instaU multiuse trail, reconstruct facilities Construction of a bicycle footbridge on Mary Ave. all nment over Hi hwa 280. City's contribution to widen bridge for bicycle lanes over Calabazas Creek. Renovation of existing softball field Acquisition of 8JW property for neighbor park purposes Renovation of existing play field, with irrigation & turf restoration Replace irrigation system for Comm. Gardens; Repaint and fumigate barn, bathrooms & water tower; rebuild or replace garden shed. Remove existing emergency generator and undersized transformer. Upgrade main electrical ane!. Design of tennis court lighting for night time use. Lighting upgrade to various interior areas in the library Separate environmental analysis is underway. ERC recommended a mitigated negative declaration for the TO' ect. 55 will be budgeted to conduct a separate environmental analysis when ro' ect is desi ed. SCVWD will be the lead agency for the project and environmental review. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Id: restoration of deteriorated facilities. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15316, Class 16: acquisition ofland for ark ses Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Id: restoration of deteriorated facilities. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301. Class Id: restoration of deteriorated facilities. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Id: restoration of deteriorated facilities. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class la: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class la: minor alteration of existin facilities 1 .3 -/1 Exhibit A Community Hall Improvements & U ades Monta Vista Park Building HV AC R lacement Service Center Security Gate Pavement Management Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repairs City Monument Signs Replacement Rancho Rinconada Street Study Dais shelving and storage installation, patio wall protective coatin Replace existing HV AC system on building. Install a more secure automatic gate at the Service Center Ongoing maintenance of street pavement, which may include pothole filling, slurry sealing and overla ent. Funds for the repair of curb, gutter and sidewalks when they meet repair criteria One on Foothill Blvd. to be moved to SCB at SR85. Replace one at SCB at Tantau Avenue Neighborhood street circulation study. Neighborhood Traffic Funds for roadway modifications Calming Measures to slow and redirect auto traffic Safe Routes to School Garden Gate & Signal Upgrade at Stelling Rd./Greenleaf Yellow & Ped Head LED Traffic Signal U ade Countdown Ped Heads SCB/SR85 on Ramp Crosswalk Imps. Install sidewalks where gaps exist on Stelling Road, Greenleaf Dr & on Ann Arbor Ave. to provide safe route to Garden Gate School. Traffic signal upgrade of County installed traffic signal. Re-Iamp all yellow & ped head indicators with LED in all traffic si also Re-Iamp existing ped traffic signals with LED countdown units throughout the City. Funds will com lete 20 intersections. Improve crosswalks at Stevens Creek Blvd. and SR85 Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class la: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Id: minor alteration of existing facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Id: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class lc: minor alteration of existing facilities which includes streets. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class lc: minor alteration of existing facilities which includes streets. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Ic: minor alteration of existing facilities Categorically Exempt: CEQA section 15306, Class 6: data collection Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Ic: minor alteration of existing facilities which includes streets. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class lc: minor alteration of existing facilities, which includes streets. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class lc: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Ic: minor alteration of existing facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Ic: minor alteration of existing facilities 2 3-.2 () Exhibit A Collins Elem School Zone Beacons & Lights Vehicle Count Stations SVITS Extensions Remove Traffic Sig. Flashing Red L T arrows Minor Storm Drain hnprovements Monta Vista Storm Drainage System Master Storm Drain Plan Update Stocklmeir Property Improvement Comm. Hall Improvement Install advance flashing beacons and flashing red lights m srop signs in the Collins School Zone. Install traffic count stations at De Anza & Lazaneo, and De Anza & Pros ect Rd. Install cable and boxes to connect City traffic facilities to Regional Intelli ent Trans ortation S stem Removal of flashing red left turn arrows at 4 traffic signals. Funding for emergency repairs as needed in various locations. Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Ie: minor alteration of existing facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class Ie: minor alteration of existing facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class lc: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class lc: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class lc: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15303. Class 3d: utility extensions ro service existing develo ment. Categorically Exempt: CEQA section 15306, Class 6: data collection Installation of new storm drainage system in Monta Vista area Lines to be installed on Orange Ave and B e Avenue Update 1993 plan by evaluating existing system and make recommendations, including fee u date. 2006-07 Pro' ects Listed as Unfunded Repair roof of former Stocklmeir Categorically Exempt. CEQA Residence section 15301, Class Ie: minor alteration of existin facilities Categorically Exempt. CEQA section 15301, Class I c: minor alteration of existing facilities Reception Room Automatic Door Upgrade 3 3 - :;l{ CP-2006-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO FINDING THE PROPOSED FIVE YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PR<:X;RAM, FISCAL YEARS 2006- 07 TO 20010-11 CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY OF CUPERTINO GENERAL PLAN SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: Applicant Location: CP-2006-03 (EA-2006-14) City of Cupertino Citywide SECTION ll: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received the proposed five-year capital improvement program, fiscal years 2006-07 to 20010-11, as described in Section I of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; NOW, 'IHEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:. That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the Planning Commission finds in accordance with CMC Section 2.32.070C, that application CP- 2006-03 is consistent with the City of Cupertino's General Plan. That the subcondusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application CP-2006-03 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of June 13. 2006, and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. PASSED AND ADOPfED this 13th day of June 2006, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYFS: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Steve Piasecki Director of Community Development Marty Miller, Chair Cupertino Planning Commission g:/planninglpdrepart/res,ICP-2006-03 res 3-:?~ Proposed FiveYear Capital Improvement Program Current Fund DescriDtion 2005-06 2006-07 2007 -08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 9100 Parks 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park 680,000 3,617,200 500,000 New Projects Memorial Park Softball Field Renovation 250,000 Rancho Rinconada Park Property 1,000,000 Library Field Renovation 100,000 McClellan Ranch Facility Improvements 45,000 Total 680,000 5,012,200 500,000 0 0 0 9200 Buildings 423-9222 Civic Center 45,000 420-9229 City Hall Emergency Power/Electrical System 40,000 370,000 570-9230 Sports Center Tennis Court Resurfacing (EFt 112,000 New Projects Sports Center Tennis Court Lighting 250,000 Library Improvements & Upgrades 120,000 Community Hall Improvements & Upgrades 45,000 Monta Vista Park Building Replace HVAC System 150,000 00 Service Center Security Gate 50,000 tv Total 197,000 735,000 0 250,000 0 0 * EF = Enterprise Fund 9400 Streets 270-9450 Pavement Management 1,512,900 1,250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 270-9450 Pavement Management - STP Portion 5"29,000 369,000 270~9451 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Repairs 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 New Projects City Monument Signs Replacement (2) 50,000 Rancho Rinconada Street Study 100,000 Total 2,541,900 1,900,000 1,619,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 9700 Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 270-9443 Bollinger Bike Lanes/Calabazas Cr. Bridge(SCVWD) 10,000 156,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge 1,472,000 7,241,000 428-9449 Mary Ave. Bicycle Footbridge-Mary/Meteor Entry Impr. 250,000 270-9447 Mary Avenue Crosswalk/Parking 107,000 Total 1,589,000 7,647,000 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ """ Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program Current Fund Description 2005-06 2006-07 2007 -08 2008-09 2009-10. 