03-15-2023 Final BPC Packet BPC 03-15-2023
Page 1 of 123
CITY OF CUPERTINO
AGENDA
lop
CUPERTINO BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION
10300 Torre Avenue, City Hall Conference Room C
Wednesday, March 15, 2023
7:00 PM
This will be a Hybrid Meeting-In-Person and Teleconference Option
IN PERSON AND TELECONFERENCE/PUBLIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION
Members of the public wishing comment on an item on the agenda may do so in the
following ways:
1) Appear in person at Cupertino City Hall. Members of the audience who address the
Commission must come to the lectern/microphone, and are requested to complete a Speaker
Card and identify themselves. Completion of Speaker Cards and identifying yourself is
voluntary and not required to attend the meeting or provide comments.
2) E-mail comments by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March15 to the Commission at
bikepedcommission@cupertino.org. These e-mail comments will be received by the
commission members before the meeting and posted to the City's website after the
meeting.
3) Teleconferencing Instructions
Members of the public may observe the teleconference meeting or provide oral public
comments as follows:
Oral public comments will be accepted during the teleconference meeting. Comments may
be made during "oral communications" for matters not on the agenda, and during the
public comment period for each agenda item.
To address the Commission, click on the link below to register in advance and access the
meeting:
Online
Register in advance for this webinar:
https:Hcityofcupertino.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_NxYgwC3_Qkg94TDsPBPUJQ
Page 1
1
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 2 of 123
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda March 15,2023
Phone
Dial 669 900 6833 and enter Webinar ID: 988 6477 9201 (Type *9 to raise hand to speak)
Unregistered participants will be called on by the last four digits of their phone number.
Or an H.323/SIP room system:
H.323:
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands)
213.244.140.110 (Germany)
103.122.166.55 (Australia)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
Meeting ID: 988 6477 9201
SIP: 98864779201@zoomcrc.com
After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about
joining the webinar.
Please read the following instructions carefully:
1. You can directly download the teleconference software or connect to the meeting in your
internet browser. If you are using your browser, make sure you are using a current and
up-to-date browser: Chrome 30+, Firefox 27+, Microsoft Edge 12+, Safari 7+. Certain
functionality may be disabled in older browsers, including Internet Explorer.
2. You will be asked to enter an email address and a name, followed by an email with
instructions on how to connect to the meeting. Your email address will not be disclosed to
the public. If you wish to make an oral public comment but do not wish to provide your
name,you may enter "Cupertino Resident" or similar designation.
3. When the Chair calls for the item on which you wish to speak, click on "raise hand."
Speakers will be notified shortly before they are called to speak.
4. When called, please limit your remarks to the time allotted and the specific agenda
topic.
5. Members of the public that wish to share a document must email
bikepedcommission@cupertino.org prior to speaking.
ROLL CALL
Page 2
2
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 3 of 123
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda March 15,2023
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Subject: February 23, 2023 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Minutes
Recommended Action: Approve the February 23, 2023 Minutes
A-Draft Minutes
POSTPONEMENTS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This portion of the meeting is reserved for persons wishing to address the Commission on any matter
within the jurisdiction of the Commission and not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3)
minutes. In most cases, State law will prohibit the Commission from making any decisions with respect
to a matter not on the agenda.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
OLD BUSINESS
2. Subject: Future Agenda Items (Zhao)
Recommended Action: Develop and Maintain a List of Future Agenda Items for the
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
NEW BUSINESS
3. Subject: Santa Clara County Countywide Trails Master Plan Map Update
(Coates-Maldoon)
Recommended Action: Receive Information and Provide Feedback on Santa Clara
County Countywide Trails Master Plan Map Update
A-Presentation
4. Subject: Cupertino Safe Routes to School Program Update (Walkowiak)
Recommended Action: Receive Update on Cupertino Safe Routes to School Program
Activities
A-Presentation
5. Subject: Finch Avenue/Calle de Barcelona Intersection Discussion (Zhao)
Recommended Action: Discussion on Finch Avenue/Calle de Barcelona Intersection
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
6. Subject: Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All)
Recommended Action: Receive Updates from Staff and Commissioners Regarding
Recent Activities
Page 3
3
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 4 of 123
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Agenda March 15,2023
ADJOURNMENT
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), anyone who is planning to attend this
meeting who is visually or hearing impaired or has any disability that needs special assistance should
call the City Clerk's Office at 408-777-3223, at least 48 hours in advance of the meeting to arrange for
assistance. In addition, upon request, in advance, by a person with a disability, meeting agendas and
writings distributed for the meeting that are public records will be made available in the appropriate
alternative format.
