.01 EXC-2009-09 Gordon BellCITY OF
CUPERTINO
City of Cupertino
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
(408) 777-3251
FAX (408) 777-3333
SUMMARY
Community Development Department
Agenda Item No. ~ Agenda Date: January 12, 2010
Application: DIR-2009-36, EXC-2009-09
Applicant: Gordon Bell, Bell & Associates (for Clearwire)
Property Owner: Woodspring Homeowners' Association/Pacific Gas & Electric
Property Location: 22330 Homestead Road
APPLICATION SUMMAR~C:
DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION (DIR-2009-36) to allow the installation of a
personal wireless service facility consisting of three panel antennas and three
microwave dish antennas to be affixed to a proposed six-foot extension of an existing
93-foot tall PG&E lattice tower and a base equipment cabinet .
HEIGHT EXCEPTION (EXC-2009-09) to allow the antennas to be mounted at a height of
97 and 98 feet on a vertical extension of the PG&E lattice tower where 55 feet is allowed.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Director's Minor Modification and Height Exception
per the model resolutions enclosed. Planning Commission action is final, unless
appealed to the City Council.
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, representing Clearwire, is proposing to install a personal wireless service
facility with antennas on top of a six-foot tall vertical extension of an existing 93-foot tall
PG&E lattice tower located in the perimeter landscape strip of the northeast corner of a
residential condominium complex (See photo below and Attachment 1). Clearwire, a
subsidiary of Clearwire Communications and Sprint-Nextel Communications, is
proposing to develop a new, high speed, wireless voice and Internet ,communications
network in the San Francisco Bay Area and other parts of the country.
1-1
Gordon Bell (for Clearwire} DIR-2009-36, EXC-2009-09 January 12, 2010
Page 2
The six antennas are proposed to be mounted at the top of a 6-foot tall "top hat"
extension to the PG&E lattice tower, which is located at the intersection of Homestead
Road and Homestead Court. The total height of the tower will be 99 feet.
.. , ... _.. ~ _--t __ _--- .-, . T ,
The lattice tower is surrounded by the Glen Oaks ~' F` ~~
~. ~ t
townhouse develo meet to the east the ~ ~~~` ~rh~~ ~~~ ~ '~~~~~~~
p..
V1~oods rin condominium buildin to the west ~ ~
p g g
.~ ,
and single-family dwellings to the north. The _ ~ ~.£
~;
townhouses and condominiums are in Cupertino; _ ,~ -~ ~~~~
the detached single-family dwellings are in Los ,, ~~. ~ ~ ~~~
r~.. , ~'
Altos. Tl1e project site is depicted by the blue f -`~ ~,f ~~~ -~
~ ~ . ,,, ~
trapezoid in the aerial photo. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_~ ~, ;
~ ~.
~~ :.
~.
__ '~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~w
,,.
I.~ :4, V, .t P,^~ 4 I ,
a~ ~~ ,II~;.~ i
y , Y A
4 ~_ t~ ~F l
~- ~'^. {
.,~`
+ ~ $,
4 z°1 ~ n
. i
~.
.,.
P
,~,_w..
~ ~I -~
~~
w~ ~"
~ ~ .~
~ Y •^
f
1 Fla? ..~ ,. ,a
~;~ .~
r
7~ 4"' k
> a.
s
F
F~,* k~°
F
v. ,• Faa~'a~ ~ ~ ~. "id. ";,~I~diF _ r ~ :, 4 t .xt ^",t ~ ~` ~i ~
a:
v~ w
#"
r
m r
1-2
Gordon Bell (for Clearwire) DIR-2009-36, EXC-2009-09 January 12, 2010
Page 3
DISCUSSION:
Applications
Typically, Director Minor Modification applications are approved by the Director of
Community Development. However, in this case the proposed minor modification is
being considered by the Planning Commission due to the height exception proposal.
Location/Setback
The Cupertino Wireless Facilities Master Plan prefers personal wireless facilities to be
located in non-residential areas. However, if the facility is located in a residential area,
the preference is mounting the equipment on existing tall structures, such as a lattice
tower. Further, the Cupertino Wireless Facilities Ordinance permits wireless facilities
to be mounted on an existing utility pole or tower, regardless of zoning district or
setback to a residential property line, as long as the facilities comply with federal
exposure standards for radio frequency energy.
Since there are no commercial shopping centers or buildings in the project area tall
enough to facilitate the height requirement for the proposed wireless antenna
mounting, the project proposes mounting the equipment on an existing utility lattice
tower.
Design/Heiglzt
The applicant is proposing a "top-hat" design for its facility with the antennas mounted
on a 6-foot tall rectangular framework on top of the existing 93-foot tall PG&E lattice
tower, bringing the total height of the lattice to 99 feet (6.5 % increase in the overall
height of the tower). The extra height is needed to avoid the high voltage transmission
lines, and to elevate the microwave dish antennas above the surrounding buildings,
trees and topography to ensure a clear line of sight to other Clearwire sites. Unlike
other wireless communication technologies, Clearwire relies on point-to-point
microwave connections with other towers, not wire connections.
Historically, the Planning Commission has supported similar applications with
comparable height exception requests on lattice towers:
1) Monta Vista PG&E substation at California Oak Way
(94 feet tall, file no. EXC-2005-17; 157 and 158 feet tall, file no. EXC-2009-08);
2) PG&E substation at Homestead Road near Stelling Road
(94.3' and 85.5 feet tall, file no. EXC-2008-17); and
3) 10655 Mary Avenue lattice tower
(148, 149 feet tall, file no. EXC-2009-07).
Staff supports the project and the height exception request because:
1-3
Gordon Bell (for Clearwire) DIR-2009-36, EXC-2009-09 January 12, 2010
Page 4
1. The project is consistent with the Wireless Master Plan policy that articulates the
use of existing vertical structures when wireless facilities are proposed in
residential areas.
2. Proposed rectangular panel antennas visually blend in with the rectangular
lattice tower extension.
3. The visibility of the proposed circular microwave dishes is minimized because
of the small size of the dishes and their height above ground level. See the
photosimulations (Attachment 2).
4. The higher antenna heights are justified because of the microwave
communication linkage between Clearwire cell sites.
Radio Frequency Energy (RFE) Assessment
The applicant has commissioned the preparation of a RFE report prepared by Hammett
& Edison, Consulting Engineers (Attachment 3). The report calculated the maximum
effective radiated power, the exposure distances at ground level and the closer
distances to the upper floors of the multiple-story buildings, which is about 115 feet
instead of the 130 feet to grade level. The exposure data was evaluated against the
adopted federal exposure standards.
The report concluded that the proposed facility will meet the federal safety standards
for RFE of 1.0 mW/cm2. The calculated ground level exposure is 0.060% of the
applicable public exposure limit, and at any nearby building, 0.095 % of the applicable
public exposure limit.
Since this project meets the federal safety standard for RFE, Federal
Telecommunications Law prohibits local governments from denying such a wireless
facility based on the environmental effects of its RFE generation. The attached chart
depicts the RFE exposures that are generated by various household devices and
compares it to a typical personal wireless service facility (Attachment 4).
Equipment Noise
The antennas mounted on top of the lattice are noiseless. However, the base
equipment does generate a measurable level of noise that was measured and reported
by the applicant (Attachment 5). Sound pressure declines as distance from the source
increases. At 40 feet from the equipment cabinet, which is the distance to the nearest
residential property line, the expected noise level will be about 47dBa. The City
nighttime noise standard at a residential property line is 50dBa. The project meets the
City noise standard.
Public Noticing
Staff referred plans to the Cities of Los Altos and Sunnyvale and mailed public hearing
notices to property owners owning land within a 1,000-foot radius of the project
property. Sunnyvale City staff had no comments (Attachment 6). Staff did not receive
1-4
Gordon Bell (for Clearwire) DIR-2009-36, EXC-2009-09 January 12, 2010
Page 5
any correspondence from the Town of Los Altos and two emails from Cupertino
residents (Attachment ~.
TECHNOLOGY, INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION COMMISSION
(TICC) COMMENTS:
Per Ordinance requirements, TICC provides tecl-tnical advice to the Planning
Commission on personal wireless service facilities. TICC has designated two of its
members to review and comment on pending applications. One TIC Commissioner,
Peter Friedland, responded (Attachment 8). He supports the project.
Enclosures:
Model resolutions for DIR-2009-20, EXC-2009-07
Attachment 1: Project Description
Attachment 2: Photosimulations (2)
Attachment 3: "Clearwire, LLC Proposed Base Station (Site No. CA-SJ00080)/22330 Homestead Road,
Cupertino, California" prepared Uy Hammett & Edison, Consulting Engineers and dated
July 28, 2009.
