Loading...
ACC Agenda Packet 09-25-23CITY OF CUPERTINO ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION AGENDA 10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall, Conference Room C Monday, September 25, 2023 6:30 PM CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Subject: Meeting Minutes for the August 21, 2023 Arts and Culture Commission Special Meeting Recommended Action: Review and approve the minutes for the August 21, 2023 Arts and Culture Commission special meeting. A - Draft Minutes POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 2.Subject: Consider a public art installation for Jollyman Park Recommended Action: Receive a presentation on the proposed public art for the All-Inclusive Playground Project at Jollyman Park and approve the public art . Staff Report A- Draft Resolution B- Scientific Studio Resume C- UAP Resume D- Artwork Page 1 1 Arts and Culture Commission Agenda September 25, 2023 STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE AT UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS FUTURE AGENDA SETTING ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, during normal business hours. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. Do not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will be made publicly available on the City website. Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment . Page 2 2 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 23-12561 Agenda Date: 9/25/2023 Agenda #: 1. Subject:Meeting Minutes for the August 21, 2023 Arts and Culture Commission Special Meeting Review and approve the minutes for the August 21, 2023 Arts and Culture Commission special meeting. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 9/19/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™3 DRAFT MINUTES ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION Monday, August 21, 2023 6:00 p.m. ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING CALL TO ORDER At 6:00 p.m., Chair Maa called the special meeting to order at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Conference Room C. ROLL CALL Commissioners Present: Carol Maa, David Wang, Kiran Rohra Commissioners Absent: Rani Agrawal, Dana Ford Staff Present: Gian Martire, Jessica Javier Presenters: None APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Subject: Meeting Minutes for the May 22, 2023 Arts and Culture Commission Meeting Recommended Action: Review and approve the minutes for the May 22, 2023 Arts and Culture Commission meeting. Commissioner Rohra motioned to approve the May 22, 2023 Arts and Culture Commission meeting minutes as submitted. Vice Chair Wang seconded. Motion carried with 3 yes and 2 absent. POSTPONEMENTS None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None OLD BUSINESS None NEW BUSINESS 2. Subject: 2023 Artist Award Program and Theme for Young Artist Awards Recommended Action: Receive a presentation on the 2023 Artist Award program and finalize theme for the Young Artist Awards. 4 Gian Martire, Senior Planner, introduced Jessica Javier, Administrative Assistant, Parks and Recreation to present on the item. Administrative Assistant Javier provided an overview including background information, artist award categories, art types, application requirements, a timeline, and next steps. Commissioners asked clarifying questions. Commissioner Rohra requested clarification on how artwork is submitted. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified by showing the online tester application. She stated that the first portfolio upload is mandatory and the other nine are optional. Commissioner Rohra asked a follow-up concerning how audio-visual submissions would be handled. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that IT recommended a link be provided by the applicant. Vice Chair Wang requested clarification on whether past winners are allowed to apply again. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that they could. Vice Chair Wang requested clarification if past winners could be leveraged to help promote this in the community. Administrative Assistant Javier stated that past applicants’ emails were available and would inquire with the communications division if it was possible to include those email addresses in the e-notifications that will be sent. Chair Maa requested clarification as to where performance artwork had been considered for display. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that artwork is displayed at the library but would have to inquire as to how possible non-visual arts would be displayed. Chair Maa suggested an event to showcase winners that were non-visual arts if the situation arose. Chair Maa requested clarification if local businesses with available space might be utilized. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that showcasing would probably be kept within city facilities. She stated that Vice Chair Wang had inquired via email about the possibility of an Art Showcase Exhibition reception sometime before the awards were presented and that staff was looking into it. Chair Maa inquired if Quinlan might be a possible location for the art display. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that it had been considered, but the library historically has more foot traffic and is considered a better location. Chair Maa clarified that Quinlan might be a location for the possible Art Showcase Exhibition reception. Chair Maa expressed concerns that artwork be about the chosen theme and created specifically for the competition. She observed that in the previous year the theme was vague and felt some of the artwork was not created specifically with the competition in mind. Chair Maa observed that since the name had been changed to Arts and Culture Commission, she felt that it was their responsibility to broaden the contestants and the City of Cupertino’s idea of what Art and Culture is. All commissioners agreed. Commissioner Rohra observed the need to incorporate the culture aspect into all future considerations. 5 Chair Maa requested clarification as to why up to ten pieces are allowed in the portfolio. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that the ten was only for the Distinguished and Emerging Artist Award. She stated that this allows an artist to showcase their work and present a broad range of styles, techniques, and media. The Young Artist Award only allows one submission. Chair Maa suggested the wording be changed to say “can include up to” instead of “must include up to” on the application to avoid confusion. Chair Maa inquired if the number ten was up for discussion. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that it was historically ten and recommended it remain so for another year due to all the new commissioners. She stated that the subject could be revisited next year should the commissioners request it. Vice Chair Wang requested clarification as to who the commissioners should be contacting regarding public outreach. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that staff would send e- notifications to all subscribers of the commission and Parks and Recreation. She stated that the commissioners should focus on personal connections and art studios. She emphasized that applicants must be a resident or attend a school that is physically located in Cupertino. The commissioners made suggestions as to possible advertising opportunities. Chair Maa opened the discussion for the 2023 Young Artist Award theme. Vice Chair Wang stated that a theme involving Cupertino history would be worth exploring. He suggested another theme might involve the artist’s identity. Vice Chair Wang expressed interest in knowing who an artist is and what they value coming through in their art. Chair Maa suggested a theme concerning the architectural heritage of Cupertino. She stated that the theme might involve mid-century modernism and the Eichlers. Senior Planner Martire stated that there are historical landmarks called out in the City General Plan. Chair Maa suggested that a theme of architectural legacy and culture might inspire research on the subject. Commissioner Rohra reemphasized the need for the theme to involve the power and strength of diversity, unity, and uniqueness of Cupertino culture. Vice Chair Wang expressed concern that restricting the theme to architecture may cause a limited scope of submissions. Commissioner Rohra stated that the use of the word heritage could have a broader meaning than just history. Chair Maa suggested that it needed to be narrowed and more focused to allow more meaningful, emotional resonance. Chair Maa requested clarification if the final language of the theme needed to be settled at this meeting. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that it did. She further emphasized that the theme was for the Young Artists and the age range was from six years old to high school students. Chair Maa stated that she thought the high school students should be challenged. 6 Commissioner Rohra suggested that the commissioners think about Vice Chair Wang’s suggestion of personal identity and how that might be phrased. Vice Chair suggested that the theme might involve heroes and role models to emphasize the artist’s identity and values. Chair Maa suggested Artist’s Identity: A Journey of Self Discovery. Administrative Assistant Javier read back the suggestions for discussion: - Architectural Heritage of Cupertino - Cupertino Heritage and Your Idea of Home - Journey of and Artist’s Identity - Artist’s Identity: A Journey of Self Discovery Vice Chair Wang suggested adding Your Hero or Role Model. Commissioner Rohra suggested adding The Strength of Diversity. Senior Planner Martire requested clarification if just the subject theme was presented to the applicants or if any description with examples accompanied it. Administrative Assistant Javier clarified that the theme was just presented. Interpretation was left