10-17-2024 Agenda Item #2 Desk Item PV Design Installation Plus Attachments CITY OF
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 • FAX: (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO CUPERTINO.ORG
SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
DESK ITEM
Meeting: October 17, 2024
Agenda Item#2
Subject
Capital Improvement Program Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation project.
Recommended Action
Recommend that City Council approve the Capital Improvement Program
Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation project's conceptual design for five City
facilities: Cupertino Library, Community Hall, Cupertino Sports Center,Blackberry
Farm, and Quinlan Community Center.
Background:
Staff added financial information to the staff report. Attachments include the
redlined and clean versions of the staff report, as well as an additional table in
Attachment D.
Attachments Provided with Original Staff Report:
A. —FY 24-25 CIP Project Narratives Excerpt
Additional Attachments Provided with Desk Item:
B. Redlined Staff Report with Changes
C. Clean Staff Report with Changes
D. PV Project Cost Savings
Attachment B
CITY OF
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 • FAX: (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO CUPERTINO.ORG
SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Meeting: October 17, 2024
Subject
Capital Improvement Program Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation project
Recommended Action
Recommend that City Council approve the Capital Improvement Program Photovoltaic
Systems Design and Installation project's conceptual design for five City facilities:
Cupertino Library, Community Hall, Cupertino Sports Center, Blackberry Farm, and
Quinlan Community Center.
Executive Summary
This report provides scope and fiscal information on each proposed site of the
Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation(PV) Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
project.
Background Information
The PV project was approved by the City Council as part of the Fiscal Year (FY)24-25
annual budget. The PV project description included in the budget adoption and meeting
details is attached (Attachment A).
The Net Energy Metering (NEM)program is administered by the California Public
Utilities Commission and provides credits to a building's utility bill for producing
excess on-site clean energy over a 20-year period. In 2023 PG&E announced a rate
decrease for electricity generated by photovoltaic (PV) systems (NEM 3)but provided a
window to allow grandfathering the more economically attractive NEM 2.0 rates if
interconnection applications were successfully submitted and corresponding systems
operational by 2026.
Reasons for Recommendation
NEM 2.0 Interconnection Applications were successfully submitted to PG&E for five
Cupertino facilities:Blackberry Farm Recreation and Pool facility, Community Hall,
Cupertino Library, Quinlan Community Center, and Cupertino Sports Center. This
Project aims to design and build PV systems at all five locations.
NEM 2.0 projects must be completed by April 15,2026 to receive the incentive.
Otherwise, the NEM 3.0 program, that offers reduced incentives/savings,would need to
be pursued. NEM 2.0 provides 75-80% greater compensation than NEM 3 rates for
electricity that is fed back into the electrical system. The savings in utility costs are
projected to be$500,000 annually, and$4-7-.8 26.5 million over a 30yr lifespan. For more
detail, please see attachment B.
The City CIP staff is compiling a Conceptual Design Report that includes technical and
cost analysis data for each site. The following narratives from that report depict the
proposed layouts and projected cost savings at each site.
Cupertino Library
A number of options were considered for this site. The Library roof locations have an
advantageous size,but only one of the large roofs is well-oriented to the west or south.
Standing seam rooftops (supporting the two largest rooftop arrays) are ideal for
supporting solar, as racking can be clamped to the standing seams as opposed to
penetrating the roof surface. Long trenching/boring routes will be required to
consolidate generation at point of interconnection. While the proposed carport locations
took the trees into consideration, some smaller trees will need to be removed or
significantly trimmed to support the installation.
The electrical bill at the Library would be reduced from-$325K annually to-$120K
annually, with projected lifecycle savings of$11.7 million. The City's costs for design
and construction of$2.6 million could be recouped in approximately 11 years.
The complication for the Library site is that the tenant, the Santa Clara County Library
District(SCCLD), pays the electrical bill. The fiscal benefit of the cost savings from the
photovoltaic installation would go to the SCCLD for the next twenty years. The payback
period for the project would be extended accordingly.