Attachment 4: Comparative Chart of RF Exposures of Various Electronic Devices
Attachment 5: Equipment Noise Estimate
Attachment 6: Comments from the City of Sunnyvale
Attachment 7: Concerned emails from Cupertino residents
Attachment 8: Emailed comments from TICC
Attachment 9: Plan set
Prepared by: Colin Jung AICP, Senior Planner
Reviewed by
.~~-~-~
~aY~hao
City Planner
Approved by
rti Shrivastava
Community Development Director
G ~ Planning ~ PDREPORT ~ 2009excreporfs ~ EXC-2009-097 DIR-2009-36.doc
1-5
DIR-2009-36
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A REFFERAL OF A DIRECTOR'S MINOR MODIFICATION TO
ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY, CONSISTING OF
3 PANEL ANTENNAS AND 3 MICROWAVE DISHES MOUNTED ON AN RACK AFFIXED TO AN
EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER AND A BASE EQUIPMENT CABINET LOCATED AT 22330
HOMESTEAD ROAD
SECTION I: FINDINGS
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received a referral of a Director's
Minor Modification, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural
Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public
hearings on this matter; and
WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has
satisfied the following requirements:
1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general
welfare, or convenience;
2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino
Comprehensive General Plan, the Cupertino Wireless Facilities Master Plan, and the purpose of
this title.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this
matter, the application for Director's Minor Modification is hereby approved; and
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based
and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. DIR-2009-36 as set forth in the
Minutes of the PlaruZing Commission Meeting of January 12, 2010, are incorporated by reference as
though fully set forth herein.
SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: DIR-2009-36
Applicant: Gordon Bell (for Clearwire)
Location: 22330 Homestead Road
1-6
Resolution No. DIR-2009-36 January 12, 2010
Page 2
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on Exhibits titled: " clearwire/WOODSPRING PG&E/CA-SJC0080B" prepared
by Delta Groups Engineering, Inc. dated 11/2/09 and consisting of eight sheets labeled T-1, Cl, A-
1 through A-6, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication
requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code
Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of
such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby
further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications,
reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If
you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of
Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
3. ABANDONMENT
If after installation, the aerial is not used for its permitted purpose for a continuous
period of 18 months, said antennae and associated facilities shall be removed. The
applicant shall bear the entire cost of demolition and removal.
4. EXPIRATION DATE
This Director's Minor Modification shall expire ten (10) years after the effective date of the
permit. The applicant may apply for a renewal of the minor modification at which time the
Director of Community Development may review the state of wireless communication and
camouflage technologies to determine if the visual impact of the personal wireless facility can be
reduced.
5. CAMOUFLAGING OF EQUIPMENT
The antennas, mounting brackets, and cables that run from the antennas to the base equipment
shall be painted to match the color of the lattice tower.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January 2010, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
APPROVED:
Aarti Shrivastava Lisa Giefer, Chair
Director of Community Development Planning Commission
G:CUPNT ~ PLANNING ~ PDREPORT ~ RES ~ 2009 ~ DIR-2009-36.doc 1 _7
EXC-2009-09
CITY OF CUPERTINO
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, California 95014
RESOLUTION NO.
OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO
APPROVING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED
AT A HEIGHT OF 97 AND 98 FEET ON AN EXTENSION OF AN EXISTING LATTICE
TOWER LOCATED AT 22330 HOMESTEAD ROAD
SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Application No.: EXC-2009-09
Applicant: Gordon Bell (for Clearwire)
Location: 22330 Homestead Road
SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION
WHEREAS, in order to provide height flexibility in situations where practical
difficulties, unnecessary hardships or results inconsistent with the purpose and intent of
Chapter 19.108 occurs, an applicant for development may file an exception request to
seek approval to deviate from the standards; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to the Height
Exception for this application:
1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions
inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the extra antenna height
above the ordinance maximum of 55 feet is needed to obtain site to site connectivity
for the Clearwire network of communication sites that rely on microwave
communications, not telephone lines;
2. That the proposed project will not be injurious to property or improvements in the
area nor be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that,
visually, the existing lattice tower will be increased in height about six (6) feet,
which is a minor 7% increase in the tower height,
3. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or
vehicular traffic because it is not sited within the travel ways or sight lines of
pedestrian or vehicular traffic.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED:
That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence
submitted in this matter, application no. EXC-2009-09 is hereby approved; and
1-8
Resolution No. EXC-2009-09 January 12, 2010
Page 2
That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this
Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning
Application EXC-2009-09, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission
Meeting of January 12, 2010, and are incorporated by reference herein.
SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPT.
1. APPROVED EXHIBITS
Approval is based on Exhibits titled: clearwire/ WOODSPRING PG&E/ CA-
SJ00080B" prepared by Delta Groups Engineering, Inc. dated 11/2/09 and
consisting of eight sheets labeled T-1, C1, A-1 through A-6, except as may be
amended by the conditions contained in this resolution.
2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS
The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees,
dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant
to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice
of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications,
reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day
approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and
other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you
fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements
of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions.
PASSED AND ADOPTED this 12th day of January 2010, at a regular meeting of the
Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
ATTEST:
Aarti Shrivastava
Director of Community Development
APPROVED:
Lisa Giefer, Chair
Planning Commission
G/planning/pdreport/res/2009/EXC-2009-09 res.doc
1-9
Attachment 1
____ ~,~
,,
._ a
~~
~~
November 18, 2009
City of Cupertino
Planning Department
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Attn: Colin Jung
RE: C1earWire Site CA-SJC0080: Application for a Director's Minor Modification and
Height Exception for a Wireless Communications Facility located at 2220 Homestead
Court, Cupertino, CA, APN 326-59-~!.'XX
This letter is hereby submitted in conjunction with an application for a director's minor
modification and height exception for an unmanned wireless communications facility located
on and under an existing PG&E lattice tower in the City of Cupertino. The proposed facility is
part of a wireless communication network for C1earWire Technologies.
I. Applicant Information
Lessee/Ap lip cant
C1earWire Technologies
2999 Oak Road, Ste. 110
Walnut Creek, CA 94597
Attn: Tom Derkas
Phone: (925) 202-3333
Agent for Applicant
Bell + Associates (Attn: Gordon Bell)
4020 Sierra Springs Drive
Pollock Pines, CA 95726
Phone: (530) 647-1932
Fax: (805) 456-3958
Email: abe1161639 C' aol.com
Property Owner
Woodspring Condominiums Homeowner's Association
22330 Homestead Road
Cupertino, CA 95014
Attn: Dennis Ferroni -
II. Project Description
Project Location
The proposed project is located at 2220 Homestead Court (intersection of Homestead Road and
Homestead Court) in the City of Cupertino. The proposed communications facility will be
located on and under an existing PG&E lattice tower. The project site is located on Assessor's
1-10
Page 2
City of Cupertino
CA-SJ00080
11/18/09
Parce1326-06-~S:XX (common open space area has no assigned parcel number). Geographic
coordinates (NAD 83) for the proposed tower site are Latitude: 37°20' 14.26"; Longitude: -
122° 03' 53.51", at an elevation of approximately 274' AMSL (above mean sea level).
Project Components
The proposed project would consist of installation of antennas and radio equipment on and
under an existing 93'-tall PG&E lattice tower as shown on the attached plans. The proposed
project components would consist of the following elements to be contained within a 100.0
(10' x 10') square foot lease area:
• A 6'-tall top hat extension to the lattice tower for a total overall height of 99'.
• One indoor radio equipment cabinet (approximately 2' x 2' footprint) to be installed within
a fenced enclosure area underneath the tower. The 10' x 10' area would be fenced with a
6'-tall wooden fence, with a 3'-wide wooden gate.
• One GPS antenna to be mounted on the equipment cabinet inside the fenced enclosure.
• 3 panel antennas, 3 RF heads, and 3 microwave antennas to be mounted on the lattice tower
as shown on the attached plans with an antenna centerline of 96' .
• Associated coax cabling to be run from the equipment shelter to the tower legs (via
underground conduit) and up the tower legs.
• Power would be provided from a point of contact to be determined.
• A generator is not proposed as part of the project.
• Existing landscaping screening the base of the tower would not be removed. If disturbed,
said landscaping would be replaced.
Access is provided via an existing driveway from Homestead Court.
Collocation
The lattice tower is capable of handling additional antennas should other wireless
communications companies be interested in collocation on the tower.
Network Technology
Clearwire offers a robust suite of advanced voice, high-speed Internet services to consumers
and businesses. The company is building the first Mobile WiMax 4G network in the San
Francisco Bay area bringing together an unprecedented combination of speed and mobility.
Clearwire is licensed by the FCC to operate the Mobile WiMax Network in the 2.5-2.7GHz
frequency range in San Francisco market. Clearwire will be using microwave backhaul for the
Mobile WiMax network.
The Clearwire network is designed upon utilization of microwave backhaul throughout the
network of hundreds of sites in the Bay area. This is a 100 percent backhaul solution, with no
hardline connections within the system. What this means is that the majority of the sites
transport a signal to at least three other sites with "hubs" located at the center of some of the
1-11
Paae 3
City of Cupertino
CA-SJC0080
11/18/09
rings to transport an initial signal. Because sites are inextricably linked by these microwave
connections, it is imperative that the MW dishes obtain maximum height over the surrounding
clutter and topography to ensure apoint-to-point connection with other sites in the system.
In terms of Clearwire's relationship to other carriers and their networks, it should be known
that Clearwire is a subsidiary of Sprint/Nextel (Sprint owns 51%), but the systems are not
integrated. Clearwire's network is an entirely new network. Eventually, Clearwire's
subscribers may have roaming agreements with Sprint/Nextel where Clearwire is not present,
but the systems are not integrated to support each other. Because of the ownership
relationship, Clearwire's footprint is very similar to Sprint's in the Bay area because we know
that it is possible to utilize SprintlNextel's shelters, mounting brackets, coax cable trays, etc.
with the appropriate collocation agreement with SprintlNextel. We also know we're more
likely to have willing landlords were SprintlNextel is already located.