2010-11 9500 Traffic Facilities 270-9435 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Measures 5.000 50,000 420-9544 Safe Routes to School-Cupertino High 239,000 420~9549 Safe Routes to School-Garden Gate & Signal Upgrade at 475,000 Stelling/Greenleaf 420-9547 Yellow and Ped Head LED and Traffic Signal Battery 20,000 40,000 Backup System 420-9547 Countdown Ped Heads 50,000 420-9548 Street Safety Education Program 2,500 420-9551 Lawrence Expwy.fMitty Xing (Cupertino Share) 75,000 New Projects Stevens Cr. Blvd.lSR85 on Ramp x Walk Improv. (HES) 75,000 Collins Elem. Sch. Zone Beacons & Lights (OTS) 44,100 Count Sta.(DeAnzalLazaneo & DeAnzalProspect) 50,000 SVITS Extensions (FO Cable & Boxes) 35,000 Remove Traffic Sig. Flashing Red L T Arrows(4 Locations) 60,000 Total 266,500 879,100 0 0 0 75,000 00 \,;.J 9600 Storm Drainage 210.9612 Minor Storm Drain Improvements 47,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 215-9620 Manta Vista Storm Drainage Syst. 10,000 874.000 Master Storm Drain Plan Update 30,000 Total 57,000 979,000 75.000 75,000 75.000 75,000 Total Capital Improvement Program 5.331.400 17,152,300 2,194,000 1,575,000 1,325,000 1,400,000 Total Outside Revenue Share 3,128,000 13,071,300 902,000 75,000 75.000 75,000 Net City General Fund Funding 2,203,400 4.081.000 1,292.000 1.500,000 1,250,000 1.325,000 ~ ~ l.h REVENUE Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program Current Fund Description Funding Source 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 9100 Parks 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park Urban Park Act, Land&Water Conservation, 3,117,200 Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris, SCVWD FACHE Settlement, Dept. of Water Resources, SCVWD Collaborative 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park (EF)* Recreation/Blackberry F ann 680,000 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park Sale of City Owned Property/General Fund 500,000 500,000 New Project 420-91 xx Rancho Rinconada Park Property Sale of City Owned Property 1,000,000 Total 680,000 4,617,200 500,000 0 0 0 9200 Buildings 570-9230 Sports Center Tennis Court Resurfacing (EF)* Sports Center Revenue Account 112,000 Total 112,000 0 0 0 0 0 9400 Streets 270-9450 Pavement Management Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transp 468,000 327,000 Equity Act, A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) 270-94xx City Monument Signs Replacement (2) Developer and Insurance Settlement 50,000 270-94xx Rancho Rinconada Street Study (VTA Local Streets & County Roads) 100,000 Total 468,000 150,000 327,000 0 0 0 9500 Traffic Facilities 420-9544 Safe Routes to School-Cupertino High SR2S 239,000 420-9549 Safe Routes to School-Garden Gate & Signal SR2S 472,500 Upgrade at Stelllng/Greenleaf New Projects 420-95xx SCB/SR85 on Ramp x walk Improvements (Hazard Elimination Safety pgm - Hes Caltrans) 67,500 420-95xx Collins ES Zone Beacons & Light (State Office ofT raffic Safety -OrS) 44,100 Total 239,000 584,100 0 0 0 0 9700 Pedestrian/Bicycle FacilitieS 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge VTA Measure BfTFCNTDA 872,000 5,928,000 428.9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge State General Fund (Sher) 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge . City of SUnnyvale (General Fund & IDA) 110,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Caltrans 304/BT A - 2003/2004 600,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge TDA (Non BEP)2004-05:$65k;2005-06:$38k 103,000 . 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Caltrans 304/BT A - 2005/2006 300,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Caltrans 304/BT A 2006/2007 300,000 270-9447 Mary Avenue Crosswalk/Parking Clean Air Grant 100,000 ~ Total 1,572,000 6,741,000 0 0 0 0 ~ 9600 Storm Drainage Storm Drain Fund & SCVWD 57,000 979,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 ~ 00 -+>- TOTAL OUTSIDE REVENUE SHARE 3,128,000 13,071,300 902,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 New and Carryover Budget Version Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program Current Carryover New Fund Description 2005-06 2006-07 2006~07 2007-08 2008-09 2009~10 201 0~11 9100 Parks 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park 680,000 3,117,200 500,000 500,000 New Projects 420.91 xx Memorial Park Softball Field Renovation 250,000 420~91 xx Rancho Rinconada Park Property 1,000,000 420-91 xx Library Field Renovation 100,000 420-91 xx McClellan Ranch Facility Improvements 45,000 Total 680,000 3,117 ,200 1,895,000 500,000 0 0 0 9200 BUildings 423-9222 Civic Center 45,000 420-9229 City Hall Emergency Power/Electrical System 40,000 270,000 100,000 570-9230 Sports Center Tennis Court Resurfacing (EF)* 112,000 New Projects 420-92xx Sports Center Tennis Court Lighting 250,000 420-92xx Library Improvements & Upgrades 120,000 420-92xx Community Hall Improvements & Upgrades 45,000 420-92xx Monta Vista Park Building Replace HVAC System 150,000 ::.0 420-92xx Service Center Security Gate 50,000 VI Total 197,000 270,000 465,000 0 250,000 0 0 * EF = Enterprise Fund 9400 Streets . 270~9450 Pavement Management 1,512,900 500,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 270-9450 Pavement Management - STP Portion 529,000 . 369,000 270-9451 Curb, Gutter and Sidewalk Repairs 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 New Projects 270-94xx City Monument Signs Replacement (2) 50,000 270-94xx Rancho Rinconada Street Study 100,000 Total 2,541,900 500,000 1,400,000 1,619,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 9700 Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 270-9443 Bollinger Bike Lanes/Calabazas Cr. Bridge(SCVWD) 10,000 156,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle.Footbridge 1,472,000 7,103,000 138,000 428-9449 Mary Ave. Bicycle Footbridge-Mary/Meteor Entry Impr. 250,000 270-9447 Mary Avenue Crosswalk/Parking 107,000 Total. 1,589,000 7,259,000 388,000 0 0 0 0 <..,\J \ ~ ~ New and Carryover Budget Version Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program Current Carryover New Fund Description 2005~06 2006-07 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 9500 Traffic Facilities 270-9435 Neighborhood Traffic Calming Measures 5,000 50,000 420-9544 Safe Routes to School-Cupertino High 239,000 420-9549 Safe Routes to School-Garden Gate & Signal Upgrade 475,000 at Stelling/Greenleaf 420-9547 Yellow and Ped Head LED and Traffic Signal Battery 20,000 40,000 Backup System 420-9547 Countdown Ped Heads 50,000 420-9548 Street Safety Education Program 2,500 420-9551 Lawrence Expwy.lMitty Xing (Cupertino Share) 75,000 (75,000) 75,000 New Projects 420-95xx Stevens Cr. Blvd.lSR85 on Ramp x Walk Improv. (HES) 75,000 420-95xx Collins Elem. Sch. Zone Beacons & Lights (OTS) 44,100 420-95xx Count Sta.