1
fto
- ;*4 *�Y
r' MWWI
s L „
i
Uesig Library!Civic Center ip . 5
Uc Nameplate 422.8 kW
f
AC Nameplate 403.0 kW(1.05 DC1AC}
j�J �i '! -
Library Meter#1932850108
Last 12 months kWh usage 1,048,978 Construction Cost- PV only $3,801,000
Last 12 months cost of electrical $322,517 Construction Cost- EV only $300,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.31 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $4,101,000
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback(IRA)funding (40%,
621477 PV only) $1,520,400
PV systems annual savings* $202,501 City Funding $2,580,600
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
$120,016 cash flow) 10.65
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $11,701,727 ROI 453%
Blackberry Farm Recreation and Pool facility
A number of options were considered for this site. The building roof locations are too
small for a simple installation, and the solar orientation is not ideal. The proposed layout
is a single continuous system that requires fewer trenching/boring paths to the electrical
point of interconnection. The installation is far enough from trees that tree trimming will
not be needed to ensure solar access, and existing netting system will protect array from
golf balls. With system shading parking stalls, proportional shade coverage will need to
be provided on ADA parking stalls. The State and Cupertino green energy code for EV
parking requirements are under review and may be substantial.
The electrical bill at Blackberry Farm would be reduced from costing-$33K annually to
generating a revenue of almost$6K annually(because the PV system would generate
slightly more than the demand, and thus selling power back to PG&E). The lifecycle
savings are projected to be$1.6 million. The City's costs for design and construction of
$675K could be recouped in approximately 14 years.
rr
yy k
Y,
f'
Design Blackberry Farm Carport r
DC Nameplate 73.1 kW
AC Nameplate 60.0 kW(1.22 DQAQ
Meter#114315284
Last 12 months kWh usage 110,428 Construction Cost- PV only $955,500
Last 12 months cost of electrical $32,539 Construction Cost- EV only $100,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.29 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $1,055,500
PV systems kWH generation
Direct Payback(IRA)funding(40%,
110948 PV only) $382,200
PV systems annual savings* $38,253 City Funding $673,300
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
-$5,714 cash flow) 13.99
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $1,587,032 ROI 236%
Quinlan Community Center
A number of options were considered for this site. Preserving significant trees and
working within the aesthetics of the park were high priorities. This layout provides
maximal shaded parking and significantly shaded picnic area. Utilizes existing roof
areas, mitigating overall costs of the system. Northern carport will require some tree
trimming(overall tree health will not be compromised,however) to maintain solar
access and may require shade be provided for some existing ADA stalls. The picnic area
structure will be designed to respond architecturally to the layout of the picnic area
(rather than one large single shed roof as shown in the illustration).
The electrical bill at Quinlan would be reduced from costing-$122K annually to
generating a revenue of almost$33K annually(because the PV system would generate
slightly more than the demand, and thus selling power back to PG&E). The lifecycle
savings are projected to be$7.4 million. The City's costs for design and construction of
$1.6 million could be recouped in approximately 9 years.
t
o
aeslp Quinlan Community Center
6CNameplate all kW �9
h AC Nameplate 773.E k'N f 1 i D71A(_) y
Quinlan Center Meter#0116367009- 116367840
Last 12 months kWh usage 383,109 Construction Cost- PV only $2,341,500
Last 12 months cost of electrical $121,336 Construction Cost- EV only $150,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.32 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $2,491,500
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback(IRA)funding(40%,
453795 PV only) $936,600
PV systems annual savings* $154,217 City Funding $1,554,900
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
-$32,881 cash flow) 8.85
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $7,398,086 RO1 476%
Cupertino Sports Center
This system is well-aligned to the west and south-facing solar access.The northern array
is split around north-south site access path to allow for any traffic which could interfere
with the carport array. The tree in the corner between the two arrays would ideally be
slightly trimmed to ensure maximum solar access, and trees under the northern arrays
would need to be removed.
The electrical bill at the Sports Center would be reduced from—$108K annually to~$15K
annually,with projected lifecycle savings of$4.5 million. The City's costs for design and
construction of$1.3 million could be recouped in approximately 11 years.
. .� lei .a
Design spons center carpons
Pi Nameplate 214 0 kW
AC Nameplate 172.0kW(1,24DVAQ
Sports Center A Meter#0116367009- 116971849
Last 12 months kWh usage 329,369 Construction Cost- PV only $1,812,300
Last 12 months cost of electrical $108,143 Construction Cost- EV only $150,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.33 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $1,962,300
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback(IRA)funding(40%,
322104 PV only) $724,920
PV systems annual savings* $93,047 City Funding $1,237,380
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
$15,096 cash flow) 11.06
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $4,511,620 ROI 365%
Community Hall
This is an ideally oriented system with rooftop racking. Roof penetrations will not be
required, as the system will be able to clamp to the existing standing seam roof profile.