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the members after publication of the agenda will
be made available for public inspection. Please contact the City Clerk's Office in City Hall located at
10300 Torre Avenue, Cupertino, California 95014, during normal business hours.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please be advised that pursuant to Cupertino Municipal Code section
2.08.100 written communications sent to the Cupertino City Council, Commissioners or City staff
concerning a matter on the agenda are included as supplemental material to the agendized item. These
written communications are accessible to the public through the City's website and kept in packet
archives. Do not include any personal or private information in written communications to the City
that you do not wish to make public, as written communications are considered public records and will
be made publicly available on the City website.
Members of the public are entitled to address the members concerning any item that is described in the
notice or agenda for this meeting, before or during consideration of that item. If you wish to address the
members on any other item not on the agenda, you may do so during the public comment.
Page 4
4
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 5 of 123
12 CITY OF CUPERTINO
CUPERTINO Agenda Item
23-12117 Agenda Date: 3/15/2023
Agenda #: 1.
Subject: February 23, 2023 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Minutes
Approve the February 23, 2023 Minutes
CITY OF CUPERTINO Page 1 of 1 Printed on 3/8/2023
powered by LegistarTM 5
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 6 of 123
DRAFT MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
BICYCLE PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION
11M
February 23, 2023
CUPERTINO
Draft Minutes
The meeting was called to order at 7:02 p.m.
ROLL CALL:
Present: Ilango Ganga, Grace John, Herve Marcy, Joel Wolf (VC), John Zhao (C)
Absent: None
Staff: David Stillman, Staff Liaison
Others Present: Evelyn Moran, Project Manager; Ayano Hattori, Project Manager; Susan
Michael, Capital Improvement Programs Manager; Michael Freitag, Gates and
Associates; Dana Falk, Gates and Associates; Casey Case, Gates and Associates; Rebecca
Flanegan, Gates and Associates
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. January 18, 2023 Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Minutes
Commissioner Marcy joined the meeting at 7:04 p.m.
MOTION: Chair Ganga moved, seconded by Commissioner Wolf to approve the minutes as
presented.
MOTION PASSED: 5-0
POSTPONEMENTS
No Postponements
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Jennifer Shearin, public speaker commented on a Motion in the minutes for January saying the
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission needed to state 30 or 35 feet, one or the other. The "Future
Agenda Items" was too long.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
None
OLD BUSINESS
1
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
6
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 7 of 123
2. Future Agenda Items (Ganga)
Carmen Road Bridge
Education on How to Use Two-Stage Left Turn Boxes
Path between Lincoln Elementary and Monta Vista High School
The Impact of Semi-Rural Designation on Bike and Ped Projects/Priorities
Reassess the Intersection at Bubb Road/McClellan Road
Stevens Creek Boulevard, Phases 1-3
Vision Zero (Workplan Item)
Lead Pedestrian Walk Interval(LPI) (start the pedestrian green before vehicles)
Lawson Middle School Bike Path
Input from Seniors on the Bicycle Pedestrian Improvements
Bollinger Road Safety Corridor Project
AB 43-Summary and how Commission can support implementation(to what extent we can
reduce speed limits)
Bicycle Licensing (to prevent bike theft)
Bicycle Facilities (Workplan Item)
Land Donation from Richard Lowenthal (Carter)
Review Progress toward BPC Objectives (Six months to annually)
BPC Input at the VTA BPAC Meeting Regarding Adult Bicycle Education(Lindskog/Ganga)
League of American Bicyclists Application-Due 2/2023
Review Bicycle/Pedestrian Improvements and Provide Input from the Public
Pedestrian Safety around Shopping Centers
Update from Safe Routes to School (SR2S)
Examine Pedestrian Walkways for Safety
Nomination of a City Representative of the VTA BPAC (Feb)
Pedestrian Focused Area in Cupertino related to the VTA Plan for Pedestrian Safety
Petition to have a 3-way stop sign on Calle de Barcelona and Finch Avenue (2/23/23 Written
Communication)
Jennifer Shearin, public speaker commented on an email regarding a petition to have a three-
way stop sign installed at the intersection at Calle de Barcelona and Finch Avenue. She wanted
this added to the list of Future Agenda Items.