(DeAnza/Lazaneo & DeAnza/Prospect) 50,000 420-95xx SVITS Extensions (FO Cable & Boxes) 35,000 420-95xx Remove Traffic 5ig. Flashing Red L T Arrows(4 Locations) 60,000 Total 266,500 550,000 329,100 0 0 0 75,000 00 9600 Storm Drainage 0'1 210-9612 Minor Storm Drain Improvements 47,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 ) 215~9620 Monta Vista Storm Drainage Syst. 10,000 671,000 203,000 210-96xx Master Storm Drain Plan Update 30,000 Total 57,000 671,000 308,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Total Capital Improvement Program 5,331,400 12,367,200 4,785,100 2,194,000 1,575,000 1,325,000 1,400,000 Total Outside Revenue Share 3,128,000 10,863,700 2,207,600 902,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 Net City General Fund Funding 2,203,400 1,503,500 2,577,500 1,292,000 1,500,000 1,250,000 1.325,000 ~ t) ~ REVENUE New and Carryover Budget Version Proposed Five Year Capital Improvement Program Current Carryover New Fund Description Funding Source 2005-06 2006-07 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 9100 Parks 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park Urban Park Act, Land&Water Conservation, 3,117,200 Roberti-Z'Berg-Harris, SCVWD FACHE Seltlement, Dept. of Water Resources, SCVWD Collaborative 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park (EFt Recreation/Blackberry Farm 680,000 427-9112 Stevens Creek Corridor Park Sale of City Owned Property/General Fund. 500,000 500,000 New Project 420-91xx Rancho Rinconada Park Property Sale of City Owned Property 1,000,000 Total 680,000 3,117,200 1,500,000 500,000 0 0 0 9200 Buildings 570-9230 Sports Center Tennis Court Resurtacing {EFt Sports Center Revenue Account 112,000 Total 112,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 9400 Streets 270-9450 Pavement Management Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transp 468,000 327,000 Equity Act, A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU) 270-94xx City Monument Signs Replacement (2) Developer and Insurance Settlement 50,000 270-94xx Rancho Rinconada Street Study (VT A Local Streets & County Roads) 100,000 Total 468,000 0 150,000 327,000 0 0 0 9500 Traffic Facilities 420-9544 Safe Routes to School-Cupertino High SR2S 239,000 420-9549 Safe Routes to School-Garden Gate & Signal SR2S 472,500 Upgrade at Stelling/Greenleaf New Projects 420-95xx SCB/SR85 on Ramp x walk Improvements (Hazard Elimination Safety pgm - Hes Callrans) 67,500 420-95xx Collins ES Zone Beacons & Light (State Office of Traffic Safety -OTS) 44,100 Total 239,000 472,500 111,600 0 0 0 0 9700 Pedestrian/Bicycle Facilities 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge VTA Measure BITFCAlTDA 872,000 5,928,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge State General Fund (Sher) 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge City of Sunnyvale (General Fund & TDA) 110,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Callrans 304/BT A - 200312004 600,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge TDA (Non BEP)2004-05:$65k;2005-06:$38k 65,000 38,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Caltrans 304/BT A - 2005/2006 200,000 100,000 428-9449 Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Caltrans 304/BT A 2006/2007 300,000 270-9447 Mary Avenue Crosswalk/Parking Clean Air Grant 100,000 Total 1,572,000 6,603,000 138,000 0 0 0 0 9600 Storm Drainage Storm Drain Fund & SCVWD 57,000 671,000 308,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 W TOTAL OUTSIDE REVENUE SHARE 3,128,000 10,863,700 2,207,600 902,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 ~ ~ Unfunded Five Year Capital Improvement Program Current Fund Description 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 9100 Parks Rancho Rinconada Park Construction 1,000,000 Stocklmeir Property Improv. (roof repairs) 50,000 0 50,000 0 0 1,000,000 0 9200 Buildings Quinlan Fountain 150,000 City Hall Remodel with Seismic/ADA! 3,000,000 Fire Code Upgrades (Essential Building) Comm. Hall Reception Auto. Door Upgrade 45,000 0 45,000 150,000 3,000,000 0 0 9300 Trails :)0 :)0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9500 Traffic Facilities 0 0 0 0 0 0 9700 Storm Drainage Bubb/McClellan Storm Sewer Upgrade 750,000 2,000,000 0 0 0 0 750,000 2,000,000 Total Unfunded Projects 0 95,000 150,000 3,000,000 1,750,000 2,000,000 t.>> ~ .. . .. . . . . . . . ....... .ollCOr........ . .. . .. .. . .01;.08. .... .. .. . .. .. . .. .0800. . ... .. .. .... . . . .0~tO: , ,... . .. .. . ... ., :to:tt . . .. . , ...tOTAt... ....... .......T. > ,. "."..... ... _,.......,. _.., _..... ...... ..".. or..<."'...,................,.".....,..... ............... .,., - ..,.... i:!'U' . 'D'V'OF' ~U"'OING' SOURC'e:S . . . . ~.:..MMA:n:':<.'. ..<r: : x",'. :. .:: . . ..:.:.' .:~.:::::::: GF=GENERAl FUND 2,778,500 500,000 250,000 0 75,000 3,603,500 RC=BLACKBERRY FARM 0 0 0 0 0 0 GT=GAS TAX 1,847,500 1,292,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 6,889 ~.., EI=ENVIRONMENTAl IMPACT 0 0 0 0 0 PS=PROPERTY SALE 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 1,000,. .J SD=STORM DRAIN 979,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,279,000 RA=RESERVEACCOUNT 0 0 0 0 0 0 TG=TRANSPORTATION GRANT FUND 3,756,300 327,000 0 0 0 4,083,300 PG=PARK GRANT 6,741,000 0 0 0 0 6,741,000 OV=DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 50,000 0 0 0 0 50,000 SC=SPORTS CENTER 0 0 0 0 0 0 ---------..... - - - ------------- - - --~----- TOTALS 17,152,300 2,194,000 1,575,000 1.325,000 1,400,000 23,646,300 'S' "U'" M" 'M'" A'" 'R' 'y'" "0" 'F' "p" 'R' 0" "G" RA" '.' 'M'" S" .........,....................... . " . . ,. .' .. c. ... .+." ,.... . .. L .... ...... .......... ... ... ... ... .." ....... ", ,...'...... .+..,_....c. ............. .... ,....... . ...T.C...'.....T..........<.c.'.<. PARKS 5,012,200 500,000 0 0 0 5,512,200 TRAILS 0 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDINGS 735,000 0 250,000 0 0 985, STREETS 1,900,000 1,619,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 7,26~ TRAFFIC FACIUTIES 879,100 0 0 0 75,000 954,100 STORM DRAIN 979,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 1,279,000 PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLES FACILITIES 7,647,000 0 0 0 0 7,647,000 ------------------ _.-..~---- -----..- ----------....- - TOTALS 17,152,300 2,194,000 1,575,000 1,325,000 1,400,000 23,646,300 S"U.., 'M' 'M'<A' 'R' 'y" >0' . 'F' >0' . p' 'E' :RA'" .T" (. N'" G' : '-:M'" A' ".I'N'T' E': :N' 'A"N' . C" 'E' .......:.:.:-:-:.:-:.:.:-:'.-:.:-:.:.:...:.:.:.:.:.>..:...:-:.:-:.:-:.;.:....-:...:-..:->;.:-:.:-:.:-:-:-:.:.:.:.....:.:-:.:-:-:';.:.:-:-:-:.:-:'.':-:'>:':':':':':':-:';':'>:-:-:-:':-:-:-:-:-:':-:':':-:':-:': :.:.:.:...:.:.:-:,:.:.:-:.:.:.:-:.:,..:.::.' . .. > .. .. . . ... ,. _. . ........._ ...... .... ... ....r..<. .+,.. ............ ,- ..,......... ..... ,." .',........ ,. ......... ...... ..... . .... ...... ...... ..... ... ".. .. c _. .. . .. ...., ..+.." >., ,,".,... ........ ...._.. ........ c..,..,, ,.. ,. ".,. .......... ... ..,. ...,..,.. ...... c." ..+...+. . . .. . _ + .. ... . . .. .. ., "+"... ....... ......... ......... co..... ...+.., ........ ....... ............... 'T" C, _ -.. ..... ........ ...... .......,.., c....., '" ............. '" _, .......,......, _..., <...,. _.. ............."......... ... c. <., _"............. .........,..,.. ,.. >.. c..... >.... ,..... ........ .....,. ... OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE o o o o o ~ ~~ -. pARKS"SUMMARY' .............. .....'..... .',. ........,...,.. :::.:.:.:...:.:.:::.:.:....:;:.:::::::::::::::;:::.:::::;::.:::::::::::.:.:::::::::.:.:.FIVE::VEAR:PROGRANf:::;:::;:':..::;:;:;:::::.:::.:::::::::::::::::::: :.:':-:.:...:.:'..;.:-:.:-:.:-:.;.:-::.:. L' ., .. . +"..... ........... ,..... .., . . . <, ... ............. ......... ".". ~N~~q~~~:~~<:: . . .. . .. ...... ....... .."........ c _, .. _ _. . ._...,. 'T" .., ..,. ,..... ... ....,... ..... CO.... co,.,., ".< ..... ... ....... _. ",.. _ .. .... . . .....". .+.. ... "T"" ... '. +:'. -:......'.".....". -:.;. < ,". ',':-.', '.', <. > ,',.. <. -:'.':-.':-: -:.:->>:-:.: <.: -:.: -:.:-:-:.: -:.;.:-:':.:-:':.: : +:.>>>:-:-:->:-:-: -:.:.:-...: -: -:.:. >: -:.:-: -:.:-:-:.:-:->: -:.;.: -:-:-: -:':.: +: .:. ..:-:.:. .">.'. -: -:'. -:...... -:',' .... ,". -:':'. > L'. +....:-...". -:.....:.......:-:.: -:.:-:-:':. >: -:.: -: -:.:.; -: -:.;.:-:-:-:- :-;.: .'............. ........ 'ri" ..oi......,. .'..,..'..,......... .'.' '0:" .08'........ ..... ,.............. .:i)ifilfi..'...'..'....... ..... ....,..... o~'iil'" , .... .,................ .',...... GUJi{R~N:(pOL~$: .....................'........, 6" .........'....................... 1- ..........,..'.....'............ c......,..........,.,............ c. .,............................,.1{J..;1l ...,.,. c.. '"" _ ............. ..... ., .. .rc .+.,....... . .... .0... ... ... >, . ..,....... .0..... . ..,..,.........,............ ........... r.. c..."...... ... ......... .+. 0...'...... ...... .. .....,........... c S\:lMMARy:qF:.FUNDJN~::SOURPIE$:::::::.:::: ..:'..::::..:.:::..::::.:::.:.:::.:.:::::::..:.:::.::.::::::':::.:.::::::.:,:.:.:.:.:.:::..:.:..:::::::,:.:.::::.:::.:.::::::.:.:.:.:,:.:::-:::::::.:::,:.:.:::.:.',:.:.:.:::::.:::...:.::::::::::::::::::::'::::.:.:.:.: GF=GENERAL FUND 895,000 500,000 RC=BLACKBERRY FARM GT=GAS TAX EI=ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PS=PROPERTY SALE 1 ,000,000 SD=STORM DRAIN TG=TRANSPORT A TION GRANT FUND PG=PARK GRANT 3,1 1 7,200 DV=DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION ---..........