PC 2-25-2025 Searchable PacketCITY OF CUPERTINO
PLANNING COMMISSION
AGENDA
10350 Torre Avenue, Council Chamber and via Teleconference
Teleconference Location Pursuant to Government Code section 54953(b)(2);
C-174 Anand Vihar, Delhi, Delhi 110092
Tuesday, February 25, 2025
6:45 PM
IN-PERSON AND TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION
Members of the public wishing to observe the meeting may do so in one of the following
ways:
1) Attend in person at Cupertino Community Hall, 10350 Torre Avenue.
2) Tune to Comcast Channel 26 and AT&T U-Verse Channel 99 on your TV.
3) The meeting will also be streamed live at www.Cupertino.org/youtube and
www.Cupertino.org/webcast
Members of the public wishing to comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the
following ways:
1) Appear in person at Cupertino Community Hall. Members of the audience who address
the Commission must come to the lectern/microphone, and are requested to complete a
Speaker Card and identify themselves. Completion of Speaker Cards and identifying
yourself is voluntary and not required to attend the meeting or provide comments.
2) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, February 25 to the Commission at
planningcommission@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the
commission members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the
meeting.
Members of the public may provide oral public comments in person during the meeting as
follows:
Comments may be made during “Oral Communications” for matters not on the agenda, and
during the public comment period for each agenda item. If you wish to provide oral
communications, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the
Commission and deliver it to staff prior to discussion of the item. When you are called,
proceed to the podium and the Chair will recognize you. Members of the public that wish
Page 1
1
PC 2-25-2025
1 of 106
Planning Commission Agenda February 25, 2025
to share a document when providing oral comments may do so at the overhead projector at
the podium or email the document to planningcommission@cupertino.gov by 5:00p.m.
Documents received by email will be posted to the City website after the meeting. Please
limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less.
Teleconferencing Instructions
To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the
meeting:
Online:
Register in advance for this webinar:
https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_z5imASvVRV2N5hEajDL-Gg
Phone Dial: 669-900-6833 and enter WEBINAR ID: 945 6787 0262 (Type *9 to raise hand to
speak, *6 to unmute yourself). Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four
digits of their phone number.
Or an H.323/SIP room system:
H.323:
144.195.19.161 (US West)
206.247.11.121 (US East)
Meeting ID: 945 6787 0262
SIP: 94567870262@zoomcrc.com
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about
joining the webinar.
Please read the following instructions carefully:
1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your
internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and
up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain
functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Page 2
2
PC 2-25-2025
2 of 106
Planning Commission Agenda February 25, 2025
1.Subject: Approval of December 10, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes (Postponed on
February 11, 2025)
Recommended Action: Approve December 10, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes
1 - Draft Minutes
2.Subject: Approval of February 11, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve February 11, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes
1 - Draft Minutes
POSTPONEMENTS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter
within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect
to a matter not on the agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the
public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Effective January 1, 2023, Government Code Section 65103.5 (SB 1214) limits the distribution of
copyrighted material associated with the review of development projects. Members of the public wishing
to view plans that cannot otherwise be distributed under SB 1214 may make an appointment with the
Planning Division to view them at City Hall by sending an email to planning@cupertino.org. Plans
will also be made available digitally during the hearing to consider the proposal.
OLD BUSINESS
NEW BUSINESS
3.Subject: 2024 General Plan Report
Recommended Action: Receive the General Plan Report
Staff Report
1 - GP 2024 Annual Report
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for staff to provide any updates on matters pertinent to the
Commission and for Commissioners to report on any Commission related activities they have taken part
in since the prior regularly scheduled meeting.
Page 3
3
PC 2-25-2025
3 of 106
Planning Commission Agenda February 25, 2025
FUTURE AGENDA SETTING
This portion of the meeting is reserved for the Chair or any two Commissioners to propose a future
agenda item within the jurisdiction of the Commission. A proposal to add a future agenda item shall be
brief and without discussion by the Commission.
ADJOURNMENT
If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this agenda, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. In the event an
action taken by the Planning Commission is deemed objectionable, the matter may be officially appealed
to the City Council in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Commission’s decision. Said
appeal is filed with the City Clerk (Ordinance 632).
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this
meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should
call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for
assistance. In addition, upon request in advance by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and
writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate
alternative format.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission after publication of the
packet will be made available for public inspection in the Community Development Department located
at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014 during normal business hours and in
Planning packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the City web site.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section
2.08.100, written communications sent to the City Council, Commissioners or staff concerning a
matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written
communications are accessible to the public through the City website and kept in packet archives. Do
not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not
wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will be made
publicly available on the City website.
For questions on any items in the agenda, or for documents related to any of the items on the agenda,
contact the Planning Department at (408) 777 3308 or planning@cupertino.org.
Page 4
4
PC 2-25-2025
4 of 106
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13727 Agenda Date: 2/25/2025
Agenda #: 1.
Subject: Approval of December 10, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes (Postponed on February 11,
2025)
Approve December 10, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/20/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™5
PC 2-25-2025
5 of 106
DRAFT MINUTES
CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, December 10, 2024
At 6:45 p.m. Chair David Fung called the Regular Planning Commission meeting to order and
led the Pledge of Allegiance in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre
Avenue and via teleconference.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair David Fung, Vice Chair Seema Lindskog, and Commissioners Muni
Madhdhipatla, Tejesh Mistry and Steven Scharf.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Subject: Approval of October 8, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve October 8, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes
MOTION: Lindskog moved and Mistry seconded to approve the October 8, 2024 Planning
Commission minutes.
The motion carried with the following vote: Ayes: Fung, Lindskog, Madhdhipatla, and
Mistry. Noes: None. Abstain: Scharf. Absent: None.
POSTPONEMENTS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
San R. expressed concern about the number of Planning Commission meetings that were
cancelled in prior years and also urged the commission to agendize a future item on density
swaps to amend the Priority Housing Sites list.
Lisa Warren discussed the lack of transparency and dismissive responses from city officials at a
recent meeting with the mayor and stressed the need for proactive communication, better
policies, and a unified approach to address the growing challenges facing Cupertino.
Ram Sripathi commented on the City Council and Planning Commission's lack of focus on
residents, stating that decisions are made too late and public input has no impact, and
additionally expressed disappointment in city leadership for not prioritizing the community.
6
PC 2-25-2025
6 of 106
CONSENT CALENDAR - None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
2. Subject: Zoning Map Amendment for Priority Housing Site No. 24 in the 6th Cycle
Housing Element (Application No.(s): Z-2024-001, EA-2024-001; Applicant: City of
Cupertino; APN: 359 13 019; Location: 20865 McClellan Road)
Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission adopt the draft resolution
(Attachment A) recommending that the City Council amend the City’s Zoning Map
changing the zoning for APN 359 13 019 from R-3 to R-3/TH to ensure consistency with
the 6th Cycle Housing Element.
Planning Manager Piu Ghosh introduced the item and gave a presentation.
Commissioner Madhdhipatla stated he can participate in this decision because he lives
outside the 1,000-foot radius of the subject property.
Commissioners disclosed ex-parte communications and site visits.
Senior Assistant City Attorney Woo explained the agenda item is to correct a clerical
mistake, as 14 sites in the housing element were intended to be zoned R3/TH but one was
inadvertently left out and action tonight is being taken to align the zoning with the
housing element as required by state law.
Commissioners asked clarifying questions.
Chair Fung opened the public hearing and the following people spoke:
• Ken Bell
• Teresa Ward
• Tracy K
• Frank Shen
• Simon Chen
• Esther Wong
• Debby
• Vicki Taniguchi
• Lucy Chen
• Daniel Ying
• Dennis Whittaker
• Laura Chin
• Ned Britt
• Steve Kelly
7
PC 2-25-2025
7 of 106
• Ava
• San R
• Elizabeth
• Ram Sripathi
• David
Chair Fung closed the public hearing.
Staff answered questions.
MOTION: Fung moved and Mistry seconded that the Planning Commission adopt the
proposed draft resolution recommending that the City Council amend the City’s Zoning
Map changing the zoning for APN 359 13 019 from R-3 to R-3/TH to ensure consistency
with the 6th Cycle Housing Element.
The motion carried with the following vote: Ayes: Fung, Lindskog, and Mistry.
Noes: Madhdhipatla and Scharf. Abstain: None. Absent: None.
OLD BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS - None
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
Piu Ghosh reported that the Allen Row project is complete, with several units sold and the City
is waiting on resubmittals for other projects, which will be updated on the project website once
received.
Chair Fung reported his attendance at the Crest Awards and stated Commissioners
Madhdhipatla and Mistry also attended the event.
FUTURE AGENDA SETTING - None
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:29 p.m., Chair Fung adjourned the Regular Planning Commission Meeting.
Minutes prepared by:
_______________________________
Lauren Sapudar, Deputy City Clerk
8
PC 2-25-2025
8 of 106
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13728 Agenda Date: 2/25/2025
Agenda #: 2.
Subject: Approval of February 11, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes
Approve February 11, 2025 Planning Commission Minutes
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/20/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™9
PC 2-25-2025
9 of 106
DRAFT MINUTES
CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION
Tuesday, February 11, 2025
At 6:45 p.m. Chair David Fung called the Regular Planning Commission meeting to order and
led the Pledge of Allegiance in the Cupertino Community Hall Council Chamber, 10350 Torre
Avenue and via teleconference.
ROLL CALL
Present: Chair David Fung and Commissioners Tracy Kolsolcharoen, Santosh Rao, and Steven
Scharf. Absent: Vice-Chair Seema Lindskog.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Subject: Approval of the December 10, 2024 Planning Commission Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve December 10, 2024 Planning Commission
Minutes
This item was postponed until the next regular Planning Commission meeting.
POSTPONEMENTS - None
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Muni Madhdhipatla mentioned having served on the previous Planning Commission,
expressed that the Commission was in good hands, expressed excitement about the new
Commissioners and those who were continuing service.
Seema congratulated new Commissioners, thanked everyone on the Planning Commission for
serving the community: and expressed full confidence the new Commission members would
effectively serve the needs of the community.
CONSENT CALENDAR- None
PUBLIC HEARINGS – None
OLD BUSINESS - None
NEW BUSINESS –
2. Subject: Election of Planning Commission Chair and Vice-Chair
Recommended Action: Elect Planning Commission Chair and Vice-Chair
Planning Manager Piu Ghosh delivered the staff report.
10
PC 2-25-2025
10 of 106
Chair Fung welcomed the new members of the Commission and thanked
previous Commissioners, including Tajesh Mistry and his contributions, as well
as Muni Madhdhipatla, stating how many viewpoints came together to make
decisions and expressing optimism that this would continue..
Chair Fung opened the floor for questions.
Planning Manager Piu Ghosh reminded the Commission that they had the option
to elect a representative to the Housing Commission.
Chair Fung opened the public comment period and the following people spoke:
• Peggy Griffin
• David (call dropped due to technical difficulties)
• Punam
• Muni Madhdhipatla
• David
• Seema
Chair Fung closed the public comment period.
Chair Fung asked for nominations for Planning Commission Chair.
MOTION: Scharf moved and Kolsolcharoen seconded to nominate Commissioner
Rao for Planning Commission Chair.
The motion carried with the following vote: Ayes: Kolsolcharoen, Rao, and Scharf.
Noes: Fung. Abstain: None. Absent: Lindskog.
Chair Fung clarified the reason for his vote – indicating while the duties
performed by the chair are straightforward, there is value in having experience.
Chair Fung asked for nominations for the Planning Commission Vice-Chair.
MOTION: Rao moved and Scharf seconded to nominate Kolsolcharoen as
Planning Commission Vice-Chair.
The motion carried with the following vote: Ayes: Fung, Kolsolcharoen, Rao, and
Scharf. Abstain: None. Absent: Lindskog.
Chair Fung asked for nominations for the Housing Commission.
MOTION: Rao moved and Fung seconded to nominate Scharf for the Housing
11
PC 2-25-2025
11 of 106
Commission Representative.
The motion carried with the following vote: Ayes: Fung, Kolsolcharoen, Rao, and
Scharf. Abstain: None. Absent: Lindskog.
Chair Fung stated that to avoid disruption during this meeting, the
Commissioners will remain in their seats though the roles have changed until the
next meeting.
Commissioner Fung congratulated Chair Rao on his appointment and handed
him the gavel.
Chair Rao acknowledged the bipartisanship on the prior Commission and stated
how he supported the prior nomination of Commissioner Fung for Chair.
3. Subject: 2025 Planning Commission meeting schedule
Recommended Action: Review the meeting schedule for 2025 (see Attachment 1)
and consider changes
Planning Manager Piu Ghosh introduced the item.
Chair Rao opened the item for clarifying questions from Commissioners.
Commissioners asked clarifying questions.
Chair Rao opened the public comment period. The following people spoke:
• Peggy Griffin
• Lisa
Chair Rao closed the public comment period.
Chair Rao asked if the Commission had any further discussion or would like to
make a motion.
MOTION: Scharf motioned to accept the calendar as distributed by the Planning
Department.
The Commissioners discussed which meetings they would keep and which
meetings they would cancel, depending on which meetings they would struggle
to get a quorum.
Chair Rao attempted to make a substitute motion.
12
PC 2-25-2025
12 of 106
City Attorney Michael Woo stated a substitute motion could not be made since
the original motion had not been seconded.
MOTION Scharf moved and Fung seconded to accept the calendar as distributed
by the Planning Department. This motion was not voted on.
MOTION: Rao made a substitute motion seconded by Kolsolcharoen, modifying
Scharf’s motion to cancel the December 23 and November 25 and August
Commission meetings. The motion carried with the following vote: Ayes: Fung,
Kolsolcharoen, Rao, and Scharf. Abstain: None. Absent: Lindskog.
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
Planning Manager Piu Ghosh announced the Planning Commissioners Academy was to be
held in Santa Rosa in early March and gave details about the Academy and dates. She also
spoke about the community meeting on the ODS, and stated the video and presentation have
been posted on Cupertino.gov/ODS, and will make the boards that were made available on the
website. She also brought up the mandatory upcoming Commissioner training.
Commissioners made comments.
FUTURE AGENDA SETTING
Commissioner Scharf shared an image and proposed the following 5 items as future agenda
items.
1. Establish a sub-committee to look at other cities’ balcony rules and craft rules and
policies for Cupertino.
2. Establish a sub-committee to look into rezoning the density of certain parcels with no
net loss to comply with SB-330.
3. Establish a sub-committee to research other cities’ oversize vehicle parking
ordinances.
4. Establish a sub-committee to research how to reach the 57% BMR level required in our
6th cycle RHNA.
5. Establish a sub-committee to research what can be done about residents being
displaced by expiring BMR housing.
City Attorney Michael Woo stated they would need a second to add those items to upcoming
agendas.
Commissioner Fung Seconded.
13
PC 2-25-2025
13 of 106
Commissioners and staff discussed future agenda items.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:21 p.m., Chair Rao adjourned the Regular Planning Commission Meeting.
Minutes prepared by:
_______________________________
Lindsay Nelson, Administrative Assistant
14
PC 2-25-2025
14 of 106
CITY OF CUPERTINO
Agenda Item
25-13679 Agenda Date: 2/25/2025
Agenda #: 3.
Subject: 2024 General Plan Report
Receive the General Plan Report
CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 2/20/2025Page 1 of 1
powered by Legistar™15
PC 2-25-2025
15 of 106
PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Meeting: February 25, 2024
Subject
2024 General Plan Annual Report
Recommended Action
Receive the General Plan Annual Report
Discussion
Background:
State law (Government Code Section 65400) requires that the City provide an annual
report, on or before April 1 of each year, to the legislative body (the City Council in
the case of Cupertino) regarding the status of the General Plan and progress in its
implementation, including meeting its share of regional housing needs, and local
efforts to remove governmental constraints to the maintenance, improvement, and
development of housing. The report must also be sent to the Office of Planning and
Research and Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD). See
Government Code § 65400(a)(2)(A)-(J).
In March 2024, the General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Reports
were presented to the City Council in compliance with State law and past practice.
Councilmembers did not have any substantial comments on the report.
Analysis:
General Plan Annual Report
The current General Plan Annual Report format has been used for the past several
years. The Policies and Strategies that support the General Plan Goals in each
Element are arranged in tabular form as the APR (See Attachment 1). Most Strategies
and Policies are implemented on an ongoing process through the Municipal Code
and through development project review and are identified in the report. The
purpose of this meeting is to allow the Planning Commission to receive the General
Plan Annual Report prior to presentation to the City Council. Edits have been made
to all sections of the report to reflect the work done by the City in implementing
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
(408) 777-3308 • FAX (408) 777-3333
16
PC 2-25-2025
16 of 106
General Plan policies and strategies. These edits are reflected in the attached
document in bold and underlined text.
In addition to the work reflected in Attachment 1, the Planning department
continues to review Planning Permits and building permits -- which involved
additional meetings, outreach and phone inquiries from members of the public -
Planning staff has responded to over 1,470 public counter inquiries in person, over
124 virtual appointments inquiries and over 1,320 email inquiries from members of
the public. Additionally, Planning staff also worked on Municipal Code
amendments in 2024, which were adopted by Council, related to General
Commercial (CG) zoning districts and Fences. Staff has also prepared materials for
adoption of the Housing Element and associated amendments to implementing
documents.
In 2025, it is anticipated that staff will work on several implementation items from
the Housing Element, including a possible review of the parkland dedication fees
for higher density projects and preparation of Objective Design Standards. As
required by state law, in conjunction with preparation of the Housing Element, the
City embarked on an update of the Safety Element of the General Plan in a manner
outlined by state law, with review by CalFire (the state agency which reviews a draft
of the Element prior to City adoption of the document). It is anticipated that a draft
Safety Element will be available for public comment in Spring 2025.
Next Steps
This report will be presented to City Council in March 2025.
_______________________________________________________________________
Prepared by: Piu Ghosh, Planning Manager
Reviewed and Approved for Submission by: Luke Connolly, Acting Director of
Community Development
Attachments:
1. Draft 2021 General Plan Annual Progress Report
17
PC 2-25-2025
17 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
BALANCED
COMMUNITY Policy LU‐1.1 Land Use and
Transportation
The City shall focus higher land use intensities and densities within half–mile of public transit service, and
along major corridors. Figure LU‐2 indiciates the maximum residential densities for sites that allow
residential land uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Existing land use densities are
established based on this principal except on certain
Housing Element sites for compliance with state law. Public
Transit Service does not include rideshare services such as
VIA, Lyft and Uber.
BALANCED
COMMUNITY Policy LU‐1.2
Non‐Residential
Development
Allocation
The City shall maintain non‐residential development allocations, which are assigned by Planning Area.
Some flexibility may be allowed for transferring non‐residential allocations between Planning Areas
provided that no significant environmental impacts are identified beyond those already studied in the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for Community Vision 2040.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. The General Plan amended in Sept. 2019 to
eliminate office allocation and complete all rezoning required
to comply with the Housing Element. No changes to allocation
were made in 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 or 2024.
BALANCED
COMMUNITY
Strategy LU‐
1.2.1
Planning Area
Allocations
Maintain and update the non‐residential development allocation table (Table LU‐1) to ensure that
allocations for various land uses adequately meet City goals for economic vitality, financial stability, and
placemaking.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item.Employee generation for office uses is
assigned at 300 s.f./employee in the GP EIR certified in 2014;
BALANCED
COMMUNITY
Strategy LU‐
1.2.2 Major Employers
Reserve an office development allocation for major companies with sales office and corporate
headquarters in Cupertino. Prioritize expansion of office space for existing major companies. New office
development must demonstrate that the development positively contributes to the fiscal well–being of the
city.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Important to note that residential allocation
may need to be were eliminated due to limitations of state law
with Housing Element update in 2024. The available
allocations as of 12/31/2024 are as follows:
1. Heart of the City: Commercial: 834,280 s.f.; Office: 17,113
s.f.; Hotel Rooms: 122; Residential: 11
2. Vallco Shopping District: Commercial:1,381,388 s.f.; Office:
45,387 s.f.; Hotel Rooms: 191
3. Homestead: Commercial ‐ 1,093 s.f.; Residential: 150
4. N. De Anza: Residential: 97
5. N. Vallco: None
6. S. De Anza: Commercial ‐ 4,035 s.f.
7. Bubb: None
8. Monta Vista: Commercial: 4,657 s.f.; Office: 13,595 s.f.;
Residential: 47
9. Other: Commercial: 11,225 s.f.; Residential: 38
10. Major Employers: Office: 383,322 s.f.
BALANCED
COMMUNITY
Strategy LU‐
1.2.3
Unused Non‐
Residential
Development
Allocation
Unused non‐residential development allocations may be re–assigned to the citywide allocation table per
Planning Area, when development agreements and development permits expire.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item. This is routinely done as projects expire.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con18
PC 2-25-2025
18 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
BALANCED
COMMUNITY Policy LU‐1.3
Land Use in All
Citywide Mixed–Use
Districts
Encourage land uses that support the activity and character of mixed–use districts and economic goals.Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Information provided as and when
applicants/property owners approach city
BALANCED
COMMUNITY
Strategy LU‐
1.3.1
Commercial and
Residential Uses
Review the placement of commercial and residential uses based on the following criteria:
1. All mixed–use areas with commercial zoning will require retail as a substantial component. The North
De Anza Special Area is an exception.
2. All mixed–use residential projects shall comply with “mixed–use village” concept discussed later in this
Element.
3. On sites with a mixed–use residential designation, residential densities are established in Figure LU‐2
with specifics in the land use map, where required, with land use designation defined in Appendix A.
4. 100% residential development is allowed on mixed‐use sites, if at least 40% of total units are affordable,
including atleast 20% of the total units affordable to lower income households.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item. This is reviewed with project review.
Consider capturing changes to state law in the future.
BALANCED
COMMUNITY
Strategy LU‐
1.3.2
Public and
Quasi–Public Uses
Review the placement of public and quasi–public activities in limited areas in mixed–use commercial and
office zones when the following criteria are met:
1. The proposed use is generally in keeping with the goals for the Planning Area, has similar patterns of
traffic, population or circulation of uses with the area and does not disrupt the operation of existing uses.
2. The building form is similar to buildings in the area (commercial or office forms). In commercial areas,
the building should maintain a commercial interface by providing retail activity, storefront appearance or
other design considerations in keeping with the goals of the Planning Area.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Information provided as and when
applicants/property owners approach city and reviewed in
conjunction with discretionary project review/approval
BALANCED
COMMUNITY Policy LU‐1.4 Parcel Assembly Encourage parcel assembly and discourage parcelization to ensure that infill development meets City
standards and provides adequate buffers to neighborhoods.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. A regular ordinance was adopted in
November 2022. Pending state legislation may require changes
to these regulations in 2024/2025.
BALANCED
COMMUNITY Policy LU‐1.5 Community Health
Through Land Use Promote community health through land use and design.Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Grants IM
In late 2019, Council adopted new limits on storefront signage
advertising tobacco sales and a ban on:
* Flavored tobacco sales,
* New tobacco retailers within 1,000 feet of a school or 500 feet
of an existing tobacco retailer,
* sales at pharmacies and vending machines.
The Council adopted a ban on all vaping products and
smoking in multifamily developments in June 2021.
BALANCED
COMMUNITY Policy LU‐1.6 Jobs/Housing Balance Strive for a more balanced ratio of jobs and housing units.Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Grants Con.
Not an action item. Worthy for the City to strive to ʺseek a
balanceʺ as opposed to using a numerical ʺratio.ʺ The City is in
the process of developing adopted the 6th Cycle Housing
Element to identify sites that can accommodate its fair share of
regional housing needs. Anticipated adoption of Housing
Element and required rezoning by in Spring 2024 with
rezoning adopted in Summer 2024.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con19
PC 2-25-2025
19 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
COMMUNITY
IDENTITY Policy LU‐2.1 Gateways
Implement a gateway plan for the City’s entry points (Figure LU–1) and identify locations and design
guidelines for gateway features. Look for opportunities to reflect the gateway concept when properties
adjacent to defined gateways are redeveloped.
Public Works –
Engineering and
Transportation
General Fund,
Development
fees
Con.
No action is needed at this time. Gateway signs are installed
through the Capital Improvements Project or through
development review.
COMMUNITY
IDENTITY Policy LU‐2.2 Pedestrian–Oriented
Public Spaces
Require development to incorporate pedestrian–scaled elements along the street and within the
development such as parks, plazas, active uses along the street, active uses, entries, outdoor dining and
public art.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
fees
Con. Not an action item.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN Policy LU‐3.1 Site Planning
Ensure that project sites are planned appropriately to create a network of connected internal street that
improve pedestrian and bicycle access, provide public open space and building layouts that support city
goals related to streetscape character for various Planning Areas and corridors.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con. Not an action item.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN Policy LU‐3.2 Building Heights and
Setback Ratios
Maximum heights and setback ratios are specified in the Community Form Diagram (Figure LU–2). As
indicated in the figure, taller heights are focused on major corridors, gateways and nodes. Setback ratios
are established to ensure that the desired relationship of buildings to the street is achieved.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. The City adopted minor changes to Figure
LU‐2 to clarify language in October 2021. The Council adopted
changes to Figure LU‐2 to reflect the changes to land uses for
Housing Element compliance in May 2024.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN Policy LU‐3.3 Building Design Ensure that building layouts and design are compatible with the surrounding environment and enhance
the streetscape and pedestrian activity.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
IM
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
discretionary project review/approval. Work Program item for
objective design guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption
of objective design standards in late Fall 2024.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.1 Attractive Design
Emphasize attractive building and site design by paying careful attention to building scale, mass,
placement, architecture, materials, landscaping, screening of equipment, loading areas, signage and other
design considerations.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
IM
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
discretionary project review/approval. Work Program item for
objective design guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption
of objective design standards in late Fall 2024.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.2 Mass and Scale Ensure that the scale and interrelationships of new and old development complement each other.
Buildings should be grouped to create a feeling of spatial utility.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
IM
Not an action item. Currently implemented via the
discretionary design review process, Municipal Code and
Specific Plans. Work Program item for objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective
design standards in late Fall 2024.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.3 Transitions
Buildings should be designed to avoid abrupt transitions with existing development, whether they are
adjacent or across the street. Consider reduced heights, buffers and/or landscaping to transition to
residential and/or low–intensity uses in order to reduce visual and privacy impacts.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
IM
Not an action item. Currently implemented via the
discretionary design review process, Municipal Code and
Specific Plans. Work Program item for objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective
design standards in late Fall 2024.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.4 Building Location Encourage building location and entries closer to the street while meeting appropriate landscaping and
setback requirements.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
IM
Not an action item. Currently implemented via the
discretionary design review process, Municipal Code and
Specific Plans. Work Program item for objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective
design standards in late Fall 2024.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con20
PC 2-25-2025
20 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.5
Architecture and
Articulation
Promote high–quality architecture, appropriate building articulation and use of special materials and
architectural detailing to enhance visual interest.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
IM
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/approval. Work Program item for objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective
design standards in late Fall 2024.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.6 Street Interface
Ensure that development enhances pedestrian activity by providing active uses within mixed–use areas
and appropriate design features within residential areas along a majority of the buildng frontage facing the
street. Mixed–use development should include retail, restaurant, outdoor dining, main entries, etc.
Residential development should include main entrances, lobbies, front stoops and porches, open space and
other similar features.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
IM
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ approval. Work Program item for objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective
design standards in late Fall 2024.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.7 Drive–up Services
Allow drive–up service facility only when adequate circulation, parking, noise control, architectural
features and landscaping are compatible with the expectations of the Planning Area, and when residential
areas are visually buffered. Prohibit drive–up services in areas where they conflict with pedestrian
oriented activity and design, such as Heart of the City, North De Anza Boulevard, Monta Vista Village and
neighborhood centers.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con. Not an action item. Information provided upon request.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.8
Specific and
Conceptual Plans
Maintain and update Specific/Conceptual plans and design guidelines for Special Areas such as Heart of
the City, Crossroads, Homestead Corridor, Vallco Shopping District, North and South De Anza corridors
and Monta Vista Village.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund IM
Update undertaken when directed to at Council discretion as
part of Work Program. Plans implemented through project
review/approval. Anticipated adoption of objective design
standards in late Fall 2024 2025.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.9 Entrances In multi–family projects where residential uses front on streets, require pedestrian–scaled elements such
as entries, stoops and porches along the street.
Community
Development – Planning
Development
Fees IM
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ approval. Work Program item for objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective design
standards in late Fall 2024 2025.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.3.10
Buildings Taller than 30
feet in neighborhoods
Allow construction of buildings taller than 30 feet in Neighborhoods only if the buildings abut an arterial
or major arterial collector or if allowed by State Law.
Community
Development – Planning
Development
Fees IM
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ approval. Work Program item for objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective design
standards in late Fall 2024 2025.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN Strategy LU‐3.4 Parking
In surface lots, parking arrangements should be based on the successful operation of buildings; however,
parking to the side or rear of buildings is desirable. No visible garages shall be permitted along the street
frontage. Above grade structures shall not be located along street frontages and shall be lined with active
uses on the ground floor on internal street frontages. Subsurface/deck parking is allowed provided it is
adequately screened from the street and/or adjacent residential development.
Community
Development – Planning None Required IM New Policy adopted with Housing Element adoption
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN Policy LU‐3.5 Light Polution Reduce light pollution and other adverse effects associated with night lighting from streets and urban
uses.
Community
Development – Planning None Required IM
New Policy adopted with Housing Element adoption. City
has already adopted Dark Sky standards in Chapter 19.102.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.5.1 Dark Sky Ordinance
Maintain Glass and Lighting Standards in the Cityʹs Municipal Code and require new development and
other applicable projects to comply with the adopted ordinance standards, which provide Dark Sky
regulations to reduce light pollution.
Community
Development – Planning None Required IM
New Strategy adopted with Hosuing Element adoption. City
has already adopted Dark Sky standards in Chapter 19.102.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con21
PC 2-25-2025
21 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN Policy LU 3.6 Bird Safety Enhance bird safety and reduce bird mortality from windows, other glass features, and certain lighting
elements that are known to increase the risk of bird collisions.
Community
Development – Planning None Required IM
New Policy adopted with Housing Element adoption. City
has already adopted Bird Safe standards in Chapter 19.102.
SITE AND BUILDING
DESIGN
Strategy LU‐
3.6.1
Bird Safe Desgin
Ordinance
Maintain Glass and Lighting Standards in the City’s Municipal Code and require new development and
other applicable projects to comply with the adopted ordinance standards, which provide Bird Safe Design
regulations to reduce the potential risk of bird collisions.
Community
Development – Planning None Required IM New Strategy adopted with Hosuing Element adoption. City
has already adopted Bird Safe standards in Chapter 19.102.
STREETSCAPE DESIGN Policy LU‐4.1 Street and Sidewalks Ensure that the design of streets, sidewalks and pedestrian and bicycle amenities are consistent with the
vision for each Planning Area and Complete Streets policies.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implemention via land use plan
streetscape requirements (Heart of the City, N. De Anza,
Monta Vista Design Guidelines etc.)
STREETSCAPE DESIGN Strategy LU‐
4.1.1
Streetscape
Improvements
Retain, and requrie implentation of sidewalk and streetscape design standards established in any
approved Specific Plan, Concept Plan, Zoning, or other area plans.
Public Works ‐
Development Services;
Community
Development ‐ Planning
Development
Fees Con.
New Strategy adopted with Hosuing Element adoption.
Adding a cross reference for existing standards in a Specific
Plan, Conceptual Plan or zoning ordinance.
STREETSCAPE DESIGN Policy LU‐4.2 Street Trees and
Landscaping
Ensure that tree planting and landscaping along streets visually enhances the streetscape and is consistent
for the vision for each Planning Area (Special Areas and Neighborhoods):
1. Maximize street tree planting along arterial street frontages between buildings and/or parking lots.
2. Provide enhanced landscaping at the corners of all arterial intersections.
3. Enhance major arterials and connectors with landscaped medians to enhance their visual character and
serve as traffic calming devices.
4. Develop uniform tree planting plans for arterials, connectors and neighborhood streets consistent with
the vision for the Planning Area.
5. Landscape urban areas with formal planting arrangements.
6. Provide a transition to rural and semi–rural areas in the City, generally west of Highway 85.
Public Works – Service
Center
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implemention via land use plan
streetscape requirements (Heart of the City, N. De Anza,
Monta Vista Design Guidelines etc.) and via Public Works
policies related to street tree planting.
CONNECTIVITY Policy LU‐5.1 Neighborhood Centers Retain and enhance local neighborhood shopping centers and improve pedestrian and bicycle access to
neighborhoods to improve access to goods and services.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Information provided as and when
applicants/property owners approach city and reviewed in
conjunction with discretionary project review/approval
CONNECTIVITY Policy LU‐5.2 Mixed–Use Villages
Where housing is allowed along major corridors or neighborhood commercial areas, development should
promote mixed–use villages with active ground–floor uses and public space. The development should help
create an inviting pedestrian environment and activity center that can serve adjoining neighborhoods and
businesses.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/approval and applicable land use plans (Heart of the
City etc.) Work Program item related to objective design
guidelines underway. Anticipated adoption of objective design
standards in late Fall 20242025.
CONNECTIVITY Policy LU‐5.3 Enhance Connections Look for opportunities to enhance publicly–accessible pedestrian and bicycle connections with new
development or redevelopment.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation.
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ approval.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.1 Historic Preservation
Maintain and update an inventory of historically significant structures and sites in order to protect
resources and promote awareness of the city’s history in the following four categories: Historic Sites,
Commemorative Sites, Community Landmarks, and Historic Mention sites (Figure LU–3).