up to the artist. She stated that a descriptor could be added if the commission felt strongly about it. Commissioner Rohra stated that Cupertino Heritage and Your Idea of Home seemed fine. Chair Maa suggested Our Architectural Heritage and Your Idea of Home. Commissioner Rohra expressed her concern that the word architecture was limiting the scope of submittals. Chair Maa agreed and stated that was the intention. She suggested that it was a subject that had not been addressed before. Vice Chair Wang expressed concern that the youngest artists would not be able to appreciate different architectural styles. Chair Maa stated the challenge was to get the applicants to think more about the City of Cupertino. Chair Maa stated she liked the identity theme but wondered how it tied directly into Cupertino. Vice Chair Wang stated that it was more about the artist and how they see themselves. He suggested that Artist’s Identity: A Journey of Self Discovery was fine. Commissioner Rohra suggested a simplification of words to make it easier for younger artists to interpret. Chair Maa stated that she thought that they would interpret it fine, but a descriptor could be added if needed. Commissioner Rohra suggested how you see yourself as a descriptor. Administrative Assistant Javier suggested that the commissioners vote on which theme they were most interested in to narrow the choices. Commissioner Rohra voted for Cupertino Heritage and Your Idea of Home and The Strength of Diversity. Chair Maa and Vice Chair Wang voted for Artist’s Identity: A Journey of Self Discovery. Vice Chair Wang suggested some word smithing to make the theme less confusing. Senior Planner Martire suggested that the Artist’s Identity theme reference what influenced 7 their identity. Commissioner Rohra and Vice Chair Wang suggested simplification to Artist’s Identity: What Influences You. Chair Maa expressed concern that a simplified theme would generate a report and not an interpretation. Administrative Assistant Javier suggested that the commissioners vote on which version of the theme they preferred. Chair Maa voted for Artist’s Identity: A Journey of Self Discovery. Vice Chair Wang and Commissioner Rohra voted for Artist’s Identity: What Influences You. Commissioner Rohra motioned for the theme ”Artist’s Identity: What Influences You” for the 2023 Young Artist Award program. Vice Chair Wang seconded. Motion carried with 3 yes and 2 absent. Chair Maa closed the item. STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS Chair Maa reported on the July mayor’s commissioners meeting. She clarified that the meetings are an opportunity for the commissions to report to the mayor as well as the mayor to update the commissions about the mayor’s office. Commissioner Rohra reported on the June mayor’s meeting. She spoke of the positive response to her presentation on the proposed public art for the All-Inclusive Playground project at Jollyman Park. She stated that the mayor requested clarification on the cost. Commissioner Rohra clarified that staff was aware of the budget, has worked on similar projects, and was keeping the boundary condition in mind while bringing the proposals to the commission. Senior Planner Martire provided a Staff Update on the following: - The next regular commission meeting will be held on Monday, September 25 o The Westport Project (formerly The Oaks Project) is anticipated to be agendized. Two art pieces are slated for submission and are coming as a single application. - City Council is looking to have a study session on the art in-lieu fee policy. He was unsure if this was going to come to the Arts and Culture Commission prior to a study session in October. He is working with Public Works to interview other cities about their policies and standards for art. o Vice Chair Wang expressed his concern that City Council would make the decision about policies and standards without input from the Arts and Culture Commission. Senior Planner Martire explained that because the item is not a work program item, the normal procedures were not in place. Vice Chair Wang requested clarification on the potential workflow being 1.) City Council study session to help define the scope, 2.) Arts and Culture for review and recommendation, and 3.) back to City Council for final approval. Senior Planner Martire confirmed. o Chair Maa requested clarification if City Council had provided any guidance on possible outreach and questions. Senior Planner Martire clarified there was no such 8 guidance. He stated that they were looking at cities with similar demographics, geographically and size. o Chair Maa requested clarification on the proposed study session date. Senior Planner Martire confirmed the proposed date is October 10. o Vice Chair Wang stated that the study session was scheduled for October 10th. o Commissioner Rohra asked if this might be an agenda item for the September 25 commission meeting to get an idea of what will be presented at