Loading...
PC 09-13-2022 Searchable PacketCITY OF CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA This will be a teleconference meeting with no physical location Tuesday, September 13, 2022 6:45 PM TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 In accordance with Government Code 54953(e), this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the following ways: 1) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Tuesday, September 13 to the Commission at planningcommission@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the Commission members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the meeting. 2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the Commission at planningcommission@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to the Chair’s discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that wish to share a document must email planningcommission@cupertino.org prior to speaking. 3) Teleconferencing Instructions Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public comments as follows: Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the public comment period for each agenda item. To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the meeting: Page 1 PC 09-13-2022 1 of 439 Planning Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 Online Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_bVk0ZkUMTf6pILwprL0WPg Phone Dial: (669) 900 6833 and enter Webinar ID: 978 9334 1482 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak) Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. Or an H.323/SIP room system: H.323: 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) Meeting ID: 978 9334 1482 SIP: 97893341482@zoomcrc.com After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Please read the following instructions carefully: 1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer. 2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation. 3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.” Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. 4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda topic. ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Subject: Approve the June 28 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes Recommended Action: Approve the June 28 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes Page 2 PC 09-13-2022 2 of 439 Planning Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 1 - Draft Minutes 2.Subject: Approve the July 5 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes Recommended Action: Approve the July 5 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes 1 - Draft Minutes 3.Subject: Approve the July 12 Planning Commission Minutes Recommended Action: Approve the July 12 Planning Commission Minutes 1 - Draft Minutes POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless there are separate discussions and/or actions requested by council, staff or a member of the public, it is requested that items under the Consent Calendar be acted on simultaneously. PUBLIC HEARINGS 4.Subject: Tentative Map to consider the subdivision of one 1.25 acre parcel into six parcels ranging between 7,526 square feet and 9,615 square feet, Two-Story Permits and Minor Residential Permits to consider the development of six single-family homes each with a second story balcony.(Application No.'s: TM-2021-006, R-2021-040, -041, -042, -043, -045, and RM-2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026); Applicant: Alok Damireddy; Location: 20860 McClellan Road; APN: 359-20-030) Recommended Action: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the draft resolutions (Attachments 1-3), recommending that the City Council: 1. Approve the Tentative Map (TM-2021-006); 2. Approve the Two-Story Permits (R-2021-040, -041, -042, -043, -045); and 3. Approve Minor Residential Permits (RM-2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026) Page 3 PC 09-13-2022 3 of 439 Planning Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 Staff Report 1 - Draft Resolution for TM-2021-006 2 - Draft Resolution for R-2021-040 to -045 3 - Draft Resolution for RM-2022-015 to -016, -022, etc. 4 - Infill Exemption Memorandum 5 - Public Comment and Email from Cherryland HOA 6 - Project Plans 5.Subject: Modification of an existing Use Permit (U-2005-04) to allow above ground crypts on a portion of the Gates of Heaven Cemetery. (Application No.: M-2022-002; Applicant: Heather Gloster (Gates of Heaven Cemetery); Location: 22557 Cristo Rey Drive; APN: 342-63-002) Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolution (Attachment 1) to: 1. Find that the proposed actions are exempt from CEQA; and 2. Approve the Use Permit Amendment (M-2022-002). Staff Report 1 - Draft Resolution for M-2022-002 2 - Plan Set 3 - Santa Clara County Use Permit 4 - Planning Commission Resolutions 6622 & 6623 OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS FUTURE AGENDA SETTING ADJOURNMENT If you challenge the action of the Planning Commission in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this agenda, or in written correspondence delivered to the City of Cupertino at, or prior to, the public hearing. In the event an action taken by the Planning Commission is deemed objectionable, the matter may be officially appealed to the City Council in writing within fourteen (14) days of the date of the Commission’s decision. Said appeal is filed with the City Clerk (Ordinance 632). In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate alternative format. Page 4 PC 09-13-2022 4 of 439 Planning Commission Agenda September 13, 2022 Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission after publication of the packet will be made available for public inspection in the Community Development Department located at City Hall, 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, during normal business hours; and in Planning packet archives linked from the agenda/minutes page on the Cupertino web site. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. Do not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will be made publicly available on the City website. Members of the public are entitled to address the Planning Commission concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the Planning Commission on any issue that is on this agenda, please complete a speaker request card located in front of the Commission, and deliver it to the City Staff prior to discussion of the item. When you are called, proceed to the podium and the Chair will recognize you. If you wish to address the Planning Commission on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so by during the public comment portion of the meeting following the same procedure described above. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes or less. For questions on any items in the agenda, or for documents related to any of the items on the agenda, contact the Planning Department at (408) 777 3308 or planning@cupertino.org. Page 5 PC 09-13-2022 5 of 439 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 22-10860 Agenda Date: 9/13/2022 Agenda #: 1. Subject: Approve the June 28 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes Approve the June 28 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 9/8/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ PC 09-13-2022 6 of 439         DRAFT MINUTES  CUPERTINO PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSIONS  Tuesday, June 28, 2022    SPECIAL JOINT MEETING    At 6:45 p.m. Planning Commission Chair Steven Scharf called the Special Joint Planning  Commission and Housing Commission meeting to order. This was a teleconference meeting  with no physical location.    ROLL CALL    Present: Planning Commission Chair Steven Scharf, Planning Commission Vice Chair Muni  Madhdhipatla, Planning Commissioners Sanjiv Kapil, R Wang; Housing Commission Chair Tessa  Parish, Housing Commission Vice Chair Govind Tatachari, Housing Commissioners Sue Bose  (6:49 p.m.), Connie Cunningham, Angan Das (7:06). Absent: Planning Commissioner Vikram  Saxena. All Commissioners teleconferenced for the meeting.    APPROVAL OF MINUTES    1. Subject: Approve the June 14 Planning Commission minutes   Recommended Action: Approve the June 14 Planning Commission minutes    Chair Scharf moved and Vice Chair Madhdhipatla seconded to approve the June 14  Planning Commission minutes. Ayes: Scharf, Madhdhipatla, Wang. Noes: None. Abstain:  Kapil. Absent: Saxena.    POSTPONEMENTS – None    ORAL COMMUNICATIONS     Jennifer Griffin spoke about the State Housing and Community Development (HCD) potentially  overriding Coastal Commission and housing regulations in Southern California.    Peggy Griffin thanked Commissions for having a joint meeting and encouraged more  collaborations between City legislative bodies to address important City activities.  PC 09-13-2022 7 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes        June 28, 2022     Lisa Warren spoke about the Commissions having a joint meeting to discuss Housing Element  Update.    WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ‐ None    CONSENT CALENDAR – None    PUBLIC HEARINGS    2. Subject: The fifth meeting on the Housing Element update focusing on the establishment  of a housing sites selection inventory. The previous four meetings were solely with the  Planning Commission.   Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission and Housing Commission receive  the report and presentation, provide input on the proposed housing sites inventory , and  make a recommendation stating which sites on the Sites Inventory Table (Attachment A)  be included on the housing sites inventory.    Senior Planner Luke Connolly introduced Ande Flower of EMC Planning Group who  gave a presentation on the Housing Element Update (HE) identifying potential housing  sites that will be used to promote Housing Development.     Per requirements of state law, Cupertino must identify land zoned to accommodate 4,588  housing units; of these, 3,563 units are included in pipeline projects approved for  building during this cycle. 357 units were identified in 8 Cupertino neighborhoods, and  1,487 units were identified in 7 Special Areas, for a total of 1,844 identified sites for  approval.     The discussion will primarily focus on Tier 1 sites since there are more than enough Tier  1 sites currently identified which need to be narrowed down to the number of units that  need to be accommodated. However, the Commissions and public were encouraged to  engage with the interactive mapping tool on the EngageCupertino.org webpage.    Further input from both the Planning and Housing Commissions is sought for  recommendation of potential sites for City Council consideration.     Written Communications for this item included emails received before the meeting and  sent to both Commissions, including an email from Cupertino For All which was read to  the Commissions.    Planning Commission Chair Scharf allowed public comment following the conclusion of  PC 09-13-2022 8 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes        June 28, 2022   Mr. Flower’s presentation and the following members of the public spoke:    Scott Connelly – commented on lack of height and maximum density on inventory tables  and questioned when breakdown of affordability of each HE site list will be made  available, as well as what types of housing units can be expected based on state  guidelines for housing density.    Jennifer Griffin – questioned HCD’s guidelines regarding upzoning and inclusion of  properties on the sites inventory in which the owners were notified.     Liana Crabtree – shared a slide regarding VTA’s proposed route map that may help  guide the Commission’s decisions on proposed HE sites.    Peggy Griffin – expressed discontent about inclusion of sites in the Stevens Creek  Boulevard west of the Post Office, and south of railroad tracks and commented on errors  in the HE presentation should be corrected before being brought to Council.     Lisa Warren – requested inclusion of height information in the sites inventory and asked  Commission to consider the number of units per acre when selecting sites.    Planning Commission Chair Scharf closed the public comment period.    Commissioners from each Commission asked questions and made comments which were  answered by Mr. Flower, David Masenten, also of EMC Planning Group, Planning  Manager Piu Ghosh, Senior Planner Luke Connolly, and Senior Assistant City Attorney  Michael Woo, and discussed feedback provided by both the Commission and members  of the public.       Commissioners and members of the public spoke multiple times during discussion and  review of each neighborhood area going east to west. Votes from the Commission are  listed following the discussion of each neighborhood.    Neighborhood Area 11: South Blaney (129 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – save retail and commercial sites.    Peggy Griffin, public comment – plan for mixed‐use, with wording to reflect “shall”, not  “should”, and realistic density bonus.    Scott Connelly, public comment – consideration of the west portion of Pacific Rim Plaza,  and sites where property owners are not inclined to be included in list.  PC 09-13-2022 9 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes        June 28, 2022     Rhoda Fry, public comment – increase walkability, and taxes from Density Bonuses.     Motion by Scharf and second by Madhdhipatla to keep 11b and 11c as is and change the  maximum density of 11a max to 20 units per acre.     Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Das, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: Kapil  Absent: Saxena  Motion passes 8‐0‐1‐1    Neighborhood Area 9: North Blaney (61 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – Pointe apartments are considered tier 2, concern of  displacement to add 50 additional units.    Peggy Griffin, public comment – concern of displacement related to site 9a and request  removal of site 9b from consideration.    Motion by Scharf and second by Madhdhipatla to keep recommended sites as is.    Ayes: PC – Kapil, Madhdhipatla Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Das, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: Wang  Abstain: None  Absent: Saxena, Das (unclear when Das left meeting)  Motion passes 8‐1‐0‐2     Neighborhood Area 6: Jollyman (44 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – concern of Church being listed in site list.       Peggy Griffin, public comment – concern of inclusion of pipeline site on list.      Motion by Wang to keep all sites, change site P8 to a tier 1 site, and  change 6c to as SB9  site.    Revised motion by Wang and second by Madhdhipatla to make P8, a tier 1 site, keeping  sites 6a and 6b as tier 1 sites, and designating 6c to an SB9 site and leave 6d for a separate  vote.    PC 09-13-2022 10 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes        June 28, 2022   Ayes: PC – Kapil, Wang, Madhdhipatla; HC – Bose, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: Scharf, Cunningham  Abstain: None  Absent: Saxena, Das  Motion passes 6‐2‐0‐2     Motion by Wang and second by xx to change 6d to a tier 1 site.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Parish  Noes: Kapil, Tatachari  Abstain: None  Absent: Saxena, Das  Motion passes 6‐2‐0‐2     Special Area 26: North Vallco Park (368 units)    Scott Connelly, public comment – concern that the 99 Ranch operators may not know  about the plans for this site.      Jennifer Griffin, public comment – concern of traffic congestion if existing 99 Ranch site  were to be rebuilt.    Peggy Griffin, public comment – keep retail sites as is.      Motion by Scharf and second by Wang to keep existing sites as tier 1 and remove APN  316‐45‐017 from site selection.    Ayes: PC – Kapil, Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Parish  Noes: Tatachari  Abstain:   Absent: Saxena, Das  Motion passes 7‐1‐0‐2     Special Area 24: Vallco Shopping District (257 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – remove site from consideration and concern of  transparency and potential traffic congestion.     Lisa Warren, public comment – concerns of potential housing types that will be built on  property.    PC 09-13-2022 11 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes        June 28, 2022   Peggy Griffin, public comment – consider Outback as potential location for affordable  housing and not consider the Simeon property.     Motion by Scharf and second by Wang to keep 24a as tier 1 site.     Ayes: PC – Wang, Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham  Noes: Madhdhipatla, Kapil, Parish, Tatachari,   Abstain: None  Absent: Saxena, Das  Motion failed 4‐4‐0‐2     Motion by Scharf and second by Wang to reconsider vote that occurred to keep 24a a tier  1 site and change maximum height from 80’ to 60’ with appropriate environmental  protections.    Ayes: PC – Kapil, Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Parish  Noes: Tatachari  Abstain: None  Absent: Saxena, Das  Motion passes 7‐1‐0‐2     ADJOURNMENT    At 11:59 p.m., Planning Commission Chair Scharf adjourned the meeting to continue discussion  of item to July 5th at 5:30 p.m.    _/s/Cyrah Caburian____________________  Cyrah Caburian, Administrative Assistant  PC 09-13-2022 12 of 439 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 22-11222 Agenda Date: 9/13/2022 Agenda #: 2. Subject: Approve the July 5 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes Approve the July 5 Planning Commission and Housing Commission Joint Special Meeting minutes CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 9/8/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ PC 09-13-2022 13 of 439         DRAFT MINUTES  CUPERTINO PLANNING AND HOUSING COMMISSIONS  Tuesday, July 5, 2022    SPECIAL JOINT MEETING – CONTINUED FROM JUNE 28, 2022    At 5:30 p.m. Planning Commission Chair Steven Scharf called the Special Joint Planning  Commission and Housing Commission meeting to order. This was a teleconference meeting  with no physical location.    ROLL CALL    Present: Planning Commission Chair Steven Scharf, Planning Commission Vice Chair Muni  Madhdhipatla, Planning Commissioner R Wang; Housing Commission Chair Tessa Parish,  Housing Commission Vice Chair Govind Tatachari, Housing Commissioners Sue Bose, Connie  Cunningham. Absent: Planning Commissioners Vikram Saxena, Sanjiv Kapil, Housing  Commissioner Das. All Commissioners teleconferenced for the meeting.    ORAL COMMUNICATIONS    Peggy Griffin thanked the group for discussion of site inventory.    Jennifer Griffin thanked the group for discussion of site inventory and expressed concern of state  precedents for the Housing Element cycle (HE).    Lisa Warren thanked the group for discussion of site inventory.     Scott Connelly expressed concerns of community participation for the meeting and site  inventories list.    PUBLIC HEARINGS – CONTINUED    The Planning and Housing Commissions continued the discussion on item 2 from the Tuesday,  June 28 Planning and Housing Commissions Special Joint Meeting agenda.    1. Subject: The fifth meeting on the Housing Element update focusing on the establishment  PC 09-13-2022 14 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC  of a housing sites selection inventory. The previous four meetings were solely with the  Planning Commission.   Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission and Housing Commission receive  the report and presentation, provide input on the proposed housing inventory sites, and  make a recommendation stating which sites on the Sites Inventory Table (Attachment A)  be included on the housing sites inventory.    The previous meeting began discussion on the South Blaney, North Blaney, Jollyman,  North Vallco Park, and Vallco Shopping District neighborhood areas. Tonight’s  discussion will continue with the remaining housing inventory sites, with  Commissioners and members of the public speaking multiple times during discussion  and review of each neighborhood area going east to west. Votes from the Commission  are listed following the discussion of each neighborhood area.    Special Area 18: Heart of the City – East (133 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – concern about different parcels on 18a site and traffic  congestions.      Lisa Warren, public comment – concern of foot height measurements and density.      Peggy Griffin, public comment – concern of foot height measurement and density.    Scott Connelly, public comment – expressed concern regarding the massing of new  development.     Jennifer Shearin, public comment – supported site and questioned whether discussion of  height limitations goes beyond scope of discussion.     Jennifer Griffin – does not support removing gas station, concern of density and traffic.    Peggy Griffin – does not support removing gas station.    Lisa Warren – does not support building on site.    Scott Connelly – question of what a 50 units per acre would look like on site and parking  options.     Motion by Scharf and second by Bose to convert north half of 18a and 18b to 50 units per  acre, but change south half of 18a and 18b to 25 units per acre, change 18c to 25 units per  acre, change 18d to 50 units per acre.   PC 09-13-2022 15 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das  Motion passes 7‐0‐0‐3    Special Area 16: Heart of the City – Central (0 units; for consideration of viable tier 2  units)     No discussion held as all considered sites are tier 2.    Special Area 15: Heart of the City – Crossroads (0 units; for consideration of viable tier 2  units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – request discussion on 18c and 18d.      Lisa Warren, public comment – suggest brief discussion on tier 2 sites.    Peggy Griffin, public comment – suggest leaving tier 2 sites alone and revisit for potential  additional units are needed.     Special Area 23: South De Anza (462 units)     Jennifer Griffin, public comment – does not support losing retail.      Peggy Griffin, public comment – does not support losing retail.     Scott Connelly, public comment – does not support losing retail.     Liana Crabtree, public comment – does not support losing retail, encouraged working  with VTA for increased transit.     Lisa Warren, public comment – does not support losing retail.      Motion by Scharf and second by Wang to keep change 23d to tier 1 and change 23f to tier  2.     Revised Motion by Scharf and second by Cunningham to change Summerwinds to tier 2  site, convert Yamagami’s to tier 1 site, keep remaining sites as tier 1, and split tier 1 site  50/50, with west side 30 units per acre, and east 50 units per acre with exception of P4.   PC 09-13-2022 16 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC    Ayes: PC – Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: Wang  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das  Motion passes 6‐1‐0‐3    Commissioner Bose left the meeting at 7:57.    The Commissions recessed from 7:57 to 8:02.    Special Area 20: Stelling Gateway (440 units)    Scott Connelly, public comment – concern whether all tier 1 sites have owner interest to  develop.     Jennifer Griffin, public comment – concern of potential traffic congestion in area.      Peggy Griffin, public comment – request to keep retail in area.    Lisa Warren, public comment – consider Kelly Moore location as potential site.     Motion by Scharf and second by Cunningham to keep sites as is.     Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4    Special Area 19: Homestead (27 units)       Jennifer Griffin, public comment – concern of proposed high‐density sites.     Peggy Griffin, public comment – question why both sites have different recommended  densities.     Scott Connelly, public comment – concern of high‐density site proximity to single‐family  homes.    Lisa Warren, public comment – in favor of high density at site.  PC 09-13-2022 17 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC    Motion by Parish and second by Cunningham to leave sites as is.     Ayes: PC – Scharf; HC – Bose, Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: Wang, Madhdhipatla  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 4‐2‐0‐4     Special Area 21: Monta Vista Village (8 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – question of existing lot sizes.     Lisa Warren, public comment – in favor of changing site to tier 2.    Peggy Griffin, public comment – in favor of changing site to tier 2 and increase density.    Motion by Cunningham and second by Scharf to removes sites 21a, 21b, and 21c from site  inventory list.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4    Special Area 13: Bubb Road (23 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – question of property to left of proposed site and access  issues.    Motion by Wang and second by Madhdhipatla to keep sites as is.    Substitute motion by Scharf and second by Cunningham to increase density units to 50.    Ayes: PC – Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: Wang, Madhdhipatla  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 4‐2‐0‐4    PC 09-13-2022 18 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC   Neighborhood Area 8: Monta Vista South (22 units)    Lisa Warren, public comment – in favor of proposed sites.    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – not in favor of keeping site as tier 1.     Peggy Griffin, public comment – in favor proposed sites.     Scott Connelly, public comment – not in favor of keeping site as tier 1 and concern fire  severity.    Motion by Madhdhipatla and second by Scharf to change 8b and 8c to 30 units per acre,  keep 8a and 8d as is.    Revised motion by Parish and second by Scharf to keep sites as is.    Ayes: PC – Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Parish  Noes: Wang, Madhdhipatla, Tatachari  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion failed 3‐3‐0‐4    Motion by Madhdhipatla and second by Wang to reconsider vote that occurred to keep  8a,8b, and 8d keep as it, and change 8c density from 5 units to 15 units per acre.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Tatachari, Parish  Noes: Cunningham  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 5‐1‐0‐4     Neighborhood Area 7: Monta Vista North (72 units)    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – not in favor of high density and fire risk.     Lisa Warren, public comment – in favor of sites.    Rhoda Fry, public comment – in favor of additional sites.    Barris Evulich, public comment – owner interest and expressed favor for townhomes on  sites.  PC 09-13-2022 19 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC    Motion by Scharf and second by Parish to change 7a density to 30 units per acre.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4     Neighborhood Area 4: Homestead Villa (12 units)    Lisa Warren, public comment – expressed hope that sites not on list be considered.    Scott Connelly, public comment – concern of attached townhome developments.    Jennifer Griffin, public comment – question of housing proposal on narrow lot and  concern about traffic and noise.    Motion by Wang and second by Scharf to change 4a density to 30 units per acre.    Substitute motion by Tatachari and second by Wang to change 4a density to 20 units per  acre.    Second substitute motion by Parish and second by Wang to change 4a density to 20 units  per acre and inclusion of explanation that range can be 15 to 20 units.     Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4    Motion by Scharf to reconsider vote that occurred to change 4a density to 30 to 25 units  per acre. Motion not adopted for vote.     The Commissions recessed from 10:05 to 10:10.      Neighborhood Area 3: Garden Gate (22 units)     Jennifer Griffin, public comment – concern of HE site not being built to recommended  density.  PC 09-13-2022 20 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC    Peggy Griffin, public comment – confirmation that 3a can move to the North Blaney  neighborhood, not Garden Gate, being a tier 2 site.    Lisa Warren, public comment – concern of community participation at meetings, and if  number of survey participants were Cupertino residents.    Motion by Wang and second by Scharf to keep sites as is.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4    Neighborhood Area 1: Creston‐Pharlap (31 units)     Jennifer Griffin, public comment – question of recommended units on property if owner  shows interest.    Lisa Warren, public comment – in favor of site.     Motion by Scharf and second by Wang to change 1c to 10 units per acre (R‐1.5), change 1b  to 10 units per acre, and keep 1e as is.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4    Motion by Scharf and second by Wang to keep 1d as is and reduce density to 5 units per  acre.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4    Final motion by Scharf and second by Parish that the Planning Commission and Housing  PC 09-13-2022 21 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC  Commission adopt all motions from both special meetings with modifications stating  which sites on the Sites Inventory Table be included on the housing sites inventory for  final adoption.    Ayes: PC – Wang, Madhdhipatla, Scharf; HC – Cunningham, Tatachari, Parish  Noes: None  Abstain: None  Absent: Kapil, Saxena, Das, Bose  Motion passes 6‐0‐0‐4    Recommended sites will be brought forth to the City Council for consideration,  discussion and final approval at the July 19 City Council meeting.    OLD BUSINESS – None    NEW BUSINESS – None    STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS    Housing Commissioner Cunningham thanked staff and consultants and expressed surprise of  exclusion of Hamptons site from inventory and question of why Apple sites near Bubb Road  were not included on sites inventory.    Housing Commissioner Tatachari expressed Apple’s participation in site selection.    Member of the public, Lisa Warren, thanked Housing Commissioner Cunningham for bringing  attention to Apple participating in inventory list.    Member of the public, Jennifer Griffin, expressed concern of soil contamination and that  housing cannot be built on such properties.    Housing Chair Parish requested for additional meeting with Planning Commission; because of  staffing constraints to finalize report for City Council, Commissioners were encouraged to speak  and comment on sites during discussion.    Planning Commissioner Wang thanked staff and consultants for work done on Housing  Element sites.     Planning Vice Chair Madhdhipatla thanked staff and consultants for work done on Housing  Element sites, as well as public participation.     PC 09-13-2022 22 of 439 Planning and Housing Commissions Minutes           July 5, 2022 CC  Housing Vice Chair Tatachari thanked public for participation.    Mr. Flower encouraged public participation in the Housing Balancing act survey that concludes  on July 12, and the Community meeting on July 20 for youth and young adults.    FUTURE AGENDA SETTING – none     ADJOURNMENT    At 11:59 p.m., Planning Commission Chair Scharf adjourned the joint special meeting.    _/s/Cyrah Caburian____________________  Cyrah Caburian, Administrative Assistant  PC 09-13-2022 23 of 439 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 22-10861 Agenda Date: 9/13/2022 Agenda #: 3. Subject: Approve the July 12 Planning Commission Minutes Approve the July 12 Planning Commission Minutes CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 9/8/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ PC 09-13-2022 24 of 439 DRAFT MINUTES CUPERTINO PLANNING COMMISSION Tuesday, July 12, 2022 REGULAR MEETING At 6:45 p.m. Planning Commission Chair Steven Scharf called the Regular Planning Commission meeting to order. This was a teleconference meeting with no physical location. ROLL CALL Present: Chair Steven Scharf, Vice Chair Muni Madhdhipatla, Commissioners Sanjiv Kapil, R Wang. Absent: Commissioner Vikram Saxena. All Commissioners teleconferenced for the meeting. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Subject: Approve the June 13 Parks and Recreation, Planning, and Bicycle Pedestrian Commissions Joint Special Meeting Minutes Recommended Action: Approve the June 13 Parks and Recreation, Planning, and Bicycle Pedestrian Commissions Joint Special Meeting Minutes Written communications for this item include a desk item with minor revision to draft minutes that was sent to the Commission prior to the meeting. Chair Scharf moved and Commissioner Wang seconded to approve the Approve the June 13 Parks and Recreation, Planning, and Bicycle Pedestrian Commissions Joint Special Meeting Minutes. Ayes: Scharf, Kapil, Wang. Noes: None. Abstain: Madhdhipatla. Absent: Saxena. POSTPONEMENTS – None ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None PC 09-13-2022 25 of 439 Planning Commission Minutes July 12, 2022 CONSENT CALENDAR – None PUBLIC HEARINGS 2. Subject: Hillside Exception to allow a maintenance road within an existing residential property on slopes greater than 30%. (Application No(s).: EXC-2019-003, EA-2022-001; Applicant(s): Bruce and Joyce Steakley; Location: 21750 Rainbow Drive; APN #366-03- 064) Recommended Action: That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolutions to: 1. Approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA-2022-001) (Attachment 1); and 2. Approve the Hillside Exception (EXC-2019-003) (Attachment 2) Planning Manager Piu Ghosh introduced Senior Planner Gian Martire who gave a presentation on the development proposal and exception permit application on the Rainbow Drive property. Purpose of application is to provide a maintenance road that will direct access to lower portion of property without going through neighboring parcels. Written Communications for this item included an email voicing support for the project and was received before the meeting and sent to both Commissions. Chair Scharf opened the public comment period and the following people spoke: Quan Yuan (voiced support for project) Lisa Warren Chair Scharf closed the public comment period. Mr. Martire, Ms. Ghosh and applicants Joyce and Bruce Steakley answered questions from the Commission. Commissioner Kapil expressed concern regarding soil erosion; it was clarified that further review would be conducted by the Public Works Department for grading permits. State and Federal agencies are also reviewing the project for conformance with their respective standards. Commissioner Wang moved and Vice Chair Madhdhipatla seconded to adopt resolutions. Ayes: Scharf, Madhdhipatla, Kapil, Wang. Noes: None. Abstain: None. Absent: Saxena. STUDY SESSION – None PC 09-13-2022 26 of 439 Planning Commission Minutes July 12, 2022 OLD BUSINESS – None NEW BUSINESS – None STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS Ms. Ghosh thanked Commission for their input and feedback for the Housing Element Update site selection and inventory; the Commission will be notified when these sites will be discussed and approved at a future City Council meeting Vice Chair Madhdhipatla will attend the July Mayor’s Meeting with Commissioners on behalf of Commissioner Wang. FUTURE AGENDA SETTING • Wang – 5G cell phone towers, status update. (second by Scharf); was adopted by City Work Plan (Michael); Piu and public works work plan, cannot direct but will determine if presentation is ready to present to PC. ADJOURNMENT At 7:24 p.m., Chair Scharf adjourned the meeting. _/s/Cyrah Caburian____________________ Cyrah Caburian, Administrative Assistant PC 09-13-2022 27 of 439 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 21-10109 Agenda Date: 9/13/2022 Agenda #: 4. Subject: Tentative Map to consider the subdivision of one 1.25 acre parcel into six parcels ranging between 7,526 square feet and 9,615 square feet, Two-Story Permits and Minor Residential Permits to consider the development of six single-family homes each with a second story balcony.(Application No.'s: TM-2021-006, R-2021-040, -041, -042, -043, -045, and RM-2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026); Applicant: Alok Damireddy; Location: 20860 McClellan Road; APN: 359-20-030) Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the draft resolutions (Attachments 1-3), recommending that the City Council: 1. Approve the Tentative Map (TM-2021-006); 2. Approve the Two-Story Permits (R-2021-040, -041, -042, -043, -045); and 3. Approve Minor Residential Permits (RM-2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026) CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 9/8/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ PC 09-13-2022 28 of 439 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Meeting: September 13, 2022 Subject Tentative Map to consider the subdivision of one 1.25 acre parcel into six parcels ranging between 7,526 square feet and 9,615 square feet, Two-Story Permits and Minor Residential Permits to consider the development of six single -family homes each with a second story balcony Recommended Actions Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the draft resolutions (Attachments 1-3), recommending that the City Council: 1. Find the actions exempt from CEQA 2. Approve the Tentative Map (TM-2021-006); 3. Approve the Two-Story Permits (R-2021-040, -041, -042, -043, -045); and 4. Approve Minor Residential Permits (RM-2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026) Project Data: Neighborhood Area Jollyman Existing Proposed General Plan Land Use Designation Low Residential (1-5 DU/ac) No change Zoning R1-10 No change1 Parking Per Unit 4 2 garage and 2 driveway On Street 2 1 onsite in driveway and 1 on- street2 PC 09-13-2022 29 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 2 Net lot area Lot Width FAR (not including streamlined ADU) Height Lot 1 8,851 69 feet 3,719 s.f. (43.3%) 27’ Lot 2 7,535 60 feet 3,385 s.f. (44.9%) 26’-4” Lot 3 7,532 60 feet 3,385 s.f. (44.9%) 26’-11” Lot 4 7,526 63 feet 3,385 s.f. (44.97%) 26’-4” Lot 5 8,469 62 feet 4,745 s.f. (43%) 25’ Lot 6 9,615 38 feet 4,025 s.f. (42%) 27’-1” Project Consistency General Plan Yes Zoning Yes, pursuant to state law Environmental Review Categorically Exempt 1Pursuant to state law, rezoning not required. See discussion in Analysis section below. 2One additional onsite parking space is provided per unit to be consistent with the requirement of providing two offsite parking spaces pursuant to CMC Section 19.124.040 Regulations for Off-Street Parking. Discussion Background: Site and Location Description The project is located at the southwest corner of McClellan Road and Cherryland Drive, a private street, in the Jollyman neighborhood area of the General Plan. The property is bounded by McClellan Road to the north, Cherryland Drive to the east, Church uses to the west and residential single-Figure 1: Project Location PC 09-13-2022 30 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 3 family homes to the south. (see Figure 1). Other surrounding uses include De Anza College to the west and single family residential homes to the north, east, and south of the property. The site has a gross area of 1.25 acres, which, after required frontage improvements to complete the street and sidewalk on the west side of Cherryland Drive, will have a net area of 1.13 acres. Application Requests The applicant, Alok Damireddy, is requesting permits to allow the construction of six two story single family residential homes on a 1.25-acre site currently occupied by a single- family residence, garage, and an accessory structure used to park/stor e heavy vehicles and boats (See Attachment 7). The project would demolish the existing structures and construct six two story single family residential units with second story balconies, six attached accessory dwelling units (ADU), and associated landscape and street improvements. The ADUs are subject to a separate ministerial approval process under Government Code section 65852.2. A Tentative Map is proposed to divide the property from one parcel (1) to six (6) parcels consisting of six single family homes. The following City permits would be required: Six Two Story Permits, and six Minor Residential Permits. In addition, the applicant is requesting that the City determine the project to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Project History On October 22, 2021, the applicant applied for a rezoning, tentative map, and six two - story permit applications. The project proposal was being processed and a Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was concurrently prepared for the project. On May 19, 2022, the Environmental Review Committee considered whether the Draft Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was the appropriate environmental document for the proposed project. The Environmental Review Committee determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration was the appropriate environmental review document for the proposed project but directed that additional soil testing be conducted through a scope of work agreed upon by the city’s third party Geotech reviewer and that any additional measures from the peer review be incorporated in the Mitigated Negative Declaration, prior to Planning Commission review of the project. On June 14, 2022, at the request of the applicant, City staff reevaluated the proposed project under the Housing Accountability Act (Government Code Section 65589.5(j)(4)) and guidelines issued by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), which state that a project that complies with all applicable General Plan standards PC 09-13-2022 31 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 4 and criteria is not required to comply with zoning requirements that are inconsistent with those standards. Moreover, so long as the applicant complied with applicable General Plan requirements and zoning requirements consistent with the General Plan, the project would qualify for an Infill Exemption CEQA., Having received this information from the City, the applicant elected to revise the project to comply with all applicable objective standards and to pursue an infill exemption in lieu of finalizing the Draft IS/MND. The applicant has nonetheless committed to complying with the mitigation measures that were identified with the IS/MND that was previously prepared as project conditions of approval. Analysis: Rezoning and Housing Accountability Act The Housing Accountability Act (HAA), California Government Code Section 65589.5(j)(4), requires that when a proposed project is consistent with objective General Plan standards and criteria but the current zoning for the project site is inconsistent with the General Plan, the local agency shall not require a rezoning. While the local agency may require the proposed housing development project to comply with objective standards and criteria of a zoning district which is consistent with the General Plan, the standards and criteria must be applied in a manner which will facilitate and accommodate development at the density allowed on the site by the General Plan and proposed by the housing development project. The project site has a General Plan land use designation of low density residential (1 -5 du/acre). The proposed project site is 1.25 acres and, consistent with HAA, at the maximum density of five dwelling units per acre, the applicant may propose a project with a maximum of six residential units. Furthermore, since buildout of the project site consistent with the R1-10 zoning standards would not allow development of six units on the site, the development standards for the R1-10 zoning district do not apply. Instead, HCD guidance provides that the City “may require the proposed housing developme nt project to comply with the objective standards and criteria contained elsewhere in the zoning code that are consistent with the general plan designation.” Staff determined that the R1-7.5 zoning district standards are consistent with the General Plan land use designation and are therefore applicable to this project. Additionally, state law requires that when a proposed housing development complies with the applicable, objective General Plan and zoning standards, a local agency ‘s denial PC 09-13-2022 32 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 5 of the project or approval at a reduced density must be based on written findings supported by substantial evidence that:  The development would have a specific adverse impact on public health or safety unless disapproved, or approved at a lower density; and  There is no feasible method to satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the specific adverse impact, other than the disapproval, or approval at a lower density. The local agency must additionally identify and provide written documentation of the reasons why a proposed housing development is inconsistent, not in compliance, or not in conformity with an applicable plan, program, policy, ordinance, standard, requirement, or other provision within 30 days of the date that the application for the housing development project is determined to be complete if the housing development project contains 150 or fewer housing units. The proposed project has been determined to comply with applicable, objective General Plan and zoning standards, including maximum height, density, minimum setbacks, useable private open space, and number of parking spaces. As a result, staff is not aware of any basis to make the findings listed above. General Plan and Zoning Compliance The proposed use is consistent with the General Plan Land Use Designation of Low Density Residential, allowing 1-5 dwelling units per acre. Low Density Residential is intended to promote a suburban lifestyle of detached single-family homes. The property is located in the Jollyman neighborhood, which is located west of S. De Anza Boulevard, the major north-south arterial in the City and south of Stevens Creek Blvd, the major east- west arterial in the City. The site is surrounded predominantly by single -family residential homes and is generally located on the valley floor with minimal changes in grade. As previously discussed, the project is being required to meet the requirements of the R1- 7.5 zoning district. The project proposal is consistent with the site development regulations for an R1-7.5 zoning district pursuant to Chapter 19.28 Single Family Residential Ordinance of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The applicant has applied for a Tentative Map to allow subdivision of one lot into six lots ranging from 7,526 sq. ft. to 9,615 sq. ft. to develop single family residences on each lot and provide on-site improvements to complete the private street on Cherryland Drive. Staff has evaluated the project’s consistency with the General Plan and has concluded that based on the site’s General Plan Land Use Designation (Low Density Residential), state PC 09-13-2022 33 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 6 law guidance, and zoning compliance, the proposed project supports several of the City’s other General Plan goals including: Chapter 3: Land Use and Community Design  POLICY LU-3.3: BUILDING DESIGN Ensure that building layouts and design are compatible with the surrounding environment and enhance the streetscape and pedestrian activity.  Strategy LU-3.3.1: Attractive Design - Emphasize attractive building and site design by paying careful attention to building scale, mass, placement, architecture, materials, landscaping, screening of equipment, loading areas, signage and other design considerations.  Strategy LU-3.3.5: Building Location. Encourage building location and entries closer to the street while meeting appropriate landscaping and setback requirements.  Strategy LU-3.3.6: Architecture and Articulation. Promote high-quality architecture, appropriate building articulation and use of special materials and architectural detailing to enhance visual interest.  Policy LU-27.2: Relationship to the Street: Ensure that new development in and adjacent to neighborhoods improve the walkability of neighborhoods by providing inviting entries, stoops and porches along the street frontage, compatible building design and reducing visual impacts of garages.  Strategy LU-27.7.1: Lot Size. Ensure that subdivision and lot line adjustment requests respect the neighborhood lot size patterns. Consider revisions to lot size requirements if the neighborhood lot pattern is different from the zoning requirements.  Policy LU-27.4: Connections - Support pedestrian and bicycling improvements that improve access with neighborhoods to parks, schools and local retail, and between neighborhoods. Support traffic calming measures rather than blocking the street to reduce traffic impacts on neighborhoods. Tentative Tract Map The project proposes seven (7) separate parcels to be created from one (1) existing parcel (see Attachment 7). Six lots will each contain a single-family dwelling and the seventh lot is to accommodate the widening and completion of an existing private roadway and cul- de-sac on Cherryland Drive. A condition of approval has been added to the Tentative Map to require reciprocal ingress and egress access across Lot Seven and an agreement between the Cherryland HOA and applicant for McClellan Subdivision shall be established for ingress, egress, and maintenance of the fully widened private roadway prior to Final Map approval. PC 09-13-2022 34 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 7 Development Regulations (Zoning) The project proposes to develop the six subdivided lots with six two -story single-family residences each with an attached accessory dwelling unit and a second story balcony. The zoning designation of R1-7.5 would require each lot to be a minimum of 7,500 sq. ft., which would allow for a single-family residence that is a minimum size of 3,375 sq. ft. As shown in the table above, lots range from 7,526 to 8,851 and the six homes range between 3,719 sq. ft. and 4,025 sq. ft. with attached accessory dwelling units ranging from 557 sq. ft. to 600 sq. ft. The proposed homes comply with build ing development standards including the minimum floor area ratio and lot coverage requirements pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 19.28, proposing a 45% minimum floor area ratio and 50% lot coverage for each residence. The six single family homes comply with the first and second floor setbacks for each lot. Site Planning and Architectural Design The project would include demolishing all existing buildings and removal of several on- site unprotected trees as reviewed in the Arborist Report (See Ap pendix A in Infill Exemption Memorandum) to allow for the development of six residences on six new residential lots. The proposed subdivision would allow for six new lots and development of six new two-story single-family residences, each with a second story balcony and attached ADU on the west side of Cherryland Drive. The development provides vehicle and pedestrian access through Cherryland Drive from McClellan Road. Each single- family home includes an attached accessory dwelling unit, garage, second story balconies, and a rear yard for the homes. The site also incorporates on-site and off-site parking spaces as required by the City’s parking ordinance. The houses all have prominent front porches and entries that face the existing homes on Cherryland Drive to create a strong front façade that promotes interaction with the private street and generally creates a neighborhood in the cul-de-sac. As shown in the Figure 2, the project proposes decorative landscaping along the front yards of the homes, privacy planting along the viewsheds to mitigate privacy impacts to adjacent neighbors from the new second story windows and balconies, and a front yard tree as required pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code Section 19.28.120 and Chapter 14.15. The project also proposes to maintain three protected trees on-site, two coast live oak trees located near/on lot one and one deodar cedar at the corner of Cherryland Drive and McClellan Road. There is one unprotected tree to remain at the rear of lot one, three new street trees along McClellan Road, and six trees proposed on each lot that are not development trees, thus not considered protected trees on the property. PC 09-13-2022 35 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 8 The proposed project provides a robust landscape plan that includes a wide variety of drought tolerant shrubs and trees throughout the frontage of the property. Decorative, permeable pavers for the driveway along with retention basins in the front yard are proposed to contribute to drainage for the site as recommended and approved by Cupertino’s Public Works Department. By integrating projecting and recessed wall planes, wall height variation, and roofline variation, the applicant has worked to reduce the massing of the custom detached single- family homes. The applicant has introduced different projections and a variation of materials along the building frontage that help to reduce the massing of the structure (see Figure 3 on the next page). The applicant incorporates sophisticated building materials which include a mix of vertical and horizontal composite siding and stone veneer that blend the neutral color tones of the homes. The living area is closer to the street, while the garage is setback more to ar ticulate the street facing elevation. Second story walls are articulated with an assortment of window sizes/bold trims and a variation in materials to reduce the apparent mass of the second story. The custom homes display a conscious mix of vertical or horizontal aligned windows, doors and architectural elements that provide a symmetry along the building facade. The proposed design is substantially consistent with Section 19.28.110 Single Family Residential Design Guidelines and Principles of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The project also includes second story balconies at the front of each residence, where privacy impacts to adjacent neighbor’s side yards are mitigated as discussed in the site planning section above. The remaining six Minor Residential Perm it application requests are proposed to allow for the six second story balconies to be consistent with CMC Section Figure 2: Proposed Landscape Plan PC 09-13-2022 36 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 9 19.28.040 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The balconies range from 55 sq. ft. to 206 sq. ft. in size and propose a decorative railing that is at least 75% transparent. As discussed in the site planning section above, potential privacy impacts from the second story balconies are mitigated with proposed privacy plantings that provide screening for adjacent neighbors as required by the Cupertino Municipal Code. Traffic, Circulation, Pedestrian, and Bicycle Improvements As part of the environmental and municipal code analysis, traffic impacts of the proposed project were evaluated in the Infill Exemption Memorandum. Specifically, CEQA guidelines provides specific considerations for evaluating the projects vehicle miles traveled (VMT) which is found to be the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. Additionally, Chapter 17.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code provides standards allowing some projects to be screened out or assumed to not have VMT impacts if they fall within the following categories: 1. Local serving retail of up to 500,000 square feet. 2. 100% affordable housing projects. 3. Projects located within ¼ mile of Stevens Creek Blvd (from SR 85 east), measured in walking distance. 4. Small projects that generate less than 110 new trips per day, and do not exceed square footage thresholds. Figure 3: Renderings PC 09-13-2022 37 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 10 The project is expected to generate an average of 101 new daily vehicle tr ips and is a residential project of less than 20 units, which would categorize the proposed project as a small project that generates less than 110 new trips per day and does not exceed the square footage thresholds per the City’s White Paper on VMT. Conse quently, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant effect related to VMT. The proposed project development has been parked to meet the City’s parking requirements found in Chapter 19.124: Parking Regulations. The six (6) single-family homes each provide five on-site parking spaces and one off-site parking space. Two (2) of the on-site parking spaces are to be located within an enclosed garage and three on- site parking spaces are to be open and proposed on the driveway for each residence. The one off-site parking space is provided along the street. There is no required bicycle parking for single-family homes on residentially zoned lots. The proposed project also includes pedestrian and bicycle related improvements along McClellan Road, which include but not limited to, modifications to the raised island along McClellan Road due to the existing driveway removals and to meet trash collection requirements. All improvements shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to Building Final and a condition of approval has been added to the project to ensure completion of the improvements. Other Department/Agency Review The City’s Building Division, Public Works Department, Environmental Services Division, and the Santa Clara County Fire Department have reviewed and conditioned the project. Environmental Review An Infill Development Project Exemption Memorandum has been prepared for the project (See Attachment 5). Article 19 of the CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15300 and 15333, includes a list of classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and are therefore exempt from CEQA. Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines provides a categorical exemption (Class 32) for infill development projects that meet the following criteria: A. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. B. The proposed development occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. C. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. PC 09-13-2022 38 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 11 D. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. E. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. As noted above, the project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation for the site and applicable requirements of the R1-7.5 zoning district. The Infill Exemption Memorandum provides additional analysis to support a Class 32 exemption for the project. Prior to deciding to pursue an infill exemption, the applicant prepared a Draft IS/MND that was revied by staff and considered by the ERC. The applicant has committed to complying with mitigation measures included in the Draft IS/MND, and those measures have been included in the recommended conditions of approval of the project. Those conditions include the following:  Geology & Soils: All grading and foundation plans for the proposed project shall be designed by a Civil and Structural Engineer, peer-reviewed by a third-party qualified Geotechnical Engineer, paid for by the applicant, and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, and Chief Building Official, prior to issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever comes first, to ensure that all geotechnical recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed project by GeoEngineering Consultants are properly incorporated and utilized in the project design.  Hazards and Hazardous materials Phase II Recommendations: Prior to initiation of demolition or construction activities, the project applicant shall comply with all applicable recommendations within the Limited Phase II ESA prepared for the proposed project by ReDevelop Inc. including the excavation and proper disposal of OCP impacted soils, the development of a Health and Safety Plan to protect workers during grading and construction activities, and the installation of vapor barrier protection for residences. OCP-impacted soils located within the project site shall be removed to a depth of one foot and off-hauled by a licensed hazardous waste contractor (Class A) and contractor personnel that have completed 40-hour OSHA hazardous training. The soil shall be disposed of appropriately in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations associated with hazardous waste. Prior to the issuance of the first grading and/or building permit, the applicant’s compliance with the recommendations shall be verified by the City of Cupertino Community Development Department and the Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department through their Voluntary Cleanup Program,.  Hazards and Hazardous Materials Asbestos And/or Lead Assessor Consultation: Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to complete and PC 09-13-2022 39 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 12 submit for review to the Building Department an asbestos and lead survey. If asbestos containing materials or lead-containing materials are not discovered during the survey, further mitigation related to asbestos-containing materials or lead containing materials shall not be required. If asbestos containing materials and/or lead-containing materials are discovered by the survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestos- containing materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with current California Occupational Health and Safety (Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal of the on -site structures. The plan shall include the requirement that work shall be conducted by a Cal -OSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529 and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and lead training, engineering controls, and certifications. The applicant shall submit the work plan to the City of Cupertino for review and approval. The City has the right to defer the work plan to the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health for additional review. Materials containing more than one (1) percent asbestos that is friable are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one (1) percent friable asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD Section 11-2-303. Public Outreach and Noticing The following table is a brief summary of the noticing done for this project: Notice of Public Hearing, Site Notice & Legal Ad Agenda  Site Signage (10 days prior to the hearing)  Legal ad placed in newspaper (at least 10 days prior to the hearing)  Public hearing notices were mailed to property owners within 300’ of the project site (10 days prior to the hearing)  Posted on the City’s official notice bulletin board (one week prior to the hearing) Posted on the City of Cupertino’s website (one week prior to the hearing) Public Comment Prior to preparation and publication of the staff report, staff received public comment and concerns from the adjacent property owners on the east side of Cherryland Drive, the Cherryland HOA. Staff reviewed the public comment, recorded the public comment, and provided a response (see italicized) to the commenters as follows: PC 09-13-2022 40 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 13  The commenter, who was also involved in development of the adjacent property, indicates that the conceptual private street layout plan anticipated for future development of the subject property indicated a 19-foot-6-inch-wide street, sidewalk, and landscape improvements on both sides of the street. However, the proposed project now includes a 14-foot-6-inch-wide street, sidewalk, and landscape improvements. Cherryland HOA requests that the improvements match the street layout plan that was conceptualized with the first development. Although the conceptual plan was included as part of the Cherryland project plans, it was not a binding requirement for the property that was not subject to City actions at that time. The layout was conceptualized with the intent to show possible roadway layouts for a future development and that a complete cul-de-sac private street would be possible in the future upon redevelopment of the property to the west. Furthermore, the development project meets Public Works standard requirements for minimum road and sidewalk widths. Therefore, at this time, there is no need to revise the proposed plans to match the conceptual layout envisioned in the past.  