Loading...
.02 U-2008-03 AT&T MobilityCITY OF CUPERTINO City of Cupertino 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, CA 95014 (408)777-3251 FAX (408) 777-3333 Community Development Department SUMMARY Agenda Item No. ~ Agenda Date: August 11, 2009 Application: U-2008-03, EXC-2009-05 Applicant: Phillip Thomas, Black Dot Wireless (for AT&T Mobility) Property Owner: ECI Two Results, LLC Property Location: near 5 Results Way Application Summary: USE PERMIT (U-2008-03) to allow a personal wireless service facility consisting of a 74- foot tall tree pole with six panel antennas and an equipment enclosure with the associated equipment in the westerly landscape strip in the rear parking lot of an existing office park. HEIGHT EXCEPTION (EXC-2009-05) to allow antennas to be mounted at a height of 67.1 feet where 55 feet is allowed. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the use permit and height exception per the model resolutions (Attachment 1). Planning Commission action is final, unless appealed to the City Council. PROJECT DATA: Property Zoning: Height of Treepole: Height of Antennas: Required Setback: Proposed Setback: Environmental Determination: Planned Development, Light Industrial Intent - P(ML) 74 feet (measured from grade to foliage top) 67.1 feet 75 feet (from residential property) 161 feet to Imperial Ave. residence 315 feet to Olive Ave. residence 370 feet to Astoria townhouses Categorical Exemption, Section 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures 2-1 Phillip Thomas (for AT&T Wireless) U-2008-03, EXC-2009-OS August 11, 2009 Page 2 BACKGROUND: The applicant, Phillip Thomas (representing AT&T Mobility) is proposing a personal wireless service facility to be located in the westerly landscape strip of the rear parking lot of the Results Way office park. It consists of a tree pole with six panel antennas and base equipment within a concrete block enclosure. The tree pole will be designed for collocation so that more antennas and base equipment may be added by other wireless carriers in the future. The proposed location is in a landscaped setback on the western edge of the property and is surrounded by office and industrial land uses with a minimum distance from a residential property line of 161 feet (see aerial map below). The project will not obstruct the approved redevelopment plans for the Results Way nffi~e nr~iert_ 2-2 O Proposed Location of AT& T cell site Phillip Thomas (for AT&T Wireless) U-2008-03, EXC-2009-OS August 11, 2009 Page 3 The City's Technology, Information and Communications Commission (TICC) has previously conducted an on-line survey of residents and workers to identify cell phone usage and issues. AT&T was found to be one of two wireless carriers to have the widest subscription bases in Cupertino, and the Bubb Road/McClellan Road area was identified as the #1 problem area for lack of cell phone coverage. The existing and proposed AT&T phone coverage is depicted in Attachment 2. DISCUSSION: Site Location. The AT&T tree pole is proposed in the westerly landscape strip of the office park which has numerous tall and large trees to the south and smaller trees to the north. The proposed location is two to four times the required 75-foot setback from a residentially zoned property. Treepole and Enclosure Appearance The appearance of the tree pole will be comparable to more modern tree pole designs, like the faux pine treepole located near the southwest corner of Miller Avenue and Richwood Avenue. The tree design includes: • faux bark cladding • an artificial pine branch structure that will resemble a tree and obscure the antenna rack • Pine needle covers that will obscure the panel antenna even further (Attachment 3) Even though there are many tall, mature trees in the office park's westerly landscape strip, the immediate tree pole vicinity is occupied with smaller stature trees, which makes it more challenging to blend in the treepole. To achieve a more natural and realistic tree image, staff is recommending the following changes to the tree pole: • The needle camouflage shall be a more mottled green color, which is more natural looking than the deep forest green color found on the Miller Avenue tree • The top half of the treepole shall be designed with a more conical form to simulate the shape of a real pine tree. In addition, staff recommends the following change to the base equipment screen wall (6-foot tall concrete block wall): • The base equipment screen wall shall be clad with high quality metal panels with a color to match the metal work in the approved office project. Area around the enclosure shall be landscaped with shrubs, except the entry area. All of the above recommendations are incorporated in the conditions of approval. 2-3 Phillip Thomas (for AT&T Wireless) U-2008-03, EXC-2009-OS August 11, 2009 Page 4 Height Exception Request. The applicant is proposing a maximum height of 67.1 feet for the antennas, whereas, 55 feet is allowed. The extra height is needed because the rear grade of the office park is much lower (19.2 feet lower) than the McClellan Road grade and the antennas must "see" over the tops of the adjacent office buildings to provide phone coverage to the neighborhood to the south. Radio Frequency Radiation Assessment. AT&T wireless ~ commissioned the preparation of a radio frequency radiation (RFR) assessment (Attachment 4) to determine the projected radio emission levels and compare them against the federal exposure safety standards. The report concluded that the project is within the federal safety standards for RFR exposure. In accordance with Federal law, local agencies are prohibited from regulating such facilities on the basis of the environmental effects of RF emissions if the emissions meet federal safety standards. Referral and Noticing In accordance with the recently revised ordinance, the plans and supporting documentation were referred to designated members of the TICC. TICC commissioner Peter Friedland responded (Attachment 5). He said: He strongly supported the project. The facility would be well concealed by its location in an industrial park and its tree camouflage. The facility meets federal safety standards for RF emissions and would address the single greatest cell phone coverage problem identified in last year's TICC survey. Public hearing noticing was mailed to a 1,000-foot radius of the project property. Enclosures: Attachment 1: Model resolutions for U-2008-03, EXC-2009-05 Attachment 2: Existing & Proposed Coverage Map Attachment 3: Photosimulations of treepole (2) Attachment 4: Radio Frequency Analysis, AT&T Mobility Site #CN3242 By Evan Wappel dated 6/11/09 Attachment 5: Email from Peter Friedland, TIC Commissioner Attachment 6: Plan Set Prepared by: Colin Jung AICP, Senior Planner 2-4 Attachment 1 U-2008-03 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVNG A USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE CONSTRUCTION OF A PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY, CONSISTING OF A 74-FOOT TALL TREEPOLE WITH SIX PANEL ANTENNAS AND AN EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE WITH THE ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT NEAR 5 RESULTS WAY SECTION I: FINDINGS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for a Use Permit, as described in Section II. of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and the purpose of this title. 