--- -- - --- PARKS TOTAL 5,012,200 500,000 SUMMARY OF PROGRAMS .... .....,......, .. .. .. "T' '. .., .......... . . .. ' _ +. .0.... ..... ..... .. . + ' . ...... ... ......... ._'.. ..,...... ........ ...'.............. c. .. .+.'..>........T.....C................. STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK 3,61 7,200 500,000 MEMORIAL PARK SOFTBALL FIELD RENOVATE. 250,000 RANCHO RINCONADA PARK PROPERTY 1,000,000 LIBRARY FIELD RENOVATION 100,000 MCCLELLAN RANCH FAC. IMPROVEMENTS 45,000 ------ ..........------------ ------- ---------- .........---------- ..------------ TOTAL 5,01 2,200 500,000 SUMMARY' , . F'OPERATING MAtNTE . ANCE'" .. .. .. . , . . . .. .. . .. .. . ,... ,. . ,. . .. . .. .,. .. . . .. ... . .. ,. . ... . ,. ..,. .,. .. ... ... ...............,....,... ,. '0' . . ,. N' .............,........................,..,..,....,..,................................................ .' . ... . .. .. . . 0 ..,.,...........,. .r. ..,...... ,..... ..... ... .... ,.. ..... ...... ....... 'T..r"'T" --.' '0+"+' 0.. O' ...... . . .. .. . _ .. . ........ ,................. ........ ... ........ ............ .... ... .... ..... ..... ......,.. ,. .r.... .T.....' > '. .'+ .','> 0' .T.. :'.'. >>. .'.'>>. .'.:-:.. .. .'.::-, ... T' .'c. . >'. 0 +' ....... :. '.',C.. .... .<<:'_:-'<<_'.:.:<<_>>>:-:-:,:-:<<,:-'-:-:,:->'-:<-:.:-:-:<<<-:.:-..:-:-:..c.-:.....:->>.<<<.>>:-:<<<-:..._:-:-: >>>:->:-~-:.:-:->:-_.c-:,_.'.>.-:-:,'-:-:,:-'.:-:-.-:.'.'-:-:-: OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE ~;:g \ W '10. \.}..\ '\ 1.)\)\.0 I....}.j- , , , , , , , , , , ' , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . . . . , . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , .. ...,..,.,.........................,...... .....,............,.,." "n"'" , . . . . ' . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . , ~~~~~:??/?>>??:::<>?/:::>?????::::>':???:q))<::~>}}~:::}))/:)(C))):<()f~x~)rt~B::r:~*8M:r~:::j)::i<)::U::)}:?:) ~~f~~~%~M~9) ..,..,.'..,.,...............,...........,..",.............,... ......... 06.n7..m.......... 07."'8..m.......... 08'ng. .FO.......... 09..10' .FD.......... ..10 ,1,1, .FD. J:oURRENT.DO.....^RS .........................c..'..........,.....,... .T..'_..........>. .'............,.....................,...,.,..._....c...".r ...T.'..,..... .... , .~ ..... . . .... .......c.........< _.~ .>.'. . . .',.,.....,............. .~ ,...... ,".r ....r................ . .",'. , . ................_.T._.' - .~. . ...... . .' Y. .. ... ......., . ,~.' . STEVENS CREEK CORRIDOR PARK flestoflOUon of Stevens Creek, Stevens Creek Blvd, \0 McClellan Rd with SCVWD, reduced picnicklng from 4,000 to 800. Install multiuse lreN through the length 01 the parldand, construct end environmental c1anroom et McClellan Ranch and re<:onstruct park amenities and park malntenanca laclliUes. Grant Share of Project Cost City Share of Project Cost Total Project Cost 3,117 ,200 PG 500,000 GF 3,617 ,200 500,000 GF MEMORIAL PARK SOFTBALL FIELD RENOVATION Renovation of aJdstiflg soflballlleld. This wor1< has been deferred 'or 4 years, Project Cost 250,000 GF RANCHO RINCONADA PARK PROPERTY Purchase the e.lstlng vacant San Jose Waler parcels locale<! at Sterling and Barnhart tor Mure neighborhood park. Purchase Cost 1,000,000 PS LIBRARY FIELD RENOVATION Renovation 01 axlsllog pley Foeld. with irrigation and lurf I1lslorallon. Project Cost 100,000 GF MCCLELLAN RANCH FACILITY IMPROVEMENTS Replace lITigation Sys, For Community Gardens Repaint & Fumigate Milk Bam, Bathrooms & Water Tower Rebuild or Replace Gerden Shed 25,000 GF 10,000 GF 10,000 GF Total Project Cost 45,000 GF S.UILDlNGS..SUMMAitt.'.....'...........'.....'...'.....'.' :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::;::;::;:::::;:::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::F.iVE:YEAR::PROGAANi;;::;::::::::::::::;::;::;::::::;:;:::::::::::::::::;: .., ,. .. .... ........ ..r........ :v.NP.~MM~1;Q:::::: . ..... -.. .+. ....+. .....+., .. ".. . .. , . .,-...... ... ..... ... . .. + ... ................. - . .. _. . ...... .r.. >. ....... , ..+.+..+.......... ... ....... ... .... ......, "0". . .. . .... . .. ...- -, ............... ,..... ..., ..... ................ ................. ....0.... .00 ..... :::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::: :~~: :~j::::::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::: :6i :ti~::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: tiMi~:::::::::: ::: :::::;::::::::::::::: ~~: ~'o:::::::;:::::;:::;:;:::::::::::::: :~K :~:~ , CURRENtOOll:ARS::: . . < . . . . . . . . . . - - .. - .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - - . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . + , . . - ........ - . . . . . . . .. -., .... 0."".._ .... . ..... ...+.,. 0... o. . . 0...'.., >. < ,.... . ....... ... 0.. .... . - ,.... ...... o. .... . ~UM:~A:R:'!:QF:f.~NP~~Q.:$:Pv.R.C~$:::::::::: ::::::: :::;:::: ::::: GF=GENERAL FUND 735,000 250,000 RC=BLACKBERRY FARM GT=GAS TAX EI=ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT PD=PARK DEDICATION SD=STORM DRAIN RA=RESERVE ACCOUNT TG=TRANSPORT A TION GRANT FUND PG=PARK GRANT DV=DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION SC=SPORTS CENTER - ---- - - BUILDINGS TOTAL 735,000 0 250,000 0 0 S.UMMARy..OF.PROGRAM5'.'.....,...,.....,......., ,', ,.,.. : ". > - :,".: . : ..' -:.:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:-:.:. .................+........... ....... ,..... ..................................+.......... CITY HALL EMERGENCY POWER/ELEC. SYS. 370,000 SPORTS CENTER TENNIS COURT LIGHTING 250,000 LIBRARY IMPROVEMENTS & UPGRADES 120,000 COMMUNITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS & UPGRADES 45,000 MaNTA VISTA PARK BLDG. HVAC REPLACE 150,000 SERVICE CENTER SECURITY GATE 50,000 -----"""'---- -- --- - TOTAL 735,000 0 250,000 0 0 SUMMAR~.{'.OF.O:p~RATlNG MAINTENANCE: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . , , . , . . " , . , , . . . . , , . . . . . , . . . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . ., '.. . '. . .....+..., ... ...... .... ............,....... .................. ...... .................... ...... ............. .,....... .. .',: ..:.... .<:.:. '." .,. '.'......:..:.... .',:.' . ",... ".. ,"::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::~::::::::::::::::~::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::;:::::;:;:::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::; OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE ().jts ., , UJ ~ \0 VJ w (ft ) 's' ':U':; 'I';:;D'.' :J:N....G.. "S" ::;:::::::;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;: :::::;:;:;:::::;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:::;F' 'I'V'" 'E":;Y"::EA' :-. ':'R' ::;p" 'R' :0": 'G" ;RA' '';';M'' >:::::::>:;:;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:::;:::;-:-:::-:-:.::::-:.:-:-:.:-:::':';":;;:: Lo; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . , , . . . , . . , , . . . . , . . . . . , . . , . . . , , , , . , . , ' . , . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. ..' . ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. UNPROGRAMMED., .." .'". .. . ..,'. ..,." ..,...,..,.,.,...,...,.,.,.,'....,.......,.,....'.'..,..'...',...,'.'.'...'.'.......'....... <><<:::6~~{~6:>>>>%i~~i~~>:~::;::::::::>~:~~;:~~~><<<<6~~6:::~~~<>~:~;::::<~~~(~~ .~0~~~;~&~~~ CITY HALL EMERGENCY POWER/ELECTRICAL SYSTEM Remove She BJileting emetgency generator, at She end 01 lts uaefullile, from the CIty HaM be.emen! end replece n with a new generalor mounted on e ped _aide. Also relllO\'e \he eld8Ung out or date and undenlzad transformer end replllC8 II willi an efficien! end lnc:re1lll8d size vaulled InlO.fonner In ~uocUon with an lncreese in electrical .en/ice capaolty and an upgrade or Ihe meln e1ectrtcal panel, Project Cost SPORTS CENTER TENNIS COURT LIGHTING InsteU lighting on sports ""nler ianni. courts lor nlghl u.e and 8ddllloanM revenue. Project Cost LIBRARY IMPROVEMENTS & UPGRADES Chldren'. Book Area lighting Upgrade Children'. Story Time Area UgI1Ung UPllrade Lobby Service Oeslk L1ghUng Upgrade Total Project Cost COMMUNITY HALL IMPROVEMENTS & UPGRADES Oal. Shelving and Slorllll6lnslalalion Slor,""a behind Oal. in.lellallon Pallo Wall protecllva maUng Total Project Cost 370,000 GF 250,000 GF 50,000 55,000 15,000 120,000 GF 25,000 5.000 15,000 45,000 GF B. . u' ....r. L' "0' . 'I'N' . 'G' . 's' ..',.,'.','.',..'