The electrical bill at Community Hall would be reduced from-$40K annually to-$10K
annually, with projected lifecycle savings of$1.3 million. The City's costs for design and
construction of$1.3 million could be recouped in approximately 7 years.
4 e
i D
� C
r
i Design Community Hall Rooftop
DC Nameplate 49.3 kW "
AC Nameplate 5M kW(0.99 DC/AQ
nity Hall 116367009 -
Last 12 months kWh usage 114,600 Construction Cost- PV only $376,950
Last 12 months cost of electrical $39,810 Construction Cost- EV only $0
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.35 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $376,950
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback(IRA)funding(40%,
66784 PV only) $150,780
PV systems annual savings* $29,441 City Funding $226,170
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
$10,369 cash flow) 7.13
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $1,336,267 ROI 591%
The next steps for the project,pending Council's approval of the design-build project
delivery method, are:
1. Review of the photovoltaic systems for the five City facilities with Parks and
Recreation Commission(11/07/24), and the Community (10/29/24).
2. City Council meeting in December 2024 for approval of the design intent for each
facility.
Sustainability Impact
Adding solar generation reduces demand on the electrical grid and provides a
foundation to support future electrification of these facilities, which would be achieved
by transitioning to electric appliances. Electrification of existing buildings is a goal under
Measure BE-3 in the City's Climate Action Plan 2.0.
Fiscal Impact
The Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation(budget unit 420-99-274)was
approved as part of the FY 2024-25 Budget at$6,300,000. There are no recommended
changes to the budget.
California Environmental Quality Act
The Project is Categorically Exempt as Class 1, Existing Facilities Under the California
Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 and on a Separate and
Independent Basis is Exempt as Class 3, Construction of Small Structures,Under CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301.
Prepared by: Susan Michael, Capital Improvement Program Manager
Reviewed by: Chad Mosley, Director of Public Works
Attachments:
A—FY 24-25 CIP Project Narratives Excerpt
B -Redlined Staff Report with Changes
C-Clean Staff Report with Changes
D—PV Project Cost Savings
Attachment C
CITY OF
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY HALL
10300 TORRE AVENUE • CUPERTINO, CA 95014-3255
TELEPHONE: (408) 777-3354 • FAX: (408) 777-3333
CUPERTINO CUPERTINO.ORG
SUSTAINABILITY COMMISSION STAFF REPORT
Meeting: October 17, 2024
Subject
Capital Improvement Program Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation project
Recommended Action
Recommend that City Council approve the Capital Improvement Program Photovoltaic
Systems Design and Installation project's conceptual design for five City facilities:
Cupertino Library, Community Hall, Cupertino Sports Center, Blackberry Farm, and
Quinlan Community Center.
Executive Summary
This report provides scope and fiscal information on each proposed site of the
Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation(PV) Capital Improvement Program (CIP)
project.
Background Information
The PV project was approved by the City Council as part of the Fiscal Year (FY)24-25
annual budget. The PV project description included in the budget adoption and meeting
details is attached (Attachment A).
The Net Energy Metering (NEM)program is administered by the California Public
Utilities Commission and provides credits to a building's utility bill for producing
excess on-site clean energy over a 20-year period. In 2023 PG&E announced a rate
decrease for electricity generated by photovoltaic (PV) systems (NEM 3)but provided a
window to allow grandfathering the more economically attractive NEM 2.0 rates if
interconnection applications were successfully submitted and corresponding systems
operational by 2026.
Reasons for Recommendation
NEM 2.0 Interconnection Applications were successfully submitted to PG&E for five
Cupertino facilities:Blackberry Farm Recreation and Pool facility, Community Hall,
Cupertino Library, Quinlan Community Center, and Cupertino Sports Center. This
Project aims to design and build PV systems at all five locations.
NEM 2.0 projects must be completed by April 15,2026 to receive the incentive.
Otherwise, the NEM 3.0 program, that offers reduced incentives/savings,would need to
be pursued. NEM 2.0 provides 75-80% greater compensation than NEM 3 rates for
electricity that is fed back into the electrical system. The savings in utility costs are
projected to be$500,000 annually, and$26.5 million over a 30yr lifespan. For more
detail, please see attachment B.
The City CIP staff is compiling a Conceptual Design Report that includes technical and
cost analysis data for each site. The following narratives from that report depict the
proposed layouts and projected cost savings at each site.
Cupertino Library
A number of options were considered for this site. The Library roof locations have an
advantageous size,but only one of the large roofs is well-oriented to the west or south.