The McClellan Rd subdivision should provide a total of 2.33 parking spaces on the street for each new house. The ADU for each new house will also make on street parking unfavorable to the existing residences on the east side of Cherryland Drive. The proposal is taking away the on-street parking spaces from the existing residences on the east side of Cherryland Drive. The McClellan Road subdivision is required to provide two covered and two uncovered parking spaces on-site and two parking spaces off site for each unit to comply with CMC Chapter 19.124. The subdivision is proposing five on-site parking spaces (two covered and three uncovered on driveway) and one offsite parking space for each unit. Per State law, the City cannot impose nor require additional parking spaces for ADU proposals. Therefore, the proposed subdivision complies with the minimum off street and on street parking requirements. Furthermore, the proposed development does not propose to eliminate any existing on-street parking spaces that were available for use by the existing Cherryland Drive residents.  The garage doors of the existing homes on the east side of Cherryland Drive do not face Cherryland Drive, which was a request from the City during the review of the development. This requirement should also be proposed for the new development. The McClellan Road subdivision proposes garages facing Cherryland Drive. The Municipal Code does not provide an objective standard that requires the garages to front a specific street PC 09-13-2022 41 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 14 and the proposed access to the garages are in compliance with Chapter 19.124, as well as the Public Works Department driveway standards.  The elevation of the new lot developed adjacent to 20852 Cherryland Drive should not be any taller. The proposed lot (lot six), adjacent to 20852 Cherryland Drive is proposed to be at the same elevation as measured from the finished pad elevations. The proposed cross sections indicate the elevations of the adjacent existing residence and the proposed residence on Sheet C3 of the project plans (Attachment 7).  The five year bond for maintenance of Cherryland Drive from the developer of 20860 McClellan Road needs to be in place before the final inspection from the Public Works Department of the City of Cupertino. The Public Works Department requires a five-year bond for maintenance of public streets and rights of way. They also indicated that a condition about maintenance for private street serving Cherryland subdivision and the McClellan subdivision has been added to the conditions of approval of the project. The issue being raised for who would bond for the private street, for the next five years, appears to stem from construction related concerns, and is a private matter, which can be negotiated by the two parties. Furthermore, Public Works has reviewed the comment and will ensure that all City standards and requirements will be complied with for the McClellan Road Subdivision. Conclusion Staff recommends approval of the project since the project and conditions of approval address all concerns related to the proposed development and all findings for approval of the project, consistent with Chapter 18.28, 19.156, and 19.168 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, can be made.1 1Under the Housing Accountability Act (Gov. Code, § 65589.5(j)(1)), subjective findings contained in these Chapters of the Municipal Code cannot be a basis for disapproving the project or imposing a condition that the project be developed at a lower density unless the specific findings in Government Code 65589.5(j)(1)(A) and (B) are made PC 09-13-2022 42 of 439 TM-2021-006, V-2022-001, R-2021-040 September 13, 2022 to -045, RM-2022-015 to -017, 20860 McClellan Road RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 Page 15 Next Steps The Planning Commission’s recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for its decision on the project. The City Council’s decision will be final unless reconsidered within 10 days of the decision. The applicant may apply for building permits at that time. Prepared by: Brianne Harkousha, Associate Planner Reviewed by: Piu Ghosh, Planning Manager Approved by: Albert Salvador, Acting Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS: 1 – Draft Resolution for TM-2021-006 2 – Draft Resolution for R-2021-040 to R-2021-045 3 – Draft Resolution for RM-2022-015 to -016, RM-2022-022, RM-2022-024 to -026 4 – Infill Exemption Memorandum 5 – Public comment and email from Cherryland HOA 6 – Project Plans PC 09-13-2022 43 of 439 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE PARCEL INTO SIX INDIVIDUAL PARCELS LOCATED AT 20860 MCCLELLAN ROAD (APN: 359-20-030) The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the Tentative Map, in substantially similar form to the Draft Resolution attached hereto as Exhibit TM: PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino the 13th day of September 2022, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Piu Ghosh Steven Scharf Planning Manager Planning Commission Chair PC 09-13-2022 44 of 439 EXHIBIT TM RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A TENTATIVE MAP TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF ONE PARCEL INTO SIX INDIVIDUAL PARCELS LOCATED AT 20860 MCCLELLAN ROAD (APN: 359-20-030) SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: TM-2021-006 Applicant: District McClellan LLC, c/o Alok Damireddy Location: 20860 McClellan Road; APN#359-20-030 SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR A TENTATIVE MAP: WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino received an application for a Tentative Map (Application No. TM-2021-006) as described in Section I of this resolution; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelin es; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive staff’s presentation and public testimony, and to consider the information contained in the Infill Exemption Memorandum along with all staff reports, other pertinent documents, and all written and oral statements received prior to and at the public hearing,; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022 the Planning Commission recommended on a X-X vote that the City Council find the project exempt from CEQA and approve Tentative Tract Map (TM-2021-006 in substantially similar form to the Resolution presented (Resolution No. ______); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino is the decision-making body for this Resolution; and WHEREAS, all necessary public notices having been given as required by the Municipal Code of the City of Cupertino and the Government Code, and on October ___, 2022, the City Council held a public hearing to consider the Tentative Map; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the application for a Tentative Map; and PC 09-13-2022 45 of 439 EXHIBIT TM WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. That the proposed subdivision map is consistent with the City of Cupertino General Plan. The subject property has been determined to be consistent with the General Plan. The proposed project complies with General Plan policies that include density, maximum building height, building design, site planning, and frontage improvements. 2. That the design and improvements of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the General Plan. The off-site improvements are consistent with the City’s General Plan policies related to pedestrian and bicycle safety etc. by improving the street frontage and minimizing curb-cuts. 3. That the site is physically suitable for the type development contemplated under the approved subdivision. The proposed subdivision is compatible with the adjoining land uses and no physical constraints are present that would conflict with anticipated land use development. There are no topographical anomalies that differentiate this property from adjacent properties. The site is located on the valley floor, as well as not listed within any environmentally sensitive zone. 4. That the site is physically suitable for the intensity of development contemplated under the approved subdivision. The subject property is physically suitable in size and shape in conformance to develop ment standards and is appropriately configured to accommodate single family residential development. 5. That the design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat. The proposed subdivision design and improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems nor substantially injure fish and wildlife or their habitat because the property is a developed site and located in an urbanized area where residential land use is allowed. 6. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements associated therewith are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The proposed development is designed to meet development standards and applicable codes and regulations. Any potential environmental impacts associated with the project are to be mitigated as part of the project approval. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and necessary improvements are not likely to cause serious public health concerns. PC 09-13-2022 46 of 439 EXHIBIT TM 7. That the design of the subdivision and its associated improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. No easement or right-of-way exists currently that would be impeded or conflict with the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 3 thereof, and those contained in all other Resolutions approved for this Project, the City Council does hereby: 1. Exercises its independent judgment and determines that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15332. Section 15332 exemption applies projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the following criteria: a. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b. The proposed development occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. c. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the criteria stated above (Section 15332) and as discussed in the Infill Exemption Memorandum prepared for the project, will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. Approve the application for a Tentative Map, Application No. TM-2021-006, and 3. Find that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based are contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. TM-2021-006 as set forth in the Minutes of the City Council Meeting of MONTH DAY, YEAR and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT. 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on a plan set entitled “District McClellan “, consisting of one hundred and twenty-nine (129) sheets except as may be amended by conditions in PC 09-13-2022 47 of 439 EXHIBIT TM this resolution. In the event there are conflicts between the floor plan, cross sections and elevation drawings, the elevation drawings take precedence. 2. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the building plans. 3. ACCURACY OF PROJECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 4. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 5. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. TM -2021-006, R-2021-040 to R-2021- 045, and RM-2021-015 to -016, -022, -024 to -026. 6. CITY’S BELOW MARKET RATE (BMR) HOUSING PROGRAM Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the applicant shall participate in the City’s Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing Program by paying the Below Market Rate residential mitigation fee for five (5) new single-family homes concurrent with issuance of building permits at the rate in effect at that time. The current fee is $20.00 per net new s.f. The fee will be calculated based on the weighted average of the floor area (excluding garage) for each home. 7. LANDSCAPE PROJECT SUBMITTAL Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full Landscape Documentation Package, per sections 14.15.050 A, B, C, and D of the Landscape Ordinance, for projects with landscape area 500 square feet or more or elect to submit a Prescriptive Compliance Application per sections 14.15.040 A, B, and C for pro jects with landscape area between 500 square feet and 2,500 square feet. The Landscape Documentation Package or Prescriptive Compliance Application shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits, and additional requirements per sections 14.15.040 D, E, PC 09-13-2022 48 of 439 EXHIBIT TM F, and G or 14.15.050 E, F, G, H, and I will be required to be reviewed and approved prior to final inspections. 8. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 9. DUST CONTROL The following construction practices shall be implemented during all phases of construction for the proposed project to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site: a. Water all exposed surfaces areas (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) a t least twice daily and more often during windy periods to prevent visible dust from leaving the site; active areas adjacent to windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. PC 09-13-2022 49 of 439 EXHIBIT TM The applicant shall incorporate the City’s construction best management practices into the building permit plan set prior to any grading, excavation, foundation or building permit issuance. 10. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND NOISE LIMITS a. All grading activities shall be limited to the dry season (April 15 to October 1), unless permitted otherwise by the Director of Public works. b. Construction hours and noise limits shall be compliant with all requirements of Chapter 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. c. Grading, street construction, underground utility and demolition hours for work done more than 750 feet away from residential areas shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Grading, street construction, demolition or underground utility work within 750 feet of residential areas shall not occur on Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, and during the nighttime period as defined in Section 10.48.053(b) of the Municipal Code. d. Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays as defined in Chapter 10.48 of the Municipal Code. Night time construction is allowed if compliant with nighttime standards of Section 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. e. Rules and regulations pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of an applicant appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. f. The applicant shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. The applicant shall comply with the above grading and construction hours and noise limit requirements unless otherwise indicated. 11. NESTING BIRDS Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Department of Fish and Game Code. a. Construction and tree removal/pruning activities shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. If feasible, tree removal and/or pruning shall be completed before the start of the nesting season to help preclude nesting. The nesting season for most birds and raptors in the San Francisco Bay area extends from February 1 through August 31. Preconstruction surveys (described below) are not required for tree removal or construction activities outside the nesting PC 09-13-2022 50 of 439 EXHIBIT TM period. If construction activities and any required tree removal occur during the nesting season (February 1 and August 31), a qualified ornithologist shall be required to conduct surveys prior to tree removal or construction activities. Preconstruction surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal, pruning or construction. Preconstruction surveys shall be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be stopped. During this survey, the ornithologist shall inspect all trees and other possible nesting habitats in and immediately adjacent to the construction areas for nests. b. If the survey does not identify any nesting birds that would be affected by construction activities, no further mitigat ion is required. If an active nest containing viable eggs or young birds is found sufficiently close to work areas to be disturbed by these activities, their locations shall be documented and protective measures implemented under the direction of the qualified ornithologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. c. Protective measures shall include establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e. demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by the qualified ornithologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds. The active nest within an exclusion zone shall be monitored on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm nesting status. The radius of an exclusion zone may be increased by the qualified biologist, if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The pro tection measures and buffers shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active. d. A final report on nesting birds and raptors, including survey methodology, survey date(s), map of identified active nests (if any), and protection measures (if required), shall be submitted to the Planning Manager, through the building permit review process, and be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to the start of grading. 12. GEOLOGY AND SOILS All grading and foundation plans for the proposed project shall be designed by a Civil and Structural Engineer, peer-reviewed by a third-party qualified Geotechnical Engineer, paid for by the applicant, and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, and Chief Building Official, prior to issuance of building permit or grading permit, PC 09-13-2022 51 of 439 EXHIBIT TM whichever comes first, to ensure that all geotechnical recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed project by Ge oEngineering Consultants are properly incorporated and utilized in the project design. 13. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PHASE II RECOMMENDATIONS Prior to initiation of demolition or construction activities, the project applicant shall comply with all applicable recommendations within the Limited Phase II ESA prepared for the proposed project by ReDevelop Inc. including the excavation and proper disposal of OCP impacted soils, the development of a Health and Safety Plan to protect workers during grading and construction activities, and the installation of vapor barrier protection for residences. OCP-impacted soils located within the project site shall be removed to a depth of one foot and off-hauled by a licensed hazardous waste contractor (Class A) and contractor personnel that have completed 40-hour OSHA hazardous training. The soil shall be disposed of appropriately in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations associated with hazardous waste. That the applicant has complied with the recommendations shall be verified by the City of Cupertino Community Development Department and the Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department through their Voluntary Cleanup Program, prior to the issuance of the first grading and/or building permit. 14. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASBESTOS AND/OR LEAD ASSESSOR CONSULTATION Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to complete and submit for review to the Building Department an asbestos and lead survey. If asbestos containing materials or lead-containing materials are not discovered during the survey, further mitigation related to asbestos-containing materials or lead containing materials shall not be required. If asbestos containing materials and/or lead - containing materials are discovered by the survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with current California Occupational Health and Safety (Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal of the on-site structures. The plan shall include the requirement that work shall be conducted by a Cal-OSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529 and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and lead training, engineering controls, and certifications. The applicant shall submit the work plan to the City of Cupertino for review and approval. The City has the right to defer the work plan to the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health for additional review. Materials containing more than one (1) percent asbestos that is PC 09-13-2022 52 of 439 EXHIBIT TM friable are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one (1) percent friable asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD Section 11-2-303. 15. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by la w, the applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City’s choice, and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the “indemnified parties”) from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action, suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as “proceeding”) brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant related to any Ordinance, Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties in itiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such attorneys’ fees and costs shall include amounts paid to the City’s outside counsel and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs awards, including attorneys’ fees awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against the indemnified parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a Reimbursement Agreement to govern any such reimbursement. The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City for all costs incurred in additional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting, revising, or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report, negative declaration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by proceedings challenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project. The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages. 16. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS PC 09-13-2022 53 of 439 EXHIBIT TM The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 17. CHERRYLAND HOA The existing Cherryland CC&Rs acknowledges the granting of a reciprocal easement of the private road for a future development of the western lot. Prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, the developer/ applicant shall establish an agreement with the Cherryland HOA for ingress/egress and for maintenance that covers the fully widened private roadway Cherryland Drive. The agreement should consider how the private Cherryland Drive would be assessed for tax purposes to the adjacent property owners if the private drive were to be merged into one parcel. 18. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall work with the Cherryland HOA to obtain consensus for, and to prepare, a lot line adjustment to create one parcel for the fully widened private Cherryland Drive. Developer/applicant shall submit the necessary documentation and fees to the Public Works Department for review and approval during building permit phase. The lot line adjustment would be executed after recordation of the Cherryland HOA Agreement and Final Map recordation. 19. STREET IMPROVEMENTS & DEDICATION Roadway dedication in fee title and frontage improvements along McClellan Road will be required to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Street improvement plans and grading and drainage plans must be completed and approved prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Street improvements may include, but not be limited to, removal of existing driveways, new curb and gutter, new ADA ramp, storm drain system modifications, street tree installations, and joint pole relocation. All improvements must be completed and accepted by the City prior to Building Final Occupancy or Street Improvement Encroachment Permit acceptance whichever comes first. Additional comments will be provided during review of the plans and shall be incorporated prior to Final Map approval as reviewed by the Public Works Department. PC 09-13-2022 54 of 439 EXHIBIT TM 20. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS The Public Works Director, or his/her designee, shall have the authority to accept all offers of dedications, easements, quitclaims and other property rights and inte rests on behalf of the City. 21. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the Director of Public Works. All improvements must be completed and accepted by the City prior to Building Final Occupancy or Street Improvement Encroachment Permit acceptance whichever comes first. 22. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer shall provide/demonstrate the location of pedestrian and bicycle related improvements including, but not limited to, modifications to the raised island along McClellan Road due to the existing driveway removals and to meet trash collection requirements, consistent with the Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan and the Pedestrian Transportation Plan, and as approved by the Director of Public Works. All improvements must be completed and accepted by the City prior to Building Final Occupancy or Street Improvement Encroachment Permit acceptance whichever comes first. 23. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate on the plans that lighting fixtures are be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. Street lighting shall be installed and shall be approved by the Director of Public Works prior to Building Final Occupancy. 24. GRADING Prior to issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate that grading is in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works. 401 Certifications and 404 permits may also be required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 25. DRAINAGE Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate drainage designs and proposals to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of PC 09-13-2022 55 of 439 EXHIBIT TM the Director of Public Works and satisfy any requirements from the environmental analysis. Hydrology and pre- and post-development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of the ten percent flood water surface elevation to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Any storm water overflows or surface sheeting should be directed away from neighboring private properties and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible. All storm drain inlets shall be clearly marked with the words “No Dumping – Flows to Creek” using permanently affixed metal medallions or equivalent, as approved by the Environmental Programs Division. Additional comments will be provided and shall be incorporated prior to Final Map approval. 26. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer/applicant shall submit plans to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department that verify a minimum reservation of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, as reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of Building Permits. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan and a Storm Water Facilities Operation, Maintenance and Easement Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. PC 09-13-2022 56 of 439 EXHIBIT TM 27. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT The project developer/applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement and fees shall be executed and paid prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: Per current fee schedule ($4,947 or 5% of improvement costs) b. Grading Permit: Per current fee schedule ($3,683 or 6% of improvement costs) c. Tract Map Fee: Per current fee schedule ($12,306) d. Storm Drainage Fee: Per current fee schedule ($4,250 per AC + $322 per unit) e. Transportation Impact Fee: Per current fee schedule ($6,797 per unit) f. Encroachment Permit Fee: Per current fee schedule ($3,304) g. Park Fees: Per current fee schedule ($105,000 per unit) h. Storm Management Plan Fee Per current fee schedule ($1,670) i. Street Tree Fee: By Developer or Per current fee schedule: $481 per tree Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 28. FINAL MAP A final map will be subject to City Council approval and shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Existing buildings must be demolished prior to recordation of the final map as building(s) cannot straddle between lot lines and will be reviewed and approved by the Public Works department prior to recordation of final map. PC 09-13-2022 57 of 439 EXHIBIT TM 29. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES The Project is subject to the payment of Transportation Impact Fees under City’s Transportation Impact Fee Program (Chapter 14.02 of the Cupertino Municipal Code) and payment shall be provided prior to issuance of Building Permits. 30. PARKS The residential units are subject to the payment of parkland fees in -lieu of parkland dedication per Chapter 13.08 and Chapter 18.24 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and payment shall be provided prior to issuance of Building Permits. 31. SURVEYS Prior to issuance of Building Permits, Boundary Survey and a horizontal control plan will be required for all new construction to ensure the proposed building will be set based on the boundary survey and setback requirements. 32. TRASH, RECYCLING AND COMPOST ENCLOSURES Trash enclosure plans must be designed in accordance with the City’s “Public Works Guidelines posted at www.cupertino.org/nowaste, and to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is required prior to issuance of a building permit. (CMC 9.18.210 H & K) If the project requires trash collection along Cherryland Drive, the applicant and the adjacent Cherryland HOA shall enter into an agreement with the City prior to Final Map approval that indemnifies and holds harmless both the City and the refuse and recycling collection company (Recology) from and against any harm, damage or maintenance that may occur or become necessary to onsite paving stone driveway surfaces. 33. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT Developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non- standard appurtenances in the public road right-of-way that may include, but is not limited to, landscaping, street trees, sidewalk, pavers, and streetlights. 34. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. Developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility PC 09-13-2022 58 of 439 EXHIBIT TM underground provisions to be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the Director of Public Works. 35. TRANSFORMERS & CABINETS Electrical transformers, telephone cabinets and similar equipment shall be placed in underground vaults. The developer must receive written approval from both the Public Works Department and the Community Development Department prior to installation of any above ground equipment and prior to issuance of Building Permits. Should above ground equipment be permitted by the City, equipment and enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas, as determined by the Community Development Department. Transformers shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 36. WATER BACKFLOW PREVENTERS Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the Domestic and Fire Water Backflow preventers and similar above ground equipment shall be placed away from the public right of way and site driveways to a location approved by the Cupertino Planning Department, Santa Clara County Fire Department and the water company. 37. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. 38. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. Provide documentation to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, prior to issuance of Buildings Permits. 39. EROSION CONTROL PLAN Developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer prior to issuance of Building, Demolition, or Grading Permits. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. PC 09-13-2022 59 of 439 EXHIBIT TM 40. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project . 41. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City prior to issuance of Building Permits. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The Cit y has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 42. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. Street tree locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. 43. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City prior to issuance of Buildings Permits. 44. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. Clearance should include written approval of the location of any proposed Fire Backflow Preventers, Fire Department Connections and Fire Hydrants (typically Backflow Preventers should be located on private property adjacent to the public right of way, and fire department connections must be located within 100’ of a Fire Hydrant). 45. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed and shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of Building Permits. 46. SAN JOSE WATER SERVICE COMPANY CLEARANCE PC 09-13-2022 60 of 439 EXHIBIT TM Provide San Jose Water Service Company approval for water connection, service capability and location and layout of water lines and backflow preventers prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 47. DEDICATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS Developer shall “quit claim” to the City all rights to pump, take or otherwise extract water from the underground basin or any underground strata in the Santa Clara Valley. Documentation for quit claim shall be provided to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to final map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 48. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance or sign off of street improvement plans for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 49. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG&E, AT&T, and San Jose Water Company, and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. SECTION V: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 50. FIRE DEPT. APPARATUS ACCESS ROADWAYS Prior to issuance of final map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, all such roadways shall be minimum 20 feet in width, a minimum vertical clearance of 13' 6", maximum grade of 15%, with a minimum circulating outside radius of 42'. Cul-De-Sac diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. CFC Sec. 503. All such roadways shall be capable of supporting a maximum imposed load of 75,000 pounds and where a bridge or an elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB-17. The minimum requirements are found in the currently adopted edition of t he California Fire Code Sec. 503, as identified in the SCCFD SD&S A-1. 51. FIRE PLANS REQUIRED Where required by the Fire Code Official and shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of Building Permits, fire apparatus access roads shall be designated and PC 09-13-2022 61 of 439 EXHIBIT TM marked as a fire lane as set forth in Section 22500.1 of the California Vehicle Code and the SCCFD A-6 Standard. 52. PARKING Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate when parking is permitted on streets, in both residential/commercial applications, it shall conform to the following: A. Parking is permitted both sides of the street with street widths of 36 feet or more B. Parking is permitted on one side of the street with street widths of 28 – 35 feet C. No parking is permitted when street widths are less than 28 feet Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall clearly indicate on the plans all areas where on street parking is proposed. Include widths of the roadway, widths of the parking spaces and how any no-parking sections will be marked as shown on the plans prior to issuance of Building Permits. 53. FIRE HYDRANT SYSTEMS REQUIRED Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate that where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, onsite fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Exception: For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance with Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3, the distance requirement shall be not more than 600 feet [CFC, Section 507.5.1]. Proposed parcels are all located within 600 feet of the existing fire hydrant. 54. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW Documentation from the local water purveyor confirming the required fire flow @ 20 psi, based upon the SF of the largest proposed residence, shall be provided prior to building permit issuance. Fire flow shall be confirmed at plan review of Building Permits. SECTION VI: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 55. ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION STANDARDS PC 09-13-2022 62 of 439 EXHIBIT TM Prior to issuance of Building permits, the applicant shall comply with the additional requirements related to construction and demolition waste recycling and PCB mitigation during the building permit review phase. CITY ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF ENGINEERING/SURVEYING CONDITIONS (Section 66474.18 California Government Code) I hereby certify that the engineering and surveying conditions specified in Section IV. of this Resolution conform to generally accepted engineering practices. ___________________________ Chad Mosley, Assistant Director of Public Works City Engineer CA License 66077 PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this X day of X, XXXX by the following vote: Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: ________ Darcy Paul, Mayor City of Cupertino ________________________ Date ATTEST: ________ ________________________ Date PC 09-13-2022 63 of 439 EXHIBIT TM Kirsten Squarcia, City Clerk PC 09-13-2022 64 of 439 EXHIBIT R CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF SIX TWO STORY PERMITS TO ALLOW SIX NEW TWO-STORY HOMES WITH ATTACHED ADUS LOCATED AT 20860 MCCLELLAN ROAD (APN: 359-20-030) The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve six Two Story Permits, in substantially similar form to the Draft Resolution attached hereto as Exhibit R. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino the 13th day of September 2022, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Piu Ghosh Steven Scharf Planning Manager Planning Commission Chair PC 09-13-2022 65 of 439 EXHIBIT R RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING SIX TWO STORY PERMITS TO ALLOW SIX NEW TWO-STORY HOMES WITH ATTACHED ADUS LOCATED AT 20860 MCCLELLAN ROAD SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: R-2021-040 to R-2021-045 Applicant: District McClellan LLC, c/o Alok Damireddy Location: 20860 McClellan Road; APN#359-20-030 SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR A TWO-STORY PERMIT: WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino received applications for six Two Story Permits to allow the construction of a six new two story homes ranging from 3,385 to 4,025 square feet with an attached accessory dwelling unit ranging from 557 to 600 square feet; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 of CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive staff’s presentation and public testimony, and to consider the information contained in the Infill Exemption Memorandum along with all staff reports, other pertinent documents, and all written and oral statements received prior to and at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022 the Planning Commission recommended on a X-X vote that the City Council find the project exempt from CEQA, approve Tentative Tract Map (TM-2021-006 in substantially similar form to the Resolution presented (Resolution No. ______); and WHEREAS, all necessary public notices having been given as required by the Cupertino Municipal Code and the Government Code, and the City Council held at least one public hearing in regard to this application on October ___, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino is the decision-making body for this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the application for six Two Story Permits; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows with regard to this application: PC 09-13-2022 66 of 439 EXHIBIT R 1. The project is consistent with the Cupertino General Plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinance, and the purposes of the R-1 Ordinance; and The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as the project is within the Low Density land use area. There are no applicable specific plans that affect the project. The project has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 19.28 Single Family (R-1) Residential. 2. The granting of the permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and The granting of the permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to property improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare as the project is located within the R1-10 (Single Family Residential) zoning district, and will be compatible with the surrounding uses of the neighborhood. The project meets the building development regulations of the R-1 Ordinance and complies with the privacy protection measures to ensure that visual impacts to adjacent neighbors are mitigated. 3. The project is harmonious in scale and design with the general neighborhood; and The proposed project is located in a residential area consisting of single-family homes. The subject neighborhood contains a mix of single-story and two-story homes, making the proposed project compatible with the neighborhood. The proposed six two-story residences are comparable in size to the existing residences in the surrounding area and complies with the R-1 Ordinance regulations for floor area ratio. Additionally, the project complies with all other development regulations for R1-7.5 zoned properties regarding mass and bulk, including, but not limited to, first floor building envelope, minimum setback regulations, and building height limitations. 4. Adverse visual impacts on adjoining properties have been reasonably mitigated. Any potential adverse visual impacts on adjoining properties have been reasonably mitigated through adherence to the setback requirements and privacy protection measures of the R-1 Ordinance. The R-1 Ordinance allows property owners the ability to construct second-story windows and balconies as long as privacy protection trees and/or shrubs are planted as required by the ordinance. The project complies with the privacy screening requirements of the R-1 Ordinance by providing privacy screening plantings for the second-story balcony and second-story windows with a sill height below 5 feet along the property lines for each lot that proposes these window sizes. Per the R-1 Ordinance, the objective of privacy protection plantings is to provide substantial screening within three years of planting. Privacy PC 09-13-2022 67 of 439 EXHIBIT R protection plantings are considered Protected Trees under the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 14.18) and are recorded as such with a covenant against the property to inform current and future property owners about their protected status. Protected trees are not permitted to be removed without obtaining a tree removal permit and providing replacement plantings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 3 thereof, and those contained in all other Resolutions approved for this Project, the City Council does hereby: 1. Exercises its independent judgment and determines that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15332. Section 15332 exemption applies projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the following criteria: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the criteria stated above (Section 15332) and as discussed in the Infill Exemption Memorandum prepared for the project, will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. Approve, the application for six Two Story Permits, Application No.’s R-2021-040, - 041, -042, -043, -044, and -045. 3. Find that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based are contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no.’s R-2021-040, -041, -042, -043, -044, and -045 as set forth in the Minutes of the City Council Meeting of MONTH DAY, YEAR and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. PC 09-13-2022 68 of 439 EXHIBIT R SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on a plan set entitled “District McClellan “, consisting of one hundred and twenty-nine (129) sheets except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. In the event there are conflicts between the floor plan, cross sections and elevation drawings, the elevation drawings take precedence. 2. UNITS APPROVED A total of six single family homes with six attached Accessory Dwelling Units are approved. A covenant shall be recorded prior to final occupancy to ensure that there shall be no internal connection between the accessory dwelling unit and the principal dwelling unit throughout the lifetime of the home, nor shall the accessory dwelling unit ever be allowed to converted to be part of the principal dwelling unit. 3. PARKING REQUIREMENTS The project shall provide five on-site parking spaces and one off-site parking space for each lot. Two on-site parking spaces shall be located within an enclosed garage and three on-site parking spaces are to be open and proposed on the driveway. The one off-site parking space shall be provided along the west side of Cherryland Drive. 4. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the building plans. 5. ACCURACY OF PROJECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 6. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. PC 09-13-2022 69 of 439 EXHIBIT R 7. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. TM-2021-006 and RM-2021-015 to - 016, -022, -024 to -026 8. PRIVACY PLANTING The final privacy planting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. The variety, size, and planting distance shall be consistent with the City’s requirements. 9. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT The property owner shall record a covenant on this property to inform future property owners of the privacy protection measures and tree protection requirements consistent with the R-1 Ordinance, for all windows with views into neighboring yards and a sill height that is 5 feet or less from the second story finished floor. The precise language will be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. Proof of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to final occupancy of the residence. 10. FRONT YARD TREE The applicant shall indicate on site and landscape plans the location of a front yard tree to be located within the front yard setback area in order to screen the ma ssing of the second story. The front yard tree shall be a minimum 24-inch box and 6 feet planted height and otherwise be consistent with the City’s requirements. 11. FRONT YARD TREE COVENANT The property owner shall record a covenant on this property with the Santa Clara County Recorder’s Office that requires the retention and maintenance of the required front yard tree. The precise language will be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. Proof of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to final occupancy of the residence. 12. LANDSCAPE PROJECT SUBMITTAL Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a full Landscape Documentation Package, per sections 14.15.050 A, B, C, and D of the Landscape Ordinance, for projects with landscape area 500 square feet or more or elect to submit a Prescriptive Compliance Application per sections 14.15.040 A, B, and C for projects with landscape area between 500 square feet and 2,500 square feet. The Landscape Documentation Package or Prescriptive Compliance Application shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits, and additional requirements per sections 14.15.040 D, E, PC 09-13-2022 70 of 439 EXHIBIT R F, and G or 14.15.050 E, F, G, H, and I will be required to be reviewed and approved prior to final inspections. 13. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/TREATMENTS The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color, materials, architectural treatments, doors, windows, lighting fixtures, and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits to ensure quality and consistency. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall either require a modification to this permit or a new permit based on the extent of the change. 14. DUST CONTROL The following construction practices shall be implemented during all p hases of construction for the proposed project to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site: a. Water all exposed surfaces areas (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) at least twice daily and more often during windy periods to prevent visible dust from leaving the site; active areas adjacent to windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. b. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off -site shall be covered. c. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. d. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. e. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. f. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to 5 minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. g. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturer’s specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified mechanic and determined to be running in proper condition prior to operation. PC 09-13-2022 71 of 439 EXHIBIT R h. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the Lead Agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. The applicant shall incorporate the City’s construction best management practices into the building permit plan set prior to any grading, excavation, foundation or building permit issuance. 15. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND NOISE LIMITS a. All grading activities shall be limited to the dry season (April 15 to October 1), unless permitted otherwise by the Director of Public works. b. Construction hours and noise limits shall be compliant with all requirements of Chapter 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. c. Grading, street construction, underground utility and demolition hours for work done more than 750 feet away from residential areas shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Grading, street construction, demolition or underground utility work within 750 feet of residential areas shall not occur on Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, and during the nighttime period as defined in Section 10.48.053(b) of the Municipal Code. d. Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays as defined in Chapter 10.48 of the Municipal Code. Night time construction is allowed if compliant with nighttime standards of Section 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. e. Rules and regulations pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of an applicant appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. f. The applicant shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. The applicant shall comply with the above grading and construction hours and noise limit requirements unless otherwise indicated. 16. DEMOLITION REQUIREMENTS All demolished building and site materials shall be recycled to the maximum extent feasible subject to the Building Official. The applicant shall provide evidence that materials were recycled prior to issuance of final demolition permits. 17. DARK SKY ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE PC 09-13-2022 72 of 439 EXHIBIT R The applicant shall comply with Dark Sky Ordinance regulations, as applicable, prior to issuance of the building permit. 18. BIRD SAFE ORDINANCE COMPLIANCE The applicant shall comply with the Bird Safe Ordinance regulations, as applicable, prior to issuance of the building permit. 19. NESTING BIRDS Nests of raptors and other birds shall be protected when in active use, as required by the federal Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the California Department of Fish and Game Code. a. Construction and tree removal/pruning activities shall be scheduled to avoid the nesting season to the extent feasible. If feasible, tree removal and/or pruning shall be completed before the start of the nesting season to help preclude nesting. The nesting season for most birds and raptors in the San Fra ncisco Bay area extends from February 1 through August 31. Preconstruction surveys (described below) are not required for tree removal or construction activities outside the nesting period. If construction activities and any required tree removal occur during the nesting season (February 1 and August 31), a qualified ornithologist shall be required to conduct surveys prior to tree removal or construction activities. Preconstruction surveys shall be conducted no more than 14 days prior to the start of tree removal, pruning or construction. Preconstruction surveys shall be repeated at 14-day intervals until construction has been initiated in the area after which surveys can be stopped. During this survey, the ornithologist shall inspect all trees and other possible nesting habitats in and immediately adjacent to the construction areas for nests. b. If the survey does not identify any nesting birds that would be affected by construction activities, no further mitigation is required. If an active nest containing viable eggs or young birds is found sufficiently close to work areas to be disturbed by these activities, their locations shall be documented and protective measures implemented under the direction of the qualified ornithologist until the nests no longer contain eggs or young birds. c. Protective measures shall include establishment of clearly delineated exclusion zones (i.e. demarcated by identifiable fencing, such as orange construction fencing or equivalent) around each nest location as determined by the qualified ornithologist, taking into account the species of birds nesting, their tolerance for disturbance and proximity to existing development. In general, exclusion zones shall be a minimum of 300 feet for raptors and 75 feet for passerines and other birds. The active nest within an exclusion zone shall be monitored on a weekly basis throughout the nesting season to identify signs of disturbance and confirm PC 09-13-2022 73 of 439 EXHIBIT R nesting status. The radius of an exclusion zone may be increased by the qualified biologist, if project activities are determined to be adversely affecting the nesting birds. Exclusion zones may be reduced by the qualified biologist only in consultation with California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The protection measures and buffers shall remain in effect until the young have left the nest and are foraging independently or the nest is no longer active. d. A final report on nesting birds and raptors, including survey methodology, survey date(s), map of identified active nests (if any), and protection meas ures (if required), shall be submitted to the Planning Manager, through the building permit review process, and be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director prior to the start of grading. 20. GEOLOGY AND SOILS All grading and foundation plans for the proposed project shall be designed by a Civil and Structural Engineer, peer-reviewed by a third-party qualified Geotechnical Engineer, paid for by the applicant, and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, and Chief Building Official, prior to issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever comes first, to ensure that all geotechnical recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed project by GeoEngineering Consultants are properly incorporated and utilized in the project design. 21. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PHASE II RECOMMENDATIONS Prior to initiation of demolition or construction activities, the project applicant shall comply with all applicable recommendations within the Limited Phase II ESA prepared for the proposed project by ReDevelop Inc. including the excavation and proper disposal of OCP impacted soils, the development of a Health and Safety Plan to protect workers during grading and construction activities, and the installation of vapor barrier protection for residences. OCP-impacted soils located within the project site shall be removed to a depth of one foot and off-hauled by a licensed hazardous waste contractor (Class A) and contractor personnel that have completed 40 -hour OSHA hazardous training. The soil shall be disposed of appropriately in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations associated with hazardous waste. That the applicant has complied with the recommendations shall be verified by the City of Cupertino Community Development Department and the Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department through their Voluntary Cleanup Program, prior to the issuance of the first grading and/or building permit. 22. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASBESTOS AND/OR LEAD ASSESSOR CONSULTATION PC 09-13-2022 74 of 439 EXHIBIT R Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to complete and submit for review to the Building Department an asbestos and lead survey. If asbestos containing materials or lead-containing materials are not discovered during the survey, further mitigation related to asbestos-containing materials or lead containing materials shall not be required. If asbestos containing mat erials and/or lead- containing materials are discovered by the survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestos-containing materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with current California Occupational Health and Safety (Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal of the on-site structures. The plan shall include the requirement that work shall be conducted by a Cal-OSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529 and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and lead training, engineering controls, and certifications. The applicant shall submit the work plan to the City of Cupertino for review and approval. The City has the right to defer the work plan to the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health for additional review. Materials containing more than one (1) percent asbestos that is friable are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one (1) percent friable asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD Section 11-2-303. 23. NOISE AND VIBRATION NOTICE AND SIGNAGE REQUIREMENTS a. At least 10 days prior to the start of any demolition, ground disturbing, or construction activities, the project applicant shall send notices of the planned activity by first class mail as follows: i. For projects on sites that are more than 0.5 acres or four or more residential units the notices shall be sent to off-site businesses and residents within 500 feet of the project site; ii. For projects on sites between 0.25 to 0.5 acres, or two or three residential units (not including Accessory Dwelling Units) notices shall be sent to of f- site businesses and residents within 250 feet of the project site; or iii. For projects on sites less than 0.25 acres or one residential unit, the notices shall be sent to off-site businesses and residents within 100 feet of the project site. The notification shall include a brief description of the project, the activities that would occur, the hours when activity would occur, and the construction period’s overall duration. The notification should include the telephone numbers of the contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event PC 09-13-2022 75 of 439 EXHIBIT R of a noise or vibration complaint. The project applicant shall provide the City with evidence of mailing of the notice, upon request. b. At least 10 days prior to the start of construction activities, a sign shall be posted at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, which includes permitted construction days and hours, as well as the telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, they shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the action to the City within three business days of receiving the complaint. 24. NOISE MANAGEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION Projects shall implement the following measures to reduce noise during construction and demolition activity: a. The project applicant and contractors shall prepare and submit a Construction Noise Control Plan to the City’s Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the first permit during the Building Permit stage. The Construction Noise Plan shall demonstrate compliance with daytime and nighttime decibel limits pursuant to Chapter 10.48 (Community Noise Control) of Cupertino Municipal Code. The details of the Construction Noise Control Plan shall be included in the applicable construction documents and implemented by the on-site Construction Manager. Noise reduction measures selected and implemented shall be based on the type of construction equipment used on the site, distance of construction activities from sensitive receptor(s), site terrain, and other features on and surrounding the site (e.g., trees, built environment) and may include, but not be limited to, temporary construction noise attenuation walls, high quality mufflers. During the entire active construction period, the Construction Noise Control Plan shall demonstrate that compliance with the specified noise control requirements for construction equipment and tools will reduce construction noise in compliance with the City’s daytime and nighttime decibel limits. b. Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas and submit to the City of Cupertino Public Works Department for approval prior to the start of the construction phase. c. Signs will be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of PC 09-13-2022 76 of 439 EXHIBIT R unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment will be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells will be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager will use smart back -up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and law. 25. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City’s choice, and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the “indemnified parties”) from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action, suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as “proceeding”) brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant related to any Ordinance, Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilit ies, and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such attorneys’ fees and costs shall include amounts paid to the City’s outside counsel and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs awards, including attorneys’ fees awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against the indemnified parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a Reimbursement Agreement to govern any such reimbursement. The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City for all costs incurred in additional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting, revising, or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report, PC 09-13-2022 77 of 439 EXHIBIT R negative declaration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by proceedings challenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project. The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages. 26. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 27. CHERRYLAND HOA The existing Cherryland CC&Rs acknowledges the granting of a reciprocal easement of the private road for a future development of the western lot. Prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, the developer/ applicant shall establish an agreement with the Cherryland HOA for ingress/egress and for maintenance that covers the fully widened private roadway Cherryland Drive. The agreement should consider how the private Cherryland Drive would be assessed for tax purposes to the adjacent property owners if the private drive were to be merged into one parcel. 28. LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall work with the Cherryland HOA to obtain consensus for, and to prepare, a lot line adjustment to create one parcel for the fully widened private Cherryland Drive. Developer/applicant shall submit the necessary documentation and fees to the Public Works Department for review and approval during building permit phase. The lot line adjustment would be executed after recordation of the Cherryland HOA Agreement and Final Map recordation. 29. STREET IMPROVEMENTS & DEDICATION Roadway dedication in fee title and frontage improvements along McClellan Road will be required to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Street improvement plans and grading and drainage plans must be completed and approved prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. PC 09-13-2022 78 of 439 EXHIBIT R Street improvements may include, but not be limited to, removal of existing driveways, new curb and gutter, new ADA ramp, storm drain system modifications, street tree installations, and joint pole relocation. All improvements must be completed and accepted by the City prior to Building Final Occupancy or Street Improvement Encroachment Permit acceptance whichever comes first. Additional comments will be provided during review of the plans and shall be incorporated prior to Final Map approval as reviewed by the Public Works Department. 30. ACCEPTANCE OF PROPERTY RIGHTS The Public Works Director, or his/her designee, shall have the authority to accept all offers of dedications, easements, quitclaims and other property rights and interests on behalf of the City. 31. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the Director of Public Works. All improvements must be completed and accepted by the City prior to Building Final Occupancy or Street Improvement Encroachment Permit acceptance whichever comes first. 32. PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE IMPROVEMENTS Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer shall provide/demonstrate the location of pedestrian and bicycle related improvements including, but not limited to, modifications to the raised island along McClellan Road due to the existing driveway removals and to meet trash collection requirements, consistent with the Cupertino Bicycle Transportation Plan and the Pedestrian Transportation Plan, and as approved by the Director of Public Works. All improvements must be completed and accepted by the City prior to Building Final Occupancy or Street Improvement Encroachment Permit acceptance whichever comes first. 33. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate on the plans that lighting fixtures are be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. Street lighting shall be installed and shall be approved by the Director of Public Works prior to Building Final Occupancy. PC 09-13-2022 79 of 439 EXHIBIT R 34. GRADING Prior to issuance of Building or Grading Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate that grading is in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works. 401 Certifications and 404 permits may also be required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 35. DRAINAGE Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate drainage designs and proposals to be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and satisfy any requirements from the environmental analysis. Hydrology and pre- and post-development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include, but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff from the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g., via buried pipes, retention systems or other approved systems and improvements) as necessary to avoid an increase of the ten percent flood water surface elevation to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. Any storm water overflows or surface sheeting should be directed away from neighboring private properties and to the public right of way as much as reasonably possible. All storm drain inlets shall be clearly marked with the words “No Dumping – Flows to Creek” using permanently affixed metal medallions or equivalent, as approved by the Environmental Programs Division. Additional comments will be provided and shall be incorporated prior to Final Map approval. 36. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer/applicant shall submit plans to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department that verify a minimum reservation of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures, for storm water treatment, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, as reviewed and approved by the Director of Public Works prior to issuance of Building Permits. PC 09-13-2022 80 of 439 EXHIBIT R The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan and a Storm Water Facilities Operation, Maintenance and Easement Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 37. SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT The project developer/applicant shall enter into a subdivision agreement with the City of Cupertino providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement and fees shall be executed and paid prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. Fees: a. Checking & Inspection Fees: Per current fee schedule ($4,947 or 5% of improvement costs) b. Grading Permit: Per current fee schedule ($3,683 or 6% of improvement costs) c. Tract Map Fee: Per current fee schedule ($12,306) d. Storm Drainage Fee: Per current fee schedule ($4,250 per AC + $322 per unit) e. Transportation Impact Fee: Per current fee schedule ($6,797 per unit) f. Encroachment Permit Fee: Per current fee schedule ($3,304) g. Park Fees: Per current fee schedule ($105,000 per unit) h. Storm Management Plan Fee Per current fee schedule ($1,670) i. Street Tree Fee: By Developer or Per current fee schedule: $481 per tree Bonds: a. Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements b. Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement c. On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said PC 09-13-2022 81 of 439 EXHIBIT R change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 38. FINAL MAP A final map will be subject to City Council approval and shall be recorded prior to issuance of building permits. Existing buildings must be demolished prior to recordation of the final map as building(s) cannot straddle between lot lines and will be reviewed and approved by the Public Work s department prior to recordation of final map. 39. TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEES The Project is subject to the payment of Transportation Impact Fees under City’s Transportation Impact Fee Program (Chapter 14.02 of the Cupertino Municipal Code) and payment shall be provided prior to issuance of Building Permits. 40. PARKS The residential units are subject to the payment of parkland fees in -lieu of parkland dedication per Chapter 13.08 and Chapter 18.24 of the Cupertino Municipal Code and payment shall be provided prior to issuance of Building Permits. 41. SURVEYS Prior to issuance of Building Permits, Boundary Survey and a horizontal control plan will be required for all new construction to ensure the proposed building will be set based on the boundary survey and setback requirements. 42. TRASH, RECYCLING AND COMPOST ENCLOSURES Trash enclosure plans must be designed in accordance with the City’s “Public Works Guidelines posted at www.cupertino.org/nowaste, and to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is required prior to issuance of a building permit. (CMC 9.18.210 H & K) If the project requires trash collection along Cherryland Drive, the applicant and the adjacent Cherryland HOA shall enter into an agreement with the City prior to Final Map approval that indemnifies and holds harmless both the City and the refuse and recycling collection company (Recology) from and against any harm, damage or maintenance that may occur or become necessary to onsite paving stone driveway surfaces. 43. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT PC 09-13-2022 82 of 439 EXHIBIT R Developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non- standard appurtenances in the public road right-of-way that may include, but is not limited to, landscaping, street trees, sidewalk, pavers, and streetlights. 44. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES Developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. Developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions to be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of Building Permits. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the Director of Public Works. 45. TRANSFORMERS & CABINETS Electrical transformers, telephone cabinets and similar equipment shall be placed in underground vaults. The developer must receive written approval from both the Public Works Department and the Community Development Department prior to installation of any above ground equipment and prior to issuance of Building Permits. Should above ground equipment be permitted by the City, equipment and enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas, as determined by the Community Development Department. Transformers shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 46. WATER BACKFLOW PREVENTERS Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the Domestic and Fire Water Backflow preventers and similar above ground equipment shall be placed away from the public right of way and site driveways to a location approved by the Cupertino Planning Department, Santa Clara County Fire Department and the water company. 47. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. 48. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT When and where it is required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the SWRCB, which PC 09-13-2022 83 of 439 EXHIBIT R encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. Provide documentation to be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, prior to issuance of Buildings Permits. 49. EROSION CONTROL PLAN Developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer prior to issuance of Building, Demolition, or Grading Permits. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 50. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project . 51. TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN The developer must submit a traffic control plan by a Registered Traffic Engineer to be approved by the City prior to issuance of Building Permits. The plan shall include a temporary traffic control plan for work in the right of way as well as a routing plan for all vehicles used during construction. All traffic control signs must be reviewed and approved by the City prior to commencement of work. The City has adopted Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) standards for all signage and striping work throughout the City. 52. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. Street tree locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department prior to issuance of Building Permits. 53. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City prior to issuance of Buildings Permits. 54. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. Clearance should include written approval of the location of any proposed Fire Backflow Preventers, Fire Department Connections and Fire Hydrants (typically Backflow Preventers should be located on PC 09-13-2022 84 of 439 EXHIBIT R private property adjacent to the public right of way, and fire department connections must be located within 100’ of a Fire Hydrant). 55. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed and shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of Building Permits. 56. SAN JOSE WATER SERVICE COMPANY CLEARANCE Provide San Jose Water Service Company approval for water c onnection, service capability and location and layout of water lines and backflow preventers prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 57. DEDICATION OF UNDERGROUND WATER RIGHTS Developer shall “quit claim” to the City all rights to pump, take or otherwise extract water from the underground basin or any underground strata in the Santa Clara Valley. Documentation for quit claim shall be provided to the Public Works Department for review and approval prior to final map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 58. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance or sign off of street improvement plans for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. 59. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG&E, AT&T, and San Jose Water Company, and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to Final Map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department. SECTION V: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT 60. FIRE DEPT. APPARATUS ACCESS ROADWAYS Prior to issuance of final map approval as reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, all such roadways shall be minimum 20 feet in width, a minimum vertical clearance of 13' 6", maximum grade of 15%, with a minimum circulating outside radius of 42'. Cul-De-Sac diameters shall be no less than 72 feet. CFC Sec. 503. All such roadways shall be capable of supporting a maximum imposed load of 75,000 PC 09-13-2022 85 of 439 EXHIBIT R pounds and where a bridge or an elevated surface is part of a fire apparatus access road, the bridge shall be constructed and maintained in accordance with AASHTO HB-17. The minimum requirements are found in the currently adopted edition of the California Fire Code Sec. 503, as identified in the SCCFD SD&S A-1. 61. FIRE PLANES REQUIRED Where required by the Fire Code Official and shall be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of Building Permits, fire apparatus access roads shall be designated and marked as a fire lane as set forth in Section 22500.1 of the California Vehicle Code and the SCCFD A-6 Standard. 62. PARKING Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate when parking is permitted on streets, in both residential/commercial applications, it shall conform to the following: A. Parking is permitted both sides of the street with street widths of 36 feet or more B. Parking is permitted on one side of the street with street widths of 28 – 35 feet C. No parking is permitted when street widths are less than 28 feet Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant shall clearly indicate on the plans all areas where on street parking is proposed. Include widths of the roadway, widths of the parking spaces and how any no-parking sections will be marked as shown on the plans prior to issuance of Building Permits. 63. FIRE HYDRANT SYSTEMS REQUIRED Prior to issuance of Building Permits, the developer/applicant shall demonstrate that where a portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus access road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, onsite fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. Exception: For Group R-3 and Group U occupancies, equipped throughout with an approved automatic sprinkler system installed in accordance w ith Section 903.3.1.1, 903.3.1.2 or 903.3.1.3, the distance requirement shall be not more than 600 feet [CFC, Section 507.5.1]. Proposed parcels are all located within 600 feet of the existing fire hydrant. 64. REQUIRED FIRE FLOW Documentation from the local water purveyor confirming the required fire flow @ 20 psi, based upon the SF of the largest proposed residence, shall be provided prior to PC 09-13-2022 86 of 439 EXHIBIT R building permit issuance. Fire flow shall be confirmed at plan review of Building Permits. SECTION VI: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION 65. ENVIRONMENTAL DIVISION STANDARDS Prior to issuance of Building permits, the applicant shall comply with the additional requirements related to construction and demolition waste recycling and PCB mitigation during the building permit review phase. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this DAY, MONTH YEAR by the following vote: Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: SIGNED: ________ Darcy Paul, Mayor City of Cupertino ________________________ Date ATTEST: ________ Kirsten Squarcia, City Clerk ________________________ Date PC 09-13-2022 87 of 439 EXHIBIT RM CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 DRAFT RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL SIX MINOR RESIDENTIAL PERMIT TO ALLOW A SIX NEW SECOND-STORY BALCONIES LOCATED AT 20860 MCCLELLAN ROAD The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve six Minor Residential Permits, in substantially similar form to the Draft Resolution attached hereto as Exhibit RM. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino the 13th day of September 2022, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: Piu Ghosh Steven Scharf Planning Manager Planning Commission Chair PC 09-13-2022 88 of 439 EXHIBIT RM RESOLUTION NO. ________ A RESOLUTION OF THE CUPERTINO CITY COUNCIL APPROVING SIX MINOR RESIDENTIAL PERMITS TO ALLOW SIX NEW SECOND-STORY BALCONIES LOCATED AT 20860 MCCLELLAN ROAD SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: RM-2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026 Applicant: District McClellan LLC, c/o Alok Damireddy Location: 20860 McClellan Road; APN#359-20-030 SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR A MINOR RESIDENTIAL PERMIT: WHEREAS, the City of Cupertino received applications for six Minor Residential Permits to allow six second story balconies; and WHEREAS, the project is determined to be categorically exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15332 of CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to receive staff’s presentation and public testimony, and to consider the information contained in the Infill Exemption Memorandum along with all staff reports, other pertinent documents, and all written and oral statements received prior to and at the public hearing; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2022 the Planning Commission recommended on a X -X vote that the City Council find the project exempt from CEQA, approve Tentative Tract Map (TM-2021-006 in substantially similar form to the Resolution presented (Resolution No. ______) and approve six Two Story Permits (R-2021-040 to R-2021-045) in substantially similar form to the Resolution presented (Resolution No. _____); and WHEREAS, all necessary public notices having been given as required by the Cupertino Municipal Code and the Government Code, and the City Council held at least one public hearing in regard to this application on October ___, 2022; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Cupertino is the decision-making body for this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support the application for six Minor Residential Permits; and PC 09-13-2022 89 of 439 EXHIBIT RM WHEREAS, the City Council finds as follows with regard to this application: 1. The project is consistent with the Cupertino General Plan, any applicable specific plans, zoning ordinance, and the purposes of the R-1 Ordinance; and The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan as the project is within the Low Density land use area. There are no applicable specific plans that affect the project. The project has been found to be consistent with the requirements of Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 19.28 Single Family (R-1) Residential. 2. The granting of the permit will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare; and The granting of the permits will not result in a condition that is detrimental or injurious to property improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare as the project is located within the R1-7.5 (Single Family Residential) zoning district, and will be compatible with the surrounding uses of the neighborhood. The project meets the building development regulations of the R-1 Ordinance and complies with the privacy protection measures to ensure that visual impacts to adjacent neighbors are mitigated. 3. The project is harmonious in scale and design with the general neighborhood; and The proposed project is located in a residential area consisting of single-family homes. The subject neighborhood contains a mix of single-story and two-story homes, making the proposed project compatible with the neighborhood. The project complies with all other development regulations for R1-7.5 zoned properties, including, but not limited to, minimum setback regulations. 4. Adverse visual impacts on adjoining properties have been reasonably mitigated. Any potential adverse visual impacts on adjoining properties have been reasonably mitigated through adherence to the setback requirements and privacy protection measures of the R-1 Ordinance. The proposed balconies for the project comply with the setback requirements for the R1-7.5 zoning district. The R-1 Ordinance allows property owners the ability to construct second-story balconies as long as privacy protection trees and/or shrubs are planted as required by the ordinance. The project complies with the privacy screening requirements of the R-1 Ordinance by providing privacy screening plantings for the second-story balcony along the rear (eastern) property line and signed privacy waivers for the right (southern) and left (northern) property lines. Per the R-1 Ordinance, the objective of privacy protection plantings is to provide substantial screening within three years of planting. Privacy protection plantings are considered PC 09-13-2022 90 of 439 EXHIBIT RM Protected Trees under the City’s Municipal Code (Chapter 14.18) and are recorded as such with a covenant against the property to inform current and future property owners about their protected status. Protected trees are not permitted to be removed without obtaining a tree removal permit and providing replacement plantings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 3 thereof, and those contained in all other Resolutions approved for this Project, the City Council does hereby: 1. Exercises its independent judgment and determines that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section 15332. Section 15332 exemption applies projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the following criteria: a. The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. b. The proposed development occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. c. The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. d. Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. e. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with the criteria stated above (Section 15332) and as discussed in the Infill Exemption Memorandum prepared for the project, will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. Approve, the application for six Minor Residential Permits, Application No.’s RM- 2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026, and 3. Find that the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this Resolution are based are contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no.’s RM-2022-015, -016, -022, -024, -025, -026 as set forth in the Minutes of the City Council Meeting of MONTH DAY, YEAR and are incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on a plan set entitled “District McClellan “, consisting of PC 09-13-2022 91 of 439 EXHIBIT RM one hundred and twenty nine (129) sheets except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. In the event there are conflicts between the floor plan, cross sections and elevation drawings, the elevation drawings take precedence. 2. BALCONIES APPROVED A total of six balconies, one for each residential unit within the proposed development is approved as indicated in the attached plan set. The size and location of the balconies shall not be changed without review and approval of the City with permits as needed. A reduction in the size of the balcony is permitted. 3. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the building plans. 4. ACCURACY OF PROJECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 5. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 6. CONCURRENT APPROVAL CONDITIONS The conditions of approval contained in file no. TM-2021-006 and R-2021-040 to R- 2021-045. 7. PRIVACY PLANTING The final privacy planting plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division prior to issuance of building permits. The variety, size, and planting distance shall be consistent with the City’s requirements. 8. PRIVACY PROTECTION COVENANT The property owner shall record a covenant on this property to inform future property owners of the privacy protection measures and tree protection requirements consistent with the R-1 Ordinance, for all windows with views into neighboring yards and a sill height that is 5 feet or less from the second story finished floor. The precise PC 09-13-2022 92 of 439 EXHIBIT RM language will be subject to approval by the Director of Community Development. Proof of recordation must be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to final occupancy of the residence. 9. EXTERIOR BUILDING MATERIALS/TREATMENTS The final building exterior plan shall closely resemble the details shown on the original approved plans. Final building exterior treatment plan (including but not limited to details on exterior color, materials, architectural treatments, doors, windows, lighting fixtures, and/or embellishments) shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits to ensure quality and consistency. Any exterior changes determined to be substantial by the Director of Community Development shall either require a modification to this permit or a new permit based on the extent of the change. 10. GEOLOGY AND SOILS All grading and foundation plans for the proposed project shall be designed by a Civil and Structural Engineer, peer-reviewed by a third-party qualified Geotechnical Engineer, paid for by the applicant, and reviewed and approved by the City Engineer, and Chief Building Official, prior to issuance of building permit or grading permit, whichever comes first, to ensure that all geotechnical recommendations specified in the Geotechnical Investigation prepared for the proposed project by GeoEngineering Consultants are properly incorporated and utilized in the project design. 11. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS PHASE II RECOMMENDATIONS Prior to initiation of demolition or construction activities, the pro ject applicant shall comply with all applicable recommendations within the Limited Phase II ESA prepared for the proposed project by ReDevelop Inc. including the excavation and proper disposal of OCP impacted soils, the development of a Health and Safety Plan to protect workers during grading and construction activities, and the installation of vapor barrier protection for residences. OCP-impacted soils located within the project site shall be removed to a depth of one foot and off-hauled by a licensed hazardous waste contractor (Class A) and contractor personnel that have completed 40-hour OSHA hazardous training. The soil shall be disposed of appropriately in accordance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations associated with hazardous waste. That the applicant has complied with the recommendations shall be verified by the City of Cupertino Community Development Department and the Santa Clara County Environmental Health Department through their Voluntary Cleanup Program, prior to the issuance o f the first grading and/or building permit. PC 09-13-2022 93 of 439 EXHIBIT RM 12. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ASBESTOS AND/OR LEAD ASSESSOR CONSULTATION Prior to issuance of a demolition permit for on-site structures, the project applicant shall consult with certified Asbestos and/or Lead Risk Assessors to complete and submit for review to the Building Department an asbestos and lead survey. If asbestos containing materials or lead-containing materials are not discovered during the survey, further mitigation related to asbestos-containing materials or lead containing materials shall not be required. If asbestos containing materials and/or lead-containing materials are discovered by the survey, the project applicant shall prepare a work plan to demonstrate how the on-site asbestos- containing materials and/or lead-containing materials shall be removed in accordance with current California Occupational Health and Safety (Cal-OSHA) Administration regulations and disposed of in accordance with all CalEPA regulations, prior to the demolition and/or removal of the on-site structures. The plan shall include the requirement that work shall be conducted by a Cal -OSHA registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance with Title 8 CCR 1529 and Title 8 CCR 1532.1 regarding asbestos and lead training, engineering controls, and certifications. The applicant shall submit the work plan to the City of Cupertino for review and approval. The City has the right to defer the work plan to the Santa Clara County Department of Environmental Health for additional review. Materials containing more than one (1) percent asbestos that is friable are also subject to BAAQMD regulations. Removal of materials containing more than one (1) percent friable asbestos shall be completed in accordance with BAAQMD Section 11-2-303. 13. IDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City’s choice, and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the “indemnified parties”) from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action, suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as “proceeding”) brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant related to any Ordinance, Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether PC 09-13-2022 94 of 439 EXHIBIT RM incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such attorneys’ fees and costs shall include amounts paid to the City’s outside counsel and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs awards, including attorneys’ fees awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against the indemnified parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a Reimbursement Agreement to govern any such reimbursement. The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimb urse the City for all costs incurred in additional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting, revising, or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report, negative declaration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by proceedings challenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project. The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages. 14. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Cupertino this X day of X, XXXX by the following vote: Members of the City Council AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PC 09-13-2022 95 of 439 EXHIBIT RM SIGNED: ________ Darcy Paul, Mayor City of Cupertino ________________________ Date ATTEST: ________ Kirsten Squarcia, City Clerk ________________________ Date PC 09-13-2022 96 of 439 City of Cupertino Community Development Department 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum September 2022 Prepared by 1501 Sports Drive, Suite A, Sacramento, CA 95834 PC 09-13-2022 97 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 1 September 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS A. Introduction and Summary ............................................................................................... 2 B. Project Description .......................................................................................................... 2 C. Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 6 D. Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 21 FIGURES Figure 1 Regional Project Location ............................................................................................ 3 Figure 2 Project Site Boundaries Map ........................................................................................ 4 TABLES Table 1 Proposed Lot and Residence Sizes ............................................................................... 5 Table 2 Construction Equipment Noise .....................................................................................12 Table 3 BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance ...........................................................................13 Table 4 Maximum Unmitigated Construction Emissions (lbs/day) .............................................14 Table 5 Maximum Unmitigated Operational Emissions .............................................................16 APPENDICES Appendix A: Arborist Report Appendix B: Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Modeling Results Appendix C: Preliminary Stormwater Analysis PC 09-13-2022 98 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 2 September 2022 A. INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY On October 20, 2015, the City of Cupertino adopted an amended General Plan 1 and certified an associated Environmental Impact Report (EIR).2 The General Plan EIR is a program EIR, prepared pursuant to Section 15168 of the CEQA Guidelines (Title 14, California Code of Regulations, Sections 15000 et seq.). The General Plan EIR analyzed full implementation of the General Plan and identified measures to mitigate the significant adverse impacts associated with buildout of the General Plan. Section 21084 of the Public Resources Code requires the CEQA Guidelines to include a list of classes of projects which have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment and which shall, therefore, be exempt from the provisions of CEQA. In response to that mandate, the Secretary of the Natural Resources Agency has found that several classes of projects listed in Article 19 do not have a significant effect on the environment and, thus, are declared to be categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents. The purpose of this Memorandum is to evaluate the 20860 McClellan Road Project (proposed project) to determine whether the proposed project is exempt from review under CEQA. As will be demonstrated below, the proposed project can be considered exempt from CEQA, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, In-Fill Development Projects. In addition, none of the exceptions to categorical exemptions specified by CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 are applicable to the proposed project. B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The following provides a description of the project site’s current location and setting, as well as the proposed project components and the discretionary actions required for the project. Project Location and Setting The approximately 1.25-acre project site (APN 359-20-030) is located at 20860 McClellan Road in the City of Cupertino, California (see Figure 1). The project site is currently developed with a single- family residence, garage, and accessory structure in the northern portion of the site, as well as a barn and truck yard in the southern portion of the site, which are used as rental storage space for automobiles and boats. The barn is constructed of wood with a bare dirt floor and has an attached workshop to the north with a concrete foundation. The workshop is used by the current on-site tenant for private vehicle maintenance. In addition, various piles of debris are located throughout the site, including a pile of debris that contains discarded gas cans, paint, and spray paint cans in the northeast corner of the site. The site was historically used as a fruit orchard in the 1940s to early 1960s. A total of 21 trees remain scattered throughout the site. The project site is bound by McClellan Road to the north and Cherryland Drive to the east. Surrounding existing uses include single-family residences to the north, across McClellan Road, east, across Cherryland Drive, and south; and two churches and an adult day services center to the west. De Anza College is located approximately 0.25-mile northwest of the project site (see Figure 2). The site is located approximately 0.4-mile from State Route (SR) 85, and approximately 1.3-miles south of SR 280. The Cupertino General Plan designates the site as Low Density Residential (1-5 dwelling units per acre [du/ac]) and the site is zoned Single-Family Residential with a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet (sf) (R1-10). 1 City of Cupertino. General Plan: Community Vision 2015 – 2040. Adopted October 20, 2015. 2 City of Cupertino. General Plan Amendment, Housing Element Update, and Associated Rezoning Draft EIR. June 18, 2014. PC 09-13-2022 99 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 3 September 2022 Figure 1 Regional Project Location Project Location PC 09-13-2022 100 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 4 September 2022 Figure 2 Project Site Boundaries Map De Anza College Single-Family Residences Single-Family Residences Single-Family Residences New Life Church Live Oak Adult Day Services St. Jude’s Episcopal Church PC 09-13-2022 101 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 5 September 2022 Project Components The proposed project would include demolition of all existing buildings and removal of a number of on-site unprotected trees as reviewed in the Arborist Report (see Appendix A) to allow for the development of six residences on lots ranging from 7,526 sf to 9,615 sf. Each residential lot would include a two-story single-family residence ranging in size between 2,970 sf and 3,610 sf of living space, a two-car garage, and one accessory dwelling unit (ADU) ranging between 557 sf and 600 sf. Table 1 provides a more detailed breakdown of the proposed on-site development. Table 1 Proposed Lot and Residence Sizes Lot Lot Size (sf) Residence Size (sf) ADU Size (sf) Garage Size (sf) Floor Area Ratio (FAR) (%) Lot Coverage (%) 1 8,581 3,304 563 415 43% 29.5% 2 7,535 2,970 600 415 44.9% 29.9% 3 7,532 2,970 600 415 44.9% 29.9% 4 7,526 2,970 600 415 45% 30% 5 8,469 3,330 557 415 43.3% 30% 6 9,615 3,610 560 415 42% 31% Each residence would include a two-car garage, and three off-street uncovered driveway spaces. In addition, six off-site, guest parking spaces will be available on Cherryland Drive, for a total of 36 parking spaces to be developed as part of the proposed project. Access to each of the proposed residential lots would be provided by 20-foot wide, full-access driveways located along Cherryland Drive, which would connect each proposed garage to the roadway. The proposed project would include roadway improvements, such as the widening of Cherryland Drive by 14.5 feet to allow for curb, gutter, sidewalk and parking along the western portion of Cherryland Drive and to facilitate two-lane travel and an emergency fire truck turnaround along the fully-widened private road. Each lot would include between 2,538 sf and 3,653 sf of landscaped areas. Landscaping would include, but not be limited to, trees, shrubs, ground cover, and lawn areas. Furthermore, the landscaping plan includes a privacy protection planting plan as required to comply with Cupertino Municipal Code Section 19.28.120, Landscape Requirements. The privacy protection plan provides screening shrubs to be installed along the property lines based on the 30-degree cone of vision from the window jamb, of the proposed residences viewsheds, as defined in the Municipal Code, in order to mitigate privacy impacts to adjacent neighbors. All landscaping improvements would be consistent with Chapter 14.15, Landscape Ordinance, of the City’s Municipal Code and would be irrigated by an automatic irrigation system. The project will include a landscape documentation package to be submitted for review and approval by the Planning Division prior to building permit issuance and the project is conditioned to comply with the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance requirements pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code Chapter 14.15. The proposed project would remove up to 17 unprotected trees of the 21 trees as reviewed in the Arborist Report prepared by Advanced Tree Care (see Appendix A) that currently exist on-site, eight of which are currently unhealthy or dead. However, 13 trees would be planted within the project site to replace the trees proposed to be removed. The proposed tree removal does not include the removal of protected trees pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code Section 14.18.050; therefore, a tree removal permit is not required for the proposed project. PC 09-13-2022 102 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 6 September 2022 Stormwater runoff within the project site would flow to a series of bioretention basins located in the landscaped areas of the project site. Each individual lot would have its own independent bioretention basin. Roof and yard drainage would filter through landscaped areas to provide storm water pre-treatment before being directed into the basins. The bioretention basins would have a maximum ponding depth of 9 inches, with 24-inch soil media backfill placed over 18-inch drain rock bed. The project would also include permeable pavement for the proposed driveways and roadway to further reduce impervious surfaces and promote stormwater infiltration. A series of new pipes, including a 24-inch detention pipe, would collect and detain the on-site stormwater and convey any overflow water to the existing 30-inch stormwater drainage pipe located along McClellan Road.3 Infrastructure required to provide utilities such as water and sewer to the proposed residences would include connections to the existing utility mains within the project vicinity. Specifically, the proposed project would include connection to the existing six-inch water main and eight-inch sewer main located along Cherryland Drive, at the eastern boundary of the project site. Electricity would be provided to the project site by PG&E transmission and distribution systems; however, the project site is supplied energy by Silicon Valley Clean Energy, a local Community Choice Electricity (CCE) Aggregator, which provides 100 percent carbon-free electricity. It should be noted that each residential unit has the option to “opt-out” from the CCE and revert to PG&E for both electricity supply and distribution services. In addition, in accordance with the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, the proposed project would be required to include on-site renewable energy systems (using either the performance pathway or prescriptive compliance) to meet each home’s expected annual electric needs. While, the project would be within the allowed density of the site’s current 1-5 dwelling unit per acre Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation, the project does not meet the City’s zoning standards of minimum lot size of 10,000 sf per lot. However, under changes to the Housing Accountability Act (AB 3194), in effect since 2018, developments do not have to meet the zoning standard if the zoning standard prohibits the development of the site at the densities allowed under the General Plan. As a result, a rezone would not be required for the proposed project. As discussed in further detail below, state law allows the City to determine that the closest appropriate zoning district standards for the proposed project – which it has determined to be the standards set forth in Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code for the following zoning district: Single- Family Residential with a minimum lot area of 7,500 sf (R1-7.5). Project Approvals The proposed project would require the following approvals from the City of Cupertino: • Approval of a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide one parcel into six parcels; • Approval of six Two-Story Permits to develop six two-story single-family homes; and • Approval of six Minor Residential Permits for six second-story balconies, one with each residence. C. DISCUSSION The following section contains substantial evidence showing that the proposed project can be considered exempt from CEQA and is not subject to any of the exceptions set forth in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines. As demonstrated in the analysis below, the proposed project qualifies for exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, Class 32. 3 City of Cupertino. Storm Drain Master Plan. September 2018. PC 09-13-2022 103 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 7 September 2022 In-Fill Development Project Exemption Article 19 of the CEQA Guidelines, Sections 15300 through 15333, includes a list of classes of projects that have been determined not to have a significant effect on the environment, and are therefore exempt from CEQA. Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines provides a categorical exemption for infill development projects that meet the following criteria: (a) The project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed development occurs within the city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The applicability of the above criteria to the proposed project is described in the following sections. Criterion 15332(a): General Plan and Zoning Consistency The CEQA Guidelines provide that a project is “consistent” with applicable general plan and zoning standards if “the density of the proposed project is the same or less than the standard expressed for the involved parcel in the general plan, community plan or zoning action for which an EIR has been certified, and that the project complies with the density-related standards contained in that plan or zoning.” (CEQA Guidelines, Section 15183(i)(2)) The City’s General Plan designates the site Low Density Residential at a density of 1-5 dwelling units per acre and the site is zoned R1-10. The Low Density Residential (1-5 du/ac) land use designation is intended to promote a suburban lifestyle of detached single-family homes. According to the City’s General Plan, planned residential communities can be incorporated into the Low Density Residential land use category if the development form is compatible with adjoining residential development. The Low Density Residential land use designation allows for a density of one to five du/ac. The maximum residential unit yield for the 1.25-acre project site at the maximum density of five dwelling units per acre is six units, which is what the applicant proposes. Thus, the project would be consistent with the maximum allowable density for the land use designation and compatible with surrounding densities within the neighborhood. The R1 zoning districts are divided into multiple subzones allowing for a range of permitted residential densities. With regard to zoning, according to Section 19.28.010 of the City’s Municipal Code, the R1 single-family residence districts are intended to create, preserve, and enhance areas suitable for detached dwellings in order to enhance the identity of residential neighborhoods, ensure provision of light, air and a reasonable level of privacy to individual residential parcels, ensure a reasonable level of compatibility in scale of structures within residential neighborhoods, and reinforce the predominantly low-intensity setting in the community. According to the Housing Accountability Act (Government Code section 65589.5(j)(4)): A proposed housing development project is not inconsistent with the applicable zoning standards and criteria, and shall not require a rezoning, if the housing development project is consistent with the objective general plan standards and criteria but the zoning for the project site is inconsistent with the general plan. […] the local agency may require the proposed housing development project to comply with the objective standards and criteria of the zoning which is consistent with the general plan, however, the standards and criteria PC 09-13-2022 104 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 8 September 2022 shall be applied to facilitate and accommodate development at the density allowed on the site by the general plan and proposed by the proposed housing development project. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) Guidance provides an example of how this standard should be applied in practice, stating that “[…] if a site has a general plan land use designation of high density residential, but the site is zoned industrial, then a local government can require the project to comply with objective development standards in zoning districts that are consistent with the high density residential designation, such as a multifamily high density residential zone.”4 Because buildout of the project site consistent with the R1-10 zoning standards would not allow the development of six units on the site, based on HCD’s Guidance, the project is deemed consistent with applicable zoning standards pursuant to Government Code section 65589.5(j)(4). However, the City could apply objective standards in the Zoning Ordinance that are consistent with the General Plan density, such as the R1-7.5 zoning standards. The project site is approximately 54,244 sf, and the parcels adjacent to the project site are primarily zoned R1-7.5 or R1-6. Therefore, the City has determined that the appropriate zoning district standards for the proposed project would be the standards set forth in Chapter 19.28 of the Cupertino Municipal Code for the R1-7.5 zoning district. As such, a rezone would not be required for the proposed project. To ensure the proposed project would comply with applicable General Plan policies and zoning regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding and/or mitigating adverse environmental effects, such as the City’s Tree Protection Ordinance, an Arborist Report was prepared for the proposed project by Advanced Tree Care (see Appendix A), to assess all trees on-site and evaluate the health and structural condition of the trees. Based on a visual inspection from the ground, the Arborist Report determined which trees could be preserved and removed, and provided guidelines for tree preservation during the design, construction, and maintenance phases of development. According to the Arborist Report, the project site currently contains 21 trees, three of which are considered protected trees pursuant to Chapter 14.18 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. The proposed project does not include the three protected trees on-site, but does include the removal of 17 unprotected trees. Nonetheless, to avoid any inadvertent damage to the three protected trees that would be retained on-site during development of the proposed project, pursuant to Section 14.18.060 of the Municipal Code, the project applicant would be required to adopt a maintenance plan for the protected trees that would be implemented as part of the project. Based on the City’s Municipal Code standards, activities required by the maintenance plan may include, but are not limited to, pruning, and the establishment of tree protection zones during construction of the proposed project. Furthermore, while not anticipated, if the proposed project would require removal of any of the three protected trees during construction, pursuant to Section 14.18.050 of the City’s Municipal Code, a Tree Removal Permit must be obtained. The information required when submitting a Tree Removal Permit application, includes, but is not limited to, the following: • A drawing outlining the location of the tree(s) and proposed tree replacements. • A written explanation of why the tree(s) should be removed. • An Arborist report prepared by a certified, licensed Arborist assessing the proposed removal and replacement. In addition, the City would impose tree replacement standards or in-lieu fees pursuant to Section 14.18.160 of the Municipal Code for any protected trees proposed for removal. Because the 4 California Department of Housing and Community Development Division of Housing Policy Development. Housing Accountability Act Technical Assistance Advisory (Government Code Section 65589.5). September 15, 2020. PC 09-13-2022 105 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 9 September 2022 proposed project would comply with Chapter 14.18 of the City’s Municipal Code, the project would not conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance. The proposed project would also comply with other applicable General Plan policies and zoning regulations adopted for the purpose of avoiding and/or mitigating adverse environmental effects. For example, the proposed project would comply with all relevant City policies and guidelines, including, but not limited to, the standards set forth in Chapter 10.48, Community Noise Control, Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, and Chapter 17.04, Environmental Protections Ordinance, of the City’s Municipal Code. Chapter 17.04 of the City’s Municipal Code provides standard environmental protection requirements that all construction projects must meet, including but not limited to environmental mitigation measures, standard technical report submittal requirements, and standard permit submittal requirements. Based on the above, the proposed project meets Criterion 15332(a). Criterion 15332(b): Project Location, Size, and Context The project site consists of a 1.25-acre parcel located within the Cupertino city limits. The project site is currently developed and is surrounded by existing development. Thus, the proposed project meets Criterion 15332(b). Criterion 15332(c): Endangered, Rare, or Threatened Species Endangered, rare, or threatened species include those plant and wildlife species that have been formally listed, are proposed as endangered or threatened, or are candidates for such listing under the federal and State Endangered Species Acts. Both acts afford protection to listed and proposed species. A search of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB) was conducted in November 2021 for the project site U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic quadrangle to identify if any endangered, rare, or threatened species have the potential to exist within the project site. The intent of the database review was to identify documented occurrences of endangered, rare, or threatened species in the vicinity of the project area, to determine their locations relative to the project site, and to evaluate whether the site meets the habitat requirements of such species. The project site is currently developed. As such, the project site does not contain sensitive habitats supporting endangered, rare, or threatened species, and the site does not meet the habitat requirements for any of the documented endangered, rare, or threatened species known to occur within the project region. Additionally, all documented occurrences of the endangered, rare, or threatened species identified have occurred outside of the immediate project vicinity. Based on the limited habitat provided on-site and the developed nature of the project area, along with the previously recorded locations of endangered, rare, or threatened species occurrences in the project region, as specified in the CNDDB search results, endangered, rare, or threatened plant and wildlife species are not likely to occur on the project site and would not be impacted by the proposed project. Moreover, this section of the exemption criteria focuses narrowly on whether the project site has value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Thus, the relevant inquiry is not whether any endangered, rare, or threatened species could occur on-site due to the habitat types present, but, more specifically, whether on-site habitats provide value to endangered, rare, or threatened species. As stated above, the project site does not contain any valuable habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species and, thus, the proposed project meets Criterion 15332(c). PC 09-13-2022 106 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 10 September 2022 In addition, while not endangered, rare, or threatened species listed under the federal and State Endangered Species Acts and, thus, not subject to Criterion 15332(c), the potential exists for nesting birds and raptors protected under Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) of 1918 to occur within the existing on-site trees. Under the MBTA, destroying active nests, eggs, and young is illegal. In addition, although special-status bat species are not known to occur within the project site, if vacated prior to the initiation of demolition activities, the existing on-site structures could provide suitable roosting habitat for special-status bat species. Special-status bat species include any bat species listed as California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) Species of Special Concern, which are species that face extirpation in California if current population and habitat trends continue. Although CDFW Species of Special Concern generally do not have special legal status, they are given special consideration under CEQA. Nonetheless, habitat for nesting birds and raptors and roosting bats is not uncommon within the project area. Furthermore, the City standard conditions of approval related to the protection of nesting birds, consistent with Section 17.04.050(D)(1) of the Cupertino Municipal Code, as well as City standard conditions of approval related to the protection of special-status bats, consistent with Section 17.04.050(D)(2) of the Cupertino Municipal Code would be implemented, which would ensure that impacts to nesting raptors, migratory birds, and other protected birds, as well as special-status bats, would not occur. Again, the above discussion is for informational purposes and the aforementioned species are not subject to Criterion 15332(c), which focuses on endangered, rare, or threatened species and their habitat. Based on the above, the proposed project meets Criterion 15332(c). Criterion 15332(d): Traffic, Noise, Air Quality, and Water Quality The following sections present analysis regarding potential effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, and water quality resulting from implementation of the proposed project. Traffic Section 15064.3 of the CEQA Guidelines provides specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. Pursuant to Section 15064.3, analysis of vehicle miles travelled (VMT) attributable to a project is the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. Other relevant considerations may include the effects of the project on transit and non-motorized travel. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released The Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA, which includes screening thresholds to identify when a lead agency may screen out VMT impacts.5 The City of Cupertino adopted VMT thresholds of significance in March 2021, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.7(b), which are based upon the Governor’s OPR’s screening thresholds. Similar to the OPR Technical Advisory, the City of Cupertino VMT thresholds identify different project types that are assumed to cause a less- than-significant transportation impact and, thus, a detailed VMT study is not necessary. The OPR recommendations include the following screening criteria: • Office or residential projects not exceeding a level of 15 percent below existing VMT per capita; • Projects (including office, residential, retail, and mixed-use developments) proposed within half a mile of an existing major transit stop or within a quarter of a mile of an existing stop along a high-quality transit corridor; • Projects proposing 100 percent affordable residential development in infill locations; and • Projects that generate or attract fewer than 110 trips per day. 5 Governor’s Office of Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. December 2018. PC 09-13-2022 107 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 11 September 2022 Any project that meets any of the above criteria would be considered to result in a less-than- significant impact related to VMT. Although Chapter 17.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, which identifies the City’s VMT thresholds, does not specifically include the screening criterion for projects that generate or attract fewer than 110 trips per day, the City generally relies on the OPR Guidelines regarding small projects.6 The anticipated trip generation for the proposed project was estimated using standard rates published in the 10th Edition of the ITE Trip Generation Manual (2017). A trip rate of 9.44 average daily trips (ADT) per residential unit, based on the ITE “Single-Family Residential” land use (ITE Land Use Category #210), was applied to the six proposed single-family residences. In addition, because the ITE Trip Generation Manual does not provide trip rates for ADUs, the trip rate of 7.32 ADT, based on the ITE “Multi-Family Housing (Low-Rise)” land use (ITE Land Use Category #220), was conservatively applied to the six proposed ADUs. Based on the ITE trip rates described above, the proposed project would be expected to generate an average of 101 trips per day. Therefore, the proposed project would meet the OPR screening criteria for projects that generate or attract fewer than 110 trips per day, and the project would not be considered to conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.3(b). Consequently, the proposed project would result in a less-than-significant effect related to VMT. Noise Residences are not typically associated with the generation of substantial noise. Operation of the proposed project would include typical residential noise, which would be compatible with the adjacent existing residential uses. As such, the proposed project is not anticipated to contribute a measurable operational noise level increase to the existing ambient noise environment at any sensitive receptor locations. Based upon the Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) guidance for determining increases in traffic noise, where existing traffic noise levels are between 60 and 65 dB Ldn, at the outdoor activity areas of noise-sensitive uses, a +3 dB Ldn increase in roadway noise levels would be considered significant. According to Table 4.10-10 of the General Plan EIR, the existing traffic noise level on the segment of McClellan Road between S. Stelling Road to S. De Anza Boulevard, on which the project site is located, is 64.6 dB Ldn. Generally, a doubling in traffic volumes is required to increase traffic noise levels by 3.0 dB, which is considered to be the threshold for a significant increase pursuant to the FICON. As shown in Table 4.13-7 of the General Plan EIR, the roadway segments in the project vicinity experience between 20,598 and 28,730 ADT. As discussed above, the proposed project would be expected to generate an average of 101 trips per day. Accordingly, the proposed project would not double traffic volumes on local roadways and, thus, would not substantially increase traffic noise in the project vicinity. Additionally, the project site is currently developed with a residential use and the proposed project is consistent with the site’s current land use designation. Therefore, traffic noise level increases associated with a single-family residential development on the project site have been previously anticipated by the City. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in operational noise increases that would be considered to result in significant effects on sensitive receptors in the project vicinity. 6 Personal communication between Chris Corrao, Senior Transit and Transportation Planner, City of Cupertino Public Works Department, and Nick Pappani, Vice President, Raney Planning and Management, Inc., November 19, 2021. PC 09-13-2022 108 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 12 September 2022 During the construction of the proposed project, heavy equipment would be used for demolition and building construction, which would temporarily increase ambient noise levels when in use. Noise levels would vary depending on the type of equipment used, how the equipment is operated, and how well the equipment is maintained. In addition, noise exposure at any single point outside the project site would vary depending on the proximity of construction activities to that point. Standard construction equipment, such as backhoes, loaders, and trucks, would be used on-site. Table 2 shows maximum noise levels associated with typical construction equipment. Based on the table, activities involved in typical construction would generate maximum noise levels up to 85 dB at a distance of 50 feet. As one increases the distance between equipment, or increases separation of areas with simultaneous construction activity, dispersion and distance attenuation reduce the effects of combining separate noise sources. The noise levels from a source decrease at a rate of approximately 6 dB per every doubling of distance from the noise source. Pursuant to Section 10.48.053 of the City’s Municipal Code, grading, construction, and demolition activities are permitted to exceed the City’s established noise limits during daytime hours provided that any piece of equipment involved in such activities has high-quality noise mufflers and abatement devices installed, is in good condition, and the activities meet the established criteria that individual devices do not produce a noise level more than 87 dBA at a distance of 25 feet, or the noise level on any nearby property does not exceed 80 dBA. Table 2 Construction Equipment Noise Type of Equipment Maximum Level, dB at 50 feet Backhoe 78 Compactor 83 Compressor (air) 78 Dozer 82 Dump Truck 76 Excavator 81 Generator 81 Pneumatic Tools 85 Source: Federal Highway Administration, Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, January 2006. The nearest noise-sensitive receptor is located less than 50 feet from the southern project site boundary. Thus, construction activities associated with the proposed project could exceed the levels shown in Table 2 at the nearest noise-sensitive receptor. However, the proposed project would be required to comply with Chapter 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, which prohibits construction activities on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, and during the nighttime period, in areas within 750 feet of a residential area. In addition, the proposed project would be required to comply with the City’s standard conditions of approval regarding construction noise, as required in Section 17.04.050(G) of the Cupertino Municipal Code, which would reduce construction noise levels sufficient to ensure that the proposed project would not result in construction noise increases that would be considered to result in significant effects on sensitive receptors in the project vicinity. Based on the above, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in short-term construction- related or long-term operational noise generation that would be considered to have the potential to result in significant effects on the environment. PC 09-13-2022 109 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 13 September 2022 Air Quality The City of Cupertino is located in the San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin (SFBAAB), which is under the jurisdiction of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). The SFBAAB area is currently designated as a nonattainment area for State and federal ozone, State and federal fine particulate matter 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5), and State respirable particulate matter 10 microns in diameter (PM10) ambient air quality standards (AAQS). The SFBAAB is designated attainment or unclassified for all other AAQS. It should be noted that on January 9, 2013, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) issued a final rule to determine that the Bay Area has attained the 24-hour PM2.5 federal AAQS. Nonetheless, the Bay Area must continue to be designated as nonattainment for the federal PM2.5 AAQS until such time as the BAAQMD submits a redesignation request and a maintenance plan to the USEPA, and the USEPA approves the proposed redesignation. The USEPA has not yet approved a request for redesignation of the SFBAAB; therefore, the SFBAAB remains in nonattainment for 24-hour PM2.5. In compliance with regulations, due to the nonattainment designations of the area, the BAAQMD periodically prepares and updates air quality plans that provide emission reduction strategies to achieve attainment of the AAQS, including control strategies to reduce air pollutant emissions through regulations, incentive programs, public education, and partnerships with other agencies. The current air quality plans are prepared in cooperation with the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) and the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG). The most recent federal ozone plan is the 2001 Ozone Attainment Plan, which was adopted on October 24, 2001 and approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on November 1, 2001. The plan was submitted to the USEPA on November 30, 2001 for review and approval. The most recent State ozone plan is the 2017 Clean Air Plan, adopted on April 19, 2017. The 2017 Clean Air Plan was developed as a multi-pollutant plan that provides an integrated control strategy to reduce ozone, PM, toxic air contaminants (TACs), and greenhouse gases (GHGs). Although a plan for achieving the State PM10 standard is not required, the BAAQMD has prioritized measures to reduce PM in developing the control strategy for the 2017 Clean Air Plan. The control strategy serves as the backbone of the BAAQMD’s current PM control program. The aforementioned air quality plans contain mobile source controls, stationary source controls, and transportation control measures to be implemented in the region to attain the State and federal AAQS within the SFBAAB. Adopted BAAQMD rules and regulations, as well as the thresholds of significance, have been developed with the intent to ensure continued attainment of AAQS, or to work towards attainment of AAQS for which the area is currently designated nonattainment, consistent with applicable air quality plans. For development projects, BAAQMD establishes significance thresholds for emissions of the ozone precursors reactive organic gases (ROG) and oxides of nitrogen (NOX), as well as for PM10, and PM2.5, expressed in pounds per day (lbs/day) and tons per year (tons/yr). The thresholds are listed in Table 3. Thus, by exceeding the BAAQMD’s mass emission thresholds for operational emissions of ROG, NOX, or PM10, a project would be considered to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the BAAQMD’s air quality planning efforts. Table 3 BAAQMD Thresholds of Significance Pollutant Construction Operational Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Average Daily Emissions (lbs/day) Maximum Annual Emissions (tons/year) ROG 54 54 10 NOX 54 54 10 PM10 (exhaust) 82 82 15 PM2.5 (exhaust) 54 54 10 Source: BAAQMD, CEQA Guidelines, May 2017. PC 09-13-2022 110 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 14 September 2022 The proposed project would involve demolition of the existing on-site development and redevelopment of the project site with six single-family residences. The proposed project’s construction and operational emissions were quantified using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) software version 2020.4.0 - a Statewide model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify air quality emissions, including GHG emissions, from land use projects. The model applies inherent default values for various land uses, including construction data, vehicle mix, trip length, average speed, etc. Where project-specific information is available, such information is applied in the model. The proposed project’s modeling assumed the following: • Construction would commence in May of 20227 and occur over an approximately one-year period; • Approximately 15,425 sf of material would be demolished during demolition activities; and • The project would apply a 20 percent water conservation strategy compliant with the State Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), as adopted by the City and reflected in Chapter 14.15 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. It should be noted that in accordance with the 2019 Building Energy Efficiency Standards, the proposed project would be required to include on-site renewable energy systems (using either the performance pathway or prescriptive compliance) to meet each home’s expected annual electric needs. However, project-specific information regarding on-site solar is not available at this time; therefore, inherent default values were applied regarding energy emissions associated with the proposed project. The proposed project’s estimated emissions associated with construction and operations are provided below. All CalEEMod results are included as Appendix B to this Memorandum. Construction Emissions According to the CalEEMod results, the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated construction criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 4. As shown in the table, the proposed project’s construction emissions would be below the applicable thresholds of significance. Table 4 Maximum Unmitigated Construction Emissions (lbs/day) Pollutant Proposed Project Emissions Threshold of Significance Exceeds Threshold? ROG 3.34 54 NO NOX 33.12 54 NO PM10 (exhaust) 1.61 82 NO PM10 (fugitive) 19.80 None N/A PM2.5 (exhaust) 1.48 54 NO PM2.5 (fugitive) 10.14 None N/A Source: CalEEMod, November 2021 (see Appendix B). 7 It is noted that when the air quality analysis was conducted, project construction was anticipated to commence in May 2022. While this is no longer the case, the analysis presented is considered conservative, as construction fleets and electricity generation are becoming more efficient over time due to compliance with federal and State regulations; thus, emissions associated with construction equipment and activities would correspondingly reduce over time. PC 09-13-2022 111 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 15 September 2022 Although thresholds of significance for mass emissions of fugitive dust PM10 and PM2.5 have not been identified by the City of Cupertino or BAAQMD, the proposed project’s estimated fugitive dust emissions have been included for informational purposes. Section 17.04.050(A) of the Cupertino Municipal Code includes the City’s Air Quality Permit Requirements. The requirements are imposed as standard conditions of approval for all projects within the City. In addition, all projects within the jurisdiction of the BAAQMD are required to implement the BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures, which would be included as conditions of approval for the project: 1. All exposed surfaces (e.g., parking areas, staging areas, soil piles, graded areas, and unpaved access roads) shall be watered two times per day. 2. All haul trucks transporting soil, sand, or other loose material off-site shall be covered. 3. All visible mud or dirt track-out onto adjacent public roads shall be removed using wet power vacuum street sweepers at least once per day. The use of dry power sweeping is prohibited. 4. All vehicle speeds on unpaved roads shall be limited to 15 mph. 5. All roadways, driveways, and sidewalks to be paved shall be completed as soon as possible. Building pads shall be laid as soon as possible after grading unless seeding or soil binders are used. 6. Idling times shall be minimized either by shutting equipment off when not in use or reducing the maximum idling time to five minutes (as required by the California airborne toxics control measure Title 13, Section 2485 of California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Clear signage shall be provided for construction workers at all access points. 7. All construction equipment shall be maintained and properly tuned in accordance with manufacturers specifications. All equipment shall be checked by a certified visible emissions evaluator. 8. Post a publicly visible sign with the telephone number and person to contact at the lead agency regarding dust complaints. This person shall respond and take corrective action within 48 hours. The Air District’s phone number shall also be visible to ensure compliance with applicable regulations. The proposed project’s implementation of the requirements listed in Section 17.04.050(A) of the Cupertino Municipal Code, as well as implementation of BAAQMD’s Basic Construction Mitigation Measures listed above for the project’s construction activities, would help to further minimize construction-related emissions. Because the proposed project would be below the applicable thresholds of significance for construction emissions, project construction would not result in a significant air quality impact. Operational Emissions According to the CalEEMod results, the proposed project would result in maximum unmitigated operational criteria air pollutant emissions as shown in Table 5. As shown in the table, the proposed project’s operational emissions would be well below the applicable thresholds of significance. As such, the proposed project would not result in a significant air quality impact during operations. PC 09-13-2022 112 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 16 September 2022 Table 5 Maximum Unmitigated Operational Emissions Pollutant Proposed Project Emissions Threshold of Significance Exceeds Threshold? lbs/day tons/yr lbs/day tons/yr ROG 13.36 0.23 54 10 NO NOX 0.70 0.08 54 10 NO PM10 (exhaust) 2.29 0.02 82 15 NO PM10 (fugitive) 0.56 0.10 None None N/A PM2.5 (exhaust) 2.29 0.03 54 10 NO PM2.5 (fugitive) 0.15 0.02 None None N/A Source: CalEEMod, November 2021 (see Appendix B). As discussed above, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in short-term construction- related or long-term operational emissions of air quality pollutants that would be considered to have the potential to result in significant effects on the environment. Water Quality The following section describes the project’s consistency with applicable water quality standards and waste discharge requirements during construction and operation. Construction The project site is currently developed with a single-family residence, garage, and accessory structure in the northern portion of the site, as well as a barn and truck yard in the southern portion of the site. As such, the site contains a substantial amount of impervious areas. Nonetheless, during the early stages of future construction activities, topsoil would be exposed due to grading of the site. After grading and prior to overlaying the ground surface with impervious surfaces and structures, the potential exists for wind and water erosion to discharge sediment and/or urban pollutants into stormwater runoff, which could adversely affect water quality downstream. New development within the City that disturbs one or more acres of land is required to comply with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Construction Permit and to prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) incorporating best management practices (BMPs) to control sedimentation, erosion, and hazardous materials contamination of runoff during construction. In California, the NPDES permitting program is administered by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) through nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards (RWQCBs). The proposed project would disturb approximately 1.25 acres, and, thus, would be subject to such requirements. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to comply with Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Prevention, of the City’s Municipal Code, in order to prevent siltation and erosion. Furthermore, Chapter 16.08, Excavations, Grading, and Retaining Walls, of the City’s Municipal Code, requires applicants to provide and comply with an Interim Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (Interim Plan). Because the project would comply with the above requirements, the proposed project would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, or otherwise degrade water quality, during construction. Operation Residential use of the project site would not involve operations typically associated with the generation or discharge of polluted water. Thus, typical operations on the project site would not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, nor degrade water quality. However, the potential for urban runoff would be increased with the addition of impervious surfaces on the site, which could contain pollutants if the runoff comes into contact with vehicle PC 09-13-2022 113 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 17 September 2022 fluids on parking surfaces and/or landscape fertilizers and herbicides prior to reaching downstream waters All new development or redevelopment projects that create and/or replace 10,000 sf or more of impervious surfaces would be required to incorporate source control, site design, and stormwater treatment measures into the project, pursuant to the requirements in the Santa Clara Valley Urban Runoff Pollution Prevention Program C.3 Stormwater Handbook. The C.3 requirements include minimization of impervious surfaces, measures to detain or infiltrate runoff from peak flows, and agreements to ensure that the stormwater treatment and flow control facilities are maintained in perpetuity. The proposed project would create and/or replace a total of 27,539 sf of impervious surface. Thus, the project would be subject to the C.3 requirements. The proposed project would involve seven drainage management areas (DMAs), consisting of one DMA on each proposed lot and one within the widened portion of Cherryland Drive. Runoff from the DMA on each lot would be directed towards an associated bioretention basin. The bioretention basins and pervious areas (i.e., landscaped areas) would treat stormwater primarily by filtering runoff slowly through an active layer of soil, naturally allowing for removal of pollutants. The bioretention basins would have a maximum ponding depth of 9 inches, with 24-inch soil media backfill placed over 18-inch drain rock bed. Roof and yard drainage would filter through landscaped areas to provide stormwater pre-treatment before being directed into the basins. It should be noted that, pursuant to Section 9.18.210 of the Municipal Code, the City prohibits the use of copper metal roofing and copper architectural materials. The project would also include permeable pavers for the proposed driveways and roadway to further reduce impervious surfaces and promote stormwater infiltration. A series of new on-site pipes, including a 24-inch detention pipe, would collect and detain the on-site stormwater and convey any overflow water to the existing 30-inch stormwater drainage pipe located along McClellan Road. According to the Preliminary Stormwater Analysis prepared for the proposed project (see Appendix C),8 each of the bioretention basins would be sized to exceed the minimum volume requirement necessary to adequately handle all runoff from the proposed impervious surfaces and landscaping within each DMA. Thus, the proposed project would comply with the requirements of the SWRCB and the RWQCB, and would meet or exceed C.3 requirements. Furthermore, Section 17.04.050(F) of the Cupertino Municipal Code includes the City’s Hydrology and Water Quality Permit Requirements. The requirements are imposed as standard conditions of approval for all projects within the City. Accordingly, the project would comply with all relevant water quality standards and waste discharge requirements, and would not degrade water quality during operation. Based on the above, the proposed project would not result in any significant effects related to water quality during construction or operation. Conclusion Based on the above, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in any significant effects related to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality during construction or operation. Thus, the project would meet Criterion 15332(d). 8 MH Engineering Co. Preliminary Stormwater Analysis 20860 McClellan Road 6 Lot Single Family Residential Project (APN 359-20-030) Cherryland Drive. August 5, 2021. PC 09-13-2022 114 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 18 September 2022 Criterion 15332(e): Utilities and Public Services Sewer service for the project site would be provided by the Cupertino Sanitary District, and water service would be provided by San Jose Water Company. Infrastructure required to provide utilities such as water and sewer to the proposed residences would include connections to the existing mains located within the project vicinity. Specifically, the proposed project would include connection to the existing six-inch water main and eight-inch sewer main located along Cherryland Drive, at the eastern boundary of the project site. The project would detain and treat all on-site stormwater runoff prior to discharge into the City’s stormwater drainage system, consistent with the City’s C.3 Stormwater Standards. Stormwater would be conveyed and discharged to an existing 30-inch stormwater drainage pipe located along McClellan Road. Electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications services would be provided by way of connections to existing infrastructure located within the immediate project vicinity. Natural gas infrastructure would not be provided in any of the proposed single-family homes under the City’s all-electric reach code. However, ADUs are exempt from the City’s all-electric requirement and, thus, may include natural gas connections. It should be noted that the project would be required to adhere to Section 16.54 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, which would require all new buildings have all-electric appliances and electric vehicle charging provisions. As such, PG&E may need to upgrade transformers or other electrical infrastructure at the neighborhood level. However, adequate electric power supplies exist to serve the project and neighborhood level upgrades would not require new or expanded electric power facilities. Given the presence of existing utilities in the immediate project vicinity, the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, stormwater drainage, or other utility infrastructure would not be required. In addition, given that the proposed project is consistent with the site’s current General Plan land use designation, increases in demand on existing utilities and public services such as fire, police, and schools, associated with the project have been previously anticipated in the General Plan and accounted for in local planning efforts. Thus, the site would be adequately served by all required utilities and public services and the proposed project would meet Criterion 15332(e). Exceptions to Categorical Exemptions analysis Even if a project is ordinarily exempt under any of the potential categorical exemptions, CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2 provides specific instances where exceptions to otherwise applicable exemptions apply. Exceptions to a categorical exemption apply in the following circumstances: (a) Location. Classes 3, 4, 5, 6, and 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located – a project that is ordinarily insignificant in its impact on the environment may in a particularly sensitive environment be significant. Therefore, these classes are considered to apply all instances, except where the project may impact on an environmental resource of hazardous or critical concern where designated, precisely mapped, and officially adopted pursuant to law by federal, state, or local agencies. (b) Cumulative Impact. All exemptions for these classes are inapplicable when the cumulative impact of successive projects of the same type in the same place, over time is significant. (c) Significant Effect. A categorical exemption shall not be used for an activity where there is a reasonable possibility that the activity will have a significant effect on the environment due to unusual circumstances. (d) Scenic Highways. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may result in damage to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, historic buildings, rock outcroppings, or similar resources, within a highway officially designated as a state scenic highway. This does not apply to improvements which are required as mitigation by an adopted negative declaration or certified EIR. PC 09-13-2022 115 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 19 September 2022 (e) Hazardous Waste Sites. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. (f) Historical Resources. A categorical exemption shall not be used for a project which may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource. The following analysis addresses whether any of the exceptions to the CEQA exemption apply to the proposed project. Criterion 15300.2(a): Location CEQA exemption classes 3, 4, 5, 6, or 11 are qualified by consideration of where the project is to be located. Given that the proposed project qualifies for exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15332, Class 32, an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(a) does not apply to the proposed project. Criterion 15300.2(b): Cumulative Impact Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(b), in applying this exception, the cumulative impact must result from “successive projects of the same type in the same place.” Both the “same type” and “same place” limitations restrict the scope of this exception.9 The project site is located within an urbanized area of the City, which is entirely developed. Because the proposed project is consistent with the project site’s General Plan land use designation, cumulative impacts associated with buildout of the project site have been previously anticipated by the City and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. As discussed above, the project would not require off-site utility upsizing or other related improvements with the potential to result in cumulatively considerable impacts. The project does not include any unique features that would result in new or more severe cumulative impacts beyond what has been analyzed in the General Plan EIR, and an exception to the exemption pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(b) does not apply to the proposed project. Criterion 15300.2(c): Significant Effect In listing a class of projects as exempt, the Secretary has determined that the environmental changes typically associated with projects in that class are not significant effects within the meaning of CEQA, even though an argument might be made that they are potentially significant. The plain language of Guidelines Section 15300.2, subdivision (c), requires that a potentially significant effect must be “due to unusual circumstances” for the exception to apply. The determination as to whether there are “unusual circumstances” (Guidelines, § 15300.2, subd. (c)) is reviewed under PRC Section 21168.5’s substantial evidence prong. Whether a particular project presents circumstances that are unusual for projects in an exempt class is an essentially factual inquiry. As to this question, the lead agency serves as “the finder of fact”. As the courts have noted, local conditions are relevant in determining whether the environmental effects of a proposed project are unusual or typical. In general, the project site is located in an urbanized area and does not contain any unique or unusual features with the potential to result in a potentially significant effect. For example, the project site does not include any aquatic features and, as discussed further below, is not included on any lists of hazardous waste sites. Thus, an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(c) does not apply to the proposed project. 9 Stephen L. Kostka and Michael H. Zischke. Practice Under the California Environmental Quality Act, Second Edition [pg. 5-68]. March 2019 Update. PC 09-13-2022 116 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 20 September 2022 Criterion 15300.2(d): Scenic Highway According to the California Scenic Highway Mapping System, the project site is not located within the vicinity of an officially designated State Scenic Highway.10 The nearest officially designated State Scenic Highway is the portion of SR 280 beginning west of Stanford University and north of SR 85, which is located over 10 miles away and is not visible from the project site. Thus, an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(d) does not apply to the proposed project. Criterion 15300.2(e): Hazardous Waste Sites Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(e), a categorical exemption shall not be used for a project located on a site which is included on any list compiled pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the Government Code. The California Environmental Protection Agency provides a list of data resources that provide information regarding the facilities or sites identified as meeting the “Cortese List” requirements, pursuant to Government Code 65962.5. The project site is not located on the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List, which is a component of the Cortese List.11 The other components of the Cortese List include the list of leaking underground storage tank sites from the SWRCB’s GeoTracker database, the list of solid waste disposal sites identified by the SWRCB, and the list of active Cease and Desist Orders (CDO) and Cleanup and Abatement Orders (CAO) from the SWRCB. The project site is not located on any of the aforementioned components of the Cortese List.12 Thus, the project site is not located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(e) does not apply to the proposed project. Criterion 15300.2(f): Historical Resources Historical resources are features that are associated with the lives of historically-important persons and/or historically significant events, that embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important to the pre-history or history of the local area, California, or the nation. Examples of typical historical resources include, but are not limited to, buildings, farmsteads, rail lines, bridges, and trash scatters containing objects such as colored glass and ceramics. Currently, the site is developed with a single-family residence, barn, garage, accessory structure, and a truck yard. A records search of the California Historic Resources Information System (CHRIS) was performed by the Northwest Information Center (NWIC) for cultural resource site records and survey reports within the project area.13 The NWIC concluded that the project site does not contain any recorded archaeological resources. However, the records search determined that the on-site structures were constructed between 1948 and 1953, and, thus, meet the Office of Historic Preservation’s minimum age standard that buildings, structures, and objects 45 years or older may be of historical value. Four criteria are used to determine if a potential resource may be considered significant and eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and/or the California Register of Historic Resources (CRHR). The criteria include resources that: 10 California Department of Transportation. Scenic Highways. Available at: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap- landscape-architecture-and-community-livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways. Accessed June 2022. 11 Department of Toxic Substances Control. Hazardous Waste and Substances Site List (Cortese). Available at: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/. Accessed June 2022. 12 CalEPA. Cortese List Data Resources. Available at: https://calepa.ca.gov/sitecleanup/corteselist/. Accessed June 2022. 13 Northwest Information Center. Records Search Results for the Proposed 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project. November 8, 2021. PC 09-13-2022 117 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Subdivision Project Categorical Exemption Memorandum 21 September 2022 A. Are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of history; or B. Are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; or C. Embody the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction, or that represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or D. Have yielded or may likely yield information important in prehistory or history. A review of historic aerial photographs revealed that prior to 1948, the project site and vicinity are occupied by fruit orchards. By 1953, most of the fruit trees had been removed from the project site and surrounding area, and McClellan Road had been developed, as well as residential uses along the roadway, including the on-site structures. In the years following 1953, the project site remained relatively the same, while residential development continued to replace the remaining orchards in the surrounding area. By 1991, all of the remaining orchards had been replaced with development within the project vicinity. Few changes have occurred to the overall project area between 1991 and present day. However, some building re-configuring and cosmetic updates have been made to the buildings on the project site since their original construction (between 1948 and 1953). Accordingly, the buildings have been modified from their original construction, which has diminished the buildings’ integrity of design, materials, workmanship, and feeling. In addition, the on-site buildings are substantially similar in the design, style, and construction of the other residential development in the project vicinity, and the residential development within the project vicinity is not associated with important events, personalities and/or technologies important in State or regional history. As such, the existing on-site buildings lack any distinctive characteristics of type, religion, method of construction, or artistic value, and would not meet any of the criteria to be listed in the NRHP or CRHR. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, and an exception to the exemption under CEQA Guidelines Section 15300.2(f) does not apply to the proposed project. D. CONCLUSION This Memorandum demonstrates that the proposed project can be considered exempt from CEQA under Section 15332, and does not meet any of the exceptions to categorical exemptions set forth in Section 15300.2 of the CEQA Guidelines. PC 09-13-2022 118 of 439 Appendix A Arborist Report PC 09-13-2022 119 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 1 | Page Alok Ventures LLC., Alok Damireddy 7756 Country Lane Pleasanton, CA 94566 Site: 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino Dear Alok, At your request I visited the above site for the purpose of inspecting and commenting on the regulated trees around the property. Six new homes are planned for this location, prompting the need for this tree protection report. Method: Cupertino protects trees according to specimen and size as seen below: All Street Trees. Specimen Trees of the species listed below with either a minimum single trunk diameter of 12 inches (38 inch circumference) or a minimum multi-trunk diameter of 24 inches (75 inch circumference) measured 4.5 feet above ground level. Aesculus californica, Acer macrophyllum, Cedrus atlantica ‘Glauca’, Cedrus deodara, Platanus racemose, Quercus agrifolia, Quercus douglasii, Quercus kelloggii, Quercus lobate, Quercus wislizenii, Umbellularia californica The location of the trees on this site can be found on the plan provided by you. Each tree is given an identification number. The trees are measured at 54 inches above ground level (DBH or Diameter at Breast Height). A condition rating of 1 to 100 is assigned to each tree representing form and vitality on the following scale: 1 to 29 Very Poor 30 to 49 Poor 50 to 69 Fair 70 to 89 Good 90 to 100 Excellent The height and spread of each tree is estimated. A Comments section is provided for any significant observations affecting the condition rating of the tree. PC 09-13-2022 120 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 2 | Page A Summary and Tree Protection Plan are at the end of the survey providing recommendations for maintaining the health and condition of the trees during and after construction. If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to call. Sincerely Robert Weatherill Certified Arborist WE 1936A PC 09-13-2022 121 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 3 | Page Tree Survey Tree# Species DBH Ht/Sp Con Rating Comments 1 Douglas fir 12.3” 40/20 40 Good health, poor condition, one sided, Pseudotsuga menziesii unbalanced, Not Regulated 2 Fig 8.6”/8.9” 12/15 50 Good health, fair condition, topped Ficus spp Not Regulated 3 Persimmon 11.2” 25/15 60 Fair health and condition Diospyros japonica Not Regulated 4 Walnut 14.3” 15/20 10 Very poor health and condition Juglans nigra Not Regulated 5 Citrus 10.0”@1’ 12/10 60 Fair health and condition Citrus spp Not Regulated 6 Aleppo pine 4.0” 60/50 50 Fair health and condition Pinus halepensis Not Regulated 7 Monterey pine 33.2” 55/40 50 Fair health and condition, topped, Pinus radiata Not Regulated 8 Monterey pine 21.5” 50/20 45 Poor health and condition, topped Pinus radiata Not Regulated 9 Incense cedar 11.2” 35/6 45 Poor health and condition Calocedrus decurrens Not Regulated 10 Incense cedar 12.2” 35/6 45 Poor health and condition Calocedrus decurrens Not Regulated 11 Coast live oak 8.0”/8.3”/8.1” 25/18 60 Good health, poor condition, Quercus agrifolia codominant at 2’, Regulated 12 Coast live oak 12.3” 25/20 60 Good health, poor condition Quercus agrifolia Regulated 13 Monterey pine 32.2” 50/50 50 Fair health and condition, neighbors Pinus radiata tree, Not Regulated 14 Citrus 4.7”/4.3”@grade 10/5 10 Very poor health and condition, almost Citrus spp dead, Not Regulated 15 Irish yew 19.6”@grade 15/15 30 Poor health and condition, codominant Taxus baccata at grade, Not Regulated 16 Deodar cedar 31.3” 60/30 50 Good health, poor condition, topped, Cedrus deodara broken limbs, Regulated 17 Monterey pine 33.0” 50/30 50 Fair health, poor condition, thin canopy Pinus radiata topped, Not Regulated 18 Stump PC 09-13-2022 122 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 4 | Page Tree Survey Tree# Species DBH Ht/Sp Con Rating Comments 19 Incense cedar 17.5” 35/20 40 Poor health and condition Calocedrus decurrens Not Regulated 20 Douglas fir 22.5” 35/20 0 Dead Pseudotsuga menziesii Not Regulated 21 Pittosporum 4.5”/4.2”/5.1” 12/15 70 Good health and condition Pittosporum tobira Not Regulated Summary: Tree #s 1, 4, 9, 10, 14, 15, 19 and 20 are either dead or in very poor health and condition and should be removed. Tree #s 6, 7, 8, 13, 17 are pines. Pines are not Regulated trees. Pines are not tolerant to construction impacts and even with all tree protection measures in place, they may decline further during the construction period and eventually become infested with beetles, which will ultimately kill the trees. Tree # 18 is a stump standing 1 foot tall Tree # 13 is on the neighbor’s property and should be protected during construction. Tree #s 11, 12 and 16 are Specimen trees by merit of their size and species and should be protected during construction The remaining trees, #s 2, 3, 5 and 21 are smaller trees that are not specimen trees and can be removed if desired. PC 09-13-2022 123 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 5 | Page Tree Protection Plan 1. The Tree Protection Zone (TPZ) should be defined with protective fencing. This should be cyclone or chain link fencing on 11/2” or 2” posts driven at least 2 feet in to the ground standing at least 6 feet tall. Normally a TPZ is defined by the dripline of the tree. I recommend the TPZ’s as follows:- Tree # 11: TPZ should be at 11 feet radius from the trunk of the tree in accordance with Type I Tree Protection as outlined and illustrated in image 2.15-1 and 2 (6). Tree # 12: TPZ should be at 8 feet radius from the trunk of the tree in accordance with Type I Tree Protection as outlined and illustrated in image 2.15-1 and 2 (6). Tree # 13: TPZ should be at 20 feet radius from the trunk of the tree closing on the sidewalk in accordance with Type I Tree Protection as outlined and illustrated in image 2.15-1 and 2 (6). Tree # 16: TPZ should be at 20 feet radius from the trunk of the tree closing on the sidewalk in accordance with Type I Tree Protection as outlined and illustrated in image 2.15-1 and 2 (6). PC 09-13-2022 124 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 6 | Page 2. Any pruning and maintenance of the trees shall be carried out before construction begins. This should allow for any clearance requirements for both the new structure and any construction machinery. This will eliminate the possibility of damage during construction. The pruning should be carried out by an arborist, not by construction personnel. No limbs greater than 4” in diameter shall be removed. Tree # 16 has a lot of dead wood and broken limbs. If this tree is to remain, this tree should be pruned for safety and clearances. 3. Any excavation in ground where there is a potential to damage roots of 1” or more in diameter should be carefully hand dug. Where possible, roots should be dug around rather than cut.(2) 4. If roots are broken, every effort should be made to remove the damaged area and cut it back to its closest lateral root. A clean cut should be made with a saw or pruners. This will prevent any infection from damaged roots spreading throughout the root system and into the tree.(2) 5. Do Not:.(4) a. Allow run off or spillage of damaging materials into the area below any tree canopy. b. Store materials, stockpile soil, park or drive vehicles within the TPZ of the tree. c. Cut, break, skin or bruise roots, branches or trunk without first obtaining permission from the city arborist. d. Allow fires under any adjacent trees. e. Discharge exhaust into foliage. f. Secure cable, chain or rope to trees or shrubs. g. Apply soil sterilants under pavement near existing trees. 6. Where roots are exposed, they should be kept covered with the native soil or four layers of wetted, untreated burlap. Roots will dry out and die if left exposed to the air for too long.(4) 7. Route pipes into alternate locations to avoid conflict with roots.(4) 8. Where it is not possible to reroute pipes or trenches, the contractor is to bore beneath the dripline of the tree. The boring shall take place no less than 3 feet below the surface of the soil in order to avoid encountering “feeder” roots.(4) 9. Compaction of the soil within the dripline shall be kept to a minimum.(2) If access is required to go through the TPZ of a protected tree, the area within the TPZ should be protected from compaction either with steel plates or with 4” of wood chip overlaid with plywood. 10. Any damage due to construction activities shall be reported to the project arborist or city arborist within 6 hours so that remedial action can be taken. 11. Ensure upon completion of the project that the original ground level is restored PC 09-13-2022 125 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 7 | Page Location of existing buildings, protected trees and their Tree Protection Zones PC 09-13-2022 126 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 8 | Page Location of proposed construction, protected trees and their Tree Protection Zones PC 09-13-2022 127 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 9 | Page Glossary Canopy The part of the crown composed of leaves and small twigs.(2) Cavities An open wound, characterized by the presence of extensive decay and resulting in a hollow.(1) Decay Process of degradation of woody tissues by fungi and bacteria through the decomposition of cellulose and lignin(1) Dripline The width of the crown as measured by the lateral extent of the foliage.(1) Genus A classification of plants showing similar characteristics. Root crown The point at which the trunk flares out at the base of the tree to become the root system. Species A Classification that identifies a particular plant. Standard Height at which the girth of the tree is measured. Typically 4 1/2 feet above height ground level References (1) Matheny, N.P., and Clark, J.P. Evaluation of Hazard Trees in Urban Areas. International Society of Arboriculture,1994. (2) Harris, R.W., Matheny, N.P. and Clark, J.R.. Arboriculture: Integrated Management of Landscape Trees, Shrubs and Vines. Prentice Hall, 1999. (3) Carlson, Russell E. Paulownia on The Green: An Assessment of Tree Health and Structural Condition. Tree Tech Consulting, 1998. (4) Extracted from a copy of Tree Protection guidelines. Anon (5) T. D. Sydnor, Arboricultural Glossary. School of Natural Resources, 2000 (6) D Dockter, Tree Technical Manual. City of Palo Alto, June, 2001 PC 09-13-2022 128 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 10 | Page Certification of Performance(3) I, Robert Weatherill certify: * That I have personally inspected the tree(s) and/or the property referred to in this report, and have stated my findings accurately. The extent of the evaluation and appraisal is stated in the attached report and the Terms and Conditions; * That I have no current or prospective interest in the vegetation or the property that is the subject of this report, and I have no personal interest or bias with respect to the parties involved; * That the analysis, opinions and conclusions stated herein are my own, and are based on current scientific procedures and facts; * That my compensation is not contingent upon the reporting of a predetermined conclusion that favors the cause of the client or any other party, nor upon the results of the assessment, the attainment of stipulated results, or the occurrence of any subsequent events; * That my analysis, opinions, and conclusions were developed and this report has been prepared according to commonly accepted Arboricultural practices; * That no one provided significant professional assistance to the consultant, except as indicated within the report. I further certify that I am a member of the International Society of Arboriculture and a Certified Arborist. I have been involved in the practice of arboriculture and the care and study of trees for over 20 years. Signed Robert Weatherill Certified Arborist WE 1936a Date: 5/25/21 PC 09-13-2022 129 of 439 Advanced Tree Care 20860 McLellan Rd., Cupertino 965 East San Carlos Ave, San Carlos May 25, 2021 ___________________________________________________________________________ 11 | Page Terms and Conditions(3) The following terms and conditions apply to all oral and written reports and correspondence pertaining to consultations, inspections and activities of Advanced Tree Care : 1. All property lines and ownership of property, trees, and landscape plants and fixtures are assumed to be accurate and reliable as presented and described to the consultant, either verbally or in writing. The consultant assumes no responsibility for verification of ownership or locations of property lines, or for results of any actions or recommendations based on inaccurate information. 2. It is assumed that any property referred to in any report or in conjunction with any services performed by Advanced Tree Care, is not in violation of any applicable codes, ordinances, statutes, or other governmental regulations, and that any titles and ownership to any property are assumed to be good and marketable. Any existing liens and encumbrances have been disregarded. 3. All reports and other correspondence are confidential, and are the property of Advanced Tree Care and it’s named clients and their assignees or agents. Possession of this report or a copy thereof does not imply any right of publication or use for any purpose, without the express permission of the consultant and the client to whom the report was issued. Loss, removal or alteration of any part of a report invalidates the entire appraisal/evaluation. 4. The scope of any report or other correspondence is limited to the trees and conditions specifically mentioned in those reports and correspondence. Advanced Tree Care and the consultant assume no liability for the failure of trees or parts of trees, either inspected or otherwise. The consultant assumes no responsibility to report on the condition of any tree or landscape feature not specifically requested by the named client. 5. All inspections are limited to visual examination of accessible parts, without dissection, excavation, probing, boring or other invasive procedures, unless otherwise noted in the report. No warrantee or guarantee is made, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the plants or the property will not occur in the future, from any cause. The consultant shall not be responsible for damages caused by any tree defects, and assumes no responsibility for the correction of defects or tree related problems. 6. The consultant shall not be required to provide further documentation, give testimony, be deposed, or attend court by reason of this appraisal/report unless subsequent contractual arrangements are made, including payment of additional fees for such services as described by the consultant or in the fee schedules or contract. 7. Advanced Tree Care has no warrantee, either expressed or implied, as to the suitability of the information contained in the reports for any purpose. It remains the responsibility of the client to determine applicability to his/her particular case. 8. Any report and the values, observations, and recommendations expressed therein represent the professional opinion of the consultants, and the fee for services is in no manner contingent upon the reporting of a specified value nor upon any particular finding to be reported. 9. Any photographs, diagrams, graphs, sketches, or other graphic material included in any report, being intended solely as visual aids, are not necessarily to scale and should not be construed as engineering reports or surveys, unless otherwise noted in the report. Any reproductions of graphs material or the work product of any other persons is intended solely for the purpose of clarification and ease of reference. Inclusion of said information does not constitute a representation by Advanced Tree Care or the consultant as to the sufficiency or accuracy of that information. PC 09-13-2022 130 of 439 Appendix B Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Modeling Results PC 09-13-2022 131 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Project Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual Project Characteristics - Land Use - ADUs were included in the single-family residential unit count as a conservative approach. Square footage was based on the site plan prepared for the proposed project. Construction Phase - Architectural coating phase assumed to begin two weeks after the initiation of building construction, and last for the same duration. Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO. Demolition - Based on information provided in the Phase I ESA prepared for the proposed project. 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking Structure 12.00 Space 0.11 2,497.00 0 Parking Lot 12.00 Space 0.11 4,800.00 0 Single Family Housing 12.00 Dwelling Unit 3.90 22,617.00 34 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 18.00 230.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 4,800.00 2,497.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 21,600.00 22,617.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 1 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 132 of 439 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 0.2511 1.5723 1.5694 2.7200e- 003 0.0938 0.0796 0.1734 0.0425 0.0748 0.1172 0.0000 236.3661 236.3661 0.0559 9.0000e- 004 238.0313 2023 0.1768 0.8434 0.9770 1.6500e- 003 4.0900e- 003 0.0412 0.0453 1.1000e- 003 0.0391 0.0402 0.0000 142.4146 142.4146 0.0302 3.8000e- 004 143.2843 Maximum 0.2511 1.5723 1.5694 2.7200e- 003 0.0938 0.0796 0.1734 0.0425 0.0748 0.1172 0.0000 236.3661 236.3661 0.0559 9.0000e- 004 238.0313 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 0.2511 1.5723 1.5694 2.7200e- 003 0.0938 0.0796 0.1734 0.0425 0.0748 0.1172 0.0000 236.3658 236.3658 0.0559 9.0000e- 004 238.0311 2023 0.1768 0.8434 0.9770 1.6500e- 003 4.0900e- 003 0.0412 0.0453 1.1000e- 003 0.0391 0.0402 0.0000 142.4144 142.4144 0.0302 3.8000e- 004 143.2841 Maximum 0.2511 1.5723 1.5694 2.7200e- 003 0.0938 0.0796 0.1734 0.0425 0.0748 0.1172 0.0000 236.3658 236.3658 0.0559 9.0000e- 004 238.0311 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 2 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 133 of 439 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 5-1-2022 7-31-2022 0.6985 0.6985 2 8-1-2022 10-31-2022 0.6731 0.6731 3 11-1-2022 1-31-2023 0.6566 0.6566 4 2-1-2023 4-30-2023 0.6032 0.6032 5 5-1-2023 7-31-2023 0.2110 0.2110 Highest 0.6985 0.6985 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.1783 2.5800e- 003 0.1922 2.2000e- 004 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 1.5253 0.5205 2.0458 3.0200e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.1474 Energy 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 34.7527 34.7527 2.1000e- 003 6.5000e- 004 34.9988 Mobile 0.0489 0.0554 0.4524 9.2000e- 004 0.0953 6.9000e- 004 0.0960 0.0255 6.4000e- 004 0.0261 0.0000 85.4158 85.4158 5.8100e- 003 4.2000e- 003 86.8135 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.8987 0.0000 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2480 0.5511 0.7991 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.6207 Total 0.2297 0.0793 0.6537 1.2800e- 003 0.0953 0.0178 0.1130 0.0255 0.0177 0.0432 4.6721 121.2400 125.9121 0.2078 5.5500e- 003 132.7619 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 3 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 134 of 439 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.1783 2.5800e- 003 0.1922 2.2000e- 004 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 1.5253 0.5205 2.0458 3.0200e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.1474 Energy 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 34.7527 34.7527 2.1000e- 003 6.5000e- 004 34.9988 Mobile 0.0489 0.0554 0.4524 9.2000e- 004 0.0953 6.9000e- 004 0.0960 0.0255 6.4000e- 004 0.0261 0.0000 85.4158 85.4158 5.8100e- 003 4.2000e- 003 86.8135 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.8987 0.0000 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.2480 0.5191 0.7672 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.5885 Total 0.2297 0.0793 0.6537 1.2800e- 003 0.0953 0.0178 0.1130 0.0255 0.0177 0.0432 4.6721 121.2081 125.8802 0.2078 5.5500e- 003 132.7297 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2022 5/27/2022 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/28/2022 6/3/2022 5 5 3 Grading Grading 6/4/2022 6/15/2022 5 8 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.02 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 4 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 135 of 439 4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/12/2022 5/29/2023 5 230 5 Paving Paving 6/16/2022 7/11/2022 5 18 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/26/2022 6/12/2023 5 230 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36 Residential Indoor: 45,799; Residential Outdoor: 15,266; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 438 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 8 Acres of Paving: 0.22 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 5 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 136 of 439 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.5900e- 003 0.0000 7.5900e- 003 1.1500e- 003 0.0000 1.1500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 004 0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e- 003 0.0000 34.2289 Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 004 7.5900e- 003 0.0124 0.0200 1.1500e- 003 0.0116 0.0127 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e- 003 0.0000 34.2289 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 70.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 7.00 2.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 6 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 137 of 439 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.6000e- 004 6.0300e- 003 1.2800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.1940 2.1940 7.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 2.2993 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.9533 0.9533 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.9622 Total 5.7000e- 004 6.3300e- 003 4.8700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.8400e- 003 4.8000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.1472 3.1472 1.0000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.2615 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.5900e- 003 0.0000 7.5900e- 003 1.1500e- 003 0.0000 1.1500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 004 0.0124 0.0124 0.0116 0.0116 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e- 003 0.0000 34.2289 Total 0.0264 0.2572 0.2059 3.9000e- 004 7.5900e- 003 0.0124 0.0200 1.1500e- 003 0.0116 0.0127 0.0000 33.9902 33.9902 9.5500e- 003 0.0000 34.2289 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 7 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 138 of 439 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.6000e- 004 6.0300e- 003 1.2800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 5.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.1940 2.1940 7.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 2.2993 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.5900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1900e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.9533 0.9533 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 0.9622 Total 5.7000e- 004 6.3300e- 003 4.8700e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.7800e- 003 6.0000e- 005 1.8400e- 003 4.8000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 5.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.1472 3.1472 1.0000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.2615 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0491 0.0000 0.0491 0.0253 0.0000 0.0253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.9300e- 003 0.0827 0.0492 1.0000e- 004 4.0300e- 003 4.0300e- 003 3.7100e- 003 3.7100e- 003 0.0000 8.3599 8.3599 2.7000e- 003 0.0000 8.4274 Total 7.9300e- 003 0.0827 0.0492 1.0000e- 004 0.0491 4.0300e- 003 0.0532 0.0253 3.7100e- 003 0.0290 0.0000 8.3599 8.3599 2.7000e- 003 0.0000 8.4274 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 8 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 139 of 439 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2887 Total 1.2000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2887 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0491 0.0000 0.0491 0.0253 0.0000 0.0253 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.9300e- 003 0.0827 0.0492 1.0000e- 004 4.0300e- 003 4.0300e- 003 3.7100e- 003 3.7100e- 003 0.0000 8.3598 8.3598 2.7000e- 003 0.0000 8.4274 Total 7.9300e- 003 0.0827 0.0492 1.0000e- 004 0.0491 4.0300e- 003 0.0532 0.0253 3.7100e- 003 0.0290 0.0000 8.3598 8.3598 2.7000e- 003 0.0000 8.4274 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 9 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 140 of 439 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.2000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2887 Total 1.2000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.2860 0.2860 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.2887 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0283 0.0000 0.0283 0.0137 0.0000 0.0137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.7900e- 003 0.0834 0.0611 1.2000e- 004 3.7600e- 003 3.7600e- 003 3.4600e- 003 3.4600e- 003 0.0000 10.4219 10.4219 3.3700e- 003 0.0000 10.5062 Total 7.7900e- 003 0.0834 0.0611 1.2000e- 004 0.0283 3.7600e- 003 0.0321 0.0137 3.4600e- 003 0.0172 0.0000 10.4219 10.4219 3.3700e- 003 0.0000 10.5062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 10 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 141 of 439 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.4300e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.3813 0.3813 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3849 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.4300e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.3813 0.3813 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3849 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0283 0.0000 0.0283 0.0137 0.0000 0.0137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 7.7900e- 003 0.0834 0.0611 1.2000e- 004 3.7600e- 003 3.7600e- 003 3.4600e- 003 3.4600e- 003 0.0000 10.4219 10.4219 3.3700e- 003 0.0000 10.5062 Total 7.7900e- 003 0.0834 0.0611 1.2000e- 004 0.0283 3.7600e- 003 0.0321 0.0137 3.4600e- 003 0.0172 0.0000 10.4219 10.4219 3.3700e- 003 0.0000 10.5062 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 11 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 142 of 439 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.4300e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.3813 0.3813 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3849 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 1.4300e- 003 0.0000 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.8000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.3813 0.3813 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3849 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1058 0.9682 1.0145 1.6700e- 003 0.0502 0.0502 0.0472 0.0472 0.0000 143.6697 143.6697 0.0344 0.0000 144.5301 Total 0.1058 0.9682 1.0145 1.6700e- 003 0.0502 0.0502 0.0472 0.0472 0.0000 143.6697 143.6697 0.0344 0.0000 144.5301 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 12 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 143 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.7000e- 004 6.9300e- 003 2.0200e- 003 3.