Commissioner Zhao noted the Future Agenda item at the end of the meeting and suggested
discussing this at the end of the meeting. Commissioner Ganga said going forward, "Future
Agenda Item" should be taken off as an agenda item at the end of the Agenda. David Stillman,
Transportation Manager said he would investigate that.
NEW BUSINESS
3. Election of the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission Chair and Vice Chair for 2023
2
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
7
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 8 of 123
NOMINATION: Commissioner Wolf, seconded by Commissioner Marcy nominated
Commissioner Zhao as Chair of the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission for 2023.
NOMINATION FOR COMMISSIONER ZHAO AS CHAIR FOR THE BICYCLE
PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION FOR 2023 PASSED:4-0 Ganga Abstain
NOMINATION: Commissioner Marcy, seconded by Chair Zhao nominated Commissioner
Wolf as Vice Chair of the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission for 2023.
NOMINATION FOR COMMISSIONER WOLF AS VICE CHAIR FOR THE BICYCLE
PEDESTRIAN COMMISSION FOR 2023 PASSED:4-0 Ganga Abstain
4. Consider the Memorial Park Specific Plan Update on the Development of the
Conceptual Design and Community Input (Hattori)
Ayano Hattori, Project Manager introduced the Memorial Park Specific Plan Update on the
Development of the Conceptual Design and Community Input. Michael Freitag, Gates, and
Associates gave a presentation on the Memorial Park Specific Plan.
Vice Chair Wolf commented on the parking and thought it was good to encourage people to
walk or bike to the park; he wondered where the bike rack design was and where they would
be located. Ms. Hattori responded that things were not at that stage of planning yet but there
was a plan for bike racks in the future. Vice Chair Wolf suggested an artistic design to the bike
rack.
Commissioner Marcy inquired about what the improved entry would look like. Mr. Freitag
answered that the improved entry plans were not solidified yet. He did foresee providing clear
and concise direction for all users or identifying certain entry points for all accessibilities at this
stage of planning. Commissioner Ganga wanted to know a rough estimate on cost. Ms. Hattori
said that will be addressed later.
Vice Chair Wolf did not see plans for a dog-off-leash area. Ms. Hattori did not believe that was
part of the plan but offered the 'open comment area' of the survey to recommend that. She
added final decisions were a balance of what the public wanted.
Chair Zhao inquired of the relationship between parking and where the bicycle and multi-use
parkways were. Mr. Freitag responded that the current connections were what was proposed
on the system-wide Bike Master Plan. Chair Zhao was concerned about bicyclists navigating
through parking lots. Mr. Freitag explained that the intent of the bike route was to connect from
Anton Way to Mary Avenue. As program usage was evaluated, he did not recommend having
bike routes end in parking lots.
Commissioner Marcy asked about what would be needed for the bike garden to be
implemented in a different setting if it ended up not being part of the Specific Plan. Ms. Hattori
3
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
8
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 9 of 123
explained that the intent was to grasp what the public wanted to see overall;there could end up
being a mix-and-match between all the options.
Jean Bedord, public speaker pointed out the importance of the bus line on Stevens Creek
Boulevard and felt noisy events needed to be placed near there. Also, the Bicycle Pedestrian
Commission (Commission) needed to encourage people to use the bus to get to the access
points. She mentioned those coming from the Senior Center.
Nori, public speaker felt Memorial Park did not need an identified focus, it could have a
blended focus to meet many people's interests.
Commissioner Ganga wondered if action was required. Ms. Hattori was looking for feedback
on the general direction and for the Commission to accept the update. Susan Michael, Capital
Improvement Programs Manager said staff was making note of the feedback, so no formal
action was needed.