Public Services
Public services such as fire and law enforcement are not required given that the facilities are
designed to be vandalism resistant (fenced and on the tower) and are uninhabitable. The project
does not require school or transit facilities, as it is an unmanned wireless communications facility.
Operations
The site is an unmanned facility that will not generate any noise, dust, or odors. It is expected
that a service technician may visit the site once a month or so for routine maintenance if
needed. Ample parking is available in the parking lot for the condos.
III. Land Use
Environmental Setting
The project is located on a relatively level, residential parcel that has been entirely developed
with condominiums, ornamental landscaping, and parking/roadways. There are no sensitive
resources within the immediate vicinity of the project site. The project is located on and under
an existing PG&E lattice tower and will not have any environmental impacts on area resources.
Antennas are proposed to be mounted on the tower and will not significantly change the visual
appearance of the tower as seen from surrounding viewsheds. Any ornamental landscaping
that would be removed as a result of the project would be replaced. The base of the tower is
already screened from Homestead Road and Court by this landscaping.
Zotiin~
The project parcel is zoned R3, Multiple Family Residential. The project site is bounded on
the north by single-family residential uses, on the east by condominiums, on the south by this
existing condominium development and Highway 280, and on the west by retail commercial
development.
1-12
Attachment 3
Clearwire, LLC • Proposed Base Station (Site No. CA-SJ00080)
22330 Homestead Road • Cupertino, California
Statement of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers
The firm of Hammett & Edison, Inc., Consulting Engineers, has been retained on behalf of Clearwire,
LLC, a personal wireless service provider, to evaluate the base station (Site No. CA-SJC0080)
proposed to be located at 22330 Homestead Road in Cupertino, California, for compliance with
appropriate guidelines limiting human exposure to radio frequency ("RF") electromagnetic fields.
Prevailing Exposure Standards
The U.S. Congress requires that the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC") evaluate its
actions for possible significant impact on the environment. In Docket 93-62, effective October 15,
1997, the FCC adopted the human exposure limits for field strength and power density recommended
in Report No. 86, "Biological Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic
Fields," published in 1986 by the Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection
and Measurements (`CRP"). Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions,
with the latter limits generally five times more restrictive. The more recent standard, developed by the
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers and approved as American National Standard
ANSUIEEE C95.1-2006, "Safety Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency
Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to 300 GHz," includes similar exposure limits. A summary of the
FCC's exposure limits is shown in Figure 1. These limits apply for continuous exposures and are
intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or
health.
The most restrictive FCC limit for exposures of unlimited duration to radio frequency energy for
several personal wireless services are as follows:
Personal Wireless Service Aonrox. Frequency .7ccupational Limit Public Limit
Broadband Radio ("BRS") 2,600 MHz 5.00 mW/cm2 1.00 mW/cin2
Advanced Wireless ("AWS") 2,100 5.00 1.00
Personal Communication ("PCS") 1,950 5.00 1.00
Cellular Telephone 870 2.90 0.58
Specialized Mobile Radio ("SMR") 855 2.85 0.57
Long Term Evolution ("LTE") 700 2.33 0.47
[most restrictive frequency range] 30-300 1.00 0.20
Power line frequencies (60 Hz) are well below the applicable range of these standards, and there is
considered to be no compounding effect from simultaneous exposure to power line and radio
frequency fields.
{ ~~x~' HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
+.r'~ x„ '~~ `~^~ CONSULTII~~G ENGINEERS
` `?t~ r , ~':rj SAN FRAIVCLSCO
CW0080596
Page 1 of 4
1-19
Clearwire, LLC • Proposed Base Station (Site No. CA-SJ00080)
22330 Homestead Road • Cupertino, California
General Facility Requirements
Base stations typically consist of two distinct parts: the electronic transceivers (also called "radios" or
"channels"} that are connected to the traditional wired telephone lines, and the passive antennas that
send the wireless signals created by the radios out to be received by individual subscriber units. The
transceivers are often located at ground level and are connected to the antennas by coaxial cables
about 1 inch thick. Because of the short wavelength of the frequencies assigned by the FCC for
wireless services, the antennas require line-of--sight paths for their signals to propagate well and so are
installed at some height above ground. The antennas are designed to concentrate their energy toward
the horizon, with very little energy wasted toward the sky or the ground. Along with the low power of
such facilities, this means that it is generally not possible for exposure conditions to approach the
maximum permissible exposure limits without being physically very near the antennas.
Computer Modeling Method
The FCC provides direction for determining compliance in its Office of Engineering and Technology
Bulletin No. 65, "Evaluating Compliance with FCC-Specified Guidelines for Human Exposure to
Radio Frequency Radiation," dated August 1997. Figure 2 attached describes the calculation
methodologies, reflecting the facts that a directional antenna's radiation pattern is not fully formed at
locations very close by (the "near-field" effect) and that at greater distances the power level from an
energy source decreases with the square of the distance from it (tlie "inverse square law"). The
conservative nature of this method for evaluating exposure conditions has been verified by numerous
field tests.
Site and Facility Description
Based upon information provided by Clearwire, including drawings by Delta Groups Engineering,
Inc., dated June 13, 2009, it is proposed to mount three Kathrein Model 840-10054 directional panel
antennas on an existing PG&E power transmission tower sited near the residential building located at
22330 Homestead Rd in Cupertino, California. The antennas would be mounted with 2° downtilt at an
effective height of about 103 feet above ground and would be oriented at about 120° spacing, to
provide service in all directions. The maximum effective radiated power in any direction would be
970 watts. Also proposed to be mounted on the pole are three microwave "dish" antennas, for
interconnection of this site with others in the Clearwire network. There are reported no other wireless
telecommunications base stations located nearby.
rte: s~. ~`'~'~'" HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
~;,
`'~~*.~ ~r;~~{, S ONF~ANTINC ENGINEERS
CW0080596
Page 2 of 4
1-20
Clearwire, LLC • Proposed Base Station (Site No. CA-SJ00080)
22330 Homestead Road • Cupertino, California
Study Results
For a person anywhere at ground, the maximum ambient RF exposure level due to the proposed
Clearwire operation is calculated to be 0.00060 mW/cm2, which is 0.060% of the applicable public
exposure limit. The maximum calculated cumulative level at any nearby building* is 0.095% of the
public exposure limit. It should be noted that these results include several "worst-case" assumptions
and therefore are expected to overstate actual power density levels. The microwave antennas would
be in point-to-point service and are so directional that they make no significant contribution to RF
exposure conditions at ground.
No Recommended Mitigation Measures
Due to their mounting location, the Clearwire antennas would not be accessible to the general public,
and so no mitigation measures are necessary to comply with the FCC public exposure guidelines. It is
presumed that PG&E already takes adequate precautions to ensure that there is no unauthorized access
to its tower. To prevent exposures in excess of the occupational limit by authorized PG&E workers, it
is expected that they will adhere to appropriate safety protocols adopted by that company.
Conclusion
Based on the information and analysis above, it is the undersigned's professional opinion that the base
station proposed by Clearwire, LLC at 22330 Homestead Road in Cupertino, California, will comply
with the prevailing standards for limiting public exposure to radio frequency energy and, therefore,
will not for this reason cause a significant impact on the environment. The highest calculated level in
publicly accessible areas is much less than the prevailing standards allow for exposures of unlimited
duration. This finding is consistent with measurements of actual exposure conditions taken at other
operating base stations.
* Located at least 60 feet away, based on aerial photographs from Google Maps.
~`~ HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
~~~~~`~ ' ""~ CONSULTING ENGINEERS
lry~ '~•~~~'~; sa,NrxaNClsco
CW0080596
Page 3 of 4
1-21
FCC Radio Frequency Protection Guide
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC")
to adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have
a significant impact on the environment. The FCC adopted the limits from Report No. 86, "Biological
Effects and Exposure Criteria for Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Fields," published in 1986 by the
Congressionally chartered National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements ("NCRP").
Separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure conditions, with the latter limits generally
five times more restrictive. The more recent standard, developed by the Institute of Electrical and
Electronics Engineers and approved as American National Standard ANSUIEEE C95.1-2006, "Safety
Levels with Respect to Human Exposure to Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, 3 kHz to
300 GHz," includes similar limits. These limits apply for continuous exposures from all sources and
are intended to provide a prudent margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, gender, size, or
health.
As shown in the table and chart below, separate limits apply for occupational and public exposure
conditions, with the latter limits (in italics and/or dashed) up to five times more restrictive:
Frequency
Applicable
Range
(MHz)
0.3 - 1.34
1.34 - 3.0
3.0 - 30
30 - 300
300 - 1,500
1,500 - 100,000
1000
,.., 100
N
o ~ ~ 10
a q ~ 1
0.1
Electromagnetic Fields (f is freauencv of emission in MHz
Electric Magnetic Equivalent Far-Field
Field Strength Field Strength Power Density
(V/m) (A/in) (mW/cm2)
614 614 1.63 1.63 100 100
614 823.8/f 1.63 2.19/f 100 180/f
1842/ f 823.8/f 4.89/ f 2.19/f 900/ f 180/
61.4 27.5 0.163 0.0729 1.0 0.2
3.54~f 1.59ff ~f/106 ~f/238 f/300 f/1500
137 61.4 0.364 0.163 5.0 1.0
/ Occupational Exposure
PCS
~ Cell
~~ FM
~ ~~~~~
~- - ~
Public Exposure
0.1 1 10 100 103 104 105
Frequency (MHz)
Higher levels are allowed for short periods of tune, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or
thirty minutes, for occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits, and higher
levels also are allowed for exposures to small areas, such that the spatially averaged levels do not
exceed the limits. However, neither of these allowances is incorporated in the conservative calculation
formulas in the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65 (August 1997} for
projecting field levels. Hammett & Edison has built those formulas into a proprietary program that
calculates, at each location on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any
number of individual radio sources. The program allows for the description of buildings and uneven
terrain, if required to obtain more accurate projections.
HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
~"''~' °~ CONSULTArG ENGIIv'EERS
j.'-'~~ ry_ ~ ~`x~y.~~~' SAN FRAT~~CiSCO
FCC Guidelines
Figure 1
1-23
RFR.CALCTM Calculation Methodology
Assessment by Calculation of Compliance with FCC Exposure Guidelines
The U.S. Congress required (1996 Telecom Act) tl~ Federal Communications Commission ("FCC"} to
adopt a nationwide human exposure standard to ensure that its licensees do not, cumulatively, have a
significant impact on the environment. The maximum permissible exposure limits adopted by the FCC
{see Figure 1) apply for continuous exposures from all sources and are intended to provide a prudent
margin of safety for all persons, regardless of age, galder, size, or health. Higher levels are allowed for
short periods of time, such that total exposure levels averaged over six or thirty minutes, for
occupational or public settings, respectively, do not exceed the limits.
Near Field.
Prediction methods have been developed for the near field zone of panel (directional) and whip
(omnidirectional) antennas, typical at wireless telecommunications base stations, as well as dish
(aperture) antennas, typically used for microwave links. The antenna patterns are not fully formed in
the near field at these antennas, and the FCC Office of Engineering and Technology Bulletin No. 65
(August 1997) gives suitable formulas for calculating power density within such zones.
Fora anel or whi antenna ~, s - 180 0.1 x Pnet
p p ,power densi 9 x ,~ x D x h' in mW/cm2,
Bw
O.1x16x~xPnet
and for an aperture antenna, maximum power density Smax - ~ x h2 in mW~~2~
where 8BW =half-power beamwidth of the antenna, in degrees, and
Pnet =net power input to the antenna, in watts,
D =distance from antenna, in meters,
h =aperture height of the antenna, in meters, and
~ =aperture efficiency (unitless, typically 0.5-0.8).
The factor of 0.1 in the numerators converts to the desired units of power density.
Far Field.
OET-65 gives this formula for calculating power density in the far field of an individual RF source:
power density s - 2.56 x 1.64 x 100 x RFF2 x ERP ~ in mw~cm2,
4x,TCxD
where ERP =total ERP (all polarizations), in kilowatts,
RFF =relative field factor at the direction to the actual point of calculation, and
D =distance from the center of radiation to the point of calculation, in meters.
The factor of 2.56 accounts for the increase in power density due to ground reflection, assuming a
reflection coefficient of 1.6 (1.6 x 1.6 = 2.56). The factor of 1.64 is the gain of a half-wave dipole
relative to an isotropic radiator. The factor of 100 in the numerator converts to the desired units of
power density. This formula has been built into a proprietary program that calculates, at each location
on an arbitrary rectangular grid, the total expected power density from any number of individual
radiation sources. The program also allows for the description of uneven terrain in the vicinity, to
obtain more accurate projections.
~~~~ HAMMETT & EDISON, INC.
n"5~ ~. , ~.~,
;:,; -~~., !~` ~-` CONSULTING ENGINEERS
~~.:
~u.: ~?, Is'~'r's '"` SAN FRANCISCO
Methodology
Figure 2
1-24
Attachment 5
The Sound Pressure Level - Le -can be expressed logarithmic as:
LP = 20 log (p /pref) = 20 log ((D p c N / (4 Tr ~))'~2 /pref )
= 201Og (7/r (D p C N / (4 rr)) "~ /pref) (4)
where
Lp =sound pressure level (d8)
pref = 2 70.5 -reference sound pressure (Pa)
Note! that for every doubling of the distance from the noise source, the sound pressure levels - LP, will be
reduced by 6 decibels.
Colin-
Per the above referenced equation, we can expect the following noise level at the closest property line
which is 40 feet east of the proposed equipment cabinet:
65 dBa @ 1.5 Meters per equipment specs
So using the doubling the distance equation will give you the following:
59 dBa @ 3 Meters
53 dBa @ 6 Meters
47 dBa @ 12 Meters
Therefore, at 40 feet from the noise source the noise level will be below 50 dBa. The closest residence is
62 feet from the equipment cabinet, at which point the sound level would be below 45 dBa, which is the
widely accepted interior sound level for residences. Road noise from the adjacent Homestead Road,
which is an arterial roadway, would be expected to be much higher than that generated by the single
cabinet.
1-26
~pF SUN^,
~~F ~R'~ ~
v v~~~y R,
December 1, 2009
City of Cupertino
Community Development Department, Planning Division
Attn: Colin Jung
10300 Torre Avenue
Cupertino, CA 95014
Attachment 6
Re: Referral of a City of Cupertino Development Application for-
t . Director's Minor Modification (file no. DIR-2009-36) to allow a
personal wireless service facility consisting of three panel antennas
and three microwave dishes mounted on an extension of an existing
PG8sE lattice tower with a base equipment enclosure at grade.
2. Height Exception (file no. EXC-2009-09) for antennas to be mounted
at a height of 97 and 98 feet where 55 feet is the ordinance maximum.
Location: 22330 Homestead Road, Cupertino, CA
Applicant: Gordon Bell (for Clearwire)
To whom it may concern,
On behalf of the City of Sunnyvale's Community Development Department, I
would like to thank you for giving us the opportunity to review the project
described above. We have reviewed the project materials you have sent and
have no comments at this time.
Sincerely,
Rosemarie Zulueta, Assistant Planner
City of Sunnyvale
Community Development Department, Planning Division
456 W. Olive Ave.
Sunnyvale, CA 94086
408-730-7437
rzulueta(u%ci. sunnyvale.ca.us
ADDRESS ALL MAIL TO: P.O. BOX 3707 SUNNYVALE, CALIFORNIA 94088-3707
TDD (408) 730-7501
~^~ Printed on~i~e~~cled Paper
Colin Jung Attachment 7
From: Traci Caton on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept.
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 9:18 AM
To: Colin Jung; Gary Chao; Aarti Shrivastava
Subject: FW: APN 326-59-999
FYI
From: jo christie [mailto:jchristie45us@yahoo.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2010 9:39 PM
To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept.
Subject: APN 326-59-999
i live in the complex adjacent to Woodsprings at 22162 bitter oak street. i am against having 3 antennas and 3
microwave dishes mounted on the pg and e tower. i walk, bike ride and drive by this tower, which is ugly and
unhealthy. the additions would be over 40 feet above what exists and already interferes with flying birds and
views of the sky.
jo christie
1 128
Traci Caton
From: Traci Caton on behalf of City of Cupertino Planning Dept.
Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2010 8:39 AM
To: Colin Jung; Gary Chao
Cc: Aarti Shrivastava
Subject: FW: January 12, 2010 Meeting
FYI
From: zfriedling@sbcglobal.net [mailto:zfriedling@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 10:39 PM
To: City of Cupertino Planning Dept.
Subject: January 12, 2010 Meeting
Regarding Application No 1009-36, EXC-2009-09 by Applicant Gorden Bell (WoodspringsHOA)
Location 1110 & 2220 Homestead Ct.
I am unable to attend this hearing but since I am a resident of Woodsprings I wish to state that I am
very much against this request.
1-~L 9
•
.Q.
WOODSPRING PG&E
CA-SJC0080B
SAPN0.:40861756 TOWERN0.:0/8
TOWER LINE NAME: MOUNTIAN VIEW-
MONTE VISTA 115KV
2220 HOMESTEAD CT.,CUPERTINO, CA 95014
VICINITY MAP -N.T.S.
Gdi:atnnn-;.
d'
A. ,....
'fie QQ
~a.
A~ ~.
4` ° ~
~~' F
~~ ~~
a
'` ~ ~`~+ . S cs
~ ~^ ~
N {n
~'9
Fir In
a~ Dt
y,;,~
~'~
~ ~e
~O
o~
m
a
m Louise Ln„
W
r
~osANos Ste~rens PIS Mar>hall C:t
T
~ ~.~~ ~,o~~~a, ana, ~ S ITE
"~ Grani_Rd H mestead Rd
rr ~.~,cna~~ sti~nic
6~i and
Ref4~ieil m
G
g x
~ N
b _
~`
Agfi
P
~ Pi ~~ ~ '~
~ ~ ~,
~, bL
;:-:hm~;oio ~,
,~ y :. ~ 9i
mot-
4 ~a Smear t:
~Y
~ _._.._ _
°~ 9unn v~1e
Y
i~.