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Inventory completed. Maintained in
General Plan.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con22
PC 2-25-2025
22 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.2 Historic Sites Projects on Historic Sites shall meet the Secretary of Interior Standards for Treatment of Historic
Properties.
Community
Development – Planning,
Community
Development – Building
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/approval.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.3
Historic Sites,
Commemorative Sies
and Community
Landmarks
Projects on Historic Sites, Commemorative Sites and Community Landmarks shall provide a plaque,
reader board and/or other educational tools on the site to explain the historic significance of the resource.
The plaque shall include the city seal, name of resource, date it was built, a written description and
photograph. The plaque shall be placed in a location where the public can view the information.
Community
Development – Planning,
Community
Development – Building
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/approval.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.4 Public Access
Coordinate with property owners of public and quasi–public sites to allow public access of Historic and
Commemorative Sites to foster public awareness and education. Private property owners will be highly
encouraged, but not required, to provide public access to Historic and Commemorative Sites.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/approval.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.5 Historic Mention Sites
There are sites outside the City’s jurisdiction that have contributed to the City’s history. Work with
agencies that have jurisdiction over the historical resource to encourage adaptive reuse and rehabilitation
and provide public access and plaques to foster public awareness and education.
City Manager General Fund Con.
Not an action item. When opportunities arise, provide
comments to neighboring agencies regarding this.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.6
Incentives for
Preservation of Historic
Resources
Utilize a variety of techniques to serve as incentives to foster the preservation and rehabilitation of
Historic Resources including:
1. Allow flexible interpretation of the zoning ordinance not essential to public health and safety. This could
include land use, parking requirements and/or setback requirements.
2. Use the California Historical Building Codes standards for rehabilitation of historic structures.
3. Tax rebates (Mills Act or Local tax rebates).
4. Financial incentives such as grants/loans to assist rehabilitation efforts.
Community
Development – Planning,
Community
Development – Building;
Parks and Recreation –
Park Improvement;
Public Works – Capital
Improvements
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Information provided when a project
applicant/property information proposes a project.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.7 Heritage Trees Protect and maintain the city’s heritage trees in a healthy state.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works – Service
Center
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implemention via Strategies LU‐
6.7.1 and project review by the Planning Division. Heritage
trees within public property maintained by the Street Tree
Division. An update of the tree list is part of the Cityʹs current
Work Program.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION
Strategy LU‐
6.7.1 Heritage Tree List Establish and periodically revise a heritage tree list that includes trees of importance to the community.Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. List maintained by the GIS division and
available on the Cityʹs GIS portal with support provided by the
Planning Division. Heritage Tree list may need to be updated
to remove several trees removed over the years due to
disease/natural causes.
HISTORIC
PRESERVATION Policy LU‐6.8 Cultural Resources Promote education related to the City’s history through public art in public and private developments.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works – Capital
Improvements
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via public art
review/approval by the Arts and Culture Commission (ACC).
The ACC has reviewed 3 public art project in 2023 and
continues to implement their programs, such as the
Distinguished Artist, Emerging Artist and Young Artist
Awards and Art in Unexpected Places.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con23
PC 2-25-2025
23 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
ARTS AND CULTURE Policy LU‐7.1 Public Art Stimulate opportunities for the arts through development and cooperation with agencies and the business
community.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via public art
review/approval by the Fine Arts Commission in compliance
with the Municipal Code.
ARTS AND CULTURE Strategy LU‐
7.1.1 Public Art Ordinance Maintain and update an ordinance requiring public art in public as well as private projects of a certain
size.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund IM
Ordinance update completed in 2018. Ongoing implementation
via project review/ approval.
ARTS AND CULTURE Strategy LU‐
7.1.2 Gateways Promote placement of visible artwork in gateways to the city.
Public Works – Capital
Improvements and
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via project
review/approval.
ARTS AND CULTURE Strategy LU‐
7.1.3 Artist Workplace Encourage the development of artist workspace, such as live/work units, in appropriate location in the
city.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via project
review/ approval. One live/work project approved on Foothill
Blvd in 2015. Updated Housing Element might consider
live/work arrangements on some housing sites along major
corridors.
FISCAL STABILITY Policy LU‐8.1 Fiscal Impacts Evaluate fiscal impacts of converting office/commercial ues to residential use, while ensuring that the City
meets regional housing requirements.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via project
review/approval.
FISCAL STABILITY Policy LU‐8.2 Land Use Encourage land uses that generate City revenue.
City Manager –
Economic Development;
Community
Development – Planning;
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via discretionary
project review/approval. Present revenue generation by land
use with project review.
FISCAL STABILITY Strategy LU‐
8.2.1 Fiscal Impacts Evaluate fiscal impacts of converting office/commercial uses to residential use, while ensuring that the
City meets regional housing requirements.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via project
review/approval.
FISCAL STABILITY Policy LU‐8.3 Incentives for
Reinvestment Provide incentives for reinvestment in existing, older commercial areas.City Manager –
Economic Development General Fund LR
No action has been taken/directed by the City Council
regarding this item.
FISCAL STABILITY Strategy LU‐
8.3.1 Mixed Use
Consider mixed–use (office, commercial, residential) in certain commercial areas to encourage
reinvestment and revitalization of sales–tax producing uses, when reviewing sites for regional housing
requirements.
Community
Development – Planning;
City Manager –
Economic Development
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Zoning for Housing Elmeent sites is being
considered completed with this lens.
FISCAL STABILITY Strategy LU‐
8.3.2
Shared or Reduced
Parking
Consider shared or reduced parking, where appropriate as incentives to construct new commercial and
mixed–use development, while increasing opportunities for other modes of transportation.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. The Municipal Code has shared parking
standards which are implemented during project review
(implementation of Transportation Demand Management
strategies via environmental review). Revisions to housing
development parking standards necessary upon completed
with adoption of the Cityʹs 6th Cycle Housing Element.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con24
PC 2-25-2025
24 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
FISCAL STABILITY Strategy LU‐
8.3.3
Infrastructure and
Streetscape
Improvements
Improve infrastructure and streetscape in areas such as the Crossroads or South Vallco area to encourage
redevelopment as a pedestrian–oriented area that meets community design goals.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services,
Capital Improvements
and Service Center
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented via the Capital Improvement
Program at the Councilʹs discretion/direction.
FISCAL STABILITY Strategy LU‐
8.3.4
High Sales–Tax
Producing Retail Use
Consider locations for high sales–tax producing retail uses (such as life–style and hybrid
commodity–specialty centers) provided the development is compatible with the surrounding area in terms
of building scale and traffic.
City Manager –
Economic Development General Fund LR
Continuing implementation by engaging with commercial
property owners and commercial brokers as well as attend
regional attraction events hosted by International Council of
Shopping Centers (ICSC)..
FISCAL STABILITY Policy LU‐8.4 Property Acquisition Maximize revenue from City–owned land and resources, and ensure that the City’s land acquisition
strategy is balanced with revenues.
City Manager ‐
Economic Development;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvements
General Fund Con.
Ongoing implementation by annual review of fees and services
provided. Cost benefit analysis of land acquisition is provided
to City Council for its decisions. In 2023, City Council acted to
surplus 10301 Byrne Ave and directed the City Manager to
City Manager to offer the Property for sale subsequent to
completion of the requirements of the Surplus Land Act.
FISCAL STABILITY Policy LU‐8.5 Efficient Operations Plan land use and design projects to allow the City to maintain efficient operations in the delivery of
services including, community centers, parks, roads, and storm drainage, and other infrastructure.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Will be reviewed at the next Housing
Element update and ongoing implementation via project
review/approval.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT Policy LU‐9.1 Collaboration With
Business Community
Collaborate with the business community to facilitate growth, development and infrastructure
improvements that benefit residents and businesses.
City Manager –
Economic Development General Fund Con.Ongoing implementation via partnerships with Chamber of
Commerce and other businesses in Cupertino.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.1.1
Economic Development
Strategy Plan
Create and periodically update an Economic Development Strategy Plan in order to ensure the City’s
long–term fiscal health and stability and to make Cupertino an attractive place to live, work and play.
City Manager –
Economic Development General Fund IM As of Dec. 2024, no Council direction to adopt an Economic
Development Strategy Plan.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.1.2 Partnerships Create partnerships between the City and other public, and private and non–profit organizations to
provide improvements and services that benefit the community.City Manager General Fund Con.
Ongoing implementation. Ongoing implementation via
partnerships with Chamber of Commerce and businesses in
Cupertino.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.1.3
Economic Development
and Business Retention
Encourage new businesses and retain existing businesses that provide local shopping and services, add to
municipal revenues, contribute to economic vitality and enhance the City’s physical environment.
City Manager –
Economic Development General Fund Con.
Ongoing implementation via continuous dialogue with the
business community, strengthening exisitng partnerships and
froming new ones, as well as outreach and engagement.
Ongoing implementation via the Cupertino Business Outreach
Program (CBOP).
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con25
PC 2-25-2025
25 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.1.4 Regulations
Periodically review and update land use and zoning requirements for retail, commercial and office
development in order to attract high–quality sales–tax producing businesses and services, while adapting
to the fast–changing retail, commercial and office environment.
City Manager ‐
Economic Development;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con.
Ongoing implementation via the Cityʹs Work Progam at the
Councilʹs direction/discretion. It is not in the current Cityʹs
Work Program.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.1.5 Incubator Work Space Encourage the development of flexible and affordable incubator work space for start–ups and new and
emerging technologies.
Community
Development – Planning
and City Manager –
Economic Development
General Fund Con.
Ongoing implementation via discretionary project
review/approval. Ongoing implementation via Cupertino
Business Connect, an online hub designed to serve as a one
stop platform for small businesses to connect with service
providers in Cupertino and the region.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.1.6 Development Review
Provide efficient and timely review of development proposals, while maintaining quality standards in
accordance with city codes. Look for a solution–based approach to problems while being responsive to
community concerns while promote positive communication among parties.
Community
Development – Planning
and Building
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via project
review/approval and building plan check.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT Policy LU‐9.2 Work Environment Encourage the design of projects to take into account the well–being and health of employees and the
fast–changing work environment.
Community
Development – Planning
and Building, Public
Works – Transportation
General Fund Con.
Public Works is implementing elements of the pedestrian and
bicycle master plans to promote healthier alternative forms of
transportation. Regnart Creek Trail completed in 2023.
Intersection improvements at De Anza Blvd and McClellan
Road (McClellan Bikeway Phase 3) completed in 2024. De
Anza Buffered Bike lane Project completed in 2024.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.2.1 Local Amenities Encourage office development to locate in areas where workers can walk or bike to services such as
shopping and restaurants, and to provide walking and bicycling connections to services.
Community
Development – Planning
and Economic
Development
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implementation in conjunction
with Land Use Element updates and project review/approval.
ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy LU‐
9.2.2 Workplace Policies Encourage public and private employers to provide workplace policies that enhance and improve the
health and well–being of their employees.City Manager General Fund Con.
Not an action item. In 2022, PC recommendeds that the health
policies be updated for generix pandemic policies related to
employee density and common areas but not policies specific
to COVID.
REGIONAL
COOPERATION AND
COORDINATION
Policy LU‐10.1 Regional Decisions
Coordinate with regional and local agencies on planning, transportation, economic development and
sustainability issues to ensure that the decisions improve fiscal health and the quality of life for Cupertino
residents and businesses.
Community
Development – Planning;
and City Manager –
Economic Development;
Public Works –
Transportation and
Environmental
Programs; City Manager
Public Works –
Sustainability
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Staff participates in Regional task forces,
working groups and advisory groups to ensure local points of
view are represented on an ongoing basis.
REGIONAL
COOPERATION AND
COORDINATION
Policy LU‐10.2 Regional Planning
Coordination Review regional planning documents prior to making decisions at the local level.Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implemenation in conjunction
with General Plan updates and project review/approval.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con26
PC 2-25-2025
26 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
REGIONAL
COOPERATION AND
COORDINATION
Policy LU‐10.3 Neighboring
Jurisdictions Collaborate with neighboring jurisdictions on issues of mutual interest.City Manager General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implemetation by participating in
Regional task forces, working groups and advisory groups to
ensure local points of view are represented.
REGIONAL
COOPERATION AND
COORDINATION
Policy LU‐10.4 Urban Service Area Work with neighboring jurisdictions to create boundaries that are defined by logical municipal service
areas.City Manager General Fund Con.
Not an action item. The City works with LAFCO to determine
these boundaries. The City has acquired property to form a
new park at the eastern border of the City. (near Rancho
Rinconada ‐ abutting Lawrence Expwy) Annexation completed
in 2022. In 2023, the City entered into an agreement with the
County to work cooperatively on a plan for future allowable
uses and annexation potential of the Lehigh/Heidelberg
Quarry. These will be presented to the Commission and
Council in coming years.
REGIONAL
COOPERATION AND
COORDINATION
Strategy LU‐
10.4.1
Tax Sharing
Agreements
Consider entering into tax–sharing agreements with adjacent jurisdictions in order to facilitate desired
boundary realignments.City Manager General Fund LR
No action has been taken with regard to tax‐sharing
agreements.
REGIONAL
COOPERATION AND
COORDINATION
Policy LU‐10.5 Annexation
Actively pursue the annexation of unincorporated properties within the City’s urban service area,
including the Creston neighborhoods, which will be annexed on a parcel–by–parcel basis with new
development. Other remaining unincorporated islands will be annexed as determined by the City Council.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. LAFCO encourages the annexation of all
county pockets. Ongoing implementation of this, as and when,
properties are available for annexation.
ACCESS TO
COMMUNITY
FACILITIES AND
SERVICES
Policy LU‐11.1 Connectivity
Create pedestrian and bicycle access between new developments and community facilities. Review
existing neighborhood circulation to improve safety and access for students to walk and bike to schools,
parks, and community facilities such as the library.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund Con.
No action required at this time. Ongoing implemenation via
implementation of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plans and
during project review/approval.
ACCESS TO
COMMUNITY
FACILITIES AND
SERVICES
Policy LU‐11.2 De Anza College
Allow land uses not traditionally considered part of a college to be built at De Anza College, provided
such uses integrate the campus into the community, provide facilities and services not offered in the City
and/or alleviate impacts created by the college.
City Manager General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Staff supports the incorporation of such
uses as the opportunity presents itself; however, the City does
not have land use or permitting authority over state facilities.
HILLSIDES Policy LU‐12.1 Land Use Regulations Establish and maintain building and development standards for hillsides that ensure hillside protection.
Community
Development – Planning
and Building, Public
Works – Development
Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via the Municipal
Code and project review/approval. These policies are now also
implemented through the Cityʹs regulations related to SB9
adopted in 2022.
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.1.1
Ordinance and
Development Review
Through building regulations and development review, limit development on ridgelines, hazardous
geological areas and steep slopes. Control colors and materials and minimize the illumination of outdoor
lighting. Reduce visible building mass with measures including, stepping structures down the hillside,
following natural contours, and limiting the height and mass of the wall plane facing the valley floor.
Community
Development – Planning
and Building, Public
Works – Development
Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via the Municipal
Code during project review/approval. These policies are also
implemented through the Cityʹs adopted regulations related to
SB 9 development adopted in November 2022.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con27
PC 2-25-2025
27 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.1.2 Slope–Density Formula
Apply a slope–density formula to very low intensity residential development in the hillsides. Density shall
be calculated based on the foothill modified, foothill modified 1/2 acre and the 5–20 acre slope density
formula. Actual lot sizes and development areas will be determined through zoning ordinances, clustering
and identification of significant natural features and geological constraints.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via Appendix F
of the General Plan and the Land Use Map. Does not apply to
SB 9 subdivisions.
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.1.3
1976 General Plan –
Previously Designated
Very Low Density:
Semi–Rural 5–Acre
Properties previously designated Very Low–Density Residential: Semi–Rural 5–Acre per the 1976 General
Plan may be subdivided using that formula. Properties that have already been since subdivided in
conformance with the above designation have no further subdivision potential for residential purposes.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. All properties within this category have
now sub‐divided. And no other potential for further
subdivision exists, except for subdivisions authorized under
SB 9.
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.1.4
Existing Lots in Foothill
Modified and Foothill
Modified 1/2–Acre
Slope Density
Designations
Require discretionary review with a hillside exception for hillside or R1 properties if development is
proposed on substandard parcels on slopes per the R1 and RHS zoning.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via the Municipal
Code. This provision cannot be applied to SB 9 projects.
HILLSIDES Policy LU‐12.2 Clustering Subdivisions
Cluster lots in major subdivisions and encourage clustering in minor subdivisions, for projects in the 5–20
acre slope density designation. Reserve 90 percent of the land in private open space to protect the unique
characteristics of the hillsides from adverse environmental impacts. Keep the open space areas contiguous
as much as possible.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implementation during project
review/approval.
HILLSIDES Policy LU‐12.3
Rural Improvement
Standards in Hillside
Areas
Require rural improvement standards in hillside areas to preserve the rural character of the hillsides.
Improvement standards should balance the need to furnish adequate utility and emergency services
against the need to protect the hillside, vegetation and animals.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via application of
rural standards maintained by the Public Works Department
and by SCC Fire in conjunction with project review/approval.
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.3.1 Grading Follow natural land contours and avoid mass grading of sites during construction, especially in flood
hazard or geologically sensitive areas. Grading hillside sites into large, flat areas shall be avoided.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via Municipal
Code standards during project review/approval. These policies
were implemented in 2022 through the Cityʹs ordinance
adopted in November 2022.
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.3.2 Roads Roads should be narrowed to avoid harming trees and streambeds.
Public Works –
Development Services,
Capital Improvements
and Transportation
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation via application of
rural standards maintained by the Public Works Department in
conjunction with project review/approval.
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.3.3 Trees Retain significant specimen trees, especially when they grow in groves or clusters and integrate them into
the developed site.
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implemenation via
implementation of the Municipal Code
HILLSIDES Policy LU‐12.4 Hillside Views
The Montebello foothills at the south and west boundary of the valley floor provide a scenic backdrop,
adding to the City’s scale and variety. While it is not possible to guarantee an unobstructed view of the
hills from every vantage point, an attempt should be made to preserve views of the foothills.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works – Capital
Improvements
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.Not an action item. Implemented by Strategies LU‐12.4.1 and
LU‐12.4.2
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.4.1
Views from Public
Facilities
Design public facilities, particularly open spaces, so they include views of the foothills or other nearby
natural features, and plan hillside developments to minimize visual and other impacts on adjacent public
open space.
Public Works – Capital
Improvements
General Fund,
Grants Con.Not an action item. Ongoing implementation during project
design
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con28
PC 2-25-2025
28 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.4.2
Development near
Public Space
Locate private driveways and building sites as far as possible from property boundaries adjoining public
open space preserves and parks to enhance the natural open space character and protect plant and animal
habitat.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund,
Development
Fees
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implemantation via
implementation of the Residential Hillside standards in the
Municipal Code
HILLSIDES Policy LU‐12.5 Development in the
County Jurisdiction
Development in the County, particularly if located near Cupertino’s hillsides and urban fringe area,
should consider the goals and policies in Community Vision 2040.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.Implemented by Strategy 12.5.1
HILLSIDES Strategy LU‐
12.5.1 County Development
Require development in these areas to comply with Cupertino’s hillside policies of low–intensity
residential, agricultural or open space uses, and to perserve the natural environment through clustering
development and dedication of open space. Visual impacts, access, traffic and other impacts, and service
demands should be assessed in consultation with Cupertino’s goals and policies.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Comments are sent to the County if
development is proposed near the Cupertino hillsides and
urban fringe area to ensure this is communicated.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐13.1 Heart of the City
Specific Plan
The Heart of the City Specific Plan provides design standards and guidelines for this area, which promote
a cohesive, landscaped boulevard that links its distinct sub–areas and is accessible to all modes of
transportation.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund IM
Not an action item. Heart of the City adopted by the Council in
1995 and amended several times (last in 2024). Amendments
may be necessary completed to the Heart of the City Specific
Plan to address rezoning required for purposes of the 6th
Cycle Housing Element in 2024.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐13.2 Redevelopment
Encourage older properties along the boulevard to be redeveloped and enhanced. Allow more intense
development only in nodes and gateways as indicated in the Community Form Diagram (Figure LU–2).
Community
Development – Planning General Fund IM
Not an action item. Heart of the City adopted by the Council in
1995 and amended several times (last in 2024). Amendments
may be necessary completed to the Heart of the City Specific
Plan to address rezoning required for purposes of the 6th
Cycle Housing Element in 2024.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐13.3 Parcel Assembly Encourage the assembly of parcels to foster new development projects that can provide high–quality
development with adequate buffers for neighborhoods.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. implemented during project review/
approval at the Councilʹs discretion. Amendments may be
required completed to the Heart of the City Specific Plan to
address rezoning required for purposes of the 6th Cycle
Housing Element in 2024.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐13.4 Neighborhood Centers
and Activity Areas
A majority of the commercial development allocation should be devoted to rehabilitating neighborhood
centers and major activity centers with a focus on creating pedestrian–oriented, walkable and bikeable
areas with inviting community gathering places. Land uses between the activity centers should help focus
and support activity in the centers. Neighborhood centers should be retrofitted and redeveloped using the
“neighborhood commercial centers” concept discussed earlier in this Element.
Community
Development –
Planning, Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.Not an action item. Implemented during project
review/approval.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐13.5 Land Use The Heart of the City area allows a mix of retail, commercial, office and residential uses. Special uses are
provided in the Heart of the City Specific Plan. See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Amendments may be required made to
Figure LU‐2 and Heart of the City Specific Plan to address
rezoning required for purposes of the 6th Cycle Housing
Element in 2024.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐13.6 Building Form Buildings should be high–quality, with pedestrian–oriented and active uses along the street.Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Design guidelines in Heart of the City
Specific Plan. Additionally, specific and objective design
guidelines to be developed with the Mixed‐use Design
Guidelines Work program item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con29
PC 2-25-2025
29 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐13.7 Streetscape and
Connectivity Create a walkable and bikeable boulevard with active uses and a distinct image for each subarea.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Streetscape design in Heart of the City
Specific Plan
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA
Strategy LU‐
13.7.1 Streetscape
Provide active uses along the street frontage, bike lanes, sidewalks that support pedestrian–oriented
activity, improved pedestrian crossings at street intersections, and attractive transit facilities (e.g., bus
stops, benches, etc.).
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Standards related to active uses in Heart of
the City Specific Plan, which is implemented in project
review/approval
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA
Strategy LU‐
13.7.2
Street Trees and
Landscaping
Create a cohesive visual image with street tree plantings along the corridor, but with distinct tree types for
each sub–area to support its distinct character and function.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
and Service Center
General Fund IM
Not an action item. Streetscape design in Heart of the City
Specific Plan. Possible changes due to item in FY23/24 City
Council Work Program.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA
Strategy LU‐
13.7.3 Connectivity
Properties within a block should be inter–connected with shared access drives. Provide pedestrian paths
to enhance public access to and through the development. New development, particularly on corner lots,
should provide pedestrian and bicycle improvements along side streets to enhance connections to
surrounding neighborhoods.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. E.g. all properties between N. Portal and
N. Blaney are inter‐connected with shared access drives. Most
properties between N. Blaney and Randy Lane are inter‐
connected. Bike and pedestrian improvements required for all
properties that develop.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA
Strategy LU‐
13.7.4 Traffic Calming Evaluate options on Stevens Creek Boulevard to improve the pedestrian environment by proactively
managing speed limits, enforcement, and traffic signal synchronization.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. City performs ongoing evaluations of
speed limits, traffic signal timing and coordination with
enforcement efforts. Staff participated in Stevens Creek
Corridor Vision Study, a cooperative effort with Cities of
Santa Clara and San Jose, as well as VTA and County, to
develop a list of recommended enhancements including to
the pedestrian environment.
HEART OF THE CITY
SPECIAL AREA
Strategy LU‐
13.7.5 Neighborhood Buffers Consider buffers such as setbacks, landscaping and/or building transitions to buffer abutting
single–family residential areas from visual and noise impacts.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Standards related to buffers in Heart of the
City Specific Plan and implemented with project review.
WEST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐14.1 Land Use Primary land uses include quasi–public/public facilities, with supporting mixed commercial/residential
uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Heart of the City
Specific Plan.
WEST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐14.2 Streetscape
Street tree planting that supports an active, pedestrian–oriented environment. Street tree planting should
provide a connection with the adjacent foothills with trees such as oaks.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Service Center
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Heart of the City
Specific Plan and Cityʹs street tree planting policies.
WEST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐14.3 Gateway Concept Buildings should be high–quality in keeping with the gateway character of the area. Projects should
provide or contribute towards gateway signs and landscaping.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Implemented during project review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con30
PC 2-25-2025
30 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
WEST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐14.4 De Anza College Node Buildings should be designed to fit into the surroundings with pedestrian–orientation. Externalizing
activities by providing cafeterias, bookstores and plazas along the street and near corners is encouraged.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Staff supports the incorporation of such
uses as the opportunity presents itself.
WEST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐14.5 Oaks Gateway Node This is a gateway retail and shopping node. New residential, if allowed, should be designed on the
“mixed–use village” concept discussed earlier in this Element.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund IM
Development project modification approved in December
2021. Units reduced from 267 to 259 by applicant. Project
description and plans available at
www.cupertino.org/westport.
WEST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐14.6 Community Recreation
Node
Contribute to the high–quality streetscape with trees, sidewalks, building and site design, and active uses
such as main entries, lobbies or similar features along the street to reinforce pedestrian orientation.
Public Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Heart of the City
Specific Plan.
CROSSROADS
SUBAREA Policy LU‐15.1 Crossroads Streetscape
Plan
Create a streetscape plan for the Crossroads Subarea that provides design standards and guidelines for an
attractive, walkable, vibrant shopping village, where commercial and roadway design encourage
pedestrian activity. The plan will include the following elements:
*Land use plan specifying the type, intensity and arrangement of land uses to promote pedestrian and
business activity.
*Streetscape plan that provides for an attractive pedestrian streetscape.
*Design guidelines that foster pedestrian activity and a sense of place.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund LR
While standards for an attractive, walkable and assessible
public sidewalk design have been established, no further
action has been taken on creation of a streetscape plan for the
Crossroads subarea.
CROSSROADS
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
15.1.1 Uses
Include in this subarea primary uses such as retail, office and commercial. Ground floor uses shall have
active retail uses with storefronts. Commercial office and office uses may be allowed on upper levels. In
the case of deep lots, building along the street should provide retail and buildings in the back may be
developed with allowed uses. See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Currently implemented through the Heart of the City Specific
Plan during project review since a separate Crossroads plan
has not been developed.
CROSSROADS
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
15.1.2 Streetscape
Primary ground–floor entrances shall face the street. The streetscape shall consist of wide pedestrian
sidewalks with inviting street furniture, street trees, pedestrian–scaled lighting with banners, small plazas,
art/water features, pedestrian crosswalks with special paving, and other elements identified in the
Crossroads Streetscape Plan.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund Con.
Currently implemented through the Heart of the City Specific
Plan during project review since a separate Crossroads plan
has not been developed.
CROSSROADS
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
15.1.3 Streetscape
Primary ground–floor entrances shall face the street. The streetscape shall consist of wide pedestrian
sidewalks with inviting street furniture, street trees, pedestrian–scaled lighting with banners, small plazas,
art/water features, pedestrian crosswalks with special paving, and other elements identified in the
Crossroads Streetscape Plan.
Community
Development – Planning,
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund Con.
Currently implemented through the Heart of the City Specific
Plan during project review since a separate Crossroads plan
has not been developed.
CROSSROADS
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
15.1.4 Shared Parking Require shared parking and access arrangements throughout the area, with overall parking standards
reflecting the shared parking.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Currently implemented through the Heart of the City Specific
Plan. Shared parking arrangements exist at the Target/Bottegas
site and the Crossroads Shopping Center.
CROSSROADS
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
15.1.5
De Anza Boulevard/
Stevens Creek
Boulevard Landmark
Secure permanent landscape easements as a condition of development from properties at the intersection
of De Anza and Stevens Creek Boulevards for construction of a future landmark. The landmark may
include open space, landscaping and other design elements at the corners. Land at the southeast corner
will remain a publicly accessible park.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Easements exist at the N‐E, S‐E and S‐W corners. The only
corner at which this does not exist, though the existing
building itself frames the corner is the N‐W corner. This will be
implemented with new development proposed at that corner.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con31
PC 2-25-2025
31 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
CITY CENTER
SUBAREA Policy LU‐16.1 City Center Node Maintain the City Center Node as a moderately–scaled, mixed–use office, hotel, retail and residential area,
with an integrated network of streets and open space.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
CITY CENTER
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
16.1.1 Uses
A mix of uses including, office, hotel, retail, residential and civic uses. The ground floor of buildings along
the street should be activated with pedestrian–oriented, active uses including retail, restaurants, and
entries. See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
CITY CENTER
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
16.1.2 Connectivity New development should improve the connectivity within the block and with surrounding streets,
including connections to the Crossroads subarea.
Community
Development – Planning; General Fund Con. Not an action item.
CITY CENTER
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
16.1.3 Building Form Buildings should be moderately–scaled to transition from existing taller buildings to the scale of the
surrounding area. Taller buildings should provide appropriate transitions to fit into the surrounding area.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Figure LU‐2 has slope line established and
Heart of the City Specific Plan has landscape easement
requirements.
CITY CENTER
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
16.1.4 Gateway Concept Buildings should be designed with high–quality architecture and landscaping befitting the gateway
character of the site.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item. Heart of the City Specific Plan has design
guidelines.
CITY CENTER
SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
16.1.5 Open Space
A publicly–accessible park shall be retained at the southeast corner of Stevens Creek and De Anza
Boulevards and shall include public art, seating areas and plazas for retail and restaurant uses along the
ground floor of adjacent buildings.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services General Fund Con. Not an action item. Completed.
CITY CENTER
SUBAREA Policy LU‐16.2 Civic Center Node Create a civic heart for Cupertino that enables community building by providing community facilities,
meeting and gathering spaces, public art, and space for recreation and community events.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvements
General Fund IM
Civic Center Master Plan provides guidance on capital projects
in this node. Library expansion project was considered in the
Civic Center Master Plan and was constructed in 2021.
CENTRAL STEVENS
CREEK BOULEVARD
SUBAREA
Policy LU‐17.1 Land Use
Allow a mix of uses including commercial, retail, commercial office and limited residential uses. The
ground floor of buildings along the street should be active uses including retail, restaurants, entries etc.
Neigborhood centers shall be remodeled or redeveloped using the “neighborhood commercial center”
concept described earlier in this Element. See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Main Street development completed in
2015. Metropoitan Condominiums built in 2006/2007.
Nineteen800 developed in 2016. Three properties owned by
Apple Inc. with offices are the only ones not redeveloped in
the recent past. A project on one of the Apple parcels currently
under review.
EAST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐18.1 Land Use
Allow regional commercial with retail, commercial, office and hotels as the primary uses, with residential
mixed–use as a supporting use. Retail, restaurant and other active uses are highly encouraged on the
ground floor facing the street. In case of office complexes, active uses such as entries, lobbies or plazas
should be provided on the ground floor along the street. Neighborhood centers shall be remodeled or
redeveloped using the “neighborhood commercial centers” concept described earlier in this Element. See
Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Heart of the City
Specific Plan during project review.
EAST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA Policy LU‐18.2 South Vallco Retain and enhance the South Vallco area as a mixed–use retail, office and residential district with a
pedestrian–oriented, downtown atmosphere.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
EAST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
18.2.1 Uses
Encourage a mix of retail, commercial, office, residential and hotel uses. Provide active retail uses on the
ground floor facing the street or outdoor pedestrian corridor with connections to adjacent development.
Office sites to the north of Vallco Parkway are encouraged to provide retail uses. However, if retail is not
provided, office sites should provide entries and active uses along the street frontage.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con32
PC 2-25-2025
32 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
EAST STEVENS CREEK
BOULEVARD SUBAREA
Strategy LU‐
18.2.2 Vallco Parkway Vallco Parkway is envisioned as a parkway with bike lanes, wide sidewalks, street–trees and on–street
parking. The street will connect to a future street grid in the Vallco Shopping District.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con. Not an action item.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Policy LU‐19.1 Allowed Land Uses
The following uses are allowed in the Vallco Shopping District Special Area (see Figure LU‐2 for
residential densities and criteria and Figure LU‐4 for location of allowable land uses):
1. Residential: Permit residential and ground floor commercial development within the portion of the site
designated for Regional Shopping/Residential uses in advance of creating a specific plan, at a maximum
density of 35 dwelling units per acre and a minimum density of 29.7 dwelling units per acre by right, with
maximum heights as shown in Figure LU‐2. Limited ground floor commercial uses are permitted, but not
required, in connection with residential development in the Regional Shopping/Residential portion of the
Special Area. Residential uses are permitted within the portion of the sites designated for Residential ‐
High/Very High Density uses, at a maximum density of 65 dwelling units per acre and a minimum density
of 50.01 dwelling units per acre, with a maximum height of 70 feet.
2. Non‐Residential: Permit commercial uses consistent with the Regional Shopping/ Residential and
Regional Shopping designation. Maintain a minimum of 600,000 square feet of retail that provide a good
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise)
project modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb
2024 under review. Planning Commission in 2020, as part of
the GP annual report process, reccommended on 4‐1 (Fung ‐
no) straw poll to consider requiring ground floor retail along
Vallco Parkway.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Policy LU‐19.2 Development
Standards
New development within the Vallco Shopping District Special Area shall be required to comply with the
following standards:
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.2.1 ʺTown Centerʺ Layout
Create streets and blocks laid out using ʺtransect planningʺ (appropriate street and building types for each
area), which includes a discernable center and edges, public space at center, high quality public realm, and
land uses appropriate to the street and building typology. Private streets must be open to the sky.