Standing seam rooftops (supporting the two largest rooftop arrays) are ideal for
supporting solar, as racking can be clamped to the standing seams as opposed to
penetrating the roof surface.Long trenching/boring routes will be required to
consolidate generation at point of interconnection. While the proposed carport locations
took the trees into consideration, some smaller trees will need to be removed or
significantly trimmed to support the installation.
The electrical bill at the Library would be reduced from-$325K annually to-$120K
annually, with projected lifecycle savings of$11.7 million. The City's costs for design
and construction of$2.6 million could be recouped in just approximately 11 years.
The complication for the Library site is that the tenant, the Santa Clara County Library
District(SCCLD), pays the electrical bill. The fiscal benefit of the cost savings from the
photovoltaic installation would go to the SCCLD for the next twenty years. The payback
period for the project would be extended accordingly.
Aye
* O
AWL
—
,Y _ ` k.
G+— r
rt 2 ik
fi
,, ,f■
• � d
Design Library!Civic Center rr
Dc Nameplate 422.8 kW
AC Nameplate 403.0 kW(1.05 DC1AC}
Library Meter#1932850108
Last 12 months kWh usage 1,048,978 Construction Cost- PV only $3,801,000
Last 12 months cost of electrical $322,517 Construction Cost- EV only $300,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.31 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $4,101,000
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback(IRA)funding (40%,
621477 PV only) $1,520,400
PV systems annual savings* $202,501 City Funding $2,580,600
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
$120,016 cash flow) 10.65
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $11,701,727 ROI 453%
Blackberry Farm Recreation and Pool facility
A number of options were considered for this site. The building roof locations are too
small for a simple installation, and the solar orientation is not ideal. The proposed layout
is a single continuous system that requires fewer trenching/boring paths to the electrical
point of interconnection. The installation is far enough from trees that tree trimming will
not be needed to ensure solar access, and existing netting system will protect array from
golf balls. With system shading parking stalls, proportional shade coverage will need to
be provided on ADA parking stalls. The State and Cupertino green energy code for EV
parking requirements are under review and may be substantial.
The electrical bill at Blackberry Farm would be reduced from costing-$33K annually to
generating a revenue of almost$6K annually(because the PV system would generate
slightly more than the demand, and thus selling power back to PG&E). The lifecycle
savings are projected to be$1.6 million. The City's costs for design and construction of
$675K could be recouped in approximately 14 years.
rr
yy k
Y,
f'
Design Blackberry Farm carport r
DC Nameplate 73.1 kW
AC Nameplate 60.0 kW(1.22 DQAQ
Meter#11431
Last 12 months kWh usage 110,428 Construction Cost- PV only $955,500
Last 12 months cost of electrical $32,539 Construction Cost- EV only $100,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.29 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $1,055,500
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback(IRA)funding(40%,
110948 PV only) $382,200
PV systems annual savings* $38,253 City Funding $673,300
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
-$5,714 cash flow) 13.99
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $1,587,032 ROI 236%
Quinlan Community Center
A number of options were considered for this site. Preserving significant trees and
working within the aesthetics of the park were high priorities. This layout provides
maximal shaded parking and significantly shaded picnic area. Utilizes existing roof
areas, mitigating overall costs of the system. Northern carport will require some tree
trimming(overall tree health will not be compromised,however) to maintain solar
access and may require shade be provided for some existing ADA stalls. The picnic area
structure will be designed to respond architecturally to the layout of the picnic area
(rather than one large single shed roof as shown in the illustration).
The electrical bill at Quinlan would be reduced from costing-$122K annually to
generating a revenue of almost$33K annually(because the PV system would generate
slightly more than the demand, and thus selling power back to PG&E). The lifecycle
savings are projected to be$7.4 million. The City's costs for design and construction of
$1.6 million could be recouped in approximately 9 years.
Aft—
r F F '
14
t
r
Design Quinlan Community Center
DC Nameplate 311.5 kW .�s C-'
• 1
.Nameplate 273.n kW(1.14 DC/AC)
Quinlan Center Meter#0116367009- 116367840
Last 12 months kWh usage 383,109 Construction Cost- PV only $2,341,500
Last 12 months cost of electrical $121,336 Construction Cost- EV only $150,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.32 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $2,491,500
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback (IRA) funding (40%,
453795 PV only) $936,600
PV systems annual savings* $154,217 City Funding $1,554,900
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
-$32,881 cash flow) 8.85
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $7,398,086 R01 476%
Cupertino Sports Center
This system is well-aligned to the west and south-facing solar access. The northern array
is split around north-south site access path to allow for any traffic which could interfere
with the carport array. The tree in the corner between the two arrays would ideally be
slightly trimmed to ensure maximum solar access, and trees under the northern arrays
would need to be removed.