Vice Chair Wolf liked the idea of a mix of the three ideas: nature, community, and
amphitheater. He wanted the ballpark removed from the nature design. Commissioner Marcy
thought what mattered was accessibility for bikers and walkers.
Commissioner Ganga liked the nature concept, incorporating the other aspects was good,
making the park useful for children and seniors was good. It was nice to keep the amphitheater
in the same location because the cost to move it was a lot. Regarding the ballpark, it was not
needed because there were others in other locations.
Commissioner Marcy wanted to know if there were studies done on improved entry and
reduced pressure on parking, that way the parking area could be repurposed.
Chair Zhao understood the current amphitheater was not Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) compliant and it was important to have an amphitheater that was accessible to everyone.
He wondered if it was possible to expand the amphitheater and still have access for truck
loading. The ballpark was underutilized, he proposed people using other fields in Wilson Park.
Regarding bike networks, he mentioned conflict with bike paths and the west parking lots. The
Mary Avenue access point was sounding more significant, and he wondered if the west parking
lot could be changed in the scope.
Vice Chair Wolf remarked on the challenges for kids getting to and from the park safely,
especially if they were biking from across town. He mentioned Stelling and Stevens Creek.
Commissioner Ganga spoke regarding easy access to the park for bicyclists and mentioned
there was a plan for a separated Class 4 bike lane on Stevens Creek Boulevard. He cited the
example of the buffered bike lane on Mary Avenue and said people could use the Don Burnett
Bridge and then the buffered bike lane on Mary Avenue.
NO ACTION TAKEN
4
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
9
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 10 of 123
5. I-280 Trail Renaming Survey (Moran)
Evelyn Moran, Project Manager gave a presentation on the Renaming of the I-280 Trail.
Commissioner Marcy asked about implementation and the meaning, such as the word "Innu."
Ms. Moran answered that the word meanings were going to be made clear. She remarked that
signage would have the trail name, the description, the tribal name, and the heritage behind
that.
Jennifer Shearin, public speaker was disappointed that she had to choose a name from a set
number of options. There was a four-person difference between option one and two. She
preferred both options move forward.
MOTION: Vice Chair Wolf moved, seconded by Commissioner Ganga to recommend to the
City Council to receive the survey results and approve the recommended selection of Tamien
Innu for the renaming of the I-280 Trail.
MOTION PASSED: 5-0
Chair Zhao discussed the background of Junipero Serra and why the trail was being renamed.
He fully supported the renaming of Tamien Innu as an indigenous name. Commissioner Ganga
agreed. Commissioner John supported the renaming. Vice Chair Wolf felt the name was
appropriate. Commissioner Marcy felt it was good to choose the name supported by most
residents.
6. Update on the Bicycle Pedestrian Focused Capital Improvement Program Projects
and Staff Proposal for Fiscal Year 2024-25 Five-year Capital Improvement Program
Projects (Michael)
Susan Michael, Capital Improvement Programs Manager gave a presentation on the Fiscal Year
(FY)2024/25 five-year Capital Improvement Program(CIP)projects.
Commissioner Marcy understood there was an opportunity for a bike/ped underpass under the
McClellan Bridge and Stevens Creek Boulevard Bridge. He wondered if this needed to be added
to the list of projects as they were not classified as bicycle and pedestrian projects in the
presentation. Ms. Michael answered that those bridges came to CIP as repairs. There were
bike/ped aspects to those projects but the main work being done was repair. She promised to
come back and give an update to the Bicycle Pedestrian Commission(Commission).
Commissioner Ganga asked about the pedestrian improvements from Orange Avenue to De
Anza Boulevard, and on Stelling Road from Stevens Creek Boulevard to McClellan Road. The
Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) deemed this a pedestrian improvement area and it
made sense for the City of Cupertino complete their work. Additionally, he wondered if
surrounding cities were sharing in the project cost. David Stillman, Transportation Manager,
clarified that the VTA's plan was not designated for VTA to contribute funds for capital
projects, it was more of a blueprint that the VTA used as part of partnership with other
5
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
10
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 11 of 123
jurisdictions to identify needs for pedestrian/transit connectivity throughout the region. The
VTA and the City took care of many of the projects identified in that plan. He offered to explain
and update the Commission in the future. Commissioner Ganga wanted to know exactly where
the San Thomas Aquino/Saratoga Creek Trail Extension was located. Ms. Michael replied that
staff was developing the design of that parcel, which was ending. That parcel has a bike/ped
trail through the park, which was a done deal. The questions from the Joint Commission were
how the trail could be continued beyond the property line. Staff wanted to have a separate
feasibility study to see what that would entail.