Connections between buildings are permitted at levels above the third floor for public serving uses or for
limited walkways (no wider than 10 feet) which may be private.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.2.2 Existing Streets
Improve Stevens Creek Boulevard and Wolfe Road to become more bike and pedestrian‐friendly with
bike lanes, wide sidewalks, street trees, improved pedestrian intersections to accommodate the
connections to Nineteen800, Main Street, and the surrounding areas.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.2.3 Tribal Coordination
The City of Cupertino shall coordinate with applicable Native American tribal representatives following
approval of development in the Vallco Shopping District Special Area to ensure appropriate cultural
sensitivity training is provided to all contractors prior to the start of ground‐disturbing activities.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Policy LU‐19.3 Specific Plan
Create a Vallco Shopping District Specific Plan prior to any development on the portion of the site with
the Regional Shopping designation that lays out the land uses, design standards and guidelines, and
infrastructure improvements required.
The Specific Plan will be based on the following strategies:
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.1 Master Developer
Redevelopment of the portion of the site with the Regional Shopping designation pursuant to the specific
plan will require a master developer in order remove the obstacles to the development of a cohesive
district with the highest levels of urban design.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.2 Parcel Assembly
Parcel assembly and a plan for complete redevelopment of the site is required prior to designating any
additional area for residential uses. Parcelization is highly discouraged in order to preserve the site for
redevelopment in the future.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con33
PC 2-25-2025
33 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.3
Complete
Redevelopment
The ʺtown centerʺ plan should be based on complete redevelopment of the site in order to ensure that the
site can be planned to carry out the community vision.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.4 Connectivity
Provide a newly configured complete street grid hierarchy of streets, boulevards and alleys that is
pedestrian‐oriented, connects to existing streets, and creates walkable urban blocks for buildings and open
space. It should also incorporate transit facilities, provide connections to other transit nodes and
coordinate with the potential expansion of Wolfe Road bridge over Interstate 280 to continue the walkable,
bikeable boulevard concept along Wolfe Road. The project should also contribute towards a study and
improvements to a potential Interstate 280 trail along the drainage channel south of the freeway and
provide pedestrian and bicycle connections from the project sites to the trail.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise)
project modification approved in Feb 2024received in Dec.
2023 building permits under review. Juniperro Serra trail
funding is in early stages. In 2020, as part of the GP Annual
Report, Comm. Fung wishes for the last sentence to be struck
from this Strategy.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.5 Open Space
Open space in the form of a central town square on the west and east sides of the district interspersed with
plazas and “greens” that create community gathering spaces, locations for public art, and event space for
community events.
Public Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.6 Building Form Buildings should have high‐quality architecture, and an emphasis on aesthetics, human scale, and create a
sense of place. Taller buildings should provide appropriate transitions to fit into the surrounding area.
Community
Development ‐ Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.7 Gateway Character High‐quality buildings with architecture and materials befitting the gateway character of the site. The
project should provide gateway signage and treatment.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.8 Phasing Plan A phasing plan that lays out the timing of infrastructure, open space and land use improvements that
ensures that elements desired by the community are included in early phases.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.9 Parking
Parking in surface lots shall be located to the side or rear of buildings. Underground parking beneath
buildings is preferred. Above grade structures shall not be located along major street frontages. In cases,
where above‐grade structures are allowed along internal street frontages, they shall be lined with retail,
entries and active uses on the ground floor. All parking structures should be designed to be architecturally
compatible with a highquality “town center” environment.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.10 Trees Retain trees along the Interstate 280, Wolfe Road and Stevens Creek Boulevard to the extent feasible, when
new development are proposed.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
VALLCO SHOPPING
DISTRICT SPECIAL
AREA
Strategy LU‐
19.3.11 Neighborhood Buffers Consider buffers such as setbacks, landscaping and/or building transitions to buffer abutting singlefamily
residential areas from visual and noise impacts.
Community
Development – Planning IM
Policy edited in September 2019. Vallco SB35 (The Rise) project
modification received in Dec. 2023 approved in Feb 2024
under review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con34
PC 2-25-2025
34 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐20.1 Land Use
This area is a major employment node with office, and research and development uses. Retail and hotel
uses are allowed on the west side of Wolfe Road. Redevelopment of the retail site at the corner of Wolfe
and Homestead Roads should be based on the “neighborhood commercial center” concept described
earlier in this Element. Retail uses are not required on the Hamptons site. See Figure LU–2 for residential
densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
The Hamptons project (on a Housing Element site) approved
in 2016. Building permits not submitted yet. Hotel at Cupertino
Village approved in 2019. Building permits not submitted yet.
In 2020, as part of the GP Annual Report process, Planning
Commission recommended that N. De Anza Special Area is
worthy of being re‐evaluated for a different balance of land
uses.
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐20.2 Streetscape and
Connectivity
Future roadway improvements on Wolfe Road, Homestead Road, and Tantau Avenue shall be
coordinated with planned improvements to improve pedestrian, bike and transit connections. Streetscape
improvements will enhance the pedestrian environment with street trees, attractive bus shelters, and street
furniture. The campus site shall continue to provide an attractive landscaped edge along the street. Future
improvements to the Wolfe Road bridge should be coordinated to preserve the vision for this area.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐20.3 Building Form
Buildings in the retail and hotel area should provide active, pedestrian–oriented uses along the street.
Buildings should transition to fit the scale of the surrounding area. Taller buildings should provide
appropriate transitions to fit into the surrounding area. In addition to the height limits established in the
Community Form Diagram, buildings abutting the campus shall incorporate appropriate setbacks,
landscaped buffering, and building height transitions to minimize privacy and security impacts.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐20.4 Pedestrian and Bicycle
Connections
Pedestrian–oriented retail and hotel development will support a diverse population of workers and
residents in the area. Trail routes, and alternate trail routes to address security and privacy concerns of
major employers, shall be developed to provide pedestrian and bicycle connections to other destinations.
Community
Development – Planning Con. Not an action item.
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐20.5 Gateway Concept
Building and landscape design should be of high quality and reflect the fact that this area is a gateway
into Cupertino from Interstate 280 and points north. The project should provide gateway signage and
treatment.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NORTH VALLCO PARK
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐20.6 Neighborhood Buffers Provide building transitions, setbacks and/or landscaping to buffer development from adjoining
single–family residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
NORTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐21.1 Conceptual Plan Amend the North De Anza Conceptual Plan to create a cohesive set of land use and streetscape
regulations and guidelines for the North De Anza area.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services,
IM
Relevant changes to N. De Anza will be considered with the
Housing Element udpate. Between 2022 and 2024, no changes
were made to the N. De Anza Special Area since no Housing
Sites were selected in this area by PC or CC.
NORTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐21.2 Land Use Primarily office, and research and development uses supplemented with limited commercial and
residential uses. See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund IM
Relevant changes to N. De Anza will be considered with the
Housing Element udpate. Between 2022 and 2024, no changes
were made to the N. De Anza Special Area since no Housing
Sites were selected in this area by PC or CC.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con35
PC 2-25-2025
35 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
NORTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐21.3 Streetscape and
Connectivity
North De Anza is envisioned as a walkable, bikeable boulevard with wide sidewalks with street trees and
roadway improvements for bike lanes and pedestrian crossings. Pedestrian and bike improvements and
enhanced pedestrian crossings are also envisioned along other streets in this area to create an
interconnected grid. Such improvements will also improve school routes from the Garden Gate
neighborhood to Lawson school to the east and provide access to transit routes.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund IM
Relevant changes to N. De Anza will be considered with the
Housing Element udpate. Between 2022 and 2024, no changes
were made to the N. De Anza Special Area since no Housing
Sites were selected in this area by PC or CC.
NORTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA
Strategy LU‐
21.4 Building Design
Locate buildings along the street with parking areas to the rear. Break up massing of large office buildings
along the street with pedestrian scaled elements and locate building entries and active uses along the street
frontage to improve the pedestrian character of the area. Mixed–use buildings should include entries,
active uses and gathering spaces along the street.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NORTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐21.5 Gateway Concept Building and landscape design should be of high quality and reflect the fact that this area is a gateway
into Cupertino from Interstate 280 and points north.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
NORTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐21.6 Neighborhood Buffers Provide building transitions, setbacks and/or landscaping to buffer development from adjoining
single–family residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund IM
As part of the ʺObjective Standardsʺ Work Program item, this
action is recommended as a Phase 1 action item. Expected to be
considered in conjunction with the Housing Element update.
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.1 Conceptual Plan Maintain and implement the existing South De Anza and Sunnyvale–Saratoga Conceptual Plans.Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.2 Land Use
General Commercial and retail uses with limited commercial office, office and residential uses.
Neighborhood centers should be redeveloped in the “neighborhood commercial centers” concept
discussed earlier in this Element. See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Planning Commission as part of the 2020
GP Annual Report process, recommends considering changing
the allowed mix of uses.
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.3 Parcel Assembly Highly encourage assembly of parcels to resolve the fragmented and narrow lot pattern and encourage
high–quality development with adequate buffers for neighborhoods.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.4 Streetscape and
Connectivity
South De Anza is envisioned as a walkable, bikeable boulevard with sidewalks, street trees and roadway
improvements for bike lanes and pedestrian crossings. Side streets are also envisioned with pedestrian and
bicycle improvements to ensure walkable connections from adjacent neighborhoods.
Public Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con.Not an action item.
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.5 Shared Access Since South De Anza is a heavily traveled route, properties in the same block should be connected with
auto and pedestrian access through shared access easements to reduce impacts on the corridor.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.6 Building Design
Locate buildings and commercial pads along the street with parking areas to the side and rear. Provide
pedestrian–scaled elements and active uses including retail, restaurants, and entries along the street.
Outdoor plaza and activity area can be located along the street with sidewalk and street trees to buffer
them from through traffic.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con36
PC 2-25-2025
36 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.7 Gateway Concept Building and landscape design should be of high quality and reflect the fact that this area has gateways
from Highway 85 and at the souther and eastern borders of Cupertino.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
SOUTH DE ANZA
SPECIAL AREA Policy LU‐22.8 Neighborhood Buffers Provide building transitions, setbacks and/or landscaping to buffer development from adjoining
single–family residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
HOMESTEAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.1 Conceptual Plan Create a conceptual plan for the Homestead Road Special Area with a cohesive set of land use and
streetscape regulations and guidelines.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund LR No action has been taken with regard to creating a conceptual
plan for the Homestead Special Area.
HOMESTEAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.2 Land Use
Primarily retail, commercial and residential uses, with some limited quasi–public use. Redevelopment of
neighborhood centers should be based on the “neighborhood commercial center” concept discussed earlier
in this element. See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
HOMESTEAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.3 Connectivity
Homestead Road is envisioned to become a boulevard with bike and pedestrian improvements and new
bicycle and pedestrian crossings at De Anza Boulevard, Blaney Avenue, Wolfe Road, and Tantau Avenue.
This will provide better access for people moving east/west through the City north of Interstate 280,
linking neighborhoods in the western part of the City with Homestead High School, Homestead Square
Shopping Center and Apple Campus 2 to the east.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con.Not an action item.
HOMESTEAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.4 Gateway Concept Building and landscape design should be of high quality and reflect the fact that this area is a gateway
into the northern part of Cupertino.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
HOMESTEAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.5 Neighborhood Buffers Provide building transitions, setbacks and/or landscaping to buffer development from adjoining
single–family residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
BUBB ROAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐24.1 Land Use Allowed uses in the Bubb Road Special Area will consist of those described in the ML–rc ordinance with
limited commercial and residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. As part of the 2020 General Plan Annual
Report, Planning Commission recommended considering
changing the allowed mix of uses.
BUBB ROAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐24.2 Streetscape and
Connectivity
Bubb Road is envisioned as a walkable, bikeable corridor with sidewalks, street trees and roadway
improvements for bike lanes and pedestrian crossings. Pedestrian and bike improvements and enhanced
pedestrian crossings are also envisioned along other streets in this area to create an interconnected grid.
Such improvements will also improve routes from the northern and eastern neighborhood to the tri–school
area, parks and services and reduce impacts caused to school and employment traffic.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Bike and pedestrian improvements
occuring in compliance with ped/bike Master Plans and funds
provided by private developers.
BUBB ROAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.3 Building and Site
Design
Locate buildings along the street with parking areas to the rear. Break up massing of large office buildings
along the street with pedestrian–scaled elements and locate building entries and active uses along the
street frontage to improve the pedestrian character of the area.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
BUBB ROAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.4 Compatibility of Use The compatibility of non–industrial uses with industrial uses must be considered when reviewing new
development.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con37
PC 2-25-2025
37 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
BUBB ROAD SPECIAL
AREA Policy LU‐23.5 Neighborhood Buffers New industrial uses should provide building transitions, setbacks and landscaping to provide a buffer for
adjoining low–intensity residential users.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE Policy LU‐25.1 Conceptual Plan
Continue to govern Monta Vista’s commercial area through the Monta Vista Design Guidelines. The
guidelines provide direction for architecture, landscaping and public improvements. Create a Monta Vista
Village Conceptual Plan with a cohesive set of updated regulations and guidelines for this area.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con./LR
No action has been taken with regard to creating a Monta Vista
Village Conceptual Plan, though the Monta Vista Design
Guidelines are in effect and continue to be implemented.
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE Policy LU‐25.2 Land Use
Require the commercial district to serve as a neighborhood commercial center for Monta Vista Village and
its adjoining neighborhoods. Mixed–use with residential is encouraged. The industrial area should be
retained to provide small–scale light industrial and service industrial opportunities, while remaining
compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses. See Figure LU–2 for residential
densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item. Current zoning supports this.
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE Policy LU‐25.3 Buildings and Site
Design
Encourage buildings to be designed in a way that promotes the small–scale, older and mixed–use
character of the area. Buildings should be located along the street with pedestrian–scale architecture and
retail and active uses on the ground floor. Parking should be located to the rear.
Community
Development Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through existing standards in
the Monta Vista Design Guidelines.
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE
Strategy LU‐
25.3.1 Storefront Appearance
Commercial and office buildings shall include a storefront appearance to the public street, and shall not be
separated from the public sidewalk by extensive landscaping or changes in elevation. Office buildings
shall be designed to accommodate future entrances from the sidewalk for future retail uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through existing standards in
the Monta Vista Design Guidelines.
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE
Strategy LU‐
25.3.2 Parking
Commercial properties or commercial portions of properties may rely on public parking on Pasadena and
Imperial Avenues to meet their off–site parking needs within the area bounded by Granada Avenue,
Stevens Creek Boulevard, Orange Avenue, and the Union Pacific right–of–way (see diagram to the right).
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE Policy LU‐25.4 Street Design and
Connectivity
Maintain Monta Vista Village as a walkable, bikeable mixed–use neighborhood with sidewalks, street
trees and roadway improvements for bike lanes and sidewalks with routes to the tri–school area.
Automobile, pedestrian and bicycle improvements are envisioned along other streets in this area to create
an interconnected grid and with new development to remove street blockages and promote a network of
streets. On–street parking is encouraged. Roadway and sidewalk improvements will also improve school
routes from the northern neighborhoods to the tri–school area.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.Not an action item. School route and sidewalk improvements
being completed through the Capital Improvements Project.
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE
Strategy LU‐
25.4.1 Interconnected Access Individual properties shall have interconnected pedestrian and vehicle access and shared parking.Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through existing standards in
the Monta Vista Design Guidelines.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con38
PC 2-25-2025
38 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
MONTA VISTA
VILLAGE
Strategy LU‐
25.4.2 Residential Streets
Residential street improvements may have a semi–rural appearance based on the Municipal Code
requirements. Safe routes to school streets, or any others designated by the City Council shall be required
to have sidewalks and street trees.
Public Works–
Development Services General Fund Con. Not an action item.
OTHER
NON–RESISENTIAL/
MIXED–USE SPECIAL
AREAS
Policy LU‐26.1 Land Use
Retrofit or redevelop neighborhood centers using the “neighborhood commercial centers” concept
discussed earlier in this Element. Areas that are not designated as “neighborhood centers” are encouraged
to provide commercial uses with active uses such as entries, lobbies, seating areas or retail along the street.
See Figure LU–2 for residential densities and criteria.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
OTHER
NON–RESISENTIAL/
MIXED–USE SPECIAL
AREAS
Policy LU‐26.2 Building and Site
Design
Require buildings to be designed in a pedestrian–oriented format. Buildings shall be located along the
street with pedestrian–scale architecture and retail and active uses on the ground floor. Parking shall be
located to the sides or rear of buildings. Heights are as allowed, by Figure LU‐2 and/or the Land Use Map,
with one to two story heights preferred closests to lower density residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. In 2023, changes may be necessary to this
policy to address the 6th Housing Element update.Strategies
were added related to parking location and design that apply
to all Special Areas.
OTHER
NON–RESISENTIAL/
MIXED–USE SPECIAL
AREAS
Policy LU‐26.3 Street Design and
Connectivity
Create neighborhood centers that area walkable, bikeable areas with sidewalks, street trees and roadway
improvements for bike lanes sidewalks to provide connections to the neighborhoods that they service.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
OTHER
NON–RESISENTIAL/
MIXED–USE SPECIAL
AREAS
Policy LU‐26.4 Neighboring Buffers Encourage projects to include building transitions, setbacks and landscaping to provide a buffer for
adjoining low–intensity residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Relevant changes as a result of zoning changes resulting from
the 6th Cycle Housing Element update will be proposed in
2024. New zoning standards adopted to address development
on Housing Element sites in these areas to address these
issues.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.1 Compatibility
Ensure that new development within and adjacent to residential neighborhoods is compatible with
neighborhood character.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Strategy LU‐
27.1.1 Regulations Maintain and update design regulations and guidelines for single–family development that address
neighborhood compatibility and visual and privacy impacts.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Strategy LU‐
27.1.2
Neighborhood
Guidelines
Identify neighborhoods that have a unique architectural style, historical background or location and
develop plans that preserve and enhance their character. Support and budget for special zoning or design
guidelines (e.g. the Fairgrove Eichler neighborhood) and single–story overlay zones in neighborhoods,
where there is strong neighborhood support.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Strategy LU‐
27.1.3 Flexibility When neighborhoods are in transition, add flexibility for requirements for new development that
acknowledge the transition while continuing to respect the existing neighborhood.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Strategy LU‐
27.1.4 Late Night Uses
Discourage late–evening entertainment activities such as night–clubs in commercial areas where parcels
are especially narrow, abut single–family residential development, and cannot adequately provide visual
and noise buffers.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con39
PC 2-25-2025
39 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.2 Relationship to the
Street
Ensure that new development in and adjacent to neighborhoods improve the walkability of
neighborhoods by providing inviting entries, stoops and porches along the street frontage, compatible
building design and reducing visual impacts of garages.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.3 Entries Define neighborhood entries through architecture, or landscaping appropriate to the character of the
neighborhood. Gates are discouraged because they isolate developments from the community.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.4 Connections
Support pedestrian and bicycling improvements that improve access with neighborhoods to parks,
schools and local retail, and between neighborhoods. Support traffic calming measures rather than
blocking the street to reduce traffic impacts on neighborhoods.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Bike/Ped Master
Plans and the Capital Improvement project and/or project
review.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.5 Streets
Determine appropriate street widths, bike lane, sidewalk and streetlight design to define the unique
character of neighborhoods, where appropriate.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.6 Multi–family
Residential Design Maintain an attractive, liveable environment for multi–family dwellings.Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Strategy LU‐
27.6.1
Provision of Outdoor
Areas
Provide outdoor areas, both passive and active, and generous landscaping to enhance the surroundings
for multi–family residents. Allow public access to the common outdoor areas whenever possible.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.7 Compatibility of Lots Ensure that zoning, subdivision and lot–line adjustment requests related to lot size or lot design consider
the need to preserve neighborhood lot patterns.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Strategy LU‐
27.7.1 Lot Size
Ensure that subdivision and lot–line adjustment requests respect the neighborhood lot size patterns.
Consider revisions to lot size requirements if the neighborhood lot pattern is different from the zoning
requirements.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Strategy LU‐
27.7.2 Flag Lots Allow flag lots only in cases where they are the sole alternative to integrate subdivisions with the
surrounding neighborhood.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con.Not an action item.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.8 Protection
Protect residential neighborhoods from noise, traffic, light, glare, odors and visually intrusive effects from
more intense development with landscape buffers, site and building design, setbacks and other
appropriate measures.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented via standards in the
Municipal Code.
NEIGHBORHOODS Policy LU‐27.9 Amenities and Services Improve equitable distribution of community amenities such as parks and access to shopping within
walking and bicycling distance of neighborhoods.
Public Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund IM
Parks Master Plan provides guidance to enhance an equitable
distribution of community amenities. No further action
required at this time.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con40
PC 2-25-2025
40 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
INSPIRATION
HEIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD
Policy LU‐28.1 Connectivity
Improve bicycle and pedestrian environment along Foothill Boulevard and Stevens Canyon Road to
improve neighborhood connectivity to services as well as for hikers and bikers accessing natural open
spaces in the vicinity.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Ped/Bike Master
Plans and improvements for private developments. Will
address improvements along these corridors in the Active
Transportation Plan, currently under development.
INSPIRATION
HEIGHTS
NEIGHBORHOOD
Policy LU‐28.2 Merriman–Santa Lucia
Neighborhood
Allow legal, non–conforming duplexes to remain in the area bounded by Santa Lucia Road, Alcalde Road
and Foothill Boulevard.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
OAK VALLEY
NEIGHBORHOOD Policy LU‐29.1 Development Intensity
Require development intensity for the single–family Oak Valley neighborhood to be consistent with the
development agreement that includes the use permit and other approvals. The development agreement
describes development areas, intensity and styles of development, public park dedication, tree protection,
access and historic preservation. The theme of the approvals is to balance development with
environmental protection by clustering development, setting it back from sensitive environmental areas
and preserving large areas as permanent open space.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
OAK VALLEY
NEIGHBORHOOD Policy LU‐29.2 Design Elements
Require buildings to reflect the natural hillside setting as required in residential hillside zones with
traditional architectural styles and natural materials and colors. Larger building elements should be scaled
to respect the existing development in the surrounding area.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Architectural standards in the approved
documents for the Oak Valley development.
FAIRGROVE
NEIGHBORHOOD Policy LU‐30.1 Development
Standards Require all new construction to conform to the R1–e zoning (Single Family Residential – Eichler).Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.Not an action item.
FAIRGROVE
NEIGHBORHOOD Policy LU‐30.2 Design Guidelines Encourage residents to incorporate the design guidelines illustrated in the Eichler Design Guidelines.Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
AVAILABILITY OF
HOUSING Policy HE‐1.1
PROVISION OF
ADEQUATE
CAPACITY FOR NEW
CONSTRUCTION
NEED
Designate sufficient land at appropriate densities to accommodate Cupertino’s Regional Housing Needs
Allocation of 4,588 units for the 2023‐ 2031 planning period.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund IM
Completed with identification of Priority Housing Sites in
2014/2015 and completion of rezoning in 2019. Housing
Element update to accomodate 6th Cycle RHNA of 4,588 units
commenced in October 2021, statutorily required to be
completed by Jan. 31 2023. Initial outreach conducted in 2021.
Expected to be completed by Fall 2023. The Housing Element
was adopted in May 2024, with HCD certification in September
2024.The City of Cupertino completed identification of
Priority Housing Sites and completed neccesary rezoning to
accomidate the RHNA shortfall of the Housing Element 6th
Cycle through a resolution and ordinance passed by City
Council in July 2024. The City received certification from
HCD in September 2024.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con41
PC 2-25-2025
41 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
AVAILABILITY OF
HOUSING Policy HE‐1.2 Housing Densities Provide a full range of densities for ownership and rental housing.Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to ensure that
both ownership and rental housing will be provided at a full
range of densities through enforcement of new zoning and
development standards during the planning period through
the application process.
AVAILABILITY OF
HOUSING Policy HE‐1.3 Mixed‐use
Development Encourage mixed–use development near transportation facilities and employment centers.Community
Development – Housing None Required Con.
Not an action item, however staff will continue to work to
encourage mixed‐used development, particularly around
frequent transit and business centric corridors, such as
Stevens Creek Blvd, through outreach to employers and
commercial property owners.
AVAILABILITY OF
HOUSING
Strategy HE‐
1.3.1
LAND USE POLICY
AND ZONING
PROVISIONS
To accommodate the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), the City will continue to: ● Provide
adequate capacity through the Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the RHNA
while maintaining a balanced land use plan that offers opportunities for employment growth,
commercial/retail activities, services, and amenities. ● Amend development standards for housing as
required to provide objective standards that are adequate and appropriate to facilitate a range of housing
in the community. ● Monitor the sites inventory and make it available on the City’s website.
AVAILABILITY OF
HOUSING
STRATEGY HE‐
1.3.2
REZONING TO
ACHIEVE RHNA
To ensure that the City has sufficient sites zoned appropriately to achieve the City’s Regional Housing
Needs Allocation (RHNA), rezone sites listed in Table B4‐7 and B4‐9 (Appendix B4). The rezone will
include 28.98 acres of residential land that will allow for a realistic capacity of 1,510 units, and 31.75 acres
of commercial/residential land that will allow for a realistic capacity of 1,727 units. The City will ensure
compliance with Government Code Sections 65583 (c) (1) and 65583.2(h) and 65583.2(i), as listed below. ●
Permit owner‐occupied and rental multifamily uses by right and not require a conditional use permit or
Strategy HE‐
1.3.3
NEW RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICTS
AND LAND USE
DESIGNATIONS
To ensure the City can meet the RHNA, the following actions will be taken: Zoning. Create a new R4
Zoning District that will align with the two new General Plan Land Use designations, High/Very High
Density allowing 50.01 to 65 units per acre, and Very High Density allowing 65.01 to 80 units per acre. The
City will create development standards that will allow the maximum density of this district to be achieved.
This will include increased height limits to allow at least three stories, reduced setbacks, reduced lot
coverage, and reduced parking requirements. General Plan Land Use Designations. Create two new
General Plan Land
Use Designations – High/Very High Density, which will allow for 50.01–65 units per acre, and Very High
Density, which will allow for 65.01–80 units per acre. The City will also revise the Commercial/Residential
designation to identify different densities at which residential development could occur on property zoned
for Residential mixed uses for clarity, and allow 100 percent residential on sites with a General Plan Land
Use designation of Commercial/Residential, if the project is affordable
New zoning distrcits and general plan designations were
approved through a public hearing before the City Council,
allowing for the new development standards under the
High/Very High Density (50.01 to 65 units per acre) and Very
High Density (65.01 to 80 units per acre). (Resolution 24‐039,
Ordinance 24‐2262, Ordinance 24‐2261). Complete as of July
2024.
Action completed. The City continued to provide adequate
capacity through the Land Use Element and Zoning Ordinance
to accommodate the RHNA allocation, monitor development
standards, monitor sites inventory, and monitor development
activity on Housing Opportunity Sites. City is currently
working on the 6th Cycle of the Housing Element. The City
continued to provide adequate capacity through the Land
Use Element and Zoning Ordinance to accommodate the
RHNA allocation, monitor development standards, monitor
sites inventory, and monitor development activity on
Housing Opportunity Sites. City is currently working on the
6th Cycle of the Housing Element.
None Required
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
IM
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con42
PC 2-25-2025
42 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
Strategy HE‐
1.3.4
DEVELOPMENT ON
NONVACANT SITES
Establish an outreach and coordination program to connect developers, builders, and owners of
nonvacant sites. The program shall: a. Emphasize reaching out to owners of nonvacant sites to discuss any
interest in redeveloping and available incentives. b. Market and advertise these sites to the development
community along with any incentives that might be available. c. Establish biennial meetings with
developers and builders to discuss development opportunities. If no projects are proposed on nonvacant
sites within the first half of Housing Element planning period, the City will provide additional incentives,
which will include, but are not limited to: a. Priority project processing b. Waive development impact or
delay permit fees for affordable units c. Flexibility in development standards, such as parking, setbacks,
and landscaping requirements d. Support grant application requests for funding made by developers for
infrastructure upgrades. e. Assist developers of 100 percent affordable housing developments with
securing additional financing.
Staff has begun collaborating with West Valley jurisdictions
to create an annual joint outreach event to connect
developers with owners of nonvacant sites and advertise new
housing opportunities under new zoning regulations. In
2024, outreach began for the first event which is tentatively
scheduled to take place in February 2025 to advertise the site
at 20140 Stevens Creek Blvd. More nonvacant sites will be
promoted in future events.
Strategy HE‐
1.3.5
ENCOURAGE MIXED‐
USE PROJECTS AND
RESIDENTIAL IN
COMMERCIAL
ZONES
The City will incentivize development of residential units in mixed‐use projects that include affordable
units (at least 20 percent), by providing incentives, which will include, but are not limited to: ● Priority
project processing ● Delay payment of development impact or permit fees for affordable units ● Flexibility
in development standards, such as parking, setbacks, and landscaping requirements ● Support grant
application requests for funding made by developers for infrastructure upgrades. ● Assist developers of
100 percent affordable housing developments with securing additional financing.
Promotion of missing mixed use zoning changes will take
place during the first annual West Valley developer outreach
event, which is tentatively scheduled to take place in
February 2025. More sites that have high opportunitiy for
mixed‐use development will be promoted in future events.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con43
PC 2-25-2025
43 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
Strategy HE‐
1.3.6
ENCOURAGE
MISSING‐MIDDLE
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENTS TO
AFFIRMATIVELY
FURTHER FAIR
HOUSING
The City will encourage the development of missing‐middle housing types that are affordable by design
that can provide opportunities for housing that can accommodate the needs, preferences, and financial
capabilities of current and future residents in terms of different housing types, tenures, density, sizes, and
costs. Missing middle housing is typically multiple rental units on a single parcel (whether attached or
detached) that are compatible in scale and form with traditional single‐family homes with one‐ or two‐
story forms. Examples include duplexes, triplexes, courtyard apartments. Allowing the development of
units in this form will help the incorporation of rental housing within the existing, primarily single‐family
ownership units within neighborhoods. The City will accomplish this by: ● Allowing corner lots in R1
zoning districts to develop as multi‐family rental housing using R2 zoning regulations to encourage
missingmiddle developments. ● Allowing lots zoned for singlefamily residential uses that abut (either
shares a property line or is directly across the street from) property that fronts an arterial or major collector
and is zoned and used for commercial or mixeduse development, to develop with rental multi‐family
housing using R2 zoning regulations to encourage missing middle housing. ● Pursuing the establishment
of maximum average unit size as a tool to moderate unit sizes for such developments. The City will
promote the missing middle strategy through City publications and online newsletters, and via the City’s
website
New zoning development standards were approved through
a public hearing before the City Council in July 2024.
(Resolution 24‐039, Ordinance 24‐2262, Ordinance 24‐2261).
Promotion of missing middle housing zoning changes will
take place during the first annual West Valley developer
outreach event, which is tentatively scheduled to take place
in February 2025.
STRATEGY HE‐
1.3.7
LOT
CONSOLIDATION
The City will help facilitate lot consolidations to combine small residential lots (lots 0.5 acres or smaller)
into larger developable lots. The City will continue the following actions to accomplish this: ● Facilitate
and approve lot consolidation when contiguous smaller, underutilized parcels are to be redeveloped. ●
Encourage master plans for such sites with coordinated access and circulation. ● Provide technical
assistance to property owners of adjacent parcels to facilitate coordinated redevelopment where
appropriate. ● Facilitate intra‐ and interagency cooperation in working with applicants at no cost prior to
application submittal for assistance with preliminary plan review. ● Provide information on the City’s
website about development opportunities and incentives for lot consolidation to accommodate affordable
housing units and discuss these opportunities and incentives with interested developers. As
developers/owners interested in lot consolidation and the development of affordable housing projects on
small lots approach the City, the City will offer the following incentives: » Allow affordable projects to
exceed the maximum height limits, » Reduce setbacks, » Reduce parking requirements, and/or » Offset fees
(when financially feasible) and offer concurrent/ fast tracking of project application reviews to developers
who provide 100 percent affordable housing.
Incentives for lot consolidated will be identified by
December 2025 and offered by December 2026. Promotion of
lot consolidation zoning changes will take place during the
first annual West Valley developer outreach event, which is
tentatively scheduled to take place in February 2025.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con44
PC 2-25-2025
44 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
AVAILABILITY OF
HOUSING
STRATEGY HE‐
1.3.8:
ACCESSORY
DWELLING UNITS
The City will encourage the construction of accessory dwelling units (ADUs) throughout the city through
the following actions, which are aimed at providing an increased supply of units affordable to very low,
low, and moderateincome households and therefore provide affordable housing in high opportunity
neighborhoods and help reduce displacement risk for lowincome households resulting from overpayment:
● Amend the municipal code to be consistent with the latest State legislation related to ADUs, in
accordance with California Government Code Sections 65852.2 et seq. ● Continue to provide guidance and
educational materials for building ADUs on the City’s website, including permitting procedures.