the study session. Senior Planner Martire stated he could probably present it as part of the Staff and Commission Reports. COMMISSIONER ATTENDANCE AT UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS Starting in September, the Mayor’s meetings will resume in-person at Quinlan. Commissioners to attend the upcoming Mayor’s meetings as follows: September 13 – Chair Maa October 11 – Vice Chair Wang November 8 – Commissioner Rohra FUTURE AGENDA SETTING Commissioner Rohra requested an update on the art in-lieu study session. Chair Maa seconded. Vice Chair Wang requested an update on the public art for the All-Inclusive Playground project at Jollyman Park. Commissioner Rohra seconded. Vice Chair Wang requested Art in Unexpected Places – specifically program overview, how it can be promoted, and what money is available. Chair Maa seconded. ADJOURNMENT Chair Maa adjourned the meeting at 7:45 p.m. to the September 25, 2023, meeting at 6:30 p.m. Respectfully Submitted by, Jon de Ridder, Administrative Assistant Community Development Department Minutes approved at the _____ regular meeting 9 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 23-12560 Agenda Date: 9/25/2023 Agenda #: 2. Subject:Consider a public art installation for Jollyman Park Receive a presentation on the proposed public art for the All-Inclusive Playground Project at Jollyman Park and approve the public art. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 9/19/2023Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™10 ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting Date: September 25, 2023 Subject Consider a public art installation for Jollyman Park Recommended Action Receive a presentation on the proposed public art for the All-Inclusive Playground Project at Jollyman Park and approve the public art. Discussion On November 22, 2021, the Arts and Culture Commissioners approved the in-lieu payment for art at the “Public Storage” development site. On May 2, City Council approved appropriation of the art in-lieu funds for the All-Inclusive Playground (AIPG) at Jollyman Park. On May 22, staff presented the public art concepts, and the Arts and Culture Commissioners provided feedback. The feedback was considered by staff and project consultants revised the proposal accordingly. The Artists Scientific Art Studio, an innovative design studio located in the Bay Area was selected to design the art piece. The studio designs interactive exhibits, play features and artistic sculptures in the Bay Area and beyond. Urban Arts Project (UAP) was selected to implement the design concept and fabricate the art piece. UAP is an artist collective with a strong track record of worldwide creative and quality art installations. Location Jollyman Park is an easily accessed City-owned site. The proposed interactive artwork, at the top of the Slide Mountain feature, will be visible to park visitors, residents, and pedestrians. Design The project team proposes one outdoor public art installation at the Jollyman AIPG to incorporate interactive play components that further elevate the all-inclusive nature of the Jollyman Park. The interactive art piece is a rotating color- and shadow-casting 11 kaleidoscope that will be installed at the top of the Slide Mountain feature. This art piece capitalizes on the theme of “nature exploration” that drives the play area's overall design and adds an additional layer of light and color sensations. It creates a visual draw to the play area from the surroundings, adding layers of sensory exploration and wonderment. Its movement can be manipulated and operated by individuals and/or groups. As it rotates, the art piece casts moving shadows and changes colors, creating shade and a rich, visually textured experience. The art piece, with its interactive components, provides visual stimulation, detail, and joy to Jollyman Park, inviting residents and the community alike. Environmental Review This project is categorically exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requirements per Section 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land). Next Steps The Art and Culture Commission's decision is final, Jollyman AIPG public art will be considered approved from this hearing date. Final design, fabrication, delivery, and installation will commence upon approval of the selected public art piece. _____________________________________ Prepared by: Evelyn Moran, Project Manager Reviewed and Approved for Submission by: Susan Michael, Capital Improvement Programs Manager Attachments: A - Draft Resolution B - Scientific Art Studio Resume C – UAP Resume D - Artwork 12 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION OF THE ARTS AND CULTURE COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING THE PROPOSED ART INSTALLATION AT THE JOLLYMAN PARK ALL-INCLUSIVE PLAYGROUND SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: CIP-2019-15 Applicant: City of Cupertino Location: 1000 S. Stelling Rd. (APN: 