3) That the operation of the facility will comply with federal safety standards for radio frequency radiation emissions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Use Permit is hereby approval, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application 2-6 Resolution No. U-2008-03 August 11, 2009 Page 2 No. U-2008-03 as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of August 11, 2009 and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION II: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: U-2008-03 Applicant: Phillip Thomas (for AT&T Mobility) Property Owner: ECI Two Results, LLC Location: Near 5 Results Way SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: " at&t/CN3242-A/November Drive/Results Way/Cupertino, California 95014" prepared by Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. dated 07/02/09 and consisting of six sheets labeled T-1, A-0 through A-3, and LS-1, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 3. COLOCATION OF ANTENNAE The treepole shall be structurally designed to accommodate the collocation of additional antennae from other wireless carriers. The co-location agreement shall be at market rates with reasonable compensation to the mast owner. 4. ABANDONMENT If after installation, the aerial is not used for its permitted purpose for a continuous period of 18 months, said aerial and associated facilities shall be removed. The applicant shall bear the entire cost of demolition. 2-7 Resolution No. U-2008-03 August 11, 2009 Page 3 5. EXPIRATION DATE This use permit shall expire ten (10) years after the effective date of the permit. The applicant may apply for a renewal of the use permit at which time the Planning Commission may review the state of wireless communication technologies, camouflage techniques and maintenance to determine if the visual impact of the aerial facility can be reduced. 6. TREE POLE APPEARANCE AND MAINTENANCE The applicant shall use a sufficient number of artificial branches to obscure the appearance of the panel antennae and any associated mounting framework. The top portion of the tree pole shall have branches of varying length to give the tree pole a conical form. Panel antennae mounted away from the mast shall have needle covers to blend with the green foliage of the artificial branches. The mast and any panel antennae mounted close to the mast shall be painted brown to mimic a tree trunk. The foliage shall have a mottled green coloration. The building permit shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director to ensure the above condition is met. The applicant shall perform regular maintenance of the tree pole to maintain its appearance and obscure the panel antennae from public view. 7. EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE The base equipment screening enclosure shall be clad with high quality metal panels with a color to match the metal work in the abutting approved office building project. The building permit shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director to ensure the above condition is met. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 11th day of August 2009, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Lisa Giefer, Chair Community Development Director Planning Commission g:/planning/pdreport/res/2009/EXC-2008-03 res.doc 2-8 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. EXC-2009-OS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A HEIGHT EXCEPTION TO ALLOW PANEL ANTENNAS TO BE MOUNTED AT A HEIGHT OF ABOUT 67.1 FEET ON A TREEPOLE-STYLE PERSONAL WIRELESS SERVICE FACILITY LOCATED NEAR 5 RESULTS WAY SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: EXC-2009-OS Applicant: Phillip Thomas (for AT&T Mobility) Location: Near 5 Results Way SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR EXCEPTION WHEREAS, in order to provide height flexibility in situations where practical difficulties, unnecessary hardships or results inconsistent with the purpose and intent of Chapter 19.108 occur, an applicant for development may file an exception request to seek approval to deviate from the standards; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds the following with regards to the Height Exception for this application: 1. That the literal enforcement of the provisions of this title will result in restrictions inconsistent with the spirit and intent of this title in that the extra antenna height above the ordinance maximum of 55 feet is needed because the treepole rests in a location below the grade of the neighborhood that will be serviced with telephone coverage. 2. That the proposed project will not be injurious to property or improvements in the area nor be materially detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare in that: • the wireless technology produces radiation below federal exposure standards, • visually, the treepole will appear shorter as the adjacent property grade is 6 feet higher than the project site. 3. The proposed development will not create a hazardous condition for pedestrian or vehicular traffic because it is not sited within the travel ways or sight lines of pedestrian or vehicular traffic. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, application no. EXC-2009-OS is hereby approved; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based and contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application EXC-2009-05, as set 2-9 Resolution No. EXC-2009-OS August 11, 2009 Page 2 ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of August 11, 2009, and are incorporated by reference herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TIFPT 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on Exhibits titled: at&t/CN3242-A/November Drive/Results Way/Cupertino, California 95014" prepared by Jeffrey Rome & Associates, Inc. dated 07/02/09 and consisting of six sheets labeled T-1, A-0 through A-3, and LS-1, except as may be amended by the conditions contained in this resolution. 2. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a), has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 1 lth day of August 2009, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: Aarti Shrivastava Community Development Director APPROVED: Lisa Giefer, Chair Planning Commission g: /planning/pdreport/res/2009/EXC-2009-OS res. doc 2-10 w ~ .. '~ L~ ~ ~7 ~ ,~ , t >~ ~ . , _~ t~ }y ~ ~ f .,- ~ °'~ .~i '!,.,1. r Mil :1~ lr ~ '"l" ~` ~ ~; ~?: ~ ~ t r,~ . , ~ v i t ^9 ~ 'a . ..r ,~~; , t:;? a - ! ~, ~ ' s { k e ~ X"' +~a;. 1 w ~ ~ ~- . .. '~- * is ~~~~ ~-~« ~.i_ .. "` A ~« ; ~ a ~a1 i k ,i , ,~,« s ~ ~ ; •. ~ a.. ~i ~~j + ~ ~ ~ .. ., . , s a 1 11, ice, t .:...,u r .~ x .BAN. .~~.' ~ ~'1y' ~ "~. ~~'. § !{.K J~r ` a 1 , ~v ~ W rqa~ ~ "~' w ,.t ~ '• 4 .. .tom' ~ +r 'I ' ~ f r ,. 1 ^{ ~ ,~Y h., ~IR ~ ~: r~ , .t ~~'.t _ ~ a ~ ~. ,. , . ~ ~~ c ~ . ~ ~ y, ..~ ~ j , ,~ , :- .. ~ ~ . ,o, ~ .... _.. ... ~.~. ~ it ~ .. _ _ , ~! ,W"1' ~* a f itf~~ ~,; ~ -,b :J, i ,Z.,~ ~ - ~.- +~. .y ... • ,w. ,: ._ . ,.. ,. _ .. • ~ ~ ~ °' '`^~ ~,~, 1 ~ ,, "... ..`! - ~ t M.. s ~,. 3 9~, I + ~ ~...,.,. ..,. .- _...~ sal,,, ,. t ~ , ~ , _ .' ~ ~~.. pit ~~~), , . ' . t Ift 1 liit!{ ~y. ,a r ~ !. ~ k~p tf . t~ir ~, v: Y a, Y ` ~..n - ~ ' _~ . !q ,, ~,, . __ 1~r .a, : w ~ t , .t . ~ ~ . ~,,,,.,.,,,......,«,x ~. ' fi"'~ ~ _ _ „ , K~ae s-~.. „-....._._.... W . A, ~; ~ t ~ ~ ~,,,...,.~ ~ to t „ k .,. ,....,~, ,< ~ ., r t ~, ~~ ~y ,, -.„., .. '4'i ~ / ~,~ ~ .. !` . h.,, ATM. f, ~ tM y;'."Yi. „, w. -, sue. ¢ ~. '~ ~ .. Aux .~Gnr~ a e+:"" w . , ,. .. t 4, ~ Z ~ .? ,. . !Rp"'P"'~"a ~ ~ tax ~ ~ TS ~ !di% ~ X '/ ~ ~yiv ^ ~/ C ~ `' `~ r~. .~ .Y V- 1'~T r ,, ~~ ,~ ~ .. ~- N 4~ F :.R.' '~~, . ,~r 1 ~ 1 f~'. ~ ill ! ~„ y. ... ~ `r. ~~ ,;c~ , ~ .....,x "~ a y A~Y'~i N gj. ~p _ D ~ ~ pi : «,. . (p "., • - '' ~, N'~ ~ ~ '. -. 1 ~ ~. .~ _' ~ , . "''"~ '., Ye a,~ ~. , ~ .. ~ ..,.-~....,-..., t t, ~ tt t V ~- I ~ ~0 ~ ~ q U ~ ~ n 3~ J ...-......_ ~ K I ,. ~ ~ .: m ,<. ~y n ~ r .:. ~. * ~ Y.. a ~! , ~' 4 ~ ,, .. _. ~ . {: ~ l1 '-d j.: •~ a ~i k~ ~ G . ~ .. .. ww.swsauacar -., ~a . ~' ~~,:. '. ~-.,+, .( ~ 1 1 ,w: &„E.'~ .~ ~"L, ' ,..,,. ,n .._ ~ .~... i -. ox. .':W.:;n .;. -• tiy~; ' kt ~.~, s;',' :~ .. .. ...w, y~pMy~wlYM~ , ' ~r ~ _. ,, ~ ~ ~~ ;' ;%~ .yrny.+rr,iw., ~ - 4 :. ti ~ ~ w. rw.c w ~ ~ r^^- .,, , ~ • :1 ° M ~.. .~.. . ~„ - ~ .. .. , a'°~:, ~a :sy-~-r, : r ~ ,~ ~ . -? ~.rirriA. ~ t p, , w~ l~~Y 1::., c , .~., ~ ,, , -~ ~ (~mauon rovided b ro ect a licanc Questions? Call {.877.799.3210 or visit ;, ~'~u~~~~ I ~I~l~ L~ui'. '~ ~.~.~:,~;,,~,;~; i~;~-., ~l~~ i i~il.~ ! ~`~~~ r~~~. Accuracy of this photosimulation based upon in of p y p I pp at&t Report Summary Based upon information provided by AT&T Mobility and the design engineer, and using the calculated method for determining RF field strength, it is the engineer's opinion that the proposed AT&T Mobility site to be located at Results Way, Cupertino, CA, 95014 will comply with the FCC's current prevailing standard for limiting human exposure to RF energy. Due to the mounting method utilized, the general public would not normally be able to approach the antennas. Therefore, no significant impact on the general population is expected. The calculated electromagnetic field strength level in publicly accessible areas is less than the existing standard allows for exposure of unlimited duration. Additionally, due to the mounting method used, no significant impact on the environment is expected. For personnel who work within 11' of the face of an antenna, a training program in exposure to RF fields is recommended. Maintenance personnel should be instructed to contact the appropriate Carrier prior to working in front of an antenna. Recommended Signage A standard blue AT&T Mobility RF "Notice" sign should be posted at the base of the tower. Background Evan Wappel is the Market RF Safety Coordinator for AT&T Mobility and is responsible for conducting a Radio Frequency (RF) electromagnetic analysis for the AT&T Mobility site to be located at Results Way, Cupertino, CA, 95014. This analysis consists of a review of the proposed site conditions, calculation of the estimated RF field strength of the antennas, and the provision of a comparison of the estimated field strength with the Federal Communication Commission (FCC) recommended guidelines for human exposure to RF electromagnetic fields. 2-15 ~, at&t Site Description Based upon the information provided by AT&T Mobility, 12 AT&T Mobility panel antennas will be mounted on a new monopine. The antennas will be mounted approximately 63' (to bottom of antennas) above ground level. The antennas will be oriented such that the main lobes are oriented toward the horizon. Normal public access to the front of the antennas is not expected due to the mounting location and method utilized. Occupational access to the front of the antennas is not normally expected. RF Field Strength Calculation Methodology A generally accepted method is used to calculate the expected RF field strength. The method uses the FCC's recommended equations which predicts field strength on a worst case basis by Egi~atit~il 1 l? - FCT ,S = ~ _ ~f: R= ~(_r' ~~ 1 ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ doubling the predicted field strength. The following equation is used to predict maximum RF field strength: Where: S =power density P =power input to the antenna G =power gain of the antenna in the direction of interest relative to an isotropic radiator R =distance to the center of radiation of the antenna s Reference Federal Communication Commission Office of Engineering Technology Bulletin 65 2-16 at&t The ground level effect of the AT&T Mobility emissions was calculated using a maximum downtilt of 2° and a maximum ERP of 6,447 watts. Results were calculated for a height of 6' above ground level. Using these factors, the maximum calculated AT&T Mobility fields at ground level are 0.099'0 of the existing standard for general population uncontrolled exposure. See Table 1 for the FCC's guidelines on Maximum Permissible Exposure (MPE). Note that the RF ranges referenced for this analysis are the ranges of 300 -1500 Mhz, and 1500 - 100,000Mhz shown in Table 1, which is included in Appendix A. Exposure Environments The FCC guidelines incorporate two separate tiers of exposure limits that are dependent on the situation in which the exposure takes place and/or the status of the individuals who are subject to exposure. The decision as to which tier applies in a given situation should be based on the application of the following definitions. Occupational/controlled exposure limits apply to situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see below), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. General population/uncontrolled exposure limits apply to situations in which the general public may be exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment-related. 