Additionally, the City will biennially present homeowner associations with information about the
community and neighborhood benefits of ADUs, and inform them that covenants, conditions, and
restrictions (CC&Rs) prohibiting ADUs are contrary to State law. ● To increase mobility for lower income
households, proactively advertise the benefits of ADUs by distributing multilingual informational
materials in areas of high opportunity and a limited number of renter households, including the Monta
Vista North and Oak Valley neighborhoods, to increase mobility for low‐income households by posting
flyers in community gathering places and providing information to community groups and homeowners’
associations at least annually. ● Continue to offer the pre‐approved ADU program and post links to
approved plans as available. ● Annually monitor ADU production and affordability as a part of the
Annual Progress Report process and adjust or expand the focus of the education and outreach efforts. ●
Apply annually, if grants are available, for funding to provide incentives, for homeowners to construct
ADUs affordable to very low, low, and moderate‐income tenants. ● Permit up to a maximum of three, 800
s.f. attached or detached ADUs, JADUs, or conversion ADUs on all single family zoned properties and a
maximum of up to two 800 s.f. attached or detached ADUs, JADUs or conversion ADUs on all duplex
zoned properties, which is in excess of the number of ADUs allowed under state law. ● Identify incentives
for construction of affordable ADUs with new development, which may include deferring collection of
impact fees for the square footage associated with the ADU until issuance of the certificate of occupancy.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. The City continued to encourage the
production of second units. In 2023, the City issued 50 building
permits for ADUs ‐ this is approximately 33% of the total
number of ADU building permits issued during the entire 5th
Cycle. The ordinance is regularly updated to comply with state
law. In 2021, the City developed a pre‐approved ADU
program to further incentive the creation of ADUs. One
property has utilitzed the pre‐approved ADU program since
then. New zoning development standards were approved
through a public hearing before the City Council in July
2024. (Ordinance 24‐2262, Ordinance 24‐2261). The City of
Cupertino has joined a regional effort in Santa Clara County
to use a new survey to collect rent data on new ADUs built to
determine affordability. The survey has been posted to the
website and is active as of January 2025. The pre‐approved
ADU program continues to be offerred and the program will
be monitored as part of the APR. Incentives will be explored
by June 2025. Grants will be applied to to provide as ADU
production incentives as opportunities become available. In
2024, 41 ADU building permits were issued and 46 ADUs
received certificates of occupancy.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con45
PC 2-25-2025
45 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
AVAILABILITY OF
HOUSING
Strategy HE‐
1.3.9
REVIEW
DEVELOPMENT
STANDARDS
The City recognizes the need to encourage a range of housing options in the community. The City will
review and revise its zoning code to: ● Review and revise design and development standards (setbacks,
height limits, lot coverage, etc.) and guidelines for multifamily housing, specifically in the R4 Zone and the
Priority Development Area (PDA) to ensure standards are objective and that maximum densities can be
achieved. ● Provide flexibility in development standards to accommodate new models and approaches to
providing housing, such as live/ work housing to allow housing to adapt to the needs of occupants. ● Offer
flexible residential development standards in planned residential zoning districts, such as smaller lot sizes,
lot widths, setbacks, and higher floor‐area ratios particularly for higherdensity and attached housing
developments. ● Consider granting reductions in off‐street parking for senior housing. Analyze local
parking standards compared to those of neighboring jurisdictions with similar characteristics and reduce
parking standards to ensure parking is not a constraint on development. Specifically, reduce parking
requirements for studio apartments, senior housing, and single‐room occupancy (SRO) units and others as
required by the analysis.
● Require implementation of universal design standards for new multifamily development to provide
disabled access. These standards would require the adoption of features like at least one “no‐step” entry
point, interior and exterior doors with 32 inches of clear passage, and one bathroom on the main floor that
is able to be maneuvered in a wheelchair. Encourage the implementation of universal design standards for
new single‐family homes.
● Remove the following bolded text from the major development permit findings. The proposed housing
developments and/or use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or
convenience.
Community
Development – Planning None Required IM
New zoning development standards were approved through
a public hearing before the City Council in July 2024.
(Resolution 24‐039, Ordinance 24‐2262, Ordinance 24‐2261).
On May 2024, The City entered into a contract with the
consultant, PlaceWorks, to draft and implement objective
design standards. After implementation, the policy will be
annually reviewed for effectiveness through the APR.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con46
PC 2-25-2025
46 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
Strategy HE‐
1.3.10
INNOVATIVE AND
FAMILY‐FRIENDLY
HOUSING OPTIONS
Explore innovative and alternative housing options that provide greater flexibility and affordability in the
housing stock that would address housing needs for intergenerational households, students, special‐needs
groups, and lower‐income households. The City will implement the following: ● Promote housing designs
and unit mix to attract multigenerational households by encouraging housing features and more bedrooms
(including four‐bedroom units), as well as other on‐site amenities, such as usable outdoor open space for
multigenerational use to promote place‐based revitalization, and multipurpose rooms that can be used for
after‐school homework clubs, computer, art, or other resident activities. Facilitate at least one partnership
with social service organizations to provide programming in community spaces within a 100 percent
affordable project during the planning period. ● Research the possibility of a Home Sharing program that
would help to match “providers” with a spare room or rooms with “seekers” who are looking for an
affordable place to live. This could either be done at a countywide level or the City could consider
partnering with De Anza Community College to facilitate a home‐sharing program to account for the high
number of empty rooms across Cupertino’s single‐family home supply. If the program is determined to be
feasible, implement within one year of feasibility determination. Priority outreach for program
implementation will focus on the city’s lower‐density neighborhoods including, but not limited to,
Ranchonada, Fair Grove, Monta Vista North, and Inspiration Heights. The City will use the findings of this
program to target development of a variety of housing types in areas of concentrated overpayment to
reduce displacement risk as well as promote inclusion and support integration of housing types based on
income to facilitate mobility opportunities in high resource areas and areas of high median income.
New zoning development standards were approved through
a public hearing before the City Council in July 2024.
(Resolution 24‐039, Ordinance 24‐2262, Ordinance 24‐2261).
Staff will reach out to HIP Housing to explore the possibility
of expanding the Homesharing Program to Santa Clara
County (or just the City of Cupertino) by December 2025.
Strategy HE‐
1.3.11
REPLACEMENT
HOUSING
To facilitate place‐based revitalization for households at risk of displacement due to new development,
the City will require replacement housing units subject to the requirements of Government Code, Sections
66300.5, 65583.2, and 65915(c)(3), on all sites in the City when any new development (residential, mixed‐
use, or nonresidential) occurs on a site that has been occupied by or restricted for the use of lower‐income
households at any time during the previous five years. This requirement applies to nonvacant sites and
vacant sites with previous residential uses that have been vacated or demolished.
Staff will continue to monitor development projects to
ensure that replacement units are required when residential
units are demolished. Ongoing.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con47
PC 2-25-2025
47 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
Strategy HE‐
1.3.12
TRACK HOUSING
PRODUCTION
The City will monitor housing production throughout the planning period and ensure the Pipeline
Projects (Table B4‐2) and sites identified to meet the RHNA (Tables B4‐7 and B4‐9) maintain sufficient
housing capacity to meet the RHNA target by income level. The city will not adopt reductions in allowable
residential densities for Pipeline Projects in the Appendix B4 through General Plan update/amendment or
rezone or approve development or building permits for sites identified in the inventory with fewer units or
affordable to a different income category than identified in the inventory, unless findings are made that the
remaining capacity is sufficient to accommodate remaining unmet RHNA for each income level. The City
will track and report on: ● Pipeline projects (Table B4‐2) and progress towards completion; ● Unit count
and income/affordability assumed on parcels in the sites inventory (Tables B4‐7 and B4‐9); ● Actual
number of units permitted and constructed by income/affordability; ● Net change in capacity and
summary of remaining capacity by income level in meeting remaining RHNA; In accordance with No Net
Loss law, if project approval results in the remaining sites capacity becoming inadequate to accommodate
RHNA by income category, the City will identify or rezone sufficient sites to accommodate the shortfall
within 180 days of approval. Further, the City will track progress of pending projects towards completion
and if projects are not assumed to be completed in the planning period, the City will evaluate whether
there are sufficient sites available to accommodate the RHNA. If sufficient sites are not available, the City
will take necessary actions (e.g., rezoning or identify additional sites) to maintain adequate sites within one
year. The results of the tracking will be reported in the Housing Element Annual Progress Report reported
annually to the City Council and posted online for public review.
Staff will continue to monitor development projects to
ensure that they are built to unit and income levels as
proposed in the housing element in accordance with No Net
Loss Law. Ongoing.
Strategy HE‐
1.3.13
HOUSING ELEMENT
MONITORING AND
GENERAL PLAN
CONSISTENCY
As required by State law, the City will review the status of Housing Element programs annually. Annual
review will cover consistency between the Housing Element and the other General Plan Elements. As
portions of the General Plan are amended, the Housing Element will be reviewed and revised to ensure
that internal consistency is maintained.
Staff will continue to review elements of the General Plan to
ensure their internal consistency, including the Housing
Element. Ongoing.
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY Strategy HE‐2.1 HOUSING
MITIGATION
Ensure that all new developments, including market‐rate residential developments, help mitigate
projectrelated impacts on affordable housing needs.
Community
Development – Planning BMR AHF Con.
Not an action item. Implemented via Municipal Code and
BMR Manual. Not an action item, however, staff will
continue to ensure that all new development mitigate project
related impacts on affordable housing needs through the
application review process and collection of related fees.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con48
PC 2-25-2025
48 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY Policy HE‐2.2 RANGE OF HOUSING
TYPES
Encourage the development of diverse housing stock that provides a range of housing types (including
smaller, moderate‐cost housing) and affordability levels. Emphasize the provision of housing for lowerand
moderate‐income households, including wage earners who provide essential public services (e.g., school
district employees, municipal and public safety employees, etc.)
Community
Development – Housing BMR AHF Con.
Staff will continue to encourage the development of housing
at all affordability levels through the release of an annual
BMR notice of funding availability and through enforcement
of the inclusionary housing policy of the Housing Mitigation
Manual during the application review process. In 2024, staff
continues to review the application for the Vallo/The Rise
project, which is projected to produce 2,669 units, with 134
very‐low income units and 756 low income units.
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY Policy HE‐2.3
DEVELOPMENT OF
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING AND
HOUSING FOR
PERSONS WITH
SPECIAL NEEDS
Make every reasonable effort to disperse affordable units throughout the community but not at the
expense of undermining the fundamental goal of providing affordable units. Ensure that the City’s
development standards accommodate housing needed by persons with special needs.
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
BMR AHF IM
Staff will continue to annual publish a Request for Proposals
for the Below Market Rate Affordable Housing Funds and
will review applications to ensure that they meet the fund
guidelines and further the Cityʹs affordable housing goals.
Approximately $4.8 million have been made available.
Projects which include ELI units or are geographically
located in areas with low percentages of renter‐occupied
households or areas with high rates of cost burden will be
prioritized. In 2024, this NOFA was released in November
and has recieved two applications: the Mary Ave Affordable
housing project, which is planned to produce 40 units, with
19 very low‐income units, 20 extremely low‐income units,
and 1 manager unit. Within the affordable unit mix, 19 units
will be reserved for individuals with intellectual or
developmental disabilities; and the Wolf Rd Educator
housing project, with is planned to produce 249 units built
across two phases. The first phase will contain 101 units of
mixed‐income housing for school district employees, will
contain approximately 34 low income units and 67 moderate
income units. The second phase will contain 148 units, with
60 very low‐income units, 86 low‐income units, and 2
manager units. Ongoing.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con49
PC 2-25-2025
49 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
Strategy HE‐
2.3.1
SUPPORT
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
Community
Development ‐ Planning
and Housing
BMR AHF
Work with housing developers to expand opportunities for affordable lower‐income housing for
specialneeds groups, including persons with physical and developmental disabilities, female‐headed
households, large families, extremely low‐income households, and persons experiencing homelessness by
creating partnerships, providing incentives, and pursuing funding opportunities.
● Prioritize projects that are in areas with currently low percentages of renter‐occupied households to
facilitate housing mobility and integration of ownership and rental units, including the Monta Vista North
neighborhood. Additionally, prioritize projects in areas with high rates of housing cost burden, such as the
city’s north side (in and in proximity of the Homestead Special Area).
● Support affordable housing development and give priority to permit processing for projects providing
100 percent affordable housing for special‐needs groups throughout the city, including in areas that are
predominantly
single‐family residential. The target populations include seniors; persons with disabilities, including
developmental disabilities; femaleheaded households; and persons experiencing homelessness to reduce
the displacement risk for these residents from their existing homes and communities.
● Promote the use of the density bonus ordinance, application process streamlining, fee deferrals, and
consider development fee exemption for projects that are 100 percent affordable to encourage affordable
housing, with an emphasis on encouraging affordable housing in high‐resource areas and areas with
limited rental opportunities currently.
● Facilitate the approval process for land divisions, lot line adjustments, and/or specific plans or master
plans resulting in parcel sizes that enable 50 percent (of the total number of units) affordable housing
development and process fee deferrals related to the subdivision for 50 percent (of the total number of
units) affordable projects.
● Work with public or private sponsors to identify candidates for new construction of housing for special
needs, including transitional and supportive households, and take all actions necessary to expedite
processing of such projects.
● Encourage residential development near transit routes, civic uses, social services, grocery stores, parks,
open space, and other health resources. Partner with nonprofit and for‐profit affordable housing
developers to support their financing applications for State and federal grant programs, tax‐exempt bonds,
and other programs that become available.
● Pursue federal, State, and private funding for low‐ and moderateincome housing by applying for State
and federal monies for direct support of lower‐income housing construction and rehabilitation, specifically
for development of housing affordable to extremely low‐income households.
Staff will continue to review and prioritize the development
of affordable housing as opportunities become available. In
2024, no projects were ready to receive state/federal
assistance, however, staff identified the PLHA and
HomeKey+ grants as potential sources for the future Mary
Ave Affordable Housing Project. Ongoing.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con50
PC 2-25-2025
50 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.2
OFFICE AND
INDUSTRIAL
HOUSING
MITIGATION
PROGRAM
The City will continue to implement the Office and Industrial Housing Mitigation Program. This program
requires that developers of office, commercial, and industrial space pay a mitigation fee, which will then
be used to support affordable housing in Cupertino. These mitigation fees are collected and deposited in
the City’s Below Market‐Rate Affordable Housing Fund (BMR AHF).
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
BMR AHF IM
Housing Mitigation Manual updated in May 2024, to require
BMR units with projects over 5 units. The City requires
developers of office, commercial, and industrial space to pay a
mitigation fee to support affordable housing. Mitigated fees
are collected and deposited into the Cityʹs BMR Affordable
Housing Fund (AHF) for the following fiscal years (FY) the
following mitigation fees were collected and deposited and in
the BMR AFH fund. In 2023, there was $175,873.48 in BMR
AHF funds collected. In 2024, no funds were collected in
BMR AHF funds from the Office and Industrial Housing
Mitigation Program. Staff will continue to collect mitigation
fees to add to the Cityʹs Below Market Rate Affordable
Housing Fund as development projects are submitted.
Ongoing.
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
The City will continue to implement the Residential Housing Mitigation Program to mitigate the need for
affordable housing created by new market‐rate residential development. This program applies to new
residential development. Mitigation includes either the payment of the “Housing Mitigation” fee or the
provision of a Below Market‐Rate (BMR) unit or units. Projects of five or more for‐sale units must provide
on‐site BMR units. Projects of four units or fewer for‐sale units can either build one BMR unit or pay the
Housing Mitigation fee. Developers of marketrate rental units, where the units cannot be sold individually,
must pay the Housing Mitigation fee to the BMR AHF. The BMR program specifies the following: ●
Priority. To the extent permitted by law, priority for occupancy is given to Cupertino residents, Cupertino
full‐time employees, and Cupertino public service employees, as defined in Cupertino’s Residential
Housing Mitigation Manual. ● For‐Sale Residential Developments. Require 20 percent for‐sale BMR units
in all residential developments where the units can be sold individually (including single‐family homes,
BMR AHFRESIDENTIAL
HOUSING
MITIGATION
PROGRAM
Strategy HE‐
2.3.3
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
Ongoing. The City has not heard any concerns about its BMR
program being a constraint to development at this time and
is not required to prepare an economic feasibility report.
Con
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con51
PC 2-25-2025
51 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.4
BELOW‐MARKET
RATE (BMR)
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING FUND
(AHF)
common interest developments, and condominium conversions) or allow rental BMR units.
● Rental Residential Developments. Require 15 percent l very low‐ and low‐income BMR units in all rental
residential developments.
● Rental Alternative. Allow rental BMR units in for‐sale residential
developments and allow developers of market‐rate rental developments to provide on‐site rental BMR
units, if the developer: (1) enters into an agreement limiting rents in exchange for a financial contribution
or a type of assistance specified in density bonus law (which includes a variety of regulatory relief); and (2)
provides very low‐income and low‐income BMR rental units.
● Affordable Prices and Rents. Continue to implement guidelines
for affordable sales prices and affordable rents for new affordable
housing and update the guidelines each year as new income guidelines are received.
● Development of BMR Units Off Site. Allow developers to meet all
or a portion of their BMR or Housing Mitigation fee requirement by
making land available for the City or a nonprofit housing developer
to construct affordable housing or allow developers to construct
the required BMR units off site, in partnership with a nonprofit. The
criteria for land donation or off‐site BMR units (or combination of the two options) will be identified in the
Residential Housing Mitigation Manual.
● BMR Te r m. Require BMR units to remain affordable for a minimum
of 99 years; enforce the City’s first right of refusal for BMR units and
other means to ensure that BMR units remain affordable.
Mit th ff dbl f l itb ii BMR
The City’s BMR AHF will continue to support affordable housing projects, strategies, and services,
including, but not limited to:
● BMR Program Administration
● Substantial rehabilitation
● Land acquisition
● Acquisition and/or rehabilitation of buildings for permanent affordability
● New construction
● Preserving “at‐risk” BMR units
Staff will continue to annually publish a Request for
Proposals for the Below Market Rate Affordable Housing
Funds and will review applications to ensure that they meet
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con52
PC 2-25-2025
52 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.5
HOUSING
RESOURCES
Cupertino residents and developers interested in providing affordable housing in the city have access to a
variety of resources administered by other agencies. The City will continue to provide information on
housing resources and services offered by the County and other outside agencies. These include, but are
not limited to: ● Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) – Santa Clara County Housing and Community
Development Department. ● First‐Time Homebuyer Assistance and Developer Loans for Multifamily
Development ‐ Housing Trust Silicon Valley (HTSV). ● Housing Choice Vouchers (Section 8) ‐ Housing
Authority of Santa Clara County (HASCC). ● Affordable housing development ‐ Santa Clara County
HOME Consortium.
The City will also continue to identify and pursue various affordable housing resources available at the
local, regional, state, and federal levels that could be used to address housing needs in the community.
Outreach on these programs will be conducted citywide, but extra focus will be given to areas with
historically higher areas of income segregation, such as the areas along the Interstate (I‐)280 corridor, in the
areas abutting the intersection of Highway 85 and Stevens Creek Boulevard, along N. Foothill Boulevard
(western edge of the Creston‐Pharlap neighborhood), and along Miller Avenue, north of Creekside Park.
Community
Development – Housing None Required Con.
Information and technical assistance continues to be provided
by City Staff and Rise Housing Solution, BMR program
administrator. Staff will continue to research and pursue
housing funds from federal, state, and regional sources to
support affordable housing and provide relevant
information to residents through the City website as projects
become available. Ongoing.
● Rental operating subsidies
● Down payment assistance
● Direct gap financing
● Fair housing
The City will target a portion of the BMR AHF to benefit extremely lowincome households and persons
with special needs (such as the elderly, victims of domestic violence, and the disabled, including persons
with developmental disabilities), to the extent that these target populations are found to be consistent with
the needs identified in the nexus study the City prepares to identify the connection, or “nexus” between
new developments and the need
for affordable housing. Additionally, development of housing for lowerincome households will be
facilitated citywide, but priority will be given to areas with currently low percentages of renter‐occupied
households to facilitate housing mobility and integration of ownership and rental units, including the
Monta Vista North neighborhood. Additionally, priority will also be given to areas with high rates of cost
burden, such as the city’s north side (in and in proximity of the Homestead Special Area).
Funds and will review applications to ensure that they meet
the fund guidelines and further the Cityʹs affordable housing
goals. Projects which include ELI units or are geographically
located in areas with low percentages of renter‐occupied
households or areas with high rates of cost burden will be
prioritized, as identified in the Housing Element. In 2024,
this NOFA was released in November. Applications will be
reviewed and recommendations made to the Council by
Spring 2025. Ongoing.
Community
Development – Housing BMR AHF IM
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con53
PC 2-25-2025
53 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.5
SURPLUS
PROPERTIES FOR
HOUSING AND
FAITHBASED
HOUSING
The City will partner with local developers or organizations to purchase surplus properties, infill lots, and
other green fields within the city to use for the development of affordable housing. Encourage mixeduse
development (i.e., retail on ground floor with residential on the upper levels) as a pull factor for
individuals to live in the new development as follows: ● Work with local public agencies, school districts,
and churches to identify surplus properties or underutilized properties that have the potential for
residential development. ● Compile and maintain an inventory of vacant properties owned by the City or
other public entities. The inventory will include land donated and accepted by the City for donation, and
land otherwise acquired by the city. The City will then undertake steps leading to release of RFP to solicit
developer interest, which may include declaration of land as ‘surplus’. The City will publicize the
inventory, post it on the website, make it available to nonprofit developers, and prioritize affordable
housing on these sites in accordance wit the Surplus Lands Act (Government Code sections 54220‐
54234).To create housing mobility opportunities for lower‐income households, conduct outreach to
religious institutions to inform them of their development rights under SB 4 and encourage housing
proposals within one year of Housing Element adoption. If no application for housing on a religious
institution/faith‐based site is received within twelve months after outreach is completed, the City will
expand outreach efforts to be conducted annually. This will include direct mailings to faith‐based sites
highlighting successful affordable housing units on other faith‐based sites, as well as available City
resources and programs to support such projects if available. Additional outreach focus will be given to
religious institutions located in lower‐density neighborhoods to promote housing mobility in these areas. ●
Encourage long‐term land leases of properties from churches, school districts, and corporations for
construction of affordable units. ● Evaluate the feasibility of developing special housing for teachers or
other employee groups on the surplus properties. ● Research other jurisdictions’ housing programs for
teachers for their potential applicability in Cupertino.
Community
Development – Housing BMR AHF Con.
The City worked with local public agencies, school districts,
and churches to identify surplus properties that have the
potential for residential development during the Housing
Element update between 2021 and 2023. There were no
surplus properties available from any school districts for the
City to pursue. The City continued to support the Rotating
Safe Car Park (RSCP) program on church property. The City
has seen an interest from St. Judeʹs Church for a development
of a portion of their property with affordable housing. The City
has rezoned this property to accommodate the development
that they envision as part of the 6th Cycle Housing Element
update. Staff will maintain a list of surplus City properties
that will updated annually in accordance with Table H of the
APR. Staff will resume outreach to other faith based
organizations in 2025.
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.7
INCENTIVES FOR
AFFORDABLE
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
The City will continue to offer a range of incentives to facilitate the development of affordable housing.
These include: ● Financial assistance through the City’s Below‐Market Rate Affordable Housing Fund
(BMR AHF) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds. ● Partner with CDBG and/or
support the funding application of qualified affordable housing developers for regional, state, and federal
affordable housing funds, including HOME funds, Low‐Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC), and
mortgage revenue bonds. ● Density bonus incentives (see Strategy HE‐2.3.8). ● Flexible development
standards ● Technical assistance. ● Waiver of park dedication fees and construction tax. ● Parking
ordinance waivers. ● Expedited permit processing. Development of housing for lowerincome households
will be facilitated citywide, but extra focus will be given to areas with currently low percentages of renter‐
occupied households to facilitate housing mobility and integration of ownership and rental units,
including the Monta Vista North neighborhood Additionally, focus will be given to areas with high rates
of housing cost burden, such as the city’s north side (in and in proximi
Community
Development – Housing
and Planning
BMR AHF,
CDBG; HOME;
General Fund
Con.
Staff will continue to publish RFPs for affordable housing
funds and annaully review incentives provided to encourage
affordable housing development. Projects which include ELI
units or are geographically located in areas with low
percentages of renter‐occupied households or areas with
high rates of cost burden will be prioritized. Ongoing.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con54
PC 2-25-2025
54 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.8
DENSITY BONUS
ORDINANCE
The City will continue to review and revise the Zoning Code to be consistent with State density bonus
law. Although most housing developers are familiar with density bonus law and frequently request
bonuses, concessions, waivers, and parking reductions, the city will provide available guidelines and other
information to developers regarding the statute. The City currently allows a 100% bonus for all affordable
housing developments.
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
None Required Con.
Every housing development with more than 5 units has
utilitzed Density Bonus, waivers, incentives and parking
reductions in some capacity. Staff will continue to review and
revise the zoning code to be consistent with State density
bonus law. Ongoing.
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.9
REVIEW IMPACT
FEES
To ensure that impact fees are not a constraint on the development of housing, the City will: ● Review and
revise impact fees by researching surrounding jurisdictions to determine other possible fee structures,
grant funding opportunities and similar funding sources, review of average persons per unit at higher
densities of development and will consider: » Alternatives, such as privately owned, publicly accessible
(POPA) areas, or allowing parkland credit for pedestrian connections and trails. » Incorporating priority
processing, granting fee waivers or deferrals for 100 percent affordable projects, and modifying
development standards,
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG; HOME Con.
Staff already grants impact fee and construction tax waivers
for all affordable units (whether the development is 100%
affordable or not). It is the Cityʹs policy to continue to
prioritize 100% affordable houring projects. All 100%
affordable housing projects are eligible for state density
bonus waivers, which allow the waivers of ALL development
standards. Additionally, many parts of the City allow
unlimited density due to proximity to major transity stops.
Therefore, almost no development standards apply to such
projects nor are such projects subject to the payment of any
parkland fees in lieu of dedication. For projects which are
not 100% affordable, the City will review parkland fees in
lieu of dedication in 2025 to consider credit for public
pedestrian connections or trails on the property and/or POPA
areas or other alternatives.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con55
PC 2-25-2025
55 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.10
EXTREMELY
LOWINCOME
HOUSING
The City will continue to encourage the development of adequate housing to meet the needs of extremely
lowincome households particularly for seniors, victims of domestic violence, and persons with disabilities
(including persons with developmental disabilities), through a variety of actions. The development of
housing for extremely low‐income households will be facilitated citywide, but priority will be given to
areas with currently low percentages of renter‐occupied households to facilitate housing mobility and
integration of ownership and rental units, including the Monta Vista North neighborhood. Additionally,
priority will be given to areas with high rates of housing cost burden, such as the city’s north side.●
Provide financing assistance using the Below‐Market Rate Affordable Housing Fund (BMR AHF) and
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds.
● Review available State and Federal NOFAs on an annual basis and support funding applications for
affordable housing projects as funding becomes available.
● Adopt a priority processing procedure for projects with extremely low‐income units within one year of
Housing Element adoption.
● Grant reductions in off‐street parking as required by density bonus law and other state statutes.
● Expand regulatory incentives for the development of units affordable to extremely lowincome
households and housing for special‐needs groups, including persons with disabilities (including
developmental disabilities), and
individuals and families in need of emergency/transitional housing.
The City will work with developers and evaluate additional proposed development standards reductions
for projects that include housing for extremely low‐income households, and will present findings and
proposed code amendments to the Planning Commission and CityCouncil for adoption within nine
months of identified findings.
● Partner with and/or support the funding application of qualified affordable housing developers for
regional, state, and federal affordable housing funds, including HOME funds, Low‐Income Housing Tax
Credits (LIHTC), and mortgage revenue bond.● Amend the Zoning Code to define single‐room occupancy
(SRO) units and allow them in the R4 zoning districts with a use permit, in
compliance with Government Code Section 65583(c)(1).
New zoning development standards were adopted in July
2024 to address SROs and processing. (Ordinance 24‐2262,
Ordinance 24‐2261). The NOFA for the Cityʹs BMR AHF fund
was issued in November 2024. All projects which include ELI
units will be prioritized as identified in the Housing
Element. Processing for projects with affordable units are
streamlined and codified in the zoning code. The City
anticipates hosting a developer outreach event in early 2025
in partnership with other cities to promote the use of
development incentives for projects which contain ELI units,
such as Density Bonus waivers and concessions. The City
also anticipates offering support for qualifying funding
applications. It is anticipated an opportunity site with
proximity to services, including West Valley Community
Services, which is well suited for ELI units, will be
promoted.
Community
Development – Planning None Required IM
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con56
PC 2-25-2025
56 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.11
ASSISTANCE FOR
PERSONS WITH
DEVELOPMENTAL
DISABILITIES
To increase housing mobility opportunities and support persons with developmental disabilities, the City
will: ● Provide referrals to the San Andreas Regional Center to inform families with persons with
developmental disabilities of the resources available to them. ● Continue to support the development of
small group homes that serve developmentally disabled adults; adopt a policy to establish priority
processing and offer fee waivers or deferrals within one year of Housing Element adoption. ● Work with
the nonprofit community to encourage the inclusion of units for persons with developmental disabilities in
future affordable housing developments. ● Encourage housing providers to pursue funding sources
designated for persons with special needs and disabilities and notify housing providers of available
funding opportunities as they become available. Offer technical assistance to project developers on
funding applications. ● Encourage housing providers to designate a portion of new affordable housing
developments for persons with disabilities, including persons with developmental disabilities, to increase
housing mobility opportunities and pursue funding sources designated for persons with special needs and
disabilities
Community
Development ‐ Housing None Required IM
The City anticipates hosting a developer outreach event in
early 2025 in partnership with other cities to promote the use
of development incentives for projects which contain IDD
units, such as Density Bonus waivers and concessions. The
City also anticipates offering support for qualifying grant
funding applications. It is anticipated an opportunity site
with proximity to services, including West Valley
Community Services, which is well suited for IDD units,
will be promoted. Outreach for the event began December
2024. The City continues to support and encourage the
development of housing for persons with developmental
disabilities through the Mary Ave Affordable Housing
project, which will contain 19 units for IDD households. In
2024, staff has continuously met with the developer,
Charities Housing, and committed funding to the
predevelopment of anticipated affordable housing projects
such as Mary Ave and Simeon (Eden Hosuing) in 2021 and
reaffirmed the commitment in 2024.
HOUSING
AFFORDABILITY
Strategy HE‐
2.3.12 LIVE/WORK UNITS
Encourage the development or conversion of affordable live/ workspace units to reduce displacement of
residents and employees, specifically when replacing older strip mall type developments along busier
streets (e.g., S. De Anza Boulevard and Stevens Creek Boulevard) to preserve the more urban and mixed‐
use character of the street. This would allow the street frontage to remain commercial use while the
residential portion of the units would be located towards the rear of the site or in upper floors. The City
will also help to market the Homeownership Assistance Programs offered by Housing Trust Silicon Valley
(HTSV) in an effort to expand affordable homeownership options.
Staff will conduct outreach to commercial property owners in
2025. The City will continue to help advertise
Homeownership Assistance Programs offered by HTSV
through the City website.
MAINTAINING
EXISTING HOUSING
STOCK
Policy HE‐3.1 HOUSING
REHABILITATION
Pursue and/or provide funding for the acquisition/rehabilitation of housing that is affordable to very low‐,
low‐, and moderate‐income households. Actively support and assist nonprofit and for‐profit developers in
producing affordable units.
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG; HOME Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to release an
annual notice of funding availability for both local BMR
funds as well as federal CDBG funds, and make available
HOME, as well as state PLHA funds, to provide funding to
maintain existing affordable housing stock.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con57
PC 2-25-2025
57 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
MAINTAINING
EXISTING HOUSING
STOCK
Policy HE‐3.2 MAINTENANCE AND
REPAIR
Assist lower‐income homeowners and rental property owners in maintaining and repairing their housing
units.
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG; HOME Con.
Not an action item. In 2024, CDBG funds were provided to
the non‐profit organization, Rebuilding Together Silicon
Valley, in the amount of $92,536 to provide rehabilitation
services to low‐income homeowners in the City of Cupertino,
which served 9 households.
MAINTAINING
EXISTING HOUSING
STOCK
Policy HE‐3.3 CONSERVATION OF
HOUSING STOCK
The City’s existing multifamily units provide opportunities for households of varied income levels.
Preserve existing multifamily housing stock, including existing duplexes, triplexes, and fourplexes, by
preventing the net loss of multifamily housing units upon remodeling, with new development and the
existing inventory of affordable housing units that are at risk of converting to market‐rate housing.
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG; HOME Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to make
funding available for the conservation of affordable housing
units at risk of converting to market rate housing through
using BMR, CDBG, HOME, and PLHA programs through
deed restriction via rehabilitation and conversion.
MAINTAINING
EXISTING HOUSING
STOCK
Strategy HE‐
3.3.1 STRATEGY HE‐3
3.1: RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION. THE CITY WILL CONTINUE TO: ● Use its Below‐Market Rate
Affordable Housing Fund (BMR AHF) and Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to
support residential rehabilitation efforts in the community. These include: » Acquisition/rehabilitation of
rental housing. » Rehabilitation of owner‐occupied housing.● Provide assistance for home safety repairs
and mobility/accessibility improvements to income‐qualified owner‐occupants using CDBG funds. The
focus of this strategy is on the correction of safety hazards.
● Partner with and/or support the funding application of qualified affordable housing developers for
regional, state, and federal affordable housing funds, including HOME funds, Low‐Income Housing Tax
Credits (LIHTC), and mortgage
revenue bonds
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG; HOME Con.
