Loading...
CEP 10-28-2022 Searchable PacketCITY OF CUPERTINO CEP - STRATEGIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA This will be a teleconference meeting with no physical location Friday, October 28, 2022 11:00 AM Special Meeting - Community Engagement Plan (CEP) - Strategic Advisory Committee TELECONFERENCE / PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION TO HELP STOP THE SPREAD OF COVID-19 In accordance with Government Code 54953(e), this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the following ways: 1) E-mail comments by 10:00 a.m. on Friday, October 28 to the Committee at planning@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the Committee members before the meeting and posted to the City’s website after the meeting. 2) E-mail comments during the times for public comment during the meeting to the Committee at planning@cupertino.org. The staff liaison will read the emails into the record, and display any attachments on the screen, for up to 3 minutes (subject to the Chair’s discretion to shorten time for public comments). Members of the public that wish to share a document must email planning@cupertino.org prior to speaking. 3) Teleconferencing Instructions Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public comments as follows: Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may be made during “oral communications” for matters not on the agenda, and during the public comment period for each agenda item. To address the Committee, click on the link below to register in advance and access the meeting: Page 1 CEP 10-28-2022 1 of 12 CEP - Strategic Advisory Committee Agenda October 28, 2022 Online Please click the link below to join the webinar: https://cityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_AzoanLnxSDOpp4ZTbYBISw Phone Dial: (669) 900 6833 and enter Webinar ID: 924 9390 2629 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak) Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number. Or an H.323/SIP room system: H.323: 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) Meeting ID: 924 9390 2629 SIP: 92493902629@zoomcrc.com After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the webinar. Please read the following instructions carefully: 1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer. 2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your name, you may enter “Cupertino Resident” or similar designation. 3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on “raise hand.” Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak. 4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda topic. NOTICE AND CALL FOR A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CUPERTINO COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN - STRATEGIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a special meeting of the Cupertino Community Engagement Plan - Strategic Advisory Committee is hereby called for Friday, October 28, 2022 commencing at 11:00 a.m. In accordance with Government Code 54953(e), this will be a teleconference meeting without a physical location to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Page 2 CEP 10-28-2022 2 of 12 CEP - Strategic Advisory Committee Agenda October 28, 2022 Said special meeting shall be for the purpose of conducting business on the subject matters listed below under the heading, “Special Meeting." SPECIAL MEETING ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.Subject: Approve the minutes from the September 16 Community Engagement Plan - Strategic Advisory Committee special meeting Recommended Action: Approve the minutes from the September 16 Community Engagement Plan - Strategic Advisory Committee special meeting 1 - Draft Minutes POSTPONEMENTS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Committee on any matter within the jurisdiction of the Committee and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Committee from making any decisions with respect to a matter not on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS 2.Subject: Report from staff regarding the September 26, 2022 Community meeting and concluding remarks Recommended Action: Receive report and provide input to staff regarding future community engagement oppurtunities. STAFF AND COMMITTEE REPORTS FUTURE AGENDA SETTING ADJOURNMENT In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 6 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate Page 3 CEP 10-28-2022 3 of 12 CEP - Strategic Advisory Committee Agenda October 28, 2022 alternative format. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk’s Office in City Hall located at 10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, during normal business hours. IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section 2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These written communications are accessible to the public through the City’s website and kept in packet archives. Do not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City that you do not wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will be made publicly available on the City website. Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment. Page 4 CEP 10-28-2022 4 of 12 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 22-11613 Agenda Date: 10/28/2022 Agenda #: 1. Subject: Approve the minutes from the September 16 Community Engagement Plan - Strategic Advisory Committee special meeting Approve the minutes from the September 16 Community Engagement Plan - Strategic Advisory Committee special meeting CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 10/26/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ CEP 10-28-2022 5 of 12 City of Cupertino  10300 Torre Avenue  Cupertino, CA  95014  (408) 777‐3308       MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF  THE COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT PLAN – STRATEGIC ADVISORY COMMITTEE  HELD ON SEPTEMBER 16, 2022    CALL TO ORDER  Chair Moore opened the meeting at 1:00 p.m.    