2-17 at&t For purposes of applying these definitions, awareness of the potential for RF exposure in a workplace or similar environment can be provided through specific training as part of a RF safety program. Warning signs and labels can also be used to establish such awareness as long as they provide information, in a prominent manner, on risk of potential exposure and instructions on methods to minimize such exposure risk. For example, a sign warning of RF exposure risk and indicating that individuals should not remain in the area for more than a certain period of time could be acceptable. Another important point to remember concerning the FCC's exposure guidelines is that they constitute exposure limits (not emission limits), and they are relevant only to locations that are accessible to workers or members of the public. Such access can be restricted or controlled by appropriate means such as the use of fences, warning signs, etc., as noted above. For the case of occupational/controlled exposure, procedures can be instituted for working in the vicinity of RF sources that will prevent exposures in excess of the guidelines. An example of such procedures would be restricting the time an individual could be near an RF source or requiring that work on or near such sources be performed while the transmitter is turned off or while power is appropriately reduced. Qualifications of Reporting Engineer Mr. Wappel has been involved in the analysis of RF emissions since 1999. He has designed numerous RF systems including both site design and RF system design. He is an Electrical Engineer, and all contents of this report are true and correct to the best of his knowledge. Signed: ~~ Date: 6/11/2009 Evan Wappel, BSc. 2-18 at&t APPENDIX A Term Definitions Exposure Exposure occurs whenever and wherever a person is subjected to electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields other than those originating from physiological processes in the body and other natural phenomena. Exposure, partial-body. Partial-body exposure results when RF fields are substantially nonuniform over the body. Fields that are nonuniform over volumes comparable to the human body may occur due to highly directional sources, standing-waves, re-radiating sources or in the near field. General population/uncontrolled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when the general public is exposed or in which persons who are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be made fully aware of the potential for exposure or cannot exercise control over their exposure. Therefore, members of the general public always fall under this category when exposure is not employment-related. Maximum permissible exposure (MPE). The rms and peak electric and magnetic field strength, their squares, or the plane-wave equivalent power densities associated with these fields to which a person may be exposed without harmful effect and with an acceptable safety factor. Occupational/controlled exposure. For FCC purposes, applies to human exposure to RF fields when persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment and in which those persons who are exposed have been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Occupational/controlled exposure limits also apply where exposure is of a transient nature as a result of incidental passage through a location where exposure levels may be above general population/uncontrolled limits (see definition above), as long as the exposed person has been made fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over his or her exposure by leaving the area or by some other appropriate means. 2-19 ~-~ at&t Table 1 LIMITS FOR MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE EXPOSURE (MPE) (A) Liiuits for OccupationaUControlled Exposure Frequency Elechic Field ~-iaguetic Field Po«er Deusity ~~~eragiu~ Tune Range Strength (E} Sh•eugth (H) (S) (E~', ;H~' or S (NTEIz} (Viiu) (.~,~ui) (iu~V/cui'') (vlinutes) 0.3-3.0 614 1.63 (100)T 6 3.0-30 184'?!f 4.89'f (900/f)'~ G 30-300 61.4 0.163 1.0 6 300-1500 -- -- i'300 6 1500-100.000 -- -- 5 6 (B) Linuts for General Population/L"ncontrolled Exposure Frequency Electric Field ~laguetic Fielcl Po~~~er Density ~ti~eraging Tiiue Rouge Sh•eugth (E) Strength (H) (S} ~E~', 'H~' or S (1~-g3z) (Vri11} (Ar'"iu) (ui~~Vrciu') {uuuntes) 0.3-1.34 G14 1.G3 (100)'' 30 1.34-30 824if 2.19/f (1S0/f')x` 30 30-300 27. ~ 0.073 0.2 30 300-1500 -- -- f`1500 30 1500-100.000 -- -- 1.0 30 f = fiequeucy iu Iv~Iz Plane-~~%ave equiitaleut po«~er cleusity NOTE 1: Occupationol/controlled limits apply in situations in which persons are exposed as a consequence of their employment provided those persons are fully aware of the potential for exposure and can exercise control over their exposure. Limits for occupational/controlled exposure also apply in situations when an individual is transient through a location where occupational/controlled limits apply provided he or she is made aware of the potential for exposure. NOTE 2: General popu/otion/uncontrolled exposures apply in situations in which the general public may be exposed, or in which persons that are exposed as a consequence of their employment may not be fully aware of the potential for exposure or can not exercise control over their exposure. 