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.5538 2.5538 6.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 2.6680 Worker 1.1900e- 003 8.6000e- 004 0.0104 3.0000e- 005 3.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4500e- 003 9.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.7581 2.7581 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.7840 Total 1.4600e- 003 7.7900e- 003 0.0124 6.0000e- 005 4.2400e- 003 9.0000e- 005 4.3300e- 003 1.1500e- 003 9.0000e- 005 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 5.3119 5.3119 1.5000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 5.4520 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.1058 0.9682 1.0145 1.6700e- 003 0.0502 0.0502 0.0472 0.0472 0.0000 143.6695 143.6695 0.0344 0.0000 144.5300 Total 0.1058 0.9682 1.0145 1.6700e- 003 0.0502 0.0502 0.0472 0.0472 0.0000 143.6695 143.6695 0.0344 0.0000 144.5300 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 13 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 144 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.7000e- 004 6.9300e- 003 2.0200e- 003 3.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 8.8000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.5538 2.5538 6.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 2.6680 Worker 1.1900e- 003 8.6000e- 004 0.0104 3.0000e- 005 3.4300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4500e- 003 9.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.7581 2.7581 9.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 2.7840 Total 1.4600e- 003 7.7900e- 003 0.0124 6.0000e- 005 4.2400e- 003 9.0000e- 005 4.3300e- 003 1.1500e- 003 9.0000e- 005 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 5.3119 5.3119 1.5000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 5.4520 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0834 0.7624 0.8609 1.4300e- 003 0.0371 0.0371 0.0349 0.0349 0.0000 122.8565 122.8565 0.0292 0.0000 123.5872 Total 0.0834 0.7624 0.8609 1.4300e- 003 0.0371 0.0371 0.0349 0.0349 0.0000 122.8565 122.8565 0.0292 0.0000 123.5872 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 14 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 145 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1000e- 004 4.7100e- 003 1.4700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.0924 2.0924 4.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 2.1857 Worker 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 8.2300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.9300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.9500e- 003 7.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.2976 2.2976 7.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 2.3180 Total 1.0600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 9.7000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 3.6300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 3.6700e- 003 9.8000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 4.3900 4.3900 1.1000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.5037 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0834 0.7624 0.8609 1.4300e- 003 0.0371 0.0371 0.0349 0.0349 0.0000 122.8564 122.8564 0.0292 0.0000 123.5870 Total 0.0834 0.7624 0.8609 1.4300e- 003 0.0371 0.0371 0.0349 0.0349 0.0000 122.8564 122.8564 0.0292 0.0000 123.5870 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 15 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 146 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 1.1000e- 004 4.7100e- 003 1.4700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 2.0924 2.0924 4.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 2.1857 Worker 9.5000e- 004 6.5000e- 004 8.2300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.9300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.9500e- 003 7.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.2976 2.2976 7.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 2.3180 Total 1.0600e- 003 5.3600e- 003 9.7000e- 003 4.0000e- 005 3.6300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 3.6700e- 003 9.8000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.0200e- 003 0.0000 4.3900 4.3900 1.1000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.5037 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 8.7900e- 003 0.0857 0.1098 1.7000e- 004 4.3900e- 003 4.3900e- 003 4.0500e- 003 4.0500e- 003 0.0000 14.7383 14.7383 4.6300e- 003 0.0000 14.8540 Paving 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.9300e- 003 0.0857 0.1098 1.7000e- 004 4.3900e- 003 4.3900e- 003 4.0500e- 003 4.0500e- 003 0.0000 14.7383 14.7383 4.6300e- 003 0.0000 14.8540 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 16 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 147 of 439 3.6 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.9000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 4.3000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.1439 1.1439 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.1547 Total 4.9000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 4.3000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.1439 1.1439 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.1547 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 8.7900e- 003 0.0857 0.1098 1.7000e- 004 4.3900e- 003 4.3900e- 003 4.0500e- 003 4.0500e- 003 0.0000 14.7383 14.7383 4.6300e- 003 0.0000 14.8540 Paving 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 8.9300e- 003 0.0857 0.1098 1.7000e- 004 4.3900e- 003 4.3900e- 003 4.0500e- 003 4.0500e- 003 0.0000 14.7383 14.7383 4.6300e- 003 0.0000 14.8540 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 17 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 148 of 439 3.6 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 4.9000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 4.3000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.1439 1.1439 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.1547 Total 4.9000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 4.3000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.1439 1.1439 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.1547 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0797 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0117 0.0803 0.1034 1.7000e- 004 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 0.0000 14.5536 14.5536 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 14.5772 Total 0.0913 0.0803 0.1034 1.7000e- 004 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 0.0000 14.5536 14.5536 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 14.5772 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 18 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 149 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3622 0.3622 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3656 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3622 0.3622 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3656 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0797 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0117 0.0803 0.1034 1.7000e- 004 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 0.0000 14.5535 14.5535 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 14.5772 Total 0.0913 0.0803 0.1034 1.7000e- 004 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 4.6600e- 003 0.0000 14.5535 14.5535 9.5000e- 004 0.0000 14.5772 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 19 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 150 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.6000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3622 0.3622 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3656 Total 1.6000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3622 0.3622 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3656 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0111 0.0756 0.1050 1.7000e- 004 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 14.8089 14.8089 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 14.8310 Total 0.0922 0.0756 0.1050 1.7000e- 004 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 14.8089 14.8089 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 14.8310 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 20 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 151 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3592 0.3592 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3624 Total 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3592 0.3592 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3624 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0811 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0111 0.0756 0.1050 1.7000e- 004 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 14.8089 14.8089 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 14.8310 Total 0.0922 0.0756 0.1050 1.7000e- 004 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 4.1100e- 003 0.0000 14.8089 14.8089 8.9000e- 004 0.0000 14.8310 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 21 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 152 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3592 0.3592 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3624 Total 1.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 4.6000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.3592 0.3592 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.3624 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 22 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 153 of 439 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.0489 0.0554 0.4524 9.2000e- 004 0.0953 6.9000e- 004 0.0960 0.0255 6.4000e- 004 0.0261 0.0000 85.4158 85.4158 5.8100e- 003 4.2000e- 003 86.8135 Unmitigated 0.0489 0.0554 0.4524 9.2000e- 004 0.0953 6.9000e- 004 0.0960 0.0255 6.4000e- 004 0.0261 0.0000 85.4158 85.4158 5.8100e- 003 4.2000e- 003 86.8135 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Single Family Housing 113.28 114.48 102.60 258,504 258,504 Total 113.28 114.48 102.60 258,504 258,504 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking Structure 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking Structure 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 Parking Lot 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 23 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 154 of 439 Single Family Housing 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.0403 10.0403 1.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 004 10.1395 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 10.0403 10.0403 1.6200e- 003 2.0000e- 004 10.1395 NaturalGas Mitigated 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 24.7124 24.7124 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 24.8593 NaturalGas Unmitigated 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 24.7124 24.7124 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 24.8593 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 24 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 155 of 439 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 463094 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 24.7124 24.7124 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 24.8593 Total 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 24.7124 24.7124 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 24.8593 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 25 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 156 of 439 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 463094 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 24.7124 24.7124 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 24.8593 Total 2.5000e- 003 0.0213 9.0800e- 003 1.4000e- 004 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 24.7124 24.7124 4.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 24.8593 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 26 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 157 of 439 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 13109.3 1.2129 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.2249 Parking Lot 1680 0.1554 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1570 Single Family Housing 93726.2 8.6719 1.4000e- 003 1.7000e- 004 8.7577 Total 10.0403 1.6300e- 003 1.9000e- 004 10.1395 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 27 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 158 of 439 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 13109.3 1.2129 2.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 1.2249 Parking Lot 1680 0.1554 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.1570 Single Family Housing 93726.2 8.6719 1.4000e- 003 1.7000e- 004 8.7577 Total 10.0403 1.6300e- 003 1.9000e- 004 10.1395 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 28 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 159 of 439 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.1783 2.5800e- 003 0.1922 2.2000e- 004 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 1.5253 0.5205 2.0458 3.0200e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.1474 Unmitigated 0.1783 2.5800e- 003 0.1922 2.2000e- 004 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 1.5253 0.5205 2.0458 3.0200e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.1474 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0888 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0707 1.5500e- 003 0.1029 2.1000e- 004 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 1.5253 0.3745 1.8999 2.8800e- 003 9.0000e- 005 1.9979 Landscaping 2.7100e- 003 1.0300e- 003 0.0893 0.0000 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.1460 0.1460 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.1495 Total 0.1783 2.5800e- 003 0.1922 2.1000e- 004 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 1.5253 0.5205 2.0458 3.0200e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.1474 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 29 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 160 of 439 Apply Water Conservation Strategy 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0161 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.0888 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.0707 1.5500e- 003 0.1029 2.1000e- 004 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 0.0148 1.5253 0.3745 1.8999 2.8800e- 003 9.0000e- 005 1.9979 Landscaping 2.7100e- 003 1.0300e- 003 0.0893 0.0000 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.1460 0.1460 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.1495 Total 0.1783 2.5800e- 003 0.1922 2.1000e- 004 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 0.0153 1.5253 0.5205 2.0458 3.0200e- 003 9.0000e- 005 2.1474 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 30 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 161 of 439 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 0.7672 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.5885 Unmitigated 0.7991 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.6207 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 0.781848 / 0.492904 0.7991 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.6207 Total 0.7991 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.6207 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 31 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 162 of 439 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 0.781848 / 0.394323 0.7672 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.5885 Total 0.7672 0.0256 6.1000e- 004 1.5885 Mitigated 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 32 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 163 of 439 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Unmitigated 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 14.28 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Total 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 33 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 164 of 439 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 14.28 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Total 2.8987 0.1713 0.0000 7.1814 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 34 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 165 of 439 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:25 AMPage 35 of 35 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Annual EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 166 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Project Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer Project Characteristics - Land Use - ADUs were included in the single-family residential unit count as a conservative approach. Square footage was based on the site plan prepared for the proposed project. Construction Phase - Architectural coating phase assumed to begin two weeks after the initiation of building construction, and last for the same duration. Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO. Demolition - Based on information provided in the Phase I ESA prepared for the proposed project. 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking Structure 12.00 Space 0.11 2,497.00 0 Parking Lot 12.00 Space 0.11 4,800.00 0 Single Family Housing 12.00 Dwelling Unit 3.90 22,617.00 34 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 18.00 230.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 4,800.00 2,497.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 21,600.00 22,617.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 1 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 167 of 439 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 3.3360 33.1151 21.1092 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,100.799 3 4,100.799 3 1.1958 0.0411 4,139.632 7 2023 3.1859 15.7861 18.2738 0.0309 0.0793 0.7714 0.8507 0.0213 0.7300 0.7514 0.0000 2,938.457 8 2,938.457 8 0.6271 7.8100e- 003 2,956.462 1 Maximum 3.3360 33.1151 21.1092 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,100.799 3 4,100.799 3 1.1958 0.0411 4,139.632 7 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 3.3360 33.1151 21.1092 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,100.799 3 4,100.799 3 1.1958 0.0411 4,139.632 7 2023 3.1859 15.7861 18.2738 0.0309 0.0793 0.7714 0.8507 0.0213 0.7300 0.7514 0.0000 2,938.457 8 2,938.457 8 0.6271 7.8100e- 003 2,956.462 1 Maximum 3.3360 33.1151 21.1092 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,100.799 3 4,100.799 3 1.1958 0.0411 4,139.632 7 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 2 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 168 of 439 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 3 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 169 of 439 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Energy 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Mobile 0.3058 0.2861 2.5371 5.4300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 557.8649 557.8649 0.0335 0.0247 566.0561 Total 13.3600 0.6539 19.6630 0.0365 0.5565 2.2931 2.8496 0.1482 2.2928 2.4410 244.5401 783.0351 1,027.575 1 0.3405 0.0447 1,049.397 9 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Energy 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Mobile 0.3058 0.2861 2.5371 5.4300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 557.8649 557.8649 0.0335 0.0247 566.0561 Total 13.3600 0.6539 19.6630 0.0365 0.5565 2.2931 2.8496 0.1482 2.2928 2.4410 244.5401 783.0351 1,027.575 1 0.3405 0.0447 1,049.397 9 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 4 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 170 of 439 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2022 5/27/2022 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/28/2022 6/3/2022 5 5 3 Grading Grading 6/4/2022 6/15/2022 5 8 4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/12/2022 5/29/2023 5 230 5 Paving Paving 6/16/2022 7/11/2022 5 18 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/26/2022 6/12/2023 5 230 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 45,799; Residential Outdoor: 15,266; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 438 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 8 Acres of Paving: 0.22 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 5 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 171 of 439 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 70.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 7.00 2.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 6 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 172 of 439 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7592 0.0000 0.7592 0.1150 0.0000 0.1150 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.7592 1.2427 2.0018 0.1150 1.1553 1.2702 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0165 0.5811 0.1274 2.2200e- 003 0.0612 5.4000e- 003 0.0666 0.0168 5.1700e- 003 0.0220 241.8087 241.8087 7.9800e- 003 0.0383 253.4210 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e- 003 2.8000e- 003 113.1197 Total 0.0601 0.6074 0.5151 3.3200e- 003 0.1844 6.0400e- 003 0.1905 0.0495 5.7600e- 003 0.0552 354.0182 354.0182 0.0110 0.0411 366.5407 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 7 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 173 of 439 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7592 0.0000 0.7592 0.1150 0.0000 0.1150 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.7592 1.2427 2.0018 0.1150 1.1553 1.2702 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0165 0.5811 0.1274 2.2200e- 003 0.0612 5.4000e- 003 0.0666 0.0168 5.1700e- 003 0.0220 241.8087 241.8087 7.9800e- 003 0.0383 253.4210 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e- 003 2.8000e- 003 113.1197 Total 0.0601 0.6074 0.5151 3.3200e- 003 0.1844 6.0400e- 003 0.1905 0.0495 5.7600e- 003 0.0552 354.0182 354.0182 0.0110 0.0411 366.5407 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 8 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 174 of 439 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0524 0.0316 0.4653 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 134.6513 134.6513 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 135.7437 Total 0.0524 0.0316 0.4653 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 134.6513 134.6513 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 135.7437 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 9 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 175 of 439 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0524 0.0316 0.4653 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 134.6513 134.6513 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 135.7437 Total 0.0524 0.0316 0.4653 1.3200e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 134.6513 134.6513 3.6700e- 003 3.3600e- 003 135.7437 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 10 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 176 of 439 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e- 003 2.8000e- 003 113.1197 Total 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e- 003 2.8000e- 003 113.1197 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 11 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 177 of 439 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e- 003 2.8000e- 003 113.1197 Total 0.0436 0.0263 0.3878 1.1000e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 112.2095 112.2095 3.0600e- 003 2.8000e- 003 113.1197 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 12 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 178 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.3100e- 003 0.1079 0.0321 4.2000e- 004 0.0135 1.1500e- 003 0.0147 3.9000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 5.0000e- 003 45.3972 45.3972 9.9000e- 004 6.7300e- 003 47.4264 Worker 0.0204 0.0123 0.1810 5.1000e- 004 0.0575 3.0000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.8000e- 004 0.0155 52.3644 52.3644 1.4300e- 003 1.3100e- 003 52.7892 Total 0.0247 0.1202 0.2130 9.3000e- 004 0.0710 1.4500e- 003 0.0725 0.0192 1.3800e- 003 0.0205 97.7616 97.7616 2.4200e- 003 8.0400e- 003 100.2156 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 13 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 179 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.3100e- 003 0.1079 0.0321 4.2000e- 004 0.0135 1.1500e- 003 0.0147 3.9000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 5.0000e- 003 45.3972 45.3972 9.9000e- 004 6.7300e- 003 47.4264 Worker 0.0204 0.0123 0.1810 5.1000e- 004 0.0575 3.0000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.8000e- 004 0.0155 52.3644 52.3644 1.4300e- 003 1.3100e- 003 52.7892 Total 0.0247 0.1202 0.2130 9.3000e- 004 0.0710 1.4500e- 003 0.0725 0.0192 1.3800e- 003 0.0205 97.7616 97.7616 2.4200e- 003 8.0400e- 003 100.2156 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 14 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 180 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1800e- 003 0.0858 0.0274 4.1000e- 004 0.0136 5.2000e- 004 0.0141 3.9000e- 003 5.0000e- 004 4.4000e- 003 43.4922 43.4922 8.9000e- 004 6.4300e- 003 45.4305 Worker 0.0189 0.0109 0.1673 5.0000e- 004 0.0575 2.9000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.6000e- 004 0.0155 51.0192 51.0192 1.2900e- 003 1.2100e- 003 51.4120 Total 0.0211 0.0967 0.1947 9.1000e- 004 0.0711 8.1000e- 004 0.0719 0.0192 7.6000e- 004 0.0199 94.5114 94.5114 2.1800e- 003 7.6400e- 003 96.8425 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 15 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 181 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1800e- 003 0.0858 0.0274 4.1000e- 004 0.0136 5.2000e- 004 0.0141 3.9000e- 003 5.0000e- 004 4.4000e- 003 43.4922 43.4922 8.9000e- 004 6.4300e- 003 45.4305 Worker 0.0189 0.0109 0.1673 5.0000e- 004 0.0575 2.9000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.6000e- 004 0.0155 51.0192 51.0192 1.2900e- 003 1.2100e- 003 51.4120 Total 0.0211 0.0967 0.1947 9.1000e- 004 0.0711 8.1000e- 004 0.0719 0.0192 7.6000e- 004 0.0199 94.5114 94.5114 2.1800e- 003 7.6400e- 003 96.8425 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 16 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 182 of 439 3.6 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9765 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Paving 0.0160 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9925 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0582 0.0351 0.5170 1.4700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 149.6126 149.6126 4.0800e- 003 3.7300e- 003 150.8263 Total 0.0582 0.0351 0.5170 1.4700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 149.6126 149.6126 4.0800e- 003 3.7300e- 003 150.8263 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 17 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 183 of 439 3.6 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9765 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 0.0000 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Paving 0.0160 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9925 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 0.0000 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0582 0.0351 0.5170 1.4700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 149.6126 149.6126 4.0800e- 003 3.7300e- 003 150.8263 Total 0.0582 0.0351 0.5170 1.4700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 149.6126 149.6126 4.0800e- 003 3.7300e- 003 150.8263 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 18 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 184 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.6022 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9100e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0259 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.4806 7.4806 2.0000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 7.5413 Total 2.9100e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0259 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.4806 7.4806 2.0000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 7.5413 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 19 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 185 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.6022 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9100e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0259 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.4806 7.4806 2.0000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 7.5413 Total 2.9100e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0259 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.4806 7.4806 2.0000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 7.5413 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 20 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 186 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 1.5893 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7000e- 003 1.5500e- 003 0.0239 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.2885 7.2885 1.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 7.3446 Total 2.7000e- 003 1.5500e- 003 0.0239 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.2885 7.2885 1.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 7.3446 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 21 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 187 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 1.5893 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7000e- 003 1.5500e- 003 0.0239 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.2885 7.2885 1.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 7.3446 Total 2.7000e- 003 1.5500e- 003 0.0239 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 7.2885 7.2885 1.8000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 7.3446 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 22 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 188 of 439 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.3058 0.2861 2.5371 5.4300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 557.8649 557.8649 0.0335 0.0247 566.0561 Unmitigated 0.3058 0.2861 2.5371 5.4300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 557.8649 557.8649 0.0335 0.0247 566.0561 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Single Family Housing 113.28 114.48 102.60 258,504 258,504 Total 113.28 114.48 102.60 258,504 258,504 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking Structure 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 23 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 189 of 439 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking Structure 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 Parking Lot 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 Single Family Housing 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 24 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 190 of 439 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 1268.75 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Total 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 25 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 191 of 439 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 1.26875 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Total 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 26 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 192 of 439 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Unmitigated 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.4866 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 12.4358 0.2395 16.0835 0.0303 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 244.5401 74.1177 318.6577 0.3024 0.0173 331.3590 Landscaping 0.0301 0.0114 0.9927 5.0000e- 005 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 1.7879 1.7879 1.7300e- 003 1.8311 Total 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 27 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 193 of 439 Apply Water Conservation Strategy 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.4866 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 12.4358 0.2395 16.0835 0.0303 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 244.5401 74.1177 318.6577 0.3024 0.0173 331.3590 Landscaping 0.0301 0.0114 0.9927 5.0000e- 005 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 1.7879 1.7879 1.7300e- 003 1.8311 Total 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 28 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 194 of 439 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:27 AMPage 29 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Summer EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 195 of 439 20860 McClellan Road Project Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter Project Characteristics - Land Use - ADUs were included in the single-family residential unit count as a conservative approach. Square footage was based on the site plan prepared for the proposed project. Construction Phase - Architectural coating phase assumed to begin two weeks after the initiation of building construction, and last for the same duration. Water Mitigation - Compliant with MWELO. Demolition - Based on information provided in the Phase I ESA prepared for the proposed project. 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking Structure 12.00 Space 0.11 2,497.00 0 Parking Lot 12.00 Space 0.11 4,800.00 0 Single Family Housing 12.00 Dwelling Unit 3.90 22,617.00 34 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 5 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 64 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Pacific Gas and Electric Company 2023Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 203.98 0.033CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.004N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 18.00 230.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 4,800.00 2,497.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 21,600.00 22,617.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 1 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 196 of 439 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 3.3365 33.1225 21.0933 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,092.904 3 4,092.904 3 1.1963 0.0415 4,131.878 2 2023 3.1864 15.7940 18.2666 0.0309 0.0793 0.7714 0.8507 0.0213 0.7300 0.7514 0.0000 2,934.387 0 2,934.387 0 0.6272 8.0400e- 003 2,952.463 4 Maximum 3.3365 33.1225 21.0933 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,092.904 3 4,092.904 3 1.1963 0.0415 4,131.878 2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 3.3365 33.1225 21.0933 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,092.904 3 4,092.904 3 1.1963 0.0415 4,131.878 2 2023 3.1864 15.7940 18.2666 0.0309 0.0793 0.7714 0.8507 0.0213 0.7300 0.7514 0.0000 2,934.387 0 2,934.387 0 0.6272 8.0400e- 003 2,952.463 4 Maximum 3.3365 33.1225 21.0933 0.0421 19.8049 1.6134 21.4182 10.1417 1.4843 11.6260 0.0000 4,092.904 3 4,092.904 3 1.1963 0.0415 4,131.878 2 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 2 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 197 of 439 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 3 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 198 of 439 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Energy 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Mobile 0.2759 0.3300 2.7121 5.1300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 526.6503 526.6503 0.0382 0.0271 535.6838 Total 13.3301 0.6978 19.8380 0.0362 0.5565 2.2931 2.8496 0.1482 2.2928 2.4410 244.5401 751.8205 996.3605 0.3451 0.0471 1,019.025 6 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Energy 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Mobile 0.2759 0.3300 2.7121 5.1300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 526.6503 526.6503 0.0382 0.0271 535.6838 Total 13.3301 0.6978 19.8380 0.0362 0.5565 2.2931 2.8496 0.1482 2.2928 2.4410 244.5401 751.8205 996.3605 0.3451 0.0471 1,019.025 6 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 4 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 199 of 439 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 5/1/2022 5/27/2022 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 5/28/2022 6/3/2022 5 5 3 Grading Grading 6/4/2022 6/15/2022 5 8 4 Building Construction Building Construction 7/12/2022 5/29/2023 5 230 5 Paving Paving 6/16/2022 7/11/2022 5 18 6 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/26/2022 6/12/2023 5 230 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Excavators 3 8.00 158 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 3 8.00 247 0.40 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 45,799; Residential Outdoor: 15,266; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 438 (Architectural Coating – sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 7.5 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 8 Acres of Paving: 0.22 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 5 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 200 of 439 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Grading Excavators 1 8.00 158 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 2 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 2 6.00 132 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 6.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 6 15.00 0.00 70.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 9 7.00 2.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 8 20.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 10.80 7.30 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 6 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 201 of 439 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7592 0.0000 0.7592 0.1150 0.0000 0.1150 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.7592 1.2427 2.0018 0.1150 1.1553 1.2702 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0161 0.6131 0.1294 2.2200e- 003 0.0612 5.4100e- 003 0.0666 0.0168 5.1800e- 003 0.0220 241.8873 241.8873 7.9600e- 003 0.0383 253.5035 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e- 003 3.2200e- 003 105.2827 Total 0.0607 0.6456 0.4993 3.2400e- 003 0.1844 6.0500e- 003 0.1905 0.0495 5.7700e- 003 0.0552 346.1231 346.1231 0.0114 0.0415 358.7861 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 7 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 202 of 439 3.2 Demolition - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.7592 0.0000 0.7592 0.1150 0.0000 0.1150 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 1.2427 1.2427 1.1553 1.1553 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Total 2.6392 25.7194 20.5941 0.0388 0.7592 1.2427 2.0018 0.1150 1.1553 1.2702 0.0000 3,746.781 2 3,746.781 2 1.0524 3,773.092 0 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0161 0.6131 0.1294 2.2200e- 003 0.0612 5.4100e- 003 0.0666 0.0168 5.1800e- 003 0.0220 241.8873 241.8873 7.9600e- 003 0.0383 253.5035 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e- 003 3.2200e- 003 105.2827 Total 0.0607 0.6456 0.4993 3.2400e- 003 0.1844 6.0500e- 003 0.1905 0.0495 5.7700e- 003 0.0552 346.1231 346.1231 0.0114 0.0415 358.7861 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 8 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 203 of 439 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0390 0.4438 1.2300e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 125.0830 125.0830 4.1600e- 003 3.8700e- 003 126.3392 Total 0.0535 0.0390 0.4438 1.2300e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 125.0830 125.0830 4.1600e- 003 3.8700e- 003 126.3392 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 9 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 204 of 439 3.3 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 19.6570 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 1.6126 1.6126 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Total 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 0.0380 19.6570 1.6126 21.2696 10.1025 1.4836 11.5860 0.0000 3,686.061 9 3,686.061 9 1.1922 3,715.865 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0535 0.0390 0.4438 1.2300e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 125.0830 125.0830 4.1600e- 003 3.8700e- 003 126.3392 Total 0.0535 0.0390 0.4438 1.2300e- 003 0.1479 7.7000e- 004 0.1486 0.0392 7.1000e- 004 0.0399 125.0830 125.0830 4.1600e- 003 3.8700e- 003 126.3392 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 10 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 205 of 439 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e- 003 3.2200e- 003 105.2827 Total 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e- 003 3.2200e- 003 105.2827 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 11 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 206 of 439 3.4 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 7.0826 0.0000 7.0826 3.4247 0.0000 3.4247 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 0.9409 0.9409 0.8656 0.8656 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Total 1.9486 20.8551 15.2727 0.0297 7.0826 0.9409 8.0234 3.4247 0.8656 4.2903 0.0000 2,872.046 4 2,872.046 4 0.9289 2,895.268 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e- 003 3.2200e- 003 105.2827 Total 0.0446 0.0325 0.3699 1.0200e- 003 0.1232 6.4000e- 004 0.1239 0.0327 5.9000e- 004 0.0333 104.2358 104.2358 3.4600e- 003 3.2200e- 003 105.2827 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 12 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 207 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2700e- 003 0.1138 0.0332 4.2000e- 004 0.0135 1.1500e- 003 0.0147 3.9000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 5.0000e- 003 45.4156 45.4156 9.8000e- 004 6.7400e- 003 47.4478 Worker 0.0208 0.0152 0.1726 4.8000e- 004 0.0575 3.0000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.8000e- 004 0.0155 48.6434 48.6434 1.6200e- 003 1.5000e- 003 49.1319 Total 0.0251 0.1289 0.2058 9.0000e- 004 0.0710 1.4500e- 003 0.0725 0.0192 1.3800e- 003 0.0205 94.0589 94.0589 2.6000e- 003 8.2400e- 003 96.5797 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 13 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 208 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 6 2,554.333 6 0.6120 2,569.632 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 4.2700e- 003 0.1138 0.0332 4.2000e- 004 0.0135 1.1500e- 003 0.0147 3.9000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 5.0000e- 003 45.4156 45.4156 9.8000e- 004 6.7400e- 003 47.4478 Worker 0.0208 0.0152 0.1726 4.8000e- 004 0.0575 3.0000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.8000e- 004 0.0155 48.6434 48.6434 1.6200e- 003 1.5000e- 003 49.1319 Total 0.0251 0.1289 0.2058 9.0000e- 004 0.0710 1.4500e- 003 0.0725 0.0192 1.3800e- 003 0.0205 94.0589 94.0589 2.6000e- 003 8.2400e- 003 96.5797 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 14 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 209 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1000e- 003 0.0908 0.0283 4.1000e- 004 0.0136 5.2000e- 004 0.0141 3.9000e- 003 5.0000e- 004 4.4000e- 003 43.5544 43.5544 8.8000e- 004 6.4500e- 003 45.4974 Worker 0.0194 0.0134 0.1603 4.6000e- 004 0.0575 2.9000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.6000e- 004 0.0155 47.4028 47.4028 1.4600e- 003 1.3900e- 003 47.8546 Total 0.0215 0.1042 0.1886 8.7000e- 004 0.0711 8.1000e- 004 0.0719 0.0192 7.6000e- 004 0.0199 90.9572 90.9572 2.3400e- 003 7.8400e- 003 93.3520 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 15 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 210 of 439 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 9 2,555.209 9 0.6079 2,570.406 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 2.1000e- 003 0.0908 0.0283 4.1000e- 004 0.0136 5.2000e- 004 0.0141 3.9000e- 003 5.0000e- 004 4.4000e- 003 43.5544 43.5544 8.8000e- 004 6.4500e- 003 45.4974 Worker 0.0194 0.0134 0.1603 4.6000e- 004 0.0575 2.9000e- 004 0.0578 0.0153 2.6000e- 004 0.0155 47.4028 47.4028 1.4600e- 003 1.3900e- 003 47.8546 Total 0.0215 0.1042 0.1886 8.7000e- 004 0.0711 8.1000e- 004 0.0719 0.0192 7.6000e- 004 0.0199 90.9572 90.9572 2.3400e- 003 7.8400e- 003 93.3520 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 16 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 211 of 439 3.6 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9765 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Paving 0.0160 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9925 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0594 0.0433 0.4932 1.3700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 138.9811 138.9811 4.6200e- 003 4.3000e- 003 140.3769 Total 0.0594 0.0433 0.4932 1.3700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 138.9811 138.9811 4.6200e- 003 4.3000e- 003 140.3769 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 17 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 212 of 439 3.6 Paving - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.9765 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 0.0000 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Paving 0.0160 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.9925 9.5221 12.1940 0.0189 0.4877 0.4877 0.4504 0.4504 0.0000 1,805.129 7 1,805.129 7 0.5672 1,819.309 1 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0594 0.0433 0.4932 1.3700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 138.9811 138.9811 4.6200e- 003 4.3000e- 003 140.3769 Total 0.0594 0.0433 0.4932 1.3700e- 003 0.1643 8.6000e- 004 0.1652 0.0436 7.9000e- 004 0.0444 138.9811 138.9811 4.6200e- 003 4.3000e- 003 140.3769 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 18 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 213 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.6022 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9700e- 003 2.1700e- 003 0.0247 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.9491 6.9491 2.3000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 7.0188 Total 2.9700e- 003 2.1700e- 003 0.0247 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.9491 6.9491 2.3000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 7.0188 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 19 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 214 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2045 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Total 1.6022 1.4085 1.8136 2.9700e- 003 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0817 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0183 281.9062 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.9700e- 003 2.1700e- 003 0.0247 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.9491 6.9491 2.3000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 7.0188 Total 2.9700e- 003 2.1700e- 003 0.0247 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.9491 6.9491 2.3000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 7.0188 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 20 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 215 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 1.5893 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7700e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.0229 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.7718 6.7718 2.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 6.8364 Total 2.7700e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.0229 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.7718 6.7718 2.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 6.8364 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 21 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 216 of 439 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 1.3977 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 1.5893 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.7700e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.0229 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.7718 6.7718 2.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 6.8364 Total 2.7700e- 003 1.9200e- 003 0.0229 7.0000e- 005 8.2100e- 003 4.0000e- 005 8.2600e- 003 2.1800e- 003 4.0000e- 005 2.2200e- 003 6.7718 6.7718 2.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 6.8364 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 22 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 217 of 439 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 0.2759 0.3300 2.7121 5.1300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 526.6503 526.6503 0.0382 0.0271 535.6838 Unmitigated 0.2759 0.3300 2.7121 5.1300e- 003 0.5565 3.8700e- 003 0.5603 0.1482 3.6000e- 003 0.1518 526.6503 526.6503 0.0382 0.0271 535.6838 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking Structure 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Single Family Housing 113.28 114.48 102.60 258,504 258,504 Total 113.28 114.48 102.60 258,504 258,504 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking Structure 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 9.50 7.30 7.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Single Family Housing 10.80 4.80 5.70 31.00 15.00 54.00 86 11 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 23 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 218 of 439 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Enclosed Parking Structure 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 Parking Lot 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 Single Family Housing 0.552821 0.058334 0.189005 0.121481 0.023262 0.005577 0.010166 0.007476 0.001000 0.000579 0.026545 0.000826 0.002928 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 24 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 219 of 439 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 1268.75 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Total 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 25 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 220 of 439 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking Structure 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Single Family Housing 1.26875 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Total 0.0137 0.1169 0.0498 7.5000e- 004 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 9.4500e- 003 149.2647 149.2647 2.8600e- 003 2.7400e- 003 150.1517 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 26 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 221 of 439 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Unmitigated 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.4866 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 12.4358 0.2395 16.0835 0.0303 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 244.5401 74.1177 318.6577 0.3024 0.0173 331.3590 Landscaping 0.0301 0.0114 0.9927 5.0000e- 005 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 1.7879 1.7879 1.7300e- 003 1.8311 Total 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 27 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 222 of 439 Apply Water Conservation Strategy 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.0881 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.4866 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 12.4358 0.2395 16.0835 0.0303 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 2.2743 244.5401 74.1177 318.6577 0.3024 0.0173 331.3590 Landscaping 0.0301 0.0114 0.9927 5.0000e- 005 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 5.4900e- 003 1.7879 1.7879 1.7300e- 003 1.8311 Total 13.0405 0.2509 17.0762 0.0303 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 2.2798 244.5401 75.9055 320.4456 0.3041 0.0173 333.1901 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 28 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 223 of 439 11.0 Vegetation 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 8.0 Waste Detail 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:31 AMPage 29 of 29 20860 McClellan Road Project - Bay Area AQMD Air District, Winter EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied PC 09-13-2022 224 of 439 Bay Area AQMD Air District, Mitigation Report Construction Mitigation Summary Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 OFFROAD Equipment Mitigation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 1 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 225 of 439 Equipment Type Fuel Type Tier Number Mitigated Total Number of Equipment DPF Oxidation Catalyst Air Compressors Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Cement and Mortar Mixers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00 Concrete/Industrial Saws Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Cranes Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Excavators Diesel No Change 0 4 No Change 0.00 Forklifts Diesel No Change 0 3 No Change 0.00 Generator Sets Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Graders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Pavers Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 Paving Equipment Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00 Rollers Diesel No Change 0 2 No Change 0.00 Rubber Tired Dozers Diesel No Change 0 6 No Change 0.00 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes Diesel No Change 0 11 No Change 0.00 Welders Diesel No Change 0 1 No Change 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 2 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 226 of 439 Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated tons/yr Unmitigated mt/yr Air Compressors 2.27700E-002 1.55860E-001 2.08420E-001 3.40000E-004 8.77000E-003 8.77000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.93624E+001 2.93624E+001 1.83000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.94083E+001 Cement and Mortar Mixers 7.90000E-004 4.97000E-003 4.16000E-003 1.00000E-005 1.90000E-004 1.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 6.18670E-001 6.18670E-001 6.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 6.20280E-001 Concrete/Industria l Saws 3.58000E-003 2.80100E-002 3.66500E-002 6.00000E-005 1.50000E-003 1.50000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.37656E+000 5.37656E+000 2.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.38390E+000 Cranes 3.65300E-002 4.03940E-001 1.87730E-001 5.80000E-004 1.68100E-002 1.54700E-002 0.00000E+000 5.10126E+001 5.10126E+001 1.65000E-002 0.00000E+000 5.14251E+001 Excavators 6.88000E-003 6.04200E-002 1.10670E-001 1.80000E-004 2.92000E-003 2.69000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.54226E+001 1.54226E+001 4.99000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.55473E+001 Forklifts 3.74300E-002 3.48800E-001 3.96620E-001 5.30000E-004 2.24300E-002 2.06300E-002 0.00000E+000 4.63305E+001 4.63305E+001 1.49800E-002 0.00000E+000 4.67051E+001 Generator Sets 3.66700E-002 3.25480E-001 4.22380E-001 7.60000E-004 1.59100E-002 1.59100E-002 0.00000E+000 6.49989E+001 6.49989E+001 2.98000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.50734E+001 Graders 1.66000E-003 2.10300E-002 6.89000E-003 3.00000E-005 6.70000E-004 6.20000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.32703E+000 2.32703E+000 7.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.34585E+000 Pavers 1.86000E-003 1.88900E-002 2.59600E-002 4.00000E-005 9.00000E-004 8.30000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.71703E+000 3.71703E+000 1.20000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.74708E+000 Paving Equipment 2.41000E-003 2.34600E-002 3.43700E-002 6.00000E-005 1.14000E-003 1.05000E-003 0.00000E+000 4.83105E+000 4.83105E+000 1.56000E-003 0.00000E+000 4.87011E+000 Rollers 2.24000E-003 2.33000E-002 2.51100E-002 4.00000E-005 1.34000E-003 1.24000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.11201E+000 3.11201E+000 1.01000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.13717E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 2.63700E-002 2.77000E-001 1.12830E-001 2.70000E-004 1.31500E-002 1.21000E-002 0.00000E+000 2.36336E+001 2.36336E+001 7.64000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.38247E+001 Tractors/Loaders/ Backhoes 5.29700E-002 5.38310E-001 7.44030E-001 1.04000E-003 2.80100E-002 2.57700E-002 0.00000E+000 9.10105E+001 9.10105E+001 2.94300E-002 0.00000E+000 9.17463E+001 Welders 3.06400E-002 1.65990E-001 1.94070E-001 2.90000E-004 6.88000E-003 6.88000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.16454E+001 2.16454E+001 2.48000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.17075E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 3 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 227 of 439 Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Mitigated tons/yr Mitigated mt/yr Air Compressors 2.27700E-002 1.55860E-001 2.08420E-001 3.40000E-004 8.77000E-003 8.77000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.93624E+001 2.93624E+001 1.83000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.94082E+001 Cement and Mortar Mixers 7.90000E-004 4.97000E-003 4.16000E-003 1.00000E-005 1.90000E-004 1.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 6.18670E-001 6.18670E-001 6.00000E-005 0.00000E+000 6.20280E-001 Concrete/Industrial Saws 3.58000E-003 2.80100E-002 3.66500E-002 6.00000E-005 1.50000E-003 1.50000E-003 0.00000E+000 5.37656E+000 5.37656E+000 2.90000E-004 0.00000E+000 5.38389E+000 Cranes 3.65300E-002 4.03940E-001 1.87730E-001 5.80000E-004 1.68100E-002 1.54700E-002 0.00000E+000 5.10126E+001 5.10126E+001 1.65000E-002 0.00000E+000 5.14250E+001 Excavators 6.88000E-003 6.04200E-002 1.10670E-001 1.80000E-004 2.92000E-003 2.69000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.54226E+001 1.54226E+001 4.99000E-003 0.00000E+000 1.55473E+001 Forklifts 3.74300E-002 3.48800E-001 3.96620E-001 5.30000E-004 2.24300E-002 2.06300E-002 0.00000E+000 4.63305E+001 4.63305E+001 1.49800E-002 0.00000E+000 4.67051E+001 Generator Sets 3.66700E-002 3.25480E-001 4.22380E-001 7.60000E-004 1.59100E-002 1.59100E-002 0.00000E+000 6.49988E+001 6.49988E+001 2.98000E-003 0.00000E+000 6.50734E+001 Graders 1.66000E-003 2.10300E-002 6.89000E-003 3.00000E-005 6.70000E-004 6.20000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.32703E+000 2.32703E+000 7.50000E-004 0.00000E+000 2.34585E+000 Pavers 1.86000E-003 1.88900E-002 2.59600E-002 4.00000E-005 9.00000E-004 8.30000E-004 0.00000E+000 3.71702E+000 3.71702E+000 1.20000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.74708E+000 Paving Equipment 2.41000E-003 2.34600E-002 3.43700E-002 6.00000E-005 1.14000E-003 1.05000E-003 0.00000E+000 4.83105E+000 4.83105E+000 1.56000E-003 0.00000E+000 4.87011E+000 Rollers 2.24000E-003 2.33000E-002 2.51100E-002 4.00000E-005 1.34000E-003 1.24000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.11200E+000 3.11200E+000 1.01000E-003 0.00000E+000 3.13717E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 2.63700E-002 2.77000E-001 1.12830E-001 2.70000E-004 1.31500E-002 1.21000E-002 0.00000E+000 2.36336E+001 2.36336E+001 7.64000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.38247E+001 Tractors/Loaders/Ba ckhoes 5.29700E-002 5.38310E-001 7.44030E-001 1.04000E-003 2.80100E-002 2.57700E-002 0.00000E+000 9.10104E+001 9.10104E+001 2.94300E-002 0.00000E+000 9.17462E+001 Welders 3.06400E-002 1.65990E-001 1.94070E-001 2.90000E-004 6.88000E-003 6.88000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.16454E+001 2.16454E+001 2.48000E-003 0.00000E+000 2.17075E+001 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 4 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 228 of 439 Equipment Type ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction Air Compressors 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.36229E-006 1.36229E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.36016E-006 Cement and Mortar Mixers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Concrete/Industrial Saws 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.85739E-006 Cranes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.17618E-006 1.17618E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.16675E-006 Excavators 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.29680E-006 1.29680E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.28640E-006 Forklifts 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.07920E-006 1.07920E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.28466E-006 Generator Sets 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.23079E-006 1.23079E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.07571E-006 Graders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Pavers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 2.69032E-006 2.69032E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Paving Equipment 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rollers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 3.21336E-006 3.21336E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 Rubber Tired Dozers 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.26938E-006 1.26938E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.25920E-006 Tractors/Loaders/Ba ckhoes 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.09877E-006 1.09877E-006 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.19896E-006 Welders 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 9.23985E-007 9.23985E-007 0.00000E+000 0.00000E+000 1.38201E-006 Fugitive Dust Mitigation Yes/No Mitigation InputMitigation InputMitigation InputMitigation Measure CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 5 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 229 of 439 No Soil Stabilizer for unpaved Roads PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction No Replace Ground Cover of Area Disturbed PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction No Water Exposed Area PM10 Reduction PM2.5 Reduction Frequency (per day) No Unpaved Road Mitigation Moisture Content % Vehicle Speed (mph) 0.00 No Clean Paved Road % PM Reduction 0.00 Unmitigated Mitigated Percent Reduction Phase Source PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 PM10 PM2.5 Architectural Coating Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Architectural Coating Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction Roads 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition Fugitive Dust 0.01 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Grading Fugitive Dust 0.03 0.01 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.00 Grading Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving Fugitive Dust 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Paving Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation Fugitive Dust 0.05 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.00 0.00 Site Preparation Roads 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 6 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 230 of 439 Operational Percent Reduction Summary Category ROG NOx CO SO2 Exhaust PM10 Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Percent Reduction Architectural Coating 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Consumer Products 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hearth 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Landscaping 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Mobile 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Natural Gas 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Water Indoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.79 3.99 0.04 0.00 1.99 Water Outdoor 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Operational Mobile Mitigation Mitigation Selected No No No No No Category Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use Land Use % Reduction 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.06 Input Value 1 0.25 Input Value 2 Input Value 3Measure Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Destination Accessibility Improve Walkability Design Increase Density Project Setting: CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 7 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 231 of 439 No No No No Neighborhood Enhancements Neighborhood Enhancements Neighborhood Enhancements Land Use Land Use 0.00 0.00 0.00 Implement NEV Network Provide Traffic Calming Measures Improve Pedestrian Network Land Use SubTotal Integrate Below Market Rate Housing No No No No No No Parking Policy Pricing Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Transit Improvements Parking Policy Pricing Parking Policy Pricing Parking Policy Pricing Neighborhood Enhancements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00Limit Parking Supply Land Use and Site Enhancement Subtotal Transit Improvements Subtotal Increase Transit Frequency Expand Transit Network Provide BRT System Parking Policy Pricing Subtotal On-street Market Pricing Unbundle Parking Costs Neighborhood Enhancements Subtotal No No No No No Commute Commute Commute Commute Commute 0.00 Transit Subsidy Encourage Telecommuting and Alternative Work Schedules Workplace Parking Charge Implement Employee Parking "Cash Out" Implement Trip Reduction Program CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 8 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 232 of 439 No No No No School Trip Commute Commute Commute Commute 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 Implement School Bus Program Commute Subtotal Provide Ride Sharing Program Employee Vanpool/Shuttle Market Commute Trip Reduction Option 0.00Total VMT Reduction Area Mitigation Measure Implemented No No No No No No No No No No Mitigation Measure No Hearth % Electric Chainsaw % Electric Leafblower % Electric Lawnmower Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Exterior) Use Low VOC Paint (Non-residential Interior) Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Exterior) Use Low VOC Paint (Residential Interior) Use Low VOC Cleaning Supplies Only Natural Gas Hearth Input Value 150.00 100.00 150.00 100.00 Energy Mitigation Measures No Use Low VOC Paint (Parking)150.