The electrical bill at the Sports Center would be reduced from -$108K annually to -$15K
annually, with projected lifecycle savings of$4.5 million. The City's costs for design and
construction of$1.3 million could be recouped in approximately 11 years.
�, :�- ;. - •�` -tom --tom
ILI
�. 51
a.
C; "`1
+I
Design Spons Center Carports
PC Nameplate 214 0 kW
AC Nameplate 172.0kW(1,24DVAC1
Sports Center Meter#0116367009- 116971849
Last 12 months kWh usage 329,369 Construction Cost- PV only $1,812,300
Last 12 months cost of electrical $108,143 Construction Cost- EV only $150,000
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.33 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $1,962,300
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback (IRA)funding (40%,
322104 PV only) $724,920
PV systems annual savings* $93,047 City Funding $1,237,380
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
$15,096 cash flow) 11.06
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $4,511,620 ROI 365%
Community Hall
This is an ideally oriented system with rooftop racking. Roof penetrations will not be
required, as the system will be able to clamp to the existing standing seam roof profile.
The electrical bill at Community Hall would be reduced from-$40K annually to-$10K
annually, with projected lifecycle savings of$1.3 million. The City's costs for design and
construction of$1.3 million could be recouped in approximately 7 years.
1�
Design Community Hall Rooftop 71
DC Nameplate 49.3 kW
AC Nameplate 5M kW(0.99 DC/AQ m
Community Hall Aeter#0116367009 - 116367449
Last 12 months kWh usage 114,600 Construction Cost- PV only $376,950
Last 12 months cost of electrical $39,810 Construction Cost- EV only $0
Cost per kWh (ave.) $0.35 Construction Cost-Total (PV+EV) $376,950
PV systems kWH generation Direct Payback (IRA)funding (40%,
66784 PV only) $150,780
PV systems annual savings* $29,441 City Funding $226,170
PV systems annual electrical bill** Payback period (years, discounted
$10,369 cash flow) 7.13
PV systems lifecycle savings*** $1,336,267 ROI 591%
The next steps for the project, pending Council's approval of the design-build project
delivery method, are:
1. Review of the photovoltaic systems for the five City facilities with Parks and
Recreation Commission (11/07/24), and the Community (10/29/24).
2. City Council meeting in December 2024 for approval of the design intent for each
facility.
Sustainability Impact
Adding solar generation reduces demand on the electrical grid and provides a
foundation to support future electrification of these facilities, which would be achieved
by transitioning to electric appliances. Electrification of existing buildings is a goal under
Measure BE-3 in the City's Climate Action Plan 2.0.
Fiscal Impact
The Photovoltaic Systems Design and Installation(budget unit 420-99-274)was
approved as part of the FY 2024-25 Budget at$6,300,000. There are no recommended
changes to the budget.
California Environmental Quality Act
The Project is Categorically Exempt as Class 1, Existing Facilities Under the California
Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) Guidelines Section 15301 and on a Separate and
Independent Basis is Exempt as Class 3, Construction of Small Structures,Under CEQA
Guidelines Section 15301.