2-20 Colin Jung Attachment 5 From: Peter Friedland [peterfriedland@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 11:37 PM To: Colin Jung; amgadre@hotmail.com Subject: Re: FW: Revised plans for AT&T treepole near Bubb & McClellan Roads Colin, I strongly support this application. The antenna will be well concealed both by location in the light industrial area and because of the tree pole mounting arrangement. The structure fully meets the federal safety regulations. Moreover, this antenna will go a long way to addressing the single greatest cell phone coverage problem the TICC found in its survey of last year, that of AT&T coverage in the Bubb corridor. Please let me know when this will come before the planning commission as I'd like to attend and provide TICC supporting testimony. Peter At 04:51 PM 7/6/2009, Colin Jung wrote: Again??! ! ! From: Colin Jung Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 12:01 PM To: 'amgadre@hotmail.com'; 'peterfriedland@gmail.com' Subject: Revised plans for AT&T treepole near Bubb & McClellan Roads Here are the revised plans, photosims and RFR study. Colin Jung City of Cupertino i 2-22 CN3242-A NOVEMBER DRIVE RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 SPECIAL INSPECTIONS I CONCRETE 2 BOLTS INSIAUED IN CONCRETE 3 CONCRETE MOMENT-RESISTING SPACE FPANE 4 REINFORCING STEEL AND PRESTRESSING STEEL 5.1 ALL SIRUCNRAL WELDING 5.2 MflD TESIIHG DUCTILE MOMENT-RE515101G STFf1 FlM11E 5.3 WELDING REINFORCNG STEEL 6 HIGH-STRENGTH BDLRNG l SiRUCNRAL MASONRf B RONFORCEO GYPSUM CONCRETE 9 INSULATING CONCRETE FlLL 10 SPRAY-MPUED FlAEPROOFlNG II DEEP FOUNOIRONS (PILING, DRILLED R C.NSSONSJ 12 SHOTCREfE IJ.1 VLAIFY SOIL CONDOIONS NtE SUBSTWRMIIY IN CONFORIJMICE WIM THE SOIL INVESRGARON REPORT I72 VTRIFY THAT FOUNDATION IXGVARONS EXTEND T° PROPER DEPTH PND BEARING SIRAA 133 PROWDE SOIL COMPPLigN ZEST RESULTS, DEPTH OF FlL4 REUTNE DENSRY, BEN2ING VALUES 1].4 PRONDE SOIL IXPANSION TEST RESULTS, IXPANSION NDIX, RECAMMENOA710N5 FOR FOUNDIRONS, ai- GRADE FLOOR SIPS OESGN fOR EACH BUILDING SRE 14 SMOKE CONTROL SYSTEM 15 SPECML CASES (DESCRIBE) 16 OFF-SffE FABRIG110N OF RUIIDING COMPONENTS 17 OTHER SPECPL INSPECRONS AS REOMAED Bf DESIGNER N0. DESCRIPTION OF T1PE OF INSPECRON REQUIRED, LOCA710N, REMARKS. VICINITY MAP MpOee CUPERTINO CONSULTANT TEAM CLIENTS REPRESENTATIVE: ERICSSON INC. 6160 STONERIDGE MALL ROAD SUITE 400 PLEAS4NTON, CALIFORNIA 94588 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: TIN LENCIONI PHONE: (916) 437-9119 BLACK OOT WIRELESS 720 COMMERCE IRVINE, CAUFORNAI 92602 PHONE: (949) 502-3800 FAX (949) 271-7940 SITE ACW6RION Jk ZONING: PHIWP THOMAS PHONE: (925) 330-5749 RF ENGINEER: ARAB UMAR (AT&T) PHONE: (925) 468-8584 ARCHITECT: JEFFREY ROME AND ASSOCMTES 3 SAN JOAOUIN PLAZA SURE: 155 NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNM 92660 PHONE: (102) 324-4338 FAX: (949) 160-3931 CONTACT: ROBIN NELSON LAND SURVEYOR: TIMOTHY SCHAD, L5. 10699 ROUND VALLEY ROAD GRASS VALLEY, CALIFORNM 95949 PHONE: (530) 271-7477 FAX: (530) 271-7377 CONTACT: TIMOTHY SCHAO DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY SHEET INDEX APPLICANT: AT<ET MOBNtt T-1 TIRE SHEET 4420 ROSEWOOD DRNE PLEASAVTON, CALIFORNIA 94568 A-0 SRE PLAN _ A-1 ENLARGED SRE PLAID OWNER: ECI TWO RESULTS LLC. A-2 NORTH d: SOUTH ELEVATIONS 1301 SHOREWAY ROAD; SURE 258 A-3 EAST ELEVATION BELMONT, CrWFORNM 94002 LS-1 SRE SURVEY (FOR REFERENCE ONLY) CONTACT: ANDREW BROWN PHONE: (650) 292-4100 OTHER ON-SRE TELECOM PICTURES: NONE PROJECT ADDRESS: RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER: J57-20-046 UTRUDE: 3T 19' 08.58' N LONGITUDE: 122' 03' °9.63' W LAT/LONG TYPE: NAD-83 EXISTING ZONING: P (ML) PROPOSED PROTECT AREA: 935 50. R. PROPOSED ttPE OF CONSTRUCTION: TYPE V-8 PROPOSED OCCUPANCY: U EXISTING TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: NOT APPLICABLE EXtSRNG OCCUPANCY: NOT ACCPLJCPBLE JDRIBDIDTIDN: Dltt DF GDPERT,ND APPLICABLE CODES COUNTY: S4FITA CLAPA ALL WORN SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING APPIJCABLE CODES: PROJECT DESCRIPTION AT&T MOBIUtt PROPOSES TO CONSTRUCT, OPERATE ANO MAINTAIN AN UNMANNED WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS FACIUtt. THIS FACILITY WILL CONSIST OF THE FOLLOWING: • INSTALL A PROPOSED MONOPINE WRH (6) PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS AND (6) FURIRE ANTENNAS WTHIN THE PROPOSED EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE • INSTALL (24) RUNS OF 7/8'e COA%IAL CABLE AND (12) TMA'S. • INSTALL ATBT OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS MOUNTED ON A CONCRETE PAO WITHIN A CMU RETAINING WgLL ENCLOSURE. • UNDERGROUND URUtt RUNS FOR ELECTRICAL AND TELEPHONE. LEGAL DESCRIPTION PENDING RECEIPT OF TRLE REPORT. CAUFORNM BUILDING CODE, 200] EOIDON, BASED ON THE 2008 INIEAN4RONAL BUILDING CODE CAllFORNM FlRE CODE, 2007 EDITION, BASED ON 1HE 2008 INTERNARONAL FlRE CODE, CAUFORNU MECHANICAL CODE, 2001 EDDION, BASED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM MECHWICAL CODE CALFORNM PLUMBNG CODE, 2001 EDIRDN, BASED ON THE 2006 UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE CNIFORNM EIFCTRICAI CODE, 2007 EDIAON, BASED ON THE 2005 NARONPL ELECTRICAL CODE CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE, 2007 EDITION. IN 7HE EVENT OF CONFLICT, THE MOST RESTRICTNE CODE SHALL PREVAIL ACCESSIBILITY DISCLAIMER THIS PROJECT IS AN UNOCCUPIED WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICARONS FACILITY' IS EXEMPT FROM DIS4BLED ACCESS REQUIREMENTS. SCALE THE DRAWING SCALES SHOWN IN THIS SET REPRESENT THE CORRECT SCALE ONLY WHEN THESE DRAWINGS ARE PRINTED IN A 24'X36' FORMAT. IF THIS DRAWING SET IS NOT 24'%36', THIS SET IS NOT TO SCALE. J RA Jefirry Rana A AaeDCialee, Inc, AmhlMehn k TdeasmmunkaHone 3 San Joaquin Plaxa, SuNe 155 NewpoH Beaoh, Ca111omIa 92660 Phone; (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 780-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTNNED IN PHIS SET DF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMEMS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBRED. $TAIAP ~cj0 ARC7J~ V fCT i * C-010876 A do s~ FfB. 28. ag 4~f W CAU~@ PREPMEO FOR 4420 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, Califarnio 94568 APPROVALS R.f. ENGINEER DATE SRE AGO. & 20NING DATE ERICSSON CM GATE ATkT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL GATE PRWECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242-A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 SANTA CLARA COUNTY DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZD REVIEW (P1) as/oB/OS DESIGN CHANGE (P2) m/oz/os FINAL m's (P3) SHEET TITLE TITLE SHEET m 0 0 0 m J z 0 i a SITE PLAN KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED ATkT ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED MONOPINE WfMIN A PROPOSED ATdT EOUIPMEM ENCLOSURE; SEE SHEEP A-1. 