..................................,.,.......,...,...,............',......' ...'...'.....'.......'.........'................................,.....,..'..".F' 'I' V' . 'E' . 'y' . 'E' 'A' "'R' .'.'p. . 'R' . O' . "G' . 'RA' . ',' "M' . ......'.....',..'.... '... '. .. . ............,.....,.,...,..'.',...,'.'.'.'.....'.'.......'................................ ,...................,.....,.,.....,.....,.,...,'.'.'.'...'...'.'...'........... . .., '.. ". ..... . ........,.......,... j'iN' P"';"Q' 'G' RAM' .......M...E. Q' ..... .' .. . '. .' . -:-:_:-:-:_:--:<.~-:.:-:.;.:-:-:-:->>:-:.:<.:.:<<<<.:<<<.:<.>>>>:->>>>: -:.>:->:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:<<<.:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:->>:.;.:<<<.:-:-:-:. '.' : -: >:.; , '. :- ,': .'". ". '. . .:-:-:.:-:-:-:-:-:< ~. .Iii". . . -:-: ... ...................... ... ........ .......... ...... ....... ...... ........ .... .... ... .....'L.... ........... ............................... ......... ....... .r'.. ............... ::::::::::::::::: :oe;.01:: 'F" h::::::::::::::::;:: :0" f~o" ~: :'F' '0':':::::;:::::;::::::: :o;;~o~>:::~:;;::::::::::: :;:;:: 'Q' '9" ~1Q":: :f.': cC:::::::::::::::::: o~ ::: FP": c: URD"'N' ..too': ,: ';"R' .;, ............ T'" .'~........ +. .. Y. . ...... T.... .W..~. ';,Lf.......... _ ..............." ,.. ,,,..... .. ....~.v '0 +>- llJ t \ ~ MONTA VISTA PARK BUILDING REPLACE HVAC SYSTEM Thls projecl would repla~ exiting HVAC system wI1lch Is u""""ble, Project Cost SERVICE CENTER SECURITY GATE This proIecl would Inslall a more secure automatic gale 81lhe Servtce Center. Project Cost 150,000 GF 50,000 GF . STREEtS::StJt\iiMARY:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::F.ive::yEAR::PROG:RA,iVf::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::;:::::::::::::::: ~NP.!W~~M~iW:::::: . ..... . ..... ................. r",' ..............., .0....................... ...... . ...... c. .+................. . .' .. . . - _.. ........ ..... 0.. 0" ::: ~::::::::::::::::: ~:::::::: ::: b:~~~::::::::::::::::::::: ~::::::::: ~: :~i :~i ::: :::::::::::::: :~:: ::::::::::: ::b~~ci;:::::: ::::: ;::::::: :::::: ;::: :::: ~~i6::::::::::::::: :::::: ::::::: ~:::~: :~:~~~ .. .... . . ...................... ........ ............................... .,.,..... .,." ...... .,........................ ............... ......+. ......... CURRiilit: DbitARS:: . . . ...,......"....."..............." 0" .....,.....................,.....+.. "': ."....,..".......................' . ................................ . ,.r. .... ..0 ...... .. SVMIVIA~y::QF.:f:UNPING::SQURCe$::::::::::: GF=GENERAL FUND RC=BLACKBERRY FARM GT=GAS TAX 1,750,000 1,292,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 EI=ENV1RONMENT AL IMPACT PD=PARK DEDICATION SD=STORM DRAIN RA=RESERVE ACCOUNT TG=TRANSPORTA TION GRANT FUND 100,000 327,000 PG=PARK GRANT DV=DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 50,000 - . - STREETS TOTAL 1,900,000 1,619,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 SOMMARyt~F. P"FtOGMMff" ...........'...........'.....' . . . . . .. .......... ,". ..... . . . ... ........ ....,. ..+ . ". ... .......... ..., .... ... ..... .................... ........ ........ ... ..................................... PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 1,250,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 750,000 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT. STP PORTION 369,000 CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK REPAIRS 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 CITY MONUMENT SIGNS REPLACEMENT (4) 50,000 RANCHO RINCONADA STREET STUDY 100,000 TOTAL - - 1 ,900,000 1,619,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 1,250,000 ~ w~ \1 -.....:1 ;$'.J. .~eE:TS:' ;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:::::;:;:;:::::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;: :;:;:;:;:;:;:::::;:;:::;:;:;:::;:;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:::;:::;:::;:;:;:;:;:;:;:;:F'I:V.e;:):I;~A' :i:i;:'p:~^'G': "~:^:-M:.. ;;;:;;/::;:;:;:;}:;;::::;:;::; ~;:ii:p';'R:<Q'::b:i:i;ii~~~ii::p':;;;:;:; . ,'. ,.-'" . .. ...'.+...'.+.....+.........'.'..................."...................................... ......................................... ....................................:. .:.... .'. . ..:::'::~ ,', ~.:...:,~~-. ...~.......:.:.:............................... '~~~'.'.'... ~.~~':"I~l~.I;"r7 ...<..... . '.'.,. . ',.... . .. . .,. .,. .. . .,. . ... .". .". .,. .". . .., ',.." . .,.., . ::;::;:::::;:;;::::o6~7.::~6::. ;::;:;:;::<:::oi;.da:;~6:::;:::::::::::::<O$4(fQ:::;:::;:;:::::::;::~~1~::p.P:::<:::::::::::::::1~~1{~O @*Nr.:i;i~f~~~( ... ... ... ,.. ... ..... .......... .......... ..... PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT 9450 Aonual CIly funding of $750.000. Actual PMS baddog ill $1,540,000. Addlllooal G<anl Funding wi. b9 &OUght on an amual basis lor lhe short 1.1110 Iha b.cl<log. $330.000 lrom TEA-21 ProJect Cost 1,250,000 GT 750,000 GT 750,000 GT 750,000 GT 750,000 GT PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT. STP PORTION FUlldlng for pavmenl mainle....nc:e from Sale. Acoounlabla, Flexible. EfllcIent Transp, Equity Act, A legacy lor users - SAFETEA-lU, Grant Share of Project Cost 327,000 TG City Share of Project Cost 42,000 GT Total Project Cost 369,000 \0 CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK REPAIRS 0\ 9451 Th.... lunds .,. fQr lhe ,.palr of curb, guller .nd sldeewalks wIlan lh.y mael rep.I, c:rfl8rl.. ProJect Cost 500.000 GT 500,000 GT 500,000 GT 500,000 GT 500,000 GT CITY MONUMENT SIGN REPLACEMENT (2) Replaoa 2 CIly monumenla Ilgnl, one on FoothI. Blvd. 10 b9 moViId 10 S~ns Creek Blvd, .II-Iwy 85 and p.1d for by InSU'lIIlC8 claim, Replace ooe on Stevens Creek Blvd, .. Tenlau. 10 be paid lot by de..lopeto fees, Project Cost 50,000 DV RANCHO RINCONADA STREET STUDY 1fT A lacel Slreels and County Roadl money for the nelghbortJood slreet circulation 8tudy. Project Cost 100,000 TG u:. \1 ~ PEDESTRIAN/B' CYCLE 'FACIL TIES SUMM" RY........... .'. .... ..:.:.........FlVS..YEAR..PROGRAM:.:.;.:.:.:.:.:-:.:.:...:.:...:...........:........... 8Nl?R6$F.u{....~i)::::: .. . I ....1 ... . 'A ................ ., ,. .. . . . .... ... .... .......... ,., . . _ . . . . .. ~. . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r . . + ,. - .. < . . .. .. ... . ....... .......... . ....... ... ."... ...... .... ........... ....... . ., .. . . .. ... . .-... . . . . ... ...+........, ....... .. ..- .. .. . .. .... .............+........ .......................~........... . . .. ... -.. . .. . ....... .......... ....... .. . ... , .. ....".., ..r..... .....,_,.. .... "....................,..."."..............................'........"...........................'........... .............."........................................+.......,....... ....... 0 ......... ..... ..- - .. . . ..+, ..... ...................... SUMMARy.........,........................................................................ :.:.:.:.: -:.:-: -:.:- >:-:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:.:.:-:->>:.:-: -: -:.:-:.:-:.:.:-:-: -:.:.;.:-:-: -: -:.: -:.:':. ~.:.;.:-;.:.:.:.:-:.:-:,:.:-:.: -: -: -: -:.:.: -:. +.......... .... ....... .. ., ..,. .... ... .............. .............. ......... .... ......... .......... ..... .............:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: -:.:.:.:.:.:.:. :PM9:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:........ 09' .1.0.'.............................. '10"1 i . . ..... ............. ............ .... ........ ................................0$.07:............................. . : URRE...TO:Qll;A.... . : '. '.. . .-:.>>>:<<<':.>>>>:-:-:.:-:<.>~<<-:.>:<.:-:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:->:-:->:. ,........ ....... .. .... ...... ..... . Q.l'Q.~' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .' , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. · C......N........R$. ......... ....... ...... ...... .... . . .. ,.....,........................... +. +,.................... . .'...'....... . . . , ....,............ ~...'.....' +..... +. ..' r . . ... ... ... .......... .... ........ ... ........... ..... ........... .. .+,. ..+........ SUPJJMAR.Y:QP:1.UNOJNG:$QURCas;::::::::::;::: GF=GENERAL FUND 906,000 RC=BLACKBERRY FARM GT=GAS TAX EI::ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT PD=PARK DEDICATION SD=STORM DRAIN RA=RESERVE ACCOUNT SC::STEVENS CREEK FUND TG=TRANSPORTA TION GRANT FUND 6,741,000 PG=PARK GRANT DV=DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION -- ----- -- MEDIANS AND OVERPASSES TOTAL 7,647,000 SUMMARy.OF'PROGRAMS.......".......... . .. " + . ...,..... ..,...... . .. . . . .. .................... . . ... ....... ... ..... .... .. ... ......... ....