Dr
h~
~~
Or
GS 9
__.._
- ~ Caroline Dr
G~ ~ ~
n
N
0
~r
t5
3
s
m
K
r
tiV Homestead Rd
Papette Wre
o`
R
m o
`~
U
`~
N
W E
s
~ DRIVING DIRECTIONS
FROM: CLEARWIRE REGIONAL OFFICE T0: 2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
2999 OAK RD. CUPERTINO, CA 95014
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597
1. HEAD SOUTHEAST ON OAK ROAD.
2. TAKE THE 1ST RIGHT ONTO TREATBLVD.
3. SLIGHT LEFT TO STAY ON TREAT BLVD.
4. TAKE THE 2ND RIGHT ONTO N MAIN ST.
5. TAKE THE RAMP ONTO I-680 SOUTH.
6. TAKE EXIT 12 TO MERGE ONTO CA-262S/MISSION BLVD TOWARD I-680
7. TAKE THE RAMP ONTO I-880 SOUTH
8. TAKE THE EXIT ONTO CA-237 TOWARD MOUNTIAN V-EW
9. TAKE THE EXIT ONTO CA-65 SOUTH
10. TAKE THE HOMESTEAD ROAD EXIT
11. TURN RIGHT AT HOMESTEAD ROAD
12. TURN LEFT ONTO HOMESTEAD CT.
13. ARRNE AT 2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
DISTANCE: 56 MILES
CODE COMPLIANCE
ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND
INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDmONS OF
THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING
AUTHORmES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED
TO PERMfT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THESE CODES.
1. CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATNE
CODE (INCL TITLE 24 do 25)
2. 2007 CALIFORNIA BUILDING
CODE
3. CITY/COUNTY ORDINANCES
4. BUILDING OFFICIALS AND
CODE ADMINISTRATORS (BOCA)
5. MECHANICAL 2007
CALIFORNIA CODE
6. ANSI/EIA-222-F LIFE
SAFETY CODE NFPA-101
7. 2007 CALIFORNW
PLUMBING CODE
8. 2007 CALIFORNIA
ELECTRICAL CODE
9. LOCAL BUILDING CODE
~ BUILDING/ SITE DATA LEGEND
~: 37' 2D' 14.29" N (NAD83)
LONGfTUDE: 122' 03' 53.50" W (NAD83)
FLEY9T14~ 274.0' AMSL (NGVD 29)
A• P.N•: 326-51-005
ZONING: Z1C-3.2, SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER
ROPOSED ucE~ U, UNMANNED
TYPE OF VN
CONSTRUCTION.
LEASE ARC 49.0 SQ. FT.
N I P FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR
REQUIREMENTS: HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED
ACCESS NOT REQUIRED.
TITLE 24 FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND
REQUIREMENTS: NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION.
TITLE 24 IS EXEMPT.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
INSTALLATION OF A WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY,
INCLUDING THE INSTALLATION OF (1) EQUIPMENT CABINET, (3)
MICROWAVE DISHES, (3) PANEL ANTENNAS, (6) RF HEADS
AND (1) GPS.
SIGNATURE BLOCK I
VENDOR CM MANAGER DATE
VENDOR ZONING MANAGER DATE
VENDOR SAQ MANAGER DATE
RF MANAGER DATE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER DATE
MICROWAVE MANAGER DATE
PROJECT SUMMARY
PROPERTY OWNER: ARCHfTECT:
WOODSPRING APTS. DELTA GROUPS ENGINEERING, INC.
SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105 5635 WEST LA5 POSffAS, SUITE 403
CONTACT:. PLEASANTON, CA 94588
PHONE:. NAME: FRANCIS ONG
CONTACT: HAROLD TRIAS
APPLICANT: PHONE: (925) 468-0115
CLEARWIRE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER:
2999 OAK RD.
WALNUT CREEK, CA 94597 PACIFC GAS do ELECTRIC CO.
CONTACT: TOM DERKAS 245 MARKET ST. -MAIL CODE N10A
PHONE: (925) 202-3333 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94105
'
CONTACT: .
LEASING MANAGER: PHONE: .
GOODMAN NETWORKS CONSTRUCTION MANAGER:
2603 CAMINO RAMON
BISHOP RANCH 3; 2ND FLOOR G00
DMAN NETWORKS
SAN RAMON, CA 94563 2603 CAMINO RAMON
CONTACT: AUSTIN BLAIR BISHOP RANCH 3; 2ND FLOOR
PHONE: (606) 392-6631 ~ RAMON, CA 94583
CONTACT: MffCHELL SMITH
ZONING MANAGER: PHONE: (925) 595-9353
GOODMAN NETWORKS PGdcE PROJECT MANLAGFR;
2603 CAMINO RAMON PACIFIC GAS do ELECTRIC CO
BISHOP RANCH 3; 2ND FLOOR .
245 MARKET ST. -MAIL CODE N10A
SAN RAMON, CA 94583 SAN FRANCISCO
CA 94105
CONTACT: GORDON BELL ,
CONTACT: SEAN KENNEDY
PHONE: (530) 647-1932 PHONE: (925) 786-3375
SHEET INDEX
T1 TffLE SHEET
C1 SITE SURVEY
Al OVERALL SITE PLAN
A2 EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN, ANTENNA LAYOUT do EQUIPMENT IAYOUT
A3 NORTH k EAST ELEVATIONS
A4 SOUTH do WEST ELEVATIONS
A5 ENLARGED ELEVATIONS
A6 ENLARGED EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS
Attacnmen~ ~
KIKKLAND, WA 98033
PROJECT INFORMATION:
WOODSPRING PG~E
CA-S1000a0B
2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
`CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
11 02 09
ISSUED FOR:
ZD 100
REV.: =DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: -,
7 11/02/09 ZD (100X) JK
6 10/29/09 ZD (100X) JK
5 10/01/09 ZD (100X) CC
4 07/28/09 ZD (100X) CL
3 07/02/09 ZD (95X) JK
2 06/25/09 ZD (95X) CL
1 06/13/09 ZD (90X) TT
=PLANS PREPARED BY: r
D
R
pS
~NGlNE~1GNGt lNC,
CDHbUtTING ENdNEElS
S83S NFST lA5 POSRAS, SUrtE 403
PLEASANTON, G 94588
TEL (025) 488-0115 FAIT: (p25) 488-0355
=CONSULTANT:
=SEAL OF APPROVAL•
SHEET TITLE:
`SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:-~
P09CL073
uo
,o~ o• ,o~ zo•
SCALE: 1 " = 10'
TOWER DETAIL
NO SCALE
DATE OF SURVEY:
JUNE 29, 2009
~_
SDMH
SITE RESTRICTIONS:
BUILDING SETBACKS:
FRONT - NOT AVAILABLE AT THE i1ME OF SURVEY
SIDE - NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY
REAR - NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY
HEIGHT - NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME ~ SURVEY
ZONE - NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY
FLOOR AREA RATIO -NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY
PARKING REWIREMENT -NOT AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF SURVEY
ALL SITE RESTRICTIONS HERE OBTAINED PER THE Gtt OF LOS
ANGELES (PUNNING DEPARTMENT), ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING
ZONE DEFlNITIONS OR INTERPRETATIONS SHOULD BE DIRECTED T0:
PHONE NUMBER - (650) 447-1150
'ZONING AND RESTRICTIONS SHOWN HEREON HERE OBTAINED BY A
GENERAL REQUEST A7 THE PUBLIC COUNTER OF THE ABOVE NAMED
DEPARTMENT. NO REPRESENTATION IS MADE FOR THE ACCURACY
OR COMPLETENESS OF SAID THIRD PARTY INFORMATION. THIS FIRM
IS NOi AN EXPERT IN THE INTERPRETA110N OF COMPLEX 20NING
ORDINANCES, COMPLIANCE IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF THIS SURVEY.
ANY USER OF SAID INFORMATION MUST CONTACT THE LOCAL
AGENCY DIRECTLY. THIS INFORMATION IS NOT PROVIDED FOR DESIGN
PURPOSES.
UTILITY NOTE:
THE UNDERGROUND UTIUtt ONES ARE APPROXIMATELY SHOWN
HEREON PER AVAILABLE MAPS AT THE TIME OF SURVEY AS WELL AS
UNDERGROUND SERVCE ALERT MARKWTS. CONTRACTORS MUST
VERIFY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO DICgNG.
THE UTILItt COMPANIES THAT SERVICE THIS PROPERtt (GAS,
ELECTRIC, WATER, TELEPHONE, SEWER AND STORM DRAIN) WERE
CONTACTED AT THE 11ME OF THIS SURVEY. SUB SURFACE
INFORMATION PROVIOED,IF ANY, HAS BEEN SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY.
ND REPRESENTATION IS MADE AS TO THE ACCURACY, CURRENCY OR
COMPLETENESS OF SAID INFORMATION. ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES
HAVE BEEN LOCATED HEREON.
ITEMS CORRESPONDING TO SCHEDULE "B":
BY: STEWART TITLE OF CALIFORNIA, INC. COMMITMENT NO.: 238311
2010 MAIN STREET, SUITE 250 TITLE OFFlCER: JAMES PRASCH
IRVINE, CA 92614 DATED: JULY 7, 20D9
(949) 476-0777
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WERE FOUND IN SAID COMMITMENT AND ARE REFERENCED ON THIS
MAP. COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS LISTED HEREON CONTAIN NUMEROUS ITEMS THAT
AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, CONTENTS SHOULD BE RENEWED TO DISCERN SPECIFlCS
WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER IN OR UNDER SAID LAND,
WHETHER OR NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS.