2 PROPOSED ATkT 22'-0" % 42'-6° LEASE AREA WITH OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT WITHIN A 6'-0' HIGH CMU RETAINING WALL ENCLOSURE TO MATCH EXISTNG; SEE SHEET A-1, 3 E%ISDNG PAD MOUNTED POWER TRANSFORMER AND PROPOSED ATki POWER SOURCE. 4 EXISTING URLffY POLE d PROPOSED ATdT TElCO POC. PROPOSED 5'-0' WIDE ATdT UNDERGROUND POWER CONDUIT ROUTE DISTANCE 80'-0°f. PROPOSED 5'-0' WIDE ATdT UNDERGROUND TELCD CONDUR ROUTE. DISTANCE 450'-0°f. FUTURE DEVELOPMENT ACCESS DRIVEWAY AND PROPOSED 12'-0' WIDE ACCESS ROUTE ~6T NORTH WEST SOU1H WEST (ANTENNA COAXIAL CABLE SCHEDULE( Z 1. COMRACTOR i0 PROVIDE ALL LABOR TO INSTALL 24 RUNS OF COAX, 12 TMA'S ANO 6 ANIENN4S. 2. ERICSSON TO PROVIDE ALL COAX, CONNECTORS, ANCILLARY EQUIPMENT (INCLUDING WEATHER STRIPPING, GROUND KITS, ETC.). 3. CONTRACTOR TO COLOR CODE ALL COAx. COLORED BANDS OF TAPE ON COA% IDENTIFY SECTOR, FREQUENCY, TECHNOLOGY, AND TRANSMR CROUP AS FOLLOWS: ~' ~ 8 FUNRE DEVELOPMENT ASPHALT PAVED PARKING. ~ i i , / G~'- ~ ` ~ ~ ~, ..~ (UNDER SEPARATE DEVELOPMENT). ., '~..~ ', y ~ "~% w+r 9 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT BUILDINGS. _ i ~ i -; j /;%` ~ ~~ j~ti (UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT). ~ i f - "", ~ / ~/ ". r "~ •/ BIOSWAL£ j ~ I'.'~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F_.. _ ~, 10 IXISTINC BUILDINGS ON PROPERtt. ' ~~ / {'tFP) 0-. /-~~ ~ ` ~r / / ~~ ~ i~ ~ / '; ~, r i -~~ ~ ~ i / / !' ~~~ ~ ,- ~ / _ _./ / ix k 11 IXISDNC PROPERtt LINE. ~ / .,. , ~ ~i... -- ~x i i ' i/ - 12 PROPOSED TELCO PUILBOX 0 EVERY 300'-0" GF'-~ , ~ i ~ i ~ ~~/ '~ ~~~ ~ ~, ~ ~ /~~~ ~~: ..,.. P~ " ~ i ! ~ ~A,~,"~ 5 ~ / , / i ~ 6 AS ~ r =' FF 33 ~> i i ~' / -= 9 i ~ s I _ ~~ i i ~j~ :11,1'~I ( ~ ~i~ i ~ r ~~"~Y i -~ ~ i' i i _. , `w i "i , ', ` ~ 1, ~~~ ~ ' ~_ / ' ~. i, ~1~'~1' lE1 9, '"~'' ,s.,~. i~ / ~ i, ~1 ~ ~ i i < ~OSW / i ~-'.. 1 ~ ~ x / / it ' (~') ~ ~ ~,Y ~ ~ , l.,-' t 1 I) -~ 3345 /~~ ~~ ., ... ; _ ,. t , ~ U' ~ ~ , ~ ,~. rr r -- .... .= l; -l i_ ~, l _ ) ~. `' i _ ~ ~ i:. :.. l 1, , '1 `, 1 ' Sri! .~ ~ Na 3s5s r~ ^i' - -~ _ - ~- _ .. -._ ~ .- ,x ~ ~ , - • r i i i /: ~- -- p0 - ~~ ~- Q ' ~ " 9 ~~ ~ j 111 '1 n~ 1 r I ~ ,,r . 11 ,. , __._. I ;. ~ - '~ II BIOSWALE (TYP)~~ ~ ~ ~ ..__ I SE~rO M ll >> 267'-4' ~ Il II F I I 11 I ,. ~.f ^ __. _..... .. H F' i~~ I' __.. ~. ~ ', APN: 357-20-046 _il , ', ZONING: P(ML) '': j rENf BIALDNG C 9 0( - :. r': 1: _.. FFE 336 4~fi, PAD 335 ~ ~~~ ' '~ nN r N ~ ~~G 1p~0 L, ; oas c Lo u E I i ~ ; ~ ..~:-- I - , 1-. -T- ~- --,m+- -------------- d-'~ -- - I mi r i 2 )( 1 N m Np rnA O (p 5 J 11 (~ .. - - ., I ..... BIA.DlIG 4 1D h ai_-.- .__-.r,,. P r r--? -. n { - .. NOTE: FUTURE DEVELOPMENT SHOWN TO CLARIFY ACCESS ROUTE AND UTILRY ROUTING FOR PROPOSED ATdcT SITE. ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THIS DRAWING OTHER THAN REFFERING TO AT&T IS UNDER SEPARATE PERMIT. N SECTOR "A° CSM 1900 Tx 1/Rx 1 T% 3 TX 2/R% 2 TX 4 Tx 5 IX 6 q BROWN 2BRWN/1RED 2 ORANGE 20RG/1RED 28RWN/2RED 20RG/2RED CSM 850 T% 1/Rx 1 T% 3 TX 2/RX 2 TX 4 T% 5 TX 6 3 BROWN 3RRWN/1RED 3 ORANGE JORG/1RED 3RRWN/2RED 30RG/2RED UMTS 1900 rx 1/Rx 1 Tz 2/Rx 2 4 BROWN 4 ORANGE UMT'S 850 IX 1/RX 1 TX 2/R% 2 5 BROWN 5 ORANGE SECTOR "B" CSM 1900 IX 1/RX 1 T% 3 iX 2/RX 2 TX 4 T% 5 T% fi 2 YELLOW 2YEL/1 RED 2 BLUE 28LUE/1AED 2YEL/2RED 28LUE/2RED GSM 850 Tz 1/R% 1 T% 3 TX 2/R% 2 T% 4 T% 5 TX fi J YELLOW 3YEL/1 RFD J BLUE 3BLUE/(RED 3YE1/2RED JBWE/2RED T Tx 1/Rx 1 Tx z/RZ 2 UM S 1900 4 YELLOW 4 BLUE UMTS 850 T% 1/RR 1 TX 2/RX 2 - 5 YELLOW 5 BLUE SECTOR 'C' GSM 1900 T% 1/R% 1 TX 3 TX 2/Rx 2 TX 4 T% 5 T% fi 2 VIOLET 2ND/1 RED 2 WHITE 2WM/IRm 2N0/2RED 2WM/2RED GSM 850 T% 1/R% 1 TX 3 T% 2/RX 2 TX 4 T% 5 T% fi J NOLEf JNO/1 RED 3 WHITE 3WM/(RED SNO/2RED 3WM/2RED T% 1/R% 1 TX 2/R% 2 UMTS 1900 4 NOLET 4 WHITE MT T% 1/R% 1 TX 2/RX 2 U S 850 5 VIOLET 5 WHRE 4. WHEN ANTENNA LINES ARE DIPLE%ED, THE COLOR CODE OF THE HIGHEST FREQUENCY PREVAILS (LE. UM6 DIPLIXED WITH TOMA SHOULD HAVE COLOR 4 BANDS). 5. A1L ANTENNAS AND ANTENNA CABLE SHALL BE FURNISHED BY ERICSSON INC. AND INSTALLED BY ANTENNA INSTALLATION COMRACTOR. fi. PRIOR TD PLACEMENT OF ANTENNA POLE MOUNTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT THE AZIMUTH AND DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS MATCH ACTUAL FlELD CONDIDONS. ALLOWABLE TOLERANCE; HORIZOMAL ALICNMEM = t5'; VERTICAL ALIGNMENT = t1'. 7. ANTENNA INSTALLATION CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONDUR, CABLE TRAY, GROUNDS, ETC. FOR COMPLETE INSTALLATION OF ANTENNAS AND CABLES SHOWN AND (MENDED AS REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETE OPERATING SYSTEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH ERICSSON INC. STANDARDS. B. IN NO CASE SHALL THERE BE ANY MORE THAN TWO (2) 90' NRNS (OR EQUIVALENT) IN ANY CONDNUOUS LENGTH OF CONDUIT BETWEEN PULL BO%ES OR SIMIIM FEATURES. 9. ANTENNA CONDUIT SHALL ONLY INCLUDE FACTORY-MADE LARGE RADIUS SWEEPS AT ALL CHANGES IN DIRECDON. SWEEP RADIUS SHALL BE 18" MINIMUM ABOVE GROUND AND 36' MINIMUM BELOW GROUND. 10. CONDUR SHW.L BE 3"0 MINIMUM. ALL UNDERGROUND CONDUff SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. ALL EXPOSED CONDUIT ABOVE GRADE LEVEL SHALL BE IMC OR RIGID GALVANIZED. ALL E%POSED CONDUD PROTECTED IN A BUILDING OR ON A ROOF SHALL BE EMT OR W STABILIZED PAINTED SCHEDULE 80 PVC. 11. IN HIGH TRAFFC AREAS OR WHERE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DAMAGE CONTRACTOR SHALL PRDNDE FORMED GRIP STRUT COVER OVER COA%IAL CABLE ROUTES. WHERE CABLE IS RUN ON THE WALL, ATTACH UNISTRUT TO WALL AND COVER WITH 14 GA GALVANIZED FORMED SHEET METAL COVER OR MATERIAL AS DIRECTED BY ERICSSON INC. CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. 12. VERIFY ROUTE AND LENGTH OF CABLE PRIOR TO CUTDNG. ADJUST INDICATED ROUTE AS REQUIRED TO CLEAR (E) EOUIPMEM AT FACILRIES. 13. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 7/8" COAX CABLE SHALL BE 140'-0". MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-1/4" COAX CARLE SHALL BE 190'-0°. MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1-5/8° COAX CABLE SHALL BE 235'-0". 14. VERIFY MODEL NUMBERS OF ANTENNAS WITH ERICSSON INC. SERVICES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVDE TESTING OF ANTENNAS AND SHALL PROVDE DOCUMENTATION TO THE ERICSSON INC. PROJECT MANAGER. 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ALL TORQUE TOLERANCES PER THE MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. l SITE PLAN _ ~.