+... ... . .. ...... ... ... .... ........ .... ........ MARY AVENUE BICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE 7,241,000 MARY AVENUE BICYCLE .MARY/METEOR ENTRY 250,000 BOLLINGER BIKE LANES/CABALAZAS CR. BRDG. 156,000 -- - ----- - TOTAL 7,647.000 SUMMARy.OF...... . .RA.... ......... ..... 'e' . 'ANC'" . . . ..... . . .... ... ..... .. .............. .. .........,... .... ........................ . .. .. . ,.. ........ ........ .. OPE . :TJNG'MAINT N' . E............,................,.....................................................,...................... ., . .... .... . . .... ........ ... ..... ... ..... ....................... .... .......... ................,... ....... ....... ........ T . ... . T' ... . .. ..... ..... ... .... ................................... ..,...,.. ..,.......,.. ........,... ,....., .........,.., . .. .. .. . . . ,.. ....... ..+,. ... ...........+................. ... .... .... .... .....................,... .... ............... ............... .................. ............ ..r'. ............. .............. .........'.............................................................................................................................r........+..r......+........r.....'. ._',.+.,...+........+..<................r... OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE \0 ~......:l \ .,~ ~ ~~ t riE" 'D' "'E' 's' "TR"" "r'A' "'N"'I' B" 'J'C" 'Y"'C" '["'E" 'cF' >A:C" 'I'[''']'J' '1' 'E' 's' ........ .................................c........... ........................F. 'J'V'" 'E' "'vE" 'A' "'R' '''p'' 'R' '0" 'G" .RA..... 'M" '............................ ....c..... ..c..................c.................... r.:' ': : . ::' .:. ";. :-'.: -: ;: ..;M .: -::::: ';:;:;: ::::;:::;::::;:::;::;:::;:;:::;:::::::;:::::; :;:::::;:::;:;:;:;:::;:; '. :.' ::::[: .... <: .... .... . .' . ::;:::::<:;:::;:::::;:;::;: .:::;:;::::: (i'NPROGAAMME6:;::;:: '."....."......................................................."......,........................................................ ........,.................................... ..'.....'.................................................................................................'.'...........................................................................f. '.' .. ..........0.6. ;.(I'" 7' '.1" '0' ................ "'0'7."0' .8....F. .0.'.....................0.8..0. .9....F. .O:...'...................:O.Q:;...1:.0....p. .D.......................1.0. "1"1' ":P' '0' "C'U"R'R' E' 'I'l' r' "0' '0' ["'LA' 'R' .s.... ..... . . ,......... . .......... . ...... .... ... ...... ...... . . .+. .... . ..... . . ......... - .. .,........... ..., . + .......... .., , -, ..., ... _. . . .. .. . c.., . , , '" ,..... .... . ... .+..+.. . ... .... .... ... . . . ..,........ . ..... T +... .' MARY AVENUE BICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE 9449 Conswellon of e BIcyds Foolbf1dgB on Maty A'IlMlue alignment 0'/8< Roule 2BO. Addl\lonsllundlng needed $3.5 mHllon. Grant Share of Construction Cost City Share of Constructlon Cost Total Project Cost 6,741,000 TG 500,000 GF 7,241 ,000 MARY AVENUE BICYCLE FOOTBRIDGE - MARY/METEOR ENTRY IMPROVEMENTS 9449 Impro....meol1llo \he MerylMe\so4' enll)'" lmpfovsmenIB In ",,"/Untllon with lI1e Me/)' Ave. Ellcyde FooIbrldge projso:l. Project Cost 250,000 GF BOLLINGER BIKE LANES/CALABAZAZ CR. BRIDGE 9443 Clly's ahare to widen bridge lor bk:yckllanel Oller Celabazsl Cr. at Bollinger Rd. In par\ne""'lp wllI1 Santa Clere Valley Weier DIslrIcl. Project 10 be menage<! by SCVWD. Project Cost 156,000 GF I T. '.'RA' '.: '-:F' "F" 'I'C"'::F' "A:--:C'.' 'I'L:::t'T' . I'E' . 'S"::S":U' : 'M'" 'M" 'AR" .... 'y'" ::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::<:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::F" 'I'V: 'E" :y" :E' '::JfR<' ::'p' 'R" 'O':"G' ':RA' . '.' ':'M' . :::-:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.' ..... .... '.' .. '.' .. ....... . . ........ . ..................................................... .. ... r.\' . . ..'..... . ........ .................. :UNPROGRAMMED...... :. .::...... ':'.' .::: .:::..:....:: '.:::. .:. ...... ......... :..:..... ......::: .... '.' :.:..... ..........:...:..::. .:::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::~::::::~~~i~:::::{:::;:::::::::::::::~::::~cij:ici~:::::::::::::;:::::::::::;:~::;::ri~~~~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::~~~~6::::::::::::::::::::::~:::::;:::::~~ji t~~:~t:6b~t~:: . MMA'RY."OF':F.U~DING'SOURCES""""""""""" .. ". , ... . ... ........ .. . .. .. . <... "'" ....... SU.. ......................... ........ ......................................... GF=GENERAL FUND RC=BLACKBERRY FARM GT=GAS TAX EI=ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PD=PARK DEDICATION SD=STORM DRAIN RA=RESERVEACCOUNT TG=TRANSPORTATION GRANT FUND PG=PARK GRANT DV=DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 242,500 75,000 97,500 539,100 STREETS TOTAL o o o 75,000 879,100 9;U1MM !ty. Of.':'PROG;Ri\IMS ..... .. ... .. . . . .... .......... ,....., ...., .... . c., .. .......... ... ....... ..... ... A.... ...... ........................................................... NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING M.EASURES SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL-GARDEN GATE & SIG. UPGRADE AT STELLING/GREENLEAF YELLOW LED TRAF. SIGNAL&BATTERY BACKUP COUNTDOWN PED HEADS LAWRENCE EXPPWY.lMITIY XING - CITY SHARE STEVENS CR. BLlSR85 RAMP X WALK IMPROV. COLLINS ELEM. SCH. ZONE BEACONS & LIGHTS ~ COUNT ST A.: DEANZAlLAZANEO&DEANZAlPROSP ECT SVITS EXTENSIONS (FO CABLE & BOXES) REMOVE TRAFFIC SIG. FLASHING RED LT ARROWS:4 50,000 475,000 40,000 50,000 75,000 75,000 44,100 50,000 35,000 60,000 TOTAL 879,100 o o 75,000 o SUMMARY' Of. OPERA::tING MAJNTeNANCE" .. .. .. . . . . .......... _ .. . .. .. . ......... ......... ,_.... ..r...... ..... . . .... .... . .. '. .. . .. .. ...........,....... ......................................................... ~ ~(g - OM=OPERATING MAINTENANCE .. .. '.' .... .. . .... '.' . '.' '.' . .. ..... ....... ................... ........................ .......c....... ......... ................................................................................. '.' '.' .. ...... ... "G" .D:A:.M.... ..............................'.. ............................................ :-: ....:. "::.. '.' ':-.: -:::::::::::::::::::::::/:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::-::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::.... :::.:..': ::'" ....~ :::::::::::-:::::::::::::::::::::::.:.N.'....:...c.........::::::: TRAF.FIC. FACILITIES. . . . . . . .. ............ ....... .... .................................. FIVE.YEAR. PRO. .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .IJ. PROGRAMM6Q . . . :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::: .:::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: ::::::::: ::::::::.:.:.:.:.: -:::.:.:::::::::::::::::::::::.:.:::.:.: ::::.:.::::::::::::::::: ::::'>IH):': -:.:.:::.:.:::::::: :::::::::: :::c:: -:.: :"1':0':: :ro-:::'::::: :::::::. -:::: :~::.:-: ::.~::: ::F" :0' >C:-:::-: ::R:: '6:-::: -: <00':::- :t-: 'l;.A::: -:.:.:.::: ., ......... ,..0. ,_.... .... ....... ....... ..... ...................J..........' .. ........... . ...... .... . .......... . o. ,... .... .. ..... .........................,.........,.c................................................... .........c................ ........c...... ...................O(H):r..Fp:....................OI..O~..FO:.c..................0 . I:J..FO.....................O~...... ..... ......c.c..... ~~. .... . Uj;t N:r. . . RS." . NEIGHBORHOOD TRAFFIC CALMING MEASURES Re-esleblis/i fund lor nelghbolhood lr8111c calming which requires modlflcalions oIlhe roadway. Certain crIlerie musl be mel before lund. ere undo Funding e. needed during year. Project Cost 50,000 GT SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL - GARDEN GATE & SIGNAL UPGRADE AT STELLING/GREENLEAF Inslal .lde.....ks where gel'" eKls\ on Stelllnv Rd., Gre.......af Or. end on Ann Arbor Ave. 10 provide e safe roulelo Garden SchOO. Aleo Includes trelllc algnal uwade a\ StellnglGreenleaf. Thla I. a Granl project yello be funded. City Share of Project Cost Grant Share of Project Cost Total Project Cost 47,500 GT 427,500 TG 475,000 YELLOW & PED HEAD LED TRAFFIC SIGNAL UPGRADE Thia pro/eCl would re~emp all of the yellow II pad heed Indlcalonl wllh light emltllng diode or lED In all oIlhi1 trelllc elgnels. This is the la81 p/len 01 changing ell of !he Indlcalofs 10 lED. Project Cost 40,000 GF COUNTDOWN PED HEADS This projeclle for \he re-Iamplllll QI eldsllng ped IrIffle signal units with lED countdown unlls Ihroughoullhe City. The Countdown leewfe ~villes pedeslrlan Uma provld~ and/or remelnlng 10 cross the S"III.. CUmlnUy 5 Inlereecllon. have been completed. 