Vice Chair Wolf asked about funding for design and construction of the Carmen Road Bridge.
He understood the land was acquired for the bridge and he wondered why the project was
pushed out. Ms. Michael relayed that community feedback was heard, the City has the
property, the right-of-way was in the City's favor but there was not enough staff to start this
project. Vice Chair Wolf wondered if the Lawson Middle School Bike Lane project was under
$50-60,000. Mr. Stillman said this was currently a Workplan item; once there was a feasibility
study and a recommended design it could be recommended to CIP for the upcoming FY.
Erik Lindskog, public speaker did not want the Carmen Road Bridge delayed any more than
was needed. He suggested getting funding from other sources.
Jennifer Shearin, public speaker noted there were not a lot of bike/ped items on the list. The
feasibility study for Lawson Middle School was completed in 2019. She spoke further regarding
the McClellan Road Bridge.
Vice Chair Wolf repeated his thoughts about the Carmen Road Bridge; he wanted to see that
project moved up.
Commissioner Ganga commented on the existing priorities and completing those first. He cited
the Stevens Creek Boulevard project and the Bollinger Road project. He noted that
Commissioners in the past asked to move the Carmen Road Bridge up in priority.
Chair Zhao inquired how the Stevens Creek Boulevard project linked up with the Stevens Creek
Corridor Vision Study. He was concerned about bike lanes previously installed that would need
to be torn up later. Mr. Stillman explained that the Corridor Study was going to work around
and integrate the elements that were important and critical to each city participating.
Understanding that the bike lanes were important, there was no intent to uproot those. Chair
Zhao asked about getting some projects started on design, even if it was at a slower pace, in
order to push some items up. Ms. Michael reiterated that it came down to staffing. Chair Zhao
asked how increased staff impacted prioritization of projects. Ms. Michael said the Commission
was welcome to give as general or specific feedback as possible. Chad Mosley, Interim Director
of Public Works relayed that if there was more staff more projects could be pushed out. There
were also budget restrictions, a tax audit, and some large expenditures, such as the City Hall
project. Staff was doing their best with what they had. Lastly, Chair Zhao did not agree to
6
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
11
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 12 of 123
taking the Saratoga Creek Trail off the Work Plan; it should remain in the CIP proposed
projects.
Commissioner Marcy noticed that most projects were projected to be complete in 2027 and he
was not comfortable with that plan. He wanted to know if this could stand to a vote. Chair Zhao
said something could be put on the record. Mr. Mosley recalled there was mention of the
Stevens Creek Boulevard projects, Phases 2A, 2B and 3; Phase 2A was going to bid very shortly.
That took the bike lane from Wolfe Road to De Anza Boulevard. Concurrently, staff was
working on Phase 2B which went from De Anza Boulevard to Highway 85. Phase 3 went
beyond De Anza College.
Chair Zhao asked about the scaling of the expenditures as there was a jump from$1.3 million to
$18 million in FY 2026-27. Ms. Michael responded that this list included just the new projects,
not the existing projects. She added that the City Hall project was going to be added this year.
Mr. Mosley exclaimed that staff was asking for $1.3 million this year but had some $40 million
in existing projects. Half of the $18 million went toward the McClellan Road Bridge, which staff
was looking to get grant funds for.
Vice Chair Wolf echoed Commissioner Marcy, the bike/ped projects were pushed out and not
given priority. He wanted to see Carmen Road Bridge and the Bollinger Road project pushed
up.