`"" o• ~ ' 13 I GENERAL ANTENNA & CABLE NOTES J RA Jdfrry Rome Jt Aseoctahs, Inc, AnhlMclun d TdeeommunlcaNons 3 San Jaayuin Plo:a, SuBe 155 IMwpoH Bwch, Callfomh 92660 Phonr. (9!9) T60-3929 Fa K: 9!9 760-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTANED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTON DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. STAMP f~0 APoDyA ~~~~ * C-OPC616 ^ R A o RB CNti T s~rY a cAL~F°~~ PREPARED FOR 4420 Rosewood Drive Pleasontan, Cahfomia 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SIZE ACQ. d ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE ATAT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242-A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 95014 SAMA CLAAA COUNtt DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ID RENEW (P1) 06/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) 07/02/09 FlNAL ZD'S (P3) SHEEF DTLE SITE PLAN m 0 0 0 w F Z u o a ENLARGED SITE PLAN KEYNOTES i NOTE: ANTENNAS ANO SUPPORT ARMS TO BE 22'-0" ~ I I I PAINTED GREEN TO MATCH MONOPINE NEEDLES. AT&T LEASEAREA~ I~ I cQ 1 PROPOSED AT&T ANTENNAS MOUFlTED ON A PROPOSED MONOPINE. + SEE DE~fNLTO RAVE NEEDLE COVERS O4ER PROPOSED ANTENNAS; ci nnr ._, .-• I - I ~. / I h0 O I V ~ 2 PROPOSED (21 ATQT OUTL100R EQUIPMENT CARINETS MOUNTED ~~ ON A CONCRETE PAD. I MONOPOLE FOUNDATION. 3 FUTURE (3) ATkT EQUIPMENT CABINETS. I 4 PROPOSED ATkT GPS MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CABINET. ~ TMA -TYPICAL (2) PEF I SECTOR. 5 PROPOSED (J) RRU22-OB40 UNRS (1 PER SECTDR, 3 SECTORS I 17 . MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED H-FRAME U-LITY RACK. PROPOSED (J) RRU22-1940 MOUNTED BELOW RRU22-0840'S. ~ 6 PROPOSED ARGUS CABINET TO BE MOUNTEp ON PROPOSED CONCRETE PPD. f I 7 FUTURE ARGUS CABINET. I PANEL ANTENNA - TYPIi I Q (2) PER SECTOR. 8 PROPOSED ATdcT RBS-3416 MOUNTED WITHIN I ~ PROPOSED ARGUS CABINET. I O ' S~ 9 FUTURE RBS-3418 MOUNTED WITHIN FUTURE I I U ry ~SE~NOR,„B" SOT ARGUS CABINET. ~ I ~ ~ 6u ~ 0 N 10 PROPOSED ATkT HORIZOMAL COAXWL CABLE RUN I 0., MOUNTED TO WALL. 16 11 PROPOSED TECH UCHi MOUNTED ON H-FRAME UTIUIY RACK. I ~ I SCALE. 12 PROPOSED SWITCH FOR TECH LIGHT TO BE ANTENNA PLAN VIEW MouNTED To cLlu wALL. I t/4"=1'-0" 0 2' 4' 13 PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH CMU RETAINING WALL ~~ TO MATCH EXISTING IN COLOR AND STYLE. I I I 14 PROPOSED 4'-0" WIDE SINGLE METAL TUBE ) I ACCESS LATE. I 15 PROPOSED ATkT 5'-0" WIDE UNDERGROUND POWER ~ I CONDOR ROUTE. DISTANCE 85 -0"f. I I , 16 PROPOSED ATkT 5'-0" WIDE UNDERGROUND TELCO I I - CONDUff ROUTE. DISTANCE 370'-04. I _ ~ I 17 IXISTING ASPHALT PAVED PARKING. I - I 20 18 IXIS-NG TOE OF THE SLOPE. I O ~ I ~ 19 IXISIINC TREE TO RFJAAIN. ~ ~ ~ I ~~'_ I a~ 20 EXISTING PARKING LOT CURBING. CURBING TO BE REMOVED 1N FUNRE DEVELOPMEM. I , I a 21 IXISIINC PROPERTY ONE. ~ ~ ~ I ; ~ I I l7 22 FUTURE CURB LGCATION. I I ~ ~ _.. ( I, l , I „B" I I SEO10R L, _I 0 ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ „I II I ~ (nC ~ ~ 'o ~ ~~ Jz0" -. II ~' - J I ~ i N I -7 I I I ~ I 15 21 19 I I I I III I • ~ ~i , ENLARGED SITE PLAN SALE: J RA Jeifrrf Aome k Aseockla, Inc. An:hReelun R Tdeeommunka8one 3 San Jaaquln Plaza, SuNe 155 Newport Beach, Cdlfomla 92660 Phone: (949) 160-3929 Fax: (949) 180-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORLIATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SEi OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBfTED. STAMP ~~cjD pNiyf v V B~f4 * n C-020B]fi A a fJ FE6 18~ ~5 +rE ~ ~L~s~ PREPARED FOR 4420 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, Califoma 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SIZE AGO. g ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE ATd<T CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMDER CN3242-A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CAUFDRNIA 95014 SAMA CLARA COUNTY DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZD REVIEW (P1) 06/08/09 DESIGN CHANCE (P2) 07/02/09 FINAL ZD'S (PJ) SHEET TRLE ENLARGED SITE PLAN A-1 ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED ATdtT ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED MONOPINE. ANTENN4 TO HAVE PINE NEEDLES COVERS DYER EACH ANTENNA 2 PROPOSED AT~T MONOPINE WITH FULL BARK CIADDINC. BOTTOM OF PINE BRANCHES TO START AT 25'-0" A&L 3 PROPOSED fi'-0" HIGH CMU RETAINING EOUIPMEM ENCLOSURE. 4 PROPOSED ATkT CPS MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CABINET. 5 E%IS11NG SLOPE W/ UNDSCAPING. 6 EXISTING TREE. PROTECT IN PUCE. 1 FUTURE OTHER CARRIER ANTENNAS. TOP aF (N) AT&T MDNOPINE. 74.0 0 A.G.L . ~ ~ ~ 1' .v" t, h. y ~~ r ~ " ~ 'V s ti~° ~ ~. TOP DF (N) ATkT ANTENNAS, ~.,u ~ ~, ; s7. o6 Ac.L. CENTER OF (NJ ATkT ANTENNAS, a-- '~ - - - - - 65.00 A.C.L. T 1 ,J ~~', ~ ., t ob, ,Y I I ~I~ 4 w~ ~d I I I a, a h .f~,v ~~~ ` i ~~ r-~ ~ 7 .~I I I xc. ~ ~ I I, r '. v4-A _ N a fi+~ r W ~ 4- ''~~ '1 a, , ~~ ~~ v ~~9.n A'~ ~ +~ f1 .1„y"f.ly, lr ?1.I Y~ y / t Y ~ ~,yr <,~ , r p ~i f 2 I a n Y J 'irvy i wl.". ~, ~ y y ~ ' 4 I :- L ' ~ n o I y, r ,~. , '_ r 7.. ~ .g y,,. ~ la BOTTOM OF (N) MONOPINE NEEDLES. , ;P, 7 , 25.00 A.G.L. .. ~ ~ <~F'^9, I~ r4r~ { CT .~ , n, fi ' W~ . .. - y. I ,( u1 ~ f T ~. . ~ ~ r:i. =% TOP OF (N) CMU ENCLOSURE. ~p ,i 4 6.00 A.G.L. o e i 3 tN' TOP OF F.S. --- -- i -- J ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED AT4T ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED MONOPINE. ANTENNA TO HAVE PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENN4 2 PROPOSED AT§T MONOPINE WITH FULL BARK CUDDING. BOTTOM OF PINE BRANCHES TO START AT 25'-0" AGL 3 PROPOSED 6'-0" HIGH CMU RETNNINC EQUIPMEM ENCLOSURE. 4 PROPOSED AT4T GPS MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CABINET. 5 EXISTING SLOPE W/ LANDSCAPING. 6 EXISTING TREE. PROTECT IN PUCE. 7 FUTURE OTHER CARRIER ANTENNAS. W' ; ~ti {~,~ {(~~, t, ..,;~ _.~ ;54t ,,. i#n :all4' ~n f r. V ~ ~+' y~e,. a~..., w" _ ~fi ~. ~' ~~ ~u _i W, t I~+ ~ ` r'f . ~ I~ r] - A %'~ ~ ~1 I t` I ] ~ L_y I i 1 ~~'~w 7 f _e roil _ ~_, I , .~J I I T ,." I I~ I 1-, ~]` y Lh ~ IfJ' : ~` "V,P ~~. _ ~,I,~~y rt-~_~` ~~, ~_~- A.o ~ ._ ICI ~~ `y,lv ~t I ~ ~ Ivsy1 ,. ~u v~ ~ ~n 2 ~ .Y ~ ~. ~.W . 15 D q y ~~ R a -8 ~.I. ~ ~. /~ ~~'~ /z', r ~~;~ ~~ ;~, , n ~' 'S ~ (~ ~ BOTTOM OF (, , .5:. _ ,. ~~'~' )¢ 8 ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~Y~' ~> ;i' y ~. ~:~, . ~" ?i. k'' ^? ~~ y4 /~ ~k. i i TOP OF (N) ATBT MONOPINE. 14.00 AG.L. TOP DF (N) AT&T AMENNAS. 