Prepared by: Susan Michael, Capital Improvement Program Manager
Reviewed by: Chad Mosley, Director of Public Works
Attachments:
A—FY 24-25 CIP Project Narratives Excerpt
B -Redlined Staff Report with Changes
C-Clean Staff Report with Changes
D—PV Project Cost Savings
ATTACHMENT D
PHOTOVOLTAIC PROJECT COST/SAVINGS 17-Oct-24
*Annual savings includes 5%utility escalation,Year 1 ***Lifecycle Savings(30yrs)includes:5%utility escalation,0.4%module degradation,30 years,NEM3 Included
**The costs(8)are offset by the kWh savings(E),resulting in lowered electrical bill(F) *-Discounted cashflow methodology includes:5%utility escalation,0.4%module degradation,30 years,NEK
A R c n F F G H I I i< L M
Facility kWh kWh Cost cost per PV systems PV systems PV systems PV systems Constrn Constrn Constrn.Cast IRAfunding City Funding Payback
kWh kWH annual annual Lifecycle Cost:PV Cost:EVCS (PV+EV) (40%ofPV Period
(ave.) generation savings* electrical savings*** only only only) (years)
bill** ****
formula A/B 8-E H+l H*40% J-K
Library(1932850108) 1,048,978 $322,517 $0.31 621,477 $202,501 $120,016 $11,701,727 $3,801,000 $300,000 $4,101,000 $1,520,400 $2,580,600 10.65
BBF(1143 110 15284) ,428 $32,539 $0.29 110,948 $38,253 $5,714 $1,587,032 $955,500 $100,000 $1,055,500 $382,2001 $673,300 13.99
Quinlan Community Center
(0116367009-116367840) 383,109 $121,336 $0.32 453,795 $154,217 -$32,881 $7,398,086 $2,341,500 $150,000 $2,491,500 $936,600 $1,554,900 8.85
Sports Center(0116367009
116971849) 329,369 $108,143 $0.33 322,104 $93,047 $15,096 $4,511,620 $1,812,300 $150,000 $1,962,300 $724,920 $1,237,380 11.06
Community H
(0116367009 114,600 $39,810 $0.35 66,784 $29,441 $10,369 $1,336,267 $376,950 $0 $376,950 $150,780 $226,170 7.13
$624,345 $517,459 $106,886 $26,534,7321 $9,287,250 $700,000 $9,987,250 $3,714,900 $6,272,350 10.28
decreased by: 517,459 with 20%contingency $11,984,700
Four sites,WITHOUT BBF
Library(1932850108) 1,048,978 $322,517 $0.31 621,477 $202,501 $120,016 $11,701,727 $3,801,000 $300,000 $4,101,000 $1,520,400 $2,580,600 10.65
Quinlan Community Center
(0116367009-116367840) 383,109 $121,336 $0.32 453,795 $154,217 -$32,881 $7,398,086 $2,341,500 $150,000 $2,491,500 $936,600 $1,554,900 8.85
Sports Center(0116367009
116971849) 329,369 $108,143 $0.33 322,104 $93,047 $15,096 $4,511,620 $1,812,300 $150,000 $1,962,300 $724,920 $1,237,380 11.06
Community Hall
(0116367009-1163 114.600 $39,810 $0.35 66,784 $29,441 $10,369 $1,336,267 $376,950 $0 $376,950 $150,780 $226,170 7.13
$591,805 $479,206 $112,599 $24,947,700 $8,331,750 $600,000 $8,931,750 $3,332,700 $5,599,050 9.98
decreased by: 479,206 with 20%contingency $10,718,100
Three sites,WITHOUT BBF and Library
Quinlan Community Center
(0116367009-116367840) 383,109 $121,336 $0.32 453,795 $154,217 -$32,881 $7,398,086 $2,341,500 $150,000 $2,491,500 $936,600 $1,554,900 8.85
Sports Center(0116367009
116971849) 329,369 $108,143 $0.33 322,104 $93,047 $15,096 $4,511,620 $1,812,300 $150,000 $1,962,300 $724,920 $1,237,380 11.06
Community Hal
(0116367009-116367449) 114,600 $39,810 $0.35 66,7841 $29,441 $10,369 $1,336,267 $376,950F $0 $376,9501 $150,780 $226,170 7.13
$269,289 $276,705 -$7,416 $13,245,973 $4,530,750 $300,000 $4,830,7501 $1,812,300 $3,018,450 9.46
decreased by: 276,705 with 20%contingency $5,796,900
Four sites,WITHOUT LIBRARY
BBF(114315284) 110,428 $32,539 $0.29 110,948 $38,253 -$5,714 $1,587,032 $955,500 $100,000 $1,055,500 $382,200 $673,300 13.99
Quinlan Community Center
(0116367009-116367840) 383,109 $121,336 $0.32 453,795 $154,217 -$32,881 $7,398,086 $2,341,500 $150,000 $2,491,500 $936,600 $1,554,900 8.85
Sports Center(0116367009-
116971849) 329,369 $108,143 $0.33 322,104 $93,047 $15,096 $4,511,620 $1,812,300 $150,000 $1,962,300 $724,920 $1,237,380 11.06
Community Hall
(0116367009-116367449) 1 114,600 $39,810 $0.35 66,784 $29,441 $10,369 $1,336,267 $376,950 $0 $376,950 $150,780 $226,170 7.13
$301,828 $314,958 -$13,130 $14,833,005 $5,486,250 $400,000 $5,886,250 $2,194,500 $3,691,750 10.28
decreased by: 314,958 with 20%contingency $7,063,500