50 InlenleCllons remain 10 be completed. Thes.. funds will complele 20 Inlereecllons. Project Cost 50,000 GF ~..... '\ 0 ~O ~ ..... o ..... ~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . ., . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. ,...........,...........................,. ve' v' .... 'R' 'PROG' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " . . . . .. . .. . .. Tr;s.J(F~fC.,;:F'A:;CI.::IT:J~S:::::;:::;:::::::;:::::::;:;::;::::;:::::;:::;:;::;::;::;::;:; ;:;:;:::;:;:;:;:;::;::;:;:;:;:;:;:;::;::;::;::;:::;:::;:;:;:;:::;:::::::;:::;:;.:;:1.... . ::. .:E:;:'A' . :; .... .,': :D.~:M:::::;:::;:;:::;:::>:::;:::::;:::;: ~iN'P"'RQQRA':~M':'ED.::::; "'~""~ .'. .'. "'~' ....~ ... . '~" ............................................................... <>>:::<oo~(~6><><>~14~f~~:D;::<;~<~$~~&::>))>~~p<<>>~>1~~1:(~ ~~~~$Nr:~8dji~: STEVENS CR. BLVD./SR 85 ON RAMP X WALK This project wouldimptovethe cross weln at S(evans CJll9k 81. And SR 65. This 18 part of a Hezard E1lm1nalion 5arety ProgIlIm thou Callrans. CIty's Share of Project Cost Grant Share of Project Cost Total Project Cost 7,500 GF 67,500 TG 75.000 LAWRENCE EXPPWY./MIITY XING (CUPERTINO'S SHARE) CIty's sllsre of pro)scl.ldenUfl8d from th8 County-wide EKPWY. 5tudy to uPllrsde lh8 pedeslll8n Croulng at Mllty IIIld Lawrence Expwy. to connect to Ihs City's t_Uy completed 5an T OIl\llS Aquiflo.. 5arllloga CJll9k Trllil. The ll\lljolity of lI1eluodlng will be provIdad by (he County wllh II simler share lrom lI1e elty of San Jose. Project Cost 75,000 GF COLLINS ELEM. SCH. ZONE BEACONS & LIGHTS This project would inslall edV8008 fleshing beacons and Peehlng red lights at slop elgns In lI1e Collins School Zone on Blaney A.venue. Grant Share of Project Cost 44,100 TG COUNT STA. (DEANZAlLAZANEO & DEANZAlPROSPECT) This project woukllnstaq lr81flc counl stlllions to eWmI""le lI1e rnled lot manual counts for 8fVlUal studies. Project Cost 50,000 GF ...... o N ~ , \ ..t. ~ ... .......... .... '.' '.' '.' .......... .................................................................. :.....:-.-:.:-:...:-........,..-:.,.......,.......,.....,...,.,...............FIVE..YE. 'A' 'R" "'p' 'R.' Q' "G' 'RA' '. '-:M'" :-:.:-:-............................ ............."..,.., T..I!)'AJ:!FIC..F:AiC.IL.ITI.ES.'...................'........................................... ...........'...................................'.............................. . . ... .. ......... ',. ....,............................... UNpRo.GRAMMEo..-:. ...~ .-: . . .-: .-:~. .'. . : .'. : : : . : .-:':-:-:-:-:-:';':-:':-:-:':-:-:-:':-:-:-:-:-:-:':-:-:':-:';':';. ;}:;:;::::::::::o:::a':::O::1:::::F.:::O::::::::::::::::::::::{j:::1:::Q:::a::::F:::O::::::::::::::::::::::::D8+:':::n-::g:-::F:-'C":::::::::;:::::::::;::O:'9::-::1::0::';;:F.::-D::::}::}::::\'1<O::;'1<t::::'F.';:Q::: :CU':-:-:R'::RE:-:-:m':':-::'O'-:O-:'L:::LA-::::R:::S::: ...... ... ... .......... . .......... . . .......... . ... ......... .. . . . . . . . . . . ,. .. . . . . . . . . . . . _ . ... . . . . . . . . ., . . L . . . . .. _ . . . . . . . . . I . _ .. . . . . ,. ,".... ..... ........ .. . .......... . . .......... . ....- >.'......+...,. ..... . '. SVITS EXTENSIONS (FO CABLE & BOXES) This project would ln9lBlI ""b1e and boxes to conned City traffic 'aclllUas 10 Regi.....llntelllgent TtansporlBUon System (ITS) Total Project Cost REMOVE TRAFFIC SIG. FLASHING RED L T ARROWS (4 LOCATIONS) Thls project would remove Ihe flashing red left lum amMS al4 traffic signals lhroughoul lIIe Clly and replace wtlll standard lelI. 'um IIfI'OW lamps. Project Cost 35.000 GF 60,000 GF . ':T:O'RM' 'ORA' 'IN 'SU MMA' . RY'" .. .'. . . . . . , . , ., , .. .'. . . . . . ,. . . . FlY' 'E"'VEA'R" "'p' RO' ORA" :'M' : .-:.,....-:-:-:.:-:-:-:-:.:-,...,'.-:.:-..:-.'....:-:-:- ,.. . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ .,....... .. . .. . , . .. . . . . ' .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. . , . .. .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . U . H"'. . ....~.J.. . . . . . . . . . . . ,.. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . , . . , . . . , . . , . .. . . ... . '.. . , . . . . . . , . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 'N""....OwY:>.MMED.'. '.' .,:. .::-: .....:-.....'.:;..::.:.... .':-...'.., :::....'....: . . . . . .-:'. . -:,.::-,:::::::::::::::::::::::::;:: ...... .... ........ ........... "O'b'O' '7.' ............... >>}>)o::1<8:::~::::::::::::::::::::,:::::;:.:::~~:1::::::::::;::::::::::::::::::~::::b.:}1::0.:: ::::::::::~::::::::::{:::::~:::~'Q<% :c\j:~~~Ni:68~UiJr . :::::<::~::::::::::::::::::::~:. 9", .'<::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::,.:~ ::~::::::::::::::::::<::-::-:::-:~71.?~:-:<.:.>>>:...:..-:.>.'>>:'. ~:~:. .-:.:-:<<.:...:,.-:.....:-:-:.>:.. .":....' :... ,",. ,",';:..: ~....:- SU'M."'A:'R~' O'F ~UNDING' :C!:OU~~S"'''' . . ~ IYJ~. .J:::' .:~r:'.. . ~ ' . ::0." :: .n.~~. :::::::::::::: . GF=GENERAL FUND RC=BLACKBERRYFARM GT=GAS TAX EI=ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT PD=PARK DEDICATION SD=STORM DRAIN RA=RESERVEACCOUNT TG=TRANSPORTATION GRANT FUND PG=PARK GRANT DV=DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 979,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 STREETS TOTAL 979,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75.000 SUMMPi-R:Y QF.P.RQGRANlS......................... . .. . ............. ............ .... . ......................... . ., .,.....".., ,.+., ,..., ,.. .. ,. ,.. ... ....... , .. . .. . ... ... .... ... ....... ..... MINOR STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS MONTA VISTA STORM DRAINAGE SYSTEM MASTER STROM DRAIN PLAN UPDATE 75,000 874,000 30,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 TOTAL 979,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 .. $QMMA~Y:Qp.::QP.~~1'~~G.:MAINreNAN.C15:<:::::: ' . OM=OPERAT1NG MAINTENANCE ....... o l>.l ~ ~ S. '~j'!\R' M:::I!S'~'x'JN::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::;:::::::::::::::::-:::::-::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::;:::::::::::;:::::::::::;:::::::::::::::::::::::::::f"IV' J:::::::-Y' :~:^:R\p~O' 'G'd:l\:M:::::::::::::::::: '.' .', ..-:.'-:-:.:.:-:-:.:-:-:.:-:-::::::- , :I<~ ..u:~ .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . ... .. , . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , .. . .. . .. . .. . ~,. ~M .. . ~ ~ ...'.....'.....' Vtl!PROGRAIyWf;D....... '. .::-. -:'. ,'..:-,..... .':'. '.-: .'. .':-. .... ,-:': .:-:.: .:. :.: -:-:.: -:::::.:-:-:.:- ::;:: -:.:-:-:-:-:- :-:.:. :-:':.: ::::::::;::}::::O:-6-;::::O:-1-:::::~<'O': ::::::;:::::;:::;:::::0::1:::;0-:6::::::P::::0:::::::::::::::::::::::O::-a;.;o:::':-g:<;~'-:O-::::::::::::::::;:::::O:-'g-,;.<:j:-o:.<::p:..'tl:.::::::::::::;:::;:::: ()..:. '1. . ~D C:. '1:1' :'P.{-:'R"'!::"'N:::;;':OO:-::--:t.:':u,';:' :;;;;;;::: .+..... >. .,.. ........... .. . .........- . .. .......... . ..-......... .-.... . _ 1." +1"\0.", .......... . . ..... ..... . ... ........T.. . < ... "," .... .. ... .. ...... . . . ... ... ..... ... ..... ..... or. .... . ...... ....," 0.. ........... ....... ...._r....... ... "+".< ..+. .+. .+..... >, .. .. MINOR STROM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 9612 Fumllng for emergency d"'lnage repair. el nlKlded In verioul Iocalloos Project Cost 75,000 SO 75,000 SO 75,000 SO 75,000 SO 75,000 SO MONTA VISTA STORM DRAINAGE SYST. 9620 Inolalle\loo of stonn drall1l1ge eystem In Monta Viela Area. Llneeto be lIIelalled on Orange Avenue end Byrne Avenue. Design and ConstructIon 874,000 SD MASTER STORM DRAIN PLAN UPDATE The Meelel' Slom1 Drain Plan waelae' updated In 1993, thie update would evaluete \he eldsUng syelem end make recommendeliolll, Indudlng lea updaLee. Design and Construction 30,000 SO ....... We -4 ~ - 'u' 'N'" 'F' 'U.., N..D.... "D" .... .... '.' c.... 'E' 'c" 'Tc 's' ........................'...... . ...'................,...................,'.'.....'........................'f.. 