MOTION: Vice Chair Wolf moved, seconded by Commissioner Marcy to recommend to the
City Council to:
1. Have the timeline for the Carmen Road Bridge project be moved up to Fiscal Year
2023/2024 and to not deprioritize any Bicycle Pedestrian Commission projects that are
currently in progress;and
2. Consider adding staffing to accommodate this additional work.
MOTION PASSED: 4-0,John Abstain
MOTION: Vice Chair Wolf moved, seconded by Commissioner Marcy to recommend to the
City Council to:
1. Ensure design options for McClellan Road Bridge Reconstruction Project prioritize
improved bicycle pedestrian access for Fiscal Year 2024/2025.
MOTION PASSED: 4-0,John Abstain
Commissioner John left the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
STAFF AND COMMISSION REPORTS
7. Staff Update and Commissioner Activity Report (All)
7
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
12
BPC 03-15-2023
Page 13 of 123
David Stillman, Transportation Manager said the opening of the Regnart Creek Trail Ribbon
Cutting event was planned for March 18 at Wilson Park. The second Lawson Bikeway
Community Meeting was scheduled for March 16 via video teleconference. Lastly, tonight's
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission meeting was the final virtual meeting; in-person meetings were
to resume March 15 in Conference Room C at City Hall.
Erik Lindskog gave a presentation on the VTA BPAC meeting update.
Commissioner Ganga reported on the Mayor's Meeting and the Safe Routes to School (SR2S)
meeting for February. Commissioner Marcy was scheduled to attend the SR2S and Mayor's
meeting in March.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
SUBMITTED BY:
David Stillman, Staff Liaison
Note: Any attachments can be found on the Cupertino Website
https://www.cul2ertino.org/our-city/agendas-minutes
8
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Special Meeting
February 23,2023
13
Bicycle Pedestrian Commission
Agenda Item 44
February 23, 2023
r � a I i z e
Memor*i I P rk
4`'V. 19Ss
CUPERTINO
SPECIHC PLAN February2023
revitalize
Memorial Park AG5 NDA
r ,
PURPOSE: To present three park concepts to revitalize Memorial
k Park and hear from the COMMUNITYto create a single
` preferred concept.
r 1. PARTICIPATION REMINDERS
r 2. INTRODUCTIONS
3. ABOUT THE PROJECT
4. WHAT WE'VE HEARD
5. THREE PARK CONCEPTS
6. COMMENTS or QUESTIONS
- 7. NEXT STEPS: STAY INVOLVED.
15
revitalize
Memorial Park 1NT1\-%-JDUffP, 0
2 NS
CITY OF
Chad Mosley Rachelle Sander
Interim Director of Director of
Public Works Parks and Recreation
Susan Michael Ayano Hattori
Capital Improvement Project Manager
C U P E RT I N O Programs Manager
Michael Freitag
GATES Project Manager
+ASSOCIATES Dana Falk Rebecca Flanegan
Planner Outreach Coordinator
16
r e v i t a l i z e BPC 03-15-2023
Memorial Park Page 17 of 123
EXPERTISE
in park design &placemaking
• INCLUSIVE PROCESS GATES
proactive community engagement
IMPLEMENTATION ORIENTED +ASSOCIATE S wo
reality based
+� �® 54+ COMMERCIAL
� ,� .: + +COLLEGES 0 WMEDICAL CENTERS .6 w,
0YEARS • 10 •,..•••0 � �
210 +
' GETTING U C��[C +� 175 BUSINESS C
; I�-12 • . • CAMPUSES o �,
SPACES ••'�••
t F, PEOPLE :
= W
��+- � C}�DDLS .•'• STREET �� 'h�••••• ••
a' OUTSIDE : # •...• ' SCAPES oe
� � ` •x' uy �
3D+5PQRTS FIELDS' 14�+ PLANNING PROJECTS
L
60+TRAILS AND OPEN SPACES it" 560+RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITIES 55+ SISNAGE
e + *" G5+ACTIVE ADULT COMMUNITIES PROGRAMS 17
revitalize
Memorial Park ABOUT THE PROJECIF
s A , PROJECT PURPOSE
. • Improve the site and determine how to best
Community
meet the future recreation, community
- Center gathering, event, and open space need:
Cupertino.