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 9 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 233 of 439 Measure Implemented No No No Mitigation Measure Install High Efficiency Lighting On-site Renewable Exceed Title 24 Input Value 1 Input Value 2 Appliance Type Land Use Subtype % Improvement ClothWasher 30.00 DishWasher 15.00 Fan 50.00 Refrigerator 15.00 Water Mitigation Measures Measure Implemented No No Yes Mitigation Measure Use Reclaimed Water Use Grey Water Apply Water Conservation on Strategy Input Value 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 Input Value 2 No No No No Install low-flow bathroom faucet Install low-flow Toilet Install low-flow Shower Install low-flow Kitchen faucet 32.00 18.00 20.00 20.00 No No Turf Reduction Use Water Efficient Irrigation Systems 0.00 6.10 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 10 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 234 of 439 Solid Waste Mitigation Mitigation Measures Institute Recycling and Composting Services Percent Reduction in Waste Disposed Input Value No Water Efficient Landscape 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Date: 11/10/2021 11:32 AMPage 11 of 11 EMFAC Off-Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied 20860 McClellan Road Project PC 09-13-2022 235 of 439 Appendix C Preliminary Stormwater Analysis PC 09-13-2022 236 of 439 MH engineering Co. Page | 1 16075 Vineyard Blvd. Morgan Hill, CA 95037 (408) 779-7381 (408) 226-5712 Fax Preliminary Stormwater Analysis 20860 McClellan Road 6 lot Single Family Residential Development (APN 359-20-030) Cherryland Drive MHE 221047 August 05, 2021 Attachments: C.3 Impervious Surface Data Form Alternate Bio-retention basin sizing calculation Infiltration Feasibility Screening Worksheets Preliminary Grading , Drainage & Storm Water Management Plans (24x36) PC 09-13-2022 237 of 439 MH engineering Co. Page | 2 Project Description: This 1.25 acre parcel with two homes and a 215’x47’ barn is located at the southwest corner of McClellan Road and Cherryland Drive. Site currently lays in the southeasterly direction with average slopes under 1.5%. Project has proposed to develop 6 single family detached homes with driveway access off Cherryland Drive. This street will be widened to the ultimate 40 feet curb to curb width to include parking along the existing and proposed frontages. Property drains to Calabazas Creek, waters of San Francisco Bay, lies within Regional Water Quality Control Board, Region2. Low Impact Site Design Measures, Source Control Measures & Stormwater Treatment Measures: Project shall comply with City of Cupertino’s Municipal Code Section 9.18 (stormwater pollution prevention and watershed protection) and applicable subsections of Provisions C.3 of the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board’s Municipal Regional Permit (NPDES Permit) for Low Impact development. The total amount of impervious surface area replaced by the project exceeds 50% of the existing hardscape, therefore C.3 requirements are applicable to all new and replaced impervious surfaces. Project will create less than 1 acre of total impervious area as such hydromodification measures are not required. Site Design Measures Following design measures are incorporated into the site layout: impervious areas have been limited under the approved zoning hardscape is minimized within the scope of project grading has been optimized Source Control Measures: roof runoff is dispersed onto vegetated areas using splash blocks permeable pavement shall be used for all onsite driveways New widening of fronting Cherryland Drive shall also be C3 compliant permeable pavement to match existing street runoff from private hardscape will be generally directed onto vegetated areas Stormwater Treatment Measures (SCMs): Porous pavement has been proposed for the driveways and private street widening. Proposed 5’ sidewalk will drain onto the porous pavement. Each individual lot will have its own independent bio-retention basin. Roof and yard drainage will filter through landscaped areas to provide storm water pre-treatment before conveyance of that runoff is directed into the basins. Bio-retention basins have been sized per criteria listed in the C.3 Stormwater Handbook, Section 6.1 Bio-Retention Area design and sizing guidelines. Sizing is based on the 4% sizing factor derived from the flow based treatment standard of ‘runoff from 0.20 in/hr intensity rainfall. Typical basin shall have a maximum ponding depth of 9 inches with 24” soil media backfill placed over 18” drain rock bed. PC 09-13-2022 238 of 439 MH engineering Co. Page | 3 Project Soils study, dated Jan 19, 2021 (updated June 2021), relevant pages 1 and 8 are copied and pasted below indicate ‘Ksat’ for native soils at 3.0 in/hr across the site. This rate will allow the C.3 volume to infiltrate into native soil under 48 hours. An alternate calculation has also been provided to demonstrate that C.3 volume within the basins shall fully dissipate though percolation. This calculation sample is taken from the Cherryland development using 10 year rainfall intensity of 0.70 in for one hour duration. Cherryland calculations have incorrectly used a pervious area runoff coeff of 0.30 to size the basin. However, we have computed the composite ‘C’ value around 0.60. Based on the 4% rule basin sizing is as follows: Lot 1 10’x18’x0.75’ (ponding depth) Lot 2-4 10’x16.5’x0.75’ Lot 5 10’x17.5’x0.75’ Lot 6 8’x24’x0.75’ Hydro-modification/Peak Management: Project will create less than 1 acre of impervious surface, therefore peak management per City criteria is not required. SCM Layout Details and System Functionality: All SCMs are to be installed on private properties, which shall be owned and maintained by the individual homeowners. PC 09-13-2022 239 of 439 MH engineering Co. Page | 4 Infiltration Rates per Geotechnical Study: PC 09-13-2022 240 of 439 MH engineering Co. Page | 5 PC 09-13-2022 241 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 242 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 243 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 244 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 245 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 246 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 247 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 248 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 249 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 250 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 251 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 252 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 253 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 254 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 255 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 256 of 439 Surface Area Required (4% of 'IA' Rule)Surface Area Proposed1 7,7693,611178 180 9378 3.00 51 17.02 6,7352,870164 165 9347 3.00 51 17.03 6,7202,867164 165 9347 3.00 51 17.04 6,7392,774164 165 9347 3.00 51 17.05 7,4673,197175 175 9368 3.00 51 17.06 8,7304,038191 192 9403 3.00 51 17.0Infiltration duration (hours) "McClellan Site" Treatment Control Measure Sizing Above Ground Vol = Surface Area*Ponding Depth (9"); Below ground Vol=Surface Area*[Soil Media Depth*0.25+Drain Rock Depth*0.40]; Subgrade Vol= Surface Area*Ksat*1/12Bio-Retention Mitigation 985Above Surface Ponding depth (in)Total Vol Proposed (cf)Native Soil Ksat (in/hr)total ponding depth (in)4,770Roof & private Hardscape (sf)Yard Landscape & Bio-Retention (sf)4,4404,1054,1054,105DMA530Onsite Driveway Paved with Pervious Pavers (sf) 4,376718647560560 DMA Impervious Area 'IA'DMA Area Trib. to Bio-Retention (sf)L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\Drainage Study\221047 SCM Sizing Calcs.xlsPC 09-13-2022 257 of 439 8,581sf7,526 sf 7,532 sf 7,535 sf9,835sf 8,246sf Cherryland Drive (Existing Private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive(E) 25'(E) 10.5'14.5'Existing PUE, EAE, PIEE, PAE, PSDE & PSSE (E) 5'LE & PUEProposed 5' PUE & LEExisting PUE, EAE, PIEE, PAE, PSDE & PSSE Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 4,987sf Lot 7 (Proposed PUE, EAE, PIEE, PAE, PSDE & PSSE) Proposed 5' PUE & LE (S0°00'00"W)(301.76') Held Per R1 S0°02'48"E389.79'N89°56'35"E139.33'S0°00'00"W389.74'N89°55'16"E139.01'N89°59'57"E103.06'S90°00'00"E115.97'N90°00'00"W124.68'S90°00'00"E124.72'S90°00'00"E124.77'S0°00'00"W 42.35' S69°56'37"W 11.50' R = 37.00' Δ = 58°15'43" L = 37.62' R = 37.00' Δ = 10°43'27" L = 6.93' R = 56.00' Δ = 24°36'35" L = 24.05' R = 56.00' Δ = 13°48'13" L = 13.49' R = 15.00' Δ = 33°53'09" L = 8.87' 40.64'60.40'60.40'54.19' R = 15.00' Δ = 90°03'25" L = 23.58'109.82'N89°56'35"E149.86'(E)30' Street Dedication BDM not Found at Cherryland Dr Held Record Distance 57.97 per R2 Fd BDM held at 0.17' north per call on R2 M-M 884.93' (885.00' per R2) BDM per R2 SFNF Fd BDM per R1 (S90°00'00"E) (24.00')Per R1 N89°56'35"E 602.60' Held Record Distance 602.60' per R1 IP per R1 SFNF R1----161 M 44 R2----885 M 07 R3----Deed (Doc24414331)(132.75')Per R2Calc 149.86' (150.50' R3)(884.93')(N89°56'35"E)McClellan Place Fd Mon Box per R2 No Punch or ID Stelling Road Fd Mon Box per R2 No ID (N89°56'35"E)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C1-Tentative Map.dwg - 7/22/2021 2:40 PM - Plotted 7/22/2021 2:40 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO New; 221047 LO ExistingSHEET 221047 C1 5Tentative Map20860 McClellan RoadJuly 20211"=20'MFHSLICENSE D L A ND S U R VEYORHARIN D E R SI N GLAST A TE OF CA L IF O R NIANo. 8347 North SCALE: 1"=20'010203040NOTES: 20860 McClellan Road Cupertino, CA 95014 Robert M. Carlotto, Trustee Alok Ventures, LLC 725-01-018 Single Family Residential Single Family Residential R1-10 Zoning District R1-7.5 Zoining District Cupertino Sanitary District City of Cupertino San Jose Water Co. As Shown 54,244sf (1.245ac) None 4,987sf 49,257sf Street Address: Owner: Subdivider: Assessor's Parcel No: Existing Use: Proposed Use: Present Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Sewage Disposal: Storm Drainage: Source of Water: Existing Improvements: Gross Parcel Area: Public Street Dedication: Private Street Area: Net Area: LEGEND EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT PRIVATE INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT EAE PAE PUE PIEE PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT PRIVATE INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT PSDE PSSE PUE PIEE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LANDSCAPING EASEMENTLE Exterior Parcel Boundary New Lot Line Street Centerline Easement Line TENTATIVE MAP Being a Portion of the 10.56 acre tract of land in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 24, Township 7 South, Range 2, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian City of Cupertino, California Sheet Index: 1. Tentative Map 2. Site Topographic Map & Demo Plan 3. Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan 4. Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan 5. Preliminary Utility Plan Looking North Existing Pervious Pavement sawcut line Not to Scale(E) PL2% Permeable Pavers on Bedding Course and Stone Subbase per the Soils Engineer to match existing Street Section 5'P/L1.5-3.5% Street Section-Cherryland Drive Widening Curb & Gutter or full depth Vertical Curb & Sidewalk as shown on plan 14.5' CL (±8') 20' (10.5') 1.0-2.5%1.0-2.5% (5') (20') SITE Vicinity Map Assessor Parcel Map Basis of Bearings: Basis of bearings is along the centerline of McClellan Road as N89°56'35"E as shown on that certain Record of Survey Map filed for record in Book 173 of Maps at Page 54. PC 09-13-2022 258 of 439 X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)(e)(oh)(e)(oh)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(fh)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(ss)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(w)(w)(w)X(x)X(x)(ss)(ss)(ss)(sd)279.26 ep 279.38 ac dwy 279.66 ac dwy 279.63 ep 279.44 clf 279.68 fh 279.92 wv279.69 ep 279.34 ac dwy278.34 ac dwy 278.68 ep 278.79 di 279.38 ep 279.29 gb 279.51 ac dwy 280.64 clf278.67 ep 279.27 clf 278.86 ep 278.45 ac dwy 277.43 gdw 277.96 gdw 277.41 gdw 278.52 clf 278.38 gdw 278.48 clf 278.09 gdw 277.79 gdw 277.27 fl 277.81 gdw 277.46 gdw 0.00 fig 12 0.00 JP 0.00 JP 0.00 *jp 280.95 tc @ end 280.84 ep 280.61 ep 280.47 fnc ang 280.66 gas meter 280.59 sw 280.77 tstp 280.75 tstp 281.29 slb 281.32 slb 280.46 sw 280.38 sw 280.37 bw 280.16 tc 280.38 sw 279.72 fl 279.76 lip 280.40 dbl yellow 281.12 bw 280.90 tc @ dwy 280.45 fl 280.51 lip 281.52 piv 281.76 wm 281.55 wm 281.39 wm 281.05 tel mh 281.52 dbl yellow 281.77 bw 281.61 sw 281.46 sw281.48 tc @ dwy 281.15 tc @ dwy 281.03 fl 281.14 lip 281.04 lip 280.97 lip280.92 fl 281.68 ep 281.23 ep280.99 ep 280.73 ep 280.07 ep 281.62 tob 282.07 tob 281.36 tob 281.33 lo 12 280.75 cedar 11 280.88 cedar 12 280.81 lo 8 8 8 fork 281.16 ut 281.54 brdband can 281.44 tc @ dwy 281.84 tc @ dwy 282.13 bw 282.10 ac dwy 281.99 tc @ ci 281.38 fl 281.48 lip fl 282.31 slb 282.60 dbl yellow 282.01 flush curb282.10 flush curb 280.82 ug 280.77 ug 280.80 ug 280.75 ug 279.81 wm 281.15 uw281.09 uw 280.88 uw 281.14 uw 279.09 tc @ dwy 278.64 tc @ dwy 278.64 fl 278.68 lip 279.83 tc 278.75 co 278.04 fl 278.59 tc@ci, Inv271.44 278.68 ut 278.30 ssmh, Inv268.05thru, 268.30in 278.46 sdmh 278.12 tc @ ci 278.90 dbl yellow 278.14 dbl yellow 277.05 tc@ci, Inv272.75 279.24 poc trunk cedar 279.37 poc trunk cedar 279.38 poc trunk cedar 279.86 ng 279.74 sw 279.79 sw 279.48 brick wk 279.31 conc dwy279.09 conc dwy 278.99 pavers 278.84 cedar 19 279.13 poc trunk pine 279.82 poc trunk pine279.74 poc trunk pine 280.71 pine 24 281.18 pine 36 280.66 ep 280.53 ep 280.54 gate 280.77 end fnc 278.41 slb 278.49 gdw 278.68 ep 278.71 ep 278.71 ep 278.72 ep 278.61 ep 278.61 slb 278.50 ac dwy 278.63 ac dwy 279.37 ac dwy 279.28 ac dwy 278.56 ac dwy 278.44 ip 6" post 278.70 ip 6" post 278.77 ac dwy 279.20 ac dwy 279.55 ac dwy 279.94 ac dwy 279.92 ac dwy 279.46 ac dwy 278.58 ep 278.60 ep 278.39 ep 280.09 slb 280.07 slb 280.35 sw 280.39 sw 281.45 poc trunk cedar 281.31 poc trunk cedar 281.21 poc trunk cedar 279.45 slb 279.45 slb 279.50 elect. meter 279.22 co 279.09 slb 279.21 slb 279.53 slb 281.32 tstp 281.33 tstp 281.30 tstp 281.29 tstp 281.30 tstp 278.44 ac dwy 278.46 ac dwy 278.58 ac dwy 278.59 slb 278.58 ac dwy 278.12 ac dwy 277.62 ac dwy 277.71 ng 278.01 ng 279.19 slb 278.36 steel plate 11" dia 278.05 gdw 277.19 broken ac ep 277.47 broken ac ep 276.88 broken ac ep276.78 broken ac ep 277.04 inside fnc 276.01 inside fnc 276.22 broken ac ep 276.57 broken ac ep 276.61 ep 276.60 ep 276.13 inv 4" abs sd 276.39 sd cnc patc @ inside fnc 276.38 inside fnc 276.38 inside fnc cor 276.34 ep 276.33 ep 278.75 ng 279.40 clf 280.10 clf 278.69 tc @ end 278.40 ep 278.48 ep 278.60 clf 278.37 n side fnc jog s 1.5 to chlk fnc 278.83 cedar 13 9 276.87 ep 276.99 ep 276.50 ep 276.70 ep 276.67 ep 277.12 ng 277.42 tree 10 278.37 sp 277.38 tc bc 277.05 lip276.95 pavers 276.81 fl 276.88 flush curb 277.10 lip 276.90 fl 276.96 fl 276.96 lip276.89 fl 276.71 fl 276.72 lip 276.65 lip 276.70 tc 276.23 fl 276.29 lip 276.74 bw 276.68 sw 276.61 tc 276.14 fl 276.20 lip 276.42 ep 276.50 ep 276.82 tc 276.72 tc 276.99 dbl yellow 277.45 sdmh 277.17 bw 277.27 bw 277.34 bw 277.47 bw 278.60 tc 278.59 tc 278.12 fl 278.16 lip 278.16 pavers 276.99 pavers 277.47 tc 277.48 tc 276.97 pavers 277.73 tc @ dwy 277.26 tc @ dwy 277.28 tc @ dwy277.67 tc @ dwy 277.23 pavers 277.16 pavers 277.68 tc 277.75 tc 277.14 pavers 277.15 pavers 277.64 tc 277.66 tc @ end 277.66 brc 277.16 fl 277.16 lip 277.31 lip 277.72 brc 277.39 fl 277.44 fl 277.37 lip 277.79 brc 277.77 brc 277.82 tc 277.36 fl 277.36 lip277.32 tow @ fnc cont 20' +- 276.09 ng 277.70 fh 277.27 ssmh 277.24 wv 277.26 pavers 277.77 tc 276.59 ng 277.13 wv 277.12 pavers 277.75 tc 277.82 ng 278.43 wv Cherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny DriveN89°55'16"E139.01'S0°02'48"E389.79'N89°56'35"E139.33'S0°00'00"W389.74' (E) 8" Sewer (E) 6" Water (E) 24" Storm(E) 10" Sewer(E) 8" WaterAPN 359-20-030 (E) Barn and all other accessory structures to be demolished (E) House to be demolished (E) Garage to be demolished (E) ADU to be demolished (E) AC Driveway to be removed(E) Gravel Driveway to be removed (E) AC Driveway to be removed (E) AC Driveway to be removed (E) Drive Apron to be Plugged (E) Drive Apron to be Plugged All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C2-Topo Map & Demo Plan.dwg - 7/19/2021 6:45 PM - Plotted 7/19/2021 6:46 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO ExistingSHEET 221047 C2 5Site Topographic Map & Demo Plan20860 McClellan RoadMay 20211"=20'MFHSSTORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SD-1) SLOPE SECTION - DETAIL MONUMENT, TYPE AS SHOWN BENCH MARK STREET BARRICADE (A-32) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN FENCE, TYPE AS SHOWN DRIVEWAY APPROACH (A-8 & 9) CURB AND GUTTER DROP INLET (SD-4) CURB INLET (SD-5) SWALE REVISION W GAS (T) (E) (G) TELEPHONE ELECTRIC (W) (SS) (SD) DESCRIPTION (City Std Detail#) CENTER LINE PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING SHEET NO. BEG. VERTICAL CURVEBVC MAXIMUMMAX. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE PULL BOX REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SIDEWALK TEMPORARY BENCH MARK TOP OF CURB WATER METER WATER VALVE RIGHT OF WAY STANDARD POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION NATURAL GROUND EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT SW END VERTICAL CURVE FIRE HYDRANT FLOW LINE GRADE BREAK FINISH GRADE FINISH FLOOR END OF RETURN GB FH FG FL EVC (E) EX FF ER EXISTING WM WV TYP. TYPICAL TC TBM END OF CURVE DRIVEWAY DUCTILE IRON PIPE EXISTING GRADE ELECTROLIER DROP INLET CLEAN OUT CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CENTERLINE OF DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE CURB INLET CATCH BASIN BACK OF SIDEWALK CL D/W DI D.I.P. EC EG ELCT DWY CMP CO CB CI BW SSMH STD. SDMH R/W P.S.E. P.S.D.E. RCP PVI MIN. PB NG MINIMUM HIGH POINT GATE VALVE LOW POINT JOINT POLE ASPHALT CONCRETE BEGINNING OF CURVE BUILDING BC BLDG ABBREVIATIONS: AC INV. LP JP INVERT GV HP X X X X X SD SS LC LP (A-31) (2.1%)2.2% D 15 SD (SD) BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONBFE >> E STORM JUNCTION BOX HANDICAP RAMP (A-1 & A-5) North SCALE: 1"=20'010203040LICENSE D L A ND S U R VEYORHARIN D E R SI N GLAST A TE OF CA L IF O R NIANo. 8347 PC 09-13-2022 259 of 439 (sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDFF 279.35 Pad 278.52 FF 279.80 Pad 278.97 FF 280.20 Pad 279.37 FF 280.60 Pad 279.77 Cherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive(25')(10.5')(20')20'5'(5')(±8)'12" Bulkhead Retaining Wall below Fence @ Property Line (278.77)(279.26)(279.54)(279.77)(280.10)(280.38)(280.54) (281.45)(281.68) (277.20) (276.38) (276.04)(276.41) Min 6"-Max 27" CMU Retaining Wall @ Property Line Max 27" CMU Retaining Wall @ Property Line Pad 279.77 FF 280.60 (0.20'+0.67') FF=HP Swale + 10" Slab Section(281)(2 8 0 ) (280 ) (281 ) (279 )(277)(278)(278) (2 7 8 ) (2 7 9 )(280)(280)(279)(279)(277) (2 7 8 )(279)(279) (281)(282)(278)Typical Bio-Retention Basin Max. 9" Ponding Typ. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot Swale 280.16 tc 279.72 fl 279.76 lip 280.90 tc @ dwy 280.45 fl 280.51 lip 281.12 tc @ dwy 280.97 lip 280.92 fl 281.84 tc @ dwy tc @ ci 281.38 fl 279.09 tc @ dwy 278.64 fl 278.68 lip 278.27 lip 278.14 lip 278.02 fl 278.59 tc@ci, Inv271.44 277.05 tc@ci, Inv272.75 277.38 tc bc 277.05 lip 276.95 pavers 277.10 lip276.96 fl 276.96 lip 276.89 fl 276.71 fl277.17 tc poc 276.72 lip 276.70 tc 276.23 fl 276.29 lip 276.61 tc 276.14 fl 276.20 lip 277.35 hcr 278.59 tc 278.12 fl 278.16 lip 276.99 pavers 277.47 tc 277.48 tc 276.97 pavers 277.73 tc @ dwy 277.67 tc @ dwy 277.23 pavers 277.16 pavers 277.68 tc 277.75 tc 277.14 pavers 277.15 pavers 277.64 tc 277.66 tc @ end 277.66 brc 277.16 fl 277.16 lip 277.31 lip 277.72 brc 277.39 fl 277.44 fl 277.37 lip 277.79 brc 277.77 brc 277.82 tc 277.36 fl 277.36 lip 277.26 pavers 277.77 tc 277.12 pavers 277.75 tc (20') (30') Typ Roof Leader Splash Block S1 S1S2 S2HP Fl 2 7 8. 7 0 TW2 7 9. 0 0 TW2 7 9. 0 0 TW2 7 8. 6 3 FF 279.60 Pad 278.77 MOFG 278.90 Fl27 8. 4 2 Fl27 8. 4 2 Fl27 8. 3 7 hp Fl 2 7 8. 7 0 Fl27 8. 3 0 hp2 7 8. 7 0 TW2 7 9. 0 0 TW2 7 9. 0 0 (278.51) FF 279.43 Pad 278.60 Fl27 8. 2 2 HP Fl 2 7 8. 5 6 Fl27 8. 2 2 (279.04)(6" W all)(3" W all)(12" W all) TW2 7 9. 0 0 (22" W all)(27" W all)(24" W all)(27" W all)(6" W all)(6" W all)(3" W all)(6" W all)(3" W all) (E)FF 279.20± (E)Pad 277.20± (E)FF 278.70± (E)Pad 276.70± (E)FF 279.37± (E)Pad 277.37± 389.74'-1.4%-3.1%3.5%-4%Fl27 8. 6 7 Bottom 277.30 TW2 7 8. 0 0 Fl27 8. 0 0 Fl27 7. 1 4HP F l278 .47 Fl27 7. 5 8 HP Fl 2 7 8. 9 2 Fl27 7. 9 3 HP F l279 .32 H P F l 2 7 9 . 7 2 Fl27 8. 4 0 TW2 7 8. 3 0 (E) CI to be Replaced with a Manhole RIM 279.44 INV 271.44, 15"∅Out INV 271.44, 15"∅Out CI Grate 278.77 INV 273.20, 15"∅Out SDMH RIM 278.27 INV 274.25, 10"∅In INV 272.00, 15"∅In INV 272.00, 15"∅In INV 271.44, 15"∅Out (E) CI RIM 276.60 INV 272.75, 15"∅In CI Grate 276.54 INV 272.65, 10"∅Out (E)SDMH RIM 273.31 INV 271.00, 15"∅In 201' - 10"Ø HDP@ S=0.80% 30' - 15"Ø RCP @ S=4.04% (E) 15"Ø SD @ S=2.61% (E) 15"Ø SD @ S=1.48% Bottom 277.18 Bottom 277.65 Bottom 276.83 Bottom 276.39 Bottom 277.25 TW2 7 8. 6 3 Overflow Overflow Overflow Overflow Overflow Overflow Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 PROFILE: Grading Section S1 SCALE H: 1"=20' SCALE V: 1"=5' 277 278 279 280 281 282 277 278 279 280 281 282 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+32 Avg. 12" High (Max 27") CMU Retaining Wall @ Property Line Pad278.77 Pad278.60 Pad278.52 Pad278.97 Pad279.37 Pad279.77Lot 6 Lot 5 Lot 4 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 1 McClellan Road (30' R/W) (E)Pad279.0±Exterior BoundaryTypical Bulkhead Retainer at the bottom of Fence as needed @ Property Line PROFILE: Grading Section S2 SCALE H: 1"=20' SCALE V: 1"=5' 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+09 12" Bulkhead Retainer at the bottom of Fence @ Property Line Cherryland Drive (Private Street) Pad278.97 Lot 3 Parcel B APN359-20-043 (E)FF 279.2± (E)Pad 277.2± 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C3-Prelim Grading & Drainage Plan.dwg - 8/10/2021 1:16 PM - Plotted 8/10/2021 1:17 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO Existing; 221047 LO New; 221082 Arch 7-02-21SHEET 221047 C3 5Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan20860 McClellan RoadAug 20211"=20'MFHSHARIN D E R SI N GLAST A TE OF CA L IF O R NIAC49717 REGISTERED P R O F ESSIONAL E NGI NEER±13'14.5'North SCALE: 1"=20'010203040gff279.57gff279.40Looking North Existing Pervious Pavement sawcut line Not to Scale(E) PL2% Permeable Pavers on Bedding Course and Stone Subbase per the Soils Engineer to match existing Street Section 5'P/L1.5-3.5% Street Section-Cherryland Drive Widening Curb & Gutter or full depth Vertical Curb & Sidewalk as shown on plan 14.5' CL (±8') 20' (10.5') 1.0-2.5%1.0-2.5% (5') (20') PC 09-13-2022 260 of 439 (sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)276.82 city cup bd in mbox 281.35 Cross 278.96 Cross 279.63 pk 277.54 Spike 279.26 Spike 277.77 Mag Nail 277.70 ink x 276.66 fd bd in mbox SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD7,769sf6,739sf 6,720 sf 6,735 sfDMA-6 20'7,467sf Cherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive(25')(10.5')(20')20'5'(5')(±8)'(E) CI to be Replaced with a Manhole RIM 279.44 INV 271.44, 15"∅Out INV 271.44, 15"∅Out CI Grate 278.77 INV 273.20, 15"∅Out SDMH RIM 278.27 INV 274.25, 10"∅In INV 272.00, 15"∅In INV 272.00, 15"∅In INV 271.44, 15"∅Out (E) CI RIM 276.60 INV 272.75, 15"∅In CI Grate 276.54 INV 272.65, 10"∅Out (E)SDMH RIM 273.31 INV 271.00, 15"∅In 201' - 10"Ø HDP@ S=0.80% 30' - 15"Ø RCP @ S=4.04% (E) 15"Ø SD @ S=2.61% (E) 15"Ø SD @ S=1.48% 0' - 15"Ø RCP @ S=0.00% Building Setback Building SetbackBuilding Setback(281)(2 8 0 ) (280 ) (281 ) (279 )(277)(278)(278) (2 7 8 ) (2 7 9 )(280)(280)(279)(279)(277) (2 7 8 )(279)(279) (281)(282)(278)Typical Bio-Retention Basin Max. 9" Ponding Bottom 277.18 Bottom 277.65Bottom 276.83Bottom 276.39 Typ. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot Swale -0.91% -0.25% -0. 2 5 % -0.25%-0.67%-0.67% GbTc278.25Tc277.85Tc277.44LPTc277.04 GbTc276.96 PRC GbTc277.09 Tc277.40 280.16 tc 279.72 fl 279.76 lip 280.90 tc @ dwy 280.45 fl 280.51 lip 281.12 tc @ dwy 280.97 lip 280.92 fl 281.84 tc @ dwy tc @ ci 281.38 fl 278.64 fl 278.68 lip 278.27 lip 278.14 lip 278.02 fl 278.59 tc@ci, Inv271.44 277.05 tc@ci, Inv272.75 277.38 tc bc 277.05 lip 276.95 pavers 277.10 lip276.96 fl 276.96 lip 276.89 fl 276.71 fl277.17 tc poc 276.72 lip 276.70 tc 276.23 fl 276.29 lip 276.61 tc 276.14 fl 276.20 lip 277.35 hcr 278.16 lip 277.48 tc 276.97 pavers 277.73 tc @ dwy 277.67 tc @ dwy 277.23 pavers 277.68 tc 277.15 pavers 277.64 tc 277.66 tc @ end 277.66 brc 277.16 fl 277.16 lip 277.31 lip 277.72 brc 277.39 fl 277.44 fl 277.37 lip 277.79 brc 277.77 brc 277.82 tc 277.36 fl 277.36 lip (20') (30') Typ Roof Leader Splash Block Bottom 277.25 WS278.05 Bottom 277.30 7'9.34'10'18'10'10'16.5' 38.5'10'16.5'10'16.5' 17.5' WS278.00 WS277.14 WS277.58 WS277.93 WS278.40 Overflow Overflow Overflow Overflow Overflow Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 8,730sf DMA-5 DMA-4 DMA-3 DMA-2 DMA-1 5'1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C4-Prelim StormWater Management Plan.dwg - 8/10/2021 1:20 PM - Plotted 8/10/2021 1:20 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO Existing; 221047 LO New; 221082 Arch 7-02-21SHEET 221047 C4 5Prelim StormWater Management Plan20860 McClellan RoadAug 20211"=20'MFHSHARIN D E R SI N GLAST A TE OF CA L IF O R NIAC49717 REGISTERED P R O F ESSIONAL E NGI NEER±13'14.5'Vegetation per Landscape Plans) Engineered Bio-soil Planting Media Class 2 drain rockPonding Depth (Max. 9")Natural/Uncompacted Subgrade Scale: None Typical Bio-Retention Basin Detail Length Varies (see plan) 3" Mulch Layer 18"Min.North SCALE: 1"=20'01020304024"Min.Typical Planter/Retaining Curb Enclosure 12"3"FreeboardTyp.36" Overflow Weir Bio-Soil Level9"pondingScale: None Typical Downstream Elevation Width Varies (See Plan) Scale: None C.3 Compliant Permeable Pavement Section 3"FreeboardTyp.PC 09-13-2022 261 of 439 JTJT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JTSD SD SD SD SDSSSSSSSSSSSSWW W W W WCOCOCOCOCOCOCOE E E E E E SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD(e)(oh)(e)(oh)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(fh)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(ss)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(w)(w)(w)(ss)(ss)(ss)(sd)JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT276.82 city cup bd in mbox 281.35 Cross 278.96 Cross 279.63 pk 277.54 Spike 279.26 Spike 277.77 Mag Nail 277.70 ink x 276.66 fd bd in mbox LOT 2 PL-1PL-2R PL-3 PL-4 PL-2 PL-2 ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 Appx Loaction (E) Joint Trench Appx Location Proposed Joint Trench 3333 3 3 5 4 4 6 6 (E) 8" Sewer (E) 6" Water (E) 24" Storm(E) 10" Sewer(E) 8" WaterCherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5 Lot 6 87 Utility Improvement Notes City Standard 4"Ø Sewer Lateral City Standard 1"Ø Water Service Standard Electrical Service Existing Private Street Light Existing Fire Hydrant Proposed Private Street Light if Necessary Remove Existing Service Pole & Overhead to the House Relocate Existing Joint Pole behind new Curb & Gutter at a location approved by the City 1 2 3 5 4 6 8 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C5-Prelim Utility Plan.dwg - 8/5/2021 5:57 PM - Plotted 8/10/2021 1:21 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO New; 221047 LO Existing; 221082 Arch 7-02-21SHEET 221047 C5 5Preliminary Utility Plan20860 McClellan RoadAug 20211"=20'MFHSHARIN D E R SI N GLAST A TE OF CA L IF O R NIAC49717 REGISTERED P R O F ESSIONAL E NGI NEERPC 09-13-2022 262 of 439 DocuSign Envelope ID: F026237E-5D63-44B9-9FF9-7692C02CEC9E PC 09-13-2022 263 of 439 DocuSign Envelope ID: F026237E-5D63-44B9-9FF9-7692C02CEC9E PC 09-13-2022 264 of 439 From:Brianne Harkousha To:Suejane Han; Jennifer Chu, P.E. Cc:Cherryland Mynul; Cherryland 20852 Mei; Benjamin Fu Subject:RE: Cherryland Drive Date:Wednesday, July 27, 2022 7:56:00 AM Attachments:image001.png image002.png image003.png image004.png image005.png image006.png image007.png image008.png image009.png image010.png image011.png image012.png image013.png image014.png image015.png Suejane, Although the conceptual plan was approved as part of the Cherryland project, it is conceptual with the intent to show possible roadway layouts for a future development. It is not an approved plan for the current development project (TM-2021-006) and the property owner is not required to follow this conceptual street layout. The street layout on this conceptual plan is not binding to the owner on the west side as these agreements would be evaluated between the owners of the west and east side of Cherryland Drive. Furthermore, the development project is meeting Public Works standard requirements for minimum road and sidewalk widths with the current 14.5’. The items that you're requesting are private matters and may be brought to the applicants attention if you wish to discuss in detail or request them to make further modifications to the plans. You may also provide this information at the public hearing to voice your concerns. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Thanks, Brianne Harkousha​​ Associate Planner Community Development BrianneH@cupertino.org (408)777-7907 From: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 6:26 PM To: Jennifer Chu, P.E. <JenniferC@cupertino.org>; Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com>; PC 09-13-2022 265 of 439 Benjamin Fu <BenjaminF@cupertino.org> Subject: Re: Cherryland Drive CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Jennifer & Brianne, The conceptual plan was directed and signed by the City as part of the Cherryland development to facilitate the future development of the west adjacent lot. The purpose of 5’ landscape area on the conceptual plan is to avoid the conflict between two property owners. It’s a binding between the City and the Cherryland development. The developer of Cherryland project signed the CC&R of the Cherryland Cupertino HOA and has based on this signed conceptual plan. The existing 2.5’ landscape area is owned by Cherryland Cupertino HOA. The City chose to give this 2.5’ landscape area to the current developer free of charge without the permission from us. The Cherryland Drive is a private road. The adding of 6 new single houses and 6 ADUs from the current development will increase our annual insurance premium for the Cherryland Drive and the load on all utility lines and the road maintenance. The current developer will share the maintenance 6 out of 9 only. Most likely the current development will add 12 families (6 houses plus 6 ADUs) and minimum 18 cars on the future Cherryland community. We contribute more than 2/3 area of the future Cherryland Drive on the current development and we will incur the extra expense due to this development. It’s very unfair to us. The City broke the binding of this conceptual plan. We have no issue to provide the reciprocal access easement besides this 2.5’ landscape area. We need the approval from the City to amend the section 5.4 “No charge for the reciprocal access easement for the adjacent property” in the CC&R of Cherryland Cupertino HOA. The current developer is obligated to pay reasonable compensation for obtaining the reciprocal easement of this 2.5’ landscape area. Another way is to add 5’ landscape area on the current development per the conceptual plan. Thanks, Suejane From: Jennifer Chu, P.E. <JenniferC@cupertino.org> PC 09-13-2022 266 of 439 Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 5:56 PM To: Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org>; Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com>; Benjamin Fu <BenjaminF@cupertino.org> Subject: RE: Cherryland Drive Hi Suejane, My apologies for not responding sooner. Although the conceptual plan was approved as part of the Cherryland project, it is conceptual with the intent to show possible roadway layouts for a future development. It is not an approved plan for the current development project. The current development project is meeting Public Works standard requirements for minimum road and sidewalk widths with the current 14.5’. The additional 5’ planting strip (19.5’) adjacent to the new sidewalk is not required to be part of the roadway dedication for the private road. As mentioned previously, the project is providing a 5’ landscape easement adjacent to the new sidewalk for planting purposes. The existing 2.5’ landscape area that currently follows the western edge of Cherryland Dr will not remain as part of the fully developed and widened Cherryland Dr. If you would like to discuss further, please let me know and I would be happy to set up a call with Planning and Public Works. Jennifer Chu, P.E.​​ Senior Civil Engineer Public Works JenniferC@cupertino.org (408) 777-3237 From: Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 5, 2022 1:11 PM To: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com>; Jennifer Chu, P.E. <JenniferC@cupertino.org>; Benjamin Fu <BenjaminF@cupertino.org> Subject: RE: Cherryland Drive Suejane, Thank you for the clarification. I’ll review this with our Public Works Department and provide a response next week. Thanks, PC 09-13-2022 267 of 439 Brianne Harkousha​​ Associate Planner Community Development BrianneH@cupertino.org (408)777-7907 From: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2022 10:28 AM To: Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com>; Jennifer Chu, P.E. <JenniferC@cupertino.org>; Benjamin Fu <BenjaminF@cupertino.org> Subject: Re: Cherryland Drive CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Brianne, We are questioning the 5’ planting strip which is the landscape area in the signed conceptual layout and not the landscape easement. The landscape easement is in the private property. The 5’ planting strip is in the common area which should be in the future street layout. After the scheme two on the signed conceptual layout has been executed the scheme one need be executed as well per the signed conceptual layout. This conceptual layout was finalized by the community development department. Please see the item 4 in the attachment file 20840.062912. The 5’ planting strip consists of the 2.5’ landscape area on the most west Cherryland Drive and 2.5’ from the development of the lot on 20860 McClellan Road. The City can’t give this 5’ planting strip to the developer of the lot on 20860 McClellan Road without the permission from the owner of Cherryland Drive. The City doesn’t follow the signed conceptual layout. The planning director Ben is copied in this email. Thanks, Suejane PC 09-13-2022 268 of 439 From: Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 10:42 PM To: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com>; Jennifer Chu, P.E. <JenniferC@cupertino.org> Subject: RE: Cherryland Drive Suejane, I’ve copied our Public Works department if you wish to speak with them. I don’t believe we are disposing of any landscape easement areas. The plans you were referring too are conceptual and not the plans that are approved for the development of the easement areas. The previous email explained that and Public Works is included if there are additional items needed to clarify. Thanks, Brianne Harkousha​​ Associate Planner Community Development BrianneH@cupertino.org (408)777-7907 From: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2022 3:39 PM To: Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Cherryland Drive CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Brianne, These conceptual layouts were signed by City for avoiding the foreseeable arguments in the development of the lot on 20860 McClellan Road. We agree the 10’ dimension noted on the conceptual layouts is for a 5’ sidewalk and 5’ planting strip. This 5’ planting strip consists of the 2.5’ landscape area on the most west side of current Cherryland Drive and the 2.5’ from the development of the lot on 20860 McClellan Road. The City can’t dispose this proposed 5’ planting strip on the signed conceptual layouts. We request to implement this 5’ planting strip in the common area per PC 09-13-2022 269 of 439 the signed conceptual layout. Thanks, Suejane From: Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2022 4:51 PM To: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: Cherryland Drive Suejane, Please find response to your question from the Public Works Department: These are only conceptual layouts showing potential options for the future extension of the road. The current development project is required to meet the City’s standard curb-to-curb width for parking on both sides of the road, which is 36’ minimum for a cul-de-sac. They have provided a 40’ curb-to-curb width, consistent with the conceptual layouts. The 10’ dimension noted on the conceptual layouts would have been reserved for a 5’ sidewalk and 5’ planting strip, not additional parking. The development project has reserved the 5’ sidewalk within the roadway dedication and has provided a 5’ landscape easement for adjacent planting, which is consistent with what the Cherryland project also provided. Thanks, Brianne Harkousha​​ Associate Planner Community Development BrianneH@cupertino.org (408)777-7907 From: Brianne Harkousha Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 12:53 PM To: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: Cherryland Drive Suejane, This is a question for the Public Works Department. I’ve forwarded to our Public Works Department and will provide a response once I hear back. PC 09-13-2022 270 of 439 Thanks, Brianne Harkousha​​ Associate Planner Community Development BrianneH@cupertino.org (408)777-7907 From: Suejane Han <suejanehan@hotmail.com> Sent: Monday, June 27, 2022 12:33 PM To: Brianne Harkousha <BrianneH@cupertino.org> Cc: Cherryland Mynul <mynulhoda@gmail.com>; Cherryland 20852 Mei <jpiao1@yahoo.com> Subject: Cherryland Drive CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Brianne, We like to know the reason of the dedication of street width for the development of the lot on 20860 McClellan Road is not 19.5 feet. The Conceptual Street Layout for the future development is signed by City on 9/17/2013. When the width of sidewalk reduced from 10 feet to 5 feet the saved area should be retained in the private street. One of the possible use of this saved area is for the street parking. Thanks, Suejane PC 09-13-2022 271 of 439 TITLE SHEETA-0SHEET INDEXSCOPE OF WORKVICINITY MAPBUILDING ANALYSISENERGY CONSULTANTCONSUL. CIVIL ENGINEERSENGINEERS CONSULTING STRUCTURAL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE20860 McCLELLAN ROADCUPERTINO, CALIFORNIADEFERRED SUBMITTALSITEBUILDING CODESSITECONTACT INFORMATIONDISTRICT NEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESMcCLELLANDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN02-18-22CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANCHERRYLAND DR. MCCLELLAN PL MCCLELLAN ROADBONNY DR. STELLING ROAD PC 09-13-2022 272 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 273 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 274 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 275 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 276 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 277 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 278 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 279 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 280 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 281 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 282 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 283 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 284 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 285 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 286 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 287 of 439 GARAGE: 415 SFMAIN HOUSE: 2,085 SFADU: 563 SF.PLANTERPLANTEROUTDOOR PATIOUNCOVERED PATIOADUDINING ROOM KITCHEN FAMILY ROOMLIVING ROOMOFFICEFOYERBEDRM 4LAUPOWDERBATH 4FAU36" CABINETCOAT OVEN PANTRYA-2.1aFIRST FLOOR PLANNOTESFIRSTNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 1PC 09-13-2022 288 of 439 GARAGE: 415 SFMAIN HOUSE: 1,695 SFADU: 600 SF.DINING ROOM KITCHEN FAMILY ROOMLIVING ROOMOFFICEFOYERBEDRM 4LAUBEDRM 1 BEDRM 2 ADUGARAGE COATPOWDER BATH 4OVENPANTRY UNCOVERED PATIOWATER POND PLANTERA-2.1bFIRST FLOOR PLANNOTESFIRSTNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 2PC 09-13-2022 289 of 439 GARAGE: 415 SFMAIN HOUSE: 1,695 SFADU: 600 SF.DINING ROOM KITCHEN FAMILY ROOMLIVING ROOMOFFICEFOYERBEDRM 4LAUBEDRM 1 BEDRM 2 ADUGARAGE COATPOWDER BATH 4OVENPANTRY UNCOVERED PATIOWATER POND PLANTERA-2.1cFIRST FLOOR PLANNOTESFIRSTNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 3PC 09-13-2022 290 of 439 GARAGE: 415 SFMAIN HOUSE: 1,695 SFADU: 600 SF.DINING ROOM KITCHEN FAMILY ROOMLIVING ROOMOFFICEFOYERBEDRM 4LAUBEDRM 1 BEDRM 2 ADU GARAGECOAT POWDERBATH 4OVEN PANTRYUNCOVERED PATIOWATER PONDPLANTER A-2.1dFIRST FLOOR PLANNOTESFIRSTNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 4PC 09-13-2022 291 of 439 LIVING ROOMGARAGEFAMILY ROOMKITCHENLAUNDRYBEDROOM 5CLOSETDINING10 FT. CL.10 FT. CL.10 FT. CL.10 FT. CL.TV WALLPANTRY10 FT. CL.BATH 410 FT. CL.10 FT. CL.10'-6" CL.10 FT. CL.36" CABINET36" CABINETADUUNCOVERED PATIO36" CABINETPANTRYSHELVES A-2.1eFIRST FLOOR PLANNOTESFIRSTNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 5PC 09-13-2022 292 of 439 DINING ROOM KITCHENFAMILY ROOMLIVING ROOMJ. MASTERFOYERBEDRM 4PANTRYGARAGELAU.BATH 4BATH 5GARAGE: 415 SFMAIN HOUSE: 2,189 SFADUADU: 560 SFUNCOVERED PATIOA-2.1fFIRST FLOOR PLANNOTESFIRSTNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 6PC 09-13-2022 293 of 439 AREA: 1,327 SFOPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOWA-2.2aSECOND FLOOR PLANNOTESSECONDNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 1PC 09-13-2022 294 of 439 AREA: 1,275 SFOPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOWA-2.2bSECOND FLOOR PLANNOTESSECONDNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 2PC 09-13-2022 295 of 439 AREA: 1,275 SFOPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOWA-2.2cSECOND FLOOR PLANNOTESSECONDNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 3PC 09-13-2022 296 of 439 AREA: 1,275 SFOPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOWA-2.2dSECOND FLOOR PLANNOTESSECONDNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 4PC 09-13-2022 297 of 439 OFFICE/BEDRM 3HALLWAY9 FT. CL.9 FT. CL.BEDRM 49 FT. CL.M. BATH9 FT. CL.BATH 29 FT. CL.BATH 39 FT. CL.WICM. BEDRM9 FT. CL.AREA: 1,4529 FT. CL.BEDRM 29 FT. CL.A-2.2eSECOND FLOOR PLANNOTESSECONDNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 5PC 09-13-2022 298 of 439 AREA: 1,416OPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOWA-2.2fSECOND FLOOR PLANNOTESSECONDNOTESLEGENDSUNDERFLOOR VENT CALCULATIONDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANFLOOR PLANPLAN 6PC 09-13-2022 299 of 439 ELEVATIONSA-3.1aRIGHT ELEVATION - WESTKEYNOTESFRONT ELEVATION - NORTHDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 1PC 09-13-2022 300 of 439 121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.1bRIGHT ELEVATION - NORTHKEYNOTESFRONT ELEVATION - EASTDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 2PC 09-13-2022 301 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.1cRIGHT ELEVATION - NORTHKEYNOTESFRONT ELEVATION - EASTDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 3PC 09-13-2022 302 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.1dRIGHT ELEVATION - NORTHKEYNOTESFRONT ELEVATION - EASTDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 4PC 09-13-2022 303 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.1eRIGHT ELEVATION - NORTHKEYNOTESFRONT ELEVATION - EASTDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 5PC 09-13-2022 304 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.1fRIGHT ELEVATION - WESTKEYNOTESFRONT ELEVATION - NORTHDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 6PC 09-13-2022 305 of 439 ELEVATIONSA-3.2aLEFT ELEVATION - EASTKEYNOTESREAR ELEVATION - SOUTHDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 1PC 09-13-2022 306 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.2bREAR ELEVATION - WESTKEYNOTESLEFT ELEVATION - SOUTHDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 2PC 09-13-2022 307 of 439 ELEVATIONSA-3.2cREAR ELEVATION - WESTKEYNOTESLEFT ELEVATION - SOUTHDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 3PC 09-13-2022 308 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.2dREAR ELEVATION - WESTKEYNOTESLEFT ELEVATION - SOUTHDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 4PC 09-13-2022 309 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.2eREAR ELEVATION - WESTKEYNOTESLEFT ELEVATION - SOUTHDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 5PC 09-13-2022 310 of 439 121.5121.5ELEVATIONSA-3.2fKEYNOTESDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 6LEFT ELEVATION - EASTREAR ELEVATION - SOUTHPC 09-13-2022 311 of 439 RENDERINGA-3.3aRENDERINGDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 1PC 09-13-2022 312 of 439 RENDERINGA-3.3bRENDERINGDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 2PC 09-13-2022 313 of 439 RENDERINGA-3.3cRENDERINGDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 3PC 09-13-2022 314 of 439 RENDERINGA-3.3dRENDERINGDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 4PC 09-13-2022 315 of 439 RENDERINGA-3.3eRENDERINGDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 5PC 09-13-2022 316 of 439 RENDERINGA-3.3fRENDERINGDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 6PC 09-13-2022 317 of 439 OVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWBALCONY BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWSLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5:12SLOPE1.5:12SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"ROOF PLANROOF PLANA-4.0aATTIC VENT CALCULATIONROOF PLAN NOTESNOTESDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 1PC 09-13-2022 318 of 439 OVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOW BALCONY BELOWOVERHANG BELOWSLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE 1.5 :12 SLOPE 1.5 :12 SLOPE1.5 :12 SLOPE 1.5 :12 SLOPE 1.5 :12ROOF PLANROOF PLANA-4.0bATTIC VENT CALCULATIONROOF PLAN NOTESDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 2NOTESPC 09-13-2022 319 of 439 SLOPE1.5 :12OVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWBALCONY BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWSLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"ROOF PLANROOF PLANA-4.0cATTIC VENT CALCULATIONROOF PLAN NOTESDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 3NOTESPC 09-13-2022 320 of 439 OVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOW BALCONY BELOWOVERHANG BELOWSLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1.5 :12 SLOPE 1.5 :12 SLOPE 1.5 :12 SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12ROOF PLANROOF PLANA-4.0dATTIC VENT CALCULATIONROOF PLAN NOTESDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 4NOTESPC 09-13-2022 321 of 439 OVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOW BALCONY BELOW OVERHANG BELOW OVERHANG BELOWSLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE 1.5 : 12 SLOPE 1.5 :12 SLOPE 1.5 : 12 SLOPE 1.5 :12 SLOPE1.5 :12 SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"ROOF PLANROOF PLANA-4.0dATTIC VENT CALCULATIONROOF PLAN NOTESDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 4NOTESPC 09-13-2022 322 of 439 OVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWOVERHANG BELOWBALCONY BELOWSLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1.5 :12SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"SLOPE1/4"ROOF PLANROOF PLANA-4.0fATTIC VENT CALCULATIONROOF PLAN NOTESDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANPLAN 6NOTESPC 09-13-2022 323 of 439 1.5121.512SECTIONS A-AA-5.0ASECTION B-BSECTION A-ADESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANSECTIONS B-BPC 09-13-2022 324 of 439 121.5121.5KITCHENFAMILY ROOMHALL WAYMASTER BED RMOFFICEFOYERLIVING ROOMFAMILY ROOMSECTION A-ABED RMBATH RMSECTIONS A-AA-5.0bSECTION B-BSECTION A-ADESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANSECTIONS B-BPC 09-13-2022 325 of 439 KITCHENFAMILY ROOMBED ROOM1.5121.512FAMILY RM / KIT CHENLIVING RMFOYEROFFICEBED ROOMBATH RMSECTIONS A-AA-5.0cSECTION B-BSECTION A-ADESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANSECTIONS B-BPC 09-13-2022 326 of 439 121.5121.5KIT CHENFAMILY RMMASTER BED RMOFFICELIVING ROOMKITCHENBED ROOMBATH RMSECTIONS A-AA-5.0 DSECTION B-BSECTION A-ADESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANSECTIONS B-BPC 09-13-2022 327 of 439 1.5121.512MASTER BED ROOMKITCHENFAMILY RMHALL WAYFAMILY ROOMADU.BATH RM 4BED ROOM 5HALL WAY (MASTER BED ROOM)HALL WAY OFFICE / BEDROOM 3SECTIONS A-AA-5.0ESECTION B-BSECTION A-ADESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANSECTIONS B-BPC 09-13-2022 328 of 439 FAMILY ROOMKITCHENMASTER BED RMGARAGEFOYERLIVING RMFAMILY RMADU.BED ROOMBATH RMSECTIONS A-AA-5.0FSECTION B-BSECTION A-ADESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANSECTIONS B-BPC 09-13-2022 329 of 439 FIRST FLOOR LEVELSECOND FLOOR LEVELFLOOR AREA 1423.5 SF.FLOOR AREA 2276.5 SF.FLOOR AREA 3832 SF.FLOOR AREA 4745.5 SF.FLOOR AREA 5114.5 SF.FLOOR AREA 6643 SF.FLOOR AREA 7272 SF.FLOOR AREA 8412 SF.ADU FLOOR AREA 114.5 SF.ADUFLOOR AREA AC-1aCALCULATIONSDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANLOT 1PC 09-13-2022 330 of 439 FIRST FLOOR LEVELSECOND FLOOR LEVELFLOOR AREA 6614 SF.FLOOR AREA 7272 SF.FLOOR AREA 8389 SF.ADU FLOOR AREA 600 SF.ADUFLOOR AREA 1333 SF.FLOOR AREA 2510 SF.FLOOR AREA 3534 SF.FLOOR AREA 4631 SF.FLOOR AREA 5 103 SF.FLOOR AREA AC-1bCALCULATIONSDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANLOT 2PC 09-13-2022 331 of 439 FIRST FLOOR LEVELSECOND FLOOR LEVELFLOOR AREA 6614 SF.FLOOR AREA 7272 SF.FLOOR AREA 8389 SF.ADU FLOOR AREA 600 SF.ADUFLOOR AREA 1333 SF.FLOOR AREA 2510 SF.FLOOR AREA 3534 SF.FLOOR AREA 4631 SF.FLOOR AREA 5 103 SF.FLOOR AREA AC-1cCALCULATIONSDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANLOT 3PC 09-13-2022 332 of 439 FIRST FLOOR LEVELSECOND FLOOR LEVELFLOOR AREA 6614 SF.FLOOR AREA 7272 SF.FLOOR AREA 8389 SF.ADU FLOOR AREA 600 SF.ADUFLOOR AREA 1333 SF.FLOOR AREA 2510 SF.FLOOR AREA 3534 SF.FLOOR AREA 4631 SF.FLOOR AREA 5 103 SF.FLOOR AREA AC-1dCALCULATIONSDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANLOT 4PC 09-13-2022 333 of 439 FIRST FLOOR LEVELSECOND FLOOR LEVELFLOOR AREA 1819 SF.FLOOR AREA 2414.5 SF.FLOOR AREA 3468 SF.FLOOR AREA 4457.5 SF.FLOOR AREA 5 134 SF.FLOOR AREA 6411 SF.FLOOR AREA 7586 SF.FLOOR AREA 8455 SF.ADU FLOOR AREA 557 SF.ADUAREA: 1,452FLOOR AREA AC-1eCALCULATIONSDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANLOT 5PC 09-13-2022 334 of 439 FLOOR AREA 1783 SF.FLOOR AREA 2252 SF.FLOOR AREA 3568 SF.FLOOR AREA 4823 SF.FLOOR AREA 5183 SF.FLOOR AREA 4560 SF.FLOOR AREA 4648.5 SF.FLOOR AREA 4273 SF.FLOOR AREA 4494.5 SF.FIRST FLOOR LEVELADUSECOND FLOOR LEVELFLOOR AREA AC-1fCALCULATIONSDESIGN STUDIO408.375.0041SAN JOSE, CA 951354180 WATKINS WAYDATESCALEJOBSHEETREVISIONSSHEET CONTENTSDESIGN BY: CHAD NGUYEN2021AS SHOWN08-27-21CUPERTINO, CALIFORNIA 20860 McCLELLAN RD.DISTRICTNEW SINGLE FAMILY HOUSESDESIGN STUDIOPROJECTMcCLELLANLOT 4PC 09-13-2022 335 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 336 of 439 1 PROPOSED SITEPLAN - TRASH CAN TRAVEL PATH SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 40'-0" SHEET KEYNOTES NO.NOTE 101 SHADED AREA (E) ROAD TO BE EXTENDED 102 TRASH TRAVEL PATH 103 (E) BIKE LANE 104 TRASH CAN PLACEMENT 105 HOUSE TRASH CAN LOCATION (3 CANS PER HOUSE 32GAL, 64 GAL & 96 GAL) 20' FRONT SETBACK 12' SIDE SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK 15' FRONT SETBACK (SIDE GARAGE)5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK 7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK 20' FRONT SETBACK 20' FRONT SETBACK20' FRONT SETBACK 20' FRONT SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACKLOT 5 LOT 8291 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 4 LOT 7526 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 3 LOT 7532 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 2 LOT 7535 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 1 LOT 8571 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 6 LOT 9793 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU 60'+/- RAISED CURB MEDIAN 38'-93 4" TRASH CAN PLACEMENT 38'-93 4" TRASH PLACEMENT 6'-0" AS-102-ALT SITE PLAN - TRASH PATHSITE DEVELOPMENT- DAH DATE REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE CHECKED DRAWN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE PROJECT NUMBER 08-12-2021 APN: 359-20-03020860 MCCLELLAN RD CUPERTINO, CA 95014ALOK VENTURES LLC. 3230 WESTBRIDGE LN. PLEASENTON CA, 94566 1 PC 09-13-2022 337 of 439 18x241 PROPOSED SITEPLAN - TRASH CAN TRAVEL PATH SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" 20'-0" 20'-0" 40'-0" SHEET KEYNOTES NO.NOTE 101 SHADED AREA (E) ROAD TO BE EXTENDED 102 TRASH TRAVEL PATH 103 (E) BIKE LANE 104 TRASH CAN PLACEMENT 105 HOUSE TRASH CAN LOCATION 20' FRONT SETBACK 12' SIDE SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK 15' FRONT SETBACK (SIDE GARAGE)5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK 7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK20' BACK SETBACK 20' FRONT SETBACK 20' FRONT SETBACK20' FRONT SETBACK 20' FRONT SETBACK7.5' SIDE SETBACK5' SIDE SETBACKLOT 5 LOT 8291 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 4 LOT 7526 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 3 LOT 7532 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 2 LOT 7535 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 1 LOT 8571 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE LOT 6 LOT 9793 SQ. FT. 2 STORY HOUSE ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU 80'-0" TRASH CAN STAGING SITE DEVELOPMENT- DAH DATE REVISION NO.DESCRIPTION DATE CHECKED DRAWN SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE PROJECT NUMBER 08-12-2021 APN: 359-20-03020860 MCCLELLAN RD CUPERTINO, CA 95014ALOK VENTURES LLC. 3230 WESTBRIDGE LN. PLEASENTON CA, 94566 1 AS-102 SITE PLAN - TRASH PATH PC 09-13-2022 338 of 439 8,581sf7,526 sf 7,532 sf 7,535 sf9,615sf 8,469sf Cherryland Drive (Existing Private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive(E) 25'(E) 10.5'14.5'Existing PUE, EAE, PIEE, PAE, PSDE & PSSE (E) 5'LE & PUEProposed 5' PUE & LEExisting PUE, EAE, PIEE, PAE, PSDE & PSSE Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 4,987sf Lot 7 (Proposed PUE, EAE, PIEE, PAE, PSDE & PSSE) Proposed 5' PUE & LE (S0°00'00"W)(301.76') Held Per R1 S0°02'48"E389.79'N89°56'35"E139.33'S0°00'00"W389.74'N89°55'16"E139.01'N89°59'57"E98.16'S90°00'00"E115.97'N90°00'00"W124.68'S90°00'00"E124.72'S90°00'00"E124.77'R = 37.00' Δ = 21°19'00" L = 13.77' R = 56.00' Δ = 24°36'35" L = 24.05' R = 56.00' Δ = 13°48'13" L = 13.49' R = 15.00' Δ = 33°53'09" L = 8.87' 40.64'60.40'60.40'54.19' R = 15.00' Δ = 90°03'25" L = 23.58'109.82'N89°56'35"E149.86'(E)30' Street Dedication BDM not Found at Cherryland Dr Held Record Distance 57.97 per R2 Fd BDM held at 0.17' north per call on R2 M-M 884.93' (885.00' per R2) BDM per R2 SFNF Fd BDM per R1 (S90°00'00"E) (24.00')Per R1 N89°56'35"E 602.60' Held Record Distance 602.60' per R1 IP per R1 SFNF R1----161 M 44 R2----885 M 07 R3----Deed (Doc24414331)(132.75')Per R2Calc 149.86' (150.50' R3)(884.93')(E)20' PT&T Easement per Doc#3845350 62.15'76.76'61.00'60.40'60.40'69.08' 419.74' to Street C.L. (419.75' per Deed) 419.79' to Street C.L. (419.75' per Deed) N2 4 ° 2 4 ' 2 5 " E 43. 8 1 ' R = 37.00' Δ = 47°40'10" L = 30.78' 82.51' 39.15'60.40'60.40'69.18' R = 76.00' Δ = 19°10'59" L = 25.45' R = 57.00' L = 36.36'Total L = 61.81' R = 57.00' L = 38.12' Typical Lot Width at Front Setback Line R = 76.00' L = 23.96' Total L= 63.11'20'20' Typical Lot Width at Front Setback Line 4'PSDE 4'PSDE(N89°56'35"E)McClellan Place Fd Mon Box per R2 No Punch or ID Stelling Road Fd Mon Box per R2 No ID (N89°56'35"E)1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C1-Tentative Map.dwg - 4/26/2022 12:52 PM - Plotted 4/26/2022 12:52 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO New; 221047 LO ExistingSHEET 221047 C1 5Tentative Map20860 McClellan RoadApril 20221"=20'MFHSLICENSE D L A ND S U R VEYORHARIN D E R SI N GLAST ATE OF CA L IF O R NIANo. 8347 North SCALE: 1"=20'010203040NOTES: 20860 McClellan Road Cupertino, CA 95014 Robert M. Carlotto, Trustee Alok Ventures, LLC 725-01-018 Single Family Residential Single Family Residential R1-10 Zoning District R1-7.5 Zoining District Cupertino Sanitary District City of Cupertino San Jose Water Co. As Shown 54,244sf (1.245ac) None 4,987sf 49,257sf Street Address: Owner: Subdivider: Assessor's Parcel No: Existing Use: Proposed Use: Present Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Sewage Disposal: Storm Drainage: Source of Water: Existing Improvements: Gross Parcel Area: Public Street Dedication: Private Street Area: Net Area: LEGEND EMERGENCY ACCESS EASEMENT PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT PRIVATE INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT EAE PAE PUE PIEE PRIVATE STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT PRIVATE UTILITY EASEMENT PRIVATE INGRESS & EGRESS EASEMENT PSDE PSSE PUE PIEE PRIVATE SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT LANDSCAPING EASEMENTLE Exterior Parcel Boundary New Lot Line Street Centerline Easement Line TENTATIVE MAP Being a Portion of the 10.56 acre tract of land in the Northwest one-quarter of Section 24, Township 7 South, Range 2, Mount Diablo Base & Meridian City of Cupertino, California Sheet Index: 1. Tentative Map 2. Boundary & Topographic Map 3. Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan 4. Preliminary Storm Water Management Plan 5. Preliminary Utility Plan Looking North Existing Pervious Pavement sawcut line Not to Scale(E) PL2% Permeable Pavers on Bedding Course and Stone Subbase per the Soils Engineer to match existing Street Section 4'9"P/L1.5-3.5% Street Section-Cherryland Drive Widening Curb & Gutter or full depth Vertical Curb & Sidewalk as shown on plan CL (±8') 20.5' (10.5') 1.0-2.5%1.0-2.5% (5') (20') SITE Vicinity Map Assessor Parcel Map Basis of Bearings: Basis of bearings is along the centerline of McClellan Road as N89°56'35"E as shown on that certain Record of Survey Map filed for record in Book 173 of Maps at Page 54. 