Z AN EASEMENT FDR THE PURPOSES SHOWN HEREIN AND RIGHTS INCIDENTAL
1HERETD aS SHOWN OR AS OFFERED FOR DEDICATION ON THE RECORDED
MAP AS SHOWN BELOW MAP NO 5128 RECORDED APRIL 7, 1972 IN BOOK
299, PAGE(S) 9-11 ~' MAPS. THIS ITEM AFFECTS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
BUT THE EXACT LOCATION OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF
RECORD AND IS NOT PLOTTED HEREON.
3 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS AS SET FORTH IN INSTRUMENT
RECORDED FEBRUARY 17, 1988 IN BOOK K447, PAGE 1763, OF OFFlGAL
RECORDS, SAID COVENANTS, CONDITIONS, AND RESTRICTIONS PROVIDE THAT
A V10LATION THEREOF SHALL NOT DEFEAT OR RENDER INVALID THE LIEN OF
ANY MORTGAGE OR DEED OF TRUST MADE IN GOOD FAITH AND FOR VALUE.
THIS IIEM AFFECTS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY BUT IS BUNKET IN NATURE
AND IS NOT PLOTTED HEREON.
ANY DEFECT IN OR INVALIDItt OF THE TITLE TO THE ESTATE OR INTEREST
OF THE YESTEE HEREIN, ARISING OUT OF OR OCCASIONED BY THAT CERTAIN
CONVEYANCE FROM EUGENE D. LEFEVRE AND BARBARA J. LEFEVRE,
HUSBAND AND WIFE TO SUSAN LEFEVRE HARVEY, AS HER SOLE AND
SEPARATE PROPERTY, RECORDED MAY 19, 1968 AS INSTRUMENT/FlLE N0.
14191513 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. THIS ITEM AFFECTS THE SUBJECT
PROPERTY BUT IS BLANKET IN NATURE AND IS NOT PLOTTED HEREON.
ITEMS ~'S SHOWN HEREON ARE STATED AS EXCEPTIONS ON ABOVE REFERENCED
COMMITMENT. NO RESPONSIBIUtt FOR THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, OR CONTENT OF
SAID REPORT IS ASSUMED BY THIS MAP.
37 FT HII
SDMH
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
LOT 5, AS SHOWN ON THAT CERTAIN MAP ENTITLED,
"TRACT N0. 5128 GLENOAKS", WHICH MAP WAS FILED
FOR RECORD IN THE OFFlCE OF THE RECORDER OF THE
COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ON
APRIL 7, 1972 IN BOOK 299 OF MAPS, AT PACE(S) 9.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE UNDERGROUND WATER, OR
RIGHTS THERETO, YATH NO RIGHT OF SURFACE ENTRY,
AS QUITCLAIMED TO SAN JOAN WATER WORKS, A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, RECORDED ON JUNE 13,
1972 IN BOOK 9877 OF OFFICAL RECORDS OF SANTA
CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AT PAGE 303.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE UNDERGROUND WATER, OR
RIGHTS THERETO, PATH NO RIGHTS DF SURFACE ENTRY,
AS QUITCLAIMED TO SAN JOAN WATER WORKS, A
CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, RECORDED ON AUGUST 14,
1972 IN BOOK 9988, DF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SANTA
CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AT PAGE 32.
APN: 325-St-005
BOUNDARY NOTE:
THE BOUNDARY OR RIGHT OF WAY LINES SHOWN
HEREON HAVE BEEN DERIVED FROM RECORD
INFORMATION AND ARE NOT THE RESULT OF A
COMPLETE BOUNDARY SURVEY.
.~ ~r v i ~ : any a vr7 ~,
HOMESTEAD ROAD/HOMESTEAD COURT,
LOS ALTOS, CALIFORNIA
BASIS OF BEARINGS:
THE BEARING OF N 70'47'10' W BEING THE
GPS TIES BETWEEN LOCHHEED GPS MONUMENT
AND HPCN-D CA MISSION GPS WAS USED AS
A BASIS DF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY.
HOMESTEAD ROAD
~~roo'q~1
WV ~
SDMH ~-
i~ ~ ~ -
A
~ ~ ~
~ A ~ L~ DRIVEWAY ~ \
------ - - 83.93' NB ro '0 'W
1
I
~~
N
~i
W
r
NI
SC ~G n
40 ~9 0l
Z
SMH
~~ry
i^
N89'00'06
-r V
1
f TCBET ~
5
NO B A d
~~5 g6
by l7
i
FS ~ ~G
~y19 ,~~1
S
_~
uNp
~Y~~
~r
s
A
* E~.12 f 31/2010 * ro
EXP:12 31 0 LS. N0. 6379 ~~ o
2
1_47
Res LOS ALTOS
~~ VICIIVI?Y NAP
w~f NO SCALE
•Q
•y
SITE
Homealeod Rd
Homestead ~ ut
Ct ~ c
,M m o
~~paro Sena FwY
8 80
- 568 45'
LINE AND CURVE DATA
1 a - 6oroo'oa'
R = 10.00'
L = 10.47'
DATUM STATEMENT:
BENCHMARK ID: HPGN D CA MISSION
DESCRIPTION; AA7873, SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA
ORTHOMETRIC ELEVATION: 26.16 (NAVD88)
TRACT NO. 5128
BOOK 299, PAGE 9
OF MAPS
COORDINATES:
LATITUDE: 37'20'14.30928' N
LONGITUDE: 122'03'53.47331' W
DANM: NAD83
LEGEND:
AC -ASPHALT CONCRETE
BT -BOTTOM TREE
BTW -BOTTOM OF TOWER
EB -ELECTRIC BOX
EP -EDGE OF PAVEMENT
ET -ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMED
FH - FlRE HYDRANT
FS - FlNISH SURFACE
IB - IRRIGATJON BOX
LIP -OUTER EDGE OF CUTTER
LP -LIGHT POST
NG - NANRAL GROUND
DH -OVERHANG
SDMH -STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
SMH -SEWER MANHOLE
SL -STREET LIGHT
SLB -STREET LIGHT PULLBOX
SN -SIGN
TC -TOP OF CURB
TCB- TELECOMMUNICATION BOX
TT -TOP TREE
TTW -TOP OF TOWER
UB -UTILITY BOX
UMH -UTILITY MANHOLE
UPB -UTILITY PULLBOX
UV -UTILITY VAULT
-TREE DRIP LINE
- -C- - -GAS MARK OUT
-T- -TELECOMMUNICATION MARK OUT
- - - -USA MARK OUT
Q~
0
EL
W
EC
W
J
H
H
~'
W
a
W
Q
0
~.
Z
~ p
~ M
- o
~ ~
O
NN
~4
w r
rN ~
w or ~
~'~ I
Z N~
I~ W ~ '~
~a N
Z
z w~~
-- o ~
w Q- ~-
J
UU Q
rer m LL
I--I ~ N
l~ ~
V o w co
Z~ ~
j ~ 00
QU ~
N
NZ
~~ n
N CD
rn
O
W
O
0
U
O
O
N U
~ OQ
lt) Z
U ~~
WJ W
~Q ~
~~ 3
w . D.
O ~
\N LJ
OJ U
~Q
J p
~O
F-
W ~'
W
Cl ~
~ O
2
N
~1 ~
W F-
w ~ Z
p W
U p J
Q U
O O
'- ~ ~
O N ~
~~ ~
'- t\ } ~.:
O m m
J Z O
Q ~ Q Y
fUl1 p p U
W~
W
TU
..L
V I
TOWER PROFILE
i
PROPOSED 10'-0'X10'-0' CLEARWIRE LEASE AREA
1 1 3 PROPERTY UNE 1
(100 S0, Fi. TOTAL) A2 A2 o
I EXISTING ASPH ALT _
PARKING T
' ~
2 EXISTING PGdcE LATTICE TOWER (TYP.
) kk
I
'Y;:
,, s x
I w
3 EXISTING CURB (1YP.) 4 ~
d~
T x VW
o
4 EXISTING LANDSCAPING (TYP.) T
0
Y
I
I I 10'-0'
CLF~RNIRE
' LEASE AREA
5 EXISTING BUILDING OUTLINE (TYP.)
I
5 ~ 18 -0
.