• Further Parks and Recreation System Master
r Memorial Park
Plan's vision foexpanding civic event and
community gathering spaces
`V . 3 741 • aj A enhancing natural site and park features
w
9 • Enhance Memorial Parkumique identity ,
t Senior . 5 arts create asense of placgand grow a
P t
Center * Center• z° distinctive expression of the park to achieve a
.Stevens Creek Boulevard balance between the built and natural
AON
environments.
' 18
revitalize
Memorial Park ABOUT THE PROJECIF
PARKS AND RECREATION SYSTEM MASTER
KEY COMMUNITY THEML Recommendations for Memorial Park
FOCUSCommunity hub
II '
:: a' - - - Multi-use PARK& FACILITY THE ARTS UNIQUELY CULTURAL Civicfocused event space
ACCESS CUPERTINO DIvERSITY
is Nature Play Areas
ir 0 Universal/All-Inclusive Play Areas
Water Play
,mic
kww4,
NATURE PARTNERSHIPS EXTRAORDINARY RECREATION � Improved Outdoor Event Space Citywide Events
EXPERIENCE PLAY VARIETY
0 Improved Outdoor Event Space Neighborhood Events
Pickleball Courts
.)utdoor Recreation Diversity
TRAILS S SOCIALGATHERING WELCOMING YOUTH&TEEN 0
CONNECTIVITY & CELEBRATION PLACES&SERVICES. EMPOWEMENT Improved Comfort
=
Natural Vegetation Enhancements 19
revitalize
Memorial Park ABOUT THE PROJECIF
• Engage the public to
REVITALIZE MEMORIAL PARK
as a community gathering and multi -use,
civic-focused event spacewhile considering
the context of the natural landscapeand
facilities, community's needs, and the existing
site's potential.
4 a F 55
r� T Mi
• Foster social cohesiveness ` p
and diverse activities for all
ages and abilities j
• Create high quality
recreation experiences I °
• Provide sustainable facilities,
programs and services 20
revitalize
Memorial Park ABOUT
— ]
THE
co
•
Site Assessment
O
Memorial Park
p Q Conceptual Design
c
y�
03 �Ced.q�i�
Schematic Design
Pound 1 (Sept to Nov2022)
What do we want?
o�
3
Round 2 qan to Feb 2023)
What alternative is best? �t
♦♦ Adoption
Public Review(Aug2023)40 Implementation
21
revitalize3]EARD
Memorial Park WHAT WEIVEB g
COMMUNITYINPUT — SCENARIOS
CURRENT hUUURAL9fEAND PAID:
2W
• I AND F U T l!R COMMUNrrr GATE! SPACE
Eh� R 1�4L � �� a � cnnc EVEr,rrspACE
NATU PA L CN1C
COMMUNITY MEMBERS WEANa 34 mm hu NATWOLSnANDPARK
ROUND
#_ 'DTHROUGHOUTPARK SPACE
PARKCChANM9f1E GATHEMNG SPACE
OUTREACH
CR+IC F.'EfU SPACE
® � IDENTITY M 16
GAINERING
Survey Questions #6-7 SPACE
and Dot Votes pp• community survey
il mist atMemo al Parkl S
Y i� _ _ — me Pm99ooeitw'W
y
I' pop-up booths
• webinar
►N locus group interviews
22
revitalize
Memorial Park WHAT WEIVEBARDgFIIN
Most supported by outreach results Top current features liked NOW:
• Festivals and events
• Walking paths
F. , • Natural areas and trees
PARK a FACILITY UNIQUELY • Playgrounds
ACCESS CUPERTINO
• Lawn spaces
,,ice, 4
Top features wanted in the FUTURE:
NATURE EXTRAORDINARY RY RECREATION • New water play amenities
EXPERIENCE PLAY VARIETY
• Shade by adding trees
IR • New recreation amenities
• Upgraded amphitheater
SOCIAL GATHERING
& CELEBRATION • Bike connectivity
23
revitalize
Memorial Park DESIGN Ng2PfUTS
Christensen Drive
----------------- � Recreation Facility Soctal Gathering Park'
ng
�W Walking
Recreation Facili y UP y
Festivals and Community Events ESports
I; I
`,' • Existing programmed uses to remain
`..,, `- (, Alves Drive • Existing programmed uses redistributed
----------------------
6
I
C
11 Stevens Creek Boulevard
24