14.5' 3" 5"PUE & LE Typical lot width at building setback line PC 09-13-2022 339 of 439 X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)(e)(oh)(e)(oh)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(fh)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(ss)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(w)(w)(w)X(x)X(x)(ss)(ss)(ss)(sd)JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT>>>279.26 ep 279.38 ac dwy 279.66 ac dwy 279.63 ep 279.44 clf 279.68 fh 279.92 wv279.69 ep 279.34 ac dwy278.34 ac dwy 278.68 ep 278.79 di 279.38 ep 279.29 gb 279.51 ac dwy 280.64 clf278.67 ep 279.27 clf 278.86 ep 278.45 ac dwy 277.43 gdw 277.96 gdw 277.41 gdw 278.52 clf 278.38 gdw278.48 clf 278.09 gdw 277.79 gdw 277.27 fl 277.81 gdw 277.46 gdw 0.00 fig 12 280.95 tc @ end 280.84 ep 280.61 ep 280.47 fnc ang 280.59 sw 280.77 tstp 280.75 tstp 281.29 slb 281.32 slb 280.46 sw 280.38 sw 280.37 bw 280.16 tc 279.72 fl 279.76 lip 280.40 dbl yellow 281.12 bw 280.90 tc @ dwy 280.45 fl 280.51 lip 281.52 piv 281.76 wm 281.55 wm 281.39 wm 281.52 dbl yellow 281.77 bw 281.61 sw 281.46 sw281.48 tc @ dwy 281.15 tc @ dwy 281.03 fl 281.14 lip 281.04 lip 280.97 lip280.92 fl 281.68 ep 281.23 ep280.99 ep 280.73 ep 280.07 ep 281.62 tob 282.07 tob 281.36 tob 281.33 lo 12 280.75 cedar 11 280.88 cedar 12 280.81 lo 8 8 8 fork 281.44 tc @ dwy 281.84 tc @ dwy 282.13 bw 282.10 ac dwy 281.99 tc @ ci 281.38 fl 281.48 lip fl 282.31 slb 282.60 dbl yellow 282.01 flush curb 282.10 flush curb 279.81 wm 281.15 uw281.09 uw 280.88 uw 281.14 uw 279.09 tc @ dwy 278.64 tc @ dwy 278.64 fl 278.68 lip 279.83 tc 278.75 co 278.04 fl 278.59 tc@ci, Inv271.44 278.30 ssmh, Inv268.05thru, 268.30in 278.46 sdmh 278.12 tc @ ci 278.90 dbl yellow 278.14 dbl yellow 277.05 tc@ci, Inv272.75 279.24 poc trunk cedar 279.37 poc trunk cedar 279.38 poc trunk cedar 279.86 ng 279.74 sw 279.79 sw 279.48 brick wk 279.31 conc dwy279.09 conc dwy 278.99 pavers 278.84 cedar 19 279.13 poc trunk pine 279.82 poc trunk pine279.74 poc trunk pine 280.71 pine 24 281.18 pine 36 280.66 ep 280.53 ep 280.54 gate 280.77 end fnc 278.41 slb 278.49 gdw 278.68 ep 278.71 ep 278.71 ep 278.72 ep 278.61 ep 278.61 slb 278.50 ac dwy 278.63 ac dwy 279.37 ac dwy 279.28 ac dwy 278.56 ac dwy 278.44 ip 6" post 278.70 ip 6" post 278.77 ac dwy 279.20 ac dwy 279.55 ac dwy 279.94 ac dwy 279.92 ac dwy 279.46 ac dwy 278.58 ep 278.60 ep 278.39 ep 280.09 slb 280.07 slb 280.35 sw 280.39 sw 281.45 poc trunk cedar 281.31 poc trunk cedar 281.21 poc trunk cedar 279.45 slb 279.45 slb 279.22 co 279.09 slb 279.21 slb 279.53 slb 281.32 tstp 281.33 tstp 281.30 tstp 281.29 tstp 281.30 tstp 278.44 ac dwy 278.46 ac dwy 278.58 ac dwy 278.59 slb 278.58 ac dwy 278.12 ac dwy 277.62 ac dwy 277.71 ng 278.01 ng 279.19 slb 278.05 gdw 277.19 broken ac ep 277.47 broken ac ep 276.88 broken ac ep276.78 broken ac ep 277.04 inside fnc 276.01 inside fnc 276.22 broken ac ep 276.57 broken ac ep 276.61 ep 276.60 ep 276.13 inv 4" abs sd 276.39 sd cnc patc @ inside fnc 276.38 inside fnc 276.38 inside fnc cor 276.34 ep 276.33 ep 278.75 ng 279.40 clf 280.10 clf 278.69 tc @ end 278.40 ep 278.48 ep 278.60 clf 278.37 n side fnc jog s 1.5 to chlk fnc 278.83 cedar 13 9 276.87 ep 276.99 ep 276.50 ep 276.70 ep 276.67 ep 277.12 ng 277.42 tree 10 277.38 tc bc 277.05 lip276.95 pavers 276.81 fl 277.10 lip 276.90 fl 276.96 fl 276.96 lip276.89 fl 276.71 fl 276.72 lip 276.65 lip 276.70 tc 276.29 lip 276.74 bw 276.61 tc 276.14 fl 276.20 lip 276.42 ep 276.99 dbl yellow 277.45 sdmh 277.17 bw 277.27 bw 277.34 bw 277.47 bw 278.60 tc 278.59 tc 278.12 fl 278.16 lip 278.16 pavers 276.99 pavers 277.47 tc 277.48 tc 276.97 pavers 277.73 tc @ dwy 277.26 tc @ dwy 277.28 tc @ dwy277.67 tc @ dwy 277.23 pavers 277.16 pavers 277.68 tc 277.75 tc 277.14 pavers 277.15 pavers 277.64 tc 277.66 tc @ end 277.66 brc 277.16 fl 277.16 lip 277.31 lip 277.72 brc 277.39 fl 277.44 fl 277.37 lip 277.79 brc 277.77 brc 277.82 tc 277.36 fl 277.36 lip277.32 tow @ fnc cont 20' +- 276.09 ng 277.70 fh 277.27 ssmh 277.24 wv 277.26 pavers 277.77 tc 276.59 ng 277.13 wv 277.12 pavers 277.75 tc 277.82 ng 278.43 wv Cherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny DriveN89°55'16"E139.01'S0°02'48"E389.79'N89°56'35"E139.33'S0°00'00"W389.74' (E) 8" Sewer (E) 6" Water (E) 24" Storm(E) 10" Sewer(E) 8" Water(E) Barn and all other accessory structures to be demolished (E) House to be demolished (E) Garage to be demolished (E) ADU to be demolished (E) AC Driveway to be removed(E) Gravel Driveway to be removed (E) AC Driveway to be removed (E) AC Driveway to be removed (E) Drive Apron to be Plugged (E) Drive Apron to be Removed & Replaced with new C&G per City Std. Detail 1-16 All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished BDM not Found at Cherryland Dr Fd BDM held at 0.17' north per call on R2 BDM per R2 SFNF Fd BDM (E) Raised Curb Median 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C2-Topo Map & Demo Plan.dwg - 3/17/2022 5:35 PM - Plotted 4/19/2022 2:45 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO ExistingSHEET 221047 C2 5Boundary & Topographic Survey20860 McClellan RoadApril 20221"=20'MFHSSTORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SD-1) SLOPE SECTION - DETAIL MONUMENT, TYPE AS SHOWN BENCH MARK STREET BARRICADE (A-32) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN FENCE, TYPE AS SHOWN DRIVEWAY APPROACH (A-8 & 9) CURB AND GUTTER DROP INLET (SD-4) CURB INLET (SD-5) SWALE REVISION W GAS (T) (E) (G) TELEPHONE ELECTRIC (W) (SS) (SD) DESCRIPTION (City Std Detail#) CENTER LINE PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING SHEET NO. BEG. VERTICAL CURVEBVC MAXIMUMMAX. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE PULL BOX REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SIDEWALK TEMPORARY BENCH MARK TOP OF CURB WATER METER WATER VALVE RIGHT OF WAY STANDARD POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION NATURAL GROUND EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT SW END VERTICAL CURVE FIRE HYDRANT FLOW LINE GRADE BREAK FINISH GRADE FINISH FLOOR END OF RETURN GB FH FG FL EVC (E) EX FF ER EXISTING WM WV TYP. TYPICAL TC TBM END OF CURVE DRIVEWAY DUCTILE IRON PIPE EXISTING GRADE ELECTROLIER DROP INLET CLEAN OUT CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CENTERLINE OF DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE CURB INLET CATCH BASIN BACK OF SIDEWALK CL D/W DI D.I.P. EC EG ELCT DWY CMP CO CB CI BW SSMH STD. SDMH R/W P.S.E. P.S.D.E. RCP PVI MIN. PB NG MINIMUM HIGH POINT GATE VALVE LOW POINT JOINT POLE ASPHALT CONCRETE BEGINNING OF CURVE BUILDING BC BLDG ABBREVIATIONS: AC INV. LP JP INVERT GV HP X X X X X SD SS LC LP (A-31) (2.1%)2.2% D 15 SD (SD) BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONBFE >> E STORM JUNCTION BOX HANDICAP RAMP (A-1 & A-5) North SCALE: 1"=20'010203040LICENSE D L A ND S U R VEYORHARIN D E R SI N GLAST ATE OF CA L IF O R NIANo. 8347 Basis of Bearings: Basis of bearings is along the centerline of McClellan Road as N89°56'35"E as shown on that certain Record of Survey Map filed for record in Book 173 of Maps at Page 54. PC 09-13-2022 340 of 439 X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X(x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)X (x)(e)(oh)(e)(oh)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(fh)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(ss)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(w)(w)(w)X(x)X(x)(ss)(ss)(ss)(sd)279.26 ep 279.38 ac dwy 279.66 ac dwy 279.63 ep 279.44 clf 279.68 fh 279.92 wv279.69 ep 279.34 ac dwy278.34 ac dwy 278.68 ep 278.79 di 279.38 ep 279.29 gb 279.51 ac dwy 280.64 clf278.67 ep 279.27 clf 278.86 ep 278.45 ac dwy 277.43 gdw 277.96 gdw 277.41 gdw 278.52 clf 278.38 gdw 278.48 clf 278.09 gdw 277.79 gdw 277.27 fl 277.81 gdw 277.46 gdw 0.00 fig 12 0.00 JP 0.00 JP 0.00 *jp 280.95 tc @ end 280.84 ep 280.61 ep 280.47 fnc ang 280.66 gas meter 280.59 sw 280.77 tstp 280.75 tstp 281.29 slb 281.32 slb 280.46 sw 280.38 sw 280.37 bw 280.16 tc 280.38 sw 279.72 fl 279.76 lip 280.40 dbl yellow 281.12 bw 280.90 tc @ dwy 280.45 fl 280.51 lip 281.52 piv 281.76 wm 281.55 wm 281.39 wm 281.05 tel mh 281.52 dbl yellow 281.77 bw 281.61 sw 281.46 sw281.48 tc @ dwy 281.15 tc @ dwy 281.03 fl 281.14 lip 281.04 lip 280.97 lip280.92 fl 281.68 ep 281.23 ep280.99 ep 280.73 ep 280.07 ep 281.62 tob 282.07 tob 281.36 tob 281.33 lo 12 280.75 cedar 11 280.88 cedar 12 280.81 lo 8 8 8 fork 281.16 ut 281.54 brdband can 281.44 tc @ dwy 281.84 tc @ dwy 282.13 bw 282.10 ac dwy 281.99 tc @ ci 281.38 fl 281.48 lip fl 282.31 slb 282.60 dbl yellow 282.01 flush curb282.10 flush curb 280.82 ug 280.77 ug 280.80 ug 280.75 ug 279.81 wm 281.15 uw281.09 uw 280.88 uw 281.14 uw 279.09 tc @ dwy 278.64 tc @ dwy 278.64 fl 278.68 lip 279.83 tc 278.75 co 278.04 fl 278.59 tc@ci, Inv271.44 278.68 ut 278.30 ssmh, Inv268.05thru, 268.30in 278.46 sdmh 278.12 tc @ ci 278.90 dbl yellow 278.14 dbl yellow 277.05 tc@ci, Inv272.75 279.24 poc trunk cedar 279.37 poc trunk cedar 279.38 poc trunk cedar 279.86 ng 279.74 sw 279.79 sw 279.48 brick wk 279.31 conc dwy279.09 conc dwy 278.99 pavers 278.84 cedar 19 279.13 poc trunk pine 279.82 poc trunk pine279.74 poc trunk pine 280.71 pine 24 281.18 pine 36 280.66 ep 280.53 ep 280.54 gate 280.77 end fnc 278.41 slb 278.49 gdw 278.68 ep 278.71 ep 278.71 ep 278.72 ep 278.61 ep 278.61 slb 278.50 ac dwy 278.63 ac dwy 279.37 ac dwy 279.28 ac dwy 278.56 ac dwy 278.44 ip 6" post 278.70 ip 6" post 278.77 ac dwy 279.20 ac dwy 279.55 ac dwy 279.94 ac dwy 279.92 ac dwy 279.46 ac dwy 278.58 ep 278.60 ep 278.39 ep 280.09 slb 280.07 slb 280.35 sw 280.39 sw 281.45 poc trunk cedar 281.31 poc trunk cedar 281.21 poc trunk cedar 279.45 slb 279.45 slb 279.50 elect. meter 279.22 co 279.09 slb 279.21 slb 279.53 slb 281.32 tstp 281.33 tstp 281.30 tstp 281.29 tstp 281.30 tstp 278.44 ac dwy 278.46 ac dwy 278.58 ac dwy 278.59 slb 278.58 ac dwy 278.12 ac dwy 277.62 ac dwy 277.71 ng 278.01 ng 279.19 slb 278.36 steel plate 11" dia 278.05 gdw 277.19 broken ac ep 277.47 broken ac ep 276.88 broken ac ep276.78 broken ac ep 277.04 inside fnc 276.01 inside fnc 276.22 broken ac ep 276.57 broken ac ep 276.61 ep 276.60 ep 276.13 inv 4" abs sd 276.39 sd cnc patc @ inside fnc 276.38 inside fnc 276.38 inside fnc cor 276.34 ep 276.33 ep 278.75 ng 279.40 clf 280.10 clf 278.69 tc @ end 278.40 ep 278.48 ep 278.60 clf 278.37 n side fnc jog s 1.5 to chlk fnc 278.83 cedar 13 9 276.87 ep 276.99 ep 276.50 ep 276.70 ep 276.67 ep 277.12 ng 277.42 tree 10 278.37 sp 277.38 tc bc 277.05 lip276.95 pavers 276.81 fl 276.88 flush curb 277.10 lip 276.90 fl 276.96 fl 276.96 lip276.89 fl 276.71 fl 276.72 lip 276.65 lip 276.70 tc 276.23 fl 276.29 lip 276.74 bw 276.68 sw 276.61 tc 276.14 fl 276.20 lip 276.42 ep 276.50 ep 276.82 tc 276.72 tc 276.99 dbl yellow 277.45 sdmh 277.17 bw 277.27 bw 277.34 bw 277.47 bw 278.60 tc 278.59 tc 278.12 fl 278.16 lip 278.16 pavers 276.99 pavers 277.47 tc 277.48 tc 276.97 pavers 277.73 tc @ dwy 277.26 tc @ dwy 277.28 tc @ dwy277.67 tc @ dwy 277.23 pavers 277.16 pavers 277.68 tc 277.75 tc 277.14 pavers 277.15 pavers 277.64 tc 277.66 tc @ end 277.66 brc 277.16 fl 277.16 lip 277.31 lip 277.72 brc 277.39 fl 277.44 fl 277.37 lip 277.79 brc 277.77 brc 277.82 tc 277.36 fl 277.36 lip277.32 tow @ fnc cont 20' +- 276.09 ng 277.70 fh 277.27 ssmh 277.24 wv 277.26 pavers 277.77 tc 276.59 ng 277.13 wv 277.12 pavers 277.75 tc 277.82 ng 278.43 wv Cherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny DriveN89°55'16"E139.01'S0°02'48"E389.79'N89°56'35"E139.33'S0°00'00"W389.74' (E) 8" Sewer (E) 6" Water (E) 24" Storm(E) 10" Sewer(E) 8" WaterAPN 359-20-030 (E) Barn and all other accessory structures to be demolished (E) House to be demolished (E) Garage to be demolished (E) ADU to be demolished (E) AC Driveway to be removed(E) Gravel Driveway to be removed (E) AC Driveway to be removed (E) AC Driveway to be removed (E) Drive Apron to be Plugged (E) Drive Apron to be Plugged All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished All (E)slabs & walkways onsite to be demolished 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C2-Topo Map & Demo Plan.dwg - 7/19/2021 6:45 PM - Plotted 7/19/2021 6:46 PM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO ExistingSHEET 221047 C2 5Site Topographic Map & Demo Plan20860 McClellan RoadMay 20211"=20'MFHSSTORM DRAIN MANHOLE (SD-1) SLOPE SECTION - DETAIL MONUMENT, TYPE AS SHOWN BENCH MARK STREET BARRICADE (A-32) WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM DRAIN FENCE, TYPE AS SHOWN DRIVEWAY APPROACH (A-8 & 9) CURB AND GUTTER DROP INLET (SD-4) CURB INLET (SD-5) SWALE REVISION W GAS (T) (E) (G) TELEPHONE ELECTRIC (W) (SS) (SD) DESCRIPTION (City Std Detail#) CENTER LINE PROPERTY LINE LEGEND PROPOSED EXISTING SHEET NO. BEG. VERTICAL CURVEBVC MAXIMUMMAX. PRIVATE STORM DRAIN EASEMENT PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT PROPERTY LINE PULL BOX REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE STORM DRAIN MANHOLE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE SIDEWALK TEMPORARY BENCH MARK TOP OF CURB WATER METER WATER VALVE RIGHT OF WAY STANDARD POINT OF VERTICAL INTERSECTION NATURAL GROUND EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT SW END VERTICAL CURVE FIRE HYDRANT FLOW LINE GRADE BREAK FINISH GRADE FINISH FLOOR END OF RETURN GB FH FG FL EVC (E) EX FF ER EXISTING WM WV TYP. TYPICAL TC TBM END OF CURVE DRIVEWAY DUCTILE IRON PIPE EXISTING GRADE ELECTROLIER DROP INLET CLEAN OUT CORRUGATED METAL PIPE CENTERLINE OF DRIVEWAY CENTERLINE CURB INLET CATCH BASIN BACK OF SIDEWALK CL D/W DI D.I.P. EC EG ELCT DWY CMP CO CB CI BW SSMH STD. SDMH R/W P.S.E. P.S.D.E. RCP PVI MIN. PB NG MINIMUM HIGH POINT GATE VALVE LOW POINT JOINT POLE ASPHALT CONCRETE BEGINNING OF CURVE BUILDING BC BLDG ABBREVIATIONS: AC INV. LP JP INVERT GV HP X X X X X SD SS LC LP (A-31) (2.1%)2.2% D 15 SD (SD) BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONBFE >> E STORM JUNCTION BOX HANDICAP RAMP (A-1 & A-5) North SCALE: 1"=20'010203040LICENSE D L A ND S U R VEYORHARIN D E R SI N GLAST A TE OF CA L IF O R NIANo. 8347 PC 09-13-2022 341 of 439 (sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)>>>SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SDSDSD SDSDSD FF 279.35 Pad 278.52 FF 279.80 Pad 278.97 FF 280.20 Pad 279.37 FF 280.60 Pad 279.77 Cherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive(25')(10.5')(20')20.5'5'(5')(±8)'(278.77)(279.26)(279.54)(279.77)(280.10)(280.38)(280.54) (281.45)(281.68) (277.20) (276.38) (276.04)(276.41) Pad 279.77 FF 280.60 (0.20'+0.67') FF=HP Swale + 10" Slab Section(281)(2 8 0 ) (280 ) (281 ) (279 )(277)(278)(278) (2 7 8 ) (2 7 9 )(280)(280)(279)(279)(277) (2 7 8 )(279)(279) (281)(282)(278)280.16 tc 279.72 fl 279.76 lip 280.90 tc @ dwy 280.45 fl 280.51 lip 281.12 tc @ dwy 280.97 lip 280.92 fl 281.84 tc @ dwy tc @ ci 281.38 fl 279.09 tc @ dwy 278.64 fl 278.68 lip 278.27 lip 278.14 lip 278.02 fl 278.59 tc@ci, Inv271.44 277.05 tc@ci, Inv272.75 277.38 tc bc 277.05 lip 276.95 pavers 277.10 lip276.96 fl 276.96 lip 276.89 fl 276.71 fl277.17 tc poc 276.72 lip 276.70 tc 276.23 fl 276.29 lip 276.61 tc 276.14 fl 276.20 lip 277.35 hcr 278.12 fl 278.16 lip 276.99 pavers 277.47 tc 277.48 tc 276.97 pavers 277.73 tc @ dwy 277.67 tc @ dwy 277.23 pavers 277.16 pavers277.68 tc 277.75 tc 277.14 pavers 277.15 pavers 277.64 tc 277.66 tc @ end 277.66 brc 277.16 fl 277.16 lip 277.31 lip 277.72 brc 277.39 fl 277.44 fl 277.37 lip 277.79 brc 277.77 brc 277.82 tc 277.36 fl 277.36 lip 277.26 pavers 277.77 tc 277.12 pavers 277.75 tc (20') (30') S1 S1S2 S2HP Fl 2 7 8. 2 5 TW2 7 9. 0 0 TW2 7 8. 1 0 FF 279.15 Pad 278.27 MOFG 278.43 Fl27 8. 0 0 Fl27 8. 0 0 Fl27 8. 0 0 hp Fl 2 7 8. 2 5 Fl27 8. 0 0 hp2 7 8. 2 5 TW2 7 9. 0 0 TW2 7 8. 5 0 (278.51) FF 279.43 Pad 278.60 Fl27 8. 2 2 HP Fl 2 7 8. 5 6 Fl27 8. 2 2 (279.04)(6" W all)(7" W all)(12" W all) TW2 7 9. 0 0 (16" W all)(21" W all)(21" W all)(21" W all) (E)FF 279.20± (E)Pad 277.20± (E)FF 278.70± (E)Pad 276.70± (E)FF 279.37± (E)Pad 277.37± Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 Tree ±6' Min 6"-Max 21" CMU Retaining Wall @ Property Line Max 21" CMU Retaining Wall @ Property Line Typical Bio-Retention Basin Max. 9" Ponding Typ. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot Swale Typ Roof Leader Splash Block -1.4%Bio-Soil Top Elev 276.90 TW2 7 7. 7 5 Fl27 8. 0 0 Fl27 7. 1 4HP F l278 .47 Fl27 7. 5 8 HP Fl 2 7 8. 9 2 Fl27 7. 9 3 HP F l279 .32 H P F l 2 7 9 . 7 2 Fl27 8. 4 0 (E) CI to be Replaced with a Manhole RIM 279.44 CI Grate 278.77 INV 274.29, 15"∅Out SDMH RIM 278.13 With 3"Ø Orifice Plate on 10"Ø Pipe INV 273.34, 10"∅In INV 273.01, 15"∅In INV 271.44, 15"∅In INV 271.44, 15"∅Out (E) CI RIM 276.55 INV 272.75, 15"∅Out CI Grate 276.54 INV 272.47, 12"∅Out (E)SDMH RIM 278.46 INV 271.00, 15"∅In INV 267.16, 30"∅Out 30' - 15"Ø RCP @ S=4.31% (E) 15"Ø SD @ S=2.61% (E) 15"Ø SD @ S=1.47% TW2 7 8. 1 0 Overflow Overflow OverflowOverflow Overflow Overflow 190'-24"Ø Perforated HDPE wrapped in 12" drain rock Total Vol = 1,698cf Bio-Soil Top Elev 276.39 Bio-Soil Top Elev 276.39 Bio-Soil Top Elev 277.18 Bio-Soil Top Elev 277.65 Grate 278.05 Inv276.05± Grate 277.75± Inv276.65± Grate 277.05 Inv275.85± 52' - 10"Ø C900@ S=0.50% 105' - 10"Ø C900@ S=0.38% SDMH Rim 276.93 Inv 274.00', 10" Ø (In) Inv 269.26', 24" Ø (Out) 4' - 12"Ø HDP@ S=11.72% CI Rim 276.72 Inv 272.70', 12" Ø (Out) SDMH Rim 276.83 Inv 269.26', 24" Ø (In) Inv 272.30', 12" Ø (In) Inv 273.60', 10" Ø (Out) -0.25% -1.25% GbTc277.70Tc277.29HPTc277.44LPTc277.04 GbTc276.96 PRC GbTc277.08 Tc277.38 -0.25% GbTc278.93 -3.1%-4.3%-0.25%0.67% (E)Fl278.64 -2.17%-1.65%Conform (e)2.1%3.56%GbTc277.42 LPTc277.23 GbTc277.00 -0.25% 4'P.S.D.E.4'P.S.D.E.Bio-Soil Top Elev 277.25S3 S312"DI Rim 277.00 Inv 274.40', 10" Ø (Out) PL-1PL-4 PL-5 PL-6 PL-3 PL-2 ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU PROFILE: Grading Section S1 SCALE H: 1"=20' SCALE V: 1"=5' 277 278 279 280 281 282 277 278 279 280 281 282 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+50 3+00 3+50 4+00 4+32 Pad278.27 Pad278.60 Pad278.52 Pad278.97 Pad279.37 Pad279.77 McClellan Road (30' R/W) (E)Pad279.0±Exterior BoundaryAvg. 12" High (Max 21") CMU Retaining Wall @ Property Line Lot 6 Lot 5 Lot 4 Lot 3 Lot 2 Lot 1 Typical Bulkhead Retainer at the bottom of Fence as needed @ Property Line PROFILE: Grading Section S2 SCALE H: 1"=20' SCALE V: 1"=5' 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 0+50 1+00 1+50 2+00 2+09 Cherryland Drive (Private Street) Pad278.97 Parcel B APN359-20-043 (E)FF 279.2± (E)Pad 277.2± Max. 2:1 Slope with 12" Overbuild Lot 3 FF279.43 Exterior BoundaryPROFILE: Garding Section S3 SCALE H: 1"=20' SCALE V: 1"=5' 275 276 277 278 279 280 275 276 277 278 279 280 0+50 1+00 1+50 1+77 Tw278.35 Pad278.52 Lot 6 FF279.35 Max. 2:1 Slope with 12" Overbuild Exterior BoundaryExterior BoundaryParcel C APN359-20-044 (E)FF 278.7± (E)Pad 276.7± Avg. 12" High (Max 24") CMU Retaining Wall @ Property Line Permeable Paver Street & Onsite Driveway Grasscrete Onsite Parking Space PCC Sidewalk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C3-Prelim Grading & Drainage Plan.dwg - 9/6/2022 8:12 AM - Plotted 9/6/2022 8:13 AM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO Existing; 221047 LO New; 221047-Hatch; 221047 Arch 4-11-22SHEET 221047 C3 5Preliminary Grading & Drainage Plan20860 McClellan RoadSept 20221"=20'MFHSHARIN D E R SI N GLAST ATE OF CA L IF O R NIAC49717 REGISTERED P R O F ESSIONA L E NGI NEER±13'14.5'North SCALE: 1"=20'0102030403.25" Vehicular rated pavers Scarify and compact upper 12" of soil to 90% relative maximum density 3/4" Clean crushed rock or class II permeable base rock wrapped in filter fabric ASTM No. 8 bedding course & paver filler Typical Permeable Paver Section Tensar BX100 Biaxial Geogridmin.12"min.12Not to Scale Looking North Existing Pervious Pavement sawcut line Not to Scale(E) PL2% Permeable Pavers on Bedding Course and Stone Subbase per the Soils Engineer to match existing Street Section 4'9"P/L1.5-3.5% Street Section-Cherryland Drive Widening Curb & Gutter or full depth Vertical Curb & Sidewalk as shown on plan CL (±8') 20.5' (10.5') 1.0-2.5%1.0-2.5% (5') (20') 14.5' 3" 5"PUE & LE Hardscape Legend:20'PC 09-13-2022 342 of 439 (sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)>>>SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SDSDSD SDSDSD Cherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive(25')(20')20.5'Building Setback Building SetbackBuilding SetbackTypical Bio-Retention Basin Max. 9" Ponding Typ. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot SwaleTyp. Lot Swale tc @ ci (20') (30') Typ Roof Leader Splash Block WS277.65 12.34'10'18'10'16.5' 38.5'10'16.5'10'16.5' WS278.00 WS277.14 WS277.58 WS277.93 WS278.40 Overflow Overflow Overflow Overflow Overflow 5'Bio-Soil Top Elev 276.90 Bio-Soil Top Elev 276.39 Bio-Soil Top Elev 276.39 Bio-Soil Top Elev 277.18 Bio-Soil Top Elev 277.65 Bio-Soil Top Elev 277.25 SCM-6 SCM-5 SCM-4 SCM-3 SCM-2 SCM-1 8,051sf6,879sf 6,972 sf 6,975 sfDMA-6 7,751sf Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5Lot 6 8,630sf DMA-5 DMA-4 DMA-3 DMA-2 DMA-1 DMA-7 Lot 7 4,987sf 190'-24"Ø Perforated HDPE wrapped in 12" drain rock Total Vol = 1,698cf 17. 5 '10'8.5'PL-1PL-4 PL-5 PL-6 PL-3 PL-2 ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU Permeable Paver Street & Onsite Driveway Grasscrete Onsite Parking Space PCC Sidewalk 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C4-Prelim StormWater Management Plan.dwg - 9/6/2022 8:18 AM - Plotted 9/6/2022 8:18 AM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO Existing; 221047 LO New; 221047-Hatch; 221047 Arch 4-11-22SHEET 221047 C4 5Prelim StormWater Management Plan20860 McClellan RoadSeptl 20221"=20'MFHSHARIN D E R SI N GLAST ATE OF CA L IF O R NIAC49717 REGISTERED P R O F ESSIONA L E NGI NEERVegetation per Landscape Plans) Engineered Bio-soil Planting Media Class 2 drain rockPonding Depth (Max. 9")Natural/Uncompacted Subgrade Scale: None Typical Bio-Retention Basin Detail Length Varies (see plan) 3" Mulch Layer 18"Min.North SCALE: 1"=20'01020304024"Min.Typical Planter/Retaining Curb Enclosure 12"3"FreeboardTyp.36" Overflow Weir Bio-Soil Level9"pondingScale: None Typical Downstream Elevation Width Varies (See Plan)3"FreeboardTyp.Note: Bottom of basin on lot 6 (TA-6) will be paved with impervious slab (6"PCC on compacted sub-grade). A 6"Ø hole shall be drilled through the slab to allow percolation. 3.25" Vehicular rated pavers Scarify and compact upper 12" of soil to 90% relative maximum density 3/4" Clean crushed rock or class II permeable base rock wrapped in filter fabric ASTM No. 8 bedding course & paver filler Typical Permeable Paver Section Tensar BX100 Biaxial Geogridmin.12"min.12Not to Scale Scale: None Typical Inflow Pipe size, slope & invert per Plan Level Bottom AASHTO M288 Class 2 Non-Woven Geotextile or equal, Sides & Top only 3/4" Clean Drain Rock Level Top (Std. Backfill per geotech) Min. 48" Finish Grade Above Install Std. Manhole Frame & Grate/Cover as called out on Plan 48" Ø (typ) maintenance manhole/inlet as shown on Plan 12" 12"Typ12"TypTypical Detail-'HDPE' Perforated Pipe Storage Manifold 12" Outflow Pipe size, slope & invert per Plan Hardscape Legend: PC 09-13-2022 343 of 439 JTJT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JTSSSSSSSSSSSSWW W W W WCOCOCOCOCOCOCO E E E E E E SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SDSDSD SDSDSD (sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(fh)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(w)(ss)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(sd)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(ss)(w)(w)(w)(ss)(ss)(ss)(sd)JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT JT>>>(E) 8" Sewer (E) 6" Water (E) 24" Storm(E) 10" Sewer(E) 8" WaterCherryland Drive (private Street)McClellan RoadBonny Drive Lot 1Lot 2Lot 3Lot 4Lot 5 Lot 6 Utility Improvement Notes City Standard 4"Ø Sewer Lateral City Standard 1"Ø Water Service Standard Electrical Service Existing Private Street Light Existing Fire Hydrant Proposed Private Street Light if Necessary Remove Existing Service Pole & Overhead to the House Relocate Existing Joint Pole behind new Curb & Gutter at a location approved by the City 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 Appx Loaction (E) Joint Trench Appx Location Proposed Joint Trench 3333 3 3 5 4 4 6 6 87 1 2 3 5 4 6 8 7 PL-1PL-4 PL-5 PL-6 PL-3 PL-2 ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU ADU 4'P.S.D.E.1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 320 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 0 L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\221047 C5-Prelim Utility Plan.dwg - 9/6/2022 8:19 AM - Plotted 9/6/2022 8:19 AM by Harinder SinglaJOB NO. OF 16075 Vineyard BoulevardMorgan Hill, CA 95037DATE:SCALE:DRAWN BY:CHECKED BY:Xrefs: 221047 LO New; 221047 LO Existing; 221047-Hatch; 221047 Arch 4-11-22SHEET 221047 C5 5Preliminary Utility Plan20860 McClellan RoadSept 20221"=20'MFHSHARIN D E R SI N GLAST ATE OF CA L IF O R NIAC49717 REGISTERED P R O F ESSIONA L E NGI NEERPC 09-13-2022 344 of 439 (fh)LOT 2 40'Existing No Parking (Painted Red Curb) at Fire Hydrant Proposed No Parking (Painted Red Curb) Widened Side of the Cul-de-sac Proposed 6 Parking Spaces along Widened Side of the Street 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 160 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 0 SCALE:L:\Projects\Harry\221047-Alok Ventures, LLC, McClennan Road, Cupertino\DWG\2210047 AutoTurn.dwg - 8/9/2021 2:16 PM - Plotted 8/9/2021 2:17 PM by Harinder SinglaSHEET ofDRAWN BY: JOB #: DATE:16075 VINEYARD BOULEVARD MORGAN HILL, CA 95037Xrefs: 221047 LO New; 221047 LO Existing; 221082 Arch 7-02-211 1 221047 Aug 2021 1" = 40' KW North 605040302010SCALE: 1"=30'0Exhibit "Fire Truck Turnaround-AutoTurn" Cherryland Drive 20860 McClellan Road, Cupertino PC 09-13-2022 345 of 439 of#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 346 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSDSDSDSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEY1LLomandra PlatinumDietes irridioidesDVSHRUBS1WUCOLSRATINGLOWLOWSIZEGALLONSSPACING4' - 6'3' - 6'Turf tall Fescue sod with 2x4 rough redwood header boardLawnsodHIGH--Plant quantities are for planning purposes only. 1NNandina Gulf StreamLOW3' - 6'-5LCLoropetalum Razzleberry or other maroon oneLOW4' - 6'-Heavenly Bamboo1 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner2 Front yard walkway - Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to beselected by owner.3 Paving for side yard walkways natural gray color concrete.with no coloradded and score joints or conc. interlocking pavers as selected by owner.4 Rear patios- Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to be selected byowner. Install score joints and expansion joints to control cracking if conc.is used. Use concrete steps, color to go well with pavers if pavers used.5 Existing fence - Repair and or replace as needed6 Install new 3 foot wide gates with galv. hardware7 Install 6 foot high wood fence - vertical overlapping 1x8 or 1x6 RWDor cedar with 2x4 RWD horiz. rails, 2x8 PT kicker, and 4x4 PT posts max.8' OC8910 Min. 2 feet wide landscape strip for drainage swale along sides ofproperty11 3 feet wide gravel path/landing - 3" deep gravel with weed cloth and2x4 redwood header - gravel to be selected by owner12 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner. This represents a front pedestrian path and shouldbe a contrasting color and or pattern that goes well with the rest of thedriveway and matches the front walk paving if possible in pattern andcolor.GARB Concrete or paver pad for Garbage and Recycle Bins min. 3' x 7'GROUND COVERS5MCMyrtus communisLOW5' - 8'-Contractor to install all plants shown on plan and verify plant count.Salvia LipstickSR1LOW3' - 6'-PRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max-Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when plantedGrecian LaurelRed SalviaLantana montevidensis purpleLM1LOW3' - 6'-Low Purple LantanaMyrtleFortnight LilySalvia leucantha Santa BarbaraSL1LOW3' - 6'-Mexican SageOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredSTREET TREE24" boxPCPistacia chinensisLOW3Min. height of installed replacement tree is 6 feet when plantedChinese PistacheOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLimonium pereziiLP1LOW3' - 6'-Sea Statice1LBLomandra BreezeLOW4' - 6'-Ask owner if he wants to increase any of the installed plant sizes15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max-Fern PineFRONT YARD AND ADDITIONAL TREES24" boxLILagerstroemia TuscaroraLOW7Crape Myrtle24" boxPCPistacia chinensis Keith DaviesLOW3Chinese Pistache1BFBulbine frutescensLOW4' - 6'-Chondropetalum tectorumC1LOW3'-Small Cape RushJuncus patens Elk BlueJ1LOW3'-CA Gray RushLantana montevidensis whiteLW1LOW3' - 6'-Low White LantanaMin. height of installed front yard and street trees is 8 feet when plantedOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredPC 09-13-2022 347 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSDSDSDSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 348 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSDSDSDSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 349 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSDSDSDSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max4Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Grecian LaurelOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can 15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max5Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGget them minimum height requiredPC 09-13-2022 350 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSDSDSDSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net Irrigation Notes"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the landscape design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 351 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSDSDSDSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netLot 1IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1330 sfAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable) so it is not an issueThere is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackPC 09-13-2022 352 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 353 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 354 of 439 of#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 355 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEY1LLomandra PlatinumDietes irridioidesDVSHRUBS1WUCOLSRATINGLOWLOWSIZEGALLONSSPACING4' - 6'3' - 6'Turf tall Fescue sod with 2x4 rough redwood header boardLawn sodHIGH--Plant quantities are for planning purposes only. 1NNandina Gulf StreamLOW3' - 6'-5LCLoropetalum Razzleberry or other maroon oneLOW4' - 6'-Heavenly Bamboo1 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner2 Front yard walkway - Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to beselected by owner.3 Paving for side yard walkways natural gray color concrete.with no coloradded and score joints or conc. interlocking pavers as selected by owner.4 Rear patios- Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to be selected byowner. Install score joints and expansion joints to control cracking if conc.is used. Use concrete steps, color to go well with pavers if pavers used.5 Existing fence - Repair and or replace as needed6 Install new 3 foot wide gates with galv. hardware7 Install 6 foot high wood fence - vertical overlapping 1x8 or 1x6 RWDor cedar with 2x4 RWD horiz. rails, 2x8 PT kicker, and 4x4 PT posts max.8' OC8910 Min. 2 feet wide landscape strip for drainage swale along sides ofproperty11 3 feet wide gravel path/landing - 3" deep gravel with weed cloth and2x4 redwood header - gravel to be selected by owner12 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner. This represents a front pedestrian path and shouldbe a contrasting color and or pattern that goes well with the rest of thedriveway and matches the front walk paving if possible in pattern andcolor.GARB Concrete or paver pad for Garbage and Recycle Bins min. 3' x 7'GROUND COVERS5MCMyrtus communisLOW5' - 8'-Contractor to install all plants shown on plan and verify plant count.Salvia LipstickSR1LOW3' - 6'-PRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max-Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when plantedGrecian LaurelRed SalviaLantana montevidensis purpleLM1LOW3' - 6'-Low Purple LantanaMyrtleFortnight LilySalvia leucantha Santa BarbaraSL1LOW3' - 6'-Mexican SageOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredSTREET TREE24" boxPCPistacia chinensisLOW3Min. height of installed replacement tree is 6 feet when plantedChinese PistacheOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLimonium pereziiLP1LOW3' - 6'-Sea Statice1LBLomandra BreezeLOW4' - 6'-Ask owner if he wants to increase any of the installed plant sizes15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max-Fern PineFRONT YARD AND ADDITIONAL TREES24" boxLILagerstroemia TuscaroraLOW7Crape Myrtle24" boxPCPistacia chinensis Keith DaviesLOW3Chinese Pistache1BFBulbine frutescensLOW4' - 6'-Chondropetalum tectorumC1LOW3'-Small Cape RushJuncus patens Elk BlueJ1LOW3'-CA Gray RushLantana montevidensis whiteLW1LOW3' - 6'-Low White LantanaMin. height of installed front yard and street trees is 8 feet when plantedOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height required"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the landscape design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 356 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 357 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 358 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBSMin. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Order from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can 15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max4Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGget them minimum height required15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max5Grecian LaurelPC 09-13-2022 359 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBSMin. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Order from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can 15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max-Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGget them minimum height requiredPC 09-13-2022 360 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net Irrigation Notes"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the irrigation design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 361 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netLot 2IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1200 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackPC 09-13-2022 362 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 363 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 364 of 439 of#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 365 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEY1LLomandra PlatinumDietes irridioidesDVSHRUBS1WUCOLSRATINGLOWLOWSIZEGALLONSSPACING4' - 6'3' - 6'Turf tall Fescue sod with 2x4 rough redwood header boardLawn sodHIGH--Plant quantities are for planning purposes only. 1NNandina Gulf StreamLOW3' - 6'-5LCLoropetalum Razzleberry or other maroon oneLOW4' - 6'-Heavenly Bamboo1 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner2 Front yard walkway - Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to beselected by owner.3 Paving for side yard walkways natural gray color concrete.with no coloradded and score joints or conc. interlocking pavers as selected by owner.4 Rear patios- Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to be selected byowner. Install score joints and expansion joints to control cracking if conc.is used. Use concrete steps, color to go well with pavers if pavers used.5 Existing fence - Repair and or replace as needed6 Install new 3 foot wide gates with galv. hardware7 Install 6 foot high wood fence - vertical overlapping 1x8 or 1x6 RWDor cedar with 2x4 RWD horiz. rails, 2x8 PT kicker, and 4x4 PT posts max.8' OC8910 Min. 2 feet wide landscape strip for drainage swale along sides ofproperty11 3 feet wide gravel path/landing - 3" deep gravel with weed cloth and2x4 redwood header - gravel to be selected by owner12 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner. This represents a front pedestrian path and shouldbe a contrasting color and or pattern that goes well with the rest of thedriveway and matches the front walk paving if possible in pattern andcolor.GARB Concrete or paver pad for Garbage and Recycle Bins min. 3' x 7'GROUND COVERS5MCMyrtus communisLOW5' - 8'-Contractor to install all plants shown on plan and verify plant count.Salvia LipstickSR1LOW3' - 6'-PRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max-Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when plantedGrecian LaurelRed SalviaLantana montevidensis purpleLM1LOW3' - 6'-Low Purple LantanaMyrtleFortnight LilySalvia leucantha Santa BarbaraSL1LOW3' - 6'-Mexican SageOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredSTREET TREE24" boxPCPistacia chinensisLOW3Min. height of installed replacement tree is 6 feet when plantedChinese PistacheOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLimonium pereziiLP1LOW3' - 6'-Sea Statice1LBLomandra BreezeLOW4' - 6'-Ask owner if he wants to increase any of the installed plant sizes15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max-Fern PineFRONT YARD AND ADDITIONAL TREES24" boxLILagerstroemia TuscaroraLOW7Crape Myrtle24" boxPCPistacia chinensis Keith DaviesLOW3Chinese Pistache1BFBulbine frutescensLOW4' - 6'-Chondropetalum tectorumC1LOW3'-Small Cape RushJuncus patens Elk BlueJ1LOW3'-CA Gray RushLantana montevidensis whiteLW1LOW3' - 6'-Low White LantanaMin. height of installed front yard and street trees is 8 feet when plantedOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height required"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the landscape design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 366 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 367 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBSMin. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Order from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can 15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max4Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGget them minimum height required15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max5Grecian LaurelPC 09-13-2022 368 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net Irrigation Notes"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the landscape design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 369 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netLot 3IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1200 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackPC 09-13-2022 370 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 371 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 372 of 439 of#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 373 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEY1LLomandra PlatinumDietes irridioidesDVSHRUBS1WUCOLSRATINGLOWLOWSIZEGALLONSSPACING4' - 6'3' - 6'Turf tall Fescue sod with 2x4 rough redwood header boardLawn sodHIGH--Plant quantities are for planning purposes only. 1NNandina Gulf StreamLOW3' - 6'-5LCLoropetalum Razzleberry or other maroon oneLOW4' - 6'-Heavenly Bamboo1 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner2 Front yard walkway - Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to beselected by owner.3 Paving for side yard walkways natural gray color concrete.with no coloradded and score joints or conc. interlocking pavers as selected by owner.4 Rear patios- Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to be selected byowner. Install score joints and expansion joints to control cracking if conc.is used. Use concrete steps, color to go well with pavers if pavers used.5 Existing fence - Repair and or replace as needed6 Install new 3 foot wide gates with galv. hardware7 Install 6 foot high wood fence - vertical overlapping 1x8 or 1x6 RWDor cedar with 2x4 RWD horiz. rails, 2x8 PT kicker, and 4x4 PT posts max.8' OC8910 Min. 2 feet wide landscape strip for drainage swale along sides ofproperty11 3 feet wide gravel path/landing - 3" deep gravel with weed cloth and2x4 redwood header - gravel to be selected by owner12 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner. This represents a front pedestrian path and shouldbe a contrasting color and or pattern that goes well with the rest of thedriveway and matches the front walk paving if possible in pattern andcolor.GARB Concrete or paver pad for Garbage and Recycle Bins min. 3' x7'GROUND COVERS5MCMyrtus communisLOW5' - 8'-Contractor to install all plants shown on plan and verify plant count.Salvia LipstickSR1LOW3' - 6'-PRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max-Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when plantedGrecian LaurelRed SalviaLantana montevidensis purpleLM1LOW3' - 6'-Low Purple LantanaMyrtleFortnight LilySalvia leucantha Santa BarbaraSL1LOW3' - 6'-Mexican SageOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredSTREET TREE24" boxPCPistacia chinensisLOW-Min. height of installed replacement tree is 6 feet when plantedChinese PistacheOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLimonium pereziiLP1LOW3' - 6'-Sea Statice1LBLomandra BreezeLOW4' - 6'-Ask owner if he wants to increase any of the installed plant sizes15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max-Fern PineFRONT YARD AND ADDITIONAL TREES24" boxLILagerstroemia TuscaroraLOW-Crape Myrtle24" boxPCPistacia chinensis Keith DaviesLOW-Chinese Pistache1BFBulbine frutescensLOW4' - 6'-Chondropetalum tectorumC1LOW3'-Small Cape RushJuncus patens Elk BlueJ1LOW3'-CA Gray RushLantana montevidensis whiteLW1LOW3' - 6'-Low White LantanaMin. height of installed front yard and street trees is 6 feet when plantedOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height required"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the landscape design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 374 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 375 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBSMin. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Order from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can 15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max4Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGget them minimum height required15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max5Grecian LaurelPC 09-13-2022 376 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net Irrigation Notes"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the landscape design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 377 of 439 JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netLot 4IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1260 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackPC 09-13-2022 378 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 379 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 380 of 439 of#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 381 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEY1LLomandra PlatinumDietes irridioidesDVSHRUBS1WUCOLSRATINGLOWLOWSIZEGALLONSSPACING4' - 6'3' - 6'Turf tall Fescue sod with 2x4 rough redwood header boardLawn sodHIGH--Plant quantities are for planning purposes only. 1NNandina Gulf StreamLOW3' - 6'-5LCLoropetalum Razzleberry or other maroon oneLOW4' - 6'-Heavenly Bamboo1 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner2 Front yard walkway - Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to beselected by owner.3 Paving for side yard walkways natural gray color concrete.with no coloradded and score joints or conc. interlocking pavers as selected by owner.4 Rear patios- Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to be selected byowner. Install score joints and expansion joints to control cracking if conc.is used. Use concrete steps, color to go well with pavers if pavers used.5 Existing fence - Repair and or replace as needed6 Install new 3 foot wide gates with galv. hardware7 Install 6 foot high wood fence - vertical overlapping 1x8 or 1x6 RWDor cedar with 2x4 RWD horiz. rails, 2x8 PT kicker, and 4x4 PT posts max.8' OC8910 Min. 2 feet wide landscape strip for drainage swale along sides ofproperty11 3 feet wide gravel path/landing - 3" deep gravel with weed cloth and2x4 redwood header - gravel to be selected by owner12 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner. This represents a front pedestrian path and shouldbe a contrasting color and or pattern that goes well with the rest of thedriveway and matches the front walk paving if possible in pattern andcolor.GARB Concrete or paver pad for Garbage and Recycle Bins min. 2' x 6'GROUND COVERS5MCMyrtus communisLOW5' - 8'-Contractor to install all plants shown on plan and verify plant count.Salvia LipstickSR1LOW3' - 6'-PRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max8Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when plantedGrecian LaurelRed SalviaLantana montevidensis purpleLM1LOW3' - 6'-Low Purple LantanaMyrtleFortnight LilySalvia leucantha Santa BarbaraSL1LOW3' - 6'-Mexican SageOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredSTREET TREE24" boxPCPistacia chinensisLOW3Min. height of installed replacement tree is 6 feet when plantedChinese PistacheOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLimonium pereziiLP1LOW3' - 6'-Sea Statice1LBLomandra BreezeLOW4' - 6'-Ask owner if he wants to increase any of the installed plant sizes15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max3Fern PineFRONT YARD AND ADDITIONAL TREES24" boxLILagerstroemia TuscaroraLOW7Crape Myrtle24" boxPCPistacia chinensis Keith DaviesLOW3Chinese Pistache1BFBulbine frutescensLOW4' - 6'-Chondropetalum tectorumC1LOW3'-Small Cape RushJuncus patens Elk BlueJ1LOW3'-CA Gray RushLantana montevidensis whiteLW1LOW3' - 6'-Low White LantanaMin. height of installed front yard and street trees is 8 feet when plantedOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredPC 09-13-2022 382 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 383 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBSMin. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Order from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can 15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max3Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGget them minimum height required15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max8Grecian LaurelPC 09-13-2022 384 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net Irrigation Notes"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the irrigation design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 6/23/22PC 09-13-2022 385 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netLot 5IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1178 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackPC 09-13-2022 386 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 387 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 388 of 439 of#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 389 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEY1LLomandra PlatinumDietes irridioidesDVSHRUBS1WUCOLSRATINGLOWLOWSIZEGALLONSSPACING4' - 6'3' - 6'Turf tall Fescue sod with 2x4 rough redwood header boardLawn sodHIGH--Plant quantities are for planning purposes only. 1NNandina Gulf StreamLOW3' - 6'-5LCLoropetalum Razzleberry or other maroon oneLOW4' - 6'-Heavenly Bamboo1 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner2 Front yard walkway - Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to beselected by owner.3 Paving for side yard walkways natural gray color concrete.with no coloradded and score joints or conc. interlocking pavers as selected by owner.4 Rear patios- Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to be selected byowner. Install score joints and expansion joints to control cracking if conc.is used. Use concrete steps, color to go well with pavers if pavers used.5 Existing fence - Repair and or replace as needed6 Install new 3 foot wide gates with galv. hardware7 Install 6 foot high wood fence - vertical overlapping 1x8 or 1x6 RWDor cedar with 2x4 RWD horiz. rails, 2x8 PT kicker, and 4x4 PT posts max.8' OC8910 Min. 2 feet wide landscape strip for drainage swale along sides ofproperty11 3 feet wide gravel path/landing - 3" deep gravel with weed cloth and2x4 redwood header - gravel to be selected by owner12 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner. This represents a front pedestrian path and shouldbe a contrasting color and or pattern that goes well with the rest of thedriveway and matches the front walk paving if possible in pattern andcolor.GARB Concrete or paver pad for Garbage and Recycle Bins min. 3' x 7'GROUND COVERS5MCMyrtus communisLOW5' - 8'-Contractor to install all plants shown on plan and verify plant count.Salvia LipstickSR1LOW3' - 6'-PRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max10Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when plantedGrecian LaurelRed SalviaLantana montevidensis purpleLM1LOW3' - 6'-Low Purple LantanaMyrtleFortnight LilySalvia leucantha Santa BarbaraSL1LOW3' - 6'-Mexican SageOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredSTREET TREE24" boxPCPistacia chinensisLOW3Min. height of installed replacement tree is 6 feet when plantedChinese PistacheOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLimonium pereziiLP1LOW3' - 6'-Sea Statice1LBLomandra BreezeLOW4' - 6'-Ask owner if he wants to increase any of the installed plant sizes15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max4Fern PineFRONT YARD AND ADDITIONAL TREES24" boxLILagerstroemia TuscaroraLOW7Crape Myrtle24" boxPCPistacia chinensis Keith DaviesLOW3Chinese Pistache1BFBulbine frutescensLOW4' - 6'-Chondropetalum tectorumC1LOW3'-Small Cape RushJuncus patens Elk BlueJ1LOW3'-CA Gray RushLantana montevidensis whiteLW1LOW3' - 6'-Low White LantanaMin. height of installed front yard and street trees is 8 feet when plantedOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredPC 09-13-2022 390 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 391 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBSMin. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Order from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can 15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max4Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGget them minimum height required15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max10Grecian LaurelPC 09-13-2022 392 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net Irrigation Notes"I have complied with the criteria of the Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and applied them forthe efficient use of water in the irrigation design plan"Gregory Lewis - Landscape Architect Lic. #2176 9/7/22PC 09-13-2022 393 of 439 JT J T J T J T JTJTJTJTSS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netLot 6IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 50%(front property line is less than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1310 SFIMPERVIOUS PAVING IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 0 SF = 0%PC 09-13-2022 394 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 395 of 439 #2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 396 of 439 JT JT JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEY1LLomandra PlatinumDietes irridioidesDVSHRUBS1WUCOLSRATINGLOWLOWSIZEGALLONSSPACING4' - 6'3' - 6'Turf tall Fescue sod with 2x4 rough redwood header boardLawnsodHIGH--Plant quantities are for planning purposes only. 1NNandina Gulf StreamLOW3' - 6'-5LCLoropetalum Razzleberry or other maroon oneLOW4' - 6'-Heavenly Bamboo1 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner2 Front yard walkway - Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to beselected by owner.3 Paving for side yard walkways natural gray color concrete.with no coloradded and score joints or conc. interlocking pavers as selected by owner.4 Rear patios- Concrete or pavers, pattern and color to be selected byowner. Install score joints and expansion joints to control cracking if conc.is used. Use concrete steps, color to go well with pavers if pavers used.5 Existing fence - Repair and or replace as needed6 Install new 3 foot wide gates with galv. hardware7 Install 6 foot high wood fence - vertical overlapping 1x8 or 1x6 RWDor cedar with 2x4 RWD horiz. rails, 2x8 PT kicker, and 4x4 PT posts max.8' OC8910 Min. 2 feet wide landscape strip for drainage swale along sides ofproperty11 3 feet wide gravel path/landing - 3" deep gravel with weed cloth and2x4 redwood header - gravel to be selected by owner12 Driveway Paving - Permeable interlocking concrete paver systemcapable of supporting vehicle traffic - manuf., series, pattern, and color tobe selected by owner. This represents a front pedestrian path and shouldbe a contrasting color and or pattern that goes well with the rest of thedriveway and matches the front walk paving if possible in pattern andcolor.GARB Concrete or paver pad for Garbage and Recycle Bins min. 3' x 7'GROUND COVERS5MCMyrtus communisLOW5' - 8'-Contractor to install all plants shown on plan and verify plant count.Salvia LipstickSR1LOW3' - 6'-PRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max-Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when plantedGrecian LaurelRed SalviaLantana montevidensis purpleLM1LOW3' - 6'-Low Purple LantanaMyrtleFortnight LilySalvia leucantha Santa BarbaraSL1LOW3' - 6'-Mexican SageOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredSTREET TREE24" boxPCPistacia chinensisLOW3Min. height of installed replacement tree is 6 feet when plantedChinese PistacheOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLimonium pereziiLP1LOW3' - 6'-Sea Statice1LBLomandra BreezeLOW4' - 6'-Ask owner if he wants to increase any of the installed plant sizes15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max-Fern PineFRONT YARD AND ADDITIONAL TREES24" boxLILagerstroemia TuscaroraLOW7Crape Myrtle24" boxPCPistacia chinensis Keith DaviesLOW3Chinese Pistache1BFBulbine frutescensLOW4' - 6'-Chondropetalum tectorumC1LOW3'-Small Cape RushJuncus patens Elk BlueJ1LOW3'-CA Gray RushLantana montevidensis whiteLW1LOW3' - 6'-Low White LantanaMin. height of installed front yard and street trees is 8 feet when plantedOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height requiredLOT 1 = 3653 sfLOT 2 = 2540 sfLOT 3 = 2538 sfLOT 4 = 2620 sfLOT 5 = 3007 sfLOT 6 = 3558 sfPC 09-13-2022 397 of 439 JT JT JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net PC 09-13-2022 398 of 439 JT JT JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.netPRIVACY SCREENING SHRUBS15LNLaurus nobilisLOW10' max-Min. height of installed screen shrubs is 6 feet when planted. Min. size is 15 gal.Grecian LaurelOrder from nursery a long time in advance to be sure you can get them minimum height required15PGPodocarpus graciliorMED10' max-Fern PineCOMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMEQTYKEYWUCOLSRATINGSIZEGALLONSSPACINGPC 09-13-2022 399 of 439 JT JT JTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTJTSDSS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSD SDSDSD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSD SD SD SD SD SD SDSD SD SD SD SD SD SD SD SDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDSDof#2176GREGORY LEWIS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 736 Park Way Santa Cruz, CA 95065 (831) 359-0960 lewislandscape@sbcglobal.net Lot 1IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1330 sfAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable) so it is not be an issueThere is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackLot 2IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1200 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackLot 3IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1200 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackLot 4IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1260 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackLot 5IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 40%(front property line is more than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1178 SFAll paving in fysb is pervious (permeable)There is 0% impervious paving in the front yard setbackLot 6IMPERVIOUS PAVING IN 20 FOOT FRONT YARD SETBACK CANNOT EXCEED 50%(front property line is less than 60 feet)TOTAL AREA IN FRONT YARD SETBACK = 1310 SFIMPERVIOUS PAVINGArea 6a 45Area 6b 111Total impervious 156 sf impervious 156 sf/1310 sf= 12% OKPC 09-13-2022 400 of 439 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 22-11261 Agenda Date: 9/13/2022 Agenda #: 5. Subject: Modification of an existing Use Permit (U-2005-04) to allow above ground crypts on a portion of the Gates of Heaven Cemetery. (Application No.: M-2022-002; Applicant: Heather Gloster (Gates of Heaven Cemetery); Location: 22557 Cristo Rey Drive; APN: 342-63-002) That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolution (Attachment 1) to: 1. Find that the proposed actions are exempt from CEQA; and 2. Approve the Use Permit Amendment (M-2022-002). CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 9/8/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ PC 09-13-2022 401 of 439 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Agenda Date: September 13, 2022 SUBJECT Modification of an existing Use Permit (U-2005-04) to allow above ground crypts on a portion of the Gates of Heaven Cemetery. (Application No.: M-2022-002; Applicant: Heather Gloster (Gates of Heaven Cemetery); Location: 22557 Cristo Rey Drive; APN: 342-63-002) RECOMMENDED ACTIONS That the Planning Commission adopt the proposed draft resolution (Attachment 1) to: 1. Find that the proposed actions are exempt from CEQA; and 2. Approve the Use Permit Amendment (M-2022-002). DISCUSSION: Project Data: General Plan Designation Quasi-Public/Institutional General Plan Neighborhood Oak Valley Zoning Designation BQ – Quasi-Public Building Lot Area 58.44 acres Project Consistency With: General Plan Yes Zoning Yes Environmental Assessment Categorically Exempt per Sections 15301 (Class 1) and 15303 (Class 3) of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) PC 09-13-2022 402 of 439 M-2022-002 22557 Cristo Rey Drive September 13, 2022 Page 2 Background: The Gate of Heaven Cemetery, located in the Oak Valley neighborhood, was annexed in 1986 from the County of Santa Clara (County). The Cemetery is bounded by the Oak Valley Development to the north and east, the Monta Vista PG&E substation to the east, the historic Snyder Hammond House to the south, and Rancho San Antonio Preserve to the south and west. The cemetery operated under a Santa Clara County Use Permit approved in 1962 which permitted the cemetery use and the location and development of access driveways. Currently, there is no Master Plan in place for the Gate of Heaven development. Since annexation, Gate of Heaven has obtained several City of Cupertino permits to develop vacant and undeveloped land for additional burials, niches, and accessory facilities as needed. Previous Approvals The County had approved the use permit (Attachment 3) for the cemetery in 1962 to be developed as a “memorial park with flat horizontal markers.” Table 1 below summarizes the various planning entitlements since incorporation into Cupertino. Table 1 Planning Entitlements since incorporation. Planning Permit Description 12-U-94 Construction of a 3,500 square foot mausoleum crypt U-2005-04 Approved statuary, Veterans markers and landscaping. Did not permit upright markers. DIR-2005-33 Minor modification to landscaping in the Veteran’s Section of the cemetery. M-2011-01, ASA-2011-01 Detailed 14-year plan broken up into Four Phases. These include modifications to interior road network, further inground burial plots, terraced burial grounds, and upright marker plots. Please refer to Condition 2 of Planning Commission Resolutions 6622 & 6623 (Attachment 4) DIR-2020-006 New pergola with above-ground cremains in the Veteran’s Memorial section Figure 1: Aerial View N PC 09-13-2022 403 of 439 M-2022-002 22557 Cristo Rey Drive September 13, 2022 Page 3 Any deviation for the original approval, or modification of any subsequent approval, requires a Planning entitlement. Application Request The applicant, Heather Gloster, Director of Cemeteries for the San Jose Diocese, is requesting an Amendment to the existing Use Permit (U-2005-04) to allow the addition of four above ground private estate units (or crypts) and landscaping within the All-Souls section of the cemetery, which is located at the southeast portion of the parcel, directly adjacent to Rancho San Antonio Park. See Figure 2 for location of the crypts in the cemetery. The four crypts will be located adjacent to the terraced area of the All-Souls section of the cemetery. Each crypt is approximately four feet tall, seven feet wide, and 8 feet long. Two deceased persons can be interred within each structure. The whole private estate area is proposed to be screened from public view with landscaping. See Figure 3 for the vision of the private estate area. Analysis: Modification to Use: The idea for the proposed crypts was first discovered by City staff when one of the crypts was placed onsite without an entitlement. See Figure 4 for a photo of the existing crypt. A Code Enforcement case was opened in November 2021. Prior entitlements and modifications looked closely at the relationship with the existing residential neighborhoods around the cemetery. The private estate area is approximately 1,100 feet from the Figure 3 Proposed private estate area. Figure 2 Location of proposed crypts. All-souls Terrace Figure 4 Unpermitted Crypt. PC 09-13-2022 404 of 439 M-2022-002 22557 Cristo Rey Drive September 13, 2022 Page 4 Stonebridge Townhomes to the southeast of the area, while being approximately 1,200 feet away from the closest single- family home in the Oak Valley development to the north. Therefore, due to the large distances from the residences and the modest size of the crypts and landscaping proposed around them, it is expected that the private estate area will not be visible from the existing homes. It is anticipated that the total number of burials at the property will not increase due to the additional crypts. No trees are proposed to be removed with this proposal and no other modifications have been reviewed or anticipated as part of this permit. Grading is minimal as these crypts are slab on grade. Since the area impacted by the construction is less than 3,000 sq. ft. at the Cemetery, this is not an intensification of the use. The added crypts are consistent with the functions of the cemetery, and with the added landscaping, maintains a natural look to the Gate of Heaven Cemetery. Environmental Review This project is categorically exempt from the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Sections 15301: Existing Facilities & 15303: New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures. Other Department/Agency Review The City’s Public Works Department, Building Division, Environmental Programs Division, and the Santa Clara County Fire Department have no objections to the project. Their comments have been incorporated as conditions of approval in the draft resolution. Figure 5 Distance from neighboring residential developments. PC 09-13-2022 405 of 439 M-2022-002 22557 Cristo Rey Drive September 13, 2022 Page 5 PUBLIC NOTICING AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH The following table is a brief summary of the noticing for this project: Notice of Public Hearing Agenda  Site Signage (at least 10 days prior to hearing)  Legal ad placed in newspaper (at least 10 days prior to hearing)  32 notices mailed to property owners 300 feet from the cemetery (but more than 1100 feet from the proposed crypts) (at least 10 days prior to the hearing)  Posted on the City's official notice bulletin board (five days prior to hearing)  Posted on the City of Cupertino’s Web site (five days prior to hearing) Neighborhood Outreach Prior to submitting the application for the modification, the applicant conducted outreach to the homeowners in the Oak Valley and Stonebridge communities, as well as to the properties adjacent to the shared property line to the cemetery. The City received one emailed response from one neighbor who was opposed of the approval of the proposal. Further, Staff has spoken with the complainant for the code enforcement case on multiple occasions. Their concern centered on how the above ground crypt was placed prior without a use permit modification, as well as how it is non-conforming to the horizontal markers throughout the cemetery. PERMIT STREAMLINING ACT This project is subject to the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920 – 65964). The City has complied with the deadlines found in the Permit Streamlining Act. Project Received: May 19, 2022; Deemed incomplete: June 19, 2022 Project Resubmission: July 1, 2022; Deemed Complete: July 30, 2022 The City has 60 days from the date of the determination that the project is categorically exempt to make a decision on the project. REQUIRED FINDINGS Staff recommends approval of the Use Permit Modification, as the proposed private estate crypts will not create adverse traffic, noise, or safety impacts to the surrounding area and each finding for approval of the proposed project, consistent with Chapter 19.156 of the Cupertino Municipal Code, may be made as reflected in the draft resolutions. With respect to the Use Permit Amendment, the following findings may be made: PC 09-13-2022 406 of 439 M-2022-002 22557 Cristo Rey Drive September 13, 2022 Page 6 1. The proposed development and/or use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience. The proposed four above ground crypts in the private estate area of the All-Souls section of the Gate of Heaven Cemetery will not cause any further traffic, noise, or visual impacts to the existing uses onsite. Surrounding residential uses will be over 1,000 feet from the nearest crypts, and for those visiting the cemetery, the crypts will be visually mitigated with landscaping to ensure privacy of those interred while also maintaining a natural look to the site. 2. The proposed development and/or use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, underlying zoning regulations, and the purpose of this title and complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is consistent with and will be conducted in a manner in accordance with, the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with previous approvals. Furthermore, the use is categorically exempt under CEQA in that the proposed project involves minor changes to an existing facility. NEXT STEPS Should the project be approved, the Planning Commission’s decision on this project is final unless an appeal is filed within 14 calendar days of the date of the decision. All approvals granted by the Planning Commission shall go into effect after 14 days. Upon project approval, the applicant will be able to submit building permit drawings to enable construction to commence. These approvals expire on September 13, 2023, at which time the applicant may apply for a one-year extension. Prepared by: Gian Paolo Martire, Senior Planner Reviewed by: Piu Ghosh, Planning Manager Approved by: Albert Salvador, Acting Director of Community Development ATTACHMENTS 1. Draft Resolution for M-2022-002 2. Plan Set 3. Santa Clara County Use Permit 4. Planning Commission Resolutions 6622 & 6623 PC 09-13-2022 407 of 439 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A MODIFICATION OF AN EXISTING USE PERMIT (U-2005-04) TO ALLOW ABOVE GROUND CRYPTS ON A PORTION OF THE GATES OF HEAVEN CEMETERY LOCATED AT 22557 CRISTO REY DRIVE SECTION I: PROJECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: M-2022-002 Applicant: Heather Gloster (Gates of Heaven Cemetery) Location: 22557 Cristo Rey Drive (APN: 342-63-002) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR A USE PERMIT: WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received an application for an amendment to an existing Use Permit (U-2005-04) to allow above ground crypts on a portion of the Gates of Heaven Cemetery; WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given as required by the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held at least one public hearing in regard to the application; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 (Public Resources Code section 21000 et seq.) (“CEQA”), together with the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000 et seq.) (hereinafter, "CEQA Guidelines"), the City staff has independently studied the proposed Project and has determined that the Project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to the categorical exemption in CEQA Guidelines section s 15301 and 15303 for the reasons set forth in the staff report dated September 13, 2022 and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and PC 09-13-2022 408 of 439 Resolution No. M-2022-002 September 13, 2022 Page 2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds: 1. The proposed development and/or use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience. The proposed four above ground crypts in the private estate area of the All-Souls section of the Gate of Heaven Cemetery will not cause any further traffic, noise, or visual impacts to the existing uses onsite. Surrounding residential uses will be over 1,000 feet from the nearest residences, and for those visiting the cemetery, the crypts will be visually mitigated with landscaping to ensure privacy of those interred while also maintaining a natural look to the site. 2. The proposed development and/or use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan, underlying zoning regulations, and the purpose of this title and complies with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed project is consistent with and will be conducted in a manner in accordance with, the General Plan, Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with previous approvals. Furthermore, the use is categorically exempt under CEQA in that the proposed project involves minor changes to an existing facility. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission is the approval authority for this project and is granted the authority by the Municipal Code to exercise its independent judgment, based on the record before it, for purposes of the California Environmental Quality Act; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission takes the following actions: 1. Exercises its independent judgment and determines that the Project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines sections 15301 and 15303. The Class 1 exemption applies to existing facilities that involve negligible or no expansion of existing or former use. The proposed project is for four crypts that take up around 3,000 square feet of a an approximately 58-acre site. Therefore, the proposed project would not involve the expansion of the former use (Section 15301, Class 1), will not significantly expand the use beyond the current use that already exists or previously existed, and will not have a significant effect on the environment. Further, Class 3 exemptions consist of construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Each crypt is small in relation to other approved structures within the site. Therefore, the proposed proj ect is small and consistent with Section 15303, Class 3. PC 09-13-2022 409 of 439 Resolution No. M-2022-002 September 13, 2022 Page 3 2. Approves the application for a Modification to Use Permit, Application no. M -2022- 002 subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on PAGE 3 thereof. The conclusions and sub conclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based, including those contained in the Public Hearing record concerning Application no. M-2022-002 as set forth in the Minutes of Planning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2022, are hereby incorporated by reference as though fully set forth herein. SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS Approval is based on the plan set entitled “2 Crypt Display Mausoleum” consisting of two sheets showing the engineering of the crypts; a Gate of Heaven Map consisting of three sheets, prepared by CFCS Planning, except as may be amended by conditions in this resolution. 2. ANNOTATION OF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL The conditions of approval set forth shall be incorporated into and annotated on the first page of the building plans. 3. ACCURACY OF PROJECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 4. PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All previous conditions of approval shall remain in effect except as may be amended by conditions contained in this resolution. 5. FUTURE REVIEW OF USE PERMIT In the event of any documented substantial problems and/or violations, the City reserves the right to review this use permit at any time for imposing additional conditions of approval or revocation of the use permit. 6. MODIFICATIONS APPROVED Four above ground crypts are approved to allow up to eight deceased to be interred. No increase in the total number of burials allowed at the Cemetery is permitted with this approval. PC 09-13-2022 410 of 439 Resolution No. M-2022-002 September 13, 2022 Page 4 7. CONSULTATION WITH OTHER DEPARTMENTS The applicant is responsible to consult with other departments and/or agencies with regard to the proposed project for additional conditions and requirements. Any misrepresentation of any submitted data may invalidate an approval by the Community Development Department. 8. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HOURS AND NOISE LIMITS a. All grading activities shall be limited to the dry season (April 15 to October 1), unless permitted otherwise by the Director of Public works. b. Construction hours and noise limits shall be compliant with all requirements of Chapter 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. c. Grading, street construction, underground utility and demolition hours for work done more than 750 feet away from residential areas shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Grading, street construction, demolition or underground utility work within 750 feet of residential areas shall not occur on Saturdays, Sundays, holidays, and during the nighttime period as defined in Section 10.48.053(b) of the Municipal Code. d. Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays as defined in Chapter 10.48 of the Municipal Code. Night time construction is allowed if compliant with nighttime standar ds of Section 10.48 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. e. Rules and regulations pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of an applicant appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. f. The applicant shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. The applicant shall comply with the above grading and construction hours and noise limit requirements unless otherwise indicated. 9. NOISE AND VIBRATION NOTICE At least 10 days prior to the start of any demolition, ground disturbing, or construction activities, the project applicant/contractor shall send notices of the planned activity by first class mail to off-site businesses and residents within 500 feet of the project site. The City will provide a template notice and mailing addresses for the Applicant’s use. The notice must be approved by City staff prior to sending. The project applicant shall provide the City with evidence of mailing of the notice, upon request. PC 09-13-2022 411 of 439 Resolution No. M-2022-002 September 13, 2022 Page 5 Please note that, if pile driving, the requirements for noticing and monitoring outlined in City Code Section 17.04.050 G (3) shall apply. 10. NOISE AND VIBRATION SIGNAGE At least 10 days prior to the start of any demolition, ground disturbing, or construction activities, the project applicant/contractor shall ensure that a sign measuring at least four feet by six feet shall be posted on construction fenci ng at the entrance(s) to the job site, clearly visible to the public, and include the following: a. Permitted construction days and hours; b. A description of proposed construction activities; c. Telephone numbers of the City’s and contractor’s authorized represent atives that are assigned to respond in the event of a noise or vibration complaint; and d. Contact information for City’s and contractor’s authorized representatives that are assigned to respond in the event of a complaint related to fugitive dust, pursuant to the requirements for compliance with BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. If the authorized contractor’s representative receives a complaint, they shall investigate, take appropriate corrective action, and report the complaint and the action taken to the City within three business days of receiving the complaint. 11. NOISE DURING CONSTRUCTION Prior to issuance of any demolition, grading or building permit, include on plans a note that, during project construction, the project applicant shall incorporate the following measures to reduce noise during construction and demolition activity: a. The project applicant and contractors shall prepare and submit a Construction Noise Control Plan to the City’s Planning Department for review and approval prior to issuance of the first permit. The Construction Noise Plan shall demonstrate compliance with daytime and nighttime decibel limits pursuant to Chapter 10.48 (Community Noise Control) of Cupertino Municipal Code. The details of the Construction Noise Control Plan shall be included in the applicable construction documents and implemented by the on-site Construction Manager. Noise reduction measures selected and implemented shall be based on the type of construction equipment used on the site, distance of construction activities from sensitive receptor(s), site terrain, and other features on and surrounding the site (e.g., trees, built environment) and may include, but not be limited to, temporary construction noise attenuation walls, high quality mufflers. During the entire active construction period, the PC 09-13-2022 412 of 439 Resolution No. M-2022-002 September 13, 2022 Page 6 Construction Noise Control Plan shall demonstrate that compliance with the specified noise control requirements for construction equipment and tools will reduce construction noise in compliance with the City’s daytime and nighttime decibel limits. b. Select haul routes that avoid the greatest amount of sensitive use areas and submit to the City of Cupertino Public Works Department for approval prior to the start of the construction phase. c. Signs will be posted at the job site entrance(s), within the on -site construction zones, and along queueing lanes (if any) to reinforce the prohibition of unnecessary engine idling. All other equipment will be turned off if not in use for more than 5 minutes. d. During the entire active construction period and to the extent feasible, the use of noise producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells will be for safety warning purposes only. The construction manager will use smart back-up alarms, which automatically adjust the alarm level based on the background noise level or switch off back-up alarms and replace with human spotters in compliance with all safety requirements and law. 12. FUGITIVE DUST CONTROL Prior to issuance of the any demolition, grading, or building permit, include on all permit plans, the full text of each of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s Basic Control Measures from the latest version of BAAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, as subsequently revised, supplemented, or replaced, to control fugitive dust (i.e., particulate matter PM2.5 and PM10) during demolition, ground disturbing activities and/or construction. 13. INDEMNIFICATION AND LIMITATION OF LIABILITY As part of the application, to the fullest extent permitted by law, the applicant shall agree to indemnify, defend with the attorneys of the City’s choice, and hold harmless the City, its City Council, and its officers, employees, and agents (collectively, the “indemnified parties”) from and against any liability, claim, action, cause of action, suit, damages, judgment, lien, levy, or proceeding (collectively referred to as “proceeding”) brought by a third party against one or more of the indemnified parties or one or more of the indemnified parties and the applicant related to any Ordinance, Resolution, or action approving the project, the related entitlements, environmental review documents, finding or determinations, or any other permit or approval authorized for the project. The indemnification shall include but not be limited to damages, fees, and costs awarded against the City, if any, and cost of suit, attorneys’ fees, and other costs, liabilities, and expenses incurred in connection with such proceeding whether PC 09-13-2022 413 of 439 Resolution No. M-2022-002 September 13, 2022 Page 7 incurred by the Applicant, the City, or the parties initiating or bringing such proceeding. The applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City its actual attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defense of the litigation. Such att orneys’ fees and costs shall include amounts paid to the City’s outside counsel and shall include City Attorney time and overhead costs and other City staff overhead costs and any costs directly related to the litigation reasonably incurred by City. The applicant shall likewise agree to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the indemnified parties from and against any damages, attorneys’ fees, or costs awards, including attorneys’ fees awarded under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5, assessed or awarded against the indemnified parties. The Applicant shall cooperate with the City to enter a Reimbursement Agreement to govern any such reimbursement. The Applicant shall agree to (without limitation) reimburse the City for all costs incurred in additional investigation or study of, or for supplementing, redrafting, revising, or amending, any document (such as an Environmental Impact Report, negative declaration, specific plan, or general plan amendment) if made necessary by proceedings challenging the project approvals and related environmental review, if the applicant desires to continue to pursue the project. The Applicant shall agree that the City shall have no liability to the Applicant for business interruption, punitive, speculative, or consequential damages. 14. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of September, 2022 at a noticed Public Hearing of the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino, State of California, held by the Director of Community Development, or his or her designee, pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code Section 19.12.120. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMISSIONERS: ATTEST: APPROVED: PC 09-13-2022 414 of 439 Resolution No. M-2022-002 September 13, 2022 Page 8 ___________ _____________ Piu Ghosh Steven Scharf Planning Manager Chair, Planning Commission PC 09-13-2022 415 of 439 1/1FRONT ELEVATIONSCALE 1" = 1'-0"2/1SIDE ELEVATIONSCALE 1" = 1'-0"3/1REAR ELEVATIONSCALE 1" = 1'-0"A/1HORIZONTAL SECTIONSCALE 1" = 1'-0"B/1VERTICAL SECTIONSCALE 1" = 1'-0"C/1VERTICAL SECTIONSCALE 1" = 1'-0"D/1ENGLARGED HORIZONTAL DETAILSCALE 3" = 1'-0"4/1FOUNDATION PLANSCALE 1" = 1'-0"E/1ENGLARGED ROOF DETAILSCALE 3" = 1'-0"BENCH3 THUSSCALE 1" = 1'-0"A/1A/1D/126789CARVECARVE354GRANITE FLOOR SLOPES 1/2" TO REARE/11B/1B/1C/1C/1ANCHOR-MATERIAL LISTDESCRIPTIONQUANTITY3/4"Ø x 12" Lg.. S.S. Threaded Rod23/4"Ø x 18" Lg. S.S. Threaded Rod2Type 6 S.S. Dowel Cramp23/8"Ø x 2 1/4" Lg. Kwik Bolt23/8"Ø x 3" Lg. Kwik Bolt11/2"Ø x 6" Lg. Type 3183/8"Ø x 4" Lg. Type 3183" x 4" x 2" Type 59 S.S. Angle2Bronze Floor Drain2Short Shank Bronze Rosette2Bronze T-Handel1Standard Circular Bronze Vent65/8" Denver Rope70 Ln FtSilicone Caulk -7 tubes1/4" x 1" x 2" Plastic Shims321/8" x 1" x 2" Plastic Shims81/16" x 1" x 2" Plastic Shims8Cap.ipt1DISTRIBUTION DATEPROJECTLOCATIONPURCHASERDESIGN NUMBERDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYMATERIAL / FINISHJOB NUMBERSHEET NUMBERDR-039 (14March19)10183081 2 Crypt Display MausoleumLos Altos, CAGate of Heaven - Diocese of San Jose3482JA modPauline OmbergSHIP DATE WILL BE A MINIMUM OF 4 WEEKS FROM THERECEIPT OF APPROVED CARVING DETAILS ALONG WITHALL PERTINENT CUTTING INFORMATIONIN THE EVENT ANY OR ALL PORTIONS OF THIS BUILDING IS CONSTRUCTED BY SOME ONE OTHER THANCOLDSPRING OR ONE OF ITS DESIGNATED SUBCONTRACTORS, COLDSPRING MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATION THAT THE STRUCTURE DEPICTED IN THESE DRAWINGS WHEN CONSTRUCTED WILL BE STRUCTURALLY SOUND OR WILL MEET STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS, UNLESS A LICENSED ARCHITECT OR ENGINEER HAS CERTIFIED, STAMPED AND AFFIXES A WET SIGNATURE OF APPROVAL TO THESE DRAWINGS AND THE STRUCTURE HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED IN COMPLIANCE WITH SAID STAMPED AND WET SIGNED DRAWINGS. NOTE: STATE AND LOCAL BUILDING CODE REVIEW MAYNECESSITATE CHANGES TO STAMPED ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERED DRAWINGS. FURTHER, COLDSPRING'S WARRANTY DOES NOT APPLY TO ANY PORTION OF THE STRUCTURE DEPICTED IN THESE DRAWINGS THAT IS NOT CONSTRUCTED BY COLDSPRING OR ITS DESIGNATED SUBCONTRACTOR.1st Approval12-22-2020 Sierra White / PolishTHIS DESIGN IS PROPERTY OF COLDSPRING AND PROTECTED BY APPLICABLE COPYRIGHT LAWS. UNAUTHORIZED USE ORDUPLICATION IS PROHIBITED.© 6/19/2019 COLDSPRINGALL RIGHTS RESERVED17482 GRANITE WEST ROAD, COLD SPRING, MN 56320-4578PHONE (320) 685-3621, FAX (320) 685-5052WWW.COLDSPRINGUSA.COM6'-11"158"3'-1078"±7'-734"158"3'-1078"±8'-6"1'-712"8'-7"2'-134"2"1'-3"3"10"38"Ø X 4" LG. TYPE 31W/ 1"Ø X 312" DP. HOLESIN SIDE WALL3'-258"±6'-11"1'-558"1'-558"6'-734"3'-258"±6"8'-6"6'-734"9"9"FLOOR DRAIN6"6"7'-734"8'-6"8'-6"7'-734"6"6"4"6'-734"PRELIMINARYNOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONMISC MATERIALSQUANTITYDESCRIPTION1Setting Kit and Instructions81/2"Ø x 6" Lg. Type 31SHIPPING LIST1 Thru 7 & 10 Assembled8 & 9 Unassembled6'-734"INNER GRADE CUT TO 4" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL FOR AIR SPACEFLOOR DRAIN1'-6"3"1'-6"34"Ø X 1'-0" LG. S.S. THREADED DOWEL INTO WALLS34"Ø X 1'-6" LG. S.S. THREADED DOWEL INTO FLOOR8"9"1'-0"2'-0"1'-0"2'-0"3"118"Ø HOLE THRUFOR SHORTSHANK ROSETTESTANDARD BRONZE CIRCULARVENT, INSTALL PRIOR TO SHIPPINGSTANDARD BRONZE CIRCULARVENT, INSTALL PRIOR TO SHIPPING112"8'-7"FOUNDATION DEPTH TO BE PERLOCAL SOIL AND FROST CONDITIONSAND PER GOVERNING CODES112"112"1316" ±18"-116"934"112"6'-11"FOUNDATION DEPTH TO BE PERLOCAL SOIL AND FROST CONDITIONSAND PER GOVERNING CODES10"12"12"38"2"78"3116"+18"-116"6"118"VARIES0'-0"0'-0"618"SCUPPERS10" WIDE X 4" DP. SLOT FORSETTING SLING REMOVAL. GROUT SLOTS FULL AFTER MAUSOLEUM IS SET (4 THUS)Module ThicknessTolerance1 3/16"+1/8" / -1/16"1 15/16"+1/8 / -1/16"6 1/8"+/- 1/8"8 1/8"+/- 1/8"6"6"2'-812"(2'-914" C/F)234"2'-812"(2'-914" C/F)6"6"9"2'-0"2'-0"9"6"14"2'-2"14"618"±18"UNIFORM14"8"2'-814"14"618"±18"UNIFORM112"7'-934"14"6"112"2'-634"2'-634"1'-0"10"14"1112"1/2" Dia. x 6" Lg Type 311/2" Dia. x 6" Lg Type 311/2" Dia. x 6" Lg Type 311/2" Dia. x 6" Lg Type 3138"Ø X 4" LG. TYPE 31W/ 1"Ø X 312" DP. HOLESIN REAR WALL6'-11"2'-814"14"618"±UNIFORM158"2'-78"158"2'-78"Delivery schedule and sequence contingent upon return date of approved drawings, with all cutting information. See contract for specific details. Not for Construction.FOR1stAPPROVALDRAWINGS ARE APPROVED WITH CHANGES AS NOTED ONSHEETS RELEASE TO PRODUCTIONDRAWINGS HAVE CHANGES AND ARE NOT APPROVED. REVISE AND RESUBMIT.WITH THE ABOVE APPROVAL, THE CLIENT IS AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF THE PROJECT INTO PRODUCTION. CHANGES WILL RESULT IN ADDITIONAL FEES AND/OR TIME DELAYS.DRAWINGS ARE APPROVED, NO CHANGES NEEDED, RELEASE TO PRODUCTIONCLIENT APPROVAL:DATECLIENT SIGNATURECLIENT NAMEDRAWINGS AND SAMPLES HAVEBEEN REVIEWED FOR MATCH TO EXISTING PROJECT.FOUNDATION DRAWINGS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED ORCERTIFIED BY A LICENSED ENGINEER. THESE DRAWINGSARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY, PLEASE CONSULT YOUR LOCALBUILDING OFFICIAL FOR CODE COMPLIANCE AND ORCERTIFIED ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS.10"7'-8"7'-61316"612"2"7'-912" GRANITE DIVIDER 10"14"7'-114"612"1"SETTING SPACE3'-1078"±6"14"2'-2"14"618"±18"UNIFORM14"8"3'-258"1"SETTING SPACE1'-0"6'-6"1'-0"1'-0"4'-734"1'-0"INNER GRADE CUT TO 4" BELOW TOP OF FOUNDATION WALL FOR AIR SPACERebar size, location andconfiguration shown forreference only. Consult acertified engineer forspecific details.FINISHED FRADE TO SLOPEAWAY FROM MAUSOLEUMAT ALL SIDES#5 REBAR CONT.@ TOP & BOTTOM612"5'-634" GRANITE FLOOR612"158"6"±2'-812"±3116"±2'-8316"±6"±158"618"18"2'-2"14"618"±18"UNIFORM14"2'-814"10"7'-8"1'-2"10"3'-4"10"1'-6"2'-378"6"6"6"6"2'-378"112"118"34"1316"12"1316"12"1316"34"6"6"2'-812" C/f Opng 2’-9 14” C/F234"1316" +18"-116"112"2"NOTE: THE SOIL ON WHICH THIS FOUNDATIONRESTS SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF CARRYING A CONTACT PRESSURE OF AT LEAST 2,500 PSF.NOTE: CONCRETE USED FOR FOUNDATIONSHOULD BE MIN. 3000 PSI. FOLLOWLOCAL OR STATE GOVERNING CODES.6"14"2'-2"14"618"14"8"812"5'-6"812"3/8" Dia. x 4" Lg Type 31#5 REBAR CONT.@ TOP & BOTTOM104'-0"1'-2"1"1'-0"1"4"4116"4116"4"2"2"2"2"1'-2"14"4116"±UNIFORM1'-6516"±PC 09-13-2022 416 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 417 of 439 C F C SPLANNING& DESIGNDIOCESE OF SAN JOSEGATE OF HEAVEN CEMETERYPRIVATE FAMILY ESTATE AREAPC 09-13-2022 418 of 439 C F C SPLANNING& DESIGNd d d d d a a a a a a a a a d d d a a a a a a a a a PRIVATE FAMILY ESTATE AREA DIOCESE OF SAN JOSEGATE OF HEAVEN CEMETERYPRIVATE FAMILY ESTATE AREAPC 09-13-2022 419 of 439 C F C SPLANNING& DESIGNd d d d d a a a a a a a a a d d d a a a a a a a a a PRIVATE FAMILY ESTATE AREA DIOCESE OF SAN JOSEGATE OF HEAVEN CEMETERYPRIVATE FAMILY ESTATE AREAPC 09-13-2022 420 of 439 PC 09-13-2022 421 of 439 ASA-2011-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6622 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING AN ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF NEW BURIAL GROUNDS (NO CHANGES TO THE GENERAL LOCATION AND NUMBER OF UPRIGHT MARKERS) AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURAL AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING CEMETERY LOCATED AT 22555 CRISTO REY DRIVE (GATE OF HEAVEN CATHOLIC CEMETERY) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: ASA-2011-01 Applicant:Irving Gonzales on behalf of Gate of Heaven Catholic Cemetery Location: 22555 Cristo Rey Drive (APN 342-63-002,342-63-004, and 342-63-005) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR ARCHITECTURAL AND SITE APPROVAL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received applications for a Modification of a Use Permit and an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposal, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; and 2) The proposal is consistent with the purposes of this chapter, and will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and Cupertino Zoning Ordinance. NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Architectural and Site Approval is hereby Approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. ASA-2011-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 22, 2011, and are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. PC 09-13-2022 422 of 439 Resolution No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-2- SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits submitted by Gonzales Architects, titled "St. Mary Section," dated March 4, 2011, consisting of pages A1.0, A2.0, LP-1, Prelixninary Grading and Drainage Plan, Memo to the Canyon Oak Way Home Neighbors dated September 13, 2010 and Questions and Answers of the Proposed Development Dated August 12, 2010, and the Construction Activity Description in the letter dated March 4, 2011, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. USE AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to modify Use Permit, U-2005-04, to modify an approved plan of burial ground locations, landscaping and site improvements for an approximately four (4) acre portion of the cemetery as shown in the approved Exhibits. The applicant shall prepare a construction phasing schedule, demonstrating completion of the project within 14 years of this approval upon the conceptual phasing schedule provided below that prescribes the scope of work, timing of development and construction activity duration of each phase: Proposed Development Phasing Schedule Scope, Estimated Time Frame &Construction Duration Phase 1 Roadway& Landscape Buffer Year 1 time frame 1-2 month construction duration Phase 2 Ground Burials and Gazebo 1,492 in ground plots, 250 in ground cremains, 750 above ground cremain niches Years 6-10 time frame 3-5 month construction duration Phase 3 Ground Burials 1,222 in ground plots Years 2-5 time frame 1-2 month construction duration Phase 4 Terraced Ground Burials 1,138 upright marker plots Years 11-14 3- 5 month construction duration 3. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A comprehensive construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the start of construction on site including grading) or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 250 feet of any residential property. 4. PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All prior use permit conditions of approval (U-2005-04) and approvals through prior applications to this application shall remain in effect unless superseded by or in conflict with subsequent conditions of approval,including conditions of approval for ASA-2011-01. PC 09-13-2022 423 of 439 Resolution No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-3- 5. SIGNAGE &SIGN PROGRAM Signage is not approved with this use permit application. The applicant shall be required to submit an application for a sign program and signage prior to installation of any signage on site. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. 6. ACCURACY OF THE PROTECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 7. OTHER DEPARTMENTS REVIEW All building department, fire department and Cupertino Sanitary District comments must be addressed prior to issuance of any permit required by the City. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Landscaping Ordinance, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18,Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 9. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT The project is subject to all provisions delineated in the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15). A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report. The landscape installation report shall include,but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan, system tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run-off that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: "The landscape and irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and complies with the criteria of the ordinance and the permit." 10. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his/her designee, either with the landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or any time before the landscape installation report is submitted. a) Schedules should take into account water requirements for the plant establishment period and water requirements for established landscapes. b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the following: routine inspection; pressure testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de-thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control; and removing obstructions to emission devices. PC 09-13-2022 424 of 439 Resolution No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22, 2011 Page-4- c) Failed plants shall be replaced with the same or functionally equivalent plants that may be size-adjusted as appropriate for the stage of growth of the overall installation. Failing plants shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients, pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional. 11. SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT A soils analysis report shall document the various characteristics of the soil (e.g. texture, infiltration rate, pH, soluble salt content, percent organic matter, etc) and provide recommendations for amendments as appropriate to optimize the productivity and water efficiency of the soil. The soil analysis report shall be made available to the professionals preparing the landscape and irrigation design plans in a timely manner either before or during the design process. A copy of the soils analysis report shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development as part of the landscape documentation package. 12. DUST CONTROL. The following construction practices shall be implemented during all phases of construction for the proposed project to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site: a) Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods to prevent visible dust from leaving the site; active areas adjacent to windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard; c) Pave, apply water at least three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads, parking areas and staging areas at construc ion sites. d) Sweep streets daily, or more often if necessary (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets. e) The applicant shall incorporate the City's construction best management practices into the building permit plan set. 13. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTIO N HOURS All grading activities shall be limited to the dry season (April 15 to October 15). Grading hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Grading, street construction, demolition or underground utility work shall not occur on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays, and during the nighttime period as defined in Section 10.48.053(b) of the Municipal Code. Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays. The developer shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. Rules and regulation pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of a developer appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. PC 09-13-2022 425 of 439 Resolution No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-5- 14. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1), these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 15. SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 16. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four-inch depth. Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 17. STREET WIDENING Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. PC 09-13-2022 426 of 439 Resolution No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-6- 18. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 19. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 20. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 21. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 22. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hydrology and pre- and post-development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include,but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins, vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff of the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g.,via buried pipes or other appropriate means of storage) as necessary to avoid an increase of one percent flood water surface elevation of the culvert to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 23. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. 24. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a deyelopment agreement with the City of Cupertino, when the City Engineer deemed appropriate,providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits Fees: a. Checking&Inspection Fees: Per current fee schedule b. Grading Permit: Per current fee schedule c. Development Maintenance Deposit:1,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: TBD e. Power Cost: PC 09-13-2022 427 of 439 Resolution No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-7- f. Map Checking Fees: N/A g. Park Fees: N/A h. Street Tree By Developer Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 25. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 26. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 27. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards (if any) and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Company for water service to the subject development. 28. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT For any land disturbance greater than 1 acre in area, the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 29. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures,for storm water treatment, on the tentative map, unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the City Engineer. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. PC 09-13-2022 428 of 439 Resolution No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-8- All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 30. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 31. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 32. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 33. OPERATIONS&MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non- standard appurtenances in the public road right-of-way that may include,but is not limited to, sidewalk,pavers, and street lights. 34. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 35. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 36. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way, when specified by the City Engineer, and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. 37. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 38. SANTA CLARA WATER DISTRICT CLEARANCE Provide Santa Clara water district approval before recordation of the final map when necessary. The developer shall pay for and obtain Water District permit for activities or modifications within the District easement or fee right of way or affecting District facilities. 39. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary District prior to issuance of building permits. 40. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. PC 09-13-2022 429 of 439 ResoluHon No.6622 ASA-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-9- 41. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG&E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. 42. ROAD WAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS Provide full design plans for both the proposed road extension and all necessary storm drainage improvements. Plans and submittal documents shall include grading quantities, proposed contours and spot elevations, a profile of the road extension in comparison with existing elevations, calculated square footage of proposed impervious surface area, calculated increase in storm drain runoff due to increased impervious area and fully designed storm drain and detention/retention system to ensure there is no increase in storm drain runoff from the property. Any retaining walls over 4-feet in height from top of wall to bottom of foundation will require full structural design with calculations. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of March 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Coininission of the City of Cupertino,State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Lee,Vice Chair Miller, Brophy,Sun, Brownley NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, Chair Director of Community Development Planning Coirunission G:Plariiiirig\PDREPORT RES 2011 ASA-2011-01 res.doc PC 09-13-2022 430 of 439 M-2011-01 CITY OF CUPERTINO 10300 Torre Avenue Cupertino, California 95014 RESOLUTION NO. 6623 OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CUPERTINO APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO A PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED USE PERMIT (U-2005-04) TO ALLOW THE INSTALLATION OF NEW BURIAL GROUNDS (NO CHANGES TO THE GENERAL LOCATION AND NUMBER OF UPRIGHT MARKERS) AND ASSOCIATED STRUCTURAL AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS AT AN EXISTING CEMETERY LOCATED AT 22555 CRISTO REY DRIVE GATE OF HEAVEN CATHOLIC CEMETERY) SECTION I: PROTECT DESCRIPTION Application No.: M-2011-01 Applicant:Irving Gonzales on behalf of Gate of Heaven Catholic Cemetery Location: 22555 Cristo Rey Drive (APN 342-63-002,342-63-004, and 342-63-005) SECTION II: FINDINGS FOR MODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Cupertino received applications for a Modification of a Use Permit and an Architectural and Site Approval, as described in Section II of this Resolution; and WHEREAS, the necessary public notices have been given in accordance with the Procedural Ordinance of the City of Cupertino, and the Planning Commission has held one or more public hearings on this matter; and WHEREAS, the applicant has met the burden of proof required to support said application; and has satisfied the following requirements: 1) The proposed use, at the proposed location, will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity, and will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, general welfare, or convenience; 2) The proposed use will be located and conducted in a manner in accord with the Cupertino Comprehensive General Plan and Cupertino Zoning Ordinance and the purpose of this title. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That after careful consideration of maps, facts, exhibits, testimony and other evidence submitted in this matter, the application for Modification of the Use Permit are hereby Approved, subject to the conditions which are enumerated in this Resolution beginning on Page 2 thereof; and That the subconclusions upon which the findings and conditions specified in this resolution are based and contained in the public hearing record concerning Application No. M-2011-01, as set forth in the Minutes of the Planning Commission Meeting of March 22, 2011, and are incorporated by reference though fully set forth herein. PC 09-13-2022 431 of 439 Resolution No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-2- SECTION III: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 1. APPROVED EXHIBITS The approval is based on Exhibits submitted by Gonzales Architects, titled "St. Mary Section," dated March 4, 2011, consisting of pages A1.0, A2.0, LP-1, Preliminary Grading and Drainage Plan, Memo to the Canyon Oak Way Home Neighbors dated September 13, 2010 and Questions and Answers of the Proposed Development Dated August 12, 2010, and the Construction Activity Description in the letter dated March 4, 2011, except as may be amended by the Conditions contained in this Resolution. 2. USE AND DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Approval is granted to modify Use Permit, U-2005-04, to modify an approved plan of burial ground locations, landscaping and site improvements for an approximately four (4) acre portion of the cemetery as shown in the approved Exhibits. The applicant shall prepare a construction phasing schedule, demonstrating completion of the project within 14 years of this approval upon the conceptual phasing schedule provided below that prescribes the scope of work, timing of development and construction activity duration of each phase: Proposed Development Phasing Schedule Scope, Estimated Time Frame &Construction Duration Phase 1 Roadway &Landscape Buffer Year 1 time frame 1-2 month construction duration Phase 2 Ground Burials and Gazebo 1,492 in ground plots, 250 in ground cremains, 750 above ground cremain niches Years 6-10 time frame 3-5 month construction duration Phase 3 Ground Burials 1,222 in ground plots Years 2-5 time frame 1-2 month construction duration Phase 4 Terraced Ground Burials 1,138 upright marker plots Years 11-14 3-5 month construction duration 3. CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN A comprehensive construction management plan shall be prepared by the applicant and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to the start of construction on site including grading) or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 250 feet of any residential property. PC 09-13-2022 432 of 439 Resolution No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-3- 4. PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL All prior use permit conditions of approval (U-2005-04) and approvals through prior applications to this application shall remain in effect unless superseded by or in conflict with subsequent conditions of approval,including conditions of approval for M-2011-01. 5. SIGNAGE &SIGN PROGRAM Signage is not approved with this use permit application. The applicant shall be required to submit an application for a sign program and signage prior to installation of any signage on site. Signage shall conform to the City's Sign Ordinance. 6. ACCURACY OF THE PR0IECT PLANS The applicant/property owner is responsible to verify all pertinent property data including but not limited to property boundary locations, building setbacks, property size, building square footage, any relevant easements and/or construction records. Any misrepresentation of any property data may invalidate this approval and may require additional review. 7. OTHER DEPARTMENTS REVIEW All building department, fire department and Cupertino Sanitary District comments must be addressed prior to issuance of any permit required by the City. 8. LANDSCAPE PLAN The applicant shall submit detailed landscape and irrigation plans to be reviewed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. The landscape plan shall include water conservation and pesticide reduction measures in conformance with Chapter 14.15, Landscaping Ordinance, and the pesticide control measures referenced in Chapter 9.18, Stormwater Pollution Prevention and Watershed Protection, of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 9. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION REPORT The project is subject to all provisions delineated in the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14. 15). A landscape installation audit shall be conducted by a certified landscape professional after the landscaping and irrigation system have been installed. The findings of the assessment shall be consolidated into a landscape installation report. The landscape installation report shall include,but is not limited to: inspection to confirm that the landscaping and irrigation system are installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan, system tune-up, system test with distribution uniformity, reporting overspray or run-off that causes overland flow, and preparation of an irrigation schedule. The landscape installation report shall include the following statement: The landscape and irrigation system have been installed as specified in the landscape and irrigation design plan and complies with the criteria of the ordinance and the permit." 10. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE Per the Landscape Ordinance (CMC, Chapter 14.15), a maintenance schedule shall be established and submitted to the Director of Community Development or his/her designee, either with the landscape application package, with the landscape installation report, or any time before the landscape installation report is submitted. PC 09-13-2022 433 of 439 Resolution No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-4- a) Schedules should take into account water requirements for the plant establishment period and water requirements for established landscapes. b) Maintenance shall include, but not be limited to the following: routine inspection; pressure testing, adjustment and repair of the irrigation system; aerating and de-thatching turf areas; replenishing mulch; fertilizing; pruning; replanting of failed plants; weeding; pest control; and removing obstructions to emission devices. c) Failed plants shall be replaced with the same or functionally equivalent plants that may be size-adjusted as appropriate for the stage of growth of the overall installation. Failing plants shall either be replaced or be revived through appropriate adjustments in water, nutrients, pest control or other factors as recommended by a landscaping professional. 11. SOIL ANALYSIS REPORT A soils analysis report shall document the various characteristics of the soil (e.g. texture, infiltration rate, pH, soluble salt content, percent organic matter, etc) and provide recommendations for amendments as appropriate to optimize the productivity and water efficiency of the soil. The soil analysis report shall be made available to the professionals preparing the landscape and irrigation design plans in a timely manner either before or during the design process. A copy of the soils analysis report shall be submitted to the Director of Community Development as part of the landscape documentation package. 12. DUST CONTROL The following construction practices shall be implemented during all phases of construction for the proposed project to prevent visible dust emissions from leaving the site: a) Water all active construction areas at least twice daily and more often during windy periods to prevent visible dust from leaving the site; active areas adjacent to windy periods; active areas adjacent to existing land uses shall be kept damp at all times, or shall be treated with non-toxic stabilizers or dust palliatives. b) Cover all trucks hauling soil, sand, and other loose materials or require all trucks to maintain at least 2 feet of freeboard; c) Pave, apply water at least three times daily, or apply (non-toxic) soil stabilizers on all unpaved access roads,parking areas and staging areas at construction sites. d) Sweep streets daily, or more often if necessary (preferably with water sweepers) if visible soil material is carried onto adjacent public streets. e) The applicant shall incorporate the City's construction best management practices into the building permit plan set. 13. GRADING AND CONSTRUCTIO N HOURS All grading activities shall be limited to the dry season (April 15 to October 15). Grading hours shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Grading, street construction, demolition or underground utility work shall not occur on Saturdays, Sundays PC 09-13-2022 434 of 439 Resolution No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-5- and holidays, and during the nighttime period as defined in Section 10.48.053(b) of the Municipal Code. Construction activities shall be limited to Monday through Friday, 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Construction activities are not allowed on holidays. The developer shall be responsible for educating all contractors and subcontractors of said construction restrictions. Rules and regulation pertaining to all construction activities and limitations identified in this permit, along with the name and telephone number of a developer appointed disturbance coordinator, shall be posted in a prominent location at the entrance to the job site. 14. NOTICE OF FEES, DEDICATIONS, RESERVATIONS OR OTHER EXACTIONS The Conditions of Project Approval set forth herein may include certain fees, dedication requirements, reservation requirements, and other exactions. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d) (1),these Conditions constitute written notice of a statement of the amount of such fees, and a description of the dedications, reservations, and other exactions. You are hereby further notified that the 90-day approval period in which you may protest these fees, dedications, reservations, and other exactions, pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(a),has begun. If you fail to file a protest within this 90-day period complying with all of the requirements of Section 66020, you will be legally barred from later challenging such exactions. 15. SCREENING All mechanical and other equipment on the building or on the site shall be screened so they are not visible from public street areas or adjoining developments. Screening materials/colors shall match building features and materials. The height of the screening shall be taller than the height of the mechanical equipment that it is designed to screen. The location of equipment and necessary screening shall be reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development prior to issuance of building permits. 16. TREE PROTECTION As part of the demolition or building permit drawings, a tree protection plan shall be prepared by a certified arborist for the trees to be retained. In addition, the following measures shall be added to the protection plan: For trees to be retained, chain link fencing and other root protection shall be installed around the dripline of the tree prior to any project site work. No parking or vehicle traffic shall be allowed under root zones, unless using buffers approved by the Project Arborist. No trenching within the critical root zone area is allowed. If trenching is needed in the vicinity of trees to be retained, the City's consulting arborist shall be consulted before any trenching or root cutting beneath the dripline of the tree. Wood chip mulch shall be evenly spread inside the tree projection fence to a four-inch depth. Tree protection conditions shall be posted on the tree protection barriers. Retained trees shall be watered to maintain them in good health. A covenant on the property shall be recorded that identifies all the protected trees, prior to final occupancy. PC 09-13-2022 435 of 439 ResoluHon No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-6- The tree protection measures shall be inspected and approved by the certified arborist prior to issuance of building permits. The City's consulting arborist shall inspect the trees to be retained and shall provide reviews prior to issuance of demolition, grading or building permits. A report ascertaining the good health of the trees mentioned above shall be provided prior to issuance of final occupancy. SECTION IV: CONDITIONS ADMINISTERED BY THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 17. STREET WIDENING Public street widening and dedications shall be provided in accordance with City Standards and specifications and as required by the City Engineer. 18. CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS Curbs and gutters, sidewalks and related structures shall be installed in accordance with grades and standards as specified by the City Engineer. 19. STREET LIGHTING INSTALLATION Street lighting shall be installed and shall be as approved by the City Engineer. Lighting fixtures shall be positioned so as to preclude glare and other forms of visual interference to adjoining properties, and shall be no higher than the maximum height permitted by the zone in which the site is located. 20. FIRE HYDRANT Fire hydrants shall be located as required by the City and Santa Clara County Fire Department as needed. 21. GRADING Grading shall be as approved and required by the City Engineer in accordance with Chapter 16.08 of the Cupertino Municipal Code. 401 Certifications and 404 permits maybe required. Please contact Army Corp of Engineers and/or Regional Water Quality Control Board as appropriate. 22. DRAINAGE Drainage shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Hydrology and pre- and post-development hydraulic calculations must be provided to indicate whether additional storm water control measures are to be constructed or renovated. The storm drain system may include,but is not limited to, subsurface storage of peak stormwater flows (as needed), bioretention basins,vegetated swales, and hydrodynamic separators to reduce the amount of runoff of the site and improve water quality. The storm drain system shall be designed to detain water on-site (e.g.,via buried pipes or other appropriate means of storage) as necessary to avoid an increase of one percent flood water surface elevation of the culvert to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 23. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES The developer shall comply with the requirements of the Underground Utilities Ordinance No. 331 and other related Ordinances and regulations of the City of Cupertino, and shall coordinate with affected utility providers for installation of underground utility devices. The developer shall submit detailed plans showing utility underground provisions. Said plans shall be subject to prior approval of the affected Utility provider and the City Engineer. PC 09-13-2022 436 of 439 Resolution No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-7- 24. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT The project developer shall enter into a development agreement with the City of Cupertino, when the City Engineer deemed appropriate, providing for payment of fees, including but not limited to checking and inspection fees, storm drain fees, park dedication fees and fees for under grounding of utilities. Said agreement shall be executed prior to issuance of construction permits Fees: a. Checking&Inspection Fees: Per current fee schedule b. Grading Permit: Per current fee schedule c. Development Maintenance Deposit:1,000.00 d. Storm Drainage Fee: TBD e. Power Cost: f. Map Checking Fees: N/A g. Park Fees: N/A h. Street Tree By Developer Based on the latest effective PG&E rate schedule approved by the PUC Bonds: Faithful Performance Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvements Labor & Material Bond: 100% of Off-site and On-site Improvement On-site Grading Bond: 100% of site improvements. The fees described above are imposed based upon the current fee schedule adopted by the City Council. However, the fees imposed herein may be modified at the time of recordation of a final map or issuance of a building permit in the event of said change or changes, the fees changed at that time will reflect the then current fee schedule. 25. TRANSFORMERS Electrical transformers, telephone vaults and similar above ground equipment enclosures shall be screened with fencing and landscaping or located underground such that said equipment is not visible from public street areas. The transformer shall not be located in the front or side building setback area. 26. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Utilize Best Management Practices (BMPs), as required by the State Water Resources Control Board, for construction activity, which disturbs soil. BMP plans shall be included in grading and street improvement plans. 27. DEDICATION OF WATERLINES The developer shall dedicate to the City all waterlines and appurtenances installed to City Standards (if any) and shall reach an agreement with San Jose Water Company for water service to the subject development. 28. NPDES CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT For any land disturbance greater than 1 acre in area, the developer must obtain a Notice of Intent (NOI) from the State Water Resources Control Board, which encompasses preparation PC 09-13-2022 437 of 439 Resolution No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-8- of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), use of construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to control storm water runoff quality, and BMP inspection and maintenance. 29. C.3 REQUIREMENTS C.3 regulated improvements are required for all projects creating and/or replacing 10,000 S.F. or more of impervious surface (collectively over the entire project site). The developer shall reserve a minimum of 4% of developable surface area for the placement of low impact development measures,for storm water treatment, on the tentative map,unless an alternative storm water treatment plan, that satisfies C.3 requirements, is approved by the City Engineer. The developer must include the use and maintenance of site design, source control and storm water treatment Best Management Practices (BMPs), which must be designed per approved numeric sizing criteria. A Storm Water Management Plan, Storm Water Facilities Easement Agreement, Storm Water Facilities Operation and Maintenance Agreement, and certification of ongoing operation and maintenance of treatment BMPs are each required. All storm water management plans are required to obtain certification from a City approved third party reviewer. 30. EROSION CONTROL PLAN The developer must provide an approved erosion control plan by a Registered Civil Engineer. This plan should include all erosion control measures used to retain materials on site. Erosion control notes shall be stated on the plans. 31. WORK SCHEDULE Every 6 months, the developer shall submit a work schedule to the City to show the timetable for all grading/erosion control work in conjunction with this project. 32. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic control signs shall be placed at locations specified by the City. 33. OPERATIONS & MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT The developer shall enter into an Operations & Maintenance Agreement with the City prior to final occupancy. The Agreement shall include the operation and maintenance for non- standard appurtenances in the public road right-of-way that may include,but is not limited to, sidewalk, pavers, and street lights. 34. TRASH ENCLOSURES The trash enclosure plan must be designed to the satisfaction of the Environmental Programs Manager. Clearance by the Public Works Department is needed prior to obtaining a building permit. 35. REFUSE TRUCK ACCESS The developer must obtain clearance from the Environmental Programs Manager in regards to refuse truck access for the proposed development. 36. STREET TREES Street trees shall be planted within the Public Right of Way, when specified by the City Engineer, and shall be of a type approved by the City in accordance with Ordinance No. 125. PC 09-13-2022 438 of 439 Resolution No.6623 M-2011-01 March 22,2011 Page-9- 37. FIRE PROTECTION Fire sprinklers shall be installed in any new construction to the approval of the City. 38. SANTA CLARA WATER DISTRICT CLEARANCE Provide Santa Clara water district approval before recordation of the final map when necessary. The developer shall pay for and obtain Water District permit for activities or modifications within the District easement or fee right of way or affecting District facilities. 39. SANITARY DISTRICT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Cupertino Sanitary Dist ict prior to issuance of building permits. 40. SANTA CLARA COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT A letter of clearance for the project shall be obtained from the Santa Clara County Fire Department prior to issuance of building permits. 41. UTILITY EASEMENTS Clearance approvals from the agencies with easements on the property (including PG&E, PacBell, and California Water Company, and/or equivalent agencies) will be required prior to issuance of building permits. 42. ROAD WAY AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS Provide full design plans for both the proposed road extension and all necessary storm drainage improvements. Plans and submittal documents shall include grading quantities, proposed contours and spot elevations, a profile of the road extension in comparison with existing elevations, calculated square footage of proposed impervious surface area, calculated increase in storm drain runoff due to increased impervious area and fully designed storm drain and detention/retention system to ensure there is no increase in storm drain runoff from the property. Any retaining walls over 4-feet in height from top of wall to bottom of foundation will require full structural design with calculations. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 22nd day of March 2011, at a Regular Meeting of the Planning Coinmission of the City of Cupertino,State of California,by the following roll call vote: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: Chair Lee,Vice Chair Miller, Brophy,Sun, Brownley NOES: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: None ATTEST: APPROVED: Aarti Shrivastava Winnie Lee, C Director of Community Development Planning Commissi G:\Plarining PDREPORT RES 2010 M-2010-09 res.doc PC 09-13-2022 439 of 439