6 EXISTING 6'-0" HIGH WOOD FENCE W
~~
I
~ i
x
~
a
0 3
1 PROPOSED 10'-0' WIDE CLEARWIRE ACCESS EASEMENT z
d
as a k%:%/6l/6
I
x
I 8
r
I
EXISTING BUILDING
I Y
I
x
I
I I
I x
I
Y
I
Y
I
Y
I
T
~I x
I
k
x
I
a .• aw a a EXISTING ASPHALT Y
o
d RIV WAY I
Y
EXISTING BUILDING
x I
I
Y
k
~ I
x
I
EXISTING LANDSCAPE
I x
Gy
F T
~~ x
1. DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. ALL DIMENSIONS OF AND BETWEEN I
EXISTING BUIL~NGS/STRUCTURES, OR RElAT1VE DISTANCES A5 SHOWN '
BETWEEN EXISTING BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES, PROPERTY UNES
EASEMENTS 1 I
,
E TRUE NORTH ARE TO BE CONFlRMED BY A SURVEYOR,
I
'
I
2. POWER ROLtnNG AND DESIGN IS PRELIMINARY AND MUST BE VERIFlED x
WfiH LOCAL UTIL(il' COMPANIES. I
x
I
OVERALL SITE PLAN I
I
SCALE:
t inch = 40 ft 40' 0'
N
w E
''~ 1
40' EO'
~.~va~ vv r c
4400 CARILLON POINT
KIRKLAND, WA 98033
PROJECT INFORMATION:
woocs~N~ ~E
CA-SJ000608
2220 HOMESTEAD CT,
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
11 02 09
ISSUED FOR:
ZD 100
REV.: =DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: -,
7 11/02/09 ZD (100%) JK
6 10/29/09 ZD (100%) JK
5 10/01/09 ZD (100%) CC
4 07/28/09 ZD (100%) CL
3 07/02/09 ZD (95%) JK
2 06/25/09 ZD (95%) CL
1 06/13/09 ZD (90%) TT
`PLANS PREPARED BY: ~
D
5
~NGlNE~RING,y lYNC,
~~
56JS WEST l1S POSITAS, SURE 403
PLFASANfON, G WSSB
TEt: (ozs) 4ea-o>>s v~:c: lots) 468-oa55
.CONSULTANT:
=SEAL OF APPROVAL:
TITLE:
OVERALL SITE PLAN
SHEET NUMBER: REVISION=
P09CL073
~.~~a~ yr ~ c
ANTENNA LA SCALE:
YOUT _ ,
1/4mch-lft 4' 0' 4
8'
W
tn'_n' ci Gaaunoc i recc exe
1
1
~~
+~
+~
i
+ ~ "s
-~
+ ~
+~
1
+ ~
+~
'+
+ ~
+ -~
1
KEY NOTES:
1 PROPOSED CLFaRWIRE EQUIPMENi CABINET
- MOUNTED TO CONCRETE PAD
2
N PROPOSED 10'-O'X1D'-0' CLEAR WIRE 3
LEASE AREA 100 50. FT. TOTAL -
( )
3 PROPOSED CLEARWIRE RF HEAD (TYP, OF 6)
- MOUNTED TO WOOD FQVCE (STACKED)
W 4
E PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH PGdcE TOP HAT -
DESIGN BY PGdcE
S 5 PROPOSED CLFJtiRWIRE PANEL ANTENNA (1 2
PER SECTOR, IYP., 3 SECTORS TOTAL) - _
MOUNTING DESIGN BY PG~E
~:
1, DO NOT SCALE DRAWINGS. ALL DIMENSIONS OF AND BETWEEN
EXISTING BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES, OR RELATNE DISTANCES AS SHOWN
BETWEEIJ EXISTING BUILDINGS/STRUCTURES, PROPERLY UNFS, EASEMENTS
AND THE TRUE NORTH ARE TO BE CONFlRMED BY A SURVEYOR.
2 POWER ROUTING AND DESIGN fs PRELIMINARY AND MUST BE VERIFlED
WfiTl LOCAL U11LT)Y COMPANIES.
EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN
6 PROPOSED CLFJ+RWIRE MICROWAVE DISH (1 2
PER SECTOR, TYP., 3 SECTORS TOTAL)-
MOUNi1NG DESIGN BY PGd:E
1 PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH WOOD FENCE
8 PROPOSED 3'-0' WIDE WOOD GATE
9 PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE PAD
10 EXISTING PGkE LATTICE TOWER CONCRETE
FOOTING
11 EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER
12 PROPOSED CLEARWIRE GPS -MOUNTED
TO EQUIPMENT CABINET
13 PROPOSED 5'-0'X3'-0' CONCRETE
STOOP
14 EXISTING CURB
15 EXISTING PG~E LATTICE TOWER COMBING
LEG
16 PROPOSED 100A METER WfTll MNN DIS-
CONNECT -MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE
17 PROPOSED ELECTRICAL ROUTING -
MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE
18 PROPOSED AN1I:NNA COAX AND FlBER
ROUTING - MQUNTED TO FENCE
19 PROPOSED ANTENNA COAXV~L ROUTING
- MOUNTED TO LATTICE TOWER
20 PROPOSED CLFARWIRE EMERGENCY
CONTACT SIGNAGE
21 PROPOSED ANTENNA COAXU~L UNDER-
GROUND ROUTING
PROPOSED ELECTRICAL UNDERGROUND
~ ROUTING WfTLiIN 6'-0' WIDE Ui1LfiY
EASEMENT - PGdcE TO VERIFY POWER
P.O.C.
23 PROPOSED 10'-0' WIDE CLEARWIRE
ACCESS EASEMENT
24 EXISTING UTILITY VAULT
SCALE:
l/2 inch =1 ft
15 PROPOSED 5'-0' WIDE CLEARWIRE
ACCESS EASEMENT
26 EXISTING UTILITY BOX
27 EXISTING ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER
~, p~ 2, ¢, 1
4400 CARILLON POINT
KIRKLAND, WA 98033
PROJECT INFORb1AT10N:
WOODSPRING PGd~E
CA-SJ000806
2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
CUPERTiNO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
11 02 09
ISSUED FOR:
ZD 100
REV.:=DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY:--,
~ 11/02/09 ZD (100X) JK
6 10/29/09 ZD (100X) JK
5 10/01/09 ZD (100X) CC
4 07/28/09 ZD (100X) CL
3 07/02/09 ZD (95X) JK
2 06/25/09 ZD (95X) CL
1 06/13/09 ZD (90X) TT
`PLANS PREPARED BY: ~
R S
P
FNGlN~ING, INC,
coHSUUU~c ~s
~~~~~,~~
PIFASANTON, G 94588
ta: (eas) 468-0>>5 Fuc: (szs) 488-0J55
`_CONSULTANT:
=SEAL OF APPROVAL•
TITLE:
EQUIPMENT AREA PLAN,
ANTENNA LAYOUT, &
EQUIPMENT LAYOUT
:SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:
P09CL073
EQUIPMENT LAYOUT ~ 3/45n hLEI fi ~ .• o• ,~ z. ~3
~.IGQI W I C
'o PROPOSED CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA
l
;,, (1 PER SECTOR, TYP., 3 SECTORS
TOTAL) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGdcE
- - - --a--
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE DISFI 1 PER-+~
(
~
SECTOR, TYP., 3 SECTORS TOTAL) -MOUNTING
°
iV DESIGN BY PGkE
w
z
J
~
~ W
U
~
= ~
Z
°
~ PROPOSED ANTENNA ROUTING -
'
o
1
o~
°f
3
o
z MDU
N1ED TO LATTICE TOWER LEG
U
o
is
o~
EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE GPS - -
MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CABINET
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE EQUIPMENT -
CABINET -MOUNTED TO CONCRETE
PAD (BEYOND)
PROPO~D 100A METER WfiH MAIN
DISCONNECT -MOUNTED TO WOOD
FENCE (BEYOND)
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH WOOD FENCE
PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE PAD
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE RF HEAD (IYP.
OF 6) -MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE
(STACKED)
1
J
I
_~~~
att 3 PROPOSED CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA
~ (1 PER SECTOR, TYP., 3 SECTORS
TOTAL) - MOUNi1NG DESIGN BY PGdcE
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH PGdcE TOP HAT - ~ ,
DESIGN BY PGkE $ °
i
a ~
o ~.
0
m
- - - - -i-
1
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE D15H
(1 PER SECTOR, TYP., 3 SECTORS
TOTAL) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGdcE
w
w v v
(~
Z J
~
PROPOSED ANTENNA ROUTING -
MOUNTED
~
~
° ~ z°
a TO IATiICE TOWER LEG
a
~ ~
~,
°i
a
o
o
I
~ ~
~
o
~o
rn EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER TYP. -
( )
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH WOOD FENCE
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE GPS -MOUNTED
TO EQUIPMENT CAEUNET
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE EQUIPMENT CABINET -
MOUNTED TO CONCRETE PAD (BEYOND)
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE RF HEAD (TYP.
OF 6) -MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE
(STACKED) -BEYOND
PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE PAD
PROPDSED 100A METER WITH MA1N DISCONNECT
- MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE (BEYOND)
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH PGdcE TOP HAT -
DESIGN BY PGdcE
> >i.
z
~S
0
0
0
I
M
rn
a
0
EAST ELEVATION SCALE.
2 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE:
I /8 inch = l ft g' 0' B' 16' U8 inch =1 ft ~ 1
8' 0' B' 16
4400 CARILLON POINT
KIRKLAND, WA 98033
PROJECT INFORMATION;
WOODSPRING PG~E
G-SJCOOa06
2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
11 02 09
ISSUED FOR:
ZD 100
REV.: =DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: ~
7 11/02/09 ZD (100X) JK
6 10/29/09 ZD (100X) JK
5 10/01/09 ZD (100X) CC
4 07/28/09 ZD (100X) CL
3 07/02/09 ZD (95X) JK
2 06/25/09 ZD (95X) CL
1 06/13/09 ZD (90X) TT
`PLANS PREPARED BY:
D
C
R
PS
~NGlN~ING. lNC,
CONSUITlNG ~NgNEEtb
ssas rs:sr IAS POSITAS, SurtE +aa
PLEASANTON, G 045E8
m: (s2s) 4ea-o»s Fuc: (¢as) 4es-oars
CONSULTANT:
SEAL OF APPROVAL:
EET TITLE:
NORTH & EAST
ELEVATIONS
`SHEET NUMBER: REVISION:
P09CL073
PROPOSED 6'-0' HGIH PGdcE TOP HAT -
DES~N BY PGkE
PROPOSED 6'-0~ HIGH PGdcE TOP HAT -
DESIGN BY PGi~E
W
S
0
O
I
o~
o,
0
I
N
w
z
Q~
Z
z
a
0
3
0
U_
e
O
I
To
rn
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE DISH (1
PROPOSED CLFAREWIRE PANEL ANTENNA PER SECTOR, TYP., 3 SECTORS TOTAL)-
(1 PER SECTOR, TfP., 3 SECTORS MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGdcE
TOTAL)- MOUNiiNG DESIGN BY PGkE
~.- ---
/ 1
- - _ L.