359-25-049, -048, -024, -002) SECTION II: FINDINGS WHEREAS, on November 22, 2021, the Arts and Culture Commission approved the in- lieu payment for art at the “Public Storage” development site; and WHEREAS, on May 2, 2023, City Council approved appropriation of the art in-lieu funds for the Jollyman All-Inclusive Playground (AIPG); and WHEREAS, on May 22, 2023, the Arts and Culture Commissioners provided feedback to City Staff for proposed artwork at the Jollyman All-Inclusive Playground (AIPG); and WHEREAS, artwork in public developments is required to be reviewed by the Arts and Culture Commission per Cupertino Municipal Code 2.80, subject to the Design Criteria as mandated in Cupertino Municipal Code 19.148; and WHEREAS, the Arts and Culture Commission has held at least one public meeting with regard to the application; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”), together with the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) (hereinafter, "CEQA Guidelines"), the City staff has independently studied the proposed Project and has determined that the Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the categorical exemption in CEQA Guidelines section Section 15304 (Minor Alterations to Land); and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and 13 Resolution No. CIP-2019-015 July 24, 2023 Page 2 WHEREAS, pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code Section 19.148.060 Design Criteria, the Arts and Culture Commission finds as follows with regard to this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of the maps, facts, exhibits, testimony, staff’s report and presentation, and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for an public artwork, Application no. CIP-2019-15 for Public Artwork is hereby approved and that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the Public Meeting record concerning Application no. CIP-2019- 15 as set forth in the Minutes of the Arts and Culture Commission Meeting of July 24, 2023 and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 25th day of September 2023 at a noticed Public Meeting of the Arts and Culture Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, by the following vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Gian Paolo Martire Carol Maa Senior Planner Chair 14 Resume Ron Holthuysen EXPERIENCE PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE ACADEMIC Scientific Art Studio 03/1980 – Present CEO/Creative Director Richmond, CA Founded the 2-person art & design company in 1980 in the Netherlands and developed it into a ten-person operation. Principal design projects included zoo and museum exhibits. Established Scientific Art Studio in the USA in Berkeley in 1994 as the principal designer, artist, and manager and has completed award winning advertising, educational, entertainment, and interactive multimedia design projects. Clients include: Disney (California Adventure Park), The San Francisco Giants (Giant Baseball Mitt), National Museum of Natural Sciences Taiwan, Tippett Studio (Robocop, Dragonheart, Starship Troopers, and more), The Rolling Stones (Bridges to Babylon Tour), the Olympic Games (GM Pavilion, Atlanta 1996), Gerard Howland (Experience Music Project, Seattle), Bay Area Discovery Museum (the Tot Lot & Lookout Cove), Atlantis Resorts (Dubai & Bahamas), the San Francisco Zoo, Mark Dion (The Arcturus Adventure), Mark Benioff (Presidio Playground), Podell (Architectural Facades in Downtown SF), Oakland Zoo (California Wild Play Environment), Santana Row San Jose (Public Art Installations), Monterey Bay Aquarium (Jellyfish Sculptures), Oakland Museum (Native California Exhibit), ACE Architects (Children’s Fairyland, Oakland), East Bay Regional Parks (Topo Maps) Lagere Landbouw School 08/1978 – 1980 Teacher of Biology, Chemistry and Animal Husbandry Montfoort, The Netherlands Explored working with children with learning and behavioral problems. Used outdoor exploration and experimentation. Natuurmuseum Drouwenenzand 1978 – 1980 Taxidermist Borgerweg Drouwen, The Netherlands Commercial and scientific preparation of specimens. Development of taxidermy techniques and processes. Research into prehistoric flintknapping techniques. Collaboration with scientists of a range of disciplines on the research and creation of prehistoric dioramas, natural history exhibits, recreations/reconstructions of prehistoric animals, plant and human lifeforms meant to spark discussion and enlightenment among science students. Examples include: Lecturer at UAS Sitka Alaska Scientific Art in the recreation of a baby Killer Whale model for Sitka Visitor Center. 