Not an action item. Staff will continue to support residential
rehabilitation of low‐income homes in partnership with
Rebuilding Together Silicon Valley through financial support
in the CDBG program. In 2024, $92,536 was provided to this
program and 9 households were served. Ongoing.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con58
PC 2-25-2025
58 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
MAINTAINING
EXISTING HOUSING
STOCK
Strategy HE‐
3.3.2
PRESERVATION OF
AT‐RISK HOUSING
UNITS
Beardon Drive (8 units), WVCS Transitional Housing (4 units), and Sunny View West (100 units), as well
as several below‐market rate (BMR) units are considered at risk of converting to market‐rate housing in the
next 10 years. For units at risk of converting to market rate, the City shall: ● Contact property owners of
units at risk of converting to marketrate housing three years before affordability expiration to discuss the
City’s commitment to preserve these units as affordable housing. ● Coordinate with owners of expiring
subsidies to ensure the required notices to tenants and to affordable housing developers are sent out at 3
years, 12 months, and 6 months or otherwise as required by state law. ● Reach out to agencies and to
nonprofit housing developers interested in purchasing or otherwise preserving at‐risk units. ● Work with
tenants and other organizations to reduce displacement and refer residents to an agency that can assist in
providing alternative housing, if preservation is not possible. Ensure that tenants have received all
required notices and other information regarding conversion procedures. ● The City will further monitor
its affordable for‐sale inventory by ordering title company lot books, reviewing property profile reports,
and updating its public database annually. ● The City will monitor its affordable rental inventory by
verifying proof of occupancy and performing annual rental income certifications for each BMR tenant. To
help further preserve the City’s affordable housing stock, the City may consider providing assistance to
rehabilitate and upgrade the affordable units as well.
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG; HOME Con.
Not an action item. Staff will continue to reach out to
property owners as their affordable units approach the 3
years, 12 months, and 6 months deadlines to ensure that
proper noticing is sent out to tenants informing them of ther
affordability restrictions of their unit expiring. Whenever
possible, staff will work with nonprofit housing developers
to preserve unit affordability. Staff was able to extend the
affordability restriction of Greenwood Ct Apartments to
2116. Staff has confirmed in 2025 that the 8 units at the
Beardon Dr Apartments continue to be offered at affordable
rents despite affordability restriction expiring. Aviare, Forge
Homestead, and Park City Center were contacted by staff to
ensure proper noticing procedures were followed. When it
was determined that the proper noticing procedures were not
followed, the affordability restriction was extended until
proper noticing was sent, per state law. Ongoing.
MAINTAINING
EXISTING HOUSING
STOCK
Strategy HE‐
3.3.3
CONDOMINIUM
CONVERSION
The existing Condominium Conversion Ordinance regulates the conversion of rental units in multifamily
housing development to preserve the rental housing stock. Condominium conversions are not allowed if
the rental vacancy rate in Cupertino and certain adjacent areas is less than 5 percent at the time of the
application for conversion and has averaged 5 percent over the past six months. The City will continue to
monitor the effectiveness of this ordinance in providing opportunities for homeownership while
preserving a balanced housing stock with rental housing.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. The City continued to monitor the
effectiveness of this ordinance by providing opportunities for
homeownership while preserving a balanced housing stock
with rental housing. Staff will continue to monitor the
balance and growth of rental and ownership housing
annually through the APR and will consider the
effectiveness of the Condominium Conversion Ordinance.
Ongoing.
MAINTAINING
EXISTING HOUSING
STOCK
Strategy HE‐
3.3.4
MULTIFAMILY
HOUSING
PRESERVATION
PROGRAM
When a proposed development or redevelopment of a site would cause a loss of multifamily housing, the
City will grant approval only if: ● The project will comply with the City’s Below Market Rate Housing
Mitigation Program Procedural Manual; ● The number of units provided on the site is at least equal to the
number of existing units; ● Adverse impacts on displaced tenants, in developments with four or more
units, are mitigated; and ● The project replaces existing units at the same or deeper affordability, with the
same number of bedrooms and bathrooms, and comparable square footage to the units demolished and
provides displaced tenants with right of first refusal to rent new comparable units at the same rent as
demolished units. The City will review the program biannually and revise as needed; if revisions are
needed, they will be adopted within one year of
determination of need. In addition, indirect displacement may be caused by factors such as increased
market rents as areas become more desirable. The City will participate, as appropriate, in studies of
regional housing need and displacement, and consider policies or programs to address the indirect
displacement of lower‐income residents as
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
None Required Con.
Not an action item. City must comply with state law and
federal requirements on relocation assistance to displaced
tenants as projects are proposed/constructed. Staff will
continue to review and approve development applications
only if the number of housing units proposed is greater than
the existing count and that any adverse impacts on displaced
tenants are mitigated in accordance with No Net Loss
provisions. The program will be reviewed bienually.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con59
PC 2-25-2025
59 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
Strategy HE‐
3.3.5 LAND ORDINANCE
The City will review and revise its Park Land Ordinance to reduce any potential constraints on residential
development while maintaining access to quality open space. The City will review requirements for
higherdensity projects and evaluate the possibility of open space credits.
Staff will review the Park Land Ordinance in 2025.
Strategy HE‐
3.3.6
TENANT
PROTECTIONS
Study rent stabilization and tenant protection ordinances in California and displacement in Cupertino due
to rising rents and evictions. Work with relevant stakeholders to establish tenant protection and/or a rent
stabilization to ensure protection for renters, as appropriate based on findings
Throughout development of the Housing Element, staff was
directed by City Council to address anti‐displacement for
tenants of BMR units with expiring affordability covanents
as a high priority. In December 2024, staff completed a study
session during a Special Meeting of the Housing
Commission to develop an anti‐displacement policy to
address the needs of households in expiring BMR rental
units. This will include two components: the creation of an
Anti‐Displacement priority waitlist in the BMR program,
and relocation payment assistance to displaced households
in the amount of 3 months of fair market rent. A proposed
ordinance will be presented to the City Council for its
consideration by mid‐2025.
Strategy HE‐
3.3.7
MONITOR
NONGOVERNMENTA
L CONSTRAINTS
IMPEDING
RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT
The City will monitor residential developments that have been approved by the City and where building
permits or final maps have not been obtained, the City will make diligent efforts to contact applicants to
discover why units have not been constructed within two years after approval. If due to nongovernmental
constraints, such as rapid increases in construction costs, shortages of labor or materials, or rising interest
rates, to the extent appropriate and legally possible, the City will seek to identify actions that may help to
reduce or remove these constraints. Additionally, the City will proactively work with stakeholders to
identify nongovernmental constraints or other considerations that may impede the construction of housing
in Cupertino and work collaboratively to find strategies and actions that can eliminate or reduce identified
constraints.
Staff will continue to monitor approved developments and
work with developers to remove any nongovernmental
constraints which may be impeding completion. Feedback
from developers on constraints to development will be
solicited during the outreach event anticipated in early 2025.
SUSTAINABLE
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
Policy HE‐4.1 Energy and Water
Conservation Encourage energy and water conservation in all existing and new residential development.
Community
Development – Building
and Planning
None Required Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to ensure
energy and water conservation in new development through
the application process. Implemented via Strategies HE‐4.1.1
& HE‐4.1.2.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con60
PC 2-25-2025
60 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
SUSTAINABLE
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy HE‐
4.1.1 Enforcement of Title 24 The City will continue to enforce Title 24 requirements for energy conservation and will evaluate utilizing
some of the other suggestions as identified in the Environmental Resources/Sustainabililty Element.
Community
Development – Building None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
The City has Chapter 16.58, Green Building Standards Code,
that requires certain projects to achieve LEED certification or
similar. Staff will continue to enforce Title 24 requirements
through the review and approval of development
applications. Ongoing
SUSTAINABLE
HOUSING
DEVELOPMENT
Strategy HE‐
4.1.2
SUSTAINABLE
PRACTICES
The City will continue to implement the Landscape Ordinance for water conservation and the Green
Building Ordinance (adopted in 2013) that applies primarily to new residential and nonresidential
development, additions, renovations, and tenant improvements of 10 or more units. To further the
objectives of the Green Building Ordinance, the City will evaluate the potential to provide incentives, such
as waiving or reducing fees, for energy conservation improvements at affordable housing projects (existing
or new) with fewer than 10 units to exceed the minimum requirements of the California Green Building
Code. The City will also implement the policies in its climate action plan to achieve residential‐focused
greenhouse gas emission reductions and further these community energy a
Community
Development – Planning
and Building
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
Staff will continue to enforce the Landscape Ordinance and
the Green Building Ordinance requirements through the
review and approval of development applications. Ongoing.
Strategy HE‐
4.1.3
SUSTAINABLE,
ENERGY‐EFFICIENT
HOUSING
The City will work with and support housing developers to develop sustainable, energy‐efficient housing.
Such development should include solar panels, green roofs, energyefficient lighting, and other features
that aim toward carbon‐neutral impacts while lowering energy costs.
Staff will continue to review and approve applications for
housing development that utilize sustainable, energy
efficient practices. Ongoing.
Strategy HE‐
4.1.4
WATER AND
WASTEWATER
PRIORITY
Consistent with the provisions of Government Code Section 65589.7 (Senate Bill 1087), the City will
immediately forward its adopted Housing Element to its water and wastewater providers so they can
grant priority for service allocations to proposed developments that include units affordable to lower‐
income households.
Staff forwarded the certified 2023‐2031 Housing Element to
water and wastewater providers after receiving a letter of
substantial compliance from HCD. Complete as of January
2025.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con61
PC 2-25-2025
61 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
LOWER‐INCOME AND
SPECIAL NEEDS
HOUSING
Policy HE‐5.1
LOWER‐INCOME
AND SPECIAL‐NEEDS
HOUSEHOLDS
Support organizations that provide services to lower‐income and specialneed households in the city, such
as persons experiencing homelessness, extremely low‐income households, seniors, large households,
persons with disabilities, and single‐parent households
Community
Development – Housing
None BMR
AHF; CDBG;
HSG
Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to support
non‐profit organizations which provide services to low‐
income residents through the CDBG, BMR, and HSG
program which releases funds on an annual basis through a
notice of funding availability. Implemented via Strategies HE‐
5.1.1 & HE‐5.1.2
LOWER‐INCOME AND
SPECIAL NEEDS
HOUSING
Strategy HE‐
5.1.1
EMERGENCY
SHELTERS
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
The City commits to complying with the requirements of AB 2339 regarding emergency shelters. As part
of this compliance, the City will: ● Continue to facilitate housing opportunities for special‐needs persons
by allowing emergency shelters as a permitted use, without discretionary review in the R4 zoning district
and continuing to permit emergency shelters in the Quasi Public (BQ) zoning district. ● Amend the
definition of emergency shelters to include other interim interventions, including but not limited to,
navigation centers, bridge housing, and respite or recuperative care. ● Amend the Zoning Code to allow
emergency shelters as a permitted use, without discretionary review, in the new R4 zoning district. ●
Review and revise managerial standards, consistent with State law.
Amendments to zoning code were approved through a public
hearing before the City Council. (Ordinance 24‐2262,
Ordinance 24‐2261). Complete as of July 2024. The City of
Cupertino has joined with other West Valley Cities to study
opportunities to addressed issues faced by the unhoused,
including the development of temporary and emergency
housing facilities, and will sign an MOU for the combined
effort in 2025 which will execute a group contract with
GoodCity to conduct the study.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con62
PC 2-25-2025
62 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
LOWER‐INCOME AND
SPECIAL NEEDS
HOUSING
Strategy HE‐
5.1.2
SUPPORTIVE
SERVICES FOR
LOWER‐INCOME
HOUSEHOLDS AND
PERSONS WITH
SPECIAL NEEDS
The City will continue to use its Below Market Rate Affordable Housing Fund (BMR AHF), Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds, and General Fund Human Service Grants (HSG) funds to
provide for a range of supportive services for lower‐income households and persons with special need
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG; HSG Con.
Staff will continue to annual publish a Request for Proposals
for low‐income public services and will review applications to
ensure that they meet the fund guidelines and further the
Cityʹs low‐income service goals. In 2024, the following
organizations received funding:
•CDBG $19,054.05 to Live Oak Adult Day Services, a senior
adult day care.
•CDBG $35,974.05 to West Valley Community Services
(WVCS) CARE Program, a community access to resource and
education program.
•HSG $10,000 to Catholic Charities of Santa Clara County, a
long‐term care ombudsman program.
•HSG $24,678.11 to Maitri, a transitional housing direct client
services program.
•HSG $16,287.55 to Senior Adult Legal Assistance, a legal
assistance to elders program.
•HSG $74,034.34 to WVCS Haven to Home program, a
supportive services and housing resources program for the
homeless.
Ongoing.
LOWER‐INCOME AND
SPECIAL NEEDS
HOUSING
Strategy HE‐
5.1.3
ROTATING SAFE CAR
PARK
The City will continue to support the operation of a Rotating Safe Car Park program in collaboration with
local nonprofit service providers, such as West Valley Community Services.
Community
Development – Housing None Required Con.
No action is required at this time. Staff will continue to
review and approve applications for the Rotating Safe Car
Park program for Cupertino host locations and support the
program through financial contributions whenever possible.
In 2024, the City of Cuperitno provided $25,000 to the
Rotating Safe Car Park program which served 27 households.
Ongoing.
LOWER‐INCOME AND
SPECIAL NEEDS
HOUSING
Strategy HE‐
5.1.4
LOW‐BARRIER
NAVIGATION
CENTER AND
SUPPORTIVE
HOUSING
The City will amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow supportive housing and low‐barrier navigation
centers for the homeless by right in mixed‐use and nonresidential zoning districts where multifamily uses
are permitted, per Government Code Sections 65650 et seq. and 65660 et seq.
Amendments to zoning code were approved through a public
hearing before the City Council. (Ordinance 24‐2262,
Ordinance 24‐2261). Complete as of July 2024. Amendments
were reviewed by HCD prior to adoption.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con63
PC 2-25-2025
63 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
LOWER‐INCOME AND
SPECIAL NEEDS
HOUSING
Strategy HE‐
5.1.5
RESIDENTIAL CARE
FACILITIES
The Zoning Ordinance now allows residential care facilities for six clients or fewer to be treated as a
singlefamily use consistent with California Health and Safety Code (HSC) Sections . The City will amend
the Zoning Ordinance to allow larger residential care facilities that operate as a single housekeeping unit in
all zones that permit residential uses, with objective standards similar to those applied to other residential
uses permitted in that zoning district.
Amendments to zoning code were approved through a public
hearing before the City Council. (Ordinance 24‐2262,
Ordinance 24‐2261). Complete as of July 2024. Amendments
were reviewed by HCD prior to adoption.
LOWER‐INCOME AND
SPECIAL NEEDS
HOUSING
HE‐5.1.6 MANUFACTURED
HOMES
The City will amend the Zoning Code to permit manufactured homes, as defined in Government Code
Section 65852.3, in the same manner and in the same zoning districts as conventional or stick‐built
structures are permitted.
Amendments to zoning code were approved through a public
hearing before the City Council. (Ordinance 24‐2262,
Ordinance 24‐2261). Complete as of July 2024. Amendments
were reviewed by HCD prior to adoption.
FAIR HOUSING Policy HE‐6.1 HOUSING
DISCRIMINATION
The City will work to eliminate on a citywide basis all unlawful discrimination in housing with respect to
age, race, sex, sexual orientation, marital or familial status, ethnic background, medical condition, or other
arbitrary factors, so that all persons can obtain decent housing.
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG Con.
Implemented via Strategies HE‐6.1.1. The City will continue
to combat housing discrimination through the investigation
and enforcement of fair housing law and education of
landlords through Project Sentinel.
FAIR HOUSING Policy HE‐6.2 HOUSING EQUITY
EDUCATION
The City will work to create opportunities for public education around the issue of housing equity and
education about the history of racial segregation to build community and raise awareness. This should
include more opportunities for community dialogue and shared experiences. Outreach about these
programs will be conducted citywide, but extra focus will be given to areas where long‐term patterns
income segregation may be more prevalent, such as the areas along the Interstate 280 corridor, areas
abutting the intersection of Highway 85 and Stevens Creek Boulevard, along N. Foothill Boulevard (the
western edge of Creston‐Pharlap neighborhood), and along Miller Avenue north of Creekside Park.
The City will continue to collaborate with nonprofit proviers
of fair housing enforcement and low‐income housing legal
defense to educate and raise awareness on systemic housing
inequalities within the community.
FAIR HOUSING Strategy HE‐
6.2.1
FAIR HOUSING
SERVICES
The City will continue to: ● Partner with a local fair housing service provider, such as Project Sentinel, to
provide fair housing services, which include outreach, education, counseling, and investigation of fair
housing complaints. ● Partner with a local fair housing service provider, such as Project
Sentinel, to provide direct services for residents, landlords, and other housing professionals. Among other
things, this should address issues related to the use of HUDVASH vouchers, so that veterans may use such
vouchers without
discrimination.
● Partner with a local fair housing service provider, such as Project Sentinel, to assist individuals with
housing problems such as discrimination and rental issues including repairs, and provide information and
counseling regarding rights and responsibilities under California tenant landlord law. Additionally,
provide annual training to
landlords on fair housing rights and responsibilities with the intent of reducing, or eliminating,
discrimination.
● Coordinate with efforts of the Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium to affirmatively further fair
housing.
● Distribute fair housing materials produced by various organizations at public counters and public
events.
Community
Development – Housing
BMR AHF;
CDBG Con.
The City of Cupertino will continue to maintain an annual
contract with Project Sentinel for the provision of fair
housing services, tenant‐landlord dispute resolution, and fair
housing education through outreach, counselling, and
investgations. In 2024, $50,000 was provided to this program
which provided service to 65 households. Two outreach
events related to fair housing will be held during the
planning period in coordination with the Santa Clara County
Fair Housing Consortium.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con64
PC 2-25-2025
64 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
FAIR HOUSING Strategy HE‐
6.2.2
AFFIRMATIVE
MARKETING
The City will work with affordable housing developers to ensure that affordable housing is affirmatively
marketed to households with disproportionate housing needs, including Hispanic and Black households
who work in and live outside of Cupertino (e.g., materials in Spanish and English, distributed through
employers).
City housing staff will coordinate with economic
development staff to develop a list of 50 local employers to
distribute marketing matierals for affordable housing.
Outreach will be conducted citywide, but extra marketing
efforts will be requested of developers working in or around
areas with historically higher areas of potential income
segregation.
FAIR HOUSING Strategy HE‐
6.2.3 HOUSING MOBILITY
Work with a local fair housing service provider, such as Project Sentinel, to contact rental property owners
and managers of multifamily apartment complexes to provide fair housing information and assistance.
This outreach will include promoting the Housing Choice Voucher (Section 8) program to landlords that
have not previously participated in the program and will target use of multi‐lingual materials. Target
additional outreach to higher‐income neighborhoods, including, but not limited to, the Monta Vista and
Height of the City neighborhoods.
The City of Cupertino will continue to maintain an annual
contract with Project Sentinel for the provision of fair
housing services, tenant‐landlord dispute resolution, and fair
housing education through outreach, counselling, and
investgations. Two outreach events related to fair housing
will be held during the planning period in coordination with
the Santa Clara County Fair Housing Consortium.
FAIR HOUSING Strategy HE‐
6.2.4
HOUSING PROJECT
COORDINATOR
To support the implementation of the multiple new and expanded housing programs and policies
identified in the Housing Element, assign a member of City staff as the housing project coordinator. This
position would assist with developing outreach programs, writing and pursing grant applications,
ongoing monitoring of affordable housing production, preservation and rehabilitation, coordination
between affordable housing developers, the City, and partner agencies and tracking progress on the many
initiatives identified in this Housing Element
The City hired a Senior Housing Coordinator, a dedicated
staff member to enact policies of the Housing Element.
Complete as of June 2024.
LOCAL AND
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Policy HE‐7.1
COORDINATION
WITH LOCAL
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
The Cupertino community places a high value on the excellent quality of education provided by the three
public school districts that serve residents. To ensure the long‐term sustainability of the schools, teachers,
and faculty, in tandem with the preservation and development of vibrant residential areas, the City will
continue to coordinate with the Cupertino Union School District (CUSD), Fremont Union High School
District (FUHSD), and Santa Clara Unified School District (SCUSD).
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to coordinate
with local school districts by forwarding development
projects for comment and review.
LOCAL AND
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Policy HE‐7.2
COORDINATION
REGIONAL EFFORTS
TO ADDRESS
HOUSING‐RELATED
ISSUES
Coordinate efforts with regional organizations, including Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG)
and the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), as well as neighboring jurisdictions, to
address housing and related quality of life issues (such as air quality and transportation).
Community
Development – Housing
and Planning
None Required Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to coordinate
with regional organizations such as Association of Bay Area
Governments, the Metropolitan Transportation Commission,
the Regional CDBG/Housing Coordinators Group, and the
Santa Clara County Planning Collaborative, to address
housing and related quality of life issues.
LOCAL AND
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Policy HE‐7.3 PUBLIC‐PRIVATE
PARTNERSHIPS
Promote public‐private partnerships to address housing needs in the community, especially housing for
the workforce.
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
None Required Con.
Not an action item, however, staff will continue to promote
public‐private partnerships to address workforce housing
needs by engaging local employers and private
organizations.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con65
PC 2-25-2025
65 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
LOCAL AND
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy HE‐
7.3.1
COORDINATE WITH
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
AND
ORGANIZATIONS
The City recognizes the importance of partnering with outside agencies and organizations in addressing
local and regional housing issues. These may include, but are not limited to, the following: ● School
districts ● De Anza College ● Housing providers ● Neighboring jurisdictions ● Association of Bay Area
Governments (ABAG) ● Air Quality Management District ● Housing Trust Silicon Valley ● Santa Clara
County Fair Housing Consortium ● Santa Clara County HOME Consortium ● Santa Clara County
Continuum of Care (COC) ● Housing Authority of Santa Clara County (HASCC) ● Valley Transportation
Authority (VTA) Specifically, the City will meet with these agencies/organizations periodically to discuss
the changing needs, development trends, alternative approaches, and partnering opportunities.
Community
Development – Planning
and Housing
None Required Con.
Staff will continue to meet with local and regional agencies
as neccesary throughout the planning period to ensure
consistency, integration, and best praticies are employed in
city actions in relation to larger scale efforts. The City
continues to regularly meet with and collaborate with other
regional and local jurisdictions through the following
groups: the Association of Bay Area Governments, the Santa
Clara County Planning Collaborative, the Santa Clara
County HOME Consortium, the Santa Clara county PLHA
Consortium, the Regional CDBG/Housing Coordinators
Group, the West Valley Housing/Unhoused Collaboration,
and the Inter‐City Unhoused Response Collaborative.
LOCAL AND
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy 7‐3.2
COORDINATION
WITH LOCAL
SCHOOL DISTRICTS
To ensure the long‐term sustainability of public schools, teachers, and faculty, in tandem with the
preservation and development of vibrant residential areas, the City will coordinate biennially with the
local school districts and colleges to identify housing needs and concerns. The City will discuss potential
partnerships for affordable housing developments for school district employees and college students,
including on school district properties, on a biannual basis. Depending on the outcome of these discussions
with school districts and college leadership, the City will notify districts and partner developers about
relevant funding opportunities as they become available, coordinate technical assistance on grant
applications and offer other incentives listed in Strategy HE‐1.3.11.
Community
Development – Housing None Required Con.
Staff will conduct biennial outreach to local school districts
to solicite feedback on the emerging needs of teacher and
student housing and to identify new opportunities as they
become available.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION Policy M‐1.1
Regional
Transportation
Planning
Participate in regional transportation planning processes to develop programs consistent with the goals
and policies of Cupertino’s General Plan and to minimize adverse impacts on the City’s circulation system.
Work with neighboring cities to address regional transportation and land use issues of mutual interest.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.Not an action item. Coordination with neighboring cities and
regional agencies is active and ongoing.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION Policy M‐1.2 Transportation Impact
Analysis
Evaluate new development and redevelopment projects pursuant to the Cityʹs adopted Transportation
Study Guidelines evaluation criteria.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
Transportation Analysis Guidelines have been adopted for
evaluation of transportation impacts of land development per
the requirements of SB 743 in 2021. Transportation Analysis
Guidelines and the General Plan have been revised to reflect
this change, and to reflect potential updates to VMT
ordinance.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con66
PC 2-25-2025
66 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy M‐
1.2.1 VMT Thresholds New development and redevelopment projects shall meet the VMT thresholds and reduction strategies
described in the Cupertino Municipal Code.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con NEW as of 2024. Not an action item.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy M‐
1.2.2
Citywide VMT
Reduction
Establish a framework for reducing VMT at the citywide scale. These measures may include , but are not
limited to: Working with Valley Transit Authority to increase bus frequency and speed throughout
Cupertino. • Unbundling parking costs from property costs. • Developing a fair‐share cost program for
Silicon Valley Hopper or car share initiatives for development projects. • Implementing market pricing for
parking spaces throughout the city. • Limiting parking supply. • Discouraging single occupancy vehicle
travel. • Implementing a citywide bikeshare program.
Public Works ‐
Transportation;
Community
Development ‐ Planning
General Fund IM
NEW as of 2024. VMT Reduction Needs and Measures
Report recently completed which addresses these
recommendations and provides guidance for
implmenetation. Staff will be reviewing recommendations
to develop strategies for implementation
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy M‐
1.2.3
Project ‐Level VMT
Reduction
Develop a framework of project‐level
VMT reduction measures for new development and redevelopment projects in the city that exceed the
Cityʹs adopted VMT threshold. These VMT reduction measures may include, but are not limited to: •
Requiring the preparation and implementation of a TDM program appropriate to the projectʹs scale. •
Requiring contributions to a fairshare cost program for transit, shuttle, or car share programs. • Requiring
a Behavioral Intervention Program to provide individualized transportation information for project
occupants. • Requiring an on‐site car share program.
Public Works ‐
Transportation;
Community
Development ‐ Planning
General Fund IM
NEW as of 2024. VMT Reduction Needs and Measures
Report recently completed which addresses these
recommendations and provides guidance for
implmenetation. Staff will be reviewing recommendations
to develop strategies for implementation
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy M‐
1.2.4
VMT Mitigation
Banking Fee Program
Establish a VMT Mitigation Banking Fee Program. This program shall fund the construction of facilities
throughout Cupertino that support the reduction of VMT per service population impacts from new
development and redevelopment projects.
Public Works ‐
Transportation;
Community
Development ‐ Planning
General Fund IM
NEW as of 2024. VMT Reduction Needs and Measures
Report recently completed which addresses these
recommendations and provides guidance for
implmenetation. Staff will be reviewing recommendations
to develop strategies for implementation
REGIONAL
COORDINATION Policy M‐1.3 Regional Trail
Development
Continue to plan and provide for a comprehensive system of trails and pathways consistent with regional
systems, including the Bay Trail, Stevens Creek Corridor and Ridge Trail.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
None Required Con.
No action requried at this time. Implemented through the
Bike/Ped Master Plans. Will be addressed through Active
Transportation Plan, currently under development, and
through regional coordination with VTA and County on
regional trails and corridors.
COMPLETE STREETS Policy M‐2.1 Street Design Adopt and maintain street design standards to optimize mobility for all transportation modes including
automobiles, walking, bicycling and transit.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. In 2023, Environmental Programs staff
suggests modifying existing GP language to add references to
Green Stormwater Infrastructure.
COMPLETE STREETS Policy M‐2.2 Adjacent Land Use
Design roadway alignments, lane widths, medians, parking and bicycle lanes, crosswalks and sidewalks
to complement adjacent land uses in keeping with the vision of the Planning Area. Strive to minimize
adverse impacts and expand alternative transportation options for all Planning Areas (Special Areas and
Neighborhoods). Improvement standards shall also consider the urban, suburban and rural environments
found within the City.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con67
PC 2-25-2025
67 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
COMPLETE STREETS Strategy M‐
2.2.1
Rural Road
Improvement
Standards
Consider candidate rural roads and develop specific street improvement standards that preserve the rural
character of these streets. Rural roads would typically feature natural landscaping, no sidewalks and
narrow unpaved shoulders.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented in cooperation with
neighborhoods at their request.
COMPLETE STREETS Strategy M‐
2.2.2
Semi–rural Road
Improvements
Standards
Consider candidate semi–rural roads where curb and gutter improvements, and no sidewalks, are
appropriate.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented in cooperation with
neighborhoods at their request.
COMPLETE STREETS Strategy M‐
2.2.3
Urban Road
Improvement
Standards
Develop urban improvement standards for arterials such as Stevens Creek and De Anza Boulevards. In
these areas, standards may include wide sidewalks, tree wells, seating, bike racks and appropriate street
furniture.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
COMPLETE STREETS Strategy M‐
2.2.4
Suburban Road
Improvement
Standards
Develop suburban road improvement standards for all streets not designated as rural, semi‐rural or in the
Crossroads Area.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
COMPLETE STREETS Policy M‐2.3 Connectivity Promote pedestrian and bicycle improvements that improve connectivity between planning areas,
neighborhoods and services, and foster a sense of community.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Bike/Ped Master
Plans and CIP.
COMPLETE STREETS Strategy M‐
2.3.1
Inter Block
Conncectivity
Require new development and redevelopment to provide interblock connectivity to allow improved
access to all sites on the block from secondary streets, access to the street network via controlled
intersections, minimize conflicts with pedestrian and bicycle traffic on primary streets, and convenient
access for service vehicles.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services;
Community
Development ‐ Planning
General Fund Con.
NEW AS OF 2024. Not an action item. Reviewed in
conjunction with development review.
COMPLETE STREETS Policy M‐2.4 Community Impacts
Reduce traffic impacts and support alternative modes of transportation rather than constructing barriers
to mobility. Do not close streets unless there is a demonstrated safety or over–whelming through traffic
problem and there are no acceptable alternatives since street closures move the problem from one street to
another.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation through Safe
Routes to School and other programs. Active Transportation
Plan being developed which will aim to encourage
alternative modes of transportation.
COMPLETE STREETS Policy M‐2.5 Public Accessibility Ensure all new public and private streets are publicly accessible to improve walkability and reduce
impacts on existing streets.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review and to be considered in Active
Transportation Plan, currently under development.
COMPLETE STREETS Policy M‐2.6 Traffic Calming Consider the implementation of best practices on streets to reduce speeds and make them user–friendly
for alternative modes of transportation, including pedestrians and bicyclists.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
FY 19/20 Work Plan Item. Traffic calming program funded and
ongoing in prior years. Traffic calming program defunded in
2023. Active Transportation Plan being developed which will
aim to encourage alternative modes of transportation.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con68
PC 2-25-2025
68 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.1 Bicycle and Pedestrian
Master Plan
Adopt and maintain a Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, which outlines policies and improvements to
streets, extension of trails, and pathways to create a safe way for people of all ages to bike and walk on a
daily basis, and as shown in Figure M‐1.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
Master Plan is completed and ongoing maintenance of these
plans will be performed. Implementation ongoing through the
Capital Improvement Program. Projects of note include:
Regnart Creek Trail, McClellan Separated bike lane phase 3,
and De Anza Blvd Buffered bike lane project. 2016 Bicycle
Transportation Plan and 2018 Pedestrian Transportation Plan
to be potentially combined into a single Active Transportation
Plan, subject to BPC and Council approval and identification of
funding. Active Transportation Plan approved in CWP and to
be developed in 2025. Stevens Creek Blvd Class IV bike
lanes anticipated in 2025.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.2 Development
Require new development and redevelopment to increase connectivity through direct and safe pedestrian
connections to public amenities, neighborhoods, shopping and employment destinations throughout the
City.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.3 Pedestrian and Bicycle
Crossings
Enhance pedestrian and bicycle crossings and pathways at key locations across physical barriers such as
creeks, highways and road barriers.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Bike/Ped Master
Plans and will be considered in Active Transportation Plan,
to be developed in 2025.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.4 Street Widths Preserve and enhance citywide pedestrian and bike connectivity by limiting street widening purely for
automobiles as a means of improving traffic flow.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con. Not an action item.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.5 Curb Cuts Minimize the number and the width of driveway openings.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY
Strategy M‐
3.5.1
Shared Driveway
Access
Require properties owners to use shared driveway access and use shared driveway access and
interconnected roads within blocks, where feasible. Require driveway access closures, consolidations or
both when a site is remodeled or redeveloped.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY
Strategy M‐
3.5.2
Direct Access from
Secondary Streets
Require properties with frontages on major and secondary streets to provide direct pedestrian and
vehicular access to driveways from the secondary street.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.6 Safe Spaces for
Pedestrians
Require parking lots to include clearly defined paths for pedestrians to provide a safe path to building
entrances.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.7 Capital Improvement
Program
Plan for improvements to pedestrian and bicycle facilities and eliminate gaps along the pedestrian and
bicycle network as part of the City’s Capital Improvement Program.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvements
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Capital
Improvement Program.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con69
PC 2-25-2025
69 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.8 Bicycle Parking Require new development and redevelopment to provide public and private bicycle parking.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.9 Outreach
Actively engage the community in promoting walking and bicycling through education, encouragement
and outreach on improvement projects and programs.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Cityʹs Safe
Routes to School program, Sustainability and other mobility
programs.
WALKABILITY AND
BIKEABILITY Policy M‐3.10 Proactive Enforcement Prioritize enforcement of traffice speeds and regulations on all streets with bike lanes, bike routes, and
around schools.
Santa Clara County
Sheriff’s Department General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation and coordination
with Sheriff Department.
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.1 Transit Agencies Coordinate with VTA to improve transportation service, infrastructure and access in the City, and to
connect to transportation facilities such as Caltrain and VTA light rail stations.
Public Works –
Transportation None Required Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.2 Local Transportation
Services
Create or partner with transit providers, employers, education institutions, and major commercial entities
to minimize gaps within local transportation services.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
VIA shuttle service was successful between Oct 2019 and
March 2020. Service suspended due to COVID‐19 pandemic in
March 2020. Service resumed in late 2021. City received an $8.5
million grant in 2022 in partnership with the City of Santa
Clara to expand and operate the Via service for 4 years. Via
service rebranded as SV Hopper and is ongoing in partnership
with City of Santa Clara. SV Hopper operational and is
ongoing in partnership with City of Santa Clara.
Opportunities for further expansion and integration with local
and regional transit being investigated and implemented.
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.3 Connecting Special
Areas
Identify and implement new or enhanced transit services to connect all Special Areas as identified in
Figure PA‐1 (Chapter 2: Planning Areas)
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
VIA shuttle service was successful between Oct 2019 and
March 2020. Service suspended due to COVID‐19 pandemic.