3
FO
z
~_
t.S
w
0
0
O
I
M
rn
EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER (TYP.)
PROPOSED CLFARWIRE GPS -
MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENi CABINET 1 PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH W006 FENCE
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE EQUIPMENT
CABINET -MOUNTED TO CONCRETE
PAD (BEYOND)
FlNISHED
PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE PAD
PROPOSED CIf.ARN9RE RF HEAD (IYP. OF 6)
- MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE (STACKED) -
BEYONO
PROPOSED 100A METER Wfi}i MNN -
DISCONNECT -MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE
0
0
m
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA
(1 PER SECTOR, TYP., 3 SECTORS
TOTAL)- MOUNDNG DESIGN BY PGdcE SEE ~
A5
° PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE DiSH
n 1 PER SECTOR TYP. 3 SECTORS ---°~
(
TOTAL)- MOUNf1NG DESIGN BY PGdcE / 1
~~
h~
w
z
w
~ U
ail Q
= Z
0
z
^ ~
o
°' 3
°i o
K
~ PROPOSED ANTENNA ROUTING
°
i
To
°f EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER (IYP.)
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH WOOD FENCE PROPOSED CIFARWIRE GPS - M
Ol1N1ED
TO EQUIPMENT CABINET
PROPOSED t00A METER WfiH MAIN
DISCONNECT -MOUNTED TO WOOD PROPOSED CIEARWIRE EQUIPMEM CABINET
FENCE (BEYOND) -MOUNTED TO CONCRETE PAD (BEYOND)
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE RF HEAD
° (TYP. OF 6) -MOUNTED TO WOOD
i FENCE (STACKED) -BEYOND
FlNISHED GRADE
PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE PAD
W
O
c~
z
w
0
a
0
°
I
i~
a
a
0
0
WEST ELEVATION SCALE.
2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:
l/8 inch = l ft g' p' g' 16~ U8 inch =1 ft s' m u~ i a 1
4400 CARILLON POINT
KIRKLAND, WA 98033
PROJECT INFORMATION:
WOODSPRING PG~E
CA-SJ00080B
2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
11 02 09
ISSUED FOR:
ZD 100
REV.: =DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY: --,
11/02/09 ZD (100X) JK
6 10/29/09 ZD (100X) JK
5 10/01/09 ZD (100X) CC
4 07/28/09 ZD (100X) CL
3 07/02/09 ZD (95X) JK
2 06/25/09 ZD (95X) CL
1 06/13/09 ZD (90X) TT
PLANS PREPARED BY: ~
D G
RO
P
ENGINE~IGHG. lNC,
coMSU>~rurc ~ru~
5635 WEST lAS POSITAS, SURE 403
PLFASANfON, G 04566
ta: (ors) 4Q6-o>>s Fix: (ess) 48A-o355
CONSULTANT:
,-SEAL OF APPROVAL•
SHEET TITLE:
SOUTH & WEST
ELEVATIONS
SHEET NUMBER: REVISION=
P09CL073
~-I~iQI YY I G
PROPOSED CIEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA
(IYP. OF 3) - MOUNTING DESIGN BY
PGikE
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA (tYP. OF
3) - MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGdcE
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE DISH -
(1YP. OF 3) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGdcE
a
0
N
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE DISH °a
(IYP. OF 3) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGkE &
x
v
x
0
~o
PROPOSED C(.FARN9RE PANEL ANTENNA
(IYP. OF 3) - MOUNi1NG DESIGN B1f
PGdcE
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH TOP HAT TO REPIACE
EXISTING 6'-D' HIGH TOP HAT -DESIGN BY PGkE
EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER
a
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE COAXAAI. CABLE RUN
EAST ELEVATION
PROPOSED CLEAR~IRE MICROWAVE
DISH (IYP. OF 3) - MOUNTING
DESIGN BY PGdcE
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE COAXIAL CABLE
RUN
S`A`E: I ~ 3 ~ NORTH ELEVATION
I inch = I fl 2• p~ p q.
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE PANEL ANTENNA (TYP. OF
3) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGdcE
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE
DISH (TYP. OF 3) -MOUNTING
DESIGN BY PGdcE
a
0
w
w
°a
a
x
c~
x
0
I
ie
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH TOP HAT TO REPLACE
EXISTING 6'-0~ HIGH TOP HAT -DESIGN BY PG~E
EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE DISH -
(TYP. OF 3) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PGdcE
i
s
PROPOSED CLEARWIRE MICROWAVE DISH
(TYP. OF 3) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PG~E
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH TOP HAT TO REPLACE
EXISTING 6'-D' HIGH TOP WIT -DESIGN BY PGdcE
EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER
a
0
0
a
x
c~
x
0
i
~o
SCALE:
lC1 inch =1 ft 2' 0' ~ I
2 4'
PROPOSED CLF.ARNIRE PANEL ANTENNA (1YP.
OF 3) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PG~E
PROPOSED CLFARWIRE MICROWAVE DISH
(TYP. OF 3) -MOUNTING DESIGN BY PG~E
a
0
v
w
N
a
x
c~
x
0
I
iC
PROPOSED 6'-0' HIGH TOP HAT TO REPLACE
EXISTING 6'-O' HIGH TOP HAT -DESIGN BY PGdcE
EXISTING PG&E LATTICE TOWER
~ WEST ELEVATION I SCALE: 4 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE:
~a' n-~e 2~ o• >
irz h Ift z n ~ L
4400 CARILLON POINT
KIRKLAND, WA 98033
PROJECT INFORMATION:
woo~s~NC rc~
CA-SJ000806
2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CURRENT ISSUE DATE;
11 02 09
ISSUED FOR:
ZD 100
~REV.::DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY; ~
7 11/02/09 ZD (100X) JK
6 10/29/09 ZD (100X) JK
5 10/01/09 ZD (100X) CC
4 07/28/09 ZD (100X) CL
3 07/02/09 ZD (95X) JK
2 06/25/09 ZD (95X) CL
1 06/13/09 ZD (90X) TT
`PLANS PREPARED BY: ~
D
C
R S
P
FNGlN~ltlNG, INC,
coMSUUU~ n~an~ls
5635 wEST us PoS~TAS, SurtE ~
PLFASANION, G A4566
TEL• (925) 166-0115 FA%: (925} 166-OJ55
CONSULTANT:
SEAL OF APPROVAL•
IFFY TITLE;
ENLARGED NORTH,
SOUTH, EAST & WEST
ELEVATIONS
`SHEET NUMBER: REVISION=
P09CL073
KEY NOTES:
1 PROPOSED CLEARWIRE EQUIPMENT C~18MEi - MOUN)ED TO
CONCRETE PAD
2 PROPOSED CLEARWIRE RF HEAD (IYP. OF 6) -
MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE (STACKED)
3 PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH WOOD FENCE
4 PROPOSED 6' HIGH CONCRETE PAD
5 PROPOSED CLEARWIRE GPS -MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT
CABINET
6 PROPOSED 5'-0'k3'-0" CONCRETE STODP
PROPOSED 100q METER WfiH IWN DISCONNECT -
~ MOUNTED TO WOOD FENCE
NORTH ELEVATION
0
II
I
I
I
I I
I
I
I
I
I r
I -_ -__ _-_ ~,
II
I
I
-
I
I I
III
III
I'll I
II r
I
I
I
I ~
I
I
I
I ll
II
I)
II
I
I
II h I
I I
I II
II
II H
III
I I
I
I I I
I
I
~
_ I
I
I
~ II
II
II
II
II
II
JI
II II
II
II
C
C
C
O
EAST ELEVATION
-o
4400 CARILLON POINT
KIRKLAND, WA 98033
PROJECT INFORMATION:
WOODSPRING PG~E
CA-SJ00080B
2220 HOMESTEAD CT.
CUPERTINO, CA 95014
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
CURRENT ISSUE DATE:
11 02 09
ISSUED FOR:
ZD 100%
REV.: =DATE: DESCRIPTION: BY:
11/02/09 ZD (t00X JK
7 )
6 10/29/09 ZD (tODX) JK
5 10/01/09 ZD (100X) CC
4 07/28/09 ZO (100X) CL
3 07/02/09 ZD (95X) JK
2 06/25/09 ZD (95X) CL
1 06/13/09 ZD (90X) TT
=PLANS PREPARED BY:
D
RO
PS
FNGINF~lNG, lNC,
corl~-u~HCa~wur~
5635 WEST us POStTAS, SURE ,03
PL6lSANTON, CA 94566
IEL; (925) 466-0115 FAX: (925) X68-0355
ENLARGED EQUIPMENT ELEVATIONS
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE:
314 inch = l ft I' p~ 1' ~ 1
2 3'
:SEAL OF APPROVAL:
EET TTTLE:
ENLARGED EQUIPMENT
ELEVATIONS
UNUSED UNUSED UNUSED UNUSED _
SHEET NUMBER: REVISION=
P09CL073