67.08 A.G.L. CEMER OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. fi5.00 A.G.L. 0 I a o m m MONOPINE NEEDLES. 25.00 AG.L 0 I N TOP OF (N) CMU ENCLOSURE. 6.00 AG.L. 0 m 00.00 ~ SOUTH ELEVATION ~"" ~ NORTH ELEVATION ~-~ 12 I~ I ~ J J/18'.1'-0' 0 3" 8 3/18'1'-0' 0 3' 6' J RA ATffrry R91rH k A9sociala, Inc. Arthttxluro R TelecammunkaHone 3 San Joagdn Pkza, Sulh 155 Newpod Beach, Cdlfomlo 92660 Phone: (949) 760-3929 Fax: (949) 160-3931 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILITY IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. STAMP ~~U~~D Alf V I Rq~ or * C-010B1fi k A do Jrgr FfB. 1B. ~e f Ci CAUL PREPARED FOR 4420 Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, California 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE sITE ACQ. ~ zoNlNC DATE ERICSSON CM DATE ATdrT CM PATE OWNER APPROVAL GATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242-A RESULTS WAY CUPERTINO, CALFORNIA 95014 SAMA CURA COUNtt DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZO REVIEW (P1) Ofi/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) 07/02/09 FlNAL ZD'S (P3) SHEET TITLE NORTH & SOUTH ELEVATIONS ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1 PROPOSED ATBT ANTENNAS MOUNTED ON A PROPOSED MONOPINE. ` ANTENNA TO HAVE PINE NEEDLES COVERS OVER EACH ANTENNA 2 PROPOSED AT&T MONOPINE WfTH FULL BARK CLADDING. BOTTOM OF PINE DRANCHES TO START AT 25'-0" 0.C.L J PROPOSED fi'-0" RICH CMU RETANINC EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE. 4 PROPOSED ATd:T GPS MOUNTED TO EQUIPMENT CABINET. 5 IXISIING SLOPE W/ IANOSCAPING. fi IXISTING TREE. PROTECT IN PLACE. 7 FUNRE OTHER CARRIER ANTENNAS. 8 PROPOSED 4'-0" WIDE METAL TUBE ACCESS GATE. ,~;~n; p +j;~ C - ~" 4~ s~ .' / :: b'.. G3Ftit. i ~r. „--- :a~ ~,. t~_- ,~ Y- - dR ~F °u ~~ - r it :y,. , 4* " n+' ~ I~'`' ~' ~~- ItiL~` `?~Iti L' ,J~'~', I h te* ; i~ ~I , 7 ~ 1 ,.,~' I I I ~v, ~ U ` # ~. : ~I' , '~' ` ~ 9 G j ,~ d} Y l:. ;1 ~.QS~.,c ,i~t.~~ ,u~yL_J -,~ L_~ I. 7 :. ~_ ~ - ~~ ~ . i -1' I s.~~ I ~_~x ~~I+f I Iw=~' x~ " ~ _ ~: .~ ~ W z ~.T ~~_ K >~ ~ tird j~' '~ ~~ i. &~~. TOP OF (N) ATBT MONOPINE. 74.00 aG.L. TOP OF (N) ATkT ANTENNAS. 67.06 A.C.L. CENTER OF (N) AT&T ANTENNAS. J A b I °n .~ ,I I ~ e b BOTTOM OF (N) MONOPINE NEEOIES. 0 N TOP OF (N) CMU ENCLOSURE. 6.00 0.C.L 0 m ac.L SCALE: EAST ELEVATION 3„6.=,,_o a~• 1 JRA Jeffrey Rome d Afiaadafes, Inc, Archheeluro k ielwommunleanone 3 San Joequln Plaza, SuNe 155 Newpod Beach, CaBlomla 92fi60 Phone: 949 760-3929 Faz: 9a9 760-3951 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS IS PROPRIETARY BY NATURE. ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN THAT WHICH RELATES TO AT&T MOBILItt IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. STAMP ~~ A~YT .)~ V Rn, fir # C-0208]6 a o ,~ FCB. 28ti rg qJC A' CAUf~ PREPARED FOR aa2o Rosewood Drive Pleasanton, Califamia 94588 APPROVALS R.F. ENGINEER DATE SffE AGO. k ZONING DATE ERICSSON CM DATE ATkT CM DATE OWNER APPROVAL DATE PROJECT NAME NOVEMBER DRIVE PROJECT NUMBER CN3242-A RESUUS WAY CUPERDNO, CALIFORNIA 95014 SANTA CIARA COUNTY DRAWING DATES 02/10/09 PRELIMINARY ZD REVIEW (P1) 06/08/09 DESIGN CHANGE (P2) 07/02/09 FlNAL ZO'S (P~) SHEET TITLE EAST ELEVATION 0 z 0 SITE TOPOGRAPHY ~ •=zo' J2LU`7C J1ZJ67C Q 8• 328167C d • ORNAMENTAL 4' ORNdNIENTAI 0 4' GRNNNENIAL Q 6• 4" ORNAMENTAL Q J177r7C 4' ORN4NRV(AL Q 4' O.RNMIEM Q J2785TC e' I 318. f 17C J28.06'TC J2B.117C 8• d' QRNAMEMAL 4 PKG t,i. I' ORNINIENT Q 4. ORN9MEM Q 328.8'FC ~ 378.477C 4' ORNAMfM °~'~ J28.197C Q 318.J07C J28.187 Q 4' CRNAMENIAL PKG 4r J28.19 Q 4' ORNAMENTAL IikT LEASE d, NNN Q HC=17+/- d' aRN. PROPOSED MaHOPoIE Q T = JT 19~ OB.58' N ON = f2? 0.i' 09.6J' W JJS.JFC ND t1EV. = J29.0' NAVDBB 6' RD ~7 ,,,, ~ J29.107C / ~7C 318.987C J29.GiiC 6, J19.967C 3310FC JJ0.667C 310.TFC E7SSLING BUNDNlC 6' ROOF llNf fL=J66.I'+/- SURVEYNOTES 1,4 ACCURACYCERTIFlCATION 1. ALL UTINDESAND LCWG/l WESARENAD B,~ ALL ELEYAiIONSARENAVDBB (UNLESS NOTED OT HERWISEJ. 2. All BCl/NfWRYINFORAlA710/4SllOWNHEREONHASBfEN ('OMPICEDFRC4ARECORO LUTA SUFPICIENTMONUMENTATIdJWASN01 RECOVEREOWTNEF/ELD r0 ADEq/ATELYLOCATETHEPARCEL BWNLURY. WIIHADOITIONAL FIELD SURVEYING ANO DOCl1MENT RESEARCH 7NE BOUT JDARY SHOWN FIEREON NUYCJWVGE. 3. DAlEOFFIELDSURVEYFEB 9, 2709 4. NOPRELIMINARY77rLEREPORTNASBEENPROVl0E0, ANYEASEMFNiSOR01NER TRCERELAIED ISSUES NOT NNLYUDEOINSAID REPORTWHICLLAREPARTOP 1flE rRLE PROCESSMArORMAYNOTNAVEBEENAOORESSEO, TNWDINYF. SCHAO, LS. ACCEP/SNO RESPoNSIBRUYORLWBNJTYFORBWNOARYOR711LEIiEAIS ADORESSEONEREON. TILIS/SNOTABIX/NDARYSURVEY. LEl,A1 DESCRlPT10N MIEOfSURVEY. PEBlrUARY9, 1009 SRENUMBER~ CN3201.1 NAME NOVEMBERORIVE 17PE PRCFOSFDAKN70PNLE SIIEAOORfSS 1 RESUYTSWAY CUPERDNO, CA %014 /, IMN)1NYSCNAO, Iff~YCCitTIFYTNEGE0DE1i0000R011C4TESAl IHECFN/FROF 7NE PROPOAED Al0. W PMF /OBE: UTIIUDE~ 37'I9CY.6B'N(N46SJ1 LLOYGIRIDE~ 112090A6TW(AWOdS) umuDe ST 19'LH79'Nn1467// LDNGRwe nzor6slrwfNAo-z>) ANDFUR111ERCERIIFYriver INEQEYARONSHEREONAREABOYENf6WSEALEVa (NA W EB, AAO AREAS (IXLDWB: GROUxoaEVarroN 9zaBfrruvtMe ry.aAGtl rGPDFSrRUCnraEiPRGPOSEDy PeuowG OVl•RAU. NE~ONroFSrRUCn1REiPRQ^asEOk PENaNc PARENTPARCEL APN'JS7~BF016 LEASEPARCEL PENDING 1NCRESS/EGRESS6 UTILITIES r0GE7NERWiM7NERIGNrS~RM,RFSSIhDECRESSBEiIYEEN 1NER7EYtt1USLYDESCRNE7lE4SE PARCaANG IHEPI~LC'RM.NrOFWAYAN0INERlGYf roLYSTAii ANOMAwiAMUR(ITIESNECESSAPY FGR nLEGVERARCNa~ ri+EFACnnr rosElNSrAIIED wnrnN rREPREVwusLrDESCRrsfnLEnsE vARCEt lNEACCURACYSTMY)MOSFORTH/SCERRRGI rIW/AREAS fOD.OWS GEOOERCCCOROINAIES ~F RFlEEN(IS)FEfTQ'140A9J EIEYAlIONS ~atrwEEt,JFEEryxAVDa6J ry R i N61CNE11C NORM J17787C J28.J77C 0 JOIM PO(f J27.097C J1B.677C PKG. ``l. ,~'# Q 316.557 Q ORN. 4. ORHAIIINfA d 4' 0.9Y. d f' CRN. II,,,, ~1 A '~ mQ 0 ~, Lnj~ Q ~ ~QVo a~ V N ~ m Z~ VW J ~ JZ~"~ ~~~•. W~Q~ , 0 2 ~~~Q j? Q U r r^^ v! 5ffE'F 1111E SIIF S(/RI~fY LS-1 1 OVERALL PARCEL ISSUE STATUS ~• 100' 1 = 1 N 1 1 ; ,,~ $ ~s ~,~ 11MO1HY SCHAD, LS. 1;~ 10699 ROUND VALLEY RD. Air LFAff , 95949 D ~ (s,TOj sn-~4n FAZ (530) sn-pan 1 AIALnWE71C ~ NORTN ~S~oyb INNN ,~~ ~°~ 'O F. 1S 60'L1 ENp J/11/09 ~'rF ~ uU~o~~ PROPERi'Y UNE - FLOW C/IIE - ra- ra- IEIEPNONE UNE - E - E E1EC7RIC LRff - Eit- E1T- - x - y £IFCiRIC ANO rElEPNONE LINES >4S fEhDE FlRE HFDPANT ~ CUY NORf SIREtT SIGN }S SIREE7 UOOIf D4 NN7ER YN.YE FS fiMSN SURFACE fL ftOW LNNE Cr ORKAIW. GROUND IC rDP OF CURB BFC BOllDM FACE OF CURB TW TOP C4' WAG. BW BOiIDM OF NMLL IBW TOP BICI( OF WA(N © GROUND WEll C/L Cf/RERIlNE • BO!lARD 0 ~idr VICINITY MAP (N.T.S.)