ROLL CALL  Commission Members present:          Kitty Moore, Chair and City Councilmember  Tessa Parish, Vice Chair and Chair, Housing Commission  Liang Chao, Vice Mayor     Commissioners Members absent:       Steven Scharf, Chair, Planning Commission    Staff present:                                          Luke Connolly, Senior Planner  Piu Ghosh, Planning Manager  Chris Jensen, City Attorney   Outside Panelists:    Ande Flower, Principal Planner, EMC Planning Group  Kylie Clark, Public Policy Coordinator, West Valley Community  Services (WVCS)     Lee Robinson, Be The Diversity             APPROVAL OF MINUTES  1. Subject: Approve the July 25 Community Engagement Plan – Strategic Advisory Committee Special  Meeting minutes   Recommended Action: Approve the July 25 Community Engagement Plan – Strategic Advisory  Committee Special Meeting minutes    Parish moved and Chao seconded.  AYES:   Moore, Parish, Chao, Scharf  NOES:    None  ABSTAIN: None  ABSENT: Scharf  VOTE:   3‐0‐0‐1  2. Subject: Approve the June 6 Community Engagement Plan ‐ Strategic Advisory Committee Special  Meeting minutes (continued from July 25, 2022)  Recommended Action: Approve the June 6 Community Engagement Plan – Strategic Advisory  Committee Special Meeting minutes    CEP 10-28-2022 6 of 12 2 Parish moved and Chao seconded to approve version 2 of draft minutes.  AYES:   Moore, Parish, Chao  NOES:    None  ABSTAIN: None  ABSENT: Scharf  VOTE:   3‐0‐0‐1    POSTPONEMENTS  None                    ORAL COMMUNICATIONS    Jennifer Griffin spoke about State Housing legislature and its impacts on local jurisdictions.    Lisa Warren spoke provided feedback about updates to the EngageCupertino Housing Element Update  site.     WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS  None    CONSENT CALENDAR  None    PUBLIC HEARINGS  None    OLD BUSINESS  None    NEW BUSINESS  3. Subject: Report from staff and EMC Planning Group regarding: 1) The upcoming September 26, 2022  Community Meeting; 2) Results of the online Housing Survey; 3) Summaries of the May 23 and July 25,  2022 Community meetings.   Recommended Action: Receive reports and provide input to staff regarding the September 26, 2022  Community Meeting and future community engagement opportunities    Staff member Connolly briefly reported out about activity since the July 25th meeting, namely to prepare  for the upcoming third community meeting to be held virtually on September 26 using feedback  gathered from the previous two community meetings and feedback from the Housing Survey.    Panelist Clark of WVCS led discussion on the previous virtual meetings (both held virtually): the first,  from May 23rd addressing Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing (AFFH) concerns of many in the  community; the second, held July 25th addressing student and senior housing needs. The recorded  meeting is currently being edited by staff and will be made available following the meeting.    CEP 10-28-2022 7 of 12 3 The third and final Community meeting planned for September 26 from 6:00 to 8:15 p.m. and is intended  to focus on members of the community who work (but cannot afford to live) in Cupertino and “house‐ rich” homeowners who are considered low‐income. Outreach included efforts to include Cupertino  businesses, WVCS clients, emails to local busineses, farmers markets, networking with Cupertino  Chamber of Commerce, and flyer distribution in local businesses to the City’s Housing Element Update  subscription list.     Members of the public, Lisa Warren and Jennifer Griffin, both expressed concern on use of “house‐rich”  terminology.    Staff member Connolly clarified the use of “house‐rich” was intended to address homeowners in which  their homes are their only asset.     Chao asked whether the meeting will be virtual, and if arrangements are being made to accommodate  those who have a limited use of technology and suggested a physical location in which to view the  meeting and outreach to Project Sentinel. Panelisk Clark clarified while the first community meeting was  hybrid, technological concerns did not provide the intended outcome to allow the next meetings to be  held successfully in that format and offered to provide support for older residents who would like to  participate. Panelist Clark will reach out for the contact information from Chao for Project Sentinel and  the house sharing program.     Parish spoke on Project Sentinel, and Moore also suggested outreach to clients of Reach Your Destination  Easily (RYDE) and VIA shuttle to address senior mobility needs.     Staff Member Ghosh informed the Committee that staff logistics will need to be coordinated to  accommodate an in‐person or hybrid meeting.    Parish further suggested the next community meeting either be held in person, and/or be virtual, instead  of combining the two in a hybrid format.     Member of the public, Lisa Warren, suggested for in‐person attendees to watch the meeting via Zoom.    Panelist Flower led discussion on results of the housing survey, which garnered 205 responses. Of the  survey respondents:   76.2% are between the ages of 41‐50 (17.1%), 51‐60 (24.4%), 61‐70 (22%), and 71‐80 (12.7%)   77.1% live in a single family home, and 68.3% are homeowners   50.2% are full‐time employed; 34.6% both live and work in Cupertino, 31.2% live in Cupertino  but work elsewhere, and 28.3% live in Cupertino but do not work   48.8% have lived in Cupertino for more than 20 years, and 55.6% have worked in Cupertino for  about two years or less    Top three goals based on importance for families living in Cupertino were:    Providing a diverse range of housing types to meet the needs of people at all income levels  (48.8%)   Preserving the current scale and massing of single family neighborhoods (35.6%)  CEP 10-28-2022 8 of 12 4  Limiting growth in hillsides and areas at risk for wildfire, Limiting height to preserve the  suburban scale and massing (tied, 29.3%)    When asked why Cupertino residents chose to reside in the City survey respondents cited:   Quality of schools (62%)   Proximity to work (52.2%)   Neighborhood safety (49.3%)    Issues facing survey respondents who wish to own a home in Cupertino but do not:   Cannot find a home within their target price range (32.7%)   Do not have the money for down payment (16.1%)   Keep getting outbid for homes