15 BOARD MEMBERSHIPS AWARDS EDUCATION Dutch Taxidermy Association, European Taxidermy Association Judge WASA Knäckebröd commercial Elephant ad Titanic The Ride Scenic Design Santa Rosa Children’s museum Rotary Play Garden Hogere Landbouw School Dronten Lecturer, Agriculture and Teacher Degrees L1/L4 16 About UAP UAP is recognized world-round as a leader in public art and architectural design solutions. For more than 25 years, we have collaborated with emerging and established artists, architects, developers and designers to deliver creative outcomes for the public realm. UAP is engaged in all aspects of the delivery process from commissioning and curatorial services, through concept generation and design development, right into fabrication and installation. UAP works across the globe with key studios and workshops in New York, Brisbane, and Shanghai. NEW YORK 33 Bond St New York, NY 10012 +1 845 567 9464 newyork@uapcompany.com AECOM Aedas AMP Anthony John Group Architectus Australian Federal Government AVIC Real Estate Benoy Brisbane Airport Corporation Brisbane City Council Brookfield Multiplex Buchan Architects Bureau Proberts Callison LLC CapitaLand China Resources Land CITIC Group City of Sydney Crown Casino Culver City, USA DAMAC Properties, UAE DBI International DCM Architects Design Group Deutsche Bank Earthasia EDAW Egyptian Resort Company Excellence Group Exxon Mobil, USA Farglory Group Foster + Partners Four Seasons Hotels & Resorts Fox Studios Australia Gehry Partners Gemdale Group Gensler, USA Geyer Gold Coast City Council Greenland Holdings Greentown Group GSA Gubei Group Hang Lung Properties Hassell Hilton Hotels Hirsch Bedner Associates HOK, UAE Hyatt Hotels Inter Continental Hotels Jinghope KAUST, Saudi Arabia Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates Kunshan Urban Planning Leightons Lend Lease Longfor Property Group Marriot Miral Nakheel Properties, UAE National Capital Authority National Gallery of Australia Ningbo Bureau Ningbo Haicheng Investment & Development Co. Oger International, France PDT Architects Perth International Airport Pilbara City Council Place Design Group Qatar Foundation Queensland Government Ralph Applebaum R&F Properties RPS Landscape Architects Saudi Aramco, Saudi Arabia Saudi Oger, Saudi Arabia Shanghai Gubei Group Shanghai World Expo Bureau Shimao Group SHoP Architects, USA SJB Group Snøhetta South Bank Corporation Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide State Library of Queensland Stockland Studio 505 Sunland Development Group Swire Group Sydney International Airport Tishman International Group Vanke Group Wanda Group WATG, London Westfield, US Woods Bagot 2022 Shanghai Library East, The American Institute of Architects (AIA) Shanghai Chapter Honor Award on Healthcare/ Institutional/ Civic Category in collaboration with SHL Architects Black Star Pastry Shanghai Flagship Store and Linehouse, Archdaily Building of the Year/ Interiors of the Year 2023, in collaboration with artists Debbie Lawson and Naoko Ito Rider Levett Bucknall Award for Best Public Art Project, Lindy Lee, Vault of Heaven & Seeds of Cosmos at Sixty Martin Place, Sydney National Commendation for Urban Design Australia, Riverside Parkland South Bank Brisbane, in collaboration with Hassell and First Nations artist Elisa Jane Carmichael Australian Financial Review Higher Education and Research Awards, Design Robotics Team at UAP Interior Design Excellence Awards (IDEA), in collaboration with CARR and Wolfgang Buttress for artwork, Solar 2020 AILA National Award of Excellence for Civic Landscape, Lindy Lee, The Garden of Cloud and Stone at Chinatown, Sydney CODA Awards – Public Spaces, Florentijn Hofman, Selfie Panda CODA Awards – Public Spaces, Lucy Simpson, Bawuwan CODA Awards – Public Spaces, Paul Cocksedge Studio, Please Be Seated 2018 Iconic Awards—Winner in Innovative Architecture—Best of Best category for Wahat Al Karama. Collaboration with UAP, Idris Khan & bureau^proberts. World Architecture News Awards—Winner of Metal in Architecutre category for Wahat Al Karama. Collaboration with UAP, Idris Khan & bureau^proberts. 2017 American Architecture Prize | Cultural Architecture—Winner Idris Khan with bureau^proberts and UAP for Wahat al Karama (Oasis of Dignity) in Abu Dhabi. AIANY Design Awards Merit Award—Architect J. Mayer H. und Partner, Architekten for the XXX Times Square with Love project in New York, in collaboration with UAP. 2016 Architizer A+ Awards. Finalist in the 2016 Plus Categories | Architecture + Metal. UAP collaborated with Gehry Partners on the sculptural staircase for the UTS Dr Chau Chak Wing Building project. Queensland Landscape Architecture Awards Civic Landscape – QAILA Landscape Architecture Award (in collaboration with City of Gold Coast) Tourism — QAILA Landscape Architecture Award (in collaboration with RPS) Select AwardsSelect Clients 17 Selected Projects NOW, 2023 ARTIST: Shahzia Sikander PROJECT: Madison Square Park CLIENT: Madison Square Park Conservancy UAP collaborated with Madison Square Park Conservancy, Sean Kelly Gallery and Art Makers to create Sikander’s Now. Which is a nine-foot-tall sculpture which is placed atop the courthouse of the Appellate Division, First Department of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Gather, 2022 ARTIST: Ben Butler PROJECT: Fenton Art Strategy + Artwork CLIENT: Hines UAP collaborated with Ben to strategize how to build these three sculptures. Using 3D models made from physical maquettes, Ben’s vision was brought to life in Cor-Ten weathering steel, which expresses the forces of change in the natural world. Gather,’ by Ben Butler, was delivered as a result of a Public Art Strategy developed for Hines and Columbia Development by UAP. The Distance Within, 2021 ARTIST: Thomas J Price PROJECT: The Distance Within CLIENT: Studio Museum Harlem UAP’s design and workshop team worked closely with Price and Studio Museum to create a sculpture that would need little physical intervention by the artist. As part of the Price’s first solo US museum presentation titled Thomas J Price: Witness; The Studio Museum in Harlem commissioned Thomas J Price for a temporary public art installation The Distance Within (2021). This monumental artwork is Price’s nine-foot-tall bronze sculpture depicting a young Black man looking down at his cell phone. Eye of Infinity , 2022 ARTIST: Lindy Lee PROJECT: The Peak Tram Central Terminus CLIENT: The Peak Tramways Company / The Hong Kong and Shanghai Hotels UAP’s teams in China and Australia worked closely with Lindy Lee and her studio team based outside Byron Bay, Australia, and art consultants Art Partners- through all stages of creation. This monumental sculpture was cast in bronze using a sand-casting technique, and the varied and complex elements of the artwork were assembled, finished, and patinated, all in close coordination with the artist over a period of almost three years. Oracle, 2021 ARTIST: Sanford Biggers PROJECT: Chimera CLIENT: Sanford Biggers, Art Production Fund & Rockefeller Center From a collaborative design development phase, through production and into the final installation, UAP’s New York team was thrilled to closely work with Sanford and his studio. This monumental sculpture was cast in bronze using a sand-casting technique. The varied and complex elements of the artwork were assembled, finished, and patinated, all in close coordination with the artist. Living Word, 2022 ARTIST: Xu Bing PROJECT: Shanghai Library East CLIENT: Shanghai Library Xu Bing and his studio worked closely with UAP’s team in China to deliver Living Word for Shanghai Library East. The artwork comprises over 804 laser- cut acrylic ‘birds’ in different writing styles of “square word calligraphy” — a new form of writing created by the artist. It is designed to resemble Chinese square characters in English. These iconic figures soar up from the top left corner of the page, inviting readers to free their minds and explore the ideas of writing, Chinese calligraphy, and the interchange of various cultures. Ancestor, 2022 ARTIST: Bharti Kher PROJECT: Public Art Fund CLIENT: Public Art Fund Located at Doris C. Freedman Plaza at the southeast entrance of Central Park stands this 18-foot tall patinated bronze sculpture. From scanning and enlarging the original maquette, to fabricating, patina and hand painting this large sculpture, UAP was engaged throughout the design coordination and construction of Kher’s largest project. This project has been delivered in collaboration with Public Art Fund. Please Be Seated, 2020 ARTIST: Paul Cocksedge Studio CLIENT: Swire Properties UAP Shanghai worked closely with Paul Cocksedge Studio to explore fabrication methods and materiality suitable for a large-scale touring installation. Fabricated from 1,440 planks of sustainably sourced timber, this 15.2 metre-long installation features ‘waves’ of wood rising to form arches for people to walk through, and curves under to create space for people to sit, lie and relax. Speaking Willow, 2020 ARTIST: Rafael Lozano-Hemmer PROJECT: Planet Word Museum CLIENT: Antimodular Research Inc Fabricated and installed on site by UAP, the work required complex fabrication methods to hand craft the trunk and branches from stainless steel. The work was then animated by 3.6 miles of ethernet cable, fed through the branches and fitted with individual speakers and lighting elements. UAP was engaged from the design development stage of this project through fabrication and installation. Queen’s Wharf Public Art Strategy, 2016 - present CLIENT: Echo Entertainment + Destination Brisbane Consortium UAP STUDIO, as part of the Destination Brisbane Consortium (DBC) Design Team, developed Promise of the Sun: Spirit, Brilliance, Optimism, a site- specific Curatorial Vision created to direct the commissioning of artwork across the site’s vast public realm – the equivalent size of approximately 12 football fields once completed. 18 Jollyman Park All-Inclusive Playground Project Description The kaleidoscope art installation will tower above the play area like a beacon, centered at the top of the slide hill. Interactive handles on a central post will enable children to spin the colored lenses above to cast colorful refl ections and shadows below. Art Feature KALEIDOSCOPE 19