'I'V'" E" "y' "'E" A'" 'R" "'p' "R" '0' "'G' "RAM" '.' '.' '.' .,'..............,.........,.............................'.. . o. .. ... ....... 'TO .+.. > ..,.. ,...,. ..... o. ,.. ......., "0' ..... o. . .. o. 'T _ c..... .+. ". ..... .......+..+... . . o. ... ..." .." o. .... .r. ... ....... ................... o. ........... .., ,..... ....... ...... ,..," ...... ...... .. .... . .. ... . ...... .0.. 0.... o. 0.. ...... .... .... ..... ... o. .... ..... + 0... .. ..' . ........ ... .... ..... .0". o. ..... '. . . . ..,.:-. . . .'. : . ..e: . ..:-PRQ~.. . : . .': .'. : .':';';':-:-:-:-::';';':':-:- :-:-:-:-:-:.;.:-:.;-:.;-:.:-:-:-:-:-:-:.;-:.:-:-:-:.:-;.:-:-:-:-:-:.:-:-:-:: .-:'. : ..: . .':-: .'. . . ... . :'. :-. :.; :-. . : ... . . .'. . .'. . . .':-:';':-:';':-:-:';':-:-:-:';-:';':-:';';.:-:.;.;.:-:-:-:-:- PARKS Rancho Rinconada Park Construction Stocklmeir Property Improv. (roof repairs) BUILDINGS Quinlan Fountain City Hall Remodel with Seismic/ADA Fire Code Upgrades (Essential Building) Comm. Hall Reception Auto. Door Upgrade &: TRAFFIC FACILITIES ~ ~ -.t. ~ STORM DRAINAGE Bubb/McClellan Storm Sewer Upgrade TRAILS ..................0. .a;....O.7...F. o' ..................... . . '0'8' 'F' o' ....'..'.............08.'.00. 'g' "F' o' ...............'.....o.S-'. "'0' "F' .0:.................,'..'1.0. '.1......F. '.0:...,'....,'..'.............. c......'...'........ .' . ...........'.....'..OI~ . . ,.............,..... .. '. ......',.....,..... ...... .................... '';'. .1.'. .......................... 0.. c. ...+, ,'_" .+. o. 0.. o. . . .... ...... . ..,. ... 0.. o. . . . o. 0.. .... . . . ... ... 0.. c.. 1,000,000 50,000 150,000 3,000,000 45,000 750,000 2,000,000 Exhibit B City of Cupertino Programmed Projects 5- Year Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2006-07 to 20010-11 And General Plan Consistency Notes Stevens Creek Corridor Park Mary Avenue Bicycle Footbridge Bollinger Bike Lanes over Calabazas Creek Brid e Memorial Park Softball Field Rancho Rinconada Park Library Play Field McClellan Ranch Facility Improvements City Hall Emergency Generator/PG&E Upgrade Restoration of Stevens Creek btw. Stevens Creek Blvd. & McClellan Rd. Reduce picnicking from 4.000 to 800, install multiuse trail, reconstruct facilities Construction of a bicycle footbridge on Mary Ave. ali ent over Hi wa 280. City's contribution to widen bridge for bicycle lanes over Calabazas Creek. ' Renovation of existing softball field Acquisition of SJW property for neighbor park purposes Renovation of existing play field. with irrigation & turfrestoration Replace irrigation system for Comm. Gardens; Repaint and fumigate bam, bathrooms & water tower; rebuild or replace garden shed. Remove existing emergency generator and undersized transformer. Upgrade main electrical ane!. Implements trail plan and decreases reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2. 4-3. 4-7, 4-13. Maintains usability of City parks and rec. facilities. See general plan text a es 2-46, 2-51. Manage neighborhood traffic and decrease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2. 4-3. 4-7, 4-13. Manage neighborhood traffic and decrease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2.4-3.4-7.4-13. Maintains usability of City parks and rec. facilities. See general plan policy text pages 2-46. 2-51. Projects that increase the inventory ofparklands, particularly in neighborhoods that are deficient in parks. See general plan policies 2- 74.2-82 and 2-83 Maintains usability of City parks and rec. facilities. See general plan text pages 2-46. 2-51. Maintains usability of City parks and rec. facilities. See general plan text pages 2-46.2-51. Maintains usability of City facility. No direct policy connection to General Plan. No conflicts with Plan 3~n Sport Center Tennis Court Lighting Library Improvements & U ades Community Hall Improvements & Upgrades Monta Vista Park Building HV AC R lacement Service Center Security Gate Pavement Management Curb, Gutter & Sidewalk Repairs City Monument Signs Replacement Rancho Rinconada Street Study Design of Tennis Court Lights for Night Time Use Lighting upgrade to various interior areas in the library Dais shelving and storage installation, patio wall protective coating Replace existing HV AC system on building. Install a more secure automatic gate at the Service Center Ongoing maintenance of street pavement, which may include pothole filling, slurry sealing and overlayment. Funds for the repair of curb, gutter and sidewalks when they meet repair criteria One on Foothill Blvd. to be moved to SCB at SR85. Replace one at SCB at Tantau Avenue Neighborhood street circulation study. Neighborhood Traffic Funds for roadway modifications Calming Measures to slow and redirect auto traffic Safe Routes to School Garden Gate & Signal Upgrade at Stelling Rd./Greenleaf Install sidewalks where gaps exist on Stelling Road, Greenleaf Dr & on Ann Arbor Ave. to provide safe route to Garden Gate School. Traffic signal upgrade of County installed traffic signal. Maintains usability of City parks and ree. facilities. See general plan policy text pages 2-46, 2-51. Improves library service. See policy 2-61. Maintains usability of City facility. No direct policy connection to General Plan. No conflicts with Plan Maintains usability of City parks and ree. facilities. See general plan text a es 2-46, 2-51. Maintains usability of City facility. No direet policy connection to General Plan. No conflicts with Plan Safety and functioning of the City's circulation system. See general plan policies 4-1, 4-6 and 4-12 Manage neighborhood traffic and deerease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2,4-3,4-7,4-13. Reduce flooding risks. See Flood Hazard text a e 6-25. Provide distinctive community gateways at major entry points. See olic 2-8. Safety and functioning of the circulation system. See policies 4- 1.4-6 and 4-12 Manage neighborhood traffic and decrease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2, 4-3, 4-7, 4-13. Manage neighborhood traffic and decrease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2, 4-3, 4-7, 4-13. Safety and functioning of the circulation system. Policies 4-1, 4- 6 and 4-12 3/tjtj Yellow & Ped Head LED Traffic Signal Upgrade Countdown Ped Heads SCB/SR85 on Ramp Crosswalk Imps. Collins Elem School Zone Beacons & Li 15 Vehicle Count Stations SVITS Extensions Remove Traffic Sig. Flashing Red L T arrows Minor Storm Drain 1m rovements Monta Vista Storm Drainage System Master Storm Drain Plan Update Stocklmeir Property Improvement Comm. Hall Improvement Funding for emergency repairs as needed in various locations. Installation of new storm drainage system in Monta Vista area. Lines to be installed on Orange Ave and B e Avenue Update 1993 plan by evaluating existing system and make recommendations. including fee u date. 2006-07 Pro' ects Listed as Unfunded Repair roof of former Stocklmeir Maintains usability of City parks Residence and rec. facilities. See general plan text a es 2-46,2-51. Maintains usability of City facility. No direct policy connection to General Plan. No conflicts with Plan Re-Iamp all yellow & ped head indicators with LED in all traffic signals. Re-Iamp existing ped traffic signals with LED countdown units throughout the City. Funds will com lete 20 intersections. Improve crosswalks at Stevens Creek Blvd. and SR85 Install advance flasWng beacons and flasWng red lights at stop si in the Collins School Zone. Install traffic count stations at De Anza & Lazaneo, and De Anza & Pro ect Rd. Install cable and boxes to connect City traffic facilities to Regional Intelli ent Trans ortation S tern Removal of flasWng red left turn arrows at 4 traffic signals. Reception Room Automatic Door Upgrade Safety & functioning of circulation system. Policies 4-1, 4-6 and 4-12 Manage neighborhood traffic and decrease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2, 4-3. 4-7. 4-13. Manage neighborhood traffic and decrease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2,4-3,4-7.4-13. Manage neighborhood traffic and decrease reliance on private autos. Policies 4-2,4-3,4-7.4-13. Safety and functioning of the circulation system. See policies 4- 1,4-6 and 4-12 Safety and functioning of the circulation system. See policies 4- 1,4-6 and 4-12 Safety and functioning of the circulation system. See policies 4- 1,4-6 and 4-12 Reduce flooding risks. See Flood Hazard text a e 6-25. Reduce flooding risks. See Flood Hazard text page 6-25. Reduce flooding risks. See Flood Hazard text page 6-25. 3~5D