by institutional investors or others able to pay cash (11.2%)    Issues facing survey respondents who wish to rent a home in Cupertino but do not:   Cannot find a home within their target price range (26.3%)   Cannot find a home that suits their needs (e.g. size, disability accommodations, etc) (8.8%)    When asked to state reasons why, survey respondents who can afford to live in Cupertino but do not  want to cited:   Getting better housing for their money in other cities (24.4%)   Lack of high‐quality mass transit (18%)   Too few retail options (13.2%)    Types of additional housing survey respondents would like to see in Cupertino:   Market‐rate condominiums and townhomes (46.3%)   Market‐rate duplexes, triplexes, etc. (44.9%)   Market‐rate single family detached homes (43.4%)   Market‐rate townhomes (owned) (42%)   Subsidized housing for seniors (40.5%)    When asked what they believe are the most urgent housing concerns in Cupertino, respondants cited:   Housing affordability (72.2%)   Housing availability (57.1%)   Homelessness (24.9%)    Biggest challenges addressing living and housing needs of lower income older adults (age 65+):   Lack of affordable older adult housing (59%)   Lack of older adult housing where services are within walking distance (46.8%)   Increased costs for goods and services (37.1%)    When asked what the best strategies for accoomodating 4,588 additional housing units, respondents  cited:   Increase the required number of affordable housing in all new projects (inclusionary housing)  (50.2%)   Increase density (i.e., smaller units, smaller lots) (44.4%)  CEP 10-28-2022 9 of 12 5  Allow taller buildings with more housing units (43.4%)     How home prices and rents can be reduced, according to respondents:   Increase the required percentage of Below Market Rate housing on new projects (51.2%)   Implement vacancy control (limit percentage of rent increases when rental housing turns over)  (34.6%)   Implement rent control that goes beyond the current State limit of 5% +CPI(maximum of 10%)  (31.2%)   Pass bond measures to provide funding for new affordable housing projects (22.9%)    When asked what their views are on Below Market Rate (BMR) Housing and the City’s dedicated BMR  units are 15% (rental) and 20% (ownership) when building 7 or more units, respondents:   The required percentage of affordable units is too low and should be increased (39.5%)   The required percentage of affordable units should stay the same (31.2%)   The required percentage of affordable units is too high and should be decreased or eliminated  (16.6%)   Developers should have the option to pay in‐lieu fees instead of providing actual housing units  (12.2%)    Of respondents who both live and work in Cupertino:   Commuted less than a mile (29.8%), 10 or more miles (23.4%), or in‐between 1‐10 miles (46.8)   Most respondents commute using a vehicle (65.9%); 13.7% of respondents work from home all or  most of the time, and 14.6% either walk or operate a non‐powered bicycle (tied for 7.3%)   48.8% own or lease 2 vehicles, and 47.3% require 2 parking spaces to accommodate vehicles at  their residence (92.1% of respondents do not use a work vehicle that must be parked in their  residence)    When asked what would encourage one to consider taking public transit instead of using a private  vehicle, respondents cited:    Increased frequency of service (50.2%)   Routes that go from home to work without multiple transfers (39%)   Faster service, not any slower than driving (37.1%)   Faster service, not more than 30% slower than driving (29.8%)    Member of the public, Jennifer Griffin, spoke highly of survey and expressed concern of why question of  whether survey respondents agree with the state’s housing number requirements.    Parish recommended survey results be included for future Planning Commission hearings on new  projects addressing parking concerns.    Moore asked for survey results to be included in the written communications in addition to the survey  questions.    Chao requested the full data set to be available on the website and expressed concerns on survey  respondents’ background and impacts on their views of living spaces. Parish followed up with  CEP 10-28-2022 10 of 12 6 suggestion to reach out to local businesses targeting the Asian population. While the housing survey  itself was conducted in English, the results from both WVCS’ feedback and this housing survey are  requested to be uploaded to the EngageCupertino Housing Element webpage. Staff and consultants will  look into whether budget and time constraints will impact if the survey and additional outreach can be  conducted and translated into multiple languages.     Panelists Flower and Clark concluded presentation inviting attendees to the third Community meeting  to address needs of commuters and those who work in Cupertino but cannot afford to live in the City  and homeowners who are considered low‐income and a general timeline of the evening’s events and  encourage discussion that would inform policies moving forward.    Chao provided feedback to include website on flyer and edit flyer to reduce content and increase text  size if flyer can be updated before the event.    STAFF UPDATES AND COMMISSION REPORTS   None    Committee Updates  None     FUTURE AGENDA (limitation, cannot discuss)   Next meeting: Friday, October 28th 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m.   WVCS and EMC will provide PowerPoint compilation, and Committee can select panelist to  present Committee accomplishments to Council at a future Council meeting.     ADJOURNMENT:  The meeting was adjourned at 3:00 p.m. to the next special meeting.     Respectfully submitted:         /s/Cyrah Caburian___  Cyrah Caburian  Administrative Assistant  CEP 10-28-2022 11 of 12 CITY OF CUPERTINO Agenda Item 22-11614 Agenda Date: 10/28/2022 Agenda #: 2. Subject: Report from staff regarding the September 26, 2022 Community meeting and concluding remarks Receive report and provide input to staff regarding future community engagement oppurtunities. CITY OF CUPERTINO Printed on 10/26/2022Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ CEP 10-28-2022 12 of 12