Service resumed in late 2021. City received an $8.5 million
grant in 2022 partnership with the City of Santa Clara to
expand and operate the Via service for 4 years. Via service
rebranded as SV Hopper and is ongoing in partnership with
City of Santa Clara. SV Hopper operational and is ongoing in
partnership with City of Santa Clara. Opportunities for
further expansion and integratin with local and regional
transit being investigated and implemented.
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.4 Transit Facilities with
New Development
Work with VTA and/or major developments to ensure all new development projects include amenities to
support public transit including bus stop shelters, space for transit vehicles as appropriate and attractive
amenities such as trash receptacles, signage, seating and lighting.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con70
PC 2-25-2025
70 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.5 Access to Transit
Services
Support right–of–way design and amenities consistent with local transit goals to improve transit as a
viable‐way design and amenities consistent with local transit goals to improve transit as a viable
alternative to driving.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services,
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.6 Bus and Shuttle
Programs
Work with large regional employers and private commuter bus/shuttle programs to provide safe pick–up,
drop‐off, and park and rides in order to reduce single occupancy vehicle trips.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.7 Vallco Shopping
District Transfer Station
Work with VTA and/or other transportation service organizations to study and develop a transit transfer
station that incorporates a hub for alternative transportation services such as, car sharing, bike sharing
and/or other services.
Public Works –
Transportation None Required Con.
Coordination with VTA has been active and ongoing,
including active participation with SR 85 PAB and the Transit
Guideway Study. Staff is actively participating in the Stevens
Creek Corridor Vision Study, which will be addressing
transit needs along the corridor.
TRANSIT Policy M‐4.8 Micro‐Transit Continue to support a local micro‐transit option, such as the Silicon Valley Hopper or similar service. Public Works ‐
Transportation General Fund Con.
NEW as of 2024. SV Hopper operational and is ongoing in
partnership with City of Santa Clara. Opportunities for
SAFE ROUTES TO
SCHOOL Policy M‐5.1 Safe Routes to Schools Promote Safe Routes to Schools programs for all schools serving the City.Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation through the
Cityʹs Safe Routes to School program.
SAFE ROUTES TO
SCHOOL
Strategy M‐
5.1.1
Coordination with
School Districts
Coordinate with the School Districts to develop plans and programs that encourage car/van–pooling,
stagger hours of adjacent schools, establish drop‐off locations, and encourage walking and bicycling to
school.
Public Works –
Transportation None Required Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation through the
Cityʹs Safe Routes to School program.
SAFE ROUTES TO
SCHOOL
Strategy M‐
5.1.2 Teen Commission Encourage the Teen Commission to work with schools to encourage year–round programs to incentivize
walking and biking to school.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con. Not an action item.
SAFE ROUTES TO
SCHOOL Policy M‐5.2 Prioritizing Projects Ensure that bicycle and pedestrian safety improvements include projects to enhance safe accessibility to
schools.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implemented through the
Bike/Ped Master Plans, Safe Routes to School Program and
Capital Improvement Program.
SAFE ROUTES TO
SCHOOL Policy M‐5.3 Connections to Trails Connect schools to the citywide trail system.Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implemented through the
Bike/Ped Master Plans, Safe Routes to School Program and
Capital Improvement Program.
SAFE ROUTES TO
SCHOOL Policy M‐5.4 Education Support education programs that promote safe walking and bicycling to schools.Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Cityʹs Safe
Routes to School program. OTS grant received to provide
bike and ped education to schools.
VEHICLE PARKING Policy M‐6.1 Parking Codes
Maintain efficient and updated parking standards to ensure that development provides adequate parking,
both on– and off–street, depending on the characteristics of the development, while also reducing reliance
on the automobile.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
VEHICLE PARKING Policy M‐6.2 Off–street Parking Ensure new off–street parking is properly designed and efficiently used.Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con71
PC 2-25-2025
71 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
VEHICLE PARKING Policy M‐6.3 Unbundled Parking Where required by State Law, require residential, commercial, and office uses to unbundle parking.
Encourage commercial and office uses to unbundle parking.
Community
Development ‐ Planning None Required Con. Staff will let developers know about this policy.
TRANSPORTATION
IMPACT ANALYSIS Policy M‐7.1
Multi–Modal
Transportation Impact
Analysis
Follow guidelines set by the VTA related to transportation impact analyses, while conforming to State
goals for multi‐modal performance targets.
Public Works –
Transportation None Required IM
Transportation Analysis Guidelines have been developed for
both CEQA and non‐CEQA evaluation of transportation
impacts of land development, in conformance with SB 743.
TRANSPORTATION
IMPACT ANALYSIS Policy M‐7.2 Protected Intersections
Consider adopting a Protected Intersection Policy, which would identify intersections where
improvements would not be considered, which would degrade the levels of service for non–vehicular
modes of transportation. Potential locations include intersections in Priority Development Areas (PDAs)
and other areas where non–vehicular transportation is a key consideration, such as, near shopping
districts, schools, parks and senior citizen developments.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
Transportation Analysis Guidelines have been developed for
both CEQA and non‐CEQA evaluation of transportation
impacts of land development, in conformance with SB 743.
Will consider wtih Active Transportation Plan, currently
under development.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Policy M‐8.1 Transportation Promote transportation policies that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.Public Works ‐
Sustainability Programs None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through various mobility and
sustainability program ‐ Bike to Work Day etc.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Strategy M‐
8.1.1 TSM Strategies
Employ TSM strategies to improve efficiency of the transportation infrastructure including strategic right‐
of‐way improvements, intelligent transportation systems and optimization of signal timing to coordinate
with traffic flow.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
City staff currently investigating expansion of traffic adaptive
technologies to achieve improved traffic flow along major
corridors. Signal timing optimization efforts are ongoing
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Strategy M‐
8.1.2
Major and Larger
Employers
Require major and large employers, including colleges and schools, to develop and maintain TDM
programs to reduce vehicle trips generated by their employees and students and develop a tracking
method to monitor results.
Public Works –
Transportation None Required Con.
TDM ordinance to be considered for development and
implementation.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Strategy M‐
8.1.3 TDM Ordinance Develop and adopt a TDM ordinance to reduce vehicle trips with specific implementation actions for all
development projects and a monitoring and reporting program to ensure implementation.
Public Works –
Transportation None Required Con.
TDM ordinance to be considered for development and
implementation.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Policy M‐8.2 Land Use Support development and transportation improvements that help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by
reducing per service population VMT, reducing impacts on the City’s transportation network.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Transportation
None Required Con.
Transportation Analysis Guidelines have been developed for
both CEQA and non‐CEQA evaluation of transportation
impacts of land development, in conformance with SB 743.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Strategy M‐
8.2.1
Design of New
Development
Require new development to include shared amenities that encourage the use of transit, bicycling, or
walking as alternative modes of transportation.
Public Works ‐
Development Services None Required Rev.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Strategy M‐
8.2.2 Pedestrian Activity Require new development to provide pedestrian pathways to entrances, and orient buildings and
entrances to the street, to encourage pedestrian activity.
Community
Development ‐ Planning None Required Rev.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con72
PC 2-25-2025
72 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Strategy M‐
8.2.3
Commercial
Development
Require new commercial developments to provide shared office facilities, cafeterias, daycare facilities,
lunchrooms, showers, bicycle parking, home offices, shuttle buses to transit facilities and other amenities
that encourage the use of transit, bicycling or walking as commute modes to work.
Community
Development ‐ Planning None Required Rev.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Strategy M‐
8.2.4
Residential and Mixed‐
Use Development
Require new residential or mixed‐use developments to provide shared bicycle parking and bike repair
stations at locations close to entrances.
Community
Development ‐ Planning None Required Rev.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review.
GREENHOUSE GAS
EMISSIONS AND AIR
QUALITY
Policy M‐8.3 Alternative Fuel
Charging Stations
Develop a city–wide strategy to encourage the construction of a network of public and private alternative
fuel vehicle charging/fueling stations.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund LR
In 2024 staff worked on evaluating locations for additional
chargers on public and private lands, and applied for two
coalition grants to help install additional charging. One grant
denied, one awarded but uncertain due to federal transition.
ROADWAY SYSTEM
EFFICIENCY Policy M‐9.1 Efficient Automobile
Infrastructure
Strive to maximize the efficiency of existing infrastructure by locating appropriate land uses along
roadways and retrofitting streets to be accessible for all modes of transportation.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Transportation
General Fund Con. Not an action item.
ROADWAY SYSTEM
EFFICIENCY Policy M‐9.2 Reduced Travel
Demand Promote effective TDM programs for existing and new development.
Public Works –
Transportation;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review. TDM ordinance to be considered for
development and implementation.
ROADWAY SYSTEM
EFFICIENCY Policy M‐9.3 Street Width
Except as required by environmental review for new developments, limit widening of streets as a means
of improving traffic efficiency and focus instead on operational improvements to preserve community
character.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with
development review. Ongoing implementation through traffic
signal modernization and synchronization efforts.
ROADWAY SYSTEM
EFFICIENCY
Strategy M‐
9.3.1
Wolfe Road
Overcrossing
Consider alternate designs for the Wolfe Road/Interstate 280 Interchange (e.g. from partial cloverleaf
design to diamond design) when evaluating the need to widen the freeway overcrossing.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
Design of replacment interchange is complete. Utility
relocations are complete. Interchange construction anticipated
2025.
ROADWAY SYSTEM
EFFICIENCY
Strategy M‐
9.3.2 Streetscape Design
When reviewing the widening of an existing street, consider aesthetically pleasing enhancements and
amenities to improve the safe movement of pedestrians and bicyclists in keeping with the vision of the
Planning Area.
Public Works –
Transportation None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented with the Captial
Improvement Program and development review.
TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy M‐10.1 Transportation
Improvement Plan
Develop and implement an updated citywide transportation improvement plan necessary to
accommodate vehicular, pedestrian and bicycle transportation improvements to meet the City’s needs.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
Action completed through development of Bike and Ped
Master Plans and a Transportation Impact Fee project list. City
Attorneyʹs Office to consider update to Traffic Impact Fee
program in partnership with Transportation Division. Active
Transportation Plan to be developed in 2025.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con73
PC 2-25-2025
73 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy M‐10.2 Transportation Impact
Fee
Ensure sustainable funding levels for the Transportation Improvement Plan by enacting a transportation
impact fee for new development.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund IM
Action completed. TIF adopted in late 2017. TIF update
paused in 2021. City Attorneyʹs Office to consider further
update to Traffic Impact Fee program in partnership with
Transportation Division. Action completed. TIF adopted in late
2017. TIF update paused in 2021. City Attorneyʹs Office to
consider further update to Traffic Impact Fee program in
partnership with Transportation Division.
TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy M‐10.3 Multi–Modal
Improvements
Integrate the financing, design and construction of pedestrian and bicycle facilities with street projects.
Build pedestrian and bicycle improvements at the same time as improvements for vehicular circulation to
enable travelers to transition from one mode of transportation to another (e.g. bicycle to bus).
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvements
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Implemented with the Captial
Improvement Program and development review.
TRANSPORTATION
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy M‐10.4 Roadway Maintenance
Funding Identify and secure new funding sources to fund the on‐going routine maintenance of roadways.
Public Works –
Transportation,
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund/Grants
Con.Grant funding routinely used to fund on‐going maintenance to
the extent possible.
PLANNING AND
REGIONAL
TRANPORTATION
Policy ES‐1.1 Principles of
Sustainability
Incorporate the principles of sustainability into Cupertino’s planning, infrastructure and development
process in order to improve the environment, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and meet the needs of the
community without compromising the needs of future generations.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs;
Commuity Development
– Planning;
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. This item is executed with distinct projects
as directed by Council, for example adopting all‐electric reach
codes. In 2021, Council authorized waiving fees for certain
landscaping projects that conserve water.
PLANNING AND
REGIONAL
TRANPORTATION
Strategy ES‐
1.1.1
Climate Action Plan
(CAP)
Adopt, implement and maintain a Climate Action Plan to attain greenhouse gas emission targets
consistent with state law and regional requirements. This qualified greenhouse gas emissions reduction
plan, by BAAQMD’s definition, will allow for future project CEQA streamlining and will identify
measures to:
*Reduce energy use through conservation and efficiency;
*Reduce fossil fuel use through multi–modal and alternative transportation;
*Maximize use of and, where feasible, install renewable energy resources;
*Increase citywide water conservation and recycled water use;
*Accelerate Resource Recovery through expanded recycling, composting, extended producer responsibility
and procurement practices;
*Promote and incentivize each of those efforts to maximize community participation and impacts; and
*Integrate multiple benefits of green infrastructure with climate resiliency and adaptation.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund IM
Action completed. CAP adopted in 2016. In August 2022,
Council adopted the Climate Action Plan 2.0 which targets a
carbon‐neutral City by 2040 or eariler. The CAP 2.0 also
includes tools to facilitiate GHG analysis under CEQA by
creating GHG thresholds of significance, as well as checklists
that can be used by developers to align compliance with the
Cupertino GHG reduction plan according to California Air
Resources Board guidelines. In 2024 staff coordinated a
greenhouse gas inventory analysis for 2021 data.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con74
PC 2-25-2025
74 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
PLANNING AND
REGIONAL
TRANPORTATION
Strategy ES‐
1.1.2
CAP and Sustainability
Strategies
Implementation
Periodically review and report on the effectiveness of the measures outlined in the CAP and the strategies
in this Element. Institutionalize sustainability by developing a methodology to ensure all environmental,
social and lifecycle costs are considered in project, program, policy and budget decisions.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund IM
Action completed in 2018. After adoption of CAP 2.0 in August
2022, the Sustainability Division is developing an
implementation plan to consult with all departments with the
aim to incorporate the updated Climate Action Plan actions
into City operations. The Council also authorized budget to
support an interactive, visual dashboard to facilitiate action
tracking within the City and also to improve transparency for
the public. In 2024 staff created an annual CAP update to
show progress. All Council staff reports now include a
Sustainability impact section.
PLANNING AND
REGIONAL
TRANPORTATION
Strategy ES‐
1.1.3
Climate Adaptation
and Resiliency
Conduct a climate vulnerability assessment and set preparedness goals and strategies to safeguard human
health and community assets susceptible to the impacts of a changing climate (e.g. increased drought,
wildfires, flooding). Incorporate these into all relevant plans, including the Emergency Preparedness Plan,
Local Hazard Mitigation Plan, Dam Failure Plan, Climate Action Plan, Watershet Protection Plan and
Energy Assuredness Plan.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund IM
Action Completed in 2015. In 2022, the Sustainbility team
created a draft Climate Vulnerability Assessment which is
summarized within the adopted CAP 2.0.
PLANNING AND
REGIONAL
TRANPORTATION
Policy ES‐1.2
Regional Growth and
Transportation
Coordination
Periodically review and report on the effectiveness of the measures outlined in the CAP and the strategies
in this Element. Institutionalize sustainability by developing a methodology to ensure all environmental,
social and lifecycle costs are considered in project, program, policy and budget decisions.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con.Ongoing effort with the Sustainability Commission and annual
reports to City Council.
PLANNING AND
REGIONAL
TRANPORTATION
Strategy ES‐
1.2.1
Local Plan Consistency
with Regional Plans
Update and maintain local plans and strategies so they are consistent with One Bay Area Plan to qualify
for State transportation and project CEQA streamlining.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Transportation
General Fund Con.Not an action item. Reviewed when local plans are updated.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY Policy ES‐2.1
Conservation and
Efficient Use of Energy
Resources
Encourage the maximum feasible conservation and efficient use of electrical power and natural gas
resources for new and existing residences, businesses, industrial and public uses.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs None Required IM
Adopted a reach code in 2019 which brings Cupertino above
and beyond the state energy code for requiring all‐electric
construction in most cases. Cupertino’s local reach code was re‐
adopted during the 2022 building code update. 2024‐
Cupertino suspended enforcement of its reach code after the
9th Circuit Court decision against Berkeley. A new reach
code was approved in November 2024. Awaiting CEC and
CBSC approval before enforcement can begin.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con75
PC 2-25-2025
75 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES‐
2.1.1 Coordination Continue to evaluate, and revise as necessary, applicable City plans, codes and procedures for inclusion of
Federal, State and regional requirements and conservation targets.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed when local plans are updated.
The next major opportunity to evaluate City procedures is to
update the Environmental Purchasing Policy. The next major
opportunity to evaluate codes is the next Statewide code cycle
beginning in calendar year 2022. With the adoption of the CAP
2.0, the Sustainability Division is underway with an
implementation planning process that will identify needed
updates to City policies and procedures. The August 2022
legislation from the Federal and State governments present
opportunity over the next 5‐10 years for new funding sources
to come to Cupertino to support sustainability efforts. 2024‐
Staff looking at 2025 (eff. 2026) triennial building code
update and considering reach options.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES‐
2.1.2
Comprehensive Energy
Management
Prepare and implement a comprehensive energy management plan for all applicable municipal facilities
and equipment to achieve the energy goals established in the City’s Climate Action Plan. Track the City’s
energy use and report findings as part of the CAP reporting schedule. Embed this plan into the City’s
Environmentally Preferable Procurement Policy to ensure measures are achieved through all future
procurement and construction practices.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund IM
The City developed and released a public‐facing and internal‐
facing set of dashboards that are updated in real time to
display energy and water consumption at key facilities. A
series of automated reports alerts staff to consumption trends
and high usage alarms. The Cityʹs energy management efforts
identify increased cost exposure to City budgets from increases
in water and energy rates. A number of dashboards are
available to staff in order to provide information to better
manage energy and water use across City assets. Ongoing
effort informed by use of software designed for utility data
analysis. 2024‐ selected new software vendor to manage
utility data and create dashboards.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Startegy ES‐
2.1.3
Energy Efficient
Replacements
Continue to use life cycle cost analysis to identify City assets for replacement with more energy efficient
technology. Utilize available tools to benchmark and showcase city energy efficiency achievements (i.e.
EPA Portfolio Manager, statewide Green Business Program).
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con.
This is not an action item and occurs on a continual basis. Cost
analysis has identified the most energy‐intensive and water‐
intensive sites, and the Sustainability Division works with the
Capital Improvements and Facilities teams to plan for retrofits.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con76
PC 2-25-2025
76 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES‐
2.1.4 Incentive Program
Consider incentive programs for projects that exceed mandatory requirements and promote incentives
from state, county and federal governments for improving energy efficiency and expanding renewable
energy installations.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund IM
This is an ongoing action. The City actively participates in
development and promotion of regional incentive programs in
partnership with BayREN, Silicon Valley Clean Energy, and
the ABAG POWER natural gas purchasing collective. The
Federal and State governments have committed significant
resources to funding and technical assistance for sustainability
efforts for local communities. The Sustainability Division is
working to increase capacity and awareness so all Departments
have resources needed to access these funds.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES‐
2.1.5 Urban Forest Encourage the inclusion of additional shade trees, vegetated stormwater treatment and landscaping to
reduce the “heat island effect” in development projects.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. The CAP 2.0 adopted in August 2022 includes an
action to create an Urban Canopy Management Plan which
will include a study on additional shade trees.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES ‐
2.1.6
Alternate Energy
Sources
Promote and increase the use of alternate and renewable energy resources for the entire community
through effective policies, programs and incentives.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES ‐
2.1.7
Energy Co–generation
Systems
Encourage the use of energy co–generation systems through the provision of an awareness program
targeting the larger commercial and industrial users‐generation systems through the provision of an
awareness program targeting the larger commercial and industrial users and public facilities.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs None Required Con. Not an action item.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Stratagy ES‐
2.1.8
Energy Audits and
Financing
Continue to offer and leverage regional partners’ programs to conduct energy audits and/or subvention
programs for homes, commercial, industrial and city facilities, and recommend improvements that lead to
energy and cost savings opportunities for participants and encourage adoption of alternative energy
technologies. Encourage energy audits to include emerging online and application–based energy analytics
and diagnostic tools. Share residential and commercial energy efficiency and renewable energy financing
tools through outreach events and civic media assets.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item.
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES‐
2.1.9
Energy Efficient
Transportation Modes
Continue to encourage fuel–efficient transportation modes such as alternative fuel vehicles, driverless
vehicles, public transit, car and van–pooling community and regional shuttle systems, car and bike sharing
programs, safe routes to schools, communter benefits, and pedestrian and bicycle paths through
infrastructure investment, development incentives, and community education.
Public Works –
Sustainability
Programs,Transportation
General Fund IM
Cityʹs VIA Shuttle program began operation in 2019. The cityʹs
own alternative commute program also began operation in
August 2019 and has paused due to COVID risk. The VIA
Shuttle program was reinitiated in late 2021. The Pilot program
ends in June 2023. Staff has secured $8.465M in grant funding
to expand program in partnership with adjacent jurisdictions.
Via service rebranded as SV Hopper and is ongoing in
partnership with City of Santa Clara. Opportunities for further
expansion being investigated.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con77
PC 2-25-2025
77 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
ENERGY
SUSTAINABILITY
Strategy ES‐
2.1.10
Community Choice
Energy
Collaborate with regional partners to evaluate feasibility for development of a Community Choice Energy
Program.
Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund N/A Action Completed.
SUSTAINABLE
BUILDINGS Policy ES‐3.1 Green Building Design Set standards for the design and construction of energy and resource conserving/efficient building.Public Works–
Sustainability Programs General Fund N/A Action Completed. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
SUSTAINABLE
BUILDINGS
Strategy ES‐
3.1.1
Green Building
Program
Periodically review and revise the City’s Green Building ordinance to ensure alignment with CALGreen
requirements for all major private and public projects that ensure reduction in energy and water use for
new development through site selection and building design.
Community
Development – Building
and Planning
General Fund Con. Ongoing operational practice by City staff.
SUSTAINABLE
BUILDINGS
Strategy ES‐
3.1.2 Staff Training
Continue to train appropriate City staff in the design principles, costs and benefits of sustainable building
and landscape design. Encourage City staff to attend external trainings on these topics and attain relevant
program certifications (e.g. Green Point Rater, LEED Accredited Professional).
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con. Ongoing operational practice by City staff.
SUSTAINABLE
BUILDINGS
Strategy ES‐
3.1.3
Green Building
Informational Seminars
Conduct and participate in Green Building informational seminars and workshops for members of the
design and construction industry, land development, real estate sales, lending institutions, landscaping
and design, the building maintenance industry and prospective project applicants.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con. Annual activity in partnership with BayREN
SUSTAINABLE
BUILDINGS
Strategy ES‐
3.1.4
Green Building
Demonstration
Pursue municipal facility retrofits through a Green Capital Improvement Program (CIP), and new
construction projects that exceed CALGreen and achieve third–party certification criteria (e.g. LEED,
Living Building Challenge, Zero Net Energy) as a means of creating demonstration spaces for developer
and community enrichment.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
AIR QUALITY Policy ES‐4.1 New Development Minimize the air quality impacts of new development projects and air quality impacts that affect new
development.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
None Required Con. Implement with Strategies ES‐4.1.1 and ES‐4.1.2
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.1.1 Toxic Air Contaminants Continue to review projects for potential generation of toxic air contaminants at the time of approval and
confer with BAAQMD on controls needed are uncertain.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. In October 2021, the Council adopted a new Chapter in
the Municipal Code to implement regulations requiring all
projects to comply with recommendations and requirements
from BAAQMD for air quality contaminants.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.1.2 Dust Control Continue to require water application to non–polluting dust control measures during demolition and the
duration of the construction period.
Community
Development – Building;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. In October 2021, the Council adopted a new Chapter in
the Municipal Code to implement regulations requiring all
projects to comply with recommendations and requirements
from BAAQMD for air quality contaminants during
construction.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con78
PC 2-25-2025
78 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.1.3 Planning Ensure that land use and transportation plans support air quality goals.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Transportation
None Required IM
The City adoped a Vehicle Miles Traveled policy and
thresholds in 2021. These help provide the City with tools to
address carbon emissions from transportation and align the
City with stateʹs goals. Between 2021 and 2024, the City
completed adoption of the 6th Cycle Housing Element, in
which Housing sites were selected with the goal of ensuring
that much of the Cityʹs Priority Housing Sites were located
along the ʺhigher quality transit corridorsʺ such as Stevens
Creek Blvd.
AIR QUALITY Policy ES‐4.2 Existing Development Minimize the air quality impacts of existing development.City Manager ‐
Sustainability Programs None Required Con.
Sustainability division is promoting regional programs to
incentivize switching from gas to electric appliances, which
directly reduces air quality impacts of natural gas combustion
in homes and businesses.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.2.1
Public Education
Program
Establish a citywide public education program providing information on ways to reduce and control
emissions; and continue to provide information about alternative commutes, carpooling and restricting
exacerbating activities on “Spare the Air” high–emissions days.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con.
Spare the Air alerts sent out and posted on City website. Cityʹs
VIA Shuttle program commenced on Oct. 29, 2019. The VIA
Shuttle program was reinitiated in late 2021. Staff has secured
$8.465M in grant funding to expand program in partnership
with adjacent jurisdictions. 2024‐ used grant money from
SVCE to develop VR experience showcasing home
conversion to electric appliances. Also have public‐facing
dashboard that features information about what the public
can do to reduce emissions.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.2.2 Home Occupations Review and consider expanding the allowable home–based businesses in residential zoned properties to
reduce the need to commute to work.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund LR
No action has been taken with regard to this strategy, however,
the Home Occupations Chapter broadly allows most activities
to occur from a home.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.2.3
Tree Planting in Private
Development
Review and enhance the City’s tree planting and landscaping program and requirements for private
development to reduce air pollution levels.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund LR
Consideration of trees as beneficial to air quality is regulated
under CMC 14.18. The City has a Work Program item to
consider evaluating the ʺProtected Treesʺ list. Staff is
awaiting direction from Council on the updated Work
Program before it begins work on this project.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.2.4
Fuel–efficient Vehicles
and Use
Prioritize the purchase, replacement and on–going use of fuel–efficient and low polluting City fleet
vehicles. Update applicable policies and programs to require life cycle cost analyses and include
alternative fueling infrastructure review and related funding allocations. Update the Vehicle Use Policy
and pursue fleet management best practices to support fuel conservation, scheduled maintenance and fleet
fuel tracking. Pursue available grant funding to offset the cost of implementing these programs.
Public Works – Service
Center General Fund Con.
Public Works looks to replace internal combustion engine
(ICE) vehicles with hybrids or electric vehicles, and
implements elements of the Climate Action Plan (CAP). 19% of
eligible city vehicles have been converted to electric or hybrid
drives. Starting 2024, at least 50% of new vehicle purchases
will be non‐emissions vehicles.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.2.5
Point Sources of
Emissions
Continue to seek the cooperation of the BAAQMD to monitor emissions from identified point sources that
impact the community. In addition, for sources not within the regulatory jurisdiction of the City, seek
cooperation from the applicable regulatory authority to encourage reduction of emissions and dust from
the point source.
Public Works –
Sustainability Programs None Required Con.
Ongoing monitoring for the Lehigh Plant being conducted by
BAAQMD. The IT and Sustainability teams partnered in 2022
to deploy some additional air quality monitoring stations, as
well as a baseline air quality study, which are in the process of
developing visuals and alerts for the public. However, these
monitors were removed in 2023 as part of the budget
reduction.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con79
PC 2-25-2025
79 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
AIR QUALITY Policy ES‐4.3 Use of Open Fires and
Fireplaces Discourage high pollution fireplace use.Public Works –
Sustainability Programs None Required Con.
Implement with Strategies ES‐4.3.1 and ES‐4.3.2. New
construction electrification code adopted. 2024‐ electrification
reach code replaced by building performance one. New
fireplaces still disallowed elsewhere in code.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.3.1 Education Continue to make BAAQMD literature on reducing pollution from fireplace use available.Public Works –
Sustainability Programs None Required Con. Not an action item.
AIR QUALITY Strategy ES‐
4.3.2 Fireplaces Continue to prohibit new wood–burning fireplaces, except EPA certified wood stoves as allowed by the
Building Code.
Community
Development – Building None Required Con.
Not an action item. New construction electrification code
adopted. 2024‐ electrification reach code replaced by building
performance one.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS Policy ES‐5.1 Urban Ecosystem Manage the public and private development to ensure the protection and enhancement of its urban
ecosystem.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Park Improvement;
Community
Development – Planning
None Required Con. Not an action item. Implement with underlying strategies.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS
Strategy ES‐
5.1.1 Landscaping
Ensure that the City’s tree planting, landscaping and open space policies enhance the urban ecosystem by
encouraging medians, pedestrian–crossing curb–extensions planting that is native, drought–tolerant, treats
stormwater and enhance urban plant, aquatic and animal resources in both, private and public
development.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program,
Service Center, Park
Improvement,
Environmental
Programs, and
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning;
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. 2022 ‐ Environmental Programs staff
suggests modifying existing GP language to add references to
Green Stormwater Infrastructure.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS
Strategy ES‐
5.1.2 Built Environment
Ensure that sustainable landscaping design is incorporated in the development of City facilities, parks and
private projects with the inclusion of measures such as tree protection, stormwater treatment and planting
of native, drought tolerant landscaping that is beneficial to the environment.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program,
Service Center Park
Improvement, and
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning;
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. The Cityʹs green building ordinance as well as
California green building standards contains measures for
water‐efficient landscaping and other sustainabile landscaping
measures as conditions of obtaining a building permit where
applicable. 2022 ‐ Environmental Programs staff suggests
modifying existing GP language to add references to Green
Stormwater Infrastructure.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con80
PC 2-25-2025
80 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS Policy ES‐5.2 Development Near
Sensitive Areas
Encourage the clustering of new development away from sensitive areas such as riparian corridors,
wildlife habitat and corridors, public open space preserves and ridgelines. New developments in these
areas must have a harmonious landscaping plan approved prior to development.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS
Strategy ES‐
5.2.1
Riparian Corridor
Protection Require the protection of riparian corridors through the development approval process.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS Policy ES‐5.3
Landscaping In and
Near Natural
Vegetation
Preserve and enhance existing natural vegetation, landscaping features and open space when new
development is proposed within existing natural areas. When development is proposed near natural
vegetation, encourage the landscaping to be consistent with the palate of vegetation found in the natural
vegetation.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Park Improvement
None Required/
Capital
Improvement
Program
Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. The City Council adopted the Green Infrastructure
Plan in September 2019 which prioritizes design features of
public CIP projects that promote stormwater retention,
infiltration, and capture of pollution runoff.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS
Strategy ES‐
5.3.1 Native Plants
Continue to emphasize the planting of native, drought tolerant, pest resistant, non–invasive, climate
appropriate plants and ground covers, particularly for erosion control and to prevent disturbance of the
natural terrain.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs; Community
Development – Planning
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
The Cityʹs demonstration garden at City Hall is an educational
resource for citizens interested in providing natural and
drought‐resistent landscaping for their own property.
Sustainability division staff also promotes regional incentive
programs to remove turf and replace with native landscaped
alternatives.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS
Strategy ES‐
5.3.2 Hillsides Minimize lawn area in the hillsides.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
Also implemented by regulations in the newly adopted
Urgency Ordinance related to implementation of SB 9
requirements.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS Policy ES‐5.4 Hillside Wildlife
Migration
Confine fencing on hillside property to the area around a building, rather than around an entire site, to
allow for migration of wild animals.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS Policy ES‐5.5 Recreation and Natural
Vegetation
Limit recreation in natural areas to activities compatible and appropriate with preserving natural
vegetation, such as hiking, horseback riding, mountain biking and camping.
Public Works – Park
Improvement, Parks and
Recreation ‐ Business
Services and Outdoor
Recreation & Youth
Development
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Capital
Improvement Program and the Municipal Code.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS Policy ES‐5.6 Recreation and Wildlife
Provide open space linkages within and between properties for both recreation and wildlife activities,
most specifically for the benefit of wildlife that is threatened, endangered or designated as species of
special concern.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con81
PC 2-25-2025
81 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS
Strategy ES‐
5.6.1
Creek and Water
Course Identification
Require identification of creeks, water courses and riparian areas on site plans and require that they be
protected from adjacent development.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
URBAN AND RURAL
ECOSYSTEMS
Strategy ES‐
5.6.2 Trail Easements Consider requiring easements for trail linkages if analysis determines that they are needed.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
MINERAL RESOURCES Policy ES‐6.1 Mineral Resource Areas Cooperatively work with Santa Clara County to ensure that plans for restoration and mining operations at
Lehigh Hanson and Stevens Creek quarries consider environmental impacts and mitigations.
City Manager; Public
Works None Required Con.Not an action item. Comments and review conducted as and
when projects are proposed.
MINERAL RESOURCES Strategy ES‐
6.1.1 Public Participation Strongly encourage Santa Clara County to engage with the affected neighborhoods when considering
changes to restoration plans and mineral extraction activity.City Manager None Required Con.
Not an action item. Comments and review conducted as and
when projects are proposed.
MINERAL RESOURCES Strategy ES‐
6.1.2
Recreation in Depleted
Mining Areas
Consider designating abandoned quarries for passive recreation to enhance plant and wildlife habitat and
rehabilitate the land.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
WATER Policy ES‐7.1 Natural Water Bodies
and Drainage Systems
In public and private development use Low Impact Development (LID) principles to manage stormwater
by mimicking natural hydrology, minimizing grading and protecting or restoring natural drainage
systems.
Public Works –
Development Services,
Capital Improvement
Program and
Environmental Programs
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
2022 ‐ Environmental Programs staff suggests modifying
existing GP language to add references to Green Stormwater
Infrastructure.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.1.1
Public and Private
Development Plans
Continue to require topographical information; identification of creeks, streams and drainage areas; and
grading plans with development proposals to ensure protection and efficient use of water resources.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
WATER Policy ES‐7.2 Reduction of
Impervious Surfaces
Minimize stormwater runoff and erosion impacts resulting from development and use Low Impact
Development (LID) designs to treat stormwater or recharge groundwater.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
Implemented Hardscape Conversion Rebate Program in July
2019 through the Clean Water and Storm Protection Parcel Fee
which passed by ballot measure in July 2019. Hardscape
conversion rebate program eliminated in 2023 by Council vote
due to extremely low community interest and only one
successful rebate application. 2024‐ no change
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con82
PC 2-25-2025
82 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.2.1 Lot Coverage Consider updating lot coverage requirements to include paved surfaces such as driveways and on–grade
pervious patios to incentivize the construction of pervious surfaces.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
General Fund LR
The 2019 California Green Building Standards, as well as
Cupertinoʹs local green building ordinance contains measures
limiting the amount of impervious surface area for projects
seeking a building permit where applicable. The Municipal
Regional Permit requires storm drain from all impervious
areas be treated through Low Impact Development standards.
2024‐no change
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.2.2
Pervious Walkways
and Driveways
Encourage the use of pervious materials for walkways and driveways. If used on public and quasi‐public
property, mobility and access for the disabled should take precedence.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. The City Council adopted the Green Infrastructure
Plan in September 2019 which prioritizes design features of
public CIP projects that promote stormwater retention,
infiltration, and capture of pollution runoff.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.2.3 Maximize Infiltration Minimize impervious surface areas, and maximize on–site filtration and the use of on–site retention
facilities.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
Implemented Hardscape Conversion Rebate Program in July
2019 through the Clean Water and Storm Protection Parcel Fee
which passed by ballot measure in July 2019. Hardscape
conversion rebate program eliminated in 2023 by Council vote
due to extremely low community interest and only one
successful rebate application. 2024 ‐ no change
WATER Policy ES‐7.3 Pollution and Flow
Impacts
Ensure that surface and groundwater quality impacts are reduced through development review and
voluntary efforts.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
None Required Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.3.1 Development Review Require LID designs such as vegetated stormwater treatment systems and green infrastructure to mitigate
pollutant loads and flows.
Public Works –
Development Services,
Capital Improvement
Program and
Environmental Programs
None Required Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.3.2 Creek Clean Up Encourage volunteer organizations to help clean creek beds to reduce pollution and help return waterways
to their natural state.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs None Required Con.
Not an action item. Volunteer creek clean up activities
organized and conducted in conjunction with City Staff
support 4‐6 times per year.
WATER Policy ES‐7.4 Watershed Based
Planning Review long–term plans and development projects to ensure good stewardship of watersheds.Public Works –
Environmental Programs None Required Con. Implement through Strategies ES‐7.4.1, ES‐7.4.2 and ES‐7.4.3
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.4.1
Storm Drainage Master
Plan
Develop and maintain a Storm Drainage Master Plan which identifies facilities needed to prevent
“10–year” event street flooding and “100–year” event structure flooding and integrate green infrastructure
to meet water quality protection needs in a cost effective manner.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
General Fund IM
Storm Drainage Master Plan updated Jan 2019. The City
Council adopted the Green Infrastructure Plan in September
2019. As Capital Improvement projects are developed,
inclusion of stormwater retention features will be evaluated.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con83
PC 2-25-2025
83 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.4.2
Watershed
Management Plans
Work with other agencies to develop broader Watershed Management Plans to model and control the
City’s hydrology.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
None Required Con. Not an action item. Onging coordination.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.4.3 Development Review development plans to ensure that projects are examined in the context of impacts on the entire
watershed, in order to comply with the City’s non‐point source Municipal Regional Permit.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code
and reviewed in conjunction with project review.
WATER Policy ES‐7.5 Groundwater Recharge
Sites
Support the SCVWD efforts to find and develop groundwater recharge sites within Cupertino and provide
public recreation where possible.
Public Works –
Development Services None Required Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WATER Policy ES‐7.6 Other Water Sources Encourage the research of other water sources, including water reclamation.Public Works ‐
Sustainability Programs None Required LR
City has been working with SCVWD regarding the expansion
of reclaimed water systems through Cupertino. The City is
looking into the feasibility of other reclaimed water options.
Feasibility study recommended as a CWP item by
Sustainability Commission for FY24‐25. 2024‐feasibility
research conducted, memo developed.
WATER Policy ES‐7.7 Industrial Water
Recycling
Encourage industrial projects in cooperation with the Cupertino Sanitary District, to have long–term
conservation measures, including recycling equipment for manufacturing and water supplies in the plant.
Public Works ‐
Sustainability Programs None Required Con. Not an action item.
WATER Policy ES‐7.8 Natural Water Courses
Retain and restore creek beds, riparian corridors, watercourses and associated vegetation in their natural
state to protect wildlife habitat and recreation potential and assist in groundwater percolation. Encourage
land acquisition or dedication of such areas.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Development
Services
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.8.1
Inter–Agency
Coordination
Work with the SCVWD and other relevant regional agencies to enhance riparian corridors and provide
adequate flood control by use of flow increase mitigation measures, such as hydromofication controls as
established by the Municipal Regional Permit.
Public Works –
Development Services None Required Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination and implementation
through the Municipal Code.
WATER Policy ES‐7.9
Inter–Agency
Coordination for Water
Conservation
Continue to coordinate citywide water conservation and regional water supply problem solving efforts
with the SCVWD, SJWC and CALWater.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs; Sustainability
None Required Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WATER Stratey ES‐7.9.1 Water Conservation
Measures
Implement water conservation measures and encourage the implementation of voluntary water
conservation measures from the City’s water retailers and SCVWD.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs;
Sustainability,
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing education/ coordination. The
drought emergency continuesd in 2023, with Cupertino
facilities enacting water usage restrictions at all parks and City
properties. 2024 ‐ through use of utility data tracking
software continue to monitor and guide water use reductions
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con84
PC 2-25-2025
84 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
WATER Policy ES‐7.10
Public Education
Regarding Resource
Conservation
Provide public information regarding resource conservation.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs; Sustainability
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing education/ coordination.
WATER Policy ES‐7.10.1 Outreach
Continue to send educational information and notices to households and businesses with water
prohibitions, water allocations and conservation tips. Continue to offer featured articles in the Cupertino
Scene and Cupertino Courier. Consider providing Public Service Announcements on the City’s Channel
and Cupertino Radio.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs; Sustainability
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing education/ coordination. In 2021,
the City produced a new banner that was hung over Stevens
Creek boulevard making residents aware of the Cityʹs drought
resources and messaging. In 2022, the City sent postcards to all
commercial and multifamily property owners notifying them
of the Statewide restriction on watering non‐functional turf
grass. In 2023, there were no direct mailing done, however,
drought related resources available on the Cityʹs website.
ongoing
WATER Policy ES‐7.10.2 Demonstration
Gardens
Consider including water–wise demonstration gardens in some parks where feasible as they are
re–landscaped or improved using drought tolerant native and non–invasive, and non–native plants.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs; Sustainability
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing education/ coordination.
Implemented at City Hall. The Cityʹs demonstration garden at
City Hall is an educational resource for citizens interested in
providing natural and drought‐resistent landscaping for their
own property. The garden also saves the City significant water
and maintenance expense. Sustainability division staff also
promotes regional incentive programs to remove turf and
replace with native landscaped alternatives. A ribbon cutting
was hosted at City Hall for this demonstration garden in
August 2019, and the City Staff created an online portal to
increase the educational value of this resourse.
cupertino.org/demogarden. Further opportunities will be
evaluated with new projects.
WATER Policy ES‐7.11
Water Conservation
and Demand Reduction
Measures
Promote efficient use of water throughout the City in order to meet State and regional water use reduction
targets.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs
and Service Center;
Sustainability
General Fund Con.
Ongoing implementation of State and Regional intitatives
regarding water conservation, as well as education/
coordination. Developed pilot programs such as the City Hall
demonstration garden and the Climate Victory Gardens direct‐
install program. In 2023, Climate Victory Gardens not
approved to continue due to budget.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.11.1
Urban Water
Management Plan
Collaborate with water retailers serving the City in the preparation of their Urban Water Management
Plan, including water conservation strategies and programs.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs, Service Center
None Required Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WATER Srategy ES‐
7.11.2
Water Conservation
Standards
Comply with State water conservation standards by either adopting the State standards or alternate
standards that are equally efficient.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs
and Service Center;
Community
Development – Building
General Fund IM
Action completed. The City of Cupertino adopted the 2019
update to the California Green Building Standards code, which
contains mandatory measures for water conservation both
inside buildings and in exterior landscaped areas. 2024 ‐
tracking requirements under AB 1572 to restrict watering of
non‐functional turf.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con85
PC 2-25-2025
85 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.11.3 Recycled Water System Continue to work with water retailers to promote and expand the availability of recycled water in the City
for public and private use.
Public Works –
Development Services None Required Con.
Not an action item. City has been working with SCVWD
regarding the expansion of reclaimed water systems through
Cupertino. Feasibility study recommended as a CWP item by
Sustainability Commission for FY24‐25.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.11.4
Recycled Water in
Projects
Encourage and promote the use of recycled water in public and private buildings, open space and
streetscape planting.
Public Works –
Development Services,
Capital Improvement
Program and Park
Improvement
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.11.5 On–site Recycled Water Encourage on‐site water recycling including rainwater harvesting and gray water use.
Public Works –
Development Services,
Environmental Services,
Capital Improvement
Program and Park
Improvement;
Sustainability Programs
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. In 2023, the Sustainability Division concluded a pilot
program which provided direct technical assistance promoting
rainwater harvesting and gray water use. Program not being
continued due to budget reductions.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.11.6
Water Conservation
Programs
Benchmark and continue to track the City’s public and private municipal water use to ensure ongoing
accountability and as a means of informing prioritization of future agency water conservation projects.
City Manager –
Sustainability Programs General Fund Con.
Majority of large landscape accounts are in WaterFluence
software which sets a water budget and reports for grounds
team. Golf Course is a notable exception which is being
addressed by Sustainability staff. In 2021, the City responded
to the drought by producing a series of internal water use
dashboards which were distributed on a regular basis to all
facilities and grounds staff, informing them of trends for all the
water use consumption billing history. The conservation and
awareness efforts continue from the 2021 drought period.
WATER Strategy ES‐
7.11.7
Green Business
Certification and Water
Conservation
Continue to support the City’s Green Business Certification goals of long–term water conservation within
City facilities, vegetated stormwater infiltration systems, parks and medians, including installation of
low–flow toilets and showers, parks, installation of automatic shut–off valves in lavatories and sinks and
water efficient outdoor irrigation.
Public Works –
Environmental Services,
Service Center, Capital
Improvement Program,
Sustainability Programs,
Community
Development
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation through the
Capital Improvement Program and Development Review and
through the Cityʹs Green Business Program. In 2022, the City re‐
certified itʹs real estate portfolio as Certified Green Businesses,
and is planning for additional ways to promote this program
for all business properties in the City. This is a partnership
with Economic Development, Sustainability Division, and the
County of Santa Clara. 2024‐ no change
REGIONAL
COORDINATION Policy HS ‐ 1.1 Regional Hazard Risk
Reduction Planning
Coordinate with Santa Clara County and local agencies to implement the Multi‐Juridictional Local Hazard
Mitigation Plan (LHMP) for Santa Clara County.
City Manager –
Emergency Services None Required Con.
Not an action item. Cupertino coordinates with Santa Clara
County OEM, who provides technical advice and support for
implementation of the LHMP through monthly general
meetings, as well as periodic LHMP specific trainings and
guidance. The update to the Multijurisdictional Hazard
Mitigation Plan (MJHMP) has been in progress since 2023 and
anticipated to be adopted in 2024.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con86
PC 2-25-2025
86 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy HS ‐
1.1.1
Monitoring and
Budgeting
Monitor and evaluate the success of the LHMP, including local strategies provided in Cupertino Annex
(Section 11). Working with Santa Clara County, ensure that strategies are prioritized and implemented
through the CIP and provide adequate budget for on–going programs and department operations.
City Manager –
Emergency Services None Required Con.
Santa Clara County OEM contracts with a specialist to support
both County and jurisdictional prioritization and
implementation of strategies, and tracking of the program. CIP
and budget are responsibility of each jurisdiction. OEM
implemented projects from other city plans including CIP and
CAP.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy HS ‐
1.1.2
Mitigation
Incorporation
Ensure that mitigation actions identified in the LHMP are being incorporated into upcoming City
sponsored projects, where appropriate.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Santa Clara County OEMʹs strategic vision
embraces the ʺWhole Communityʺ philosophy; providing each
jurisdiction with on‐ going opportunity to engage in the LHMP
process. Cupertino takes full advantage of these processes and
is typically ʹat the tableʹ providing city‐level support, review,
and feedback.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy HS‐
1.1.3
Hazard Mitigation Plan
Amendments and
Updates
Support Santa Clara County in its role as the lead agency that prepares and updates the LHMP. City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an Action Item. Ongoing coordination occuring. The
Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) is in the process of
being updated by MTC/ABAG. This document is considering
support for sea walls and levees to protect the low levels in the
Valley which would help protect infrastructure that provides
services to Cupertino such as water treatment plant and land
fills.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION Policy HS ‐ 1.2 Sea Level Rise
Protection Ensure all areas in Cupertino are adequately protected for the anticipated effects of sea level rise.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program
General Fund Con. Not an Action Item. Ongoing coordination occuring.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy HS‐
1.2.1
Monitor Rising Sea
Level
Regularly coordinate with regional, state, and federal agencies on rising sea levels in the San Francisco
Bay and major tributaries to determine if additional adaptation strategies should be implemented to
address flooding hazards. This includes monitoring FEMA flood map updates to identify areas in the City
susceptible to sea level rise, addressing changes to state and regional sea and Bay level rise estimates, and
coordinating with adjacent municipalities on flood control improvements as appropriate.
Public Works –
Development Services None Con. Not an Action Item. Ongoing coordination occuring.
REGIONAL
COORDINATION
Strategy HS ‐
1.2.2
Flood Insurance Rate
Maps
Provide to the public, as available, up–to–date Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) that identify rising sea
levels and changing flood conditions.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Not an Action Item. Ongoing coordination occuring.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con87
PC 2-25-2025
87 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS Policy HS ‐ 2.1 Promote Emergency
Preparedness
Distribute multi–hazard emergency preparedness information for all threats identified in the emergency
plan. Information will be provided through Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), First Aid and
Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) training, lectures and seminars on emergency
preparedness, publication of monthly safety articles in the Cupertino Scene, posting of information on the
Emergency Preparedness website and coordination of video and printed information at the library.
City Manger –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
CPR, First Aid, and CERT classes provided by the Santa Clara
County Fire Department (SCCFD). CERT training is communal
for the seven cities served by SCCFD. The Cupertino Scene
continues to feature articles on emergency preparedness,
public safety, and community awareness. The Scene’s calendar
section highlights upcoming emergency preparedness classes
and events. Printed material is maintained in the lobby of City
Hall and Quinlan Center. Advancements made in hazard
awareness and information sharing on
www.cupertino.org/emergency
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS Policy HS ‐ 2.2 Emergency Operations
and Training
Ensure ongoing training of identified City staff on their functions/ responsibilities in the EOC and in
disaster preparedness, first aid and CPR.
City Manger –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Staff are trained every two years in CPR,
with first aid training for Public Works. Staff is working on
providing first aid training to all staff. EOC staff receive EOC
training from the County and the City has started customized
trainings in‐house as well. A full, localized EOC training
program was implemented in 2023.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.2.1
Emergency Operations
Center (EOC)
Review options to provide functional and seismic upgrades to the EOC facility at City Hall or explore
alternative locations for the EOC.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund LR
City Hall building is seismically deficient and does not meet
“essential services” standards that are desired for an EOC.
Schedule to improve the building to this standard is unknown.
EOC functionality build‐out is continuing, including
upgrading monitors, IT systems support improvements,
replacement of chairs with safer alternatves, and evaluating
replacement tables. Recent remodeling at the Service Center
will make it more functional as the alternate site for the EOC.
Torre Avenue Annex building is being considered for an
alternative EOC location.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.2.2 Employee Training Conduct regular exercises and participate in regional exercises to ensure that employees are adequately
trained.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. The EOC partially exercises in
accompaniment with the annual County EOC exercise (itself
often part of a Bay Area regional exercise). With the turnover
of senior staff and EOC staff, initial training is occuring to lead
up to a City EOC exercise. Regular exercises and drills are
conducted with City staff, including participation in the Bay
Area regional exerices. In 2023, the City implemented an in‐
house exercise series to test the current EOP and develop
recommendations for a 2024 EOP revision.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con88
PC 2-25-2025
88 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS Policy HS ‐ 2.3 Volunteer Groups Continue to encourage the ongoing use of volunteer groups to augment emergency services, and clearly
define responsibilities during a local emergency.
City Manager –
Emergency Services None Required Con.
Not an action item. Continue to support the Cupertino Citizen
Corps (CCC) volunteer program and provide trainings and
exercises. CCC helps build the Cityʹs response capabilities and
designed to integrate with other City resources as appropriate.
For example, CCC integrated with City employees during
Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS) informational canvassing
efforts in Oct. ʹ19
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.3.1
Cupertino Citizen
Corps
Continue to support the Cupertino Amateur Radio Emergency Services (CARES), Community Emergency
Response Team (CERT) and Medical Reserve Corp (MRC) programs to ensure the development of
neighborhood based emergency preparedness throughout the City. Encourage ongoing cooperation with
CERTs in other cities.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. The City supports training and resource
requests from Cupertino Citizen Corps expanding
coordination and communications capability during a disaster.
CERT participates in countywide projects and exercises and
regularly attends countywide CERT Leadership Team (CCLT)
meetings. CARES regularly atends SCC RACES trainings,
leadership meetings, and regular commnication exercises.
MRC participates in regular trainings and City exercises.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.3.2 Community Groups Continue pre–disaster agreements with appropriate community groups to provide specified post–disaster
assistance, through the Emergency Service Coordinator and with the advice of the City Attorney.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. The City continues to partner with
community groups as appropriate such as the Red Cross and
CADRE.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.3.3 American Red Cross Continue to implement the American Red Cross agreements under the direction of the Director of
Emergency Services during a disaster.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. The City continues to implement
agreements with the American Red Cross.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.3.4 Shelter Provisions Continue the agreement with designated shelter sites to provide space for emergency supply containers.City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Existing shelter site agreements remain in
place. The storage container and supplies are in place at
Quinlan Community Center
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.3.5
Amateur Radio
Operators
Continue to support training and cooperation between the City and Cupertino Amateur Radio
Emergency Service (CARES) to prepare for emergency communications needs.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Training opportunities focused around
City events such as annual 5K runs, 4th of July event, and
various festivals. Response during Public Safety Power Shutoff
(PSPS) events in Oct. ʹ19 demonstrated coordination between
City employees and CCC (CARES, CERT, etc.).
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS Policy HS ‐ 2.4 Emergency Public
Information Maintain an Emergency Public Information program to be used during emergency situations.City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. City Communications has a system in
place. Developing an emergency
communications annex to the Emergency
Operations Base Plan (EOP) is a priority for OES in FY 20/21.
An Alert, Warning, and Notification program was
implemented in 2022.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.4.1
Communication
Methods
Use the local TV channel, Cupertino Alert System (CAS), the Internet and other communication methods
to transmit information to the citizenry.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
This is not an action item. Preparedness
information is published on tranditional media and social
media platforms. During periods of emergency and alert, these
notifications increase.
An emergency communications annex is in development to
include the various
communication methods.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con89
PC 2-25-2025
89 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.4.2
Public Information
Office
Activate the Public Information in coordination with the Sheriff and the Fire Department to provide
accurate information to the public as needed.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. This is coordinated by SCC Office of
Emergency Management (OEM) during periods of concern.
OEM hosts conference calls, which are used in part to
coordinate public information between the participants,
including the Sheriffʹs Office, the Fire Department, and
Cupertino OES.
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS Policy HS ‐ 2.5 Disaster Medical
Response
Continue to coordinate with the appropriate County agencies and local emergency clinics to ensure
preparedness and provide disaster medical response. Coordinate with the CERT member throughout the
City to ensure that they are prepared to provide emergency support and first aid at the neighborhood
level.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund
This is not an action item. The City continues to coordinate
with County Emergency Medical Services and the County
Public Health Department for awareness of their systems and
capabilities to provide disaster medical response. Existing
plans on getting response requests to County dispatch in the
case of a total communcations (telephone, mobile phone, etc.)
outage. Citizen Corps members are provided refresher first aid
training. This training is practiced during City public service
events (the 5K runs, Fourth of July, various festivals, etc.).
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS
Strategy HS ‐
2.5.1
Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU)
Develop a MOU with local emergency clinics. The County’s role and involvement in emergencies should
be considered in development of the MOU.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
This is not an action item. Although there are ʹfree‐
standingʹ physician offices in the City, there are no known
public emergency medical clinics in the City. Long‐term care
facilities, and any companion medical components, are
coordinated through, and supported by, the County
Emergency Medical Services Agency and the County Public
Health Department
EMERGENCY
PREPAREDNESS Policy HS ‐ 2.6 Military Facilities and
Readiness
Consider the impact of development on neighboring military facilities and maintain military airspace to
ensure military readiness.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
There are no abutting military facilities or airspace over
Cupertino.
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.1 Regional Coordination
Coordinate wildland fire prevention efforts with adjacent jurisdictions. Encourage the County and the
Midpeninsula Open Space District to implement measures to reduce fire hazards, including putting into
effect the fire reduction policies of the County Public Safety Element, continuing efforts in fuel
management, and considering the use of “green” fire break uses for open space lands.
Santa Clara County Fire General Fund Con.
The City participates in the Countyʹs Weed Abatement
program to ensure fire safety
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.2 Early Project Review Involve the Fire Department in the early design stage of all projects requiring public review to assure Fire
Department input and modification as needed.
Community
Development – Building
and Planning; Santa
Clara County Fire
General Fund Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.3 Emergency Access Ensure adequate emergency access is provided for all new hillside development.
Santa Clara County Fire;
Community
Development – Building
None Required Con.
Not an action item.Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con90
PC 2-25-2025
90 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
FIRE SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
3.3.1 Roadway Design Create an all–weather emergency road system to serve rural areas.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program;
Santa Clara County Fire
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
FIRE SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
3.3.2
Dead–End Street
Access
Allow public use of private roadways during an emergency for hillside subdivisions that have dead–end
public streets longer than 1,000 feet or find a secondary means of access.
Santa Clara County Fire;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
FIRE SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
3.3.3 Hillside Access Routes Require new hillside development to have frequent grade breaks in access routes to ensure a timely
response from fire personnel.
Santa Clara County Fire;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
FIRE SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
3.3.4
Hillside Road
Upgrades Require new hillside development to upgrade existing access roads to meet Fire Code and City standards.
Santa Clara County Fire;
Public Works –
Development Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.4
Private Residential
Electronic Security
Gates
Discourage the use of private residential electronic security gates that act as a barrier to emergency
personnel.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
FIRE SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
3.4.1 Location Require a fence exception for electronic security gates in certain areas.Community
Development – Planning None Required Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
FIRE SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
3.4.2 Access to Gates Where electronic security gates are allowed, require the installation of an approved key switch to be
accessed by the Fire District.
Community
Development – Building;
Santa Clara County Fire
None Required Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.5
Commercial and
Industrial Fire
Protection Guidelines
Coordinate with the Fire Department to develop new guidelines for fire protection for commercial and
industrial land uses.
Community
Development – Building General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal and
Fire Code.
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.6
Fire Prevention and
Emergency
Preparedness
Promote fire prevention and emergency preparedness through city–initiated public education programs,
the government television channel, the government television channel, the Internet, and the Cupertino
Scene.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. There is coordinated public education of
life safety conducted by the City, including Personal
Emergency Preparedness classes. Some information is also
provided on the City radio station (1670 AM). The Scene
periodically features articles regarding emergency
preparedness and fire safety.
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.7 Multi–Story Buildings Ensure that adequate fire protection is built into the design of multi–story buildings and require on–site
fire suppression materials and equipment.
Santa Clara County Fire;
Community
Development – Building
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented throught the Municipal and
Fire Codes.
FIRE SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 3.8 Extension of Water
Service
Encourage the water companies to extend water service into the hillside and canyon areas and encourage
cooperation between water utility companies and the Fire Department in order to keep water systems in
pace with growth and firefighting service needs.
Santa Clara County Fire;
Community
Development – Building
General Fund Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
PUBLIC SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 4.1 Neighborhood
Awareness Programs
Continue to support the Neighborhood Watch Program and other similar programs intended to help
neighborhoods prevent crime through social interaction.
City Manager – Public
Affairs General Fund Con.Not an action item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con91
PC 2-25-2025
91 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
PUBLIC SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 4.2
Crime Prevention
Through Building and
Site Design
Consider appropriate design techniques to reduce crime and vandalism when designing public spaces and
reviewing development proposals.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Park Improvement;
Community
Development – Planning
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
PUBLIC SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
4.2.1
Perimeter Roads for
Parks Encircle neighborhood parks with a public road to provide visual accessibility whenever possible.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Park Improvement
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
PUBLIC SAFETY Strategy HS ‐
4.2.2 Development Review Continue to request County Sheriff review and comment on development applications for security and
public safety measures.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
PUBLIC SAFETY Policy HS ‐ 4.3 Fiscal Impacts Recognize fiscal impacts to the County Sheriff and City of Cupertino when approving various land use
mixes.
Community
Development – Planning
and City Manager –
Economic Development
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS Policy HS ‐ 5.1 Seismic and Geologic
Review Process
Evaluate new development proposals within mapped potential hazard zones using a formal
seismic/geologic review process. Use Table HS ‐ 3 of this Element to determine the level of review
required.
Community
Development – Building
and Planning; Public
Works – Development
Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.1.1
Geotechnical and
Structural Analysis
Require any site with a slope exceeding 10% to reference the Landslide Hazard Potential Zone maps of the
State of California for all required geotechnical and structural analysis.
Community
Development – Building
and Planning; Public
Works – Development
Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.1.2 Residential Upgrades
Require that any residential facility, that is being increased more than 50% assessed value or physical size,
conform to all provisions of the current building code throughout the entire structure. Owners of
residential buildings with known structural defects, such as un–reinforced garage openings, “soft first
story” construction, unbolted foundations, or inadequate sheer walls are encouraged to take steps to
remedy the problem and bring their buildings up to the current building code.
Community
Development – Building
and Planning
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.1.3 Geologic Review Continue to implement and update geologic review procedures for Geologic Reports required by the
Municipal Code through the development review process.
Community
Development – Building
and Planning; Public
Works – Development
Services
None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS Policy HS ‐ 5.2 Public Education on
Seismic Safety
Reinforce the existing public education programs to help residents minimize hazards resulting from
earthquakes.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination/ education.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con92
PC 2-25-2025
92 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.2.1
Covenant on Seismic
Risk
Require developers to record a covenant to tell future residents in high–risk areas about the risk and
inform them that more information is in City Hall records. This is in addition to the State requirement that
information on the geological report is recorded on the face of subdivision maps.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.2.2
Emergency
Preparedness
Publish and promote emergency preparedness activities and drills. Use the City social media, and the
website to provide safety tips that may include identifying and correcting household hazards, knowing
how and when to turn off utilities, helping family members protect themselves during and after an
earthquake, recommending neighborhood preparation activities, and advising residents to maintain an
emergency supply kit containing first–aid supplies, food, drinking water and battery operated radios and
flashlights.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Presented in Personal
Emergency Preparedness classes offered by the
Cityʹs Office of Emergency Services. Distribution
of printed materials in the lobby of City Hall and
on the City website.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.2.3
Neighborhood
Response Groups
Encourage participation in CERT training. Train neighborhood groups to care for themselves during
disasters. Actively assist in neighborhood drills and safety exercises to increase participation and build
community support.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. The Santa Clara County Fire
Department provides CERT training for
community members. When requested by
neighborhood groups, Cupertinoʹs Office of
Emergency Services will present preparedness
information and support, including exercises. This
would include the Block Leader Program.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.2.4 Dependent Populations
As part of community–wide efforts, actively cooperate with State agencies that oversee facilities for
persons with disabilities and those with access and functional needs, to ensure that such facilities conform
to all health and safety requirements, including emergency planning, training, exercises and employee
education.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. As situations arise, the City cooperates
with State agencies overseeing facilities for those with
disabilities and access and functional needs.
GEOLOGIC AND
SEISMIC HAZARDS
Strategy HS ‐
5.2.5
Foreign Language
Emergency Information
Obtain translated emergency preparedness materials and make them available to appropriate foreign
language populations.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Foreign language emergency preparedness
information is available. During an emergency, the City has the
ability to translate materials and can also receive translation
support from the County.
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS Policy HS ‐ 6.1 Hazardous Materials
Storage and Disposal
Require the proper storage and disposal of hazardous materials to prevent leakage, potential explosions,
fire or the release of harmful fumes. Maintain information channels to the residential and business
communities about the illegality and danger of dumping hazardous material and waste in the storm drain
system or in creeks.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs; Santa Clara
County Fire
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review. Ongoing coordination/ education. 2024‐continued
promotion of county household hazardous waste program
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS Policy HS ‐ 6.2 Proximity of Residents
to Hazardous Materials
Assess future residents’ exposure to hazardous materials when new residential development or sensitive
populations are proposed in existing industrial and manufacturing areas. Do not allow residential
development or sensitive populations if such hazardous conditions cannot be mitigated to an acceptable
level of risk.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con93
PC 2-25-2025
93 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS Policy HS ‐ 6.3 Electromagnetic Fields
(EMF) Ensure that projects meet Federal and State standards for EMF emissions through development review.Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS Policy HS ‐ 6.4 Educational Programs
Continue to encourage residents and businesses to use non– and less– hazardous products, especially less
toxic pest control products, to slow the generation of new hazardous waste requiring disposal through the
county–wide program.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs
and Service Center
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing implementation. 2024‐ongoing
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS Policy HS ‐ 6.5 Hazardous Waste
Disposals
Continue to support and facilitate, for residences and businesses, a convenient opportunity to properly
dispose of hazardous waste.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing implementation. In January 2019,
the Cityʹs door to door Household Hazardous Waste (HHW)
Program dissolved and residents were redirected to utilize the
Countyʹs HHW drop‐off program. 2024‐ongoing
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Strategy HS ‐
6.5.1
Partner on Hazardous
Waste Collection and
Disposal
Continue to explore efficient, economical and convenient ways to offer Household Hazardous Waste
collection for residents in partnership with the Solid Waste contractor or the County.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing implementation.
HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS
Strategy HS ‐
6.5.2 Educational Materials Publish educational materials about the program in the Cupertino Scene, City website, and brochures that
are distributed throughout the community.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination/ education.
FLOODING Policy HS ‐ 7.1 Evacuation Map Prepare and update periodically an evacuation map for the flood hazard areas and distribute it to the
general public.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Service Center
General Fund Con.
Evacuation Map and Street signage has been prepared and
installed. Ongoing evaluation is occuring.
FLOODING Policy HS ‐ 7.2 Emergency Response to
Dam Failure Ensure that Cupertino is prepared to respond to a potential dam failure.
City Manager –
Emergency Services;
Public Works
General Fund Con.
Implemented through Strategies HS‐7.2.1 and HS‐ 7.2.2. The
Stevens Creek Dam Failure Plan was adopted in 2012 and a
comprehensive network of flood evacuation signs were placed
in late 2014 on streets that would be impacted from a dam
failure.
FLOODING Strategy HS ‐
7.2.1
Emergency and
Evacuation Plan
Maintain and update a Stevens Creek Dam Failure Plan, including alert, warning and notification systems
and appropriate signage.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund IM
Action completed. Adopted in 2012. Online at:
https://www.cupertino.org/home/showdocument? id=7424.
Alert, warning, notification are major components of these
plans.
FLOODING Strategy HS ‐
7.2.2
Inter–agency
Cooperation
Continue to coordinate dam–related evacuation plans and alert/notification systems with the City of
Sunnyvale, the SCVWD and Santa Clara County to ensure that traffic management between the agencies
facilities life safety. Also work with other neighboring cities to enhance communication and coordination
during a dam–related emergency.
City Manager –
Emergency Services General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Santa Clara Valley Water District revised
the Stevens Creek Dam Emergency Plan and provides annual
updates to alert, warning, and notifications processes. This will
facilitate updating the Cityʹs Dam Failure Plan, as well as the
coordination with SCVWD on dam damage survey efforts.
FLOODING Policy HS ‐ 7.3
Existing
Non–Residential Uses
in the Flood Plain
Allow commercial and recreational uses that are now exclusively within the flood plan to remain in their
present use or to be used for agriculture, provided it does not conflict with Federal, State and regional
requirements.
Public Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
None Required Con. Not an action item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con94
PC 2-25-2025
94 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
FLOODING Policy HS ‐ 7.4 Construction in Flood
Plains
Continue to implement land use, zoning and building code regulations limiting new construction in the
already urbanized flood hazard areas recognized by the Federal Flood Insurance Administrator.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Not an action item.
FLOODING Strategy HS ‐
7.4.1
Dwellings in Flood
Plains
Discourage new residential development in regulated flood plains. Regulate all types of redevelopment in
natural flood plains. This includes discouraging fill materials and obstructions that may increase flood
potential or modify the natural riparian corridors.
Public Works –
Development Services None Required Con.
Not an action item. Information provided to property owners/
applicants as needed.
FLOODING Strategy HS ‐
7.4.2
Description of Flood
Zone Regulation
Continue to maintain and update a map of potential flood hazard areas and a description of flood zone
regulations on the City’s website.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Ongoing coordination/ education.
FLOODING Strategy HS ‐
7.4.3
National Flood
Insurance Program
Community Rating
System
Continue to participate in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) Community Rating System
(CRS).
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Ongoing coordination.
FLOODING Policy HS ‐ 7.5 Hillside Grading
Restrict the extent and timing of hillside grading operations to April through October except as otherwise
allowed by the City. Require performance bonds during the remaining time to guarantee the repair of any
erosion damage. Require planting of graded slopes as soon as practical after grading is complete.
Public Works –
Development Services None Required Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
FLOODING Policy HS ‐ 7.6 Stability of Existing
Water Storage Facilities Assure the structural integrity of water storage facilities.Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund Con. Not an action item.
FLOODING Strategy HS ‐
7.6.1
Coordination with
other Agencies
Work closely with the San Jose Water Company and owners of other water storage facilities to develop
and implement a program to monitor the stability of all existing water storage facilities and related
improvements, such as: distribution lines, connections and other system components.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
NOISE Policy HS ‐ 8.1 Land Use Decision
Evaluation
Use the Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments chart, the Future Noise Contour
Map (see Figure D‐1 in Appendix D) and the City Municipal Code to evaluate land use decisions.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con. Not an action item.
NOISE Policy HS ‐ 8.2 Building and Site
Design Minimize noise impacts through appropriate building and site design.
Community
Development – Planning
and Building
None Required Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
NOISE Strategy HS ‐
8.2.1
Commercial Delivery
Areas
Locate delivery areas for new commercial and industrial developments away from existing or planned
homes.
Community
Development – Planning
and Building
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
NOISE Strategy HS ‐
8.2.2
Noise Control
Techniques
Require analysis and implementation of techniques to control the effects of noise from industrial
equipment and processes for projects new low‐intensity residential uses.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
NOISE Strategy HS ‐
8.2.3
Sound Wall
Requirements
Exercise discretion in requiring sound walls to be sure that all other measures of noise control have been
explored and that the sound wall blends with the neighborhood. Sound walls should be designed and
landscaped to fit into the environment.
Community
Development – Planning None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con95
PC 2-25-2025
95 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
NOISE Policy HS ‐ 8.3 Construction and
Maintenance Activities
Regulate construction and maintenance activities. Establish and enforce reasonable allowable periods of
the day, during weekdays, weekends and holidays for construction activities. Require construction
contractors to use the best available technology to minimize excessive noise and vibration from
construction equipment such as pile drivers, jack hammers, and vibratory rollers.
Community
Development – Planning
and Building
General Fund Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
NOISE Policy HS ‐ 8.4 Freeway Design and
Neighborhood Noise
Ensure that roads and development along Highway 85 and Interstate 280 are designed and improved in a
way that minimizes neighborhood noise.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
Capital
Improvement
Fund; General
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
NOISE Policy HS ‐ 8.5 Neighborhoods
Review residents’ needs for convenience and safety and prioritize them over the convenient movement of
commute or through traffic where practical.
Public Works –
Transportation
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed with project review/ Capital
Improvement Program.
NOISE Policy HS ‐ 8.6
Traffic Calming
Solutions to Traffic
Noise
Evaluate solutions to discourage through traffic in neighborhoods through enhanced paving and modified
street design.
Public Works –
Transportation
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
NOISE Strategy HS ‐
8.6.1 Local Improvement Modify street design to minimize noise impact to neighbors.Public Works –
Transportation
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
NOISE Policy HS ‐ 8.7
Reduction of Noise
from Trucking
Operations
Work to carry out noise mitigation measures to diminish noise along Foothill and Stevens Creek
Boulevards from the quarry and cement plant trucking operations. These measures include regulation of
truck speed, the volume of truck activity, and trucking activity hours to avoid late evening and early
morning. Alternatives to truck transport, specifically rail, are strongly encouraged when feasible.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination/ implementation.
NOISE Strategy HS ‐
8.7.1
Restrictions in the
County’s Use Permit
Coordinate with the County to restrict the noise of trucks, their speed and noise levels along Foothill and
Stevens Creek Boulevards, to the extent allowed in the Use Permit. Ensure that restrictions are monitored
and enforced by the County.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination/ implementation.
NOISE Strategy HS ‐
8.7.2
Road Improvements to
Reduce Truck Impacts
Consider road improvements such as medians, landscaping, noise attenuating asphalt, and other methods
to reduce quarry truck impacts.
Public Works –
Transportation General Fund con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination/ implementation.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy INF ‐ 1.1 Infrastructure Planning Upgrade and enhance the City’s infrastructure through the City’s Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
and requirements for development.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE
Strategy INF ‐
1.1.1
Capital Improvement
Program Ensure that CIP projects reflect the goals and policies identified in Community Vision 2040.Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Planning Commission annually reviews
the Capital Imp. Program for conformance with the General
Plan.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE
Strategy INF ‐
1.1.2 Design Capacity
Ensure that public infrastructure is designed to meet planned needs and to avoid the need for future
upsizing. Maintain a balance between meeting future growth needs and over–sizing of infrastructure to
avoid fiscal impacts or impacts to other goals.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program,
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund,
Grants Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination/ implementation.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con96
PC 2-25-2025
96 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE
Strategy INF ‐
1.1.3 Coordination
Require coordination of construction activity between various providers, particularly in City facilities and
rights–of–way, to ensure that the community is not unnecessarily inconvenienced. Require that providers
maintain adequate space for all utilities when planning and constructing their infrastructure.
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund,
Grants Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy INF ‐ 1.2 Maintenance Ensure that existing facilities are maintained to meet the commuity’s needs.Public Works – Service
Center
General Fund,
Grants Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Capital
Improvement Program, Engineering and maintenance
activities.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy INF ‐ 1.3 Coordination
Coordinate with utility and service providers to ensure that their planning and operations meet the City’s
service standards and future growth.
Public Works –
Development Services None Required con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE Policy INF ‐ 1.4 Funding Explore various strategies and opportunities to fund existing and future infrastructure needs.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented through the Capital
Improvement Program.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE
Strategy INF ‐
1.4.1 Existing Infrastructure Require developers to expand or upgrade existing infrastructure to increase capacity, or pay their fair
share, as appropriate.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Development Services
None Required Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE
Strategy INF ‐
1.4.2
Future Infrastructure
Needs
For new infrastructure, require new development to pay its fair share of, or to extend or construct,
improvements to accommodate growth without impacting service levels.
Public Works –
Development Services,
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
None Required con.
Not an action item. Implemented in conjunction with project
review. Environmental Services Division staff recommend
implementing an ordinance that requires private developers to
construct green stormwater infrastructure.
CITYWIDE
INFRASTRUCTURE
Strategy INF ‐
1.4.3 Economic Development Prioritize funding of infrastructure to stimulate economic development and job creation in order to
increase opportunities for municipal revenue.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
General Fund;
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Capital
Improvement Program.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Policy INF ‐ 2.1 Maintenance Maintain the City’s rights–of–way and traffic operations systems.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
General Fund;
Grants Con. Not an action item.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Policy INF ‐ 2.2 Multi–modal Systems Ensure that City rights–of–way are planned for a variety of transportation alternatives including
pedestrian, bicycle, automobile, as well as new technologies such as driverless cars, etc.
Public Works –
Transportation, Service
Center and Capital
Improvement Program
General Fund;
Grants Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Capital
Improvement Program and Bike/Ped Master plans.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Policy INF ‐ 2.3 Green Streets Explore the development of a “green streets” program to minimize stormwater runoff in City
rights–of–way.
Public Works –
Transportation,
Environmental Programs
and Capital
Improvement Program
General Fund;
Grants LR
Attempts have been made to identify a ʺgreen streetsʺ project
through the Capital Improvement Program. Ongoing.
Municipal Regional Permit requires continued effort to
evaluate all projects for Green Stormwater Infrastructure
opportunities. 2024‐ongoing
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Policy INF ‐ 2.4 Undergrounding
Utilities
Explore undergrounding of utilities through providers, public projects, private development and agency
funding programs and grants.
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund;
Grants Con.Not an action item. Implemeneted through the Capital
Improvement Program.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Strategy INF ‐
2.4.1
Public and Provider
Generated Projects
Require undergrounding of all new infrastructure projects constructed by public agencies and providers.
Work with providers to underground existing overhead lines.
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund;
Grants Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con97
PC 2-25-2025
97 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Strategy INF ‐
2.4.2 Development Require undergrounding of all utility lines in new developments and highly encourage undergrounding
in remodels or redevelopment of major projects.
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund;
Grants Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Policy INF ‐ 2.5 Recycled Water
Infrastructure Plan for citywide access to recycled water and encourage its use.Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con.
Attempts have been made to require development projects to
route recycled water to Stevens Creek Blvd. Opportunities to
expand the recycled water system into Cupertino are ongoing.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Strategy INF ‐
2.5.1 Availability Expand the availability of a recycled water system through public infrastructure projects and
development review.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program,
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.
Attempts have been made to require development projects to
route recycled water to Stevens Creek Blvd. Opportunities to
expand the recycled water system into Cupertino are ongoing.
Feasibility study recommended as a CWP item by
Sustainability Commission for FY24‐25.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Strategy INF ‐
2.5.2 Use Encourage private and public projects to incorporate the use of recycled water for landscaping and other
uses.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program
Con.
Attempts have been made to require development projects to
route recycled water to Stevens Creek Blvd and also to require
dual plumbing to allow use of recycled water.
RIGHTS–OF–WAY Strategy INF ‐
2.5.3 City Facilities Design and retrofit City buildings, facilities and landscaping to use recycled water, to the extent feasible.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Service Center
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. When recycled water services are
available, coordination will occur.
WATER Policy INF ‐ 3.1 Coordination with
Providers
Coordinate with water providers and agencies in their planning and infrastructure process to ensure that
the City continues to have adequate supply for current needs and future growth.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WATER Strategy INF ‐
3.1.1 Maintenance Coordinate with providers to ensure that water and recycled water delivery systems are maintained in
good condition.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WATER Policy INF ‐ 3.2 Regional Coordination
Coordinate with State and regional agencies to ensure that policies and programs related to water
provision and conservation meet City goals. Note: additional water conservation policies are discussed in
detail in the Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element.
Public Works –
Environmental
Programs; City Manager
Sustainability
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination, including
participation in regional water conservation efforts..
STORMWATER Policy INF ‐ 4.1 Planning and
Management
Create plans and operational policies to develop and maintain an effective and efficient stormwater
system.
Public Works – Sevice
Center and
Environmental Programs
General Fund Con.
Council adopted an updated Storm Drain Master Plan in Jan.
2019. Projects consistent with the Master Plan will be identified
for the Councilʹs consideration for inclusion in the CIP in
upcoming years. Vac truck puchased in 2022 to enable on‐
demand response and maintenance. In‐pipe rover with camera
purchased in 2023 to enable investigation of issues. 2024 ‐
conducted outfall assessment project
STORMWATER Strategy INF ‐
4.1.1 Management Reduce the demand on storm drain capacity through implementation of programs that meet and even
exceed on–site drainage requirements.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Environmental
Programs
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented in conjunction with project
review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con98
PC 2-25-2025
98 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
STORMWATER Strategy INF ‐
4.1.2 Infrastructure Develop a Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for the City’s storm drain infrastructure that meets the
current and future needs of the community.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund
IM/LR
Council adopted an updated Storm Drain Master Plan in Jan.
2019. Projects consistent with the Master Plan will be identified
for the Councilʹs consideration for inclusion in the CIP in
upcoming years
STORMWATER Strategy INF ‐
4.1.3 Maintenance Ensure that City’s storm drain infrastructure is appropriately maintained to reduce flood hazards through
implementation of best practices.
Public Works – Service
Center
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing maintenance . Storm Drain
Funding acquired through Clean Water and Storm Protection
Parcel Fee ballot measure in July 2019. Vac truck puchased in
2022 to enable on‐demand response and maintenance. In‐pipe
rover with camera purchased in 2023 to enable investigation of
issues.
STORMWATER Policy INF ‐ 4.2 Funding Develop permanent sources of funding stormwater infrastructure construction and maintenance.Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund IM
Action Completed. Storm Drain Funding acquired through
Clean Water and Storm Protection Parcel Fee ballot measure
in July 2019. Ongoing ‐ brought to Council annually for
renewal of both fees.
STORMWATER Strategy INF ‐
4.2.1 Ongoing Operations
Review other funding strategies to pay for the ongoing operations and maintenance of the storm drain
system per State and regional requirements. Note: additional policies that meet State and regional runoff
reduction are described in the Environmental Resources and Sustainability Element.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WASTEWATER Policy INF ‐ 5.1 Infrastructure
Ensure that the infrastructure plans for Cupertino’s waste water system providers continue to meet the
City’s current and future needs.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WASTEWATER Strategy INF ‐
5.1.1 Coordination
Coordination with the Cupertino Sanitary District on their Master Plan and the Sunnyvale Treatment
Plant to develop a comprehensive capital improvement program to ensure adequate capacity for future
development anticipated with General Plan buildout.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
WASTEWATER Strategy INF ‐
5.1.2 Development Require developers to pay their fair share of costs for, or in some cases construct, infrastructure upgrades
to ensure that service levels are met.
Public Works –
Development Services Con.Not an action item. Implemented in conjunction with project
review.
WASTEWATER Policy INF ‐ 5.2 Demand
Look for ways to reduce demand on the City’s wastewater system through implementation of water
conservation measures.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS Policy INF ‐ 6.1 Telecommunications
Master Plan
Maintain and update a Telecommunications Master Plan with regulations and guidelines for wireless and
emerging technologies.
Information
ServicesPublic Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning;
General Fund Pti. Wireless and Fiber Optic Master Plan has been prepared.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con99
PC 2-25-2025
99 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS Policy INF ‐ 6.2 Coordination Coordinate with providers to improve access and delivery of services to businesses and homes.
Information Services;
Public Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS
Strategy INF ‐
6.2.1 Facility Upgrades
When possible, require service providers to upgrade existing facilities as part of permit or lease renewals.
Encourage use of newer technologies that allow the facility components to be reduced in size or improve
screening or camouflaging.
Public Works –
Development Services;
Community
Development – Planning
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS
Strategy INF ‐
6.2.2 Improved Access Work with providers to expand service to areas that are not served by telecommunications technologies.
Information Services –
Communications; Public
Works – Development
Services;
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS
Strategy INF ‐
6.2.3 City Facilities Encourage leasing of City sites to expand access to telecommunications services. Develop standards for
the incorporation of telecommunications systems and public use.
Information Services;
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS
Strategy INF ‐
6.2.4
Agency and Private
Facilities
Encourage the installation of communications infrastructure in facilities owned by other public agencies
and private development.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
Telecommunications facilities proposed for the Sports Center
were requested by Council to be relocated.
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS
Strategy INF ‐
6.2.5
Communications
Infrastructure Support the extension and access to telecommunications infrastructure such as fiber optic cables.Public Works –
Development Services General Fund LR
Wireless and Fiber Optic Master Plan has been prepared.
Planning Commision recommended in the 2020 General Plan
Annual Report process that the City establish consistent
aesthetic standards for 5G infrastructure for all carriers.
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS Policy INF ‐ 6.3 Emerging Technologies Encourage new and innovative technologies and partner with providers to provide the community with
accesss to these services.Information Services General Fund LR
The Information Services team has implemented several
technologies in the City since adoption of the 2015 General
Plan. These include the 311 service software, and Accela for
permit review
TELE‐
COMMUNICATIONS
Strategy INF ‐
6.3.1
Strategic Technology
Plan Create and update a Strategic Technology Plan for the City to improve service efficiency.Information Services –
Information Technology General Fund IM
Implementation of current three year Strategic Technology
Plan began in Oct 2017. All projects in this plan have been
completed or will be complete by September 2020. Strategic
Technology plans are available online at:
www.cupertino.org/home/showdocument?id=169 66.
SOLID WASTE Policy INF ‐ 7.1 Providers
Coordinate with solid waste system providers to utilize the latest technology and best practices to
encourage waste reduction and meet, and even, exceed State targets.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.
Ongoing coordination and is included as a performance
measure in the Cityʹs Waste Hauler Franchise Agreement. In
May 2023, Council approved including processing of
Municipal Solid Waste for removal of recycable and
compostable materials as part of the search for new post‐
collection waste disposition services. 2024‐worked on post‐
collection services options with plan to bring options to
Council in 2025.
SOLID WASTE Policy INF ‐ 7.2 Facilities
Ensure that public and private developments build new and on–site facilities and/or retrofit existing
on–site facilities to meet the City’s waste diversion requirements.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented in conjunction with project
review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con10
0
PC 2-25-2025
100 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
SOLID WASTE Policy INF ‐ 7.3 Operations
Encourage public agencies and private property owners to design their operations to exceed regulatory
waste diversion requirements.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination. Implemented in
conjunction with project review.
SOLID WASTE Strategy INF ‐
7.3.1
City Facilities and
Events
Design new City facilities and retrofit existing facilities and event venues with recycling and trash
collection bins to facilitate easy disposal of recyclable and compostable waste by staff and the public.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs
and Capital
Improvement Program
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented in conjunction with project
review. Work continued in 2021 to develop a citywide Zero
Waste Plan. Waste reduction goals captured in Climate Action
Plan 2.0.
SOLID WASTE Policy INF ‐ 7.4 Product Stewardship Per the City’s Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) policy, support statewide and regional EPR
initiatives and legislation to reduce waste and toxins in products, processes and packaging.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE Policy INF ‐ 8.1 Reducing Waste Meet or exceed Federal, State and regional requirements for solid waste diversion through
implementation of programs.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination. Diversion
requirements captured in franchised hauling agreement and
municipal code. Waste reduction and diversion goals also
captured in Climate Action Plan 2.0. Ongoing work to meet
the requirements of SB1383.
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE
Strategy INF ‐
8.1.1 Outreach Conduct and enhance programs that promote waste reduction through partnerships with schools,
institutions, businesses and homes.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination. Food waste
diversion pilot planning began in 2023 with CUSD. Outreach
and coordination with other institutions and large employers
ongoing per the requirements of SB1383 and local ordinance.
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE
Strategy INF ‐
8.1.2 Hazardous Waste Work with providers and businesses to provide convenient hazardous and e–waste facilities for the
community.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE
Strategy INF ‐
8.1.3 Preferential Purchasing Maintain and update a City preferential purchasing policy to products that reduce packaging waste,
greenhouse gas emissions, toxic contaminants and are reusable.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs
and City Manager –
Sustainability
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination. 2024‐planning to
pursue update of environmentally preferable purchasing
policy in 2025
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE
Strategy INF ‐
8.1.4 Reuse
Encourage reuse of materials and reusable products. Develop a program for reuse of materials and
reusable products in City facilities and outreach programs for community–wide participation by
promoting community–wide garage sales and online venues.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE
Strategy INF ‐
8.1.5 Collaboration Collaborate with agencies and large businesses or projects to enhance opportunities for community–wide
recycling, reuse and reduction programs.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE
Strategy INF ‐
8.1.6 Construction Waste Encourage recycling and reuse of building materials during demolition and construction of City, agency
and private projects.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination. Current municipal
code requires 65% or more of mixed construction and
demolition debris be diverted from landfill from qualifying
projects. As of 2023, require use of Green Halo material
tracking online service for reporting of materials generated and
their disposal diversion rates. 2024‐ongoing
REDUCE, REUSE AND
RECYCLE
Strategy INF ‐
8.1.7 Recycled Materials Encourage the use of recycled materials and sustainably harvested materials in City, agency and private
projects.
Public Works –
Environmental Programs
and Capital
Improvement Program
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Implemented in conjunction with project
review. City purchasing of materials is subject to the
Environmental Purchasing Policy. Ongoing
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con10
1
PC 2-25-2025
101 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE Policy RPC ‐ 1.1 Parks and Recreation
Master Plan
Prepare a citywide Parks and Recreation Master Plan that outlines policies and strategies to plan for the
communities open space and recreational needs.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services; Public
Works – Park
Improvement
General Fund IM
Completed ‐ Adopted by the City Council on February 18.
2020.
PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE
Strategy RPC ‐
1.1.1
Stevens Creek Corridor
Master Plan
Prepare a master plan for the park and open space corridor along Stevens Creek including McClellan
Ranch, McClellan Ranch West, Blackberry Farm, the Blackberry Farm golf course, Stocklmeir and Blesch
properties and the Nathan Hall Tank House area.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services; Public
Works – Park
Improvement
General Fund LR Anticipated to be intiated after 2025
PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE
Strategy RPC ‐
1.1.2
Civic Center Master
Plan
Prepare a master plan that addresses the needs of the elements in the Civic Center area including City
Hall, Community Hall, Library Field, Library programming, function and meeting space and community
gathering space and parking needs.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Park Improvement
General Fund IM/LR
Civic Center Master Plan provides guidance on capital projects
in this node. Library expansion project was included in the
Civic Center Master Plan and was constructed in 2021.
PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE Policy RPC ‐ 1.2 Parkland Standards Continue to implement a parkland acquisition and implementation program that provides a minimum of
three acres per 1,000 residents.
Public Works –
Development Services
General Fund;
Developer Fees Con. Not an action item.
PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE
Strategy INF ‐
1.2.1 Park Size
Require target for parks based on function and activity supported as part of the Parks and Recreation
Master Plan. While the preferred size for most neighborhood parks is about 3.5 acres for flexibility of use,
smaller size parks may be considered based on opportunities and circumstances.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services; Public
Works – Park
Improvement
General Fund Con.Not an action item.
PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE
Strategy RPC ‐
1.2.2
Amend Parkland
Standard
Explore increasing the parkland standard to five acres per 1,000 residents as part of the citywide Parks
and Recreation Master Plan.
Public Works – Park
Improvement General Fund LR
No action has been taken with regard to this strategy. This is
an aspirational goal. The Parks Master Plan does not propose
any change to the current 3 acre/1000 residents standard.
PARKS AND OPEN
SPACE Policy RPC ‐ 1.3 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP)
Ensure that CIP projects reflect the goals and policies identified in the Community Vision 2040,
establishing a criteria for ranking CIP proposals for the highest and best selection of community projects.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund Con. Not an action item.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Policy 2.1 Parkland Acquisition
The City’s parkland acquisition strategy should be based upon three broad objectives:
*Distributing parks equitably throughout the City;
*Connecting and providing access by providing paths, improved pedestrian and bike connectivity and
signage; and
*Obtaining creek lands and restoring creek and other natural open space areas, including strips of land
adjacent to creeks that may be utilized in creating buffer areas, trails and trail amenities.
Public Works – Park
Improvement, Capital
Improvement Program
and Development
Services
General Fund;
Developer Fees Con.
Not an action item. The Parks Master Plan in
consideration include Park Equity Heat Maps to
indicate park deficient areas
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.1.1 Dedication of Parkland New developments, in areas where parkland deficiencies have been identified, should be required to
dedicate parkland rather than paying in–lieu fees.
Public Works –
Development Services General Fund Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con10
2
PC 2-25-2025
102 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.1.2
Public Use of School
Sites
Zone all public school sites for public use to allow for the public to use sites, when not in use by schools,
through shared arrangements.
Public Works – Service
Center General Fund Con.
Most school sites have joint use agreements in place to allow
use of open spaces. The City looks for additional agreements as
the opportunities arise.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.1.3
Acquisition of Surplus
Properties
Explore acquisition of surplus school and agency properties for parkland. Take advantage of the Naylor
Act to purchase surplus school sites.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Park Improvement
General Fund Con.Not an action item.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐ 2.2 Private Open Space and
Recreation Facilities
Encourage the continued existence and profitability of private open space and recreation facilities through
incentives and development controls.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con. Implemented through Strategies RPC‐2.2.1 and RPC 2.2.2
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.2.1 Existing Facilities Encourage the continued existence of private recreational facilities through land use zoning and
incentives.
Community
Development – Planning General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Existing zoning allows private recreational
facilities to be a conforming use.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.2.2 New Facilities
*Require major developments to incorporate private open space and recreational facilities, and seek their
cooperation in making the spaces publicly accessible.
*Where feasible, ensure park space is publicly accessible (as opposed to private space).
*Encourage active areas to serve community needs. However, a combination of active and passive areas
can be provided based on the setting.
*Integrate park facilities into the surroundings.
*If public parkland is not dedicated, require park fees based on a formula that considers the extent to
which the publicly–accessible facilities meet community need.
Community
Development – Planning;
Public Works –
Development Services
Con. Not an action item. Implemented through the Municipal Code.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐2.3 Parkland Distribution
Strive for an equitable distribution of parks and recreational facilities through the City. Park acquisition
should be based on the following priority list. Accessibility to parks should be a component of the
acquisition plan.
High Priority: Parks in neighborhoods or areas that have few or no park and recreational areas.
Medium Priority: Parks in neighborhoods that have other agency facilities such school fields and districts
facilities, but no City parks.
Low Priority: Neighborhoods and areas that have park and recreational areas which may be slightly less
than the adopted City’s parkland standard.
Private Development: Consider pocket parks in new and renovated projects to provide opportunities for
publicly–accessible park areas.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program
General Fund,
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐ 2.4 Connectivity and
Access
Ensure that each home is within a half–mile walk of a neighborhood park or community park with
neighborhood facilites; ensure that walking and biking routes are reasonably free of physical barriers,
including streets with heavy traffic; provide pedestrian links between parks, wherever possible; and
provide adequate directional and site signage to identify public parks.
Public Works –
Development Services,
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program; Community
Development – Planning
General Fund,
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action iem. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review to the extent allowed by State law.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con10
3
PC 2-25-2025
103 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.4.1
Pedestrian and Bicycle
Planning
Implement recommendations in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans to link employment and special areas,
and neighborhood to services including parks, schools and neighborhood shopping.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
General Fund;
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.4.2 Signage Adopt and maintain a master signage plan for all public parks to ensure adequate and consistent signage
is provided to identify public recreational areas.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
General Fund;
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐ 2.5 Range of Park
Activities Provide parks and recreational facilities for a variety of recreational activities.
Public Works – Park
Improvement; Parks and
Recreation – Business
Services
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination and planning.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.5.1 Special Needs Extend recreational opportunities for special needs groups (senior, disabled, visually–challenged, etc.) by
making improvements to existing facilities and trails.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services; Public
Works – Park
Improvement
General Fund,
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program. Jollyman All Inclusive
Play Area to be completed in 2024.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.5.2 Recreational Facilities Explore the possibility of providing additional access to existing facilities such as gymnasiums, swimming
pools and tennis courts.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services General Fund LR
On March 2, 2021, City Council reviewed the current status of
the RRRPD City Work Program item and unanimously carried
the motion to delay the consideration of the annexation of the
district until RRRPD completed their strategic visioning and
outreach process and the RRRPD Board of Directors made a
formal recommendation on the subject of City acquisition and
annexation. In addition, the delay would allow for community
engagement in long‐term planning for aquatics facilities in
Cupertino.
Memo was send to City Council November 2021 stating
RRRPDs and community survey results showing opposition to
the City aquisition of RRRPD. No further action taken.
ACQUISITION,
DISTRIBUTION AND
RANGE OF SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
2.5.3 Community Gardens Encourage community gardens, which provide a more livable environment by controlling physical factors
such as temperature, noise and pollution.
Parks and Recreation –
Outdoor Recreation &
Youth Development;
Public Works – Park
Improvement
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Capital Improvement Program completed
Community Gardens at McClellan Ranch and Wilson Park and
is looking at other opportunities elsewhere in the City.
PRESERVATION Policy RPC ‐ 3.1 Preservation of Natural
Areas
Design parks to utilize natural features and the topography of the site in order to protect natural features
and keep maintenance costs low.
Public Works – Parks
Improvement and
Capital Improvement
Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
PRESERVATION Strategy RPC ‐
3.1.1 Native Planting Maximize the use of native plants and drought–tolerant planting.
Public Work – Capital
Improvement Program,
Service Center and Park
Improvement
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/Capital Improvement Program and ongoing
maintenance activities.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con10
4
PC 2-25-2025
104 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
PRESERVATION Strategy RPC ‐
3.1.2 Natural Habitat Where possible, restore and provide access to creeks and riparian habitat.
Public Work – Capital
Improvement Program,
Service Center and Park
Improvement
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
PRESERVATION Strategy RPC ‐
3.1.3 Nature Play Areas Where appropriate, consider establishing Nature Play Areas in lieu of the more conventional play
equipment.
Public Works – Park
Improvement
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
INTEGRATION Policy RPC ‐ 4.1 Recreational Intensity Design parks appropriate to address the facility and recreational programming required by each special
area and neighborhood based on current and future plans for the areas.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
INTEGRATION Policy RPC ‐ 4.2 Park Safety Design parks to enhance public safety by providing visibility to the street and access for public safety
responders.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program General Fund Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
TRAILS Policy RPC ‐ 5.1 Open Space and Trail
Linkages
Dedicate or acquire open space land along creeks and utility through regional cooperation, grants and
private development review.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Capital
Improvement Program;
Community
Development – Planning
General
Fund/Grants Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
TRAILS Strategy RPC ‐
5.1.1
Pedestrian and Bike
Planning
Implement recommendations in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan that link trails and open space to
neighborhoods and special areas.
Public Works –
Transportation
Capital
Improvement
Fund/Grants
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
TRAILS Strategy RPC ‐
5.1.2 Trail Projects
Implement trail projects described in this Element; evaluate any safety, security and privacy impacts and
mitigations associated with trail development; and work with affected neighbors in locating trails to
ensure that their concerns are appropriately addressed.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund/Grants
Con.Not an action item. Implemented through the Bike/Ped Master
Plan. E.g. Regnart Creek Trail.
TRAILS Strategy RPC ‐
5.1.3
Dedicated Trail
Easements
Require dedication or easements for trails, as well as their implementation, as part of the development
review process, where appropriate.
Public Works –
Development Services
and Transportation
General Fund;
Developer fees Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
TRAILS Strategy RPC ‐
5.1.4 Joint Use Agreement Establish a Joint Use Agreement with the SCVWD that enhances the implementation of a trail program
which increases the use of, and sets standards and measures for, creek trails.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Transportation
General Fund Con. Established on an as‐needed basis. E.g. Regnart Creek Trail.
TRAILS Policy RPC ‐ 5.2 Pedestrian and Bicycle
Paths
Develop a citywide network of pedestrian and bicycle pathways to connect employment center, shopping
areas and neighborhoods to services including parks, schools, libraries and neighborhood centers.
Public Works –
Transportation and
Capital Improvement
Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund/Grants
Con.Not an action item. Implmented through the Bike/Ped Master
Plans.
RECREATION
PROGRAMS AND
SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐ 6.1 Diverse Programs Ensure that the City continues to offer a wide range of programs to serve diverse populations of all ages
and abilities.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services General Fund Con. Not an action item.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con10
5
PC 2-25-2025
105 of 106
Topic Policy/ Strategy
No.Policy/Strategy Title General Plan Policy/Strategy Text Responsible
Department(s)
Funding
Source(s)Timeframe Comment
RECREATION
PROGRAMS AND
SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐ 6.2 Partnerships
Enhance the City’s recreational programs and library service through partnerships with other agencies
and non–profit organizations. Maintain and strengthen existing agreements with agencies and non–profit
organizations, including the Library District, to ensure progressive excellence in the facilities, programs,
and services provided to the diverse and growing Cupertino population.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services; City
Manager
General Fund Con. Not an action item.
RECREATION
PROGRAMS AND
SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐ 6.3 Art and Culture Utilize parks as locations of art and culture and to educate the community about the City’s history, and
explore the potential to use art in facilities and utilities when located in parks.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
and Development
Services; Parks and
Recreation – Business
Services
General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with project
review/ Capital Improvement Program.
RECREATION
PROGRAMS AND
SERVICES
Policy RPC ‐ 6.4 Library Service Encourage the library to continue to improve service levels by incorporating new technology and
expanding the library collections and services. City Manager General Fund Con.
Not an action item. Ongoing coordination. The Library
expansion was completed in 2022.
SUSTAINABLE AND
FLEXIBLE Policy RPC ‐ 7.1 Sustainable Design Ensure that City facilities are sustainably designed to minimize impacts on the environment.Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with Capital
Improvement Program.
SUSTAINABLE AND
FLEXIBLE Policy RPC ‐ 7.2 Flexibility Design facilities to be flexible to address changing community needs.Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with Capital
Improvement Program.
SUSTAINABLE AND
FLEXIBLE Policy RPC ‐ 7.3 Maintenance Design facilities to reduce maintenance, and ensure that facilities are maintained and upgraded
adequately.
Public Works – Capital
Improvement Program
Capital
Improvement
Fund
Con.Not an action item. Reviewed in conjunction with Capital
Improvement Program.
COMMUNITY
SERVICES Policy RPC ‐ 8.1 School Districts Partner with school districts to allow community use of their sports fields and facilities.
Public Works – Service
Center; Parks and
Recreation – Business
Services
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
COMMUNITY
SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
8.1.1 Shared Facilities Maintain and enhance arrangements with schools for the use of sports fields, theaters, meeting spaces and
other facilities through maintenance agreements and other partnerships.
Parks and Recreation –
Business Services; Public
Works – Service Center
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
COMMUNITY
SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
8.1.2 School Expansion Encourage schools to meet their expansion needs without reducing the size of their sports fields.
Public Works – Service
Center; Parks and
Recreation – Business
Services
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
COMMUNITY
SERVICES
Strategy RPC ‐
8.1.3 School Facility Needs Collaborate with schools on their facility needs through sharing of development information and
partnerships through major development projects.
Community
Development – Planning;
City Manager
General Fund Con. Not an action item. Ongoing coordination.
Ongoing = Grey, Completed = Green, In‐Progress = Yellow , Pending = Orange Timeframe: Immediate (2019‐2022) = IM, Long Range (2022‐2040) = LR